Nasa's Next Moon Mission

[Ondelendo]

I am very happy to see the vidoe explains how NASA will send humans to moon or other planets

I have created this video using 3ds max, after effects, photoshop and premiere from you, hopefully the others also are happy for You

[bebeheuy]

I Love The Video explains how NASA will send humans to moon or other planetsI have created this video using 3ds max, after effects, photoshop and premiere.It Can Increase My Knowledge

[willamricard]

Nice Video This video explains how NASA will send humans to moon or other planets

I have created this video using 3ds max That You Share , So Very Nice Thanks You

[imegatrone]

I Really Like The Video Nasa's Next Moon Mission From Your

[landerzoo]

that's impossible, even for a computer.

[eltuzo466]

Yaaaaaaaay!! more ROCKS!!

[BrianLuper]

Another thing is the earth looks like a solid blue ball from the moon. These pictures of clouds and things in detail on our planet from that distance are completely false and fabricated. Never seen such B.S. in my life.

[BrianLuper]

Not allowed there or any other planet. Are apes allowed into your home? We have a place for them.....It's called orbiting (Running) around the pen.

[TheSaulos]

Yes the capsule did land on Mars, if it were to land on the Moon you could not use a parachute anyway, no atmosphere, no air resistance... no parachute. If I had the opportunity to land on the moon/mars but had to listen to that shit music I would have to refuse

[omega4chimp]

Hurry up i won't to see this shit in my life time,meby a giant space rocket fuel pipeline would make things quicker then you wouldn't need to go back to earthy to refuel you space ships and shit.

[TheSaulos]

@omega4chimp if your talking about from the earths surface to orbit, they would never be able to construct a pipeline like that... think about the altitude it would have to reach and remain stable... think about wind... air traffic... maintenance... potential risks, not to mention the volume and pressure needed to send the right amount to refuel at the correct flow rate - it just wouldn't work... well not in our lifetime anyway.

[OrogDeMalfur]

this is pussy shit, you need to stay on the moon. its gonna take the earth as a whole to do it too, its really getting old with boring shit. lets get a fucking space colony going! I WANT STAR TREK BATTLESTATION WITH A SHIPYARD AND A SATELLITE RING AROUND THE EARTH LIKE IN STARSHIP TROOPERS!!!

[stain581c]

what does africa have to do with the moon?!?

[tanarus77]

People need to dig deeper and look at the bigger picture. Quit chasing shadows maybe one day you will wake up!

[mreduardolaranja]

gostei,mas porque demorou tanto para se pensar em voltar à Lua?

[ziggycat999]

President Obama killed a future.

[RancidElf32]

Haha this isn't gonna happen cause Obama totally undermined NASA and cut their budget. now NASA is helping Toyota with its recalls...Its TOTAL BS... Oh and I agree with "TheJomogogo" Same with Hati we sent them like 50 aid vehicles and they're still sitting at the airport rusting away.

[monokhem]

@RancidElf32 Obama actualy increased NASA's budget. he cancelled Constilation because it had never been funded properly and was highly wastfull. His flexable plan untilizing comercial craft and compitition will get us there a lot faster.

[ThirdRomeAquilo]

you can make liquid hydrogen fuel from tap water... come on folks, lets populate the solar system ourselves.

[kirbsnz]

no new innovation what so ever!!! 40 year old concept.

[rangamats]

A moonbase? will it happen our lifetime? what's the view lately

[Darko2625]

@rangamats It will...but bases will build Russia and China. Obama fucked things up.

[Ciao1984]

But the capsule LAND ON MARS!?

[bagofbarn]

@Ciao1984 oops!!!

[myxoluser]

Why do they have "sound" in space?? C'mon NASA.

It's a little weird that after 30+ years NASA is just now sending someone back to the moon. My iMac has more processing power than the space shuttle did back then. So it shows that lesser technology can do extraordinary things. Lack of money? Huh, the government could of print more, just like today.Billion here, a billion there.

Or maybe man has already built a moon base and they are just now mocking the mission just for the "public" sake. ??

[nitinsam14]

i would b happy if we tried to lift off using magnetic propulsion systems...!

[mattluvsmud1989]

hmmmm,.... sorta looked like mars at the end...

[Omega3chimp]

We should have like a one world space agency and Hotels on the moons.

[Pvic]

no, we need separate agencies to ensure competition. Thus incentive for innovation.

[JackRABBITslim27]

And would you not agree that if we are to expand to space. It must be 2 times safer with more back ups if somthing fails than the projected plan..If that is done space can become more ruetine and hospitable..Which I think you would agree is paramount for a moon base like there talking bout on this video..I DO NOT SEE how this proposed method in anyway makes it anymore safer or reliable then the dreaded APOLLIO 13..From my observation the same thing could happen to this

[JackRABBITslim27]

And is too the gaps of launch dates..I dont belive this would be an issue..It would be just as the same as the ones proposed for this..Not like we would be launching them back to back

[JackRABBITslim27]

I agree with th risk of the shuttle heat shield..But I think you think that im talking about the huge flying brick shuttle were using now..Im talking about one at least half the size of the current one..One that can fit in a rocket were its protected from debris on launch..Doesnt that dismiss the mass and heat sheild Claim

[JackRABBITslim27]

I think if we as humans have to make big leaps...Safe leaps offcourse. But NASA need to think big..Not what appears to be modified tech from the 60'S & 70's..I just think using tech from past instead of creating and new and relolutionary tech is a bad way foward..Dont you think so

[ZaneKaminski]

60's spacecraft are often more reliable than today's. Look at the Soyuz. The original Soyuz flew in 1966, and modified versions of that spacecraft still fly today. Soyuz's operations are mostly automated (like docking and descent), and it nobody has died on a Soyuz in 38 years.

[JackRABBITslim27]

You launch an Cargo/Booster ship into space.Then launch the crew.Which would be in a lighter and smaller shuttle type ship.The crew ship docks with cargo/Booster Ship.The whole ship flys to the moon.Then the moon team takes a lander which would be attacthed to the nose of shuttle & land on the moon.After there done they dock with the orbiting shuttle.Then return home,shuttle lands to be re-used for future planetary missions. Id like to hear how this isnt a better option

[ZaneKaminski]

Orion's reeentry module will be reusable up to 10 times. It just does not have wings, and so cannot precisely target a landing site like the Shuttle does.

However, this is a little bit of a plus. If it were completely reusable, we'd have to return the entire weight of the spacecraft, not just the reentry module, resulting in a heavier spacecraft (because of its bigger heatshield), facilitating the need for larger rockets, which would delay the gap in US manned spaceflight.

[tomanyasses]

there other ways of lift off not useing fuel or needing bigger engines

[ZaneKaminski]

Furthermore, a winged vehicle like the shuttle would expose its heatshield during launch. That alone is responsible for the death of 7 Americans on Columbia...

With a capsule, the heatshield is protected during launch and also when on-orbit, until right before re-entry, minimizing the damage that can be done to it, and therefore maximizing safety.

[ZaneKaminski]

The CG is nice, but the physics in this video are not accurate.

[JackRABBITslim27]

What I dont undrstand why are NASA trying to still use the Same Methods from the Apollo Missions..Ud think we would have figured out an better way of going to the Moon..Why not a new type of Shuttle with an Lander in it.. The shuttle Orbits the moon while the lander in its crew work on the moon..Then leave back to shuttle to land back o earth..Plus shuttle can carrie more supplies to moon and back up the moon crew..I think NASA is being lazy Again...

[ZaneKaminski]

Nonsense.

The shuttle cannot go to the moon.

It weighs like 105 tons. Too heavy.

And anyway, it's not laziness. If this were possible with the Shuttle, we wouldn't need to create two new launch vehicles and two new spacecraft...

[JackRABBITslim27]

I agree shuttle is heavy..But in space its weight isnt a factor..And i didnt mean the current shuttle..I Meant an smaller type o shuttle

[ZaneKaminski]

Weight is related to mass. And mass is important.

F=MA. As mass increases, the force required to accelerate that mass increases.

Plus, the only proven manned re-entry vehicle from lunar distances is a capsule shape (like Apollo's or even Soyuz's, as used during the Zond program).

[plutosunshine]

W.O.M.B.A.T

[numantunak]

YOU ARE COMPLETELY WRONG...

[plutosunshine]

but at what cost....couldn,t.these very clever and intellegent people work on the problems on earth first.... ment no offence...enjoyed these pages....maybe if they just didn,t have an open cheque book

[kevadekene]

george bush makes me happy, xD

[numantunak]

same here!

[sheepd0g317]

what a gigantic wast of 100 billion dollars! jeez there's hundreds of thousands of starving people living in places that we almost fail to even acknowledge there existence and were over here with our nice soft beds and hundreds of other things that we take for granted every day. If we took the money that we spend on entertainment for ONE day we could probably feed one of those people for an entire week

[shletten]

Call me a bastard if you want but if everyone on the planet was as rich and favorized as an american we'd be 20 bilion people and we'd run out of petrol, food, free territories in a matter of time not to mention that our climate would terribly suffer from it. We're 6 billion right now and I don't think we need to be more.

[RappelzFighter]

here is something a lot of people miss. if south America's plans and fields were commercialized in the right manner, we could feed 6 billion people 12 times over. and that's ONLY food from south america. it's because they get something like 6-9 feet of rain every year. also there are tons of cheep CURES to diseases that the USA gov won't allow out to the world. look up MMS/ Jim humble and do not take my word for it, research and learn the truth.

[shletten]

Interesting but seriously we're enough humans as it is don't you find?

[TheJomogogo]

We send Africa billions a year in food and aid, been doing it for decades, and they just piss it away and demand more. Not that they're the least bit grateful.  So fuck them.

[seeshell3811]

@TheJomogthere are people in control playing both sides, keeping war famine,drought, & etc going, & the fact that technology exists to control weather, yet we let them suffer in drought,pillage their oil while China supplies arms to the factions fighting, & we put billions into the unnecessary -For example, a $200,000,000 movie. what's more important?the movie that keeps you in a coma for 2 hours, or sending relief where it is needed?i hope u don't need help some day, & people just pass you by!

[TheJomogogo]

@seeshell3811

LOL @ "technology exists to control weather" man you are dreaming we don't have anything of the sort.

[seeshell3811]

Are you familiar with HAARP? Earth Quakes in Haiti & China are supposed examples.The guy who invented it said his biggest regret was giving it to U.S.government. It  has components for weather modification, Hologram's,& mind control, It can pick 1 person in the WORLD & filter things in your mind, like make u think Jesus is talking to you & you have no idea it isn't Jesus. They used it in the 1st Gulf war to get those troops to stand down by faking Allah ordering them to surrender.research it.

[TheJomogogo]

@seeshell3811

Wow dude your tin foil hat is on too tight

[numantunak]

@seeshell3811 You ACTUALLY believe we have mind-control and would use it to make people say that their god is telling them to surrender? If they were to surrender for that "reason" it would be a cover up of them being scared.

[rdt1970]

@TheJomogogo hmm have to agree to a point with you but twhat they do do is sell the aid and buy guns then shoot each other bonkers when we could spend it on ways to explore the planets and create a space industry that would give us all jobs

[MrSBChevy]

@TheJomogogo yeah i know wat u mean. we send them fuckers money, food and aid , while we have war homeless war veterans and americans going hungry.

so the government will feed other countries while we have americans going hungry?

i like how our country works, its bull crap man.

[doggypound1]

@TheJomogogo

If you really think the situation in Africa is that simple and clear-cut, then your ignorance is simply astounding..........Typical American attitude towards world affairs,especailly towards brown people........



[MisterClassified]

@doggypound1 Can I hear a bit of racism from your side? :)

[flynetz]

@TheJomogogo

maybe they will be grateful if we also stop to send weapons to all that groups of niggas that goin around to kill and rape and guess what? yes take the 99% of food and aid we sent over there.

[numantunak]

so, it is AMERICA's JOB to FEED OTHER countries!? NO! It is THEIR countries job!

You remind me of the people who think that we should pay for other's Health insurance...

[seeshell3811]

@numantunak u remind me of... I won't say, it would be judging you on one comment. I'm not saying it is our job at all. It has nothing to do with the U.S., it has more to do with people & how we can so easily shut our eyes to others suffering by no fault of their own. They don't vote their leaders in power, they live under dictators, & we do business with them when it suits us.arms, oil, diamonds, it is a bigger picture then your generalized response. can i ask, how old you are? just curious?

[numantunak]

@seeshell3811 So, even though they have a corrupt government that doesn't do anything for them, WE must feed them? Lets see here, 10 billion dollars spent on science or space exploration has a great outcome. 10 billion dollars of food won't feed but a few meals for only a certain amount of people for a limited amount of time.

[numantunak]

@seeshell3811 Would it be your buisness if your best friend was being bosses around by his wife? sure, you could be a kind friend and talk to him. It would be wrong to go to her tell her what she is doing wrong and then give your friend what was taken away - that is his job, and I've seen it ruin many couples.

[numantunak]

anyways, why FEED them when we can TEACH them to get food, sure, there are SOME places that food cant be grown, but they find ways.

give a man a fish, he will eat for a day, TEACH a man to fish, he will eat forever.

[Diabolous3x]

you mean the first journey to the moon

[kamaaladiin]

sending robots to the moon to take some sample its funny why would u send robots and u send human before like 40 years ago . that shows it was fake the 40 years ago mission

[MulherRockeirahBR]

the first moon landing is done by chinese [2].totally agree. USA..lied.

[FuckCumInHeaven]

SHIT! This doesn't explain anything!

[CheerBoyX1]

when is this happening??

[dynamiz77]

soon.

[12GaugeLosAngeles]

Fake ass a seven dollar bill. Get ready for another MOVIE. They still have area51 desert (where the original fake landing was recorded to do more bullshit). Why we want to work there? This is a 21st century JOKE. Can't wait to live out this joke.

[BioHunter1990]

hold your tongue cur! The moon landing was real.

[dingyanzimaoyan]

the first moon lnding is done by chinese

[jackyachayan]

4. Man has been to moon and there are secret bases (man made or alien) on the moon. But NASA also carried out a fake mission so that if ever someone comes to know that there are bases on the moon, NASA can use the 2nd argument to discredit man's mission to moon. [Richard Hoagland]

God alone knows what is the truth. However, one thing is apparent from several highly credible sources, that is:

NASA has been lying to the public for atleast 30 years or more...

[donruggeropaterno]

man never sent people to the moon,there's a loot of proves about it, I just ask myself,why them lie in a loot of things,instead of show us the real true.

[jackyachayan]

Actually, I have come across 4 different versions of moon missions since my school days:

1. The most popular belief that man landed on moon in 1969 which I learned in school.

2. Man never landed on the moon and all the photographs were fake which I learned and seen later from some other sources. The arguments are very strong for that case.

3. Either man has never been to moon OR the moon has atmosphere. Also there are secret bases on the moon [Wiliam Cooper].

4. .....contd..

[FRAG10tube]

Because they ARE showing us the truth!

We've been there so many times, and people just can't believe a single bit that humans have gotten this far.

[n1ckmcclure]

Damn dude, there are a loot of proves? Wow.

[jackyachayan]

Why has NASA never sent man to moon since 69?

[MewFushisDad]

Politics.

It was all about beating the Russians to the moon.

There wasn't the will among our leaders to continue at what we started.

We are 40 years behind where we could have been.

[marwood03]

The last man that went to the moon was in 1972

[tharshan04]

I like learning about moon and planets thank you for adding this video very clear and high quality. keep it up.