Re:To DarrylSloan,Telekinesis Skeptics,and Their Bullshit.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr Sorry, but I refused to go into that dogma channel simply because they hold an opinion or a faith so seriously that they'll accepted as a fact. They had fallen to what they called, "Confirmation bias", where subjects no longer pay attention to anything other than what they have already decided is important. The problem with it is that this type of people quickly criticize you based on their opinions, but the good thing is that it proves they're ignorant.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,I know what you mean.I don't like the JREF fans so much;considering people don't believe in Psi because there is no evidence for it (which there is),and they believe Randi,but he offers NO evidence for debunking Psi and for his image and other things.We live in a world where everything is finite and stone;skeptics fear change.Well,I will be sticking around the JREF's YouTube channel for a while;then forget about him and the skeptics.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr I don't understand what Randi's gibberish magic has anything to do with parapsychology. Parapsychologist use physical targets, such as a dice, random number generator, hidden images and Zener Cards. Their experiments are under controlled, meta-analysis, double-blind experiment, follow scientific methodology, etc. If you really pay close attention to Parapsychology, you would see that their reasearch, experiments, and studies have nothing to do with Randi's workings.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss I mean,I enjoy what Randi does and how he debunks the fakes;like Browne,Edwards,etc.I know he might be a pain sometimes;but he is giving us an advantage of the fake psychics and the real ones.We should see the reference he is giving us;so we don't spend our money on the fake psychics.But,Randi is a fraud;just an advantage to the truth-seekers from the liars.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr Yes, I do appreciate Randi debunking the frauds and showing to the people to see how much bullshit there are in the paranormal, however, the challenge and thinking he has the right to speak in the scientific community is simply foolish. Randi believes that the paranormal is just magic tricks because that's his reality. His beliefs in the paranormal as magic tricks are actually based on his opinions. Opinions and faith is no evidence and it is inconsistent in Science.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,me too.Randi is a fraud,no one in the right mind of the media will win,but like I said;he is giving us an advantage of the frauds,and the truth tellers.Yes,his regards aren't scientific,there false claims.He knows nothing about the paranormal;nor Magick,supernatural,etc.

Yes,his opinions are based on nothing paranormal;but Pseudo scientific.We are constantly learning new things everyday;your're right,science doesn't have any answers.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr Reality is the way you preceive it and interpret it, not the way it is. For instance, if I had never seen a ghost in my life, then my reality is that ghost don't exist, but in vice versa, they do exist. Randi has spent all his time in magic tricks and art of deception. So, chances are, his reality is that paranormal are just magic tricks and self-deception. That's his reality and that's how he interpret it. This is called, "Confirmation Bias" Look it up.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Also,I will show you on a message how everyone at the JREF;including Penn Jillette from "Penn & Teller:Bullshit",Penn Jillette isn't a full time member of them;but is a big group for them at times.As well as Derren Brown from "Science of Scams" who is widely connected with the JREF is a fraud.On "Science of Scams" he doesn't make sense to anything he says (i.e. his debunks).

Most of the skeptics to Psi are frauds;like I said,it is a reference from the real to the fakes.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr We need more critical thinking people, like me, to debunk the bullshit coming out of pseudo-skeptics and frauds, the invalid criticism toward people's belief or opinion, and showing what's Science and What is pseudo-science. Critical thinking is the key to debunk bullshit because it is a double edge sword and we need to expand it widely to stop this invalid criticism nonsense!

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,we need a lot of critical thinkers (not the skeptics).Yes,to debunk the skeptics and frauds.Just watch Penn & Teller:Bullshit!

[angelsssssssssssss]

MittensMr You should ignore religious nuts because it's obvious that they hold an opinion or belief so seriously that they'll take it as a fact without even looking up the facts. This type of people are poor-epistemic agents and they'll attack if you go against it. I had proven that JR challenge isn't scientific, and contains statistical errors. Hence, there's no reason that the challenge disproves psi.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,I do ignore the religious nuts and so on.They're the ones missing out.I used to be a Christian and a Wiccan-we can discuss that another time.Randi's challenge isn't scientific,it's Pseudo scientific.

What dumbfucks!

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr The realible positive evidence that would convince scientists to take psi phenomena seriously does not lie on the person claiming psi, but lies in emperical studies or research. Evidence of a person possesing psi isn't realible enough to convince scientists. However, evidence from experimental series, which the hypothesis are independently replicated, positive, statistically significant and well-controlled, is scientific and realible enough to convince scientist.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,it's more about the evidence,then the demonstration.For example,Nina Kulagina,she did real TK under strict and controlled conditions by real scientists and shitless Randi had to try and debunk her with the "string on collar" debunk.His debunk was nonsense and fake.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Hey,there are some problems on Randi's channel;with me and a few people and I need your help.I'm being called a fraud;and such!

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Tell me when you get to his channel;let the war begin!

[angelsssssssssssss]

Hey, I received your message from Yahoo mail, but I'm not gonna be able to reply till Friday because I'm currently on a mobile and I can't use the computer mon-thurs.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Hey.Yahoo!Mail?Oh,anyways,alri­ght!

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr Many years ago, if you tried to explain or demonstrate to someone what a black hole is, people, including scientists, would call you crazy and say it defies the laws of Physics. Well, physicist are already accepting the fact that black holes, and time travel exist. So, as you could see, Science has its own limit in knowledge. We do not completely understand the universe. We need to discover and study alien biology, discover new things and unusual phenomenas.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,they would call you crazy-and say it defies Newtons laws of Motion-as well as Christians,they would say "Since it isn't in the Bible,it's a lie from Satan".They believe what is know,and not whats not known.

[MittensMr]

@MittensMr Scientist's already around the globe are saying Time-Travel and Black-Holes,and even Psi is real.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr That is so true! Pseudo-Skeptics are like religious people. Trying to convince them by logic reasoning is nearly impossible. It's like trying to convince Christians that god doesn't exist. The JREF attracts to much religious nuts because the JREF is more like a dogmatic or faith system, instead of Science. I Would suggest you to ignore them and if they got a problem, they could address me.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,they're both the same,even with their own kind of logical explanation.Yes,if you say their God is fake,the would gather around and pray over you,lol.

JREF attracts religious nut's and fraudulent Psychic nut's like Browne and Edwards,etc.

Who should I ignore the skeptics or religious nuts?

[angelsssssssssssss]

Skeptics are people who don't accept something that is inconclusive. They don't believe untill they see realible evidence. This type of skepticism is healthy and deserves to be treated in controversial cases. However, skeptics had seen scientific emperical evidence of psi and they agree something going on. Why hell, I'm a statistican and I had seen scientific emperical evidence of the mind influencing chance. I tried to explained it as luck or type I bias, but the odds are against it.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,they only accept VALID explanations out of scientific data journals;only that.I guess we live in a world where science rules:(Man,I should of known Psi was fake all along(satire)!

Yes,even when they see the evidence,they still will deny it.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Also,it is good to have healthy skepticism,as well as good beliefs,too!

Yes,they sometimes accept valid explanations and/or hardcore scientific evidence-I see it as how they were raised.

[angelsssssssssssss]

@MittensMr I agree with you! Pseudo-Skeptics would quickly dismiss a case just by throwing their explanations that haven't even been tested. They claim they're open minded, but as a critical thinker, they're close minded. Criticizing someone's belief or claim by prejudice, saying it doesn't exist, and telling people to prove it is no where near open minded. This type of act is a disgrace and it's not even genuine skepticism.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,the same with religious people;they're just like skeptics.Saying one thing is valid,while say one isn't.It makes no sense.

What is your opinion on Telekinesis defying the laws of Physics?I say bullshit!

[angelsssssssssssss]

In logic, if one criticize someone's belief or claim that has been justified by priori or posteriori means, then that one is doing a stupid move, which that one are people who talk trash to Darry. If you wanna learn how to use my logic, feel free to contact me. With my logic, you could debunk pseudo-skeptical fallacies, have the sense to know what to believe and what not to believe, disprove a statement using deductive reasoning, and of course, critical thinking.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Yes,correct!Yes,the skeptics decide to make a "skeptical" move,if you could say that,and their logic has NO backup what-so-ever.Darryl knows what he is doing,and if the Pseudo Skeptics don't like it;then they need to get the fuck out and read some books on classical Physics and see how much sense TK makes in Physics.

Yes,I could take some of your advice!;)I hope your teaching's of life,could help me within proving these idiotic skeptics!

[angelsssssssssssss]

Pseudo-Skeptics, since you're claiming that Darry's experiments of psi wheel is fake, then why don't you conduct many experiments that are exactly as darrylsloan experiments? If you find it valid, then Darry is valid. Don't give me that bullshit of that burden of proof because it's just an excuse to defend your claims. If A makes a claim, and B cast doubt, A's next move is to provide justification. It's simple logic. Darrly has justified his claim,sadly, you PS have no back up evidence.

[MittensMr]

@angelsssssssssssss Well said!Pseudo Skeptics;think what they wan't,when they wan't how they wan't.Yes,Darryl has proven how Pseudo scientific the "heat theory" on moving the Psi Wheel excuse is complete bullshit!I can show in about one-hundred different ways;that Darryl isn't using an known or true scientific principles on the Psi Wheel.

There was a documentary on some skeptics proving Psi exist without even knowing it.

See what happens when you explore the world and have a open mind?;)

[drewschkelton]

honestly mittenMr we dont need anymore videos showing how someone is not a fraud... its real and those that wish to ignore it can.. it really doesn't matter.. universities take telekinesis seriously and there have been several experiments and papers done on it to prove that it is real.

what we need now is real world applications of it and more advanced manipulation.

[MittensMr]

@drewschkelton Yes,true!Thanks anyways,but I just try to to do to things is prove skeptics wrong and be a pain in the ass to the skeptics:P Yes,it has been documented world wide,between the Rhine Institute,KGB,C.I.A.,P.E.A.R. Institute,Dean Radin and more universities and scientists.But,no skeptics have to be right (sarcasm)!

[NoMoreC2]

It took me 20 minutes to work out a convincing way to show "Telekinesis" under glass on a laminate surface.DarrylSloan is a fraud and not a good one at that.

[MittensMr]

@NoMoreC2 Hey,although you may have done testing on Telekinesis.Although I can't give any good reasons on how Darryl is a fraud.Can you give me three reasons on how he is a fraud?

[NoMoreC2]

This guys a pro w86hDdUD03o&feature=related but just take a look at all the comments on mattmans videos.Do they simply ignore the text in the description? 1. He asked if i could replicate the same in a video,which i did.2.I added another five and asked which 2 where faked and 3. his excuse to why he wouldn't preform the same experiment under the watchful eye of a sceptic.

[MittensMr]

@NoMoreC2 OK.But how does he make the Psi Wheel move?Can I have an explanation for that?...I don't believe he is a fraud,but we are all entitled to our own opinions.

[NoMoreC2]

@MittensMr This "experiment" can only be performed by using a light paper or aluminium foil wheel.My question is why? Does the mind only have the ability to move the lightest possible materials that are also vulnerable to outside influences?