since every1 here is a God hater, i guess i need to vouch for him. The thing is, your supposesd to go on faith alone. He didn't leave any prove of his existince for a reason. You guys are all to focused on science. And No im not boycoting science and logic. But in the end, after all the proof you find in the universe on how he is nowhere to be seen, he'll be sitting right in front of your face. Im watching this because i love a good laugh not to argue about what's there and what's not
Your first line there... God is almighty remember? He can stand up for himself thankyouverymuch. Although he might not be able to take a joke, true. I guess the devil invented humor.. And your last line.. You ARE arguing, dont be hypocritical.
@moneshmahtani lol what??? ricky gervais bashes everybody, maybe worse the jimmy. Ricky even gets personal which is something jimmy doesnt do. golden globes?
u tards...believe in God but dont believe in the church because the church is full of people who wants to control weak minded and they have pedophiles among them...so i say f.o. church
@Mahnahmahnahful - It's Jimmy Carr, the main feat of his humour is of course his offensiveness; I'm LGBT and he's one of my favourite comedians. However when a comedian is genuinely racist/homophobic/sexist, that's a completely different story.
I'm an Atheist...but I just don't understand why Christians always think God is white...I don't believe in it but if there is a God than he'll probably be or asian. And even worse is that most Christians still think Jesus was white :P LOSERS...do you really think a man born in Israel is white xD hahaha the church just made him white because they think white is the superior race :S I'm white too but what the hell..there is no difference in people THERE IS NO GOD NOR JESUS! Peace
Hey fucktards, there is no evidence one way or the other of the existence of God. And being religious or atheistic has no direct correlation to your morality. And there is no real FUNDAMENTAL difference between science and religion. "What?! BULLSHIT!!" Every argument you can come up with that says they are different can instantly be shot down--at least if you know what you're talking about. They're both just trying to seek the truth--which you're not going to find on the internet.
@allamericandude15 Science has something no religion has: evidence, open discussion of experimental facts, argument over rank, no infallibility, falsifiability and testable hypothesis. Science is what we do if we do *not* want to fool ourselves. Religion on the other hand is nothing but wishful thinking.
@TomFynn You think I didn't know about that argument before I typed my comment? You can't use that argument to definitively differentiate between science and religion because--in a nutshell, because I'm low on space--there are too many exceptions in either case. And I'm not talking about the difference between science and a specific religion like Scientology or the Flying Spaghetti Monster--just the general belief that there is some sort of supreme being.
@allamericandude15 "there are too many exceptions in either case" And those are? What evidence is there of some supreme being? What falsifiable hypothesis precise enough to be tested? What experimental results?
@TomFynn You can not use falsifiability as an argument against religion, because there are some core scientific concepts that are unfalsifiable. Take the basic idea of "survival of the fittest". This can be reworded as "Those that survive, survive." This is absolutely true in all cases, so it can not be falsified. However, even though Evolutionary Theory contains several unfalsifiable concepts like that, the theory is not invalid.
@allamericandude15 PS: You have no idea what Evolution is. Read some books: Richard Dawkins "The Greatest Show on Earth", Jerry Coyne "Why Evolution is True", Ernst Mayr "What Evolution Is" or Neil Shubin."Your inner fish"
@TomFynn One thing I want to make clear is that I am NOT trying to claim that science is wrong or religion is right or anything like that. I'm just talking about the fundamental DIFFERENCE between the two--or lack thereof.
The point that I was trying to make with String Theory is that--even though it IS founded on logical mathematics--it is still an unproven but unfalsifiable theory. String Theory is merely an explanation of certain observations--which is also exactly what the Theory of God is.
@allamericandude15 God is not a "Theory" It is something that was pulled out of some bodily orifice to get around having to admit "I do not know". "God did it" cannot *in principle* explain anything, and is *in principle* untestable and unfalsifiable.
String theory *has* explanatory power. And there is nothing that suggest that it is *in principle* untestable.
@TomFynn I stopped because it was apparent you were not going to take this conversation seriously. But if you want me to keep going, I will. Just say so.
@TomFynn Well, okay then. You said "god" is not a theory because it is simply an explanation for something we don't know or understand. Well, isn't that what all theories are? They're just explanations for observed events. The observation, in this case, is "the universe exists, so it must have come from somewhere." One theory to explain this observation is that a god created it. THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT THE ONLY VIABLE THEORY, as you know very well, but it IS a theory with "explanatory power".
@allamericandude15 God is not a "Theory" since there is *no* experimental evidence that supports it, no evidence that can *in principle* falsify it. And no testable predictions can be inferred from it. Furthermore, at no point does the "theory" explain "how" god did it. Which is the point of a theory.
Theory--The analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another.
Nowhere does it say (and not just in that dictionary) that a theory necessarily has to be testable. Like I said--a theory is just an explanation of certain events. I could create a theory that says all of reality was created 5 seconds ago complete with false memories and historical records. It's a theory. It's untestable and unfalsifiable. But of course that doesn't necessarily make it true.
@allamericandude15 Theory: A body of concepts with explanatory power, allowing for the derivation of precise predictions, verified over years by independent measurement and different researches, although one single experiment could - in principle - falsify it.
And don't start on string theory again, that's work in progress.
@allamericandude15 As for the universe, since the angular fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background, the gravitational lensing of galaxy clusters and the redshift of type Ia supernovae it is clear that the space-time geometry of the universe is flat. Such a universe has a total energy balance (kinetic and potential) of zero. Therefore the universe needs a creator in the same way the generation of particle-antiparticle pairs: In none whatsoever.
@TomFynn And I want to stress again that I am NOT saying that science is wrong. I believe in evolution, the big bang, etc, etc. I'm just talking about the lack of difference between the fundamental structures of science and religion.
@allamericandude15 Lack of differences? Which religion then has evidence? Or even bothers with it? Which knows *how* God did it? Which is *in principle* falsifiable?
@TomFynn What is evidence? All evidence is is a basis or validation for a belief. If your theory is "My dog ate my homework", then your evidence is your lack of homework. If your theory is "Aliens cause Mt. Vesuvius to erupt every 200 years", your evidence is Mt. Vesuvius's eruption cycle. If your theory is "God created the universe", then your evidence is...the universe.
Every religion has evidence, otherwise there would be no cause for the belief. The same thing happens in science.
@allamericandude15 Evidence: that which everyone can see on which basis a prediction can be tested and eventually be falsified. Making stuff up does not count.
@TomFynn I think there's a bit of confusion here. I think you're saying "God is not a theory" because you disagree with religion. But there's a difference between "theories" and "laws". Theories don't have to be correct. Theories can be made up out of the blue--because they're JUST ideas. Laws are ideas that--as you say--have been proven correct with experimentation and can accurately predict future events. Theories don't have to meet those requirements. If they do, they become laws.
@TomFynn@NamelessMIAyt Sorry, you're right, I was being a bit too general. Hypotheses can be made up. Theories are summaries of hypotheses if those hypotheses are verifiable. Laws are proven theories.
But (and I'm talking to TomFynn now) even by that definition, a THEORY can still be wrong. All a theory does is draw a conclusion from a series of hypotheses. Even if the tests you did for the hypotheses were correct, the conclusion can be wrong.
@allamericandude15 Shut up you stupid fucking twat. Who gives a fuck if god exist. the reason for the clip is comedy. Go and find a corner somewhere and curl up and die you ANAL RETENTIVE COCK SUCKING CUNT. AND STOP FUCKING YOUR MA.
@allamericandude15 Actually that's a common misconception but a theory is not something made up out of the blue. In order for something to be a theory it must be proven through documented experimentation by different scientists. The only difference between a theory and a law is that laws have been proven without a shadow of a doubt, while theories have been proven over and over again and are used for predictions, but it is impossible to prove that they are absolute.
@NamelessMIAyt Handy Tip: Do not get hung up on words: There is no difference between a law and a theory. And yes, theories can be wrong. That's the difference between science and religion. In science you can be wrong. In religion you can only be *told* to be wrong.
@TomFynn I disagree, theories and laws are different categories of information. a law is a statement about an observed phenomenon. a theory is an explanation based on all the evidence, including laws. for instance, the theory of evolution explains the diversity of life on the planet and is based on all the evidence. evolution does include several laws which is explains, such as the law of natural selection.
@NamelessMIAyt actually the difference between a law and a theory is that a law is an observed phenomenon while a theory is an explanation of why it occurs. for instance, there is the law of gravity, and there is the theory of gravity. the law of gravity, in basically what goes up, attraction etc etc. the theory of gravity explains why this thing happens.
@TomFynn Another example is String Theory. It is unfalsifiable, yet it has been warmly accepted into the scientific community. It can not be proved nor disproved, but the scientific community holds on to it because it fits their observations. (Does that sound familiar to you? A bit like religion, maybe? Think about it for a second.)
@allamericandude15 String theory is based on sound mathematical procedure and each step can be retraced by *anyone*. Allowing for intellect and education. Furthermore string theory is developed to not only fit the known facts about particles, but fit them based on as few assumptions as possible *but not fewer*. That's good science. Whether it matches the physics remains to be seen.
Even if God was real which is probably the most doubtful thing in the universe, I think Jimmy Carr would have a better chance of getting into heaven than some of the leeches in the comments because he makes people laugh. And if God really is omniscient and can do everything, I'm sure he can manage a sense of humor.
Just throwing in my two pence, when it comes to life I'm an Atheist, Darwinism, Pro-Choice, Science and all that shizz. When it comes to death, I guess we would say Agnostic, because, lets be honest, no-one really knows what happens when we die. Whether we cease to exist or go to an afterlife or are reincarnated.
@TheLuckiestClover :) you need to sort your shit, you can't be both. what you just described is agnostic, i think. but if you're so into science how can you still believe that reincarnation is possible? how would you explain the consciousness of someone who's just died going into the fetus in a woman's womb? and then when it grows up, he/she can't remember anything from the previous life anyway? how is that not wishful thinking because you're afraid of death and choose to pretend it's not real?
@MuhammedKhan9 Atheists scum? Last I checked Atheists didn't kill thousands of blacks, women, gays, and anyone different just because their big white human male imaginary friend in the sky told them "SLAVE, WITCH, HERETIC!"
Plus heaven and hell are so backwards, if being gay is against gods will, then why does he live in a cloud kingdom with pearly gates and a rainbow throne?
Christianity is full of contradictions, and denying it proves a lack of a 9th grade education.
@Ultrox007 the cloud kingdom and the pearly gates and the rainbow throne are an integral part of your argument? Besides have you heard of Stalin, Pol Pot and Mau?
@BlueShadowIaido no ,they're not a serious part of my arguement, it's just a funny low blow I have for the anti-gay christians that are out there. Yes I have heard of Stalin, and Mau (Pol Pot not so much sadly) and I agree on their outlooks of religion needing to be removed, I however do NOT agree with their practices of doing so. Also I could easily turn the religious tables around, after all, how many still talk about stalin as opposed to hitler or 9/11.?
@Ultrox007 You see there I generalised atheists, like you generalised non-atheists. Double standards is quite an annoying thing right? I'm also finding it difficult discerning attempts at being witty and actual ignorance in your posts, but you do realise the connection between the superior Aryan ideology and evolution right? Concerning 9/11 you're putting all religions/faiths in one pot and blaming them all.
@BlueShadowIaido Idk, because I didn't really take offense like at all to it, I know there's some people that are just crappy people and I accept that, what I don't like is when those people create a whole teaching of being crappy bigots. And it wasn't really trying to be witty or being ignorant, it was trying to rush out a thought while in a library. and considering the 9/11 joke, it's more getting to the point that "not just christians" (however 9/11 is a whole other story.)
@BlueShadowIaido Also, there's multiple people that commented on this, mine was just (apparently) the most popular response. I'm all up for debate and such, but debating religion is like arguing with a brick wall nothing new will come to light and neither will budge from their spot until one of the two walks away and leaves it alone (note: either can be the wall)
I just wanted to make a point at the person who was being a dick about their religion and acting so typical about it
@Ultrox007 Trying to talk reason with a religious person is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn't matter how much you care about the game and no matter how much you play by the rules, the pigeon will just knock over all the pieces, shit all over the board and strut around like it won.
@PeculiarAxolotl I cannot reiterate this enough when religious people come to me and complain about how I don't believe in god, either leave me alone or be prepared to lose the argument.
@ThunderSpartan117 Maybe your problem is that you know religious people that complain about you not believing in God? I don't like Salt Lake City either.
@BlueShadowIaido My final note (I hate the character limit on youtube) your "Mau" and "Stalin" examples (just for a second) their people feared and somewhat hated them (if I'm correct) while the religious leaders were more like the nazis (blindly following a horrible regime in belief that they were a master race) my main thought regarding that is the witch trials and crusade... and all of the dark ages...
I'm not TRYING to be a dick about it, I'm just negative about everything
Ok here is my thing with any belief including being an athiest. My little cousin said God Bless you to an Athiest and he continued to yell at her and tell her she was a moron for believing in god. Of course the same thing can go for religious people. I just hate it when people are almost angry with their belief. Like "hey I don't belive in god" "YOU WILL BE CONDEMED TO THE DEPTHS OF HELL FOR YOU ILL MINDED SOUL!!!!!" seriously chill out. Let people make their own decisions.
I dislike Atheists and Theists. Atheists bash on Theists for believing in God via faith. Yet the hypocrisy in that statement is that science and everything we know is based on faith (NOTHING can be 100% True). Atheism is actually based on faith! I know, how ironic! You can not prove that something is not there but you can assume it's not. Sounds familiar to faith right? So anyone here who says one or another is wrong should actually educate themselves.
@sbaeagles15 Atheist do not assume the something isnt true, we reject the assumptions of others until there is further proof. There is no assumption, but a lack thereof. Also, Empirical proofs, like Ohms law, are 100% true. The gravitational constant. Polarity of water.
@sbaeagles15 (1) Claiming that it takes faith, to not believe something that has no evidence, is backwards. (2) Facts do not require faith. If I drop something, it will fall at 9.8 m/s2 - a testable, verifiable, repeatable scientific fact. When science is not certain, it says so. Otherwise, it's pseudoscience that requires faith.
Just read a few comments on this thread and I'm ashamed to be a human being. I'm an atheist yet have never thrown my beliefs down anyone's throats unlike our religious friends, but people can't see the real reason we have wars across the world. Does Mr America,UK, Ethiopia etc have the right to claim the larger knowledge of how someone else feels and what they believe in? Few questions I ask all of you.... do you not breathe the same air and piss in the same water? Does your shit not smell?
Well since everyone is shouting opinions I guess I'll have a go. There's nothing at all wrong with "having faith" in something. The problem is that things like the Bible aren't being presented as "something to have faith in". They are being presented as absolute fact. Think whatever you like. Have faith in whatever. But when you say something is a fact you better be ready to back it up with some kind of evidence.
@TheJDorian Just to play devil's advocate here for fun: I'd say they're about equal. Loch Ness: photos of a lake with an object in the water that people say is a creature. God: burnt toast that people say has the face of Jesus in it. There. Bet you didn't expect a comment like that XD
@Hayles46: The reason is that most people are too much of children to respect opinions and understand where to draw a line. Nothing is wrong with faith unless people use it as a source of power (or any other form of harmful reasoning). If faith makes someone happy, and they live out logical, philosophical lives then so be it. However, for some reason, most people seem to see some bad apples of religion or atheism; and then completely judge all others based on that bad example. Childish really.
beware of youtube user Megazordman2 who posts insluting comments on christianity on videos. Please go to his channel youtube dot com slash megazordman2 and report him 20-30 times a day until he is perma banned. Stop letting these kids get away with it.
@tzsitfhio lol I knew I'd get a comment like that. By the way its catholicism. There is no such thing as catholicism, that's like saying jewism. My comment was sarcastic.
@Historian66669 lol I knew I'd get a comment like that. By the way its catholicism. There is no such thing as catholicism, that's like saying jewism. My comment was sarcastic.
I dont really like arguing about this but cmon. A god? I bet the people who wrote it were drunk and thought "I got an idea! Lets write a story about a man who created us and lets see if people will belive in it" and the others were probably like "this is gonna to be the greatest prank of all time". If you belive in god then you should also belive in unicorns since they exist in books. There hasnt been and never will be any proof of a god existing. Evolution theory has some explanations at least.
Love how everyone is arguing about religion and atheism here...I think it's nice if you believe in a religion as it's nice to believe in something, even though I don't believe in religion, even though it can bring good and bad to others.
I'm not atheist because I don't care if god exists or not. If I die and there is a god and an afterlife I'm in for a nice surprise and if not, well I'm dead aren't I? :)
@hempartist420 before the war, every home had a radio and cars were becomming more readily accessible to all people and their ecconomy was booming. So for the most part,, Germany was one of the best economies in the world at that time
To put this short. Faith means to believe in something without the proof of existence. Basically you are delusional for believing in imaginary friends :)
@Absuleet Sooo basically you're being a douche trying to call out people who believe in god, instead of being the bigger person and going about your business
@Absuleet See, no you didn't if you would have said "To put this short. Faith means to believe in something without the proof of existence." That's stating the truth, and only the truth. By adding "Basically you are delusional for believing in imaginary friends :)" you're being a douche
@Absuleet It's not like you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God doesn't exist either, the rational choice is to believe that God exists. If you don't believe and God does exists, you're screwed. If you believe and it turns out there is no God, well what have you got to lose? It's the rational bet.
@Carefreeblues The possibilities of some invisible guy who can heal and make miracles happen is not likely. It has been proven that evolution is the reason behind everything. :)
@liverpoolmatt87 Unless you actually want to have an argument, I'd say that YOU are in fact brainwashed and arrogant to the point that you can't actually consider the possibility of a being that is greater than yourself.
@Carefreeblues There is a possibility, of course. Just like we are "greater" than dogs there could be being greater than us. But the proof for their existence?
@Absuleet your an idiot, you completely missed what i was saying.
ok ill speak in simple and plain words this time.
do you believe youll be happy in the future? do you think youll find the person you love before you die? what makes you think tomorrow is not the day that you die?
see if you had completely no faith in these at all. you will never wake up in the morning with a smile on your face. the thing is, you find "faith" synonymous to "religion"
@missionpupa A: Idc if I am happy in the future. B: Idc if I find the person I love before I die. C: Idc if I die tomorrow. All the crap you speak of is for paranoid people. I just live life and let it take me wherever it goes. GF :)
@Absuleet ok you are officially a moron, what i was talking about is a fact. im not gonna waste my time explaining to someone with a narrow point of view in that little head of yours because you will never get it. feel annoyed and sorry for you at the same time. ciao
@Adv3z You mean the bible which is supposed to be older than you and you cannot prove that anything in the bible is true and not to mention that the bible has been rewritten.
@Absuleet xD i know right, btw i am actually atheist, i guess considering how stupid some christians are my joking arguments don't seem to far-fetched xD
@youngfeniansofeire please refer to my other previous comment where i told the person i originally replyed to how i was joking and am actually an atheist
in fact i just recently finished reading the god delusion
Many argue that a world without religion would no longer impede progress. All I can say to that is look at Stalin's "progress", and that is what you could very well have (again) if religions were gone. And to Iuf4rall there just doesn't so "happen" to be Catholic charities, charity is one of the principal teachings of Catholicism.
@AFMader Stalin made Russia one of the forefronts in the time by his methods. I am not justifying them but he did make progress in the country as did Hitler. ANYONE who says different is biased against the TRUTH by governments who would willinng start a war just because Daddy felt insulted
Both Stalin and Lenin believed that, to create a perfect and just society, one must do away with religion (sound familiar atheists?). My point is that under an atheist ruler, millions of people had suffered and died with Stalin caring not the slightest for their plight, rather, working them to death. Under both Stalin and Hitler religious people were persecuted against because they slowed progress (at least in their eyes).
I find it so sad that you would implicate God for encouraging Hitler to start the Holocaust, while at the same time covering Stalin's tracks by saying he was motivated by politics and not by belief. That's because he had no beliefs. To Stalin, there was no God and therefore no authority superior to his own which could punish him with eternal damnation for his many years of brutal rule.
can't hear the word ringleader any more now
jpjpd 2 days ago
since every1 here is a God hater, i guess i need to vouch for him. The thing is, your supposesd to go on faith alone. He didn't leave any prove of his existince for a reason. You guys are all to focused on science. And No im not boycoting science and logic. But in the end, after all the proof you find in the universe on how he is nowhere to be seen, he'll be sitting right in front of your face. Im watching this because i love a good laugh not to argue about what's there and what's not
Farter10015 1 week ago
@Farter10015 noone cares
GROGOLOG 1 week ago
@Farter10015 the proof of unicorns and crab people is that they are no where to be seen
milzitothegreat 4 days ago
@Farter10015
Your first line there... God is almighty remember? He can stand up for himself thankyouverymuch. Although he might not be able to take a joke, true. I guess the devil invented humor.. And your last line.. You ARE arguing, dont be hypocritical.
dirkschuitsma 22 hours ago
I came for the anti-religious jokes, I stayed for the chess jokes.
sallyluv42 2 weeks ago 7
love how he says whateva,
ColleeenOneillXO 2 weeks ago
@PeculiarAxolotl that sounds soo fucking familiar.
SenorCockblock 3 weeks ago
1:34 Everyone missed that! NUTS lolololol xP
MrFunxy 3 weeks ago
@MrFunxy I didn't really hear it,what did he say?
Christian121y 2 weeks ago
@Christian121y
....nuts....
MrFunxy 2 weeks ago
jimmy carr is an asshole ricky gervais FTW
moneshmahtani 3 weeks ago
@moneshmahtani lol what??? ricky gervais bashes everybody, maybe worse the jimmy. Ricky even gets personal which is something jimmy doesnt do. golden globes?
Gellis2009 2 weeks ago
CHESS JOKES FTW!!!!!!!!!
TheLockon00 3 weeks ago
@PeculiarAxolotl Is that your own? Fuck! It's like Tim Minchin sent out his own Jesus!
newtownlegends 3 weeks ago
I, as a proud Catholic, find this hilarious!
ITS A JOKE PEOPLE DONT GET UR PANTIES IN A BUNCH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
garrrrity 3 weeks ago
@garrrrity You belong to that filthy religion, and you actually laugh ? Thats the weirdest thing ive ever heard
crushni 3 weeks ago
u tards...believe in God but dont believe in the church because the church is full of people who wants to control weak minded and they have pedophiles among them...so i say f.o. church
bljaa91 1 month ago
Well, this is mostly homophobic.
Mahnahmahnahful 1 month ago
@Mahnahmahnahful - It's Jimmy Carr, the main feat of his humour is of course his offensiveness; I'm LGBT and he's one of my favourite comedians. However when a comedian is genuinely racist/homophobic/sexist, that's a completely different story.
Flam3o 1 month ago
LETS ALL HAVE A DEBATE ON THE EXISTANCE OF GOD IN THE COMMENTS PAGE OF A JIMMY CARR STAND UP VIDEO ON YOUTUBE.
THAT'LL BE PRODUCTIVE ;D
EmperorBubba 1 month ago 126
@EmperorBubba Such is the internet.
SoggyPoridge 1 month ago
@EmperorBubba I LOVE LAMP
sillychops 2 weeks ago
@sillychops
LOUD NOISES ;D
EmperorBubba 2 weeks ago
@EmperorBubba idiot
mrnoodleisdead 2 weeks ago
@mrnoodleisdead
... um, steaming pile of festering cuntmuck.
ok, your turn.
EmperorBubba 2 weeks ago
@EmperorBubba Mushrooms are god. There ya go.
thedarkshitstain 2 weeks ago
@EmperorBubba Nothing with the word God in a subject is productive.
Anilithun 3 days ago
The difference between we atheist and christians is that we all had imaginary friends, but we grew up....lol
MotionInMotion1975 1 month ago
Jimmy Carr is awesome.
MotionInMotion1975 1 month ago
@robiniohofc god is not real
Unguidedone 1 month ago
I'm an Atheist...but I just don't understand why Christians always think God is white...I don't believe in it but if there is a God than he'll probably be or asian. And even worse is that most Christians still think Jesus was white :P LOSERS...do you really think a man born in Israel is white xD hahaha the church just made him white because they think white is the superior race :S I'm white too but what the hell..there is no difference in people THERE IS NO GOD NOR JESUS! Peace
TheJoeperd 1 month ago
@TheJoeperd *be black or asian
TheJoeperd 1 month ago
@TheJoeperd Actually Jesus if the tale were true, and he was born in the area spoken of in the Bible, he would be Caucasian Semetic.
SippinonMickeys 1 month ago
Jesus Christ you look amazing~
TheAwesomeOne1ooo 1 month ago
In nomine patris, et filli, et spiritu kooshite govno!
FUCK YEA!
BrutalValor 1 month ago
I grew up Catholic. I still believe in God to this day. I have a sense of humor. This is hilarious :)
TheDylanLyles56 1 month ago
@TheDylanLyles56 FINALLY A NORMAL HUMAN BEING :)
MrGlobalcarrot 1 month ago
Hey fucktards, there is no evidence one way or the other of the existence of God. And being religious or atheistic has no direct correlation to your morality. And there is no real FUNDAMENTAL difference between science and religion. "What?! BULLSHIT!!" Every argument you can come up with that says they are different can instantly be shot down--at least if you know what you're talking about. They're both just trying to seek the truth--which you're not going to find on the internet.
Deal with it.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 Science has something no religion has: evidence, open discussion of experimental facts, argument over rank, no infallibility, falsifiability and testable hypothesis. Science is what we do if we do *not* want to fool ourselves. Religion on the other hand is nothing but wishful thinking.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn You think I didn't know about that argument before I typed my comment? You can't use that argument to definitively differentiate between science and religion because--in a nutshell, because I'm low on space--there are too many exceptions in either case. And I'm not talking about the difference between science and a specific religion like Scientology or the Flying Spaghetti Monster--just the general belief that there is some sort of supreme being.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 "there are too many exceptions in either case" And those are? What evidence is there of some supreme being? What falsifiable hypothesis precise enough to be tested? What experimental results?
None whatsoever.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn You can not use falsifiability as an argument against religion, because there are some core scientific concepts that are unfalsifiable. Take the basic idea of "survival of the fittest". This can be reworded as "Those that survive, survive." This is absolutely true in all cases, so it can not be falsified. However, even though Evolutionary Theory contains several unfalsifiable concepts like that, the theory is not invalid.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 PS: You have no idea what Evolution is. Read some books: Richard Dawkins "The Greatest Show on Earth", Jerry Coyne "Why Evolution is True", Ernst Mayr "What Evolution Is" or Neil Shubin."Your inner fish"
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn One thing I want to make clear is that I am NOT trying to claim that science is wrong or religion is right or anything like that. I'm just talking about the fundamental DIFFERENCE between the two--or lack thereof.
The point that I was trying to make with String Theory is that--even though it IS founded on logical mathematics--it is still an unproven but unfalsifiable theory. String Theory is merely an explanation of certain observations--which is also exactly what the Theory of God is.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 God is not a "Theory" It is something that was pulled out of some bodily orifice to get around having to admit "I do not know". "God did it" cannot *in principle* explain anything, and is *in principle* untestable and unfalsifiable.
String theory *has* explanatory power. And there is nothing that suggest that it is *in principle* untestable.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn It's obvious you can't handle the conversation. I'm done.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 you're an idiot
LaterzMcGhee 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 So you ran out of arguments. Already?
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn No, apparently you did. But I'll keep going if you want.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 So you are *not* done? Make up your mind.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn I stopped because it was apparent you were not going to take this conversation seriously. But if you want me to keep going, I will. Just say so.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 I took this conversation seriously. It's not my fault your arguments weren't up to scratch.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn Well, okay then. You said "god" is not a theory because it is simply an explanation for something we don't know or understand. Well, isn't that what all theories are? They're just explanations for observed events. The observation, in this case, is "the universe exists, so it must have come from somewhere." One theory to explain this observation is that a god created it. THAT DOESN'T MAKE IT THE ONLY VIABLE THEORY, as you know very well, but it IS a theory with "explanatory power".
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 God is not a "Theory" since there is *no* experimental evidence that supports it, no evidence that can *in principle* falsify it. And no testable predictions can be inferred from it. Furthermore, at no point does the "theory" explain "how" god did it. Which is the point of a theory.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn From Merriam-Webster:
Theory--The analysis of a set of facts in their relation to one another.
Nowhere does it say (and not just in that dictionary) that a theory necessarily has to be testable. Like I said--a theory is just an explanation of certain events. I could create a theory that says all of reality was created 5 seconds ago complete with false memories and historical records. It's a theory. It's untestable and unfalsifiable. But of course that doesn't necessarily make it true.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 Theory: A body of concepts with explanatory power, allowing for the derivation of precise predictions, verified over years by independent measurement and different researches, although one single experiment could - in principle - falsify it.
And don't start on string theory again, that's work in progress.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 As for the universe, since the angular fluctuations of the cosmic microwave background, the gravitational lensing of galaxy clusters and the redshift of type Ia supernovae it is clear that the space-time geometry of the universe is flat. Such a universe has a total energy balance (kinetic and potential) of zero. Therefore the universe needs a creator in the same way the generation of particle-antiparticle pairs: In none whatsoever.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn And I want to stress again that I am NOT saying that science is wrong. I believe in evolution, the big bang, etc, etc. I'm just talking about the lack of difference between the fundamental structures of science and religion.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 Lack of differences? Which religion then has evidence? Or even bothers with it? Which knows *how* God did it? Which is *in principle* falsifiable?
None. No, these are *not* equal.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn What is evidence? All evidence is is a basis or validation for a belief. If your theory is "My dog ate my homework", then your evidence is your lack of homework. If your theory is "Aliens cause Mt. Vesuvius to erupt every 200 years", your evidence is Mt. Vesuvius's eruption cycle. If your theory is "God created the universe", then your evidence is...the universe.
Every religion has evidence, otherwise there would be no cause for the belief. The same thing happens in science.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 Evidence: that which everyone can see on which basis a prediction can be tested and eventually be falsified. Making stuff up does not count.
Again: X=X => "God did it" IS. NOT. A. THEORY.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn I think there's a bit of confusion here. I think you're saying "God is not a theory" because you disagree with religion. But there's a difference between "theories" and "laws". Theories don't have to be correct. Theories can be made up out of the blue--because they're JUST ideas. Laws are ideas that--as you say--have been proven correct with experimentation and can accurately predict future events. Theories don't have to meet those requirements. If they do, they become laws.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 "Theories don't have to be correct." That is the biggest bullshit I have ever heard and that's saying something.
A "Theory" is not something you make up on the fly. It's the result of years and years of careful research based on mountains of evidence..
What you mean is not even a hypothesis. It's called: talking out of your ass.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn @NamelessMIAyt Sorry, you're right, I was being a bit too general. Hypotheses can be made up. Theories are summaries of hypotheses if those hypotheses are verifiable. Laws are proven theories.
But (and I'm talking to TomFynn now) even by that definition, a THEORY can still be wrong. All a theory does is draw a conclusion from a series of hypotheses. Even if the tests you did for the hypotheses were correct, the conclusion can be wrong.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 Shut up you stupid fucking twat. Who gives a fuck if god exist. the reason for the clip is comedy. Go and find a corner somewhere and curl up and die you ANAL RETENTIVE COCK SUCKING CUNT. AND STOP FUCKING YOUR MA.
robiniohofc 1 month ago
@robiniohofc
1) Calm down.
2) Read my comments again. If you look closely, you'll see that we weren't actually talking about whether or not god was real.
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 Actually that's a common misconception but a theory is not something made up out of the blue. In order for something to be a theory it must be proven through documented experimentation by different scientists. The only difference between a theory and a law is that laws have been proven without a shadow of a doubt, while theories have been proven over and over again and are used for predictions, but it is impossible to prove that they are absolute.
NamelessMIAyt 1 month ago
@NamelessMIAyt Handy Tip: Do not get hung up on words: There is no difference between a law and a theory. And yes, theories can be wrong. That's the difference between science and religion. In science you can be wrong. In religion you can only be *told* to be wrong.
TomFynn 1 month ago
@TomFynn I disagree, theories and laws are different categories of information. a law is a statement about an observed phenomenon. a theory is an explanation based on all the evidence, including laws. for instance, the theory of evolution explains the diversity of life on the planet and is based on all the evidence. evolution does include several laws which is explains, such as the law of natural selection.
AussiePolitics 1 month ago
@NamelessMIAyt actually the difference between a law and a theory is that a law is an observed phenomenon while a theory is an explanation of why it occurs. for instance, there is the law of gravity, and there is the theory of gravity. the law of gravity, in basically what goes up, attraction etc etc. the theory of gravity explains why this thing happens.
AussiePolitics 1 month ago
@TomFynn Another example is String Theory. It is unfalsifiable, yet it has been warmly accepted into the scientific community. It can not be proved nor disproved, but the scientific community holds on to it because it fits their observations. (Does that sound familiar to you? A bit like religion, maybe? Think about it for a second.)
allamericandude15 1 month ago
@allamericandude15 String theory is based on sound mathematical procedure and each step can be retraced by *anyone*. Allowing for intellect and education. Furthermore string theory is developed to not only fit the known facts about particles, but fit them based on as few assumptions as possible *but not fewer*. That's good science. Whether it matches the physics remains to be seen.
No. String theory is *anything* but religion.
TomFynn 1 month ago
fuckin hell..confidence and a half
scruffylittledog 1 month ago
Even if God was real which is probably the most doubtful thing in the universe, I think Jimmy Carr would have a better chance of getting into heaven than some of the leeches in the comments because he makes people laugh. And if God really is omniscient and can do everything, I'm sure he can manage a sense of humor.
jerichoduke 1 month ago
August 4th 2010: Que Epic War Music, we got a very pissed off argument in the comments.
ARomanianKid14 1 month ago
Just throwing in my two pence, when it comes to life I'm an Atheist, Darwinism, Pro-Choice, Science and all that shizz. When it comes to death, I guess we would say Agnostic, because, lets be honest, no-one really knows what happens when we die. Whether we cease to exist or go to an afterlife or are reincarnated.
TheLuckiestClover 1 month ago
@TheLuckiestClover :) you need to sort your shit, you can't be both. what you just described is agnostic, i think. but if you're so into science how can you still believe that reincarnation is possible? how would you explain the consciousness of someone who's just died going into the fetus in a woman's womb? and then when it grows up, he/she can't remember anything from the previous life anyway? how is that not wishful thinking because you're afraid of death and choose to pretend it's not real?
dotchoo 1 month ago
@dotchoo
Atheist and agnostic are not mutualy exclusive.
Reincarnation may be a bit of a stretch, but hey, once the neuroscience gets far enough, maybe we'll make our own artificial reincarnation.
TheCraziestFox 1 month ago
@MuhammedKhan9 Atheists scum? Last I checked Atheists didn't kill thousands of blacks, women, gays, and anyone different just because their big white human male imaginary friend in the sky told them "SLAVE, WITCH, HERETIC!"
Plus heaven and hell are so backwards, if being gay is against gods will, then why does he live in a cloud kingdom with pearly gates and a rainbow throne?
Christianity is full of contradictions, and denying it proves a lack of a 9th grade education.
Ultrox007 1 month ago 53
@Ultrox007 the cloud kingdom and the pearly gates and the rainbow throne are an integral part of your argument? Besides have you heard of Stalin, Pol Pot and Mau?
BlueShadowIaido 1 month ago
@BlueShadowIaido no ,they're not a serious part of my arguement, it's just a funny low blow I have for the anti-gay christians that are out there. Yes I have heard of Stalin, and Mau (Pol Pot not so much sadly) and I agree on their outlooks of religion needing to be removed, I however do NOT agree with their practices of doing so. Also I could easily turn the religious tables around, after all, how many still talk about stalin as opposed to hitler or 9/11.?
Ultrox007 1 month ago
@Ultrox007 You see there I generalised atheists, like you generalised non-atheists. Double standards is quite an annoying thing right? I'm also finding it difficult discerning attempts at being witty and actual ignorance in your posts, but you do realise the connection between the superior Aryan ideology and evolution right? Concerning 9/11 you're putting all religions/faiths in one pot and blaming them all.
BlueShadowIaido 1 month ago
@BlueShadowIaido Idk, because I didn't really take offense like at all to it, I know there's some people that are just crappy people and I accept that, what I don't like is when those people create a whole teaching of being crappy bigots. And it wasn't really trying to be witty or being ignorant, it was trying to rush out a thought while in a library. and considering the 9/11 joke, it's more getting to the point that "not just christians" (however 9/11 is a whole other story.)
Ultrox007 1 month ago
@BlueShadowIaido Also, there's multiple people that commented on this, mine was just (apparently) the most popular response. I'm all up for debate and such, but debating religion is like arguing with a brick wall nothing new will come to light and neither will budge from their spot until one of the two walks away and leaves it alone (note: either can be the wall)
I just wanted to make a point at the person who was being a dick about their religion and acting so typical about it
Ultrox007 1 month ago
@Ultrox007 arguing on youtube is totally pointless. I was just looking for some classic religion-athiest banter.
BlueShadowIaido 1 month ago
@BlueShadowIaido Good point haha, no hard feelings -shakes hand- now then BACK TO PLAYING LoL! *twitches*
Ultrox007 1 month ago
@Ultrox007 Trying to talk reason with a religious person is like playing chess with a pigeon. It doesn't matter how much you care about the game and no matter how much you play by the rules, the pigeon will just knock over all the pieces, shit all over the board and strut around like it won.
PeculiarAxolotl 1 month ago 77
@PeculiarAxolotl That is by far one of the most win responses I have ever seen, -thumbs up-.
Ultrox007 1 month ago
@PeculiarAxolotl well said
mrnoodleisdead 2 weeks ago
@PeculiarAxolotl I cannot reiterate this enough when religious people come to me and complain about how I don't believe in god, either leave me alone or be prepared to lose the argument.
ThunderSpartan117 2 weeks ago
@ThunderSpartan117 Maybe your problem is that you know religious people that complain about you not believing in God? I don't like Salt Lake City either.
Raventoll 2 weeks ago
so what r u cathloc, budda, hindu, or what?
SuperPreston18 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
so what r u cathloc, budda, hindu, or what?
SuperPreston18 2 days ago
@BlueShadowIaido My final note (I hate the character limit on youtube) your "Mau" and "Stalin" examples (just for a second) their people feared and somewhat hated them (if I'm correct) while the religious leaders were more like the nazis (blindly following a horrible regime in belief that they were a master race) my main thought regarding that is the witch trials and crusade... and all of the dark ages...
I'm not TRYING to be a dick about it, I'm just negative about everything
Ultrox007 1 month ago
@Ultrox007 Thumbed down ofc
crushni 3 weeks ago
Ok here is my thing with any belief including being an athiest. My little cousin said God Bless you to an Athiest and he continued to yell at her and tell her she was a moron for believing in god. Of course the same thing can go for religious people. I just hate it when people are almost angry with their belief. Like "hey I don't belive in god" "YOU WILL BE CONDEMED TO THE DEPTHS OF HELL FOR YOU ILL MINDED SOUL!!!!!" seriously chill out. Let people make their own decisions.
ChinchillasForever 1 month ago
@ChinchillasForever hear hear!
DrShovelhands 1 month ago
I dislike Atheists and Theists. Atheists bash on Theists for believing in God via faith. Yet the hypocrisy in that statement is that science and everything we know is based on faith (NOTHING can be 100% True). Atheism is actually based on faith! I know, how ironic! You can not prove that something is not there but you can assume it's not. Sounds familiar to faith right? So anyone here who says one or another is wrong should actually educate themselves.
sbaeagles15 1 month ago
@sbaeagles15 Atheist do not assume the something isnt true, we reject the assumptions of others until there is further proof. There is no assumption, but a lack thereof. Also, Empirical proofs, like Ohms law, are 100% true. The gravitational constant. Polarity of water.
IamBotel 1 month ago
@sbaeagles15 (1) Claiming that it takes faith, to not believe something that has no evidence, is backwards. (2) Facts do not require faith. If I drop something, it will fall at 9.8 m/s2 - a testable, verifiable, repeatable scientific fact. When science is not certain, it says so. Otherwise, it's pseudoscience that requires faith.
TheHigherVoltage 1 month ago
@sbaeagles15 Get your postmodernist bullshit out of here.
TheFartoholic 1 month ago
Just read a few comments on this thread and I'm ashamed to be a human being. I'm an atheist yet have never thrown my beliefs down anyone's throats unlike our religious friends, but people can't see the real reason we have wars across the world. Does Mr America,UK, Ethiopia etc have the right to claim the larger knowledge of how someone else feels and what they believe in? Few questions I ask all of you.... do you not breathe the same air and piss in the same water? Does your shit not smell?
AdySilverback1 1 month ago
Well since everyone is shouting opinions I guess I'll have a go. There's nothing at all wrong with "having faith" in something. The problem is that things like the Bible aren't being presented as "something to have faith in". They are being presented as absolute fact. Think whatever you like. Have faith in whatever. But when you say something is a fact you better be ready to back it up with some kind of evidence.
ahhhhjjjj 2 months ago
Worst jokes
MrTurfed 2 months ago
Haha jesus was a fag my day is complete
toastedmuslim 2 months ago
It is really funny reading all these comments arguing bout religion
I would love if 1 person was able to tell me 3 good things that religion has done in the world
Bad things: A lot of wars have been bout religion Priest are pedoes Discrimination(anti-semetic) many more things
666THEHOLYNUMBER 2 months ago
There is more proof for the Loch Ness monster existing than any god. lol.
TheJDorian 2 months ago
@TheJDorian Just to play devil's advocate here for fun: I'd say they're about equal. Loch Ness: photos of a lake with an object in the water that people say is a creature. God: burnt toast that people say has the face of Jesus in it. There. Bet you didn't expect a comment like that XD
ahhhhjjjj 2 months ago
If it was up to me, all you people that believe in this shit would be committed. You are detremental to progress.
jyarsch 2 months ago
@Hayles46: The reason is that most people are too much of children to respect opinions and understand where to draw a line. Nothing is wrong with faith unless people use it as a source of power (or any other form of harmful reasoning). If faith makes someone happy, and they live out logical, philosophical lives then so be it. However, for some reason, most people seem to see some bad apples of religion or atheism; and then completely judge all others based on that bad example. Childish really.
flybyproxy 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
beware of youtube user Megazordman2 who posts insluting comments on christianity on videos. Please go to his channel youtube dot com slash megazordman2 and report him 20-30 times a day until he is perma banned. Stop letting these kids get away with it.
RethinkingAmerica 2 months ago
what's catholicism?
brockheinz 2 months ago
@brockheinz wow.
tzsitfhio 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@tzsitfhio lol I knew I'd get a comment like that. By the way its catholicism. There is no such thing as catholicism, that's like saying jewism. My comment was sarcastic.
brockheinz 2 months ago
@brockheinz Google it.
Historian66669 2 months ago
@Historian66669 lol I knew I'd get a comment like that. By the way its catholicism. There is no such thing as catholicism, that's like saying jewism. My comment was sarcastic.
brockheinz 2 months ago
what the hell? I'm religious, but i actually have a sense of humour, unlike some obviously, so i found Jimmy funny as per :)
stacey2evaa 2 months ago
Jesus Christ you look amazing!
WhiteRavenStar 2 months ago
Haha King of the Pedos.
InsideCellardoor 2 months ago
damn communists
kleuter15 3 months ago
atheist and antitheist and tooth fairy-agnostic all express pretty much the same feeling
Lan5in6 3 months ago
I dont really like arguing about this but cmon. A god? I bet the people who wrote it were drunk and thought "I got an idea! Lets write a story about a man who created us and lets see if people will belive in it" and the others were probably like "this is gonna to be the greatest prank of all time". If you belive in god then you should also belive in unicorns since they exist in books. There hasnt been and never will be any proof of a god existing. Evolution theory has some explanations at least.
Kr3PPs 3 months ago
Love how everyone is arguing about religion and atheism here...I think it's nice if you believe in a religion as it's nice to believe in something, even though I don't believe in religion, even though it can bring good and bad to others.
I'm not atheist because I don't care if god exists or not. If I die and there is a god and an afterlife I'm in for a nice surprise and if not, well I'm dead aren't I? :)
PS this video is awesome by the way! :D
rockhorsegeek 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You are delusional for believing in imaginary friends :)..........Now that's funny
Templemain 3 months ago
I like trains ._.
FlopsyDiggins 3 months ago
Soooo funny!! I agree with him altogether lmao
joeymac11 3 months ago
@hempartist420 before the war, every home had a radio and cars were becomming more readily accessible to all people and their ecconomy was booming. So for the most part,, Germany was one of the best economies in the world at that time
Ems15196 3 months ago
What makes this video so hilarious was he didn't need to change his voice to do gay impressions. The reason for all of that is well...he's English.
chevleclair 3 months ago
priests cant marry. nevermind marry other gay priests! i think he means vicars maybe?
moekanz 3 months ago
Every religious person debating here I bet is American.
Kaaxe 3 months ago
I love this guy. one of the best out there.
Daydream2142 3 months ago
To put this short. Faith means to believe in something without the proof of existence. Basically you are delusional for believing in imaginary friends :)
Absuleet 3 months ago 110
@Absuleet Sooo basically you're being a douche trying to call out people who believe in god, instead of being the bigger person and going about your business
sakiLOVER 3 months ago
@sakiLOVER I am sorry if it got through your thick skull that way but I was just stating the truth.
Absuleet 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Absuleet See, no you didn't if you would have said "To put this short. Faith means to believe in something without the proof of existence." That's stating the truth, and only the truth. By adding "Basically you are delusional for believing in imaginary friends :)" you're being a douche
sakiLOVER 3 months ago
@Absuleet It's not like you can prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that God doesn't exist either, the rational choice is to believe that God exists. If you don't believe and God does exists, you're screwed. If you believe and it turns out there is no God, well what have you got to lose? It's the rational bet.
Carefreeblues 3 months ago
@Carefreeblues The possibilities of some invisible guy who can heal and make miracles happen is not likely. It has been proven that evolution is the reason behind everything. :)
Absuleet 3 months ago
Comment removed
liverpoolmatt87 2 months ago
@Carefreeblues I'd say that you're brainwashed....well & truly.
liverpoolmatt87 2 months ago
@liverpoolmatt87 Unless you actually want to have an argument, I'd say that YOU are in fact brainwashed and arrogant to the point that you can't actually consider the possibility of a being that is greater than yourself.
Carefreeblues 2 months ago
@Carefreeblues There is a possibility, of course. Just like we are "greater" than dogs there could be being greater than us. But the proof for their existence?
PktMma 2 months ago
@Carefreeblues hmm there is something on what you say...... that makes you sound like a total retard..... probably all you have written....
xCryptorx 2 months ago
@Carefreeblues im curious; how would you be screwed :)
Damien
CheeseburgerLPs 2 months ago
@Absuleet True story bro ;D thats exactly the way it is :)
JonesBoii995 3 months ago
@Absuleet yh m8 ur rly smart, tht is hw it iz. gud job m8, u r genius!!! :D
r9elite 2 months ago
@r9elite Thanks bro :D
Absuleet 2 months ago
@Absuleet faith is merely believing something "can be"
every man has faith on something, otherwise he wouldnt have hope, those kind of people are the ones who want to end their lives.
im not talking about religion i was merely debating what you think faith is and its delusional to believe in what y think is right.
missionpupa 2 months ago
@missionpupa I only believe in things that I have seen. So your every man has faith story has been busted.
Absuleet 2 months ago
@Absuleet your an idiot, you completely missed what i was saying.
ok ill speak in simple and plain words this time.
do you believe youll be happy in the future? do you think youll find the person you love before you die? what makes you think tomorrow is not the day that you die?
see if you had completely no faith in these at all. you will never wake up in the morning with a smile on your face. the thing is, you find "faith" synonymous to "religion"
i hope you can wrap your head around this.
missionpupa 2 months ago
@missionpupa A: Idc if I am happy in the future. B: Idc if I find the person I love before I die. C: Idc if I die tomorrow. All the crap you speak of is for paranoid people. I just live life and let it take me wherever it goes. GF :)
Absuleet 2 months ago
@Absuleet ok you are officially a moron, what i was talking about is a fact. im not gonna waste my time explaining to someone with a narrow point of view in that little head of yours because you will never get it. feel annoyed and sorry for you at the same time. ciao
missionpupa 2 months ago
@missionpupa Well aren't you quick to judge :P
Absuleet 2 months ago
@Absuleet
if god's not real how did jesus walk on water?
Christians-1 Atheists-0
Adv3z 1 month ago
@Adv3z Got proof of that?
Christians - 0 Atheists - 1
Absuleet 1 month ago 40
@Absuleet it says it in the bible
Christians-1 Atheists-0
Adv3z 1 month ago
@Adv3z You mean the bible which is supposed to be older than you and you cannot prove that anything in the bible is true and not to mention that the bible has been rewritten.
Christians never win, Atheists always win :)
Absuleet 1 month ago
@Absuleet xD i know right, btw i am actually atheist, i guess considering how stupid some christians are my joking arguments don't seem to far-fetched xD
Adv3z 1 month ago
@Adv3z Lol, I just thought you were some crazy Christian trying to rely on words from a book as evidence.
Absuleet 1 month ago
@Absuleet The scores are a little bigger than that, but yes that sums it up pretty nicely :)
Atheists - Make sense
theists - Not so much
XplosivCookie 1 month ago
@Adv3z wheres your fucking evidence jesus walked on water, you going to tell me aswell about how jack and the beanstalk is real aswell ?
youngfeniansofeire 1 month ago
@youngfeniansofeire please refer to my other previous comment where i told the person i originally replyed to how i was joking and am actually an atheist
in fact i just recently finished reading the god delusion
but one piece of bullshit i will not stand for
jack and the beanstalk IS TOO FUCKING REAL!
Adv3z 1 month ago
@Adv3z aha no problem
youngfeniansofeire 1 month ago
@lotmein20
Many argue that a world without religion would no longer impede progress. All I can say to that is look at Stalin's "progress", and that is what you could very well have (again) if religions were gone. And to Iuf4rall there just doesn't so "happen" to be Catholic charities, charity is one of the principal teachings of Catholicism.
AFMader 3 months ago
@AFMader Stalin made Russia one of the forefronts in the time by his methods. I am not justifying them but he did make progress in the country as did Hitler. ANYONE who says different is biased against the TRUTH by governments who would willinng start a war just because Daddy felt insulted
Ems15196 3 months ago
@lotmein20
Both Stalin and Lenin believed that, to create a perfect and just society, one must do away with religion (sound familiar atheists?). My point is that under an atheist ruler, millions of people had suffered and died with Stalin caring not the slightest for their plight, rather, working them to death. Under both Stalin and Hitler religious people were persecuted against because they slowed progress (at least in their eyes).
AFMader 3 months ago
@lotmein20
I find it so sad that you would implicate God for encouraging Hitler to start the Holocaust, while at the same time covering Stalin's tracks by saying he was motivated by politics and not by belief. That's because he had no beliefs. To Stalin, there was no God and therefore no authority superior to his own which could punish him with eternal damnation for his many years of brutal rule.
AFMader 3 months ago