WB Scott, " Black World Engineers,Scientists Encourage Using Higly Classified Technology for Civil Applications," AVIATION WEEK AND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, (March 9,1992):66-67, "Northrop Studying Sonic Boom Remedy,"AVIATION WEEK and SPACE Tech., (January 22,1968):21, AG Obolensky, THE MAGNETIC FORCE IS FASTER THAN LIGHT, T. Garber, et.al., "Space Transportation Systems, Launch Systems and Propulsion for the Space Exploration Initiative: Results from Project OUTREACH'" RAND Report N-3283-AF/NASA,1991
@quidproquo2004 POSSIBILITY OF A SRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha, Yokohama, Japan, Iwanaga, N. 1999, "Review of some Field Propulsion Methods from the General Relativistic Standpoint," AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, 1051-1059, "TT Brown, "How I Control Gravitation," SCIENCE AND INVENTION, Aug. 1929, " Towards Flight Without Stress Strain or Weight", INTEL, Washington, DC, INTERAVIA, March 23, 1956, "How to 'fall' into Space, BUSINESS WEEK, Feb 8, 1958, p.51-53
@quidproquo2004 Einstein and Laub, ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, V.26, 1908, P.533 and p. 541, Graham and Lahoz, "Observation of Static Electromagnetic Angular Momentum in Vacuo," NATURE, V. 285, May 15, 1980, P.129, FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR, Thomas B. Bahder and Chris Fazi, US AORMY research Lab, Adelphi, MD, 2000, JW Campbell, (NASA), "Cylindrical asymmetrical capacitor devices for Space Applications", US Pat.. 6,775,123, issued on Aug.10,2004.
@quidproquo2004 There are NASA vdeos of this effect working in vacuum on YouTube. You have not looked! Saxyl, EJ, "An Electrically Charged Torque Pendulum," NATURE, July 11, 1964, Woodward, James F,"A New Experimental Approach to Mac's Principle and Relativistic Gravitation," FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V3, No.5,1990, p.497, Woodward, "Flux Capacitors and the Origin of Inertia", FOUND OF PHYSICS, V.34, 2004, p. 1475.
@quidproquo2004 THis works more efficiently without atmosphere. The question of vacuum function was settled over half a century ago, in various countries, labs and institutions, and more recently by NASA, Purdue University, Takaaki Musha, and a client of mine John Fiala, als confirmed vacuum function, and onboard power. Ion wind is too weak a force to cause levitation of even a 5-gram model by over 3 orders of magnitude. Do the math youself! And this model is over 35 grams in weight!
@Beamshipcaptain Can you please point me to one credible source? APS, Nature, something? Where has NASA published results backing up your claim? According to NASA's website, their tests of the biefield brown effect were negative.
@quidproquo2004 Look at NASA's test of the concept in vacuum! Obviously, NASA LIES. Nothing new for NASA. We do not doubt we went to the moon, but we doubt that it was done all with Internal Combustion. It was the result of GERMAN extrapolations of Robert Goddard's pioneering work, and also Thomas Townsend Brown's work.
if you kinda think about it, what if some one was able to build a giant one of those in the shape as an equilateral triangle, this is just a rough estimate but it should probably be around 500 ft. to 200 ft long and wide. There would probably be enough ion wind to hold up a human or 2, maybe even an engine with a prop, the possibilities are endless.
Ion wind cannot lift anything, it is just too weak. The larger you build these craft, and the higher K factor the dielectrics, the more is the force, which is greater in vacuum.You cant have wind in vacuum, yet tests in various countries and institutions show air is actually an impediment to this mode of transport, they function faster and more efficiently in vaccum, like VACUUM TUBES.
This is your future, in transportation on and off this planet. Clean, quiet, non-polluting, and cool. You can lift anything, and travel as fast as you want. No inertia, no mass-dilation, no G-forces. The ONLY way to fly.
Try it yourself. In 2000, Purdue University flew these in hard vacuum, as did TT Brown, the inventor, Takaaki Musha (Honda R & D), Hector Serrano, etc. For example: upward thrust (as was achieved w/ 250 kV @ 2 milliAmps, by Brown) of 110 grams is equal to force of 10^5 dynes. By comparison, a 2 microAmpere ion wind resulting from electrons accelerated in a 250-kiloVolt potential would yield a force of over 10^-3 dynes, almost 100-million tumes less than the lift produced by Brown's apparatus.
Study th eB-2 Stealth Bomber. THAT is an electrogravitcs craft in the public-domain. Leading edge charged to fifteen million Volts, and negative charges shot out the exhaust.
Best way is to project a positive point of space-charge outside the disc, with phase-conjugate microwaves, and make the saucer negatively-charged. No need for separate-electrodes, that is so primitive.
Coulomb's law is the same as the Newton's law of universal gravitation!! Both share the same properties. The G constant is N*m^2/kg^2 and the k constant is N*m^2/C^2!!! If we could replace the place of weigh with charge it'll be fantastic.
The first law represents an attractive force, the second law - attractive AND REPULSIVE!
This all proves to me the Law of the squares and the Searl Effect.
Exactly right! In the effect, the cathode is attracted to the anode, and chases it around whichever direction it is oriented. Orented away from the Earth's surface, we call that vector ANTIGRAVITY. And onboard the craft you feel no stresses or G-forces or sense of motion,. just like standing on the Earth! Good research makes good science.
Obama's National Security advisor has just releas classified government files on the Biefeld-Brown electrogravitational effect, which is used in the B-2 Steath Bomber, and Obama has pedged to promote antigravitational technology of Professor John Searl and others in the first 100-days of his administration, for the benefit of the American People.
There is a two-meter Version (Beamship Variation III, on YouTube) and a 3-meter version. Larger you build them, more efficient they are and more they lift with less input-power. The 3-meter IGV craft I am building is a SLENDER DISC, a totally different technology than this simple Biefeld-Brown Device, which is just TT Brown's ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, in antigravitational mode. Great thing about Brown devices is you get lift, and propulsion, without any moving parts.
Already done 7-years ago, for research for my paper. With power maxed out on the commercial-supply at 60-Watts, can lift an additional 6-grams. Power to weight ratio is .87 Watts/gram of shi;p and payload. Highest power I ever used so far is a commercial ower supply fully-adjustable for current and Voltage, meterd, and current-limited to 1.5 MilliAmperes. max. powere I used was 40,000 Volts at 1.5 milliamps, and that multiplies out to a paltry 60-Watts per hour of electrical-energy.
yer really smart, i just get bored watching the same old video over and over again. is this a gravity modification affect? i know you robably say read this and this but it can take like an hour for me to read 10 pages. i get bored.
This is the famous Biefeld-Brown Effect, that 17-year old American Scientist Thomas Townsend Brown discovered in 1927. Lot of history, most of it classified, from 1955 to 1995. I've been working with it since 1990, and published a paper.
Payload is entirely dependent on VOLTAGE. With the five and six-footers, power-to weight ration is approx .87 Watts per gram of model-ship and payload. Curve is rourly linear until about 30-kV @ 1 milliampere (30Watts), the graph goes geometric, with a steep curve. Look at my paper in NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES July/August 2002, and the Journal OF NEW ENERGY, Vol7,#1. We keep power low for safety,(lightweight-models for low-safe-power) and to preclude x-rays and gamma-rays.
Read about it, and you shall be able to ask more informed questions, and most of your questions will be answered if you just read a bit about these technologies on your own, as I did. I am currently spending all my free time on the three-meter all polystyrene IGV, as part of my duties as commander in chief of manned flight for Swallowcommand. But feel free to replicate the experiments, as I did. I producede the goods, as I have been doing for the past 20-years, and been published.
Looks a lot like electrostatic repulsion to me. As such, it would work with either polarity. The repulsion will, I think, reduce as distance from the Earth increases. How high have you made one of these go, BSCaptain? If it ever made it into space, at best it would act as an ion engine with very low thrust. Not a hope of star travel, definitely not inertia free and no more than an amusing toy.
Are you planning to censor this comment Mr Beamshipcaptain?
We've gotten them up 15-feet in the air at a school in Delaware 6-years ago. Why dont you just read about the effect? Go to: ttbrown(dot)com,rexresearch(dot)com,jlnlabs(dot)com,disclosureproject(dot)org
If, as I suspect, this is electrostatic repulsion, it will obey the inverse square law. So you will find that the apparent thrust will drop off quite rapidly with distance from the earth's surface. As you yourself say - do the experiments. Take it outside on a calm day and use really long tethers or borrow a hanger for a day. If you can't get it up, you're wasting your time.
We see a lot of chat from you here, but not much else.
I ask you again sir, what will your 3 metre device demonstrate?
It is ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACION that makes thes fly in any direction thety are oriented(Coulomb's Law), and when inverted they get HEAVIER, when energised. Like gravity, and all force-fields in Nature, they obey the inverse-square law.
Japanese in Tokyo have the largest, and you can see photo of it at a lab at a University in Tokyo, floating over 40-feet above the grond, Theis is NOT electrostatic repulsion. It is electrostatic ATTRACTION. The primary lifting force comes from the cathode-plate. 3-meter device is the design of Professor John Searl, which he commissioned me to build as part of my duties as comander in chief of the Manned Flight Division of SWALLOWCOMMAND. Just a replica of the 10-foot P-11, from 1968.
We've had them 12-feet in the air, at a school in Delaware in December,2002. Iv'e bounced them off the ceiling in my apartment. And flown heavy sheet metal sacers in horizontal propulsion mode, from TT Brown's original patent(US Pat. # 2,949,550 ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS) and they fley around a maypole, with a few Watts. Covered in plastic bags, they flew BACKWARDS, at same speed, in Nevada, in June, 2000.
Read TOWARD A NEW TESLA SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETICS, by TE Bearden, ETHER TECHNOLOGY, by RHo Sigma. TT Brown, the inventor, had proven by 1938 with model boats with charged rim segments and aluminum-hulls that animal and plant passengers onboard the models felt NO stress or G-force, no matter how sharp a turn, or instant starts and stops, at ANY speed. Read: "Toward Flight without Stress, Strain, or Weight (INTERAVIA journal, March 13, 1956).
Thank the late American pioneer of this, his invention: ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, US Pat.#2,949,550, issued August.16,1960. I built first two-foot and later 3-foot diameter Thomas Townsend Brown saucers in the 1980s. Demoed 3-foot HEAVY sheet-aluminum,copper,and perpex saucers at 2ns Antigravity Conference in Reno, Nevada,June24,2000.Wrked even sealed in plastic. The STARS beckon.
You better believe its painful. Effects from like a wasp-sting, to a stun-gun set on full. Painful, I'd say EXTREMELY PAINFUL TO FATAL, depending on power level, and if you somehow get in circuit with earth-ground. Do not build and fly these without a physics-teacher, or qualified electrical-expert present if you do not know what you are doing. *BE SAFE* LIVE, to help us induct this new age of warp-drive for All Mankind. God Bless TT Brown.
A gravity-field is vectored from the BLOCH-Wall, centre of any bar magnet,(North flips polarity to south, zone of no magnetism),and from the centre of a parallel-plate capacitor,or condensor.Gravity has no polarity,as a central neutral force.Gravity-waves have TWICE the spin of EM-waves,and as such Gravity-waves are a quadropole field-source.Please visit americanantigravity dot com,swallowcommand dot com,and ttbrown dot com.E and B-fields produce gravity at 90-degrees to their centers.
Thanks you very much. Very hard to understand all this as a non-native speaker and a layman in physics. I will need a lot of time to even understand the basics, but I feel it's worth it!
It only sounds like mumbo jumbo to the layman. Open up a book on Physics. I suggest GEOMETRODYNAMICS (1962) by Wheeler. Brush up on your vectors and tensors, and algebraic formulae.
Keep Reading. Make up your own mind that God gave you. It DOES INDEED work in hard vacuum, and Takaaki Musha showed recently how it works better in vacuum than in an atmosphere.
In this form of propulsion, TT Brown's ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS (US Pat.#2,949,550),
the ENTIRE SKIN OF THE SHIP is the "engine". That is why this form of propulsion is inertialess, as TT Brown had proven by 1938 with ciecular model-boats with charged/insulated rim segments. Animals and plants onboard felt NOTHING.
These models have won at least two science-fairs, and been on the telly on the news. Try the experiment yourself; I'll show you how, that is my mission!
You need at least 18KV for primary ionisation. To genrate a good force-field, you should also supply at least 1 milliapmere to replace charge lost to space by th thin wires. And two or three tethers, and the lead and return wires hold it down. Lead and return and anode-wires are .003" stainless-steel, thinner than hair.
When you ROTATE the condensors, and use SOLID dielectrics, with K-factors in the tens of thousands, and highest mass, the force can lift TONS, easily, and work AS WELL OR BETTER in a hard vacuum of outer-space. Existence of these government, and off-world craft (and their crews), is slowly being let-out, as recently by one chap last month on his deathbed;conffirmed Roswell was a real crash with Extraterrestrials. The Govt. makes ALL its decisions on the assumption that we are stupid!
God bless us all! NEW SCIENCE + OLD SUPPRESSED SCIENCE and technolgy; shifts POWER back to the common-man in the street, from the multinational corporations. I am here to HELP. And by doing so, we advance, in science and technology.
Good! Keep researching. Don't forget, this is only ONE TT Brown patent (USPat. #2,949,550), and there are many configurations of the effect, some with solid dielectric, some with air-dielectrics. Solid dielectrics have the most force, and consistently work in vacuum. In vacuum-no dielectric, so the "lifters" with close-gap that are mostly ion-thrust (which is weak, compared to BB-effect) generally dont work. This is only ONE method of BARYCENTRIC CONTROL.
Ok, they have done experiments, just watch the Discovery Channel show mythbusters during the antigravity episode, and try to go the Google video and download "THE CASE FOR ANTIGRAVITY" and research the "Hutchison Effect" and Evidence The Case for NASA UFO's - Part 1 and 2 and more of Mr. Burkhard Heim
I should'nt have used that olde English phrase. I am a man of Reason, not faith (except that God exists). Noone seems willing to recreate the ships on their own, to confirm that they work as advertised. "O ye of little faith, just repeat ye olde Beamship model experiments, and a tankard of ale be waitin' for the upon success of thy task". Just do the experiments. Or order the kits, and get lifetime tech-support from yours truly. Peace.
Yes. "Antigravity propulsion is IMPOSSIBLE for us stupid Earthpeople, it's all DONE WITH STRINGS, because everyone knows antigravity and free-energy is IMPOSSIBLE!" Give me a freaking break! Dude, just try it. If yu're not too lazy. Don't you know everything you see is fake! NOTHING IS REAL, life is ALL FAKE! God, most Earth people are amazingly stupid, and have ZERO imagination! Try it, I'll show you how. Look at Variation II at the WRAM show.
Yes, I published my paper for peer-review, and you can find it in the JOURNAL OF NEW ENERGY, Vol 7, #1, and NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, July-Aug.2002. I delivered my paper and lectured before REAL SCIENTISTS in 2000 in Reno, Nevada at the 2nd Antigravity conference, where we presented working flying disks, and in Salt-Lake City Utah, and won the 2003 Detroit-Metro Science-fair grand-prix in Physics for three Dearborn, MI science students. Thsi works in hard vacuum. MANY successful vacuum-rigs.
OMG - could it be that Beamshipcaptain is not one of us 'Earth people'? Is that why he's called Beamship Captain? He came here in his Beamship but somehow broke it or ran out of dilithim crystals and now he's desperately trying to build another one so he can get back home?
WB Scott, " Black World Engineers,Scientists Encourage Using Higly Classified Technology for Civil Applications," AVIATION WEEK AND SPACE TECHNOLOGY, (March 9,1992):66-67, "Northrop Studying Sonic Boom Remedy,"AVIATION WEEK and SPACE Tech., (January 22,1968):21, AG Obolensky, THE MAGNETIC FORCE IS FASTER THAN LIGHT, T. Garber, et.al., "Space Transportation Systems, Launch Systems and Propulsion for the Space Exploration Initiative: Results from Project OUTREACH'" RAND Report N-3283-AF/NASA,1991
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@quidproquo2004 POSSIBILITY OF A SRONG COUPLING BETWEEN ELECTRICITY AND GRAVITATION, Takaaki Musha, Yokohama, Japan, Iwanaga, N. 1999, "Review of some Field Propulsion Methods from the General Relativistic Standpoint," AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICS, 1051-1059, "TT Brown, "How I Control Gravitation," SCIENCE AND INVENTION, Aug. 1929, " Towards Flight Without Stress Strain or Weight", INTEL, Washington, DC, INTERAVIA, March 23, 1956, "How to 'fall' into Space, BUSINESS WEEK, Feb 8, 1958, p.51-53
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@quidproquo2004 Einstein and Laub, ANNALEN DER PHYSIK, V.26, 1908, P.533 and p. 541, Graham and Lahoz, "Observation of Static Electromagnetic Angular Momentum in Vacuo," NATURE, V. 285, May 15, 1980, P.129, FORCE ON AN ASYMMETRIC CAPACITOR, Thomas B. Bahder and Chris Fazi, US AORMY research Lab, Adelphi, MD, 2000, JW Campbell, (NASA), "Cylindrical asymmetrical capacitor devices for Space Applications", US Pat.. 6,775,123, issued on Aug.10,2004.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@quidproquo2004 There are NASA vdeos of this effect working in vacuum on YouTube. You have not looked! Saxyl, EJ, "An Electrically Charged Torque Pendulum," NATURE, July 11, 1964, Woodward, James F,"A New Experimental Approach to Mac's Principle and Relativistic Gravitation," FOUNDATIONS OF PHYSICS LETTERS, V3, No.5,1990, p.497, Woodward, "Flux Capacitors and the Origin of Inertia", FOUND OF PHYSICS, V.34, 2004, p. 1475.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
This has nothing to do with gravity. It only works in the presence of the atmosphere.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
@quidproquo2004 THis works more efficiently without atmosphere. The question of vacuum function was settled over half a century ago, in various countries, labs and institutions, and more recently by NASA, Purdue University, Takaaki Musha, and a client of mine John Fiala, als confirmed vacuum function, and onboard power. Ion wind is too weak a force to cause levitation of even a 5-gram model by over 3 orders of magnitude. Do the math youself! And this model is over 35 grams in weight!
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
@Beamshipcaptain Can you please point me to one credible source? APS, Nature, something? Where has NASA published results backing up your claim? According to NASA's website, their tests of the biefield brown effect were negative.
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
@quidproquo2004 Look at NASA's test of the concept in vacuum! Obviously, NASA LIES. Nothing new for NASA. We do not doubt we went to the moon, but we doubt that it was done all with Internal Combustion. It was the result of GERMAN extrapolations of Robert Goddard's pioneering work, and also Thomas Townsend Brown's work.
Beamshipcaptain 1 year ago
wonder if its possible for metallic molecules to change / react to enegry available in abundance in our atmostphere.
sphinxofthenewage 1 year ago
awsome !!! i think the next logical step in the lifter technology is to add it to a coanda effect uav .can it be done? jedi master !!!!!
dozerminer 2 years ago 3
if you kinda think about it, what if some one was able to build a giant one of those in the shape as an equilateral triangle, this is just a rough estimate but it should probably be around 500 ft. to 200 ft long and wide. There would probably be enough ion wind to hold up a human or 2, maybe even an engine with a prop, the possibilities are endless.
Burn8tor 2 years ago
Ion wind cannot lift anything, it is just too weak. The larger you build these craft, and the higher K factor the dielectrics, the more is the force, which is greater in vacuum.You cant have wind in vacuum, yet tests in various countries and institutions show air is actually an impediment to this mode of transport, they function faster and more efficiently in vaccum, like VACUUM TUBES.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
cool
Burn8tor 2 years ago
This is your future, in transportation on and off this planet. Clean, quiet, non-polluting, and cool. You can lift anything, and travel as fast as you want. No inertia, no mass-dilation, no G-forces. The ONLY way to fly.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
That is either an ionocraft or a piece of tin foil on strings, and neither are an example of gravitational manipulation.
llAVALANCHEll 2 years ago
Try it yourself. In 2000, Purdue University flew these in hard vacuum, as did TT Brown, the inventor, Takaaki Musha (Honda R & D), Hector Serrano, etc. For example: upward thrust (as was achieved w/ 250 kV @ 2 milliAmps, by Brown) of 110 grams is equal to force of 10^5 dynes. By comparison, a 2 microAmpere ion wind resulting from electrons accelerated in a 250-kiloVolt potential would yield a force of over 10^-3 dynes, almost 100-million tumes less than the lift produced by Brown's apparatus.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
@Beamshipcaptain Why were they the only ones? Why not ten, twenty or thirty?
quidproquo2004 1 year ago
So, for a space based Lifter the anode should somehow be attached in front of the cathode at the same saucer for a chase down motion?
Hansolo60 2 years ago
Study th eB-2 Stealth Bomber. THAT is an electrogravitcs craft in the public-domain. Leading edge charged to fifteen million Volts, and negative charges shot out the exhaust.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Best way is to project a positive point of space-charge outside the disc, with phase-conjugate microwaves, and make the saucer negatively-charged. No need for separate-electrodes, that is so primitive.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Both are directly proportional to the product of the two masses/charges and inversely proportional to the square of the distance between them!
Hansolo60 2 years ago 2
Exactly right. Good research makes good science and technology.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
You were right about the electrostatics!
Coulomb's law is the same as the Newton's law of universal gravitation!! Both share the same properties. The G constant is N*m^2/kg^2 and the k constant is N*m^2/C^2!!! If we could replace the place of weigh with charge it'll be fantastic.
The first law represents an attractive force, the second law - attractive AND REPULSIVE!
This all proves to me the Law of the squares and the Searl Effect.
Hansolo60 2 years ago 6
Exactly right! In the effect, the cathode is attracted to the anode, and chases it around whichever direction it is oriented. Orented away from the Earth's surface, we call that vector ANTIGRAVITY. And onboard the craft you feel no stresses or G-forces or sense of motion,. just like standing on the Earth! Good research makes good science.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Yes, thanks for correcting me, THE WORLD. We are ALL Earth-people. Well, most of us.
Beamshipcaptain 2 years ago
Obama's National Security advisor has just releas classified government files on the Biefeld-Brown electrogravitational effect, which is used in the B-2 Steath Bomber, and Obama has pedged to promote antigravitational technology of Professor John Searl and others in the first 100-days of his administration, for the benefit of the American People.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
There is a two-meter Version (Beamship Variation III, on YouTube) and a 3-meter version. Larger you build them, more efficient they are and more they lift with less input-power. The 3-meter IGV craft I am building is a SLENDER DISC, a totally different technology than this simple Biefeld-Brown Device, which is just TT Brown's ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, in antigravitational mode. Great thing about Brown devices is you get lift, and propulsion, without any moving parts.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
now you need to see how much weight it can lift
AnEliteSpartan 3 years ago 3
Already done 7-years ago, for research for my paper. With power maxed out on the commercial-supply at 60-Watts, can lift an additional 6-grams. Power to weight ratio is .87 Watts/gram of shi;p and payload. Highest power I ever used so far is a commercial ower supply fully-adjustable for current and Voltage, meterd, and current-limited to 1.5 MilliAmperes. max. powere I used was 40,000 Volts at 1.5 milliamps, and that multiplies out to a paltry 60-Watts per hour of electrical-energy.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
yer really smart, i just get bored watching the same old video over and over again. is this a gravity modification affect? i know you robably say read this and this but it can take like an hour for me to read 10 pages. i get bored.
AnEliteSpartan 3 years ago 2
This is the famous Biefeld-Brown Effect, that 17-year old American Scientist Thomas Townsend Brown discovered in 1927. Lot of history, most of it classified, from 1955 to 1995. I've been working with it since 1990, and published a paper.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Payload is entirely dependent on VOLTAGE. With the five and six-footers, power-to weight ration is approx .87 Watts per gram of model-ship and payload. Curve is rourly linear until about 30-kV @ 1 milliampere (30Watts), the graph goes geometric, with a steep curve. Look at my paper in NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES July/August 2002, and the Journal OF NEW ENERGY, Vol7,#1. We keep power low for safety,(lightweight-models for low-safe-power) and to preclude x-rays and gamma-rays.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Read about it, and you shall be able to ask more informed questions, and most of your questions will be answered if you just read a bit about these technologies on your own, as I did. I am currently spending all my free time on the three-meter all polystyrene IGV, as part of my duties as commander in chief of manned flight for Swallowcommand. But feel free to replicate the experiments, as I did. I producede the goods, as I have been doing for the past 20-years, and been published.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Yes, Mr Brown apparently did all that 70 years ago and where is a live demonstration today that we can witness and verify in a valid manner?
Where is your 3 metre demonstration and what does it do? Where are Searl's 4 ton examples that you talk about elsewhere?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
Looks a lot like electrostatic repulsion to me. As such, it would work with either polarity. The repulsion will, I think, reduce as distance from the Earth increases. How high have you made one of these go, BSCaptain? If it ever made it into space, at best it would act as an ion engine with very low thrust. Not a hope of star travel, definitely not inertia free and no more than an amusing toy.
Are you planning to censor this comment Mr Beamshipcaptain?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
We've gotten them up 15-feet in the air at a school in Delaware 6-years ago. Why dont you just read about the effect? Go to: ttbrown(dot)com,rexresearch(dot)com,jlnlabs(dot)com,disclosureproject(dot)org
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
15 feet? And you're claiming 'Star-Travel' in your lifetime?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago 2
!5-foot tethers were the longest we had. Indoors, they can obviously only go to the ceiling. There is NO altitude limit, why would there be?
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
If, as I suspect, this is electrostatic repulsion, it will obey the inverse square law. So you will find that the apparent thrust will drop off quite rapidly with distance from the earth's surface. As you yourself say - do the experiments. Take it outside on a calm day and use really long tethers or borrow a hanger for a day. If you can't get it up, you're wasting your time.
We see a lot of chat from you here, but not much else.
I ask you again sir, what will your 3 metre device demonstrate?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
It is ELECTROSTATIC ATTRACION that makes thes fly in any direction thety are oriented(Coulomb's Law), and when inverted they get HEAVIER, when energised. Like gravity, and all force-fields in Nature, they obey the inverse-square law.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Japanese in Tokyo have the largest, and you can see photo of it at a lab at a University in Tokyo, floating over 40-feet above the grond, Theis is NOT electrostatic repulsion. It is electrostatic ATTRACTION. The primary lifting force comes from the cathode-plate. 3-meter device is the design of Professor John Searl, which he commissioned me to build as part of my duties as comander in chief of the Manned Flight Division of SWALLOWCOMMAND. Just a replica of the 10-foot P-11, from 1968.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
We've had them 12-feet in the air, at a school in Delaware in December,2002. Iv'e bounced them off the ceiling in my apartment. And flown heavy sheet metal sacers in horizontal propulsion mode, from TT Brown's original patent(US Pat. # 2,949,550 ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS) and they fley around a maypole, with a few Watts. Covered in plastic bags, they flew BACKWARDS, at same speed, in Nevada, in June, 2000.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Read TOWARD A NEW TESLA SCALAR ELECTROMAGNETICS, by TE Bearden, ETHER TECHNOLOGY, by RHo Sigma. TT Brown, the inventor, had proven by 1938 with model boats with charged rim segments and aluminum-hulls that animal and plant passengers onboard the models felt NO stress or G-force, no matter how sharp a turn, or instant starts and stops, at ANY speed. Read: "Toward Flight without Stress, Strain, or Weight (INTERAVIA journal, March 13, 1956).
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
stunning!
JamesF63 3 years ago
Thank the late American pioneer of this, his invention: ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS, US Pat.#2,949,550, issued August.16,1960. I built first two-foot and later 3-foot diameter Thomas Townsend Brown saucers in the 1980s. Demoed 3-foot HEAVY sheet-aluminum,copper,and perpex saucers at 2ns Antigravity Conference in Reno, Nevada,June24,2000.Wrked even sealed in plastic. The STARS beckon.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Is it painful to touch?
DrBrazil1 3 years ago
You better believe its painful. Effects from like a wasp-sting, to a stun-gun set on full. Painful, I'd say EXTREMELY PAINFUL TO FATAL, depending on power level, and if you somehow get in circuit with earth-ground. Do not build and fly these without a physics-teacher, or qualified electrical-expert present if you do not know what you are doing. *BE SAFE* LIVE, to help us induct this new age of warp-drive for All Mankind. God Bless TT Brown.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
A gravity-field is vectored from the BLOCH-Wall, centre of any bar magnet,(North flips polarity to south, zone of no magnetism),and from the centre of a parallel-plate capacitor,or condensor.Gravity has no polarity,as a central neutral force.Gravity-waves have TWICE the spin of EM-waves,and as such Gravity-waves are a quadropole field-source.Please visit americanantigravity dot com,swallowcommand dot com,and ttbrown dot com.E and B-fields produce gravity at 90-degrees to their centers.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Thanks you very much. Very hard to understand all this as a non-native speaker and a layman in physics. I will need a lot of time to even understand the basics, but I feel it's worth it!
Dreaming of SMI²LE,
Fox
Sterlingfox 3 years ago
its hard to understand because is mumbo-jumbo, like the ones used in cheap TV sci-fi shows like Star Trek.
there is NO anti-gravity.
rogerpenna 3 years ago
It only sounds like mumbo jumbo to the layman. Open up a book on Physics. I suggest GEOMETRODYNAMICS (1962) by Wheeler. Brush up on your vectors and tensors, and algebraic formulae.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
Keep Reading. Make up your own mind that God gave you. It DOES INDEED work in hard vacuum, and Takaaki Musha showed recently how it works better in vacuum than in an atmosphere.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
how could this be used on a space ship?
ballpointpen86 4 years ago 2
In this form of propulsion, TT Brown's ELECTROKINETIC APPARATUS (US Pat.#2,949,550),
the ENTIRE SKIN OF THE SHIP is the "engine". That is why this form of propulsion is inertialess, as TT Brown had proven by 1938 with ciecular model-boats with charged/insulated rim segments. Animals and plants onboard felt NOTHING.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Your the fuckin bozo. It's ionic wind or electrostetic propulsion. He's a scientist, not a lazy couch-bag like you.
mechaghostman2 4 years ago 3
These models have won at least two science-fairs, and been on the telly on the news. Try the experiment yourself; I'll show you how, that is my mission!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
You need at least 18KV for primary ionisation. To genrate a good force-field, you should also supply at least 1 milliapmere to replace charge lost to space by th thin wires. And two or three tethers, and the lead and return wires hold it down. Lead and return and anode-wires are .003" stainless-steel, thinner than hair.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
When you ROTATE the condensors, and use SOLID dielectrics, with K-factors in the tens of thousands, and highest mass, the force can lift TONS, easily, and work AS WELL OR BETTER in a hard vacuum of outer-space. Existence of these government, and off-world craft (and their crews), is slowly being let-out, as recently by one chap last month on his deathbed;conffirmed Roswell was a real crash with Extraterrestrials. The Govt. makes ALL its decisions on the assumption that we are stupid!
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
AMEN !!!!!!!!!!!
n987 4 years ago
Thank you!!!!!!! i appreciate the help.!!!!\
GOD BLESS YOU!!
n987 4 years ago
God bless us all! NEW SCIENCE + OLD SUPPRESSED SCIENCE and technolgy; shifts POWER back to the common-man in the street, from the multinational corporations. I am here to HELP. And by doing so, we advance, in science and technology.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Good! Keep researching. Don't forget, this is only ONE TT Brown patent (USPat. #2,949,550), and there are many configurations of the effect, some with solid dielectric, some with air-dielectrics. Solid dielectrics have the most force, and consistently work in vacuum. In vacuum-no dielectric, so the "lifters" with close-gap that are mostly ion-thrust (which is weak, compared to BB-effect) generally dont work. This is only ONE method of BARYCENTRIC CONTROL.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
Ok, they have done experiments, just watch the Discovery Channel show mythbusters during the antigravity episode, and try to go the Google video and download "THE CASE FOR ANTIGRAVITY" and research the "Hutchison Effect" and Evidence The Case for NASA UFO's - Part 1 and 2 and more of Mr. Burkhard Heim
n987 4 years ago
You, of little faith!!!!!
n987 4 years ago
I should'nt have used that olde English phrase. I am a man of Reason, not faith (except that God exists). Noone seems willing to recreate the ships on their own, to confirm that they work as advertised. "O ye of little faith, just repeat ye olde Beamship model experiments, and a tankard of ale be waitin' for the upon success of thy task". Just do the experiments. Or order the kits, and get lifetime tech-support from yours truly. Peace.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
you can see the string lifting it up
LORDERIK13 4 years ago
Yes. "Antigravity propulsion is IMPOSSIBLE for us stupid Earthpeople, it's all DONE WITH STRINGS, because everyone knows antigravity and free-energy is IMPOSSIBLE!" Give me a freaking break! Dude, just try it. If yu're not too lazy. Don't you know everything you see is fake! NOTHING IS REAL, life is ALL FAKE! God, most Earth people are amazingly stupid, and have ZERO imagination! Try it, I'll show you how. Look at Variation II at the WRAM show.
Beamshipcaptain 4 years ago
but this IS NOT antigravity. Have you released a paper for peer review? Obviously not, since real scientists would DEFRAUD it after a few seconds...
rogerpenna 3 years ago
Yes, I published my paper for peer-review, and you can find it in the JOURNAL OF NEW ENERGY, Vol 7, #1, and NEW ENERGY TECHNOLOGIES, July-Aug.2002. I delivered my paper and lectured before REAL SCIENTISTS in 2000 in Reno, Nevada at the 2nd Antigravity conference, where we presented working flying disks, and in Salt-Lake City Utah, and won the 2003 Detroit-Metro Science-fair grand-prix in Physics for three Dearborn, MI science students. Thsi works in hard vacuum. MANY successful vacuum-rigs.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
OMG - could it be that Beamshipcaptain is not one of us 'Earth people'? Is that why he's called Beamship Captain? He came here in his Beamship but somehow broke it or ran out of dilithim crystals and now he's desperately trying to build another one so he can get back home?
ContemporaryScience 3 years ago
We are all the SAME. Whatever planet we hail from, we are all Children of The God.
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago
How very astute. I am a child of GOD. The entire UNIVERSE is my home!
Beamshipcaptain 3 years ago