For $1.20/ea we can mail a "For Liberty Re-cut" DVD and a Super Brochure to 1 Republican Supervoter, accompanied by a letter from New York Times' best-selling author Thomas E. Woods.
I'd like to know how Cain got that job as the head of the regional Fed. Is he especially good at adding a string of zeroes after ones, or something? Was it his ambition he pursued, or was it handed to him? If handed to him, by whom?
@MillionthUsername ... Herman Cain was appointed to head the Fed Regional office by a Republican President. Probably Bush's father, who also gave us Clarence Thomas.
The Patriot Act is totally unconstitutional-----how many times do we need to state this obvious and glaring fact. There is literally no area of it's provisions that are Constitutional. Thank you Tom Woods and elect Ron Paul for President in 2012. His actions speak even more clearly than his words as he is a true American Patriot.
@buckeyemike81 The patriot act is more than just sharing information. It also allows them to hold you indefinitely without counsel, or sneak and peak which allows them to secretly search your home without warrant or even letting you know they did it. There is so much more that it allows the government to do and all they have to do is say you "could" be a threat to national security. It is a complete and utter violation of your constitutional rights, and if your ok with that then that is sad.
@MrJtaber9259 When we lose a city to a nuclear attack you will find out what a real police state is. The Patriot Act is needed to fix stupidity caused by unelected bureaucrats (Jamie Gorelick). There's no reason that the CIA and FBI shouldn't communicate with each other. Sometimes a sneak and peek (which does need a FISA warrant) is necessary to not tip off the criminals about an investigation.
@buckeyemike81 (1)What specific part of the U.S. Constitution authorizes a Patriot's Act? If you don't support the Constitution you are no conservative and if you believe in warrentless searches you do not believe in our constitution(2)We are more likely to attract the bad guys to our shores if we continue meddling in the affairs of other nations(3)We will better protect ourselves if we up our overseas intelligence gathering & build a swiss style national defense(without a draft of course).
@sleedolfine15 1)Article 2 Section 2, these aren't criminals, this is a war, the president manages the defense. George Washington was successful in the revolution mostly because of his intelligence network. 2) Fighting terrorism doesn't cause terrorism 3)Why bother having increased intelligence services if laws put in place by the Clinton administration bind their hands to make them useless? The Patriot Act allows communication of various intelligence agencies.
@buckeyemike81 Article 2 Section 2 doesn't give the president the authority to over rule the 4th amendment which the Act does when it lowers standards for wire tapping & when it allows the FBI the authority to search private records without a court order,etc. When Timothy McVeigh committed the 2nd worst terrorist act in U.S. history I don't remember it being called an act of war. Interferring in another nation's affairs,propping up dictators,etc, does cause terrorism. Remember the Shah of Iran?
@sleedolfine15 The FBI is not granted that power, they need a FISA warrant. This practice was already in place for drug dealers and mobsters of not notifying them when a search (with warrant) took place. McVeigh thought his actions were an act of war even if you don't think of it that way, German saboteurs caught in WWII on the east coast were ruled to be engaged in warfare. If we would have defended the Shah we'd be in a much safer world, we hung him out to dry like we just did with Mubarak.
@buckeyemike81 Under FISA a small number of cases with a foreign connection, were sent to a secret court to grant search warrents without the usual requirement for probable cause. Under the Patriot's Act what had been a rare,albeit unconstitutional exception to the 4th amendment became frequently used. Germany was a nation--not a group, with whom we had a declared war. McVeigh was tried in court,as were Mafia crooks. Iran is a problem because of our 1953 coup done for iranian oil.
@sleedolfine15 Ok so you agree that you are a liar and warrants are required, and you knew that all along, but you now want to change your argument that the requirements for those warrants are insufficient? What difference does it make if it's a UN recognized nation-state or an organized group with the same goal of waging war on Americans? This is a ridiculous distinction that is not in the constitution, it doesn't say we can only defend ourselves from nation-states.
@buckeyemike81 Liar,huh? Well,I've tried to be civil to you even though I believe that people like you are what is destroying this great country. But,you are clearly no gentleman or lady,as the case my be,and although I do have an answer to your rather ridiculous point of view,engaging you is clearly a waste since I choose not to roll around in the mud with you. I know that infantile types like you need the last word,so go to it,but remember I will not be reading your comments.
@sleedolfine15 You claimed that the FBI can do warrantless searches, but when I mentioned the FISA warrants you clearly knew exactly what I was talking about. So you were intentionally saying something you knew to be untrue. I'll consult Webster, but I believe the English word to describe someone who does that is "liar."
Terryweb - You do or you'd be on another video/channel. If people listened to Tom Woods more (and people like him) we'd not be in the mess we're in. GTFO.
Tom I appreciate your video. As to answers you feel that the candidates are not clear on, run for office and we will see how clear you will answer on gray areas. As for Ron Paul, he can talk the talk always stopping short of winning. I feel he can walk the walk to the bank with his campaign money with no problem. Pontification with out the courage to follow through? But he can follow his campaign money to the bank. Always stopping short of winning.
There is certainly much to admire in Herman Cain, but Thomas Woods does bring up some rather damnable evidence that he might be unsuitable for the Republican nominee.
The most serious, in my opinion, is his support for the TARP bailouts, suggesting that Cain is another Big Gov't/Big Business crony, which is precisely what this nation does not need.
Nobody is calling Herman Cain a "Tea Party favorite." He supported the bailouts, was on the Federal Reserve and supports adding another tax. He is all for big government, which is 100% against the Tea Party's goals.
TOM good stuff & why wouldn't you run for some office to make a difference!! Won't be long before he will be exposed for his soulstunting antics when he was young...FACT!!! Skeletons really hurt when someone opens the closet...FACT!!
You can tell just how out of touch the GOP is by the candidates they have chosen to represent the party. I say "they" have chosen because they would love to exclude Ron Paul, ironically the only "Republican" with a real vision to change this nightmare the government has become.
Dan Phillips of the 'Conservative Heritage Times' wrote a really good article "Herman Cain Does Not Get The Federal Reserve Issue" google it and read it.
mpeach this puppet O B O M B M A , leave the White House O B O M B M A, just GTFO don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. Take down the federal reserve. It is not federal! and has no reserve! They want you to focus on Wall Street. Keep the pressure up there also, but really hit out at the feds If you doubt about what is happening watch this.
@VictorLepanto wait till the feds ramsack your house and phone without you even knowing it, without any warrant, maybe that's what it has to come to for people to wake up to the fact that our freedom is being stolen...not to protect us, but to further control us. They could get warrants during war, war is just an excuse, part of the fear mongering. There is a reason the constitution and bill of rights are the law of the land, now we just need to actually follow it...and Ron Paul knows it best.
@therotaryrocket: Wait until some jihadi explodes himself on an airplane you're flying in. What does it take for blame America 1st types like you & Wrong Paul to wake & face the fact we are at war w/ a genocidal enemy, who thinks God has commanded him to expterminate everyone who isn't a Moslem?
@VictorLepanto Maybe you oughtta do a little more research before you come to such drastic conclusions that some news media told you to think. According to Robert Pape at Chicago? University, whom has studied every recorded suicide bombing incident, they are 98% motivated by OCCUPATION. That means our American military bases and troops patrolling their streets killing and oppressing their people, is the reason they attack. Even Micheal Scheur, the head of Bin Laden CIA unit has said it.........
@therotaryrocket Wouldn't you be more inclined to trust our own CIA and other highly educated figures rather than some political rhetoric and media directed at robbing us blind, and using war as an excuse to make massive profits for their buddies? Besides it's common sense, but I guess that's what's really missing nowadays. Watch these vids for a little insight
@therotaryrocket: So you're a member of the Hate America, Blame America Committe. Michael Scheur is little better then a Nazi w/ his reflexive always blame Israel policy. I would have hoped the world would have learned its lesson w/ Chamberlain's betrayal of Czechoslovakia to Nazi tyranny. I guess some people are too stupid to ever learn. Or else they actually prefer Nazis.
@VictorLepanto Actually I love America, but I guess I really don't like our corrupt, taken over government. That's why I advocate Ron Paul. He actually wants to restore America to the great country it once was. Return us to the confines of the great Constitution and attitudes of the founding fathers whom really did love freedom. Have you ever even read the Declaration of Independence or Constitution? Your hate comments are irrational and obviously uneducated. Your comparison is irrelevant.......
@therotaryrocket ..Chamberlain in attempt to avoid direct confrontation with Hitler, decided to allow the Munich Agreement to avoid war. Besides the 'terrorists' are hardly Nazi's, the real Nazi's would be more like those that invade and destroy other countries on their grounds with no real threat (merely a group of people to hate, a cover for their profiteering and global power agenda). "When the subconscious mind doesn’t find any solution to a certain problem it uses hatred as a final resort."
@therotaryrocket: fortunately our Founders were utterly unlike Wrong Paul & they left us a constitution that in no wise resembles his insane suicidal libertarian notions.
I would demand from you that you answer a few questions that are necessary to this issue: Are we at war w/ Al Qaeda & other similar forms of radical Islam, like in Iran. Are they a mortal threat to us & much of the rest or humanity as well? If we are @ war then war powers apply.
@VictorLepanto No one in Washington is more inline with the ideals and actions the founders represented than Dr. Paul. It's obvious though, that if you don't know that, your speaking out of your a**, because the truth is in the facts and history. Typical of a tyrannical gov't supporter that you'd demand something from me, words of force, words that imply no freedom. Are we at war? Technically NO, we have not declared war. Wars must be declared thru congress, whom represents the people.......
@therotaryrocket ........And considering the fact that well over half of Americans disprove of our current wars, if we did uphold the rule of law as we should, then no we wouldn't be involved. In fact, we would've never pissed them off because following the advice of the founders and the constitution, we would've never been dealing in their internal affairs. Why is it so hard to accept the truth? War is the most horrible thing to ever exist anyways.
@therotaryrocket: Wrong Paul knows about as much about our Founders as a pig knows about Sunday. It is all too obvious that Wrong Paul is a racist, an antisemite & an America hater. Anyone who would say as he did that the people on 9/11 somehow deserved to die for America's sins is a psychotic bastard. I'd like him to specify what sins America committed which somehow 'PROVOKED" that action. But I know what he means, he means helping the "Zionist Entity."
@VictorLepanto he'san anti semite but he's "helping the zionist entity" If you come on youtube to provoke or to be an adgitator atleast make sense.As for what the US gov did.When madeline albright was asked if the sanctions on iraq were worth the lives of 500000 iraqi children she said yes.So you tell me .
@dragszes: Madeline was not Albright, not even half bright. As for the U.S. "killing" 500,000 Iraqi children, if you believe that insane propagandist fantasy, you are her intellectual peer. All Saddam had to do was fullfill his obligations under the terms of surrender he accepted at the end of the Dessert Storm War. It was his refusal to do so which caused those sanctions to go on forever. As for children in Iraq, there was a program to provide food & medicine for oil. The U.N. subverted it.
@dragszes I love when you mentally challenged fuckers reply.The number that was in the live interview is what she responded to.That was her answer.You can belittle her but obviously you follow her doctrine.
@MFchris1 seems he's on a downhill slope. Hopefully people wise up a little and actually look at the facts and the issues instead of the catchy 666 plan. He was the Fed chairman in Kansas and has shown his ignorance there, and he was a head of a department with Aquila, a company that f'd it's workers by getting them to invest in company stock (with their retirement) before destroying the company (it was illegal), and what else? The TARP bailouts, patriot act, the list goes on...*[RON PAUL 2012]*
Don't pretend that Ron Paul is some kind of pure saint. Ron Paul adds earmarks for his district to bills he know will pass then votes against them to appear like he is against government spending.
@buckeyemike81 About the earmarks: well lets just say that You are against the income tax... so when you file your taxes will you skip the credit and deduction part? well you dont and so as Ron Paul wont! earmarks are like those tax credits or deductions.people in his district send money to the D.C and Ron paul puts the earmarks to get the money taken from people in his district back to them. the earmarks are on the request of people of the district he is representing.
@21stCenturyEconomy The problem is that Ron Paul goes around yelling at everyone else for earmarks but he is just as guilty as most other politicians. It's not the earmarks that are the problem (correction: they are a problem just not the most pressing one), it's Ron Paul's dishonest way of going about getting them for his district.
@buckeyemike81 Ron Paul is against income tax and a big government; in other words if the money doesnt go to the D.C then there cant be any earmarks to put on a bill either.Earmarks for 2011 were $130 Billion and thats about %3 of the budget and guess how much ron paul's district is getting? maybe a few billion of that if they get lucky.Ron Paul has never been against earmarks as long as people are sending money to the DC.i think you mixed him up with Rand Paul his son who is against earmarks
w w w .lewrockwell . com / orig7 / phillips5. html
Ron Paul is the probably the most honest man to enter the white house in 30 years. Earmark's are not a problem, you obviously need to do a little more research so you actually know what the F your talking about.
@therotaryrocket If you go around telling everyone you are against federal spending, but then stealthily add earmarks to increase federal spending you are dishonest. Ron Paul is dishonest.
@buckeyemike81 Earmarks don't increase federal spending one dime dumbass. Once again, do some research buckey.... w w w westernfrontamerica com /2010/03/13/ earmarks-add-national-deficit-dime
It sounds like your probably paid by some elites to dispel total misinformation about Ron Paul, but I'm not too worried, the truth will prevail. People will find out. If your not paid by the special interests, then I guess your just incredibly ignorant of the facts, promoting your own demise.
@therotaryrocket You're a Typical Ron Paul conspiracy theorist. Earmarks not only do spend real money (although not a ton in relation to other things), they are used as bribes to push bigger spending through. My point with Ron Paul is that he complains about earmarks that other people add and then adds earmarks to bills then votes against those bills. That's incredibly dishonest.
@buckeyemike81 Why don't you at least see what the man himself has to say about it...
/watch?v=BWTyHbGcUQY
Yes earmarks spend real money, but what's wrong with that? If they took our money, we might as well try and get back as much as possible right? Or are you suggesting you'd rather they just keep your money like they do with most of it? It's sad to see people support their own demise, I can only hope they wake up to the facts of reality for the sake of all mankind.
@buckeyemike81 whats the way forward then? It's obvious that anyone with any real sort of integrity put in the system are immobilized by impoverishment to change anything for the better.
@ParapaDrifter haha, just like someone on the losing side of the argument to start random attacks on anyone who would dare point out that the emperor has no clothes.
Herman Cain isn't a politician, Ron Paul is a politician. Herman Cain isn't yet corrupted the way Ron Paul is, so he is a much better choice.
@IcyScythe Wooo the patriot act... oh no the FBI and CIA can share information, how terrible. Take your talking points back to your cult meetings with your fellow Ron Paul conspiracy nuts.
@buckeyemike81 You make little or no sense at all as you do not even seem to be able to fathom the glaring facts concerning the unpatriotic Patriot Act. It is not a conspiracy but the truth and of course you do not seem able to understand the Bill of Rights so why should we expect you to understand all the problems with the Patriot Act. Use a lot more gray matter and less emotion in your meager arguments, buckeyemike81.
@buckeyemike81 I can understand that comment from a pro 3rd world country socialist dictatorship cheerleading marxist that does nto believe in property or privacy rights (liberty), but not an American who truly understands what the Founding Fathers of this nation fought against (ancient despotism). Please don't call yourself an American.
@feeknocks So you think it is an absolute violation of our founding principals for the CIA to notify the FBI that 2 people who later turned out the be hijacker pilots were connected to terrorist organizations and had entered the country, or for the FBI to tell the CIA that they had caught Zacarias Moussaoui and the suspicion around his taking pilot training courses? This isn't deep constitutional philosophy it's a matter of ending bureaucratic stupidity.
@ParapaDrifter Also, John Boehner has never requested an earmark. The issue is honesty. When Ron Paul adds earmarks to bills he votes against that's dishonest. Boehner doesn't do that. He doesn't rob other districts to enrich his own. Ron Paul's case is worse than most because he complains about everyone else's earmarks while dishonestly getting money for his own district.
@nosferotica1 If you want to make that argument then don't take the money in the first place. It never ends up that you get your money back, some districts end up stealing from others. Ron Paul adds spending to bills that he then votes against. That is dishonest.
@nosferotica1 I do hate them all. Herman Cain is a businessman not a politician. Ron Paul is one of the least honest because he adds spending to bills in secret and then votes against those bills and then to make matters worse complains about other congress reps spending money.
That's not dishonest. Government spending is funding the DEA, DOE, DHS, CIA, etc, not giving the people's tax dollars back to them through something like earmarks.
He is for closing a great number of these agencies. Dishonesty is trying to stop the Patroit act in 2005/2006 and then railroading it through congress in 2010 IE Harry Ried. THAT is dishonesty.
Dishonesty is talking about being small government then EXPANDING it IE Ronald Reagan.
@nosferotica1 The government could choose not to take their money in the first place by lowering taxes, or it could spend the money on paying off our debt instead of new wasteful spending.
I'm just amazed that you, a Ron Paul supporter are defending federal spending. The cult will do anything to protect its leader even if it violates everything the leader preaches.
Cutting taxes without minimizing government leads to borrowing from China. They aren't ending wars, they aren't closing overseas bases, they're not ceasing the practice of occupying foreign nations, and they aren't closing any federal level bureaucracies not to mention every federal employee staffing all those establishments.
Cutting taxes is fucking stupid with all those things considered, and it's not the answer to the problem of big government.
John Boehner not requesting an earkmark has no bearing on the issue especially since he's in bed with the tobacco companies and covered up for Mark Foley when he was doing his thing with those young pages.
Oh, and since you're big on that spending, as Minority Leader he approved like 9.8 trillion for Bush's budgets.
But yeah, you're right. Ron Paul is like, the epitome of evil.
@nosferotica1 Herman Cain is the only non-politician running for president.
Why are you Ron Paul people supporting Ron Paul when he violates what he preaches? Are you promoting Ron Paul or his ideas? Ron Paul is just using you to fly around the country in a private jet, it just came out that he's spent more than any other candidate on charter jets ($1 million).
A private jet that he raises public money for. A private jet not funded by taxpayers money. A private jet so that he can attend rallies and still make it back to DC to vote on legislation and attend committees he sits on. A private jet is necessary, since the airlines won't work around his schedule.
PS: Herman Cain is becoming a politician by running for president. If he becomes president, he will officially be a politician. Good story.
@nosferotica1 OK, so you're paying for him to travel around the country... great...
Why is it that you are willing to defend Ron Paul when he doesn't live up to the ideals he preaches? You are in a cult, and Ron Paul is your cult leader.
I suppose you'd rather he be like other congresspeople and fly in jets funded by the taxpayer, or buck his responsibilities to congress and say "oh my flight doesn't leave until XX:XX?"
He does live up to the ideals he preaches. Better the taxpayers money return to the taxpayers through earmarks than fund illegal wars overseas and all other assets of American Imperialism.
@nosferotica1 Wasted money is wasted money. The wars are about $1 trillion, and we're in debt $15 trillion. The problem is mostly the domestic spending and Ron Paul makes that worse. If you want to say he's better than most, ok I'd probably agree, but he's still a crooked politician.
But answer this. You don't think that someone who adds earmarks to a bill, then votes against that bill, then complains about other congress people wasting money isn't being fundamentally dishonest?
Why Cain? Cause there are a lot of idiots in USA whom will flock to the status quo as long as they continue to receive a piece of the govt pie.
As Yuri Bezmenov said, you can show someone the prove in front of them but they still won't believe it until they get a kick in the rear from a police boot.
Ben Bernanke didn't print money to go to the bahamas...he created electronic transfers and distributed three trillion dollars around like it was candy on halloween while uncountable numbers of Americans are without work.
Ron Paul is a good man and a bit of a curmudgeon, this guy is the reason nobody will take him seriously, Mr. Paul's supporters are his biggest enemy. Name calling,slandering, and general disdain for any other candidate, turns people off. I know Herman Cain through his radio show and he has addressed all these issues to my satisfaction. Don't pick a fight where none is needed, inform yourself and make a decision, Paul or Cain we have got to get rid of the fascist ignoranus in the seat now!
I can say this about Ron Paul supporters. They are hard headed and loyal to the very end, even though he cannot be elected. Go ahead, throw away your vote. I did the same thing when Ross Perot ran years ago.
@teresa6565 Yeah, because I'm sure that voting for Bush Sr. wouldn't have been throwing your vote away. I'm sure your one vote would've changed the whole election. What an illogical argument. The only vote wasted is the vote casted in reluctance.
@teresa6565 the GOP threw away its chance at beating Obama in 2008 by selecting McCain. The GOP will stand behind whomever wins the nomination and Paul is one of the few who will bring in the Independent vote as well as pull Democrats from Obama because of the undeclared war issue. A vote for Paul would not be a loss but a gain for the GOP because the party needs votes outside of its hard-core members.
Ron Paul has been elected to Congress almost a dozen times. Therefore, hes actually VERY electable. Freedom is popular, and people are tired of the status quo and the bloated gov't, so its no wonder RP is at the front of the presidential race along with libertarian ideas.
Herman Cain took a dismissive view of the “Occupy Wall Street” protesters converging in downtown New York.“Don't blame the big banks,” he said. “If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself.”
I guess he has no answer for created more jobs...typical stupid republican...
to be fair, supporting Romney in 2008 would have likely prevented an Obama Presidency. Great post though. Cain is trying to delay giving specifics on "secondary" issues for as long as possible. TomWoods rocks!
I would vote for Paul but he is unelectable. The reasons he is uneletable are that the liberal left HATES him. The media does everything to destroy him because they know he is right on the economy. Even Fox News would not support him, though they might support a more mainstream candidate against Obama. Paul is controversial on drugs and defense, and out of step with most people on those issues and his personality comes off as irritable and whining. I would vote for him but I dont see him winning
@frost122585 Then your job is to educate the American people and not rely on the media. Don't vote for who is electable but elect the one who you agree with.
@CorrespondingReality People have a right to vote for whoever they want for whatever reasons they want. There is no thought police yet I hope. I agree with your point but I am voting for who I think would make for the overal best candidate for a host of reasons. Firstly he is more electable to me than Paul, I think it is great for liberals and especially liberal blacks to see such a successful black man running for the RNC on a somewhat conservative platform too.
@frost122585 It is just as racist to vote for someone because they are black as it is racist to not vote for someone because they are black. I am also trying to tell you electability follows the rest of the voting points. If all of the other voting points are good then electability will follow.
Cain thought Rmoney was better than McCain. Big deal. So did i. I figured they would be about the same as far as being fake or moderate conservatives, but I liked Romney's personality better. Simple as that. I say "Yes We Cain" 2012.
Herman has a plan! Tells us how he wants to achieve these goals! Obama never did that. His plan will take refining because he doesn't even have access to all the kinds of information that the president has! It would only make him do his job better! His best interest is truly in the American people. Unlike our current president.
Herman has hurdle to overcome just like all the people running. He's a strong man that at least has answers to questions with our economy.
Thanks for the information Tom. A lot of people don't like Ron Paul's foreign policy though which is why he won't become the nominee.
No nominee is perfect for everyone in this country. Just like you can't please everyone when when running a business. However, if you please the majority of people in this country or with your business you will be successful.
This country elected Obama because they know we needed change. They knew little about his plans until after he was elected.
Howabout; Herman Cain: Austerity for You, Ritz Carlton for Me
The GOP presidential hopeful's campaign is spending more than it's raising—and a lot of that money is being spent on planes, chauffeurs, and five-star hotels.
He can't manage the finances of his own little campaign!
Howabout; Herman "Criminal" Cain would 'ENRON' Americans --
Google it
As chair of the compensation committee, Cain also saw fit to dole out $30 million in bonuses, not including stock options, to the top five execs at Aquila in 2002, with the company's stock plummeting. A month after the Kansas City Star reported on the hefty bonuses in July 2002, the company laid off 500 employees, and the losses to employees holding company stock had reached hundreds of millions of dollars."
Wow, very impressive why doesn't cnn or fox tell you any of this important stuff? This guy knows his stuff. They are all establishment status quo candidates except Ron Paul. The voters just need to see that.
Romney looked like a cheap preacher in wolfs clothes until they did a make over.., Perry looks like the Antichrist, Newt is looking to have another extramarital affair (most likely during an incredibly important moment in history) and stick another contract......up the public's backside, & Ron Paul is being ignored as usual. Yep, were're $crewed......as usual......
Romney looked like a cheap preacher in wolfs clothes until they did a make over.., Perry looks like the Antichrist, Newt is looking to have another extramarital affair (most likely during an incredibly important moment in history) and stick another contract......up the public's backside, & Ron Paul is being ignored as usual. Yep, were're screwed......as usual......
TARP was good policy but bad politics! The reason TARP was put into effect was because if they would have simply let the entire financial system crash the only people that would have gotten hurt would have been average Americans! Fat cats on Wall Street already rigged the system so their money is protected! Just ask yourself this question....is the ex-CEO of Bear Stearns living under a bridge right now?
TARP was good policy but bad politics! The reason TARP was put into effect was because if they would have simply let the entire financial system crash the only people that would have gotten hurt would have been average Americans! Fat cats on Wall Street already rigged the system so their money is protected! Just ask yourself this question....is the ex-CEO of Bear Stearns living under a bridge right now?
The REAL trouble with Herman Cain, the former Kansas City Federal Reserve Chair is that he's just another NWO.WallSt.Banksters' HouseNegro, just like oBUSHma, you know, another ASTROTURF "grassroots" candidate?
The ONLY grassroots candidate in America IS Dr. Ron Paul. PERIOD.
Cain now LIES on campaign trail that he'"NEVER worked for govt." It's either admit that he was KC.Fed.Res.Chair, or expose that Fed.Res. is as "federal" as FedEx to the sheeple.
Why are they supporting Herman Cain? You have to ask? He's black, that's why. As to Ron Paul... he killed his chance of getting elected when he recently said that putting up a wall / fence on the border is a bad idea because it would keep American's in. OK, that's just off-the-charts kooky. What Paul was really saying is that he is 100% for open-borders immigration.
@RSnelli yea, and I heard the votes in the FL straw poll cost $175 bucks each, and each person could vote up to 10 times. That kind misconstrues the votes wouldn't you think? That'd be $1750 for each person, something the grassroots Ron Paul supporters might have a little trouble competing with against wealthy corporate theives. Thanks Tom Woods for spreading the message.
Since the plastic Insider Establishment puke Perry can't even be swallowed by the usual gullible Reich Wing, the ruling elite now provides the sheeple with a more palatable plastic Insider. They have an endless supply too, if old Herman fails, there will be another one waiting in the wings. They will do everything including trotting out Jeb Bush(who they want to save for 2016 or later) if necessary. Anything to stop Ron Paul whom they despise and greatly fear.
@DRNevans Ron Paul is right on alot of things, but I believe he is weak on many things including foreign policy. I like how he opposes socialized healthcare and is for getting rid such programs that we already have. I believe that among other steps would make that sector have to start competing for business.
herman who?
getatmegamer 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
This will win us Iowa!!!
Go to SUPERVOTERBOMB [dot] com
For $1.20/ea we can mail a "For Liberty Re-cut" DVD and a Super Brochure to 1 Republican Supervoter, accompanied by a letter from New York Times' best-selling author Thomas E. Woods.
SchleckBros 3 months ago in playlist More videos from TomWoodsTV
I'd like to know how Cain got that job as the head of the regional Fed. Is he especially good at adding a string of zeroes after ones, or something? Was it his ambition he pursued, or was it handed to him? If handed to him, by whom?
MillionthUsername 3 months ago
@MillionthUsername Keep going on, you are on the right path ;)
vincentca2004 3 months ago
@MillionthUsername ... Herman Cain was appointed to head the Fed Regional office by a Republican President. Probably Bush's father, who also gave us Clarence Thomas.
TheTruthNow000 3 months ago
51 Cainsians disliked this video.
rambone5 3 months ago
@rambone5 Keynesian*
ThatAdelaideGuy 3 months ago
The Patriot Act is totally unconstitutional-----how many times do we need to state this obvious and glaring fact. There is literally no area of it's provisions that are Constitutional. Thank you Tom Woods and elect Ron Paul for President in 2012. His actions speak even more clearly than his words as he is a true American Patriot.
davidjsanchez1 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Perhaps you should read what the patriot act entails, then you might now be so condecending in your remarkes.
MrJtaber9259 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 The patriot act is more than just sharing information. It also allows them to hold you indefinitely without counsel, or sneak and peak which allows them to secretly search your home without warrant or even letting you know they did it. There is so much more that it allows the government to do and all they have to do is say you "could" be a threat to national security. It is a complete and utter violation of your constitutional rights, and if your ok with that then that is sad.
MrJtaber9259 4 months ago
@MrJtaber9259 When we lose a city to a nuclear attack you will find out what a real police state is. The Patriot Act is needed to fix stupidity caused by unelected bureaucrats (Jamie Gorelick). There's no reason that the CIA and FBI shouldn't communicate with each other. Sometimes a sneak and peek (which does need a FISA warrant) is necessary to not tip off the criminals about an investigation.
buckeyemike81 3 months ago
@buckeyemike81 (1)What specific part of the U.S. Constitution authorizes a Patriot's Act? If you don't support the Constitution you are no conservative and if you believe in warrentless searches you do not believe in our constitution(2)We are more likely to attract the bad guys to our shores if we continue meddling in the affairs of other nations(3)We will better protect ourselves if we up our overseas intelligence gathering & build a swiss style national defense(without a draft of course).
sleedolfine15 3 months ago
@sleedolfine15 1)Article 2 Section 2, these aren't criminals, this is a war, the president manages the defense. George Washington was successful in the revolution mostly because of his intelligence network. 2) Fighting terrorism doesn't cause terrorism 3)Why bother having increased intelligence services if laws put in place by the Clinton administration bind their hands to make them useless? The Patriot Act allows communication of various intelligence agencies.
buckeyemike81 3 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Article 2 Section 2 doesn't give the president the authority to over rule the 4th amendment which the Act does when it lowers standards for wire tapping & when it allows the FBI the authority to search private records without a court order,etc. When Timothy McVeigh committed the 2nd worst terrorist act in U.S. history I don't remember it being called an act of war. Interferring in another nation's affairs,propping up dictators,etc, does cause terrorism. Remember the Shah of Iran?
sleedolfine15 3 months ago
@sleedolfine15 The FBI is not granted that power, they need a FISA warrant. This practice was already in place for drug dealers and mobsters of not notifying them when a search (with warrant) took place. McVeigh thought his actions were an act of war even if you don't think of it that way, German saboteurs caught in WWII on the east coast were ruled to be engaged in warfare. If we would have defended the Shah we'd be in a much safer world, we hung him out to dry like we just did with Mubarak.
buckeyemike81 3 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Under FISA a small number of cases with a foreign connection, were sent to a secret court to grant search warrents without the usual requirement for probable cause. Under the Patriot's Act what had been a rare,albeit unconstitutional exception to the 4th amendment became frequently used. Germany was a nation--not a group, with whom we had a declared war. McVeigh was tried in court,as were Mafia crooks. Iran is a problem because of our 1953 coup done for iranian oil.
sleedolfine15 3 months ago
@sleedolfine15 Ok so you agree that you are a liar and warrants are required, and you knew that all along, but you now want to change your argument that the requirements for those warrants are insufficient? What difference does it make if it's a UN recognized nation-state or an organized group with the same goal of waging war on Americans? This is a ridiculous distinction that is not in the constitution, it doesn't say we can only defend ourselves from nation-states.
buckeyemike81 3 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Liar,huh? Well,I've tried to be civil to you even though I believe that people like you are what is destroying this great country. But,you are clearly no gentleman or lady,as the case my be,and although I do have an answer to your rather ridiculous point of view,engaging you is clearly a waste since I choose not to roll around in the mud with you. I know that infantile types like you need the last word,so go to it,but remember I will not be reading your comments.
sleedolfine15 3 months ago
@sleedolfine15 You claimed that the FBI can do warrantless searches, but when I mentioned the FISA warrants you clearly knew exactly what I was talking about. So you were intentionally saying something you knew to be untrue. I'll consult Webster, but I believe the English word to describe someone who does that is "liar."
buckeyemike81 3 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
RON PAUL 2012!
MITech2612097 4 months ago
I think America is run by the "Hatfields & Mcoys"!!
Ron Paul 2012 !
bermudaguy1 4 months ago 2
but he is better than barack! period!
stazandjeve 4 months ago
Terryweb - You do or you'd be on another video/channel. If people listened to Tom Woods more (and people like him) we'd not be in the mess we're in. GTFO.
Itugen88 4 months ago
Lol Romney is the plastic man. What is Tom Woods made of? Who gives a flying fuck about what Tom Woods has to say?
terryweb 4 months ago
woods for president
DRisLegend200919 4 months ago
Tom I appreciate your video. As to answers you feel that the candidates are not clear on, run for office and we will see how clear you will answer on gray areas. As for Ron Paul, he can talk the talk always stopping short of winning. I feel he can walk the walk to the bank with his campaign money with no problem. Pontification with out the courage to follow through? But he can follow his campaign money to the bank. Always stopping short of winning.
Best Always - Ben
FranklinParkIL 4 months ago
All eyes are on NWO Puppet#8173 from MN?
shyeah, eright
diogeneslaertius666 4 months ago
Tom Woods, will you be my Treasury Secretary?
diogeneslaertius666 4 months ago
There is certainly much to admire in Herman Cain, but Thomas Woods does bring up some rather damnable evidence that he might be unsuitable for the Republican nominee.
The most serious, in my opinion, is his support for the TARP bailouts, suggesting that Cain is another Big Gov't/Big Business crony, which is precisely what this nation does not need.
slaterms11 4 months ago 8
I can see how HC might help RP .
OnTheLambda 4 months ago
999 economics? How obvious do you have to be with the 666 reference?
teched246 4 months ago
Herman is the Neocon Puppet Candidate
ryanshaunkelly 4 months ago
Ron Paul 2012. Local government, local education, no foreign wars, no foreign banking cartel federal reserve.
pigeonpsycho 4 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Vote Ron Paul!
judithnarz 4 months ago
hes a horrible black cunt simple.
mrme19801 4 months ago
this vide☼
is headlined at
davidicke . com/headlines/54906
Presidential Hopeful Herman Cain Makes Boy Bush Look Like The Brain Of America
vastell 4 months ago
Ron Paul is the Tea Party favorite.
Nobody is calling Herman Cain a "Tea Party favorite." He supported the bailouts, was on the Federal Reserve and supports adding another tax. He is all for big government, which is 100% against the Tea Party's goals.
sleepeeg3 4 months ago
You are a fine man Tom. I always love your logical explanations and incite. Keep up the good work. Much love to you.
dmlockwood 4 months ago
TOM good stuff & why wouldn't you run for some office to make a difference!! Won't be long before he will be exposed for his soulstunting antics when he was young...FACT!!! Skeletons really hurt when someone opens the closet...FACT!!
inacarjam 4 months ago
I love the way tom woods explains his views. So funny.
rgiblin6 4 months ago
joking: i want to change my first do Goldman to see if I can become the 1% or not.
roberttzeng1 4 months ago
Hey Floridians... If Herman Cain wins, our sales tax jumps from 7% to 16% overnight under his 999 plan. This is suicide.
TVCatholic 4 months ago
Pizza man for President ? LOOOOOL
2598129 4 months ago
Great job Tom!
stephani1972 4 months ago 7
Caines
FranklinJones45 4 months ago
You can tell just how out of touch the GOP is by the candidates they have chosen to represent the party. I say "they" have chosen because they would love to exclude Ron Paul, ironically the only "Republican" with a real vision to change this nightmare the government has become.
pretorious700 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
all the candidates suck, except for the one that will probably have no chance of winning, Gary Johnson.
manfries 5 months ago
"says whatever the boobs want him to say" lmao priceless
babbx11 5 months ago
haha mitt romney plastic man
mikeroweRules12 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dan Phillips of the 'Conservative Heritage Times' wrote a really good article "Herman Cain Does Not Get The Federal Reserve Issue" google it and read it.
ToTink 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
mpeach this puppet O B O M B M A , leave the White House O B O M B M A, just GTFO don't let the door hit your ass on the way out. Take down the federal reserve. It is not federal! and has no reserve! They want you to focus on Wall Street. Keep the pressure up there also, but really hit out at the feds If you doubt about what is happening watch this.
Mind blowing speech Robert Welch 1958
Go Ron Go
johnnycmajor 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Tom Woods kicking knowledge like always
RON PAUL 2012 END THE FED
razz187 5 months ago
@buckeyemike81 please search RON PAUL ON EARmarks on youtube
21stCenturyEconomy 5 months ago
Romney was certainly preferable to...mmmm...McCain.
As for the Patriot Act, it is hardly more onerous then old war measures. We are at war w/ radical Islam. You do realize it.
Wrong Paul is a lunatic.
VictorLepanto 5 months ago
@VictorLepanto wait till the feds ramsack your house and phone without you even knowing it, without any warrant, maybe that's what it has to come to for people to wake up to the fact that our freedom is being stolen...not to protect us, but to further control us. They could get warrants during war, war is just an excuse, part of the fear mongering. There is a reason the constitution and bill of rights are the law of the land, now we just need to actually follow it...and Ron Paul knows it best.
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
@therotaryrocket: Wait until some jihadi explodes himself on an airplane you're flying in. What does it take for blame America 1st types like you & Wrong Paul to wake & face the fact we are at war w/ a genocidal enemy, who thinks God has commanded him to expterminate everyone who isn't a Moslem?
VictorLepanto 5 months ago
@VictorLepanto Maybe you oughtta do a little more research before you come to such drastic conclusions that some news media told you to think. According to Robert Pape at Chicago? University, whom has studied every recorded suicide bombing incident, they are 98% motivated by OCCUPATION. That means our American military bases and troops patrolling their streets killing and oppressing their people, is the reason they attack. Even Micheal Scheur, the head of Bin Laden CIA unit has said it.........
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
@therotaryrocket Wouldn't you be more inclined to trust our own CIA and other highly educated figures rather than some political rhetoric and media directed at robbing us blind, and using war as an excuse to make massive profits for their buddies? Besides it's common sense, but I guess that's what's really missing nowadays. Watch these vids for a little insight
/watch?v=XKfuS6gfxPY&feature=player_embedded
/watch?v=QhmF7sNlraU&feature=player_embedded
Accept the truth by the facts.
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
@therotaryrocket: So you're a member of the Hate America, Blame America Committe. Michael Scheur is little better then a Nazi w/ his reflexive always blame Israel policy. I would have hoped the world would have learned its lesson w/ Chamberlain's betrayal of Czechoslovakia to Nazi tyranny. I guess some people are too stupid to ever learn. Or else they actually prefer Nazis.
VictorLepanto 4 months ago
@VictorLepanto Actually I love America, but I guess I really don't like our corrupt, taken over government. That's why I advocate Ron Paul. He actually wants to restore America to the great country it once was. Return us to the confines of the great Constitution and attitudes of the founding fathers whom really did love freedom. Have you ever even read the Declaration of Independence or Constitution? Your hate comments are irrational and obviously uneducated. Your comparison is irrelevant.......
therotaryrocket 4 months ago
@therotaryrocket ..Chamberlain in attempt to avoid direct confrontation with Hitler, decided to allow the Munich Agreement to avoid war. Besides the 'terrorists' are hardly Nazi's, the real Nazi's would be more like those that invade and destroy other countries on their grounds with no real threat (merely a group of people to hate, a cover for their profiteering and global power agenda). "When the subconscious mind doesn’t find any solution to a certain problem it uses hatred as a final resort."
therotaryrocket 4 months ago
@therotaryrocket: fortunately our Founders were utterly unlike Wrong Paul & they left us a constitution that in no wise resembles his insane suicidal libertarian notions.
I would demand from you that you answer a few questions that are necessary to this issue: Are we at war w/ Al Qaeda & other similar forms of radical Islam, like in Iran. Are they a mortal threat to us & much of the rest or humanity as well? If we are @ war then war powers apply.
VictorLepanto 4 months ago
@VictorLepanto No one in Washington is more inline with the ideals and actions the founders represented than Dr. Paul. It's obvious though, that if you don't know that, your speaking out of your a**, because the truth is in the facts and history. Typical of a tyrannical gov't supporter that you'd demand something from me, words of force, words that imply no freedom. Are we at war? Technically NO, we have not declared war. Wars must be declared thru congress, whom represents the people.......
therotaryrocket 4 months ago
@therotaryrocket ........And considering the fact that well over half of Americans disprove of our current wars, if we did uphold the rule of law as we should, then no we wouldn't be involved. In fact, we would've never pissed them off because following the advice of the founders and the constitution, we would've never been dealing in their internal affairs. Why is it so hard to accept the truth? War is the most horrible thing to ever exist anyways.
therotaryrocket 4 months ago
@therotaryrocket: Wrong Paul knows about as much about our Founders as a pig knows about Sunday. It is all too obvious that Wrong Paul is a racist, an antisemite & an America hater. Anyone who would say as he did that the people on 9/11 somehow deserved to die for America's sins is a psychotic bastard. I'd like him to specify what sins America committed which somehow 'PROVOKED" that action. But I know what he means, he means helping the "Zionist Entity."
VictorLepanto 4 months ago
@VictorLepanto he'san anti semite but he's "helping the zionist entity" If you come on youtube to provoke or to be an adgitator atleast make sense.As for what the US gov did.When madeline albright was asked if the sanctions on iraq were worth the lives of 500000 iraqi children she said yes.So you tell me .
dragszes 4 months ago
@dragszes: Madeline was not Albright, not even half bright. As for the U.S. "killing" 500,000 Iraqi children, if you believe that insane propagandist fantasy, you are her intellectual peer. All Saddam had to do was fullfill his obligations under the terms of surrender he accepted at the end of the Dessert Storm War. It was his refusal to do so which caused those sanctions to go on forever. As for children in Iraq, there was a program to provide food & medicine for oil. The U.N. subverted it.
VictorLepanto 4 months ago
@dragszes I love when you mentally challenged fuckers reply.The number that was in the live interview is what she responded to.That was her answer.You can belittle her but obviously you follow her doctrine.
dragszes 4 months ago
i honestly dont understand the 'buzz' around herman cain.
MFchris1 5 months ago
@MFchris1 seems he's on a downhill slope. Hopefully people wise up a little and actually look at the facts and the issues instead of the catchy 666 plan. He was the Fed chairman in Kansas and has shown his ignorance there, and he was a head of a department with Aquila, a company that f'd it's workers by getting them to invest in company stock (with their retirement) before destroying the company (it was illegal), and what else? The TARP bailouts, patriot act, the list goes on...*[RON PAUL 2012]*
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
correction: thats a huge problem.
MFchris1 5 months ago
Don't pretend that Ron Paul is some kind of pure saint. Ron Paul adds earmarks for his district to bills he know will pass then votes against them to appear like he is against government spending.
buckeyemike81 5 months ago
@buckeyemike81 About the earmarks: well lets just say that You are against the income tax... so when you file your taxes will you skip the credit and deduction part? well you dont and so as Ron Paul wont! earmarks are like those tax credits or deductions.people in his district send money to the D.C and Ron paul puts the earmarks to get the money taken from people in his district back to them. the earmarks are on the request of people of the district he is representing.
21stCenturyEconomy 5 months ago
@21stCenturyEconomy The problem is that Ron Paul goes around yelling at everyone else for earmarks but he is just as guilty as most other politicians. It's not the earmarks that are the problem (correction: they are a problem just not the most pressing one), it's Ron Paul's dishonest way of going about getting them for his district.
buckeyemike81 5 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Ron Paul is against income tax and a big government; in other words if the money doesnt go to the D.C then there cant be any earmarks to put on a bill either.Earmarks for 2011 were $130 Billion and thats about %3 of the budget and guess how much ron paul's district is getting? maybe a few billion of that if they get lucky.Ron Paul has never been against earmarks as long as people are sending money to the DC.i think you mixed him up with Rand Paul his son who is against earmarks
21stCenturyEconomy 5 months ago
@buckeyemike81 this time youtube "rand paul on ear marks" :P
21stCenturyEconomy 5 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Why don't you educate yourself a little
w w w .lewrockwell . com / orig7 / phillips5. html
Ron Paul is the probably the most honest man to enter the white house in 30 years. Earmark's are not a problem, you obviously need to do a little more research so you actually know what the F your talking about.
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
@therotaryrocket If you go around telling everyone you are against federal spending, but then stealthily add earmarks to increase federal spending you are dishonest. Ron Paul is dishonest.
buckeyemike81 5 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Earmarks don't increase federal spending one dime dumbass. Once again, do some research buckey.... w w w westernfrontamerica com /2010/03/13/ earmarks-add-national-deficit-dime
It sounds like your probably paid by some elites to dispel total misinformation about Ron Paul, but I'm not too worried, the truth will prevail. People will find out. If your not paid by the special interests, then I guess your just incredibly ignorant of the facts, promoting your own demise.
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
@therotaryrocket You're a Typical Ron Paul conspiracy theorist. Earmarks not only do spend real money (although not a ton in relation to other things), they are used as bribes to push bigger spending through. My point with Ron Paul is that he complains about earmarks that other people add and then adds earmarks to bills then votes against those bills. That's incredibly dishonest.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Why don't you at least see what the man himself has to say about it...
/watch?v=BWTyHbGcUQY
Yes earmarks spend real money, but what's wrong with that? If they took our money, we might as well try and get back as much as possible right? Or are you suggesting you'd rather they just keep your money like they do with most of it? It's sad to see people support their own demise, I can only hope they wake up to the facts of reality for the sake of all mankind.
therotaryrocket 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 whats the way forward then? It's obvious that anyone with any real sort of integrity put in the system are immobilized by impoverishment to change anything for the better.
Whats your solution dickhead? What would you do?
ParapaDrifter 4 months ago
@ParapaDrifter haha, just like someone on the losing side of the argument to start random attacks on anyone who would dare point out that the emperor has no clothes.
Herman Cain isn't a politician, Ron Paul is a politician. Herman Cain isn't yet corrupted the way Ron Paul is, so he is a much better choice.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 he supports the patriot act that's reason enough to not vote for him.
IcyScythe 4 months ago
@IcyScythe Wooo the patriot act... oh no the FBI and CIA can share information, how terrible. Take your talking points back to your cult meetings with your fellow Ron Paul conspiracy nuts.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 You make little or no sense at all as you do not even seem to be able to fathom the glaring facts concerning the unpatriotic Patriot Act. It is not a conspiracy but the truth and of course you do not seem able to understand the Bill of Rights so why should we expect you to understand all the problems with the Patriot Act. Use a lot more gray matter and less emotion in your meager arguments, buckeyemike81.
davidjsanchez1 4 months ago
@davidjsanchez1 So you agree with Jamie Gorelick that there should be a communication wall between the FBI and CIA?
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 I can understand that comment from a pro 3rd world country socialist dictatorship cheerleading marxist that does nto believe in property or privacy rights (liberty), but not an American who truly understands what the Founding Fathers of this nation fought against (ancient despotism). Please don't call yourself an American.
feeknocks 3 months ago
@feeknocks So you think it is an absolute violation of our founding principals for the CIA to notify the FBI that 2 people who later turned out the be hijacker pilots were connected to terrorist organizations and had entered the country, or for the FBI to tell the CIA that they had caught Zacarias Moussaoui and the suspicion around his taking pilot training courses? This isn't deep constitutional philosophy it's a matter of ending bureaucratic stupidity.
buckeyemike81 3 months ago
@ParapaDrifter Also, John Boehner has never requested an earmark. The issue is honesty. When Ron Paul adds earmarks to bills he votes against that's dishonest. Boehner doesn't do that. He doesn't rob other districts to enrich his own. Ron Paul's case is worse than most because he complains about everyone else's earmarks while dishonestly getting money for his own district.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 It's their money. They shouldn't have their money back?
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@nosferotica1 If you want to make that argument then don't take the money in the first place. It never ends up that you get your money back, some districts end up stealing from others. Ron Paul adds spending to bills that he then votes against. That is dishonest.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
If your beef is with dishonest congressmen, then you must hate them all. If you want those that are the most honest, then you will vote for Ron Paul.
nosferotica1 4 months ago 16
@nosferotica1 I do hate them all. Herman Cain is a businessman not a politician. Ron Paul is one of the least honest because he adds spending to bills in secret and then votes against those bills and then to make matters worse complains about other congress reps spending money.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
That's not dishonest. Government spending is funding the DEA, DOE, DHS, CIA, etc, not giving the people's tax dollars back to them through something like earmarks.
He is for closing a great number of these agencies. Dishonesty is trying to stop the Patroit act in 2005/2006 and then railroading it through congress in 2010 IE Harry Ried. THAT is dishonesty.
Dishonesty is talking about being small government then EXPANDING it IE Ronald Reagan.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81 Don't take the money in the first place? The Government took it from them, they shouldn't have it back?
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@nosferotica1 The government could choose not to take their money in the first place by lowering taxes, or it could spend the money on paying off our debt instead of new wasteful spending.
I'm just amazed that you, a Ron Paul supporter are defending federal spending. The cult will do anything to protect its leader even if it violates everything the leader preaches.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
Cutting taxes without minimizing government leads to borrowing from China. They aren't ending wars, they aren't closing overseas bases, they're not ceasing the practice of occupying foreign nations, and they aren't closing any federal level bureaucracies not to mention every federal employee staffing all those establishments.
Cutting taxes is fucking stupid with all those things considered, and it's not the answer to the problem of big government.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
John Boehner not requesting an earkmark has no bearing on the issue especially since he's in bed with the tobacco companies and covered up for Mark Foley when he was doing his thing with those young pages.
Oh, and since you're big on that spending, as Minority Leader he approved like 9.8 trillion for Bush's budgets.
But yeah, you're right. Ron Paul is like, the epitome of evil.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@nosferotica1 I covered up Foley? WTF does that have to do with anything? Foley is a jackass politician like the rest.
You can trash all the politicians you want, they're all crooks just like Ron Paul. Herman Cain is a businessman not a politician.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
Yeah, because you're John fucking Boehner.
PS: He's not the only businessman on Capitol Hill... So... That point is moot.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@nosferotica1 Herman Cain is the only non-politician running for president.
Why are you Ron Paul people supporting Ron Paul when he violates what he preaches? Are you promoting Ron Paul or his ideas? Ron Paul is just using you to fly around the country in a private jet, it just came out that he's spent more than any other candidate on charter jets ($1 million).
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
A private jet that he raises public money for. A private jet not funded by taxpayers money. A private jet so that he can attend rallies and still make it back to DC to vote on legislation and attend committees he sits on. A private jet is necessary, since the airlines won't work around his schedule.
PS: Herman Cain is becoming a politician by running for president. If he becomes president, he will officially be a politician. Good story.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@nosferotica1 OK, so you're paying for him to travel around the country... great...
Why is it that you are willing to defend Ron Paul when he doesn't live up to the ideals he preaches? You are in a cult, and Ron Paul is your cult leader.
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
I suppose you'd rather he be like other congresspeople and fly in jets funded by the taxpayer, or buck his responsibilities to congress and say "oh my flight doesn't leave until XX:XX?"
He does live up to the ideals he preaches. Better the taxpayers money return to the taxpayers through earmarks than fund illegal wars overseas and all other assets of American Imperialism.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
@nosferotica1 Wasted money is wasted money. The wars are about $1 trillion, and we're in debt $15 trillion. The problem is mostly the domestic spending and Ron Paul makes that worse. If you want to say he's better than most, ok I'd probably agree, but he's still a crooked politician.
But answer this. You don't think that someone who adds earmarks to a bill, then votes against that bill, then complains about other congress people wasting money isn't being fundamentally dishonest?
buckeyemike81 4 months ago
@buckeyemike81
Not sure what it matters when you're usually the only one that gives a shit.
nosferotica1 4 months ago
RON PAUL!
shiningbeans 5 months ago 7
NO WE CAIN'T...
StandUpComedyTV 5 months ago
Why Cain? Cause there are a lot of idiots in USA whom will flock to the status quo as long as they continue to receive a piece of the govt pie.
As Yuri Bezmenov said, you can show someone the prove in front of them but they still won't believe it until they get a kick in the rear from a police boot.
MrSeriouslynot 5 months ago
999 is just 666 upside down. this guy Cain is working for the occult.
jakenichols 5 months ago
@teresa6565
I vote on principle. This isn't the lottery, stop looking for the 'winning ticket'.
wutupjosh 5 months ago
Ben Bernanke didn't print money to go to the bahamas...he created electronic transfers and distributed three trillion dollars around like it was candy on halloween while uncountable numbers of Americans are without work.
TheUselessCritic 5 months ago
Ron Paul is a good man and a bit of a curmudgeon, this guy is the reason nobody will take him seriously, Mr. Paul's supporters are his biggest enemy. Name calling,slandering, and general disdain for any other candidate, turns people off. I know Herman Cain through his radio show and he has addressed all these issues to my satisfaction. Don't pick a fight where none is needed, inform yourself and make a decision, Paul or Cain we have got to get rid of the fascist ignoranus in the seat now!
catmcross1 5 months ago
I can say this about Ron Paul supporters. They are hard headed and loyal to the very end, even though he cannot be elected. Go ahead, throw away your vote. I did the same thing when Ross Perot ran years ago.
teresa6565 5 months ago
@teresa6565 Yeah, because I'm sure that voting for Bush Sr. wouldn't have been throwing your vote away. I'm sure your one vote would've changed the whole election. What an illogical argument. The only vote wasted is the vote casted in reluctance.
platinumshadow03 5 months ago
@teresa6565 the GOP threw away its chance at beating Obama in 2008 by selecting McCain. The GOP will stand behind whomever wins the nomination and Paul is one of the few who will bring in the Independent vote as well as pull Democrats from Obama because of the undeclared war issue. A vote for Paul would not be a loss but a gain for the GOP because the party needs votes outside of its hard-core members.
GAPeachWoman 5 months ago
Ron Paul has been elected to Congress almost a dozen times. Therefore, hes actually VERY electable. Freedom is popular, and people are tired of the status quo and the bloated gov't, so its no wonder RP is at the front of the presidential race along with libertarian ideas.
kaldethyst 5 months ago 13
Youtube this:
WXIX 19 (CIN) Ben Swann on Anwar Al-Awlaki and the Constitution
Vote4RonPaulLiberty 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Herman Cain took a dismissive view of the “Occupy Wall Street” protesters converging in downtown New York.“Don't blame the big banks,” he said. “If you don't have a job and you're not rich, blame yourself.”
I guess he has no answer for created more jobs...typical stupid republican...
freein2339 5 months ago
to be fair, supporting Romney in 2008 would have likely prevented an Obama Presidency. Great post though. Cain is trying to delay giving specifics on "secondary" issues for as long as possible. TomWoods rocks!
DCUPtoejuice 5 months ago
I would vote for Paul but he is unelectable. The reasons he is uneletable are that the liberal left HATES him. The media does everything to destroy him because they know he is right on the economy. Even Fox News would not support him, though they might support a more mainstream candidate against Obama. Paul is controversial on drugs and defense, and out of step with most people on those issues and his personality comes off as irritable and whining. I would vote for him but I dont see him winning
frost122585 5 months ago
@frost122585 Then your job is to educate the American people and not rely on the media. Don't vote for who is electable but elect the one who you agree with.
CorrespondingReality 5 months ago
@CorrespondingReality People have a right to vote for whoever they want for whatever reasons they want. There is no thought police yet I hope. I agree with your point but I am voting for who I think would make for the overal best candidate for a host of reasons. Firstly he is more electable to me than Paul, I think it is great for liberals and especially liberal blacks to see such a successful black man running for the RNC on a somewhat conservative platform too.
frost122585 5 months ago
@frost122585 It is just as racist to vote for someone because they are black as it is racist to not vote for someone because they are black. I am also trying to tell you electability follows the rest of the voting points. If all of the other voting points are good then electability will follow.
CorrespondingReality 4 months ago
Cain thought Rmoney was better than McCain. Big deal. So did i. I figured they would be about the same as far as being fake or moderate conservatives, but I liked Romney's personality better. Simple as that. I say "Yes We Cain" 2012.
frost122585 5 months ago
Herman Cain for President.
erininokeechobee 5 months ago
Herman has a plan! Tells us how he wants to achieve these goals! Obama never did that. His plan will take refining because he doesn't even have access to all the kinds of information that the president has! It would only make him do his job better! His best interest is truly in the American people. Unlike our current president.
Herman has hurdle to overcome just like all the people running. He's a strong man that at least has answers to questions with our economy.
Keithbull65 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Thanks for the information Tom. A lot of people don't like Ron Paul's foreign policy though which is why he won't become the nominee.
No nominee is perfect for everyone in this country. Just like you can't please everyone when when running a business. However, if you please the
majority of people in this country or with your business you will be successful.
This country elected Obama because they know we needed change. They knew little about his plans until after he was elected.
Keithbull65 5 months ago
Thanks for the information Tom. A lot of people don't like Ron Paul's foreign policy though which is why he won't become the nominee.
No nominee is perfect for everyone in this country. Just like you can't please everyone when when running a business. However, if you please the majority of people in this country or with your business you will be successful.
This country elected Obama because they know we needed change. They knew little about his plans until after he was elected.
Keithbull65 5 months ago
Howabout; Herman Cain: Austerity for You, Ritz Carlton for Me
The GOP presidential hopeful's campaign is spending more than it's raising—and a lot of that money is being spent on planes, chauffeurs, and five-star hotels.
He can't manage the finances of his own little campaign!
Google it
tradingbarracuda 5 months ago
Howabout; Herman "Criminal" Cain would 'ENRON' Americans --
Google it
As chair of the compensation committee, Cain also saw fit to dole out $30 million in bonuses, not including stock options, to the top five execs at Aquila in 2002, with the company's stock plummeting. A month after the Kansas City Star reported on the hefty bonuses in July 2002, the company laid off 500 employees, and the losses to employees holding company stock had reached hundreds of millions of dollars."
tradingbarracuda 5 months ago
love the Videos Tom Keep it Going!!! We Support You!! And Ron Paul!
defkon99 5 months ago
Tom....you are doing a great job brother! Keep spreading the truth.
bobbydavis57 5 months ago
Wow, very impressive why doesn't cnn or fox tell you any of this important stuff? This guy knows his stuff. They are all establishment status quo candidates except Ron Paul. The voters just need to see that.
Shaunt1 5 months ago 2
This has been flagged as spam show
Romney looked like a cheap preacher in wolfs clothes until they did a make over.., Perry looks like the Antichrist, Newt is looking to have another extramarital affair (most likely during an incredibly important moment in history) and stick another contract......up the public's backside, & Ron Paul is being ignored as usual. Yep, were're $crewed......as usual......
automan1223 5 months ago
Romney looked like a cheap preacher in wolfs clothes until they did a make over.., Perry looks like the Antichrist, Newt is looking to have another extramarital affair (most likely during an incredibly important moment in history) and stick another contract......up the public's backside, & Ron Paul is being ignored as usual. Yep, were're screwed......as usual......
automan1223 5 months ago
TARP was good policy but bad politics! The reason TARP was put into effect was because if they would have simply let the entire financial system crash the only people that would have gotten hurt would have been average Americans! Fat cats on Wall Street already rigged the system so their money is protected! Just ask yourself this question....is the ex-CEO of Bear Stearns living under a bridge right now?
luvitluvitbaby 5 months ago
TARP was good policy but bad politics! The reason TARP was put into effect was because if they would have simply let the entire financial system crash the only people that would have gotten hurt would have been average Americans! Fat cats on Wall Street already rigged the system so their money is protected! Just ask yourself this question....is the ex-CEO of Bear Stearns living under a bridge right now?
luvitluvitbaby 5 months ago
The REAL trouble with Herman Cain, the former Kansas City Federal Reserve Chair is that he's just another NWO.WallSt.Banksters' HouseNegro, just like oBUSHma, you know, another ASTROTURF "grassroots" candidate?
The ONLY grassroots candidate in America IS Dr. Ron Paul. PERIOD.
Cain now LIES on campaign trail that he'"NEVER worked for govt." It's either admit that he was KC.Fed.Res.Chair, or expose that Fed.Res. is as "federal" as FedEx to the sheeple.
SO SICK & TIRED of RINO LIARS!
RosenKrantz666 5 months ago
The fact he was chairman of the federal reserve in Kansas is a good enough reason to not vote for him. We don't need a banker running the country.
Yabuturtle 5 months ago
Honestly, I couldnt even hear a word Tom said, I was too busy trying to figure out if those were horns there between his eye brows?!? WTF
3L33TON3 5 months ago
mitt romney - mr plastic man LOL
revelthehunter 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I say Again! To islam sympathizers who think 9/11 was inside job:
islam has had Bloody Crusades Most of time from 7th century to 21st century. This Involved the Slaughter of All who did Not Convert to islam!
They used Amputations of Any Body Part to Kill - Hands, Feet, Arms, Legs, or BEHEADINGS!!
On September 11, 1683 the islam Crusade was Stopped and Defeated at Vienna.
Hmmm. 9-11, 9/11. September 11, 2001 !!!!!!
3martijns 5 months ago
Why are they supporting Herman Cain? You have to ask? He's black, that's why. As to Ron Paul... he killed his chance of getting elected when he recently said that putting up a wall / fence on the border is a bad idea because it would keep American's in. OK, that's just off-the-charts kooky. What Paul was really saying is that he is 100% for open-borders immigration.
SouthernManX 5 months ago
Simple:
Cain: I wouldn't hire a Muslim
Cain: Israel, Israel, Israel.
He won in Florida because he got the heavy jewish vote.
the end.
RSnelli 5 months ago 12
This has been flagged as spam show
Herman Cain said "Don't blame the big banks. Don't blame Wall Street."
Cain quoted the Declaration of Independence and claimed it was the Constitution.
Cain said "Afro-Americans have been brain washed." and talks race more than politics.
Cain agreed with Paul on assassinating al-alwaki (and flip-flopped)
Cain said he wouldn't hire a Muslin (and flip-flopped)
Cain said "I don't know much about foreign policy, but I can learn."
Ron Paul 2012! If the US were a Muslim nation: /watch?v=Siyb8MYRjXs
vechorik 5 months ago
@RSnelli yea, and I heard the votes in the FL straw poll cost $175 bucks each, and each person could vote up to 10 times. That kind misconstrues the votes wouldn't you think? That'd be $1750 for each person, something the grassroots Ron Paul supporters might have a little trouble competing with against wealthy corporate theives. Thanks Tom Woods for spreading the message.
therotaryrocket 5 months ago
@RSnelli I doubt it since most Jewish people vote democrat. Antisemitism & freedom are diametrically opposed.
KenMacMillan 4 months ago
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
katman77018 5 months ago
Herman Cain is Herman Same! Same ole bank and Fed supported candidate. Ron Paul 2012!
toria555 5 months ago
Since the plastic Insider Establishment puke Perry can't even be swallowed by the usual gullible Reich Wing, the ruling elite now provides the sheeple with a more palatable plastic Insider. They have an endless supply too, if old Herman fails, there will be another one waiting in the wings. They will do everything including trotting out Jeb Bush(who they want to save for 2016 or later) if necessary. Anything to stop Ron Paul whom they despise and greatly fear.
Riverdrinker 5 months ago
Well if it's on the internet it must be true! Herman wrote the article about the economy in 2005 a much better year than anything after 2008.
gdsmckrls 5 months ago
Comment removed
DRNevans 5 months ago
Nope, he wrote about the economy into 2006. Go to the resource page in the video. The links are to Cain's own writings.
And duh, the whole point is that the economy looked fine superficially. Cain can't see beyond the superficial gloss. That is precisely the problem.
DRNevans 5 months ago
@DRNevans Ron Paul is right on alot of things, but I believe he is weak on many things including foreign policy. I like how he opposes socialized healthcare and is for getting rid such programs that we already have. I believe that among other steps would make that sector have to start competing for business.
gdsmckrls 5 months ago
Herman Cain can't mess with Tom Woods, he'd be better off in a one-on-one brawl with Batman.
batmanthe 5 months ago
Seems a lot of the paulees did Not see the debate where RP said 9/11 was our fault.
Put nails in his own coffin!
Cain will be vetted, so I have No problem with it.
Just waiting to see how conservative the top one will be.
3martijns 5 months ago
@3martijns --- because 9/11 was an inside you sheeple. Or we asked for it. Wake up fool....
PTTurboe 5 months ago
@PTTurboe It was?then someone better tell that wussy ron paul to say the truth about it--oh wait,he is a freemason so good l.luck with that..
alexjonesexposed1 5 months ago
@PTTurboe All of the 911 conspiracies have been debunked.
KenMacMillan 4 months ago
@KenMacMillan wow, that is complete utter BULLSHIT
antonfilth 4 months ago
@antonfilth Name one that hasn't been debunked.
KenMacMillan 4 months ago