Go to "check the evidence.com" and listen to the recent interview that andrew johnson did with tina foster. and listen to the 2007 gmtv interview with heather mills. and remember that you have been seeing and hearing faul for years so it's hard for your mind to break through the dissonance. at the end of the day if you want to start another money making war in a place like vietnam, you can't have bands going round spreading love and peace.
The uploader of this video.......you are wrong Paul was not driving to Ringo Starrs house when he was supposely killed in a car crash.....Paul was said to have stormed out of a recording session with the Beatles and then got in his car and then crashed while driving. The truth is it never happened Paul was not killed in a car crash and he was not replaced.
I think people are taking this Paul Mccartney death thing too far...I believe Paul Mccartney has been harrassed about him being fake and not the real Paul Mccartney with people demanding he take a DNA test. I disagree with people harrassing him just because of some death rumour from 40 odd years ago. Its disgusting that people force their opinions on him in public because of what they`ve seen on the internet when they haven`t any proof that he is a replacement..to harrass him in public is not on
@MrIhateconnie Back in the 70s his voice pattern/sound wave thingy was analysed (as good as the technology of the day could do) and left no doubt that Paul was Paul.
Very interesting video - enjoyed it but I am left with the distinct impression that the McCartney of recent times is the same as the one from the Cavern simply because of the way he speaks. Of course that is not to say it couldn't be mimicked. I have noticed that faces do change remarkably over the years but not usually in a matter of months. You only have to look at the change in Keith Richard over the years to see how very much a face can alter. But you have got me thinking...hmm?
Perhaps he had plastic surgery in 1966, everyone was saying it wasn't him, so he changed it back. Also mabye they put those "Paul is dead" "hints" in things were to spark people's imaginations as a joke. Think Beatles people.
I just cannot imagine how a person could be so gullible to believe this rubbish.
Why on earth would they do this? If they did it and decided to keep silent about it forever why release these so called "clues?" Why did not one of his friends or family ever question that this is the real Paul McCartney just the usual conspiracy nut jobs.
Honestly it is just stupid beyond words. And has no basis in reality.
Most stupid thing I ever saw, how can you really believe that. Same thing people said about Elvis Presley, that he still alive.... ppfffffff so funny!!!
The Beatles were a tavistock creation, so its more than likely that they also created this conspiracy as a little social experiment...just to fuck with your minds and have you running in circles. Enjoy it
I agree that the current Paul McCartney is not the same person. Faul is taller, his head is longer and narrower, he has green eyes, and his speaking and singing voice is lower pitched. Good job girl, you added to convincing me!
so lets sum it up, someboy insisted on a double for a band that had well known internal fights afterwards and fell apart in a couple of years. the double had a plastic surgery to change the nose and chin back in 67 to look like "Paul" and then another one some time later so that he could look nothing like Paul again?
oh Jesus is it so hard to understand that no one can have the same talent that Paul McCartney has? there is no possibility for someone to have the same fucking good talent.....
@despedazador123 DUDE, HOW R U SO SURE IT'S THE SAME TALENT? IF IT'S AN IMPOSTER, HE'S OBVIOULSY AN ARTIST TOO, TEHY R NOT GONNA REPLACE HIM WITH A SHOEMAKER. COULDN'T IT BE THAT THIS GUY MADE A LIVING OUT OF FAKING BEING SOMEONE ELSE, AND KEEPING IT ON SECREDCY ALONG WITH THOSE INVOLVED IN THIS SHAM?
You're daft. Lennon lost his baby fat & looked really different too. It was the drugs/lifestyle. And someone wearing a similar shirt means that is Paul sitting there? Get a clue. The guy looks more like Lennon to me!
you should have pointed out that the cover always says "here lies Paul" (the drum [here] the end of the Beatles logo including the trophy [lies] and the flowers [Paul])
What a wste of time putting this up together.People's face change overtime with age especially.So whats the problem with the changing looks of Paul Mcca?!LOL this is some funny shit! =D
@rynowens i happen to love the beatles, watched every documentary on the band, play their music,and seen paul mccartney live last year..he didnt die..i cant believe you would be ignorant enough to believe this whole charade and then tell me to do research bro.
@grubenhiemer okay dude ur brain washed like the gov wants, john lennon and george harrison werent crazy, why would they give clues in every song they ever made after that wednesday morning in 1966?? paul mccartney died
Dont your eyes change colour over time? i mean mine used to be green but now their blue, over a considerable number of years ofcourse not like over night, and ofcourse unknown conditions etc etc, this is paul, all you conspiracy lovers let it go....and even if it was an "imposter" listen to him, bloody amazing lol
I have to say that the two Pauls do actually look a little different, but I certanly don't believe Paul McCartney died in a car accident in 1966 and that they replaced him with an identical twin that looks and sounds just like him and can play exactly the same instuments Paul played with the same skill. Nice choice of music though.
Oh, I know! There were 3 Pauls..triplets! And seriously, it's not that the nose and ears continue to grow, but the rest of the face actually shrinks and/or sags, as grubenhiemer says, it's AGING! This hoax was all said in done and ended in 1968, but 'we' are obsessed with mysterious 'what ifs'. And now the younger generation thinks they've stumbled upon this conspiratory revelation. Guess what.. Its over, been over since 1968. If you still believe Paul is dead, the jokes still on you.
How can you be so sure? I mean the three Paul's thing is just ridiculous. one of those men are Lennon, and I can't quite tell you who the other was, but the rumour that Paul is dead wasn't released into the public until 1969. If you watch The documentary of George Harrison's final Testament you will find yourself question your very own beliefs. I completely disagreed with everybody when they said Paul was dead, but now I have myself guessing as well.
@fullhair47 Oh I guess I got the year wrong. It was a long time ago, seems like it was 68 to me. How amazing they could find such an exact look alike, sound alike with the same writing ability, etc., etc. You will believe what you choose to believe.
I recently watched a documentary titled "Paul McCartney Really is Dead", so many of the so called facts just don't add up. For one thing to find a look alike is one thing but to find a perfect vocal match is another, I love early Beatles as much as the later but if Paul was replaced by Faul then what and incredible talent "Faul" was!!!, All the later Beatles songs as well as all the songs he did with Wings, If that was Faul then he was every bit as talented as the real Paul ever was or could be.
As an artist; I can tell you that facial features may appear different due to lighting conditions; how the shadows are cast, also the images are at a slightly different angle. Not to mention; everyone ages; it's a part of life...If it's not really Paul, the fake Paul has been around longer than the real one and wrote countless hits such as Let it be, Another day, sing the changes...as well as memory almost full. What next, are you going to say John and George are alive?
It is weird, as his chin is wider in that first 1967 picture... BUT... whoever he is today, i rate him, cos the beatles music got better after 1966, PLUS, from wings alone, "maybe i'm amazed", which is the greatest love ballard of all fuckin time, AND... he stayed with his first wife for over 3 decades, till death did they part... total fuckin respect to him whoever he is... Paul or Faul.... um cheh, um check it, um check it owt. but i do like a good conspiracy, so keep up the good work guys A+
Paul McCartney has a one in a kind face! Nobody could ever look that much like him! Also if you watch him in really old interviews and previous interviews, he sounds exactly the same and his head bobs the same way and his lips move the same way and everything he says and does is the same! If you believe this bullshit there is something wrong with your brain!
it's called weight loss and weight gain, and stress. it's not like the touring and the drugs could have been the best for him so you get long faced paul. Not touring no stress eating better the dude put on a bit of weight. and as far as the eye color goes cameras sucked ass back then you never really knew what you might get. So the person who thinks it's a conspiricy, I think you are kind of a moron. Just my opinion.
it's called weight loss and weight gain, and stress. it's not like the touring and the drugs could have been the best for him so you get long faced paul. Not touring no stress eating better the dude put on a bit of weight. and as far as the eye color goes cameras sucked ass back then you never really knew what you might get. So the person who thinks it's a conspiricy, I think you are kind of a moron. Just my opinion.
it's called weight loss and weight gain, and stress. it's not like the touring and the drugs could have been the best for him so you get long faced paul. Not touring no stress eating better the dude put on a bit of weight. and as far as the eye color goes cameras sucked ass back then you never really knew what you might get. So the person who thinks it's a conspiricy, I think you are kind of a moron. Just my opinion.
How do we know If it's....PID...or, did he just have "Plastic surgery in 67." Oh, yeah--there is that problem with the color of his eyes--is it Hazel or Brown? Or, Green....? Then there is his strange ear problems---ok,ok,.....PID!
People change as they age and you can clearly see throughout the video how similar his face is. The eyes look exactly the same shape. What lunatics believe this crap? Scary people..
I thought this rumor was crushed in the 60s.. how can you really believe this? C'mon Youtube, people get older, and they age. No disrespect, but I'm sure that no baby boomer looks entirely like their former self, the days of cut-off's and tube tops are over; unfortunately, with them went the days spent dreaming and fighting for the dawn of a human race which embraces love and promotes peace and pleads for universal brotherhood..
I think it's bullshit. What would be the point if he died he died plenty of bands have lost members and gone on The Who' drummer Keith Moon, The Rolling Stones founding member Brian Jones... Must I go on death can occur and the band continue. They couldn't keep a secret like this, be for real step back, take a breath.
I think there are multiple McCartney's. That last picture with 3 men who look very similar is sort of what I've been thinking for awhile. There seems to be a round face Paul (original) and a long face Paul (1967-1970s), but then it seems that the round face fella shows up now and then.
Why? Who knows. Maybe the dude just got tired of getting mobbed every day and wanted a break.
i had always thought that all the paul was dead things were BS but you show me somethings i didnt know before. like his nose. that is the one thing that got me. i mean ive looking into this for many years. since 1967. my GOD you are right. he may not have died in 1966 but was replaced.
This would explain Wings and musical abominations such as Ebony and Ivory and the godawful Simply Having A Wonderful Christmas Time, which I'm forced to endure every year. Denny Laine (Penny Lane?) obviously wrote just about everything in Wings, but remained unappreciated and uncredited due to Faul's notorious meanness!
Please, watch the "Paul McCartney is NOT dead comparison". There are several videos, related to this one (at the right of this video). You'll be sure it's the same guy.
It's funny when new generation fans first hears about these rumors. Happened to me when I was a kid. The older fans are just tired of the same "proofs".
What good is comparing a photo of Paul in his 60s with a picture of him in his 20s? People's eye colour changes with age sometimes and you have to consider reflection of light etc.. Facial structure can change very noticably by just losing or gaining a few pounds. I can't believe there are people that still think Paul is dead and was replaced by an exact double and equally fantastic songwriter who just happened to have the exact same talent for making music as Paul.
@41BobDylan and was supposedly left handed. Also, didn't mind leaving his family to become a different person in an incredibly risky situation for the next 50-60 years. Just a ridiculous theory to be honest isn't it?
Jonn Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr died just days after Paul Mccartney died. They too were replaced by exact look alikes and were know as the Featles.... Fohn, Faul,Feorge, and Fingo
I'm pretty sure they had brown contacts in the sixties but they were hard lens and they hurt to wear for a long time. I remember reading about a white journalist who decided to live as a black woman for a while to find out what it was like and write a book about it. She talked about wearing dark contacts and how they hurt to wear all the time. I read that book when in the seventies.
People's eye color can change due to toxin buildup, medications, and various other reasons. Some herbalogists claim there are only two natural eye colors: Brown and Blue. Green is the result of toxin buildup. I'm not sure if I believe that a person can't be born with green eyes, but I do believe that people get more yellow color in their eyes as they age due to toxin buildup.
@grubenhiemer you obviously dont know anything about the beatles, theirs a whole documentary about this, its definitely not the same person, do some research bro
There's also a process known as replacing. The CIA, MI5, and the KGB, as well as many others do this for a living. The original Paul had a higher speaking voice. Faul has a much lower speaking voice. If you can't hear the difference, then you're deaf!
Ironic how people have been catching on lately wen this story has been around since the mid 60s ur mother should kno ur all too late the paul u guys have been looking up to is a faul
Plastyic surgery can only do so much! However, the difference in the color of the eyes would be a dead giveaway. Back then, different color lens were unavailable. So, this proves that someoene is impersonating or taking someone's place due to personal reasons.
The real question is... Who would go through such lengths to do something like this?
Maybe there more to this than meets the eyes? Oh, the thinning of the face in the photo, one would have to lose weight and become physically fit.
Regarding the series of "signs" on the album covers, they could just be a reason for polemic, a way to paly with people, since if they replaced original Paul they would probably not want it to be found, and they probably knew the album covers in detail.
The difference in the angle of his jaw seems to be the undeniable evidence...for the fist time I have paid attention to this.
Besides, the "first Paul seemed to have a more idealistic and slightly melancholic look, whilst the "current " one seems to be just an ordinary guy concerned with ordinary things.
Maybe this is an impersonator, I don't know. Plastic surgery can do a lot, so can capping and also eye colour contacts. Then again, the Abbey Rd cover does say he is deceased. Perhaps we will never know. I have heard that many famous people had 'doubles'. Hitler had three of them, and so did Howard Hughes. Why Paul (or the music Industry Illuminati) want to have a double, I don't know.
Thanks for giving away the clue. The music industry would go through such lengths to keep the money coming in. The recording studios stand to lose plenty of money and since eveyone on earth does have a double or triplet somewhere in this world.
Therefor, the music industry didn't want a scandal, so they would cover any trail that would give this away. Read my reply or comment and you'll know what I'm talking about.
When Williams died, the same thing happened all over again.
If Paul was replaced, it does not necessarily follow that he died. You could prove that the guy who living as PM is not the original. But this in itself does not prove that the original is dead. Two separate things needing separate lines of proof.
1. Ears grow and change shape throughout your entire life. 2. Paul was in an accident and broke his front teeth and they were fixed. You can even see the recently broken teeth in the "Paperback Writer" and "Rain" videos here on You Tube!
@OroborusFMA ears do grow your whole life, but i dont think they detach from your face, when they were previously attached, esp when you see it in 1966 than 1967. but this is interesting, im going to keep looking into this
I am one of the ones who thinks the post '66 Paul was the most creative and talented one. I think he matured and really came into his own once him and John Lennon decided to quit writing "swimming pools" and opened up their range of subject matter and styles. The sadness and dark feelings had to do with their manager dying. He was the fifth Beatle and sorely missed. Also the pressures of celebrity were taking their tolls on the Beatles along with egotism and drug use.
I think it is hard for people to realize someone like Paul Mccartney is aging and imperfect just like the rest of us. There are mythologies about the young beautiful hero taken out early and worshiped thereafter. That is what people want to do with Paul. Idolize a fallen hero. If you do any reading about his earlier career, he never was perfect, just very talented, then and now.
I watched just about all the videos and looked at different websites about the PID thing. Some are quite convincing but after one really thinks about it, the story falls apart. No one can even agree on the imposters name/ origin. I don't think any imposter would have wanted to stay Paul McCartney for all these years. It would really mess with his head, not getting credit for the great music he has put out in his own name. I think an imposter would have faked his death and gone back to own life.
@ejap76 Alot of these PID theorists talk about a contest held for a Paul lookalike. Yet noone shows actual evidence of that occuring whether by Amer. Band Stand or Teen Beat, etc. No one can agree on a date of the death or manner of death. No one can agree on the Imposters name or give details on his past. No one can give a coherent reason why there was a coverup or even agree on the reason. Lack of specifics a hallmark of a hoax.
@autumndays55 why he denied to be a father of a german girl after 66 when he was paying her mom before 66, isn't that weird, he failed his paternity test since he's now FAUL, good luck
@kopenhagen Idk on that one. I guess I don't have all the answers. But here's another thought I have about it; I really don't think the Beatles would find a replacement then put a bunch of clues in their songs . If they were forced by the govt to have a replacement like some surmise, I doubt they'd be outing him. If the govt was involved, and they were putting clues, it was some sort of misdirection for something else.
@kopenhagen I really believe that the Beatles were experimenting with esoteric ideas & drugs and liked to mess around with peoples heads, perceptions. John had read a book about the hero myths/Jesus as myth and talked about it in an interview. They wanted to go beyond just being a rockband. They decided one of them would "die" and be "resurrected". That's one theory I heard on youtube.
@autumndays55 I read that they created the rumours themselves for publicity and all of the clues in the albums were done deliberately. it did increase sales apparently too, who knows
@doitanywayz Yes, Paul made the comment in an interview after the John Lennon "we're bigger than Jesus' thing that people had to buy the records to burn them. They found that any kind of publicity increased sales.
@kopenhagen It could be that Paul didn't want to pay it anymore and figured out a way to fool them, discredit her. Maybe the real Paul sent a double. Lot of money involved.
Paul's children with Linda look like the original Paul.
@ejap76 Psychologically we are all drawn to make meaning, and have our identity matter. I think it would have been harder to stay. I think an imposter would have squirreled away some money, faded away, and when the time was right, he would have faked his own death. But of course, I could be wrong/right and you could be right/wrong. Every scenario can be played out in a different parallel universe.....(-:
As for his changing appearance, lots of celebrities have gotten plastic surgery and wore contacts. I don't know if peoplei noticed but Paul has always been interested in his appearance and changed his hairstyle different ways. Lots of celebrities make changes. All the Beatles changed their style and their appearances changed quite a bit probably due to increasing drug use, Nothing unusual there, either, for celebrities.
First of all the story is that the Govt replaced him to prevent girls from killing themselves but really would the govt be all that worried about a few girls to actually replace a pop star? The other version is that the govt was worried about lost revenue but the Beatles could have found another bass player and kept on going like many other bands have done when faced with a loss,
BULLSHIT...MOTHER NATURE EXACTLY THE SAME GENIUOS IN JUST ONE GENERATION....THERE IS JUST ONE PAUL AND FORTUNATLY IS STILL ALIVE...AND I HOPE FOR MANY MANY YEARS MORE....
check out the side profile of macca's head in the movie Help then check out his side profile in that late video where her plays the mandolin in someones house. I think that video was about 2 years ago. Anyway, he has exactly the same side profile head shape in the movie as he does in that newish video clip. It's a unique shape. This conspiracy stuff is a lot of fun too.
if was highly improbable, it was probably true. just stay safe and warm knowing that your government didn't stage 9/11.....funny that it's your countries emergency number as well....
Watch the movie 'Paul really is dead'.....There are many slightly different stories about Paul's death on line, I feel that the truth is there, if we would link the dots at the right place and right time we would get the real story. I know someone knows the TRUTH, most likely not just one person. One thing is for sure. Paul McCartney 1942-1966. RIP
carry on....the 'new' Paul dentision shows a pretty good similar look, but without his palat being narrow. He has no reason for crowding!!!!!!! I do not have to look at any more pictures at all. I'm 100% he is dead. Crazy how people argue like how did they find someone who had the same talent, well they did not have the same talent. They found someone who can sing, play the gitar and looked someone like him......I could go on and on........
I have started researching his death just a couple of days ago. I was shocked to hear it the first time. I believe you are right and he did die in 1966. I never looked at his pictures before as I did now. I didn't really had to compare, because being a dental hygienist I NOTICED something that so many people would not. The real Paul McCarney had a narrow palat, that is why his teeth were not in great alignment. There is crowding in his mouth for that reason.
so they put clues in songs to tell us secretly. they also denied it on camera many times. so it's as if they wanted to tell us, but they also didn't want to. makes sense to me :D
This is fun to think about but Paul isn't dead. Everyone kind of looks at the fun stuff like album covers and reversed lyrics and not tangible stuff. I'm sure Paul's family wouldn't have let someone just take over his life. Also, what happened to William Campbell who supposedly became Paul. Did he suddenly disappear. Facial features can change, too. Look at Dave Grohl in the I'll Stick Around video and now. They don't look alike at all, really. It's a fun theory but I don't believe it.
When I watch my own pictures I myself would say "This is not the same person!" In the 60 I had blue eyes, after that they went gray, In the 70s and 80s I had a lot of hair and my weigt changed between 75 and 115 Kilos! Now I am 50 years old and my hair gets very rare and my weight is about 125 Kilos! I had no beauty operations and m inside me always the same. just a little more frustated! Love and peace to Sir James Paul mC Cartney who is unique like everyone of us!
Listen, i don't think that he is dead but even if he was than we would never know i think we should just leave it alone. I don't think it they can find someone that looks just like him and i don't think that they could do that good of plastic surgery back than. i guess we may never know.
Ok lets get it right, this is not about him being dead or not. the real question is did they (The Beatles ) put clues in songs or on album covers to make the fans think he died? YES! they did and thats why they lie about it. not to cover-up the death, it never happened! but, to keep the truth of the "Clues" a Mystery..a Magical Mystery
In his older years and who knows he could have had his nose worked on too. His jowls aren't as saggy as they use to be. Ain't nobody gonna look as good as they did when they are young and I've seen plenty of people who look lk a totally different person than when they are young. Doesn't lk like the same person and it's shocking sometimes. That's just life. We all have our turn at youth then mid age and then our senior years! He is a senior now! The dude is almost 70!
Is Alive and he isn't. Oh, don't forget Paul McCartney as well as the other Beatles did a lot of drugs and smoked for years and those are the worst aging factors on a person plus alcohol. You abuse substances enough it's going show like a road map when you age just look at Robert plant, etc. all dried up wrinkled men who look much older than their age. Daddy is a few years younger than Paul and he doesn't look near as old as Paul. Clean livin'. Hey, Paul's had plastice surgery
Sigh, I don't know how old you are but I think you are looking way too deep into this idea. Trust me it's the same person. Photos back in the day were poor quality compared to digital now and it was harder to tell things apart including eye color. Listen his brother and father would have been on the war path to find out how he died if it were true. In the 60's and 70's many men wore the same hair style. My daddy had pork chop sideburns and Elvis style hair of the 70's.Plp still think Elvis
i dont get what the yellow flowers are at the end
gabbitha1x2 13 hours ago
Go to "check the evidence.com" and listen to the recent interview that andrew johnson did with tina foster. and listen to the 2007 gmtv interview with heather mills. and remember that you have been seeing and hearing faul for years so it's hard for your mind to break through the dissonance. at the end of the day if you want to start another money making war in a place like vietnam, you can't have bands going round spreading love and peace.
tacbe4 16 hours ago
The uploader of this video.......you are wrong Paul was not driving to Ringo Starrs house when he was supposely killed in a car crash.....Paul was said to have stormed out of a recording session with the Beatles and then got in his car and then crashed while driving. The truth is it never happened Paul was not killed in a car crash and he was not replaced.
trueblue374 1 day ago
maybe he just had a bad nose job or something
lustalker 1 day ago
If things are so strange and absurd and they make your logical brain get angry it means that it is really true.
paralentor 2 days ago
I think people are taking this Paul Mccartney death thing too far...I believe Paul Mccartney has been harrassed about him being fake and not the real Paul Mccartney with people demanding he take a DNA test. I disagree with people harrassing him just because of some death rumour from 40 odd years ago. Its disgusting that people force their opinions on him in public because of what they`ve seen on the internet when they haven`t any proof that he is a replacement..to harrass him in public is not on
MrIhateconnie 3 days ago
@MrIhateconnie Back in the 70s his voice pattern/sound wave thingy was analysed (as good as the technology of the day could do) and left no doubt that Paul was Paul.
lumbago12 21 hours ago
Very interesting video - enjoyed it but I am left with the distinct impression that the McCartney of recent times is the same as the one from the Cavern simply because of the way he speaks. Of course that is not to say it couldn't be mimicked. I have noticed that faces do change remarkably over the years but not usually in a matter of months. You only have to look at the change in Keith Richard over the years to see how very much a face can alter. But you have got me thinking...hmm?
zthetha 5 days ago
Perhaps he had plastic surgery in 1966, everyone was saying it wasn't him, so he changed it back. Also mabye they put those "Paul is dead" "hints" in things were to spark people's imaginations as a joke. Think Beatles people.
PortalJumper98 5 days ago
how can you compare the ears if the hair is on the way douchebag.
GustavoVillarBatera 5 days ago
I just cannot imagine how a person could be so gullible to believe this rubbish.
Why on earth would they do this? If they did it and decided to keep silent about it forever why release these so called "clues?" Why did not one of his friends or family ever question that this is the real Paul McCartney just the usual conspiracy nut jobs.
Honestly it is just stupid beyond words. And has no basis in reality.
WillShakespeare2007 6 days ago
Reptilian...
cortexlaser 1 week ago
Most stupid thing I ever saw, how can you really believe that. Same thing people said about Elvis Presley, that he still alive.... ppfffffff so funny!!!
comunicacioncctexsa 1 week ago
The Beatles were a tavistock creation, so its more than likely that they also created this conspiracy as a little social experiment...just to fuck with your minds and have you running in circles. Enjoy it
Gaelicfella2011 1 week ago
true or not, this video is really interesting
tonitaurus 1 week ago
So you are saying that the fake Paul wrote Hey Jude then?
luismamh 1 week ago
I agree that the current Paul McCartney is not the same person. Faul is taller, his head is longer and narrower, he has green eyes, and his speaking and singing voice is lower pitched. Good job girl, you added to convincing me!
qvocarlos 1 week ago
incredible..
mrethanist 2 weeks ago
He looked like Rocky. The eyes especially
RockeyMarle 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1966 TO 1967 A FUCKING HECK LOT OF CHANGES CERTAINLY, AND THE GREEN EYES! DEFINITELY NOW I THINK PAUL DIED IN 1966.
TRANFUCKER 2 weeks ago
so lets sum it up, someboy insisted on a double for a band that had well known internal fights afterwards and fell apart in a couple of years. the double had a plastic surgery to change the nose and chin back in 67 to look like "Paul" and then another one some time later so that he could look nothing like Paul again?
f4ust85 2 weeks ago
Have you seen a doctor?
gfsliurt 2 weeks ago
Plastic surgery baby hahaha
ruisoul 2 weeks ago
oh Jesus is it so hard to understand that no one can have the same talent that Paul McCartney has? there is no possibility for someone to have the same fucking good talent.....
despedazador123 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@despedazador123 DUDE, HOW R U SO SURE IT'S THE SAME TALENT? IF IT'S AN IMPOSTER, HE'S OBVIOULSY AN ARTIST TOO, TEHY R NOT GONNA REPLACE HIM WITH A SHOEMAKER. COULDN'T IT BE THAT THIS GUY MADE A LIVING OUT OF FAKING BEING SOMEONE ELSE, AND KEEPING IT ON SECREDCY ALONG WITH THOSE INVOLVED IN THIS SHAM?
TRANFUCKER 2 weeks ago
paul had plastic surgery...hense the nose, and had hazel eyes, that means they change from green to brown to dark green..you didn"t know that? wow
jamrush123 2 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@jamrush123 HAZEL EYES CHANGE? I DIDN'T KNOW THAT.
TRANFUCKER 2 weeks ago
on the back of the sgt peppers cover if you put it up to a mirror theres a number of s funeral home in london
nrail879 3 weeks ago
You're daft. Lennon lost his baby fat & looked really different too. It was the drugs/lifestyle. And someone wearing a similar shirt means that is Paul sitting there? Get a clue. The guy looks more like Lennon to me!
geozipper 3 weeks ago
you should have pointed out that the cover always says "here lies Paul" (the drum [here] the end of the Beatles logo including the trophy [lies] and the flowers [Paul])
shaunnabrook 3 weeks ago
Fuck you! You sad many shit!
faclubecarnenua 3 weeks ago
What a wste of time putting this up together.People's face change overtime with age especially.So whats the problem with the changing looks of Paul Mcca?!LOL this is some funny shit! =D
SCJ7812 3 weeks ago
@zzbrewskiizz im brainwashed? they pulled off the greatest scam in world history, and theres people like you that believe it.
grubenhiemer 3 weeks ago
@rynowens i happen to love the beatles, watched every documentary on the band, play their music,and seen paul mccartney live last year..he didnt die..i cant believe you would be ignorant enough to believe this whole charade and then tell me to do research bro.
grubenhiemer 3 weeks ago
@grubenhiemer okay dude ur brain washed like the gov wants, john lennon and george harrison werent crazy, why would they give clues in every song they ever made after that wednesday morning in 1966?? paul mccartney died
zzbrewskizz 3 weeks ago
We should jump on the Magical Mystery Tour to find out....
TheMonkeesRock 3 weeks ago
Dont your eyes change colour over time? i mean mine used to be green but now their blue, over a considerable number of years ofcourse not like over night, and ofcourse unknown conditions etc etc, this is paul, all you conspiracy lovers let it go....and even if it was an "imposter" listen to him, bloody amazing lol
lanceparker12 3 weeks ago
I have to say that the two Pauls do actually look a little different, but I certanly don't believe Paul McCartney died in a car accident in 1966 and that they replaced him with an identical twin that looks and sounds just like him and can play exactly the same instuments Paul played with the same skill. Nice choice of music though.
chiprahn 3 weeks ago
Oh, I know! There were 3 Pauls..triplets! And seriously, it's not that the nose and ears continue to grow, but the rest of the face actually shrinks and/or sags, as grubenhiemer says, it's AGING! This hoax was all said in done and ended in 1968, but 'we' are obsessed with mysterious 'what ifs'. And now the younger generation thinks they've stumbled upon this conspiratory revelation. Guess what.. Its over, been over since 1968. If you still believe Paul is dead, the jokes still on you.
Dancewith6 3 weeks ago 3
@Dancewith6 exactly
grubenhiemer 3 weeks ago
How can you be so sure? I mean the three Paul's thing is just ridiculous. one of those men are Lennon, and I can't quite tell you who the other was, but the rumour that Paul is dead wasn't released into the public until 1969. If you watch The documentary of George Harrison's final Testament you will find yourself question your very own beliefs. I completely disagreed with everybody when they said Paul was dead, but now I have myself guessing as well.
fullhair47 1 week ago
@fullhair47 Oh I guess I got the year wrong. It was a long time ago, seems like it was 68 to me. How amazing they could find such an exact look alike, sound alike with the same writing ability, etc., etc. You will believe what you choose to believe.
Dancewith6 1 week ago
I recently watched a documentary titled "Paul McCartney Really is Dead", so many of the so called facts just don't add up. For one thing to find a look alike is one thing but to find a perfect vocal match is another, I love early Beatles as much as the later but if Paul was replaced by Faul then what and incredible talent "Faul" was!!!, All the later Beatles songs as well as all the songs he did with Wings, If that was Faul then he was every bit as talented as the real Paul ever was or could be.
XS227 3 weeks ago
I don't believe Paul is dead, but can anyone explain why Paul's eyes colour changed?
HKwong0502 3 weeks ago
@HKwong0502 It's all in the photography.. Or perhaps when he got older and richer he chose tinted contacts.
Dancewith6 3 weeks ago
I heard Chuck Norris died and was replaced. Is it okay to replace the first letter of his name with "F"?
FaintHeartbeat 4 weeks ago 13
@FaintHeartbeat
Chuck Forris? He'd kill you for that...
7hac 3 weeks ago
people can keep debunking this video all they want but tell me how do you go from brown eyes to green? :S
lovejohnniebear24 4 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@lovejohnniebear24 :people can keep debunking this video all they want but tell me how do you go from brown eyes to green? :S
my answer: Contact lens??
Somonein1997 4 weeks ago
@lovejohnniebear24 He's Paul McCartney! He can do many magical things!
FaintHeartbeat 4 weeks ago 11
OH BOY..... THIS IS CRAP..........
TomWaitsNYC 4 weeks ago
idiot
RockChannelEurope 1 month ago
então acharam um cara praticamente igual ao paul e com a mesma capacidade de compor musicas incriveis??? tecnologia né?
MatheusDuarteBenther 1 month ago
As an artist; I can tell you that facial features may appear different due to lighting conditions; how the shadows are cast, also the images are at a slightly different angle. Not to mention; everyone ages; it's a part of life...If it's not really Paul, the fake Paul has been around longer than the real one and wrote countless hits such as Let it be, Another day, sing the changes...as well as memory almost full. What next, are you going to say John and George are alive?
markrobinault 1 month ago 2
It's Paul notice he has a droopy left eye
leiscwf 1 month ago
Comment removed
RelaxFloatDownStream 1 month ago 2
It is weird, as his chin is wider in that first 1967 picture... BUT... whoever he is today, i rate him, cos the beatles music got better after 1966, PLUS, from wings alone, "maybe i'm amazed", which is the greatest love ballard of all fuckin time, AND... he stayed with his first wife for over 3 decades, till death did they part... total fuckin respect to him whoever he is... Paul or Faul.... um cheh, um check it, um check it owt. but i do like a good conspiracy, so keep up the good work guys A+
AmsterdamnedMovie 1 month ago
Comment removed
mate0107 1 month ago
its very much difference betwen them
and also, the real paul looks a bit like sylvester stalone
justarandomgiirl1 1 month ago
omg! maybe is true?? :O
justarandomgiirl1 1 month ago
His voice sounds similar still..
hamnet99 1 month ago
Paul McCartney has a one in a kind face! Nobody could ever look that much like him! Also if you watch him in really old interviews and previous interviews, he sounds exactly the same and his head bobs the same way and his lips move the same way and everything he says and does is the same! If you believe this bullshit there is something wrong with your brain!
36dancegirl 1 month ago
I'm still freak out about the eyes
nicky032096 1 month ago
hahaha, like how ur comparing pictures from like when hes sixty to when he was in his twenties. Take a look ur baby pictures, MAYBE YOU DIED TOO!!
schnemaa1 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's called weight loss and weight gain, and stress. it's not like the touring and the drugs could have been the best for him so you get long faced paul. Not touring no stress eating better the dude put on a bit of weight. and as far as the eye color goes cameras sucked ass back then you never really knew what you might get. So the person who thinks it's a conspiricy, I think you are kind of a moron. Just my opinion.
userflynnn2 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
it's called weight loss and weight gain, and stress. it's not like the touring and the drugs could have been the best for him so you get long faced paul. Not touring no stress eating better the dude put on a bit of weight. and as far as the eye color goes cameras sucked ass back then you never really knew what you might get. So the person who thinks it's a conspiricy, I think you are kind of a moron. Just my opinion.
userflynnn2 1 month ago
it's called weight loss and weight gain, and stress. it's not like the touring and the drugs could have been the best for him so you get long faced paul. Not touring no stress eating better the dude put on a bit of weight. and as far as the eye color goes cameras sucked ass back then you never really knew what you might get. So the person who thinks it's a conspiricy, I think you are kind of a moron. Just my opinion.
userflynnn2 1 month ago
how do you know if this is jus a hoax
forsetfire101 1 month ago
How do we know If it's....PID...or, did he just have "Plastic surgery in 67." Oh, yeah--there is that problem with the color of his eyes--is it Hazel or Brown? Or, Green....? Then there is his strange ear problems---ok,ok,.....PID!
billy38010 1 month ago
People change as they age and you can clearly see throughout the video how similar his face is. The eyes look exactly the same shape. What lunatics believe this crap? Scary people..
YTRonaldMcDonald 1 month ago
I thought this rumor was crushed in the 60s.. how can you really believe this? C'mon Youtube, people get older, and they age. No disrespect, but I'm sure that no baby boomer looks entirely like their former self, the days of cut-off's and tube tops are over; unfortunately, with them went the days spent dreaming and fighting for the dawn of a human race which embraces love and promotes peace and pleads for universal brotherhood..
This Generation X of ours needs some purpose..
ayetugger 1 month ago
I think it's bullshit. What would be the point if he died he died plenty of bands have lost members and gone on The Who' drummer Keith Moon, The Rolling Stones founding member Brian Jones... Must I go on death can occur and the band continue. They couldn't keep a secret like this, be for real step back, take a breath.
Rollingstones1963 1 month ago
at 2:08 im pretty sure the picture on the right is when he was with wings...
22MrSamuel 1 month ago
I think there are multiple McCartney's. That last picture with 3 men who look very similar is sort of what I've been thinking for awhile. There seems to be a round face Paul (original) and a long face Paul (1967-1970s), but then it seems that the round face fella shows up now and then.
Why? Who knows. Maybe the dude just got tired of getting mobbed every day and wanted a break.
Bocasean 1 month ago 2
who else thinks what is said to be the last photo of the real mccartney looks like rocky? XD
Yanksuk2007 1 month ago
WHY???
cruisersism 1 month ago
lol, i remember when all this occured, i was a kid hearing these things. dam im old :P
unknownhoserz 1 month ago
am i realy dead or was i replaced?
7theflyingdutchman 1 month ago
i had always thought that all the paul was dead things were BS but you show me somethings i didnt know before. like his nose. that is the one thing that got me. i mean ive looking into this for many years. since 1967. my GOD you are right. he may not have died in 1966 but was replaced.
7theflyingdutchman 1 month ago
This would explain Wings and musical abominations such as Ebony and Ivory and the godawful Simply Having A Wonderful Christmas Time, which I'm forced to endure every year. Denny Laine (Penny Lane?) obviously wrote just about everything in Wings, but remained unappreciated and uncredited due to Faul's notorious meanness!
Mokkor 1 month ago
Please, watch the "Paul McCartney is NOT dead comparison". There are several videos, related to this one (at the right of this video). You'll be sure it's the same guy.
It's funny when new generation fans first hears about these rumors. Happened to me when I was a kid. The older fans are just tired of the same "proofs".
VoceTubeia 1 month ago
the fake paul has a longer skinnier head
inFAMOUS581 1 month ago
@ 0:58 He does look very different! especially the nose and eyes colour, that normally can't change!!
jujukoko 1 month ago
i cant belive im reading this shite. i cant believe someone took the time to put this shite together.
WillGrahamDublin 1 month ago
Interesting video,first time I have seen it.Not convinced he died. The talent he has , is not replaceable.
bcortese100 1 month ago
Why do people waste their life making up garbage?
mitchiethekid100 1 month ago 3
i dont understand poul died or live?
liron1449 1 month ago
wtf
hellp990 1 month ago
My eyes went from blue to hazel... Eye colors change.
JacobSly1 1 month ago
What good is comparing a photo of Paul in his 60s with a picture of him in his 20s? People's eye colour changes with age sometimes and you have to consider reflection of light etc.. Facial structure can change very noticably by just losing or gaining a few pounds. I can't believe there are people that still think Paul is dead and was replaced by an exact double and equally fantastic songwriter who just happened to have the exact same talent for making music as Paul.
41BobDylan 1 month ago
@41BobDylan and was supposedly left handed. Also, didn't mind leaving his family to become a different person in an incredibly risky situation for the next 50-60 years. Just a ridiculous theory to be honest isn't it?
5786Dan 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Jonn Lennon, George Harrison and Ringo Starr died just days after Paul Mccartney died. They too were replaced by exact look alikes and were know as the Featles.... Fohn, Faul,Feorge, and Fingo
tnc07232008 1 month ago
I'm pretty sure they had brown contacts in the sixties but they were hard lens and they hurt to wear for a long time. I remember reading about a white journalist who decided to live as a black woman for a while to find out what it was like and write a book about it. She talked about wearing dark contacts and how they hurt to wear all the time. I read that book when in the seventies.
autumndays55 1 month ago
People's eye color can change due to toxin buildup, medications, and various other reasons. Some herbalogists claim there are only two natural eye colors: Brown and Blue. Green is the result of toxin buildup. I'm not sure if I believe that a person can't be born with green eyes, but I do believe that people get more yellow color in their eyes as they age due to toxin buildup.
autumndays55 1 month ago
If paul died the beatles would have told the public immediately
MrBiggestbeatlestfan 1 month ago
I don't know if youve heard, but there is such a process known as ageing.
grubenhiemer 1 month ago 24
@grubenhiemer You tell them everyone ages!!!
MrBiggestbeatlestfan 1 month ago
Comment removed
birminghambred 1 month ago
@grubenhiemer Didn't know your eyes can change colour with age ? :/
birminghambred 1 month ago
@grubenhiemer you obviously dont know anything about the beatles, theirs a whole documentary about this, its definitely not the same person, do some research bro
rynowens 3 weeks ago
@grubenhiemer
There's also a process known as replacing. The CIA, MI5, and the KGB, as well as many others do this for a living. The original Paul had a higher speaking voice. Faul has a much lower speaking voice. If you can't hear the difference, then you're deaf!
qvocarlos 3 weeks ago
Ironic how people have been catching on lately wen this story has been around since the mid 60s ur mother should kno ur all too late the paul u guys have been looking up to is a faul
notwithoutmyCarcass 1 month ago
But wait, all of those "current" photos were of a celebrity impersonator. It says who on the photos in,
1:02
1:07
1:30
2:09
Plus, the picture in the middle at 3:07 is from a different photo.
1155dc 2 months ago
Asshole
iowdave 2 months ago 2
Plastyic surgery can only do so much! However, the difference in the color of the eyes would be a dead giveaway. Back then, different color lens were unavailable. So, this proves that someoene is impersonating or taking someone's place due to personal reasons.
The real question is... Who would go through such lengths to do something like this?
Maybe there more to this than meets the eyes? Oh, the thinning of the face in the photo, one would have to lose weight and become physically fit.
radarlovemusic 2 months ago
Regarding the series of "signs" on the album covers, they could just be a reason for polemic, a way to paly with people, since if they replaced original Paul they would probably not want it to be found, and they probably knew the album covers in detail.
denisliossi 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
The difference in the angle of his jaw seems to be the undeniable evidence...for the fist time I have paid attention to this.
Besides, the "first Paul seemed to have a more idealistic and slightly melancholic look, whilst the "current " one seems to be just an ordinary guy concerned with ordinary things.
Anyway, I like both.
denisliossi 2 months ago
Comment removed
denisliossi 2 months ago
Maybe this is an impersonator, I don't know. Plastic surgery can do a lot, so can capping and also eye colour contacts. Then again, the Abbey Rd cover does say he is deceased. Perhaps we will never know. I have heard that many famous people had 'doubles'. Hitler had three of them, and so did Howard Hughes. Why Paul (or the music Industry Illuminati) want to have a double, I don't know.
ziatease 2 months ago
@ziatease
Thanks for giving away the clue. The music industry would go through such lengths to keep the money coming in. The recording studios stand to lose plenty of money and since eveyone on earth does have a double or triplet somewhere in this world.
Therefor, the music industry didn't want a scandal, so they would cover any trail that would give this away. Read my reply or comment and you'll know what I'm talking about.
When Williams died, the same thing happened all over again.
radarlovemusic 2 months ago
If Paul was replaced, it does not necessarily follow that he died. You could prove that the guy who living as PM is not the original. But this in itself does not prove that the original is dead. Two separate things needing separate lines of proof.
autumndays55 2 months ago
Bollocks
3603089 2 months ago
1. Ears grow and change shape throughout your entire life. 2. Paul was in an accident and broke his front teeth and they were fixed. You can even see the recently broken teeth in the "Paperback Writer" and "Rain" videos here on You Tube!
OroborusFMA 2 months ago 14
@OroborusFMA ears do grow your whole life, but i dont think they detach from your face, when they were previously attached, esp when you see it in 1966 than 1967. but this is interesting, im going to keep looking into this
jumppack1 2 months ago
@OroborusFMA explain thhe eye color change then
thedevilisaloser666 1 month ago
@OroborusFMA And also wear green contact lenses.
In some pictures from 1964-1966 Paul wear glasses.
lopezchau1 1 month ago
I am one of the ones who thinks the post '66 Paul was the most creative and talented one. I think he matured and really came into his own once him and John Lennon decided to quit writing "swimming pools" and opened up their range of subject matter and styles. The sadness and dark feelings had to do with their manager dying. He was the fifth Beatle and sorely missed. Also the pressures of celebrity were taking their tolls on the Beatles along with egotism and drug use.
autumndays55 2 months ago
i dont see any messages help me :'(
thatguywithpantson 2 months ago
I think it is hard for people to realize someone like Paul Mccartney is aging and imperfect just like the rest of us. There are mythologies about the young beautiful hero taken out early and worshiped thereafter. That is what people want to do with Paul. Idolize a fallen hero. If you do any reading about his earlier career, he never was perfect, just very talented, then and now.
autumndays55 2 months ago
I watched just about all the videos and looked at different websites about the PID thing. Some are quite convincing but after one really thinks about it, the story falls apart. No one can even agree on the imposters name/ origin. I don't think any imposter would have wanted to stay Paul McCartney for all these years. It would really mess with his head, not getting credit for the great music he has put out in his own name. I think an imposter would have faked his death and gone back to own life.
autumndays55 2 months ago
@autumndays55 If the imposter has been living as Paul for so long, it would be very very hard to just STOP being Paul, not vice versa. Just sayin'.
ejap76 2 months ago
@ejap76 Alot of these PID theorists talk about a contest held for a Paul lookalike. Yet noone shows actual evidence of that occuring whether by Amer. Band Stand or Teen Beat, etc. No one can agree on a date of the death or manner of death. No one can agree on the Imposters name or give details on his past. No one can give a coherent reason why there was a coverup or even agree on the reason. Lack of specifics a hallmark of a hoax.
autumndays55 2 months ago
@autumndays55 why he denied to be a father of a german girl after 66 when he was paying her mom before 66, isn't that weird, he failed his paternity test since he's now FAUL, good luck
kopenhagen 2 months ago in playlist PM DEAD
@kopenhagen Idk on that one. I guess I don't have all the answers. But here's another thought I have about it; I really don't think the Beatles would find a replacement then put a bunch of clues in their songs . If they were forced by the govt to have a replacement like some surmise, I doubt they'd be outing him. If the govt was involved, and they were putting clues, it was some sort of misdirection for something else.
autumndays55 2 months ago
@kopenhagen I really believe that the Beatles were experimenting with esoteric ideas & drugs and liked to mess around with peoples heads, perceptions. John had read a book about the hero myths/Jesus as myth and talked about it in an interview. They wanted to go beyond just being a rockband. They decided one of them would "die" and be "resurrected". That's one theory I heard on youtube.
autumndays55 2 months ago
@autumndays55 I read that they created the rumours themselves for publicity and all of the clues in the albums were done deliberately. it did increase sales apparently too, who knows
doitanywayz 2 months ago
@doitanywayz Yes, Paul made the comment in an interview after the John Lennon "we're bigger than Jesus' thing that people had to buy the records to burn them. They found that any kind of publicity increased sales.
autumndays55 1 month ago
@kopenhagen It could be that Paul didn't want to pay it anymore and figured out a way to fool them, discredit her. Maybe the real Paul sent a double. Lot of money involved.
Paul's children with Linda look like the original Paul.
autumndays55 2 months ago
@ejap76 Psychologically we are all drawn to make meaning, and have our identity matter. I think it would have been harder to stay. I think an imposter would have squirreled away some money, faded away, and when the time was right, he would have faked his own death. But of course, I could be wrong/right and you could be right/wrong. Every scenario can be played out in a different parallel universe.....(-:
autumndays55 2 months ago
As for his changing appearance, lots of celebrities have gotten plastic surgery and wore contacts. I don't know if peoplei noticed but Paul has always been interested in his appearance and changed his hairstyle different ways. Lots of celebrities make changes. All the Beatles changed their style and their appearances changed quite a bit probably due to increasing drug use, Nothing unusual there, either, for celebrities.
autumndays55 2 months ago
First of all the story is that the Govt replaced him to prevent girls from killing themselves but really would the govt be all that worried about a few girls to actually replace a pop star? The other version is that the govt was worried about lost revenue but the Beatles could have found another bass player and kept on going like many other bands have done when faced with a loss,
autumndays55 2 months ago
BULLSHIT...MOTHER NATURE EXACTLY THE SAME GENIUOS IN JUST ONE GENERATION....THERE IS JUST ONE PAUL AND FORTUNATLY IS STILL ALIVE...AND I HOPE FOR MANY MANY YEARS MORE....
joruva 2 months ago
check out the side profile of macca's head in the movie Help then check out his side profile in that late video where her plays the mandolin in someones house. I think that video was about 2 years ago. Anyway, he has exactly the same side profile head shape in the movie as he does in that newish video clip. It's a unique shape. This conspiracy stuff is a lot of fun too.
moo2thetube 2 months ago
if was highly improbable, it was probably true. just stay safe and warm knowing that your government didn't stage 9/11.....funny that it's your countries emergency number as well....
7hac 2 months ago
Even if they could find a Paul look alike, they could NOT find a musician who looks, plays and sings just like him!!
marguitar1 2 months ago
it's a fact that eyes get dimmer with age, so that's wrong
muffincheesepie 2 months ago
Watch the movie 'Paul really is dead'.....There are many slightly different stories about Paul's death on line, I feel that the truth is there, if we would link the dots at the right place and right time we would get the real story. I know someone knows the TRUTH, most likely not just one person. One thing is for sure. Paul McCartney 1942-1966. RIP
andrealegeny 2 months ago
@andrealegeny which one is that? the one where they used those "last testament of george harrison" tapes?
Blompcube 2 months ago
carry on....the 'new' Paul dentision shows a pretty good similar look, but without his palat being narrow. He has no reason for crowding!!!!!!! I do not have to look at any more pictures at all. I'm 100% he is dead. Crazy how people argue like how did they find someone who had the same talent, well they did not have the same talent. They found someone who can sing, play the gitar and looked someone like him......I could go on and on........
andrealegeny 2 months ago
I have started researching his death just a couple of days ago. I was shocked to hear it the first time. I believe you are right and he did die in 1966. I never looked at his pictures before as I did now. I didn't really had to compare, because being a dental hygienist I NOTICED something that so many people would not. The real Paul McCarney had a narrow palat, that is why his teeth were not in great alignment. There is crowding in his mouth for that reason.
andrealegeny 2 months ago
he was pronounced dead at the hospital so...
BATTLEFEELD3 2 months ago
paul mccartney looks different in all his pictures. duh! its called LOGIC. its rly him.
auggiej1 2 months ago
this is sad, im srry. paul mccartney isnt dead! you weirdos. XD it wouldnt make any sense
auggiej1 2 months ago
so they put clues in songs to tell us secretly. they also denied it on camera many times. so it's as if they wanted to tell us, but they also didn't want to. makes sense to me :D
grevejp44 2 months ago
Haha even if he did die, post-1966 McCartney is much better than pre-1966, so who cares anyways.
michaelhays92 2 months ago
the "3 Paul's on a boat" is wow! Never seen that one before.
guybassman09 2 months ago
This is fun to think about but Paul isn't dead. Everyone kind of looks at the fun stuff like album covers and reversed lyrics and not tangible stuff. I'm sure Paul's family wouldn't have let someone just take over his life. Also, what happened to William Campbell who supposedly became Paul. Did he suddenly disappear. Facial features can change, too. Look at Dave Grohl in the I'll Stick Around video and now. They don't look alike at all, really. It's a fun theory but I don't believe it.
TheSilverhawaiian 2 months ago
When I watch my own pictures I myself would say "This is not the same person!" In the 60 I had blue eyes, after that they went gray, In the 70s and 80s I had a lot of hair and my weigt changed between 75 and 115 Kilos! Now I am 50 years old and my hair gets very rare and my weight is about 125 Kilos! I had no beauty operations and m inside me always the same. just a little more frustated! Love and peace to Sir James Paul mC Cartney who is unique like everyone of us!
felkro61 2 months ago
1:02 IT LOOKS LIKE HIM SORRY YOU NEED GLASSES
lovethebeatles03 2 months ago
Listen, i don't think that he is dead but even if he was than we would never know i think we should just leave it alone. I don't think it they can find someone that looks just like him and i don't think that they could do that good of plastic surgery back than. i guess we may never know.
lovethebeatles03 2 months ago
sorry for my ignorance, but what is the message in sgt. Peppers album 4:20?
9137r0 2 months ago
@9137r0 Its in the shape of a violin bass guitar and it looks like its spells the word 'Paul?'
derfnor 2 months ago
God, the "Paul" on the boat with the moustache is DEREK TAYLOR, please have correct information before post a video about it.
hofner96 2 months ago
Why are people trying so hard to prove he's dead? Just suck it up, and stop trying. He's alive.
JABILOPsfriend 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
1:07 same nose.
misscarly12 2 months ago
Comment removed
misscarly12 2 months ago
1:10 same nose.
misscarly12 2 months ago
Eye color can change as you age dawg.
HornedWarMachine 2 months ago
1:02 how can you fake those eyes? They are exactly the same. Look at the eyelids.
panchogordo1 2 months ago
LMAO....idiots
basenjib123 2 months ago
@rog944 could you please provide the link ?
kopenhagen 2 months ago
@kopenhagen watch?v=FsPCQ932vlU
rog944 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Ok lets get it right, this is not about him being dead or not. the real question is did they (The Beatles ) put clues in songs or on album covers to make the fans think he died? YES! they did and thats why they lie about it. not to cover-up the death, it never happened! but, to keep the truth of the "Clues" a Mystery..a Magical Mystery
pauldavidvellner 2 months ago
Uh...Heather killed and buried him.
kevinSpencer2 2 months ago
In his older years and who knows he could have had his nose worked on too. His jowls aren't as saggy as they use to be. Ain't nobody gonna look as good as they did when they are young and I've seen plenty of people who look lk a totally different person than when they are young. Doesn't lk like the same person and it's shocking sometimes. That's just life. We all have our turn at youth then mid age and then our senior years! He is a senior now! The dude is almost 70!
paigetncat 3 months ago
Is Alive and he isn't. Oh, don't forget Paul McCartney as well as the other Beatles did a lot of drugs and smoked for years and those are the worst aging factors on a person plus alcohol. You abuse substances enough it's going show like a road map when you age just look at Robert plant, etc. all dried up wrinkled men who look much older than their age. Daddy is a few years younger than Paul and he doesn't look near as old as Paul. Clean livin'. Hey, Paul's had plastice surgery
paigetncat 3 months ago
Sigh, I don't know how old you are but I think you are looking way too deep into this idea. Trust me it's the same person. Photos back in the day were poor quality compared to digital now and it was harder to tell things apart including eye color. Listen his brother and father would have been on the war path to find out how he died if it were true. In the 60's and 70's many men wore the same hair style. My daddy had pork chop sideburns and Elvis style hair of the 70's.Plp still think Elvis
paigetncat 3 months ago
WTF cares. The new Paul dud the most work so he's Paul and deserves the kudos
rahsun29 3 months ago