to pilkingtonphil, then can you say how it is closer to philosophy? no you aint able, 'cause it is the hypothesis which comes first, then it will be proved or rejected.
One reason people study "linguistics" is to find out how they actually function in conditioning social structures and individual behavior. 'Proof' here does have a possible functional and testable meaning just as in the so called 'natural sciences'.
What a stupid fucking comparison. Linguistics is not a science like chemistry - its closer to philosophy, so no theory will be eventually "proved", they're just different perspectives...
good job jackass, you clearly don't understand the concept of materialism. its not a matter of perspectives or sciences, they're processes in constant flux
to pilkingtonphil, then can you say how it is closer to philosophy? no you aint able, 'cause it is the hypothesis which comes first, then it will be proved or rejected.
roshan9171 1 year ago
One reason people study "linguistics" is to find out how they actually function in conditioning social structures and individual behavior. 'Proof' here does have a possible functional and testable meaning just as in the so called 'natural sciences'.
ThewildRageofGordon 1 year ago
What a stupid fucking comparison. Linguistics is not a science like chemistry - its closer to philosophy, so no theory will be eventually "proved", they're just different perspectives...
pilkingtonphil 2 years ago
@pilkingtonphil
good job jackass, you clearly don't understand the concept of materialism. its not a matter of perspectives or sciences, they're processes in constant flux
lafter8 1 year ago