howd that guy land on his feet? anyway, i was going to join the police academy. but after all this shit w/ the govt going on, i have most definitely changed my mind.
The first one is intentional assault with a deadly weapon, and should result in jail time for the officer. The second is the same thing. Police are nothing but thugs with tin badges. Their only job is to BADGER, HARASS, LIE, and ENTRAP you until they can arrest or fine you. Police are simply revenue collectors for the state, and most are bullies and criminals themselves. They have ZERO obligation to protect you or even respond to your calls for help. They don't serve you, the ENSLAVE you.
so your answer is the police should just not chase people who have commited crimes because chasing them results in chases. maybe the anwer is the dbags who are running should just man up to what they have done and not run.
@strangerberry thats the whole fucking point are you and cops that fucking stupid to not realize that when YOU ARE CHASING SOMEONE THEY ARE BOUND TO RUN AWAY 90% of all chase related crashes i blame 100% on the cops its common sense you stop chasing the person they would of never went as fast as they did and the crash fatal or not would of never happened... and if some cop did that to my bike oh believe me id fucking take your life in a heart beat.. you cops.. sorry Pigs make me sick
@brandyn420420 1. I am NOT a police officer 2. I'm not from the USA, I live in the netherlands and damn I wish our cops did the same as US cops... for example; 2 months ago there was a guy stealing petrol... he just drove off without paying... the suspect rammed a few police cars, the dutch police thought they were so damn smart they made a traffic jam infront of them... the suspect rammed a car because he didn't see the traffic jam, the inocent driver was killed. justice, right?
@strangerberry dude again.... Think about what I said you pretty much just said the same thing in different words....let me spell it out... Cops Are the stupidest fucked up people to walk on the earth monkeys and dogs are smarter blind folded... for a cop to think that making someone crash over 5 dollars of weed or a 100$ ticket and cause them to loose there life or someone else's and then blame that very act that the cop just created on that person "THEY" made crash... like what the fuck, DTC..
Great video of the Greatest Troopers in the world, Our men get the job done!
We support out Troopers!
We have a lot of idiots who run from the police on bikes, we call them Organ Donors!! You run you die, SC motto! We hear all the crying from the bikers when one gets killed after running from the police! It's their own fault, you run from the law and die, IT'S YOUR DAMN FAULT! That's it, don't blame the police, your are running for a reason so next time you hear a cop just pull over!
(con't) i cant get close or he'll wake up swinging. i learnd 2 lessons in 1 day. my dad packs a mean wallop when he hits & to stand at the door & yell at him to get up. all bcuz of stupid little punks. God forbid i ever try to lie to that man he is a walkin lie detector. thx to all the bullshit stories people fed him throughout the yrs. cops should get to rough criminals up, maybe they wont break the laws as much in fear of a ass kickin by the cops. cuz this catch and release ain't working.
more like troopers doing there jobs. boohoo if they roughed someone up (which i saw none of) its not like its a walk in then park for them either. punks r always tryin beat them up, but oh thats a part of their job they deserve it. do u have n e idea how that messes with a cops head? well i can tell ya my dad a police chief 16yrs and a total of 22yrs in the biz, i would like to be able to wake my dad up by a shake on the back but i cant bcuz its his cop instinct to fight. (con't)
The second video... all I can think of, is how bizarre that would be for the driver, if it was a case of mistaken identity? Make a wrong turn, so you pull an illegal u-turn... and BAM cop rams you for it. Take that you naughty u-turn-er you. Next it'll be the j-walkers turn.
lol but in all fairness to the cops, these are the endings to police pursuits. So I see nothing wrong with what happened.
i dont think the troopers didnt anything wrong its actually kinda funny since the only person hurt was the person breaking the law he shouldnt have run from the police its never smart
Its fuckin stupid he hit the motorcycle that way! I ride and that guy was extremely lucky. Ive broken my arm, dislocated my shoulder, and injured my hand from a accident much smaller than that.
There is a difference between executing a PIT maneuver and intentionally accelerating into the driver side of a vehicle. Hitting a motorcycle with a car is essentially the same as hitting a pedestrian with a car - never acceptable.
@1775novten it was not a pit maneuver it was blocking him in so he don't get out and hitting someone on a motorcycle is not the same thing as hitting a pedestrian. Hitting a motorcycle is the same thing as hitting a motorcycle. Both were uninjured and both were stopped from running and the chance of them injuring an innocent person is no more.
@shaobri8 There is a difference between blocking the door and accelerating into the door, which isn't the same. Intentionally running head on with a motorcycle is closer to hitting a pedestrian than it is to hitting a car - it was reckless. Listen, both these drivers were in the wrong for running, both that does not give officers carte blanche to do whatever the hell they want. The motorcycle is more an issue for me than the car.
@1775novten He didn't accelerate into the door to injure the person he did it because the driver was about to open it. You make it sound like he accelerated to 90mph and T-Boned him. Same thing with the motorcycle, the guy got knocked off his bike and got right up to his feet. Police have limited resources and a fine line in which to use them. They get no respect and to hate them and their actions have become a fashion. It's so sad.
@shaobri8 haha, "police have limited resources" - are you crazy? Do you have any idea what their budgets are? Police have become more militarized than ever before. Police focus most of their funds on devices that catch traffic violations, rather than violent crimes. Police spend their money on militarized weapons and vehicles, instead of upping patrols in bad neighborhoods. New York is wanting buy DRONES - how is that necessary?
@1775novten So what you are saying is there was a drone involved in this and it was not police cars but militarized vehicles and weapons.? What ever funding police have it is not enough. They have seconds to make a risk decision and everyone else talks about how bad of a decision that was to make. Who cares what kind of crime it is the only thing that should be a concern is the protection of the innocent.
@shaobri8 No, the point is that they are wasting money on non-vital weapons and machines. So you think police should have unlimited funding? And so should the military right? Don't you think that is huge chunk of why this country is in such a huge debt? I'd rather have more officers on the street patrolling, then drones and militarized weapons and vehicles.
@1775novten I have yet to see these things on our streets or even being used. And yes they should have unlimited resources and so should our military (I'm in the military so that may be a bit bias lol) We are in debt because our so called leaders make horrible choices (OHHHH DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THAT!) We are not in debt because we pay our police and military and to think that is why is kinda crazy.
@shaobri8 You don't see the militarized weapons and vehicles that look like military grade vehicles, or didn't see the news report about New York looking into buying drones? I also am a veteran who then worked as a military contractor and we all know that fraud, waste and abuse is rampant at every level of government. Nothing should have an unlimited budget. If our military wasn't spread all throughout the world, we wouldn't need half the budget we use.
@1775novten No I don't see them, and if they have them they are used for extraordinary situations. Police always need the upper hand. Always. You are correct we need to crack down on the fraud in the military but that is where we fix the problem not lessening the money to our military. If we were not all over the world then terrorism would run ramped. We are the most powerful nation in the world and with that comes a responsibility weather we like it or not.
@shaobri8 The world is not our responsibility. If we can't even protect our own borders then why the heck are we worrying about others countries'? It would be nice to help other countries, but if you don't have the money, then you don't have the money. Would you put yourself in huge debt to donate money to a charity? It doesn't make sense. If we brought all our troops home and lined our borders with them, our country would be impenetrable at half the cost.
@1775novten Thats like saying spider man should stay inside his house and watch for burglars. What happens in other countries effect our country weather it is with oil or the economy. I would agree with you if this were not the case but the global economy has a direct effect on ours. terrorism plays a tremendous role in this factor due to Oil being produced in the middle east.
@shaobri8 We aren't even on the same continent of the countries that we "babysit" and force our will on. There are other closer Nato Nations that could watch concerning countries. And again, these are "nice to haves" and luxuries. If you don't have the money, then you simply can't do it - or at least that is the way it should be. And we all know that we have just as much oil here in the US and other countries - we just want to use theirs first.
@1775novten Again Nato has nothing to do with our economy and it is not in there interest. We don't have to be on the same continent to have effect on our country. We have to regulate what happens in other parts of the world because it effects us directly. if we were a self sufficient country I could agree with you but due to our business practices and need for oil that is just not the case. I know you can't see the relevance now but when it will cost you $10 for a tomato maybe you will
@shaobri8 That is a scary mentality you have. You think we have the right or authority or jurisdiction to impose our will on other countries and make them do what we want? Sounds like we are the bullies of the world instead of the protectors of the world. If you feel that way, then why don't we just take over all these countries and make them part of America and start collecting taxes from them instead of pouring money into them?
@1775novten I am not saying that we should go into any country and take what we want. what i am saying is that any country that poses a threat to us or any other country needs to be regulated.
@shaobri8 Who are we to say that another country needs our forced regulation? Are we the world's judge and jury. Another countries should be free to do as they please, just as we are in our country. When did Iraq threaten us? When did Iran threaten us? And speaking of Iran, who are we to tell another country that they can't develop nuclear technology or weapons when we have the most nuclear weapons in the world? We are a country of do as I say, not as I do.
@1775novten if Iran were to have nuclear tech. do you think they would use it for good? We are a super power so we are the ones to say. thats it in a nutshell. it sucks it has to be us but with great power comes great responsibility, I'm sure you herd that somewhere. If iran were to have nuclear capabilities then missiles would be headed for Israel the next day. We have it for defense purposes only, when they get it it will be for offense. so you think we should sit by and let that happen?
@shaobri8 What Iran does with it is none of our business. If at some point we find out that they have the technology and intent to launch nuclear weapons at us (which they never would), then we take them out at that point. You are missing the point that we are a shell of greatness - we are borrowing money from China to funds wars that don't involve us. We can't just keep printing worthless money to fund our "wants".
@1775novten None of our business? WHAT! ok so you are on a different level here. This is the same mentality that we had with Hitler and he took oner a number of countries before we got involved. maybe thats what needs to be done. have terrorism take over before we get involved, let gas prices reach $30 a gallon before we get involved. let millions of innocent men women and children die before we get involved. I can tell we are on a totally different page here.
@shaobri8 Knowingly and watching a country commit genocide is a different basket. Again, we can't AFFORD to babysit the world, as nice as that may be. If other countries were as concerning with these apparent threats as we make them out to be, then other countries would be climbing over us to be the ones on the front line. But that isn't the case, we are always the one pumping the propaganda and funding all the suppressive military actions.
@shaobri8 Unrelated to this video, but my biggest issue with the police these days is that it seems like their focus has shifted from public servants and protectors to revenue collectors. I rarely see cops patrolling our neighborhoods but I ALWAYS see then hiding on the roads to catch traffic violations. They sit and work the roads until they get a call for crime and then they show to make the report - that is the day in the life of a cop.
@1775novten You never see a cop riding around in his patrol car? Granted there are not enough to patrol all the neighborhoods but they each have sectors of the city that they have to patrol in order to respond in minimal amount of time. I do agree with you on one thing. We need more cops, so all the money being spent on dumb stuff could get more cops on the street so be it. but that will be more cops choices for people to question. Can you handle that?
@shaobri8 I can handle that as long as they focus on being public servants and not revenue collectors and corporate interest protectors. Of course I have seen an occasional patrol car drive around, but I'm saying that their primary amount of time is focused on driving infractions while they wait to be called from crimes in progress - are you disputing that? I think it should be the other way around.
@1775novten Hundreds of thousands of people die each year due to traffic accidents. They have priorities that comes from their Chain of Command. If you would like to see them more in the neighborhoods then it would be a county problem that you would need to address at the next town hall meeting.
@shaobri8 That's not true, it's about an average of 40,000 per year. And most of those are "accidents", not from people being drunk or reckless. Only about 1/3 are attributed to alcohol. And 13% of the deaths are pedestrians crossing the road. You really think the focus should be on drivers who didn't come to a "full and complete stop" at a stop sign? Decisions are based on money, not what I say at a town hall meeting.
@1775novten Your right I was thinking about the drug abuse and alcohol statistic. but keep in mind its not only about death, what about injuries and properly damage? now we are talking in the millions of people effected and millions of dollars that insurance companies have to pay which jack our rates up. Not everything is a scandal or corruption money don't always influence decisions, Statistics influence decisions.
@shaobri8 Money does influence decisions - all the way to the top. That is the job of a lobbyist - to influence politic decision with money. I agree that reckless driving and excessive speeding should not be tolerated, but it's the petty infractions that police revenues thrive on. Food for thought - police don't try and prevent these infractions by showing their presence, they try and CATCH these infractions by hiding. Doesn't that sound backwards?
@1775novten I am not arguing saying that money don't buy decisions. I am saying that it don' t buy all decisions. lobbyists try to get people elected that will vote in there favor, but in the end we are the ones who elect them. and I could agree with you if all the police did was hide but they don't they are out on the streets as well.
@shaobri8 They are usually hiding on the streets. And I'll give them the benefit of the doubt (even though I don't have any doubt) that they only hide sometimes - why hide at all? The focus should be prevention right? Not catching. Why have unmarked sports cars and use them to bait drivers to race or to "catch" them on other violations? The police often use baiting techniques with other crimes as well.
@shaobri8 No, I know presence is prevention. Baiting is encouraging - that's what baiting means. It's to lure someone into committing a crime, that may not have otherwise committed the crime if they weren't presented with such juicy bait. Either way, it doesn't explain why police hide at all on the streets. It would create greater public safety if they showed their presence instead of hiding it. We all behave better if we know someone is watching, then if we don't. Just human nature.
@1775novten Baiting is prevention because it targets people that are willing to commit the crime and instead of waiting for them to commit this crime on citizens they bait them into committing the crime in there controlled territory. Innocent civilians are not going to take a car thats not theirs just because its there. People are going to speed no matter what. The only way to prove someone is speeding is to catch them on radar. this is more effective when the patrol car is stationary.
@shaobri8 You are correct to an extent, but they leave these cars way "juicy" than any citizen would. Who in their right mind would leave a nice SUV with the doors open and keys on the car in the middle of the ghetto? No one - and if they do, then they deserve to get their vehicle stolen (not really, but you get my point). A patrol car being stationary out in the open is different then it hiding. Both can catch, but one is intending to deceive and hide.
@shaobri8 Here's a personal example that they focus on revenue collection instead of public safety. I came to an intersection that wasn't very unclear and evidently I disregarded a traffic sign. So I got pulled over and I explained to the cop my confusion and that I didn't intentionally disregard anything. You know what his response was? "I know, I catch people here all day long." If they cared about safety, they would fix the problem, not collect on the intentional confusion.
@shaobri8 Yes they do. They patrol the streets and are responsible for the safety of the motorists on the streets. If they see an unsafe condition, it is their JOB to report it, not to prey on it. Even if it means posting a traffic cop at that intersection until the unsafe condition is resolved. Police do do that.
@1775novten another reason why police should have unlimited resources. If it were that unsafe I am sure there would be an officer posted but they can't be every where right? its all about priorities. Listen I can't speak for all police officers and police policies all I can say is that its a better place with them out there then with them not being there. Could police do a better job? Of course they could You could be doing better at your job so could I. Not everything is perfect
@shaobri8 My example requires no extra resources or officer. The officer that is sitting and hiding to prey on the safety hazard, could instead come out of hiding and direct traffic. No extra resources required. But the problem is that wouldn't help the officer's review, but the dozens of tickets he could write will. At the end of the day, it's all about the paycheck. Agree that they provide a vital service, I just would like them to refocus their efforts.
@1775novten Well it sounds like you and the judge have fixed this problem and there are probably millions of other problems behind that one that need to be addressed, but at the end of the day the officer is out there midst all the naysayers and people who would rather see him dead and call him a pig he is out there serving these very same people. he may not be doing as good of a job as you would like but I hope you are not too distraught that he is receiving a paycheck for it.
@shaobri8 "He's not doing as good of a job as you would like"? I would like him to just do his job, what he was doing that day was criminal and an endangerment to the citizens. Me nor the judge fixed the problem, that officer will continue to do it because that is what his supervisors encourage. The more the revenue to the chief raises for the city, the more the city officials will support him.
@1775novten So now police don't do their job at all? How was the public endangered by the police actions? the only ones involved were the perps. You act like the police are only out to get the innocent. Don't speed you won't get a ticket. don't roll past stop signs you won't get a ticket Obey traffic laws and you won't get a ticket. That way none of your corrupt supporting officials get paid.
@shaobri8 No, THAT officer wasn't doing his job. Traffic citations are like sins, we all do it eventually. So to say not to do it, is like saying not to sin. Police are trained that if they want to pull a car over, that they just need to keep following the car, because odds are that they will eventually do something that will let them pull them over. Besides, I see patrol car intentionally breaking these same petty laws, that they enforce. It's a double standard.
@shaobri8 Here's another example of how it's all about the money. Check this video out if you get a chance watch?v=d9ArxnkWck0 This shows how a police unit (DICE) which is funded solely on the money it collects is letting drugs pass through the State, so that they call seize the money on its way back through. If these officers don't seize money, then they will lose their jobs. Now tell me that isn't a conflict or interest or fueled by money. This one is undeniable.
@1775novten after watching it do you think the police are still over funded? They have to steal to provide funding for their war on drugs. Look I know that there are cops that give police a bad name I seen the videos of cops beating people up and this and that, but let me ask you one question. Seriously think about it Are we better off with out them? We are not going to turn every cop to a saint just like we will never get all drugs off the street but is this place better with them out there?
@shaobri8 Yes, I still say they are over funded. That section of the department (DICE) is solely funded by drug money. Meaning these police making their living on drug money. Without it, they would lose their jobs. Which gives them incentives to steal ALL the money that comes through there - without even charging your for a crime. They force you to prove you are innocent, instead of what the law say, which is that they have to prove you are guilty. They are corrupt.
@shaobri8 Yes, I think the police have lost their way and now in most cases they are not needed. If people would exercise their 2nd Amendment and take their personal and property protection into their own hands, then cops wouldn't be needed in most cases. Just detectives to clear the scene afterwards. Police have become the most dangerous and violent gang in our streets. They have become power-drunk and no longer work for the people.
@1775novten What the fuck guy are you high? It's called the 4th amendment dumbass. The 4th amendment protects your sorry ass from un-lawful police. It keeps police inline and points out the bad police so they get taken off the street. You take away police and there would be so much destruction and mayhem. Why do you think they were created in the first place hmm??
@77internationalscout I think you must have me confused with someone else. I never said we should get rid of police entirely - I just think their numbers could be reduced if people took responsibility for themselves. These days, we rely on police to handle every little snivle we have. We expect them to discipline our children and step in when someone calls us a bad name. We are too dependent and need to let them focus on real crimes.
@77internationalscout In some locations my statement is true. A group of unarmed people that can unleash brutal violence without repercussion is terrifying and is no different than the mafia. The police have the backing of the government and literally get away with murder. I'm sure you've seen countless videos on here of blatant thugs in uniforms terrorizing citizens and subjecting them to brutality. But I know it isn't like that everywhere.
@1775novten There are huge repercussions for bad behaving cops, its called getting fired, the 4th amendment protects against unlawful cops and does a pretty damn good job. It make it extremly hard for cops to become out of line. Plus your government statement is false. State police and local cops are funded by the state powers not the Gov. Government controls border patrol and shit.
@77internationalscout There are not huge repercussions for bad cops - getting fired is not a huge repercussions. You would get fired from your job as well if you did something that warranted it. The difference is that if cops commit a crime they just get fired, but if a citizen commits a crime they can get arrested and fired. Are you clear on what government means? I didn't say Federal government.
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
@77internationalscout Oh I agree with you 100% that cops deal with a lot of bs and people continually call them for the stupidest of reasons. Again, I never said all cops are bad. I also understand the requirements to become a cop, as I was actually in the process of becoming one myself when I got out of the Marine Corps. It may have just been my city, but I decided they didn't do things they way I liked and opted out. I'm sure there are great departments though.
@77internationalscout Oh, I could have. I just opted not to, because I didn't like the way my city department handled themselves. I did numerous ride-alongs with numerous different officers and it was always the same complacent "standard routine" attitude. I didn't view them as servants or peace officers. None of them ever tried building relationships with the community - it was always an us against them attitude. Not how I envisioned my service.
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
@shaobri8 And if it wasn't the police's job, then why when I went to court for the ticket and explained to the judge the situation and what the officer told me (luckily the officer was honest and admitted what he told me), then why did the judge turn to the officer and ask why did the department not report it and enacted safety precautions. Although the judge tried to hide his emotions, you could tell he was upset with the officer. Ticket was dismissed.
@shaobri8 Yes, luckily the biker doesn't appear to be injured. But luck doesn't justify the action. Are you saying if the biker would have died that you wouldn't think it was justified? You have to analyze the action, not the result. That cop took that bikers life in his hand - it wasn't worth it. Again, the biker was in the wrong and should be harshly punished, but not with his life.
@1775novten The police officer did what he thought was necessary to get this guy off the road before he killed someone. The biker was not going to pull over and he made a risk decision. Would it be bad if the biker died? of course it would but i would rather his life be in danger rather than a innocent bystander. I would rather his life be in danger rather than him having an opportunity to escape. police have seconds to make the decisions and the innocent take priority.
@shaobri8 Even if a biker crashes into a vehicle as full speed, the odds of the passengers being injured are minimal - the odds of the biker killing himself is high. I do realize that officers have seconds to make choices. You often see departments call off chases and let the driver "escape", because they realize the risk of causing an accident is not worth it.
@1775novten Its not about the biker hitting someone its about someone avoiding the biker and causing a bigger accident. Someone swerves to avoid the biker and don't see the family walking across the street or gets into a head on collision because he was avoiding the biker. There are a lot of things that could go wrong.
@shaobri8 So is it a mistake for departments to call off high speed reckless chases? I definitely see your point and maybe if it were a car, I would think it were justified, but I just have a hard time with a patrol car driving head on into a biker's path - knowing that the biker will go flying as a result.
@1775novten If a department calls off a chase its because they think it would be to dangerous to pedestrians to continue. Remember the innocent come first. It is not like the cop or the bike were in a high speed chase they were both going at slower speeds, actually the cop stopped in front of the bike and the bike hit the cop. I could see your point if there were greater speeds but they weren't
@shaobri8 The car was not stopped. You can clearly see that the car drove directly into the biker's path - knowing that it would cause the biker to go flying. If that biker wasn't wearing a helmet and leathers, he would have been dead or severely mangled. Do you think the violence the police are using against the Oakland protesters is warranted and justified? Youtube is littered with videos of officers using violence against non violent people.
Hot shot cops, if you rammed Police car you would be up for attemped murder but the cops can use their cars to ram you and it's alright. The last part of the video the car was stopped there was no need to ram it. Cowards !!!!
the last one is kind of bullshit, people are going to say that's to disable the car to prevent them from running but the cop went straight for the guy in the passenger seat, its hard to imagine that is policy. I mean cops can shoot out tires, deploy spikes, write the plates down and put an APB out, and investigate the address associated with the DL number. If it is the policy it seems like a bad one, as the benefits to public safety are greatly overshadowed by the potential consequences.
I don't think there's enough footage to judge these as good or bad. There's not enough context. For how long did the chases take place? What were the nature of the crimes? What kind of resistance, if any, took place? They both seem like over reactions to the situations but a few seconds of video hardly tells the whole story.
HAHAHA that was hilarious maybe this dumb ass should run from the police.... personally I would of hit him from the rear of bike and watch him fish tail the do some flips on the pavement fucker got what he deserved.
the only wrong doing is is that they didn't crash them hard enough! They all still looked pretty fine by me! So, next time, hit the gas, not the brake, ok!?!
This comment is for "superpornindustry" and "hunkgod" for super u say Chicago sucks your dick? You must have been in boys town... And for Mr hunk. Nothing against being a hardman and nothing against the police. Half my guys are cops and they ride too and they say that this video is BULLSHIT and that was cowardly. Grow some balls...
@gtspeed927 Oh a hard man. Chicago has cops too and I am sure they would do the same thing. Don't fucking break the law. Its that simple. Either way the cop is gonna kick your little bitch ass.
I paused the video before the second clip but I don't understand what they did wrong in the first one? The guy was clearly speeding away, hit another car, came off the bike, was okay to stand up so they arrested him? No excessive force, just enough to stop him from running off...
I'm not a bitch to the police but I think that sometimes they are made out worse than they are, I was expecting them to do something seriously wrong like beat the guy up or something...
@Superhiru Fuck you are stupid. His ass was well enough to get up and start walking. The safety of the officer is more important, he could have been getting ready to pull a gun out and shoot them. They didn't hit or beat him, just cuffed him. You just need to shut the fuck up with the anti police bitching.
@oldstock1607 You don't know the whole story. What did this guy do that was so bad that he had to run from the police? Maybe he was wanted for murder, you don't know what he did. It most likely was justifiable, but if it wasn't you're right.. the apartment could have been sued if that subject would have died.
@michaelnelson816 if he had been physically seen murdering someone immediately prior to this, or had fired upon police immediately before this happened, I could see this as possibly justifiable. For ANYTHING else it shows a cavalier attitude towards human life.
@oldstock1607 Watching it again it looked like the trooper who hit him didn't really realise what he did just by looking at the way he approached him.
@oldstock1607 You don't know the whole story. What did this guy do that was so bad that he had to run from the police? Maybe he was wanted for murder, you don't know what he did. It most likely was justifiable, but if it wasn't you're right.. the department could have been sued if that subject would have died.
@oldstock1607 Evading police by instigating a high speed chase is attempted murder. Plain and simple. Cops are allowed to shoot a suspect aiming a gun at the public, even if they haven't killed anyone yet. This is that same concept.
@oldstock1607 Watch the video again. The guy is walking at the end. No murder. You can see the cop pulling away just before turning back in to the guy. It may be possible he did an initial swerve to scare the guy into slowing down, then determined that they were both going slow enough that a collision would most likely not be life-threatening for the motorcyclist. Based on the fact that he stopped within a couple of feet of the collision, you can tell the cop car was barely even moving.
@CaptainCocaine No, the rider didn't die, but he VERY easily could have. I don't know of a person on earth who has been driving for more than a year who doesn't know that striking someone head on with a vehicle--at any speed--while they are travelling towards you at high speed, could possibly end in death. If not death, paralysis or grievous bodily injury are very likely outcomes of such a reprehensible act. There is just no safe way to knock someone off a motorcycle with a car.
@oldstock1607 There's also no safe way to run from the cops. The motorcyclist must have known that when he tried to evade. He knew the stakes. He made the decision to risk his life.
Hmm motorcycle chase. Best choice? F*ck him up with a car? Real smart decision peice of sh*t cop. F*ck all of these cops im leaving this country and moving to a country where the cops have brains and think before trying to take some ones life.
@somewhatd It's the cops duty to save as many lives as possible...The first clip was absolutely unacceptable...He could have killed that guy...The second was also ridiculous...The car was stopped no need to injure the guy or yourself by being a complete dumbass and fucking up both cars....These two stops were handled the most costly way possible...Not only did they fuck up the cruisers but the may have gotten hurt... the stupid fucks...
@somewhatd He/She was on a motorcycle under those circumstances different precautions should be made... you never know why their running ... shouldnt give them the right to run them over...
@somewhatd I am sure that you are an american...at the 1st video you see a bike...the worst thing that can happen to a bike accident is fatal crash of the biker..so that's what they do..at 2nd video..the worst thing that can happen to a stopped(fucking stopped) car is another car hit it..so that's what they do...the guy in the orange car surrended and the fucker crashed him..
@georgerelax7302 I agree that the second video was uncalled for; but the first one was done in a orderly and other people safe as possible, the dude in the bike had it coming for him...
@fruitychees I've already answered to that..the worst thing a biker can do is kill himself and that's what the cops are trying to do...and don't start saying that if he hits a clhild and bullshits...noone goes on the street when the cops are chasing..they know how stupid they are..
These cops did nothing wrong. I thought they did their job and did it without abuse.
sumoman25 1 month ago
This was the best way to stop him!!!! I mean really how else were they going to stop them? I want answers
ryan6627 1 month ago
howd that guy land on his feet? anyway, i was going to join the police academy. but after all this shit w/ the govt going on, i have most definitely changed my mind.
mmuseb 1 month ago
Fuck cops there all faggots
jmessina4 1 month ago
The first one is intentional assault with a deadly weapon, and should result in jail time for the officer. The second is the same thing. Police are nothing but thugs with tin badges. Their only job is to BADGER, HARASS, LIE, and ENTRAP you until they can arrest or fine you. Police are simply revenue collectors for the state, and most are bullies and criminals themselves. They have ZERO obligation to protect you or even respond to your calls for help. They don't serve you, the ENSLAVE you.
911wuzjews 1 month ago
so your answer is the police should just not chase people who have commited crimes because chasing them results in chases. maybe the anwer is the dbags who are running should just man up to what they have done and not run.
dontknowjack16 2 months ago
all i can say is FUCK THE COPS.....
234567892685 2 months ago
are they not aware of that fact that they have a fucking dashboard cam?
hackerdots 3 months ago
these cops just wanted new cars
img0ingin 3 months ago
hmmm can't see the problem with both vids...
the troopers did there job... and IMO it was the only good way to prevent citizens getting hurt
strangerberry 3 months ago 4
@strangerberry err? you kidding? The guy was sitting in his car and the cop just smashed his car into it? How is that doing his job?
tshirttime84 2 months ago
@strangerberry thats the whole fucking point are you and cops that fucking stupid to not realize that when YOU ARE CHASING SOMEONE THEY ARE BOUND TO RUN AWAY 90% of all chase related crashes i blame 100% on the cops its common sense you stop chasing the person they would of never went as fast as they did and the crash fatal or not would of never happened... and if some cop did that to my bike oh believe me id fucking take your life in a heart beat.. you cops.. sorry Pigs make me sick
brandyn420420 2 months ago
@brandyn420420 1. I am NOT a police officer 2. I'm not from the USA, I live in the netherlands and damn I wish our cops did the same as US cops... for example; 2 months ago there was a guy stealing petrol... he just drove off without paying... the suspect rammed a few police cars, the dutch police thought they were so damn smart they made a traffic jam infront of them... the suspect rammed a car because he didn't see the traffic jam, the inocent driver was killed. justice, right?
strangerberry 3 weeks ago
@strangerberry dude again.... Think about what I said you pretty much just said the same thing in different words....let me spell it out... Cops Are the stupidest fucked up people to walk on the earth monkeys and dogs are smarter blind folded... for a cop to think that making someone crash over 5 dollars of weed or a 100$ ticket and cause them to loose there life or someone else's and then blame that very act that the cop just created on that person "THEY" made crash... like what the fuck, DTC..
brandyn420420 3 weeks ago
@strangerberry I agree here with strangerberry
rwnlof 3 weeks ago
@strangerberry You are 100% right my friend.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
Great video of the Greatest Troopers in the world, Our men get the job done!
We support out Troopers!
We have a lot of idiots who run from the police on bikes, we call them Organ Donors!! You run you die, SC motto! We hear all the crying from the bikers when one gets killed after running from the police! It's their own fault, you run from the law and die, IT'S YOUR DAMN FAULT! That's it, don't blame the police, your are running for a reason so next time you hear a cop just pull over!
mbbeachguy 3 months ago
(con't) i cant get close or he'll wake up swinging. i learnd 2 lessons in 1 day. my dad packs a mean wallop when he hits & to stand at the door & yell at him to get up. all bcuz of stupid little punks. God forbid i ever try to lie to that man he is a walkin lie detector. thx to all the bullshit stories people fed him throughout the yrs. cops should get to rough criminals up, maybe they wont break the laws as much in fear of a ass kickin by the cops. cuz this catch and release ain't working.
jayrichards23ok 4 months ago
more like troopers doing there jobs. boohoo if they roughed someone up (which i saw none of) its not like its a walk in then park for them either. punks r always tryin beat them up, but oh thats a part of their job they deserve it. do u have n e idea how that messes with a cops head? well i can tell ya my dad a police chief 16yrs and a total of 22yrs in the biz, i would like to be able to wake my dad up by a shake on the back but i cant bcuz its his cop instinct to fight. (con't)
jayrichards23ok 4 months ago
The second video... all I can think of, is how bizarre that would be for the driver, if it was a case of mistaken identity? Make a wrong turn, so you pull an illegal u-turn... and BAM cop rams you for it. Take that you naughty u-turn-er you. Next it'll be the j-walkers turn.
lol but in all fairness to the cops, these are the endings to police pursuits. So I see nothing wrong with what happened.
elfwall 4 months ago
i dont think the troopers didnt anything wrong its actually kinda funny since the only person hurt was the person breaking the law he shouldnt have run from the police its never smart
xxMRGRENADExx 4 months ago
bastards
shivator 4 months ago
DONT RUN FROM THE POLICE!!! AND WHEN THEY CATCH YOU< DONT BE A PUSSY AND CRY THAT "THEY HIT ME". all you had to do was stop.......MORON!
macocwbyz72 4 months ago
@macocwbyz72 why .your cops are sadistic, i can say what i want they are the asshole..pussycat!
shivator 4 months ago
I didnt see anything wrong. . . .
Bajass00 4 months ago
@Bajass00 are you sick ....? or idiot?
shivator 4 months ago
Its fuckin stupid he hit the motorcycle that way! I ride and that guy was extremely lucky. Ive broken my arm, dislocated my shoulder, and injured my hand from a accident much smaller than that.
nationallegend 4 months ago
wow in the second clip the driver purposely drives faster so he could ram that other car
ViiviiDNiiNJA 4 months ago
There is a difference between executing a PIT maneuver and intentionally accelerating into the driver side of a vehicle. Hitting a motorcycle with a car is essentially the same as hitting a pedestrian with a car - never acceptable.
1775novten 4 months ago
@1775novten it was not a pit maneuver it was blocking him in so he don't get out and hitting someone on a motorcycle is not the same thing as hitting a pedestrian. Hitting a motorcycle is the same thing as hitting a motorcycle. Both were uninjured and both were stopped from running and the chance of them injuring an innocent person is no more.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 There is a difference between blocking the door and accelerating into the door, which isn't the same. Intentionally running head on with a motorcycle is closer to hitting a pedestrian than it is to hitting a car - it was reckless. Listen, both these drivers were in the wrong for running, both that does not give officers carte blanche to do whatever the hell they want. The motorcycle is more an issue for me than the car.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten He didn't accelerate into the door to injure the person he did it because the driver was about to open it. You make it sound like he accelerated to 90mph and T-Boned him. Same thing with the motorcycle, the guy got knocked off his bike and got right up to his feet. Police have limited resources and a fine line in which to use them. They get no respect and to hate them and their actions have become a fashion. It's so sad.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 haha, "police have limited resources" - are you crazy? Do you have any idea what their budgets are? Police have become more militarized than ever before. Police focus most of their funds on devices that catch traffic violations, rather than violent crimes. Police spend their money on militarized weapons and vehicles, instead of upping patrols in bad neighborhoods. New York is wanting buy DRONES - how is that necessary?
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten So what you are saying is there was a drone involved in this and it was not police cars but militarized vehicles and weapons.? What ever funding police have it is not enough. They have seconds to make a risk decision and everyone else talks about how bad of a decision that was to make. Who cares what kind of crime it is the only thing that should be a concern is the protection of the innocent.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 No, the point is that they are wasting money on non-vital weapons and machines. So you think police should have unlimited funding? And so should the military right? Don't you think that is huge chunk of why this country is in such a huge debt? I'd rather have more officers on the street patrolling, then drones and militarized weapons and vehicles.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten I have yet to see these things on our streets or even being used. And yes they should have unlimited resources and so should our military (I'm in the military so that may be a bit bias lol) We are in debt because our so called leaders make horrible choices (OHHHH DON'T GET ME STARTED ON THAT!) We are not in debt because we pay our police and military and to think that is why is kinda crazy.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 You don't see the militarized weapons and vehicles that look like military grade vehicles, or didn't see the news report about New York looking into buying drones? I also am a veteran who then worked as a military contractor and we all know that fraud, waste and abuse is rampant at every level of government. Nothing should have an unlimited budget. If our military wasn't spread all throughout the world, we wouldn't need half the budget we use.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten No I don't see them, and if they have them they are used for extraordinary situations. Police always need the upper hand. Always. You are correct we need to crack down on the fraud in the military but that is where we fix the problem not lessening the money to our military. If we were not all over the world then terrorism would run ramped. We are the most powerful nation in the world and with that comes a responsibility weather we like it or not.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 The world is not our responsibility. If we can't even protect our own borders then why the heck are we worrying about others countries'? It would be nice to help other countries, but if you don't have the money, then you don't have the money. Would you put yourself in huge debt to donate money to a charity? It doesn't make sense. If we brought all our troops home and lined our borders with them, our country would be impenetrable at half the cost.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Thats like saying spider man should stay inside his house and watch for burglars. What happens in other countries effect our country weather it is with oil or the economy. I would agree with you if this were not the case but the global economy has a direct effect on ours. terrorism plays a tremendous role in this factor due to Oil being produced in the middle east.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 We aren't even on the same continent of the countries that we "babysit" and force our will on. There are other closer Nato Nations that could watch concerning countries. And again, these are "nice to haves" and luxuries. If you don't have the money, then you simply can't do it - or at least that is the way it should be. And we all know that we have just as much oil here in the US and other countries - we just want to use theirs first.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Again Nato has nothing to do with our economy and it is not in there interest. We don't have to be on the same continent to have effect on our country. We have to regulate what happens in other parts of the world because it effects us directly. if we were a self sufficient country I could agree with you but due to our business practices and need for oil that is just not the case. I know you can't see the relevance now but when it will cost you $10 for a tomato maybe you will
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 That is a scary mentality you have. You think we have the right or authority or jurisdiction to impose our will on other countries and make them do what we want? Sounds like we are the bullies of the world instead of the protectors of the world. If you feel that way, then why don't we just take over all these countries and make them part of America and start collecting taxes from them instead of pouring money into them?
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten I am not saying that we should go into any country and take what we want. what i am saying is that any country that poses a threat to us or any other country needs to be regulated.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Who are we to say that another country needs our forced regulation? Are we the world's judge and jury. Another countries should be free to do as they please, just as we are in our country. When did Iraq threaten us? When did Iran threaten us? And speaking of Iran, who are we to tell another country that they can't develop nuclear technology or weapons when we have the most nuclear weapons in the world? We are a country of do as I say, not as I do.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten if Iran were to have nuclear tech. do you think they would use it for good? We are a super power so we are the ones to say. thats it in a nutshell. it sucks it has to be us but with great power comes great responsibility, I'm sure you herd that somewhere. If iran were to have nuclear capabilities then missiles would be headed for Israel the next day. We have it for defense purposes only, when they get it it will be for offense. so you think we should sit by and let that happen?
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 What Iran does with it is none of our business. If at some point we find out that they have the technology and intent to launch nuclear weapons at us (which they never would), then we take them out at that point. You are missing the point that we are a shell of greatness - we are borrowing money from China to funds wars that don't involve us. We can't just keep printing worthless money to fund our "wants".
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten None of our business? WHAT! ok so you are on a different level here. This is the same mentality that we had with Hitler and he took oner a number of countries before we got involved. maybe thats what needs to be done. have terrorism take over before we get involved, let gas prices reach $30 a gallon before we get involved. let millions of innocent men women and children die before we get involved. I can tell we are on a totally different page here.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Knowingly and watching a country commit genocide is a different basket. Again, we can't AFFORD to babysit the world, as nice as that may be. If other countries were as concerning with these apparent threats as we make them out to be, then other countries would be climbing over us to be the ones on the front line. But that isn't the case, we are always the one pumping the propaganda and funding all the suppressive military actions.
1775novten 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Unrelated to this video, but my biggest issue with the police these days is that it seems like their focus has shifted from public servants and protectors to revenue collectors. I rarely see cops patrolling our neighborhoods but I ALWAYS see then hiding on the roads to catch traffic violations. They sit and work the roads until they get a call for crime and then they show to make the report - that is the day in the life of a cop.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten You never see a cop riding around in his patrol car? Granted there are not enough to patrol all the neighborhoods but they each have sectors of the city that they have to patrol in order to respond in minimal amount of time. I do agree with you on one thing. We need more cops, so all the money being spent on dumb stuff could get more cops on the street so be it. but that will be more cops choices for people to question. Can you handle that?
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 I can handle that as long as they focus on being public servants and not revenue collectors and corporate interest protectors. Of course I have seen an occasional patrol car drive around, but I'm saying that their primary amount of time is focused on driving infractions while they wait to be called from crimes in progress - are you disputing that? I think it should be the other way around.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Hundreds of thousands of people die each year due to traffic accidents. They have priorities that comes from their Chain of Command. If you would like to see them more in the neighborhoods then it would be a county problem that you would need to address at the next town hall meeting.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 That's not true, it's about an average of 40,000 per year. And most of those are "accidents", not from people being drunk or reckless. Only about 1/3 are attributed to alcohol. And 13% of the deaths are pedestrians crossing the road. You really think the focus should be on drivers who didn't come to a "full and complete stop" at a stop sign? Decisions are based on money, not what I say at a town hall meeting.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Your right I was thinking about the drug abuse and alcohol statistic. but keep in mind its not only about death, what about injuries and properly damage? now we are talking in the millions of people effected and millions of dollars that insurance companies have to pay which jack our rates up. Not everything is a scandal or corruption money don't always influence decisions, Statistics influence decisions.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Money does influence decisions - all the way to the top. That is the job of a lobbyist - to influence politic decision with money. I agree that reckless driving and excessive speeding should not be tolerated, but it's the petty infractions that police revenues thrive on. Food for thought - police don't try and prevent these infractions by showing their presence, they try and CATCH these infractions by hiding. Doesn't that sound backwards?
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten I am not arguing saying that money don't buy decisions. I am saying that it don' t buy all decisions. lobbyists try to get people elected that will vote in there favor, but in the end we are the ones who elect them. and I could agree with you if all the police did was hide but they don't they are out on the streets as well.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 They are usually hiding on the streets. And I'll give them the benefit of the doubt (even though I don't have any doubt) that they only hide sometimes - why hide at all? The focus should be prevention right? Not catching. Why have unmarked sports cars and use them to bait drivers to race or to "catch" them on other violations? The police often use baiting techniques with other crimes as well.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten You know baiting is prevention right?
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 No, I know presence is prevention. Baiting is encouraging - that's what baiting means. It's to lure someone into committing a crime, that may not have otherwise committed the crime if they weren't presented with such juicy bait. Either way, it doesn't explain why police hide at all on the streets. It would create greater public safety if they showed their presence instead of hiding it. We all behave better if we know someone is watching, then if we don't. Just human nature.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Baiting is prevention because it targets people that are willing to commit the crime and instead of waiting for them to commit this crime on citizens they bait them into committing the crime in there controlled territory. Innocent civilians are not going to take a car thats not theirs just because its there. People are going to speed no matter what. The only way to prove someone is speeding is to catch them on radar. this is more effective when the patrol car is stationary.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 You are correct to an extent, but they leave these cars way "juicy" than any citizen would. Who in their right mind would leave a nice SUV with the doors open and keys on the car in the middle of the ghetto? No one - and if they do, then they deserve to get their vehicle stolen (not really, but you get my point). A patrol car being stationary out in the open is different then it hiding. Both can catch, but one is intending to deceive and hide.
1775novten 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Here's a personal example that they focus on revenue collection instead of public safety. I came to an intersection that wasn't very unclear and evidently I disregarded a traffic sign. So I got pulled over and I explained to the cop my confusion and that I didn't intentionally disregard anything. You know what his response was? "I know, I catch people here all day long." If they cared about safety, they would fix the problem, not collect on the intentional confusion.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten again a county problem to fix road signs and make them more clear. Police don't do that.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Yes they do. They patrol the streets and are responsible for the safety of the motorists on the streets. If they see an unsafe condition, it is their JOB to report it, not to prey on it. Even if it means posting a traffic cop at that intersection until the unsafe condition is resolved. Police do do that.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten another reason why police should have unlimited resources. If it were that unsafe I am sure there would be an officer posted but they can't be every where right? its all about priorities. Listen I can't speak for all police officers and police policies all I can say is that its a better place with them out there then with them not being there. Could police do a better job? Of course they could You could be doing better at your job so could I. Not everything is perfect
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 My example requires no extra resources or officer. The officer that is sitting and hiding to prey on the safety hazard, could instead come out of hiding and direct traffic. No extra resources required. But the problem is that wouldn't help the officer's review, but the dozens of tickets he could write will. At the end of the day, it's all about the paycheck. Agree that they provide a vital service, I just would like them to refocus their efforts.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Well it sounds like you and the judge have fixed this problem and there are probably millions of other problems behind that one that need to be addressed, but at the end of the day the officer is out there midst all the naysayers and people who would rather see him dead and call him a pig he is out there serving these very same people. he may not be doing as good of a job as you would like but I hope you are not too distraught that he is receiving a paycheck for it.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 "He's not doing as good of a job as you would like"? I would like him to just do his job, what he was doing that day was criminal and an endangerment to the citizens. Me nor the judge fixed the problem, that officer will continue to do it because that is what his supervisors encourage. The more the revenue to the chief raises for the city, the more the city officials will support him.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten So now police don't do their job at all? How was the public endangered by the police actions? the only ones involved were the perps. You act like the police are only out to get the innocent. Don't speed you won't get a ticket. don't roll past stop signs you won't get a ticket Obey traffic laws and you won't get a ticket. That way none of your corrupt supporting officials get paid.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 No, THAT officer wasn't doing his job. Traffic citations are like sins, we all do it eventually. So to say not to do it, is like saying not to sin. Police are trained that if they want to pull a car over, that they just need to keep following the car, because odds are that they will eventually do something that will let them pull them over. Besides, I see patrol car intentionally breaking these same petty laws, that they enforce. It's a double standard.
1775novten 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Here's another example of how it's all about the money. Check this video out if you get a chance watch?v=d9ArxnkWck0 This shows how a police unit (DICE) which is funded solely on the money it collects is letting drugs pass through the State, so that they call seize the money on its way back through. If these officers don't seize money, then they will lose their jobs. Now tell me that isn't a conflict or interest or fueled by money. This one is undeniable.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten after watching it do you think the police are still over funded? They have to steal to provide funding for their war on drugs. Look I know that there are cops that give police a bad name I seen the videos of cops beating people up and this and that, but let me ask you one question. Seriously think about it Are we better off with out them? We are not going to turn every cop to a saint just like we will never get all drugs off the street but is this place better with them out there?
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Yes, I still say they are over funded. That section of the department (DICE) is solely funded by drug money. Meaning these police making their living on drug money. Without it, they would lose their jobs. Which gives them incentives to steal ALL the money that comes through there - without even charging your for a crime. They force you to prove you are innocent, instead of what the law say, which is that they have to prove you are guilty. They are corrupt.
1775novten 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Yes, I think the police have lost their way and now in most cases they are not needed. If people would exercise their 2nd Amendment and take their personal and property protection into their own hands, then cops wouldn't be needed in most cases. Just detectives to clear the scene afterwards. Police have become the most dangerous and violent gang in our streets. They have become power-drunk and no longer work for the people.
1775novten 3 months ago 10
@1775novten What the fuck guy are you high? It's called the 4th amendment dumbass. The 4th amendment protects your sorry ass from un-lawful police. It keeps police inline and points out the bad police so they get taken off the street. You take away police and there would be so much destruction and mayhem. Why do you think they were created in the first place hmm??
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@77internationalscout I think you must have me confused with someone else. I never said we should get rid of police entirely - I just think their numbers could be reduced if people took responsibility for themselves. These days, we rely on police to handle every little snivle we have. We expect them to discipline our children and step in when someone calls us a bad name. We are too dependent and need to let them focus on real crimes.
1775novten 1 week ago
@1775novten 'Police have become the most dangerous and violent gang in our streets."
Tht is your statement and is bs my friend. But everything else about snivleing punks and disciplineing our children i agree with.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@77internationalscout In some locations my statement is true. A group of unarmed people that can unleash brutal violence without repercussion is terrifying and is no different than the mafia. The police have the backing of the government and literally get away with murder. I'm sure you've seen countless videos on here of blatant thugs in uniforms terrorizing citizens and subjecting them to brutality. But I know it isn't like that everywhere.
1775novten 1 week ago
@1775novten There are huge repercussions for bad behaving cops, its called getting fired, the 4th amendment protects against unlawful cops and does a pretty damn good job. It make it extremly hard for cops to become out of line. Plus your government statement is false. State police and local cops are funded by the state powers not the Gov. Government controls border patrol and shit.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@77internationalscout There are not huge repercussions for bad cops - getting fired is not a huge repercussions. You would get fired from your job as well if you did something that warranted it. The difference is that if cops commit a crime they just get fired, but if a citizen commits a crime they can get arrested and fired. Are you clear on what government means? I didn't say Federal government.
1775novten 1 week ago
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@77internationalscout Oh I agree with you 100% that cops deal with a lot of bs and people continually call them for the stupidest of reasons. Again, I never said all cops are bad. I also understand the requirements to become a cop, as I was actually in the process of becoming one myself when I got out of the Marine Corps. It may have just been my city, but I decided they didn't do things they way I liked and opted out. I'm sure there are great departments though.
1775novten 1 week ago
@1775novten Coming from the marines like my old man you should have gotten a job being a cop anywhere easy
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@77internationalscout Oh, I could have. I just opted not to, because I didn't like the way my city department handled themselves. I did numerous ride-alongs with numerous different officers and it was always the same complacent "standard routine" attitude. I didn't view them as servants or peace officers. None of them ever tried building relationships with the community - it was always an us against them attitude. Not how I envisioned my service.
1775novten 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@1775novten If a cop fucks up they will not get hired by any other department. There is nothing to fall back on. Are you a cop? Is any of you family members cops? Well i have many in my family who are and i am going to school for criminal justice. Cops get so much shit and all they do is babysit morons and help people. Its bc of 1 or 2 bad cops out of millions that ruin it for other cops. It is extremly hard and you have to be 100% squared away to even consider being a cop.
77internationalscout 1 week ago
@shaobri8 And if it wasn't the police's job, then why when I went to court for the ticket and explained to the judge the situation and what the officer told me (luckily the officer was honest and admitted what he told me), then why did the judge turn to the officer and ask why did the department not report it and enacted safety precautions. Although the judge tried to hide his emotions, you could tell he was upset with the officer. Ticket was dismissed.
1775novten 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Yes, luckily the biker doesn't appear to be injured. But luck doesn't justify the action. Are you saying if the biker would have died that you wouldn't think it was justified? You have to analyze the action, not the result. That cop took that bikers life in his hand - it wasn't worth it. Again, the biker was in the wrong and should be harshly punished, but not with his life.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten The police officer did what he thought was necessary to get this guy off the road before he killed someone. The biker was not going to pull over and he made a risk decision. Would it be bad if the biker died? of course it would but i would rather his life be in danger rather than a innocent bystander. I would rather his life be in danger rather than him having an opportunity to escape. police have seconds to make the decisions and the innocent take priority.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 Even if a biker crashes into a vehicle as full speed, the odds of the passengers being injured are minimal - the odds of the biker killing himself is high. I do realize that officers have seconds to make choices. You often see departments call off chases and let the driver "escape", because they realize the risk of causing an accident is not worth it.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten Its not about the biker hitting someone its about someone avoiding the biker and causing a bigger accident. Someone swerves to avoid the biker and don't see the family walking across the street or gets into a head on collision because he was avoiding the biker. There are a lot of things that could go wrong.
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 So is it a mistake for departments to call off high speed reckless chases? I definitely see your point and maybe if it were a car, I would think it were justified, but I just have a hard time with a patrol car driving head on into a biker's path - knowing that the biker will go flying as a result.
1775novten 3 months ago
@1775novten If a department calls off a chase its because they think it would be to dangerous to pedestrians to continue. Remember the innocent come first. It is not like the cop or the bike were in a high speed chase they were both going at slower speeds, actually the cop stopped in front of the bike and the bike hit the cop. I could see your point if there were greater speeds but they weren't
shaobri8 3 months ago
@shaobri8 The car was not stopped. You can clearly see that the car drove directly into the biker's path - knowing that it would cause the biker to go flying. If that biker wasn't wearing a helmet and leathers, he would have been dead or severely mangled. Do you think the violence the police are using against the Oakland protesters is warranted and justified? Youtube is littered with videos of officers using violence against non violent people.
1775novten 3 months ago
Hot shot cops, if you rammed Police car you would be up for attemped murder but the cops can use their cars to ram you and it's alright. The last part of the video the car was stopped there was no need to ram it. Cowards !!!!
AustinPetDetective 4 months ago
SUCK MY DICK FAGGOTS
80cwyk80 4 months ago
I think most cops think they are playing GTA when they are on duty
0salot 4 months ago
damn and he gets up like a pro.
skaterpops3822 4 months ago
lol yea gta but with those stops people around can still get hurt
Armandomarin8211 4 months ago
Dude, the video looks like someone is playing GTA.
ThunderPower1000 4 months ago
the last one is kind of bullshit, people are going to say that's to disable the car to prevent them from running but the cop went straight for the guy in the passenger seat, its hard to imagine that is policy. I mean cops can shoot out tires, deploy spikes, write the plates down and put an APB out, and investigate the address associated with the DL number. If it is the policy it seems like a bad one, as the benefits to public safety are greatly overshadowed by the potential consequences.
16typesadventures 5 months ago
should be fired.
mica122213 5 months ago
I don't think there's enough footage to judge these as good or bad. There's not enough context. For how long did the chases take place? What were the nature of the crimes? What kind of resistance, if any, took place? They both seem like over reactions to the situations but a few seconds of video hardly tells the whole story.
arstovicek 5 months ago 12
@arstovicek The second one was a bit much though.
jcurry3school 4 months ago
@arstovicek Agreed, the videos are too short to make any assumptions. There are not enough facts to claim these officers were "abusive."
woodynum86x 3 months ago
Nothing wrong here!
crammin23 5 months ago
god video, police do a great job ! tks
marcorodamien 5 months ago
FUK THE POLICE !
ghost1xx2 5 months ago
What a joke the use of lethal force is getting out of control. I need a gun to keep the cops away.
chappygopappy 5 months ago
not wrong, first one to get him stopped, 2nd vid make sure he didnt flea
AIRSOFTINGisAMAZING 5 months ago
how else are you gonna stop him? looks good to me.
ogBIGGINS 5 months ago
HAHAHA that was hilarious maybe this dumb ass should run from the police.... personally I would of hit him from the rear of bike and watch him fish tail the do some flips on the pavement fucker got what he deserved.
asoh229cap 5 months ago
2 cases of Attempted Murder!!!
All people will answer to God for their actions.
Pig cops are not above the law.
PepDawg7171 5 months ago
fuck the cop who hit him
mssnowbunny1220 5 months ago
All I have to say is...that poor bike, I'm sorry you had to have such a bad owner. =(
Bi0 5 months ago
GET ON THE GROUND, EVEN THOUGH YOU HAVE SHOWN NO SIGN OF AGRESSION.
RuneFinity44 5 months ago
@RuneFinity44 Well if he wasn't angry then why did he run? nice caps :)
Lylethe 5 months ago
@Lylethe
All cops rage.
RuneFinity44 5 months ago
the only wrong doing is is that they didn't crash them hard enough! They all still looked pretty fine by me! So, next time, hit the gas, not the brake, ok!?!
periesicsd 5 months ago
It was the right of the suspect to slow down, he didnt, he got hurt.
TheSilentwarrior99 5 months ago
This comment is for "superpornindustry" and "hunkgod" for super u say Chicago sucks your dick? You must have been in boys town... And for Mr hunk. Nothing against being a hardman and nothing against the police. Half my guys are cops and they ride too and they say that this video is BULLSHIT and that was cowardly. Grow some balls...
gtspeed927 5 months ago
@gtspeed927 Oh a hard man. Chicago has cops too and I am sure they would do the same thing. Don't fucking break the law. Its that simple. Either way the cop is gonna kick your little bitch ass.
hunkgod 5 months ago
I paused the video before the second clip but I don't understand what they did wrong in the first one? The guy was clearly speeding away, hit another car, came off the bike, was okay to stand up so they arrested him? No excessive force, just enough to stop him from running off...
I'm not a bitch to the police but I think that sometimes they are made out worse than they are, I was expecting them to do something seriously wrong like beat the guy up or something...
gtfonewfag 5 months ago
You fuck with the bull, your gonna get blasted by a police cruiser!
Pimpsonite 5 months ago
fucking scum, they didnt even check if he was alright, after a serious accident like that he could have been seriously fucked up.
Superhiru 5 months ago
@Superhiru Fuck you are stupid. His ass was well enough to get up and start walking. The safety of the officer is more important, he could have been getting ready to pull a gun out and shoot them. They didn't hit or beat him, just cuffed him. You just need to shut the fuck up with the anti police bitching.
hunkgod 5 months ago
The police is the one making the situation more danger!!!! Fuck them police!!!!!!!!!
leepride651 5 months ago
fucking cops
Dethsing 5 months ago
Those fucktards need to be taught some manners or just drop dead
Dethsing 5 months ago
they thought they wore good.
idiots
MrRellikkiller 5 months ago
10-50 in my state, New Hampshire, is homicide.
Temptant 5 months ago
Comment removed
Temptant 5 months ago
I saw nothing wrong with the videos. Don't run. lol
aust10n2 5 months ago
And this is why missouri has a law that states you are not allowed to pursue anyone on a motorcycle, my uncle died like that.
17dollaz 5 months ago
Excessive use of force...'nuff said.
EHTyrian 5 months ago
he fuckin hit the motorcycle with his car? dumb fuck cop
ACDCoverdose 5 months ago
@ACDCoverdose Actually the guy on the motorcycle hit the cop
MrAlansito1989 5 months ago
no matter how the police or anyone frames this, running from the police should not be punishable by death. Only the courts can decide that.
oldstock1607 5 months ago
God bless America... Just pathetic
nico2710 6 months ago
These people wanted to murder.
GreyEarlTea 6 months ago
Tin badge nazis out of control!
seagoat59 6 months ago
idk whoose right, but ik that jesus christ sucks i hate jesus christ he was dirty lazy and that hair, yech
mistercoolio1997 6 months ago
glad i live in europe....
Timmek247 6 months ago
i want to run people over shoot people tazer people fight people and never get in trouble fuck i wanna be a cop
TheVideoontrial 6 months ago
This is in my state, and yes I know PERSONALLY, that most of our cops are corrupt losers who hide behind a badge and numbers with their backup units
lazarusthehucast 6 months ago
Hiting a motorcycle head on with a car is Attempted murder, plain and simple.
oldstock1607 6 months ago
@oldstock1607 You don't know the whole story. What did this guy do that was so bad that he had to run from the police? Maybe he was wanted for murder, you don't know what he did. It most likely was justifiable, but if it wasn't you're right.. the apartment could have been sued if that subject would have died.
michaelnelson816 6 months ago
@michaelnelson816 if he had been physically seen murdering someone immediately prior to this, or had fired upon police immediately before this happened, I could see this as possibly justifiable. For ANYTHING else it shows a cavalier attitude towards human life.
oldstock1607 6 months ago
@oldstock1607 Watching it again it looked like the trooper who hit him didn't really realise what he did just by looking at the way he approached him.
michaelnelson816 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@oldstock1607 You don't know the whole story. What did this guy do that was so bad that he had to run from the police? Maybe he was wanted for murder, you don't know what he did. It most likely was justifiable, but if it wasn't you're right.. the department could have been sued if that subject would have died.
michaelnelson816 6 months ago
Comment removed
CaptainCocaine 6 months ago
@oldstock1607 Evading police by instigating a high speed chase is attempted murder. Plain and simple. Cops are allowed to shoot a suspect aiming a gun at the public, even if they haven't killed anyone yet. This is that same concept.
CaptainCocaine 6 months ago
Comment removed
oldstock1607 5 months ago
@oldstock1607 Watch the video again. The guy is walking at the end. No murder. You can see the cop pulling away just before turning back in to the guy. It may be possible he did an initial swerve to scare the guy into slowing down, then determined that they were both going slow enough that a collision would most likely not be life-threatening for the motorcyclist. Based on the fact that he stopped within a couple of feet of the collision, you can tell the cop car was barely even moving.
CaptainCocaine 5 months ago
@CaptainCocaine No, the rider didn't die, but he VERY easily could have. I don't know of a person on earth who has been driving for more than a year who doesn't know that striking someone head on with a vehicle--at any speed--while they are travelling towards you at high speed, could possibly end in death. If not death, paralysis or grievous bodily injury are very likely outcomes of such a reprehensible act. There is just no safe way to knock someone off a motorcycle with a car.
oldstock1607 5 months ago
@oldstock1607 There's also no safe way to run from the cops. The motorcyclist must have known that when he tried to evade. He knew the stakes. He made the decision to risk his life.
CaptainCocaine 5 months ago
Hell YA!!!!!
Feltmountainbiker 6 months ago
Hmm motorcycle chase. Best choice? F*ck him up with a car? Real smart decision peice of sh*t cop. F*ck all of these cops im leaving this country and moving to a country where the cops have brains and think before trying to take some ones life.
whyfishnobite 6 months ago
Stop Fucking Talking Like This
Kalphiter45 6 months ago
well it wasn't until the second video
aznlove251misan 6 months ago
gotta love them dirty cop
Video85Man 6 months ago
I don't see any problem with these stops. I mean if you have a unlawful driver, it's best to stop him/her quickly before he/she hurts someone else.
somewhatd 6 months ago 30
@somewhatd i agree totally
dirtyhavoc 6 months ago
@somewhatd It's the cops duty to save as many lives as possible...The first clip was absolutely unacceptable...He could have killed that guy...The second was also ridiculous...The car was stopped no need to injure the guy or yourself by being a complete dumbass and fucking up both cars....These two stops were handled the most costly way possible...Not only did they fuck up the cruisers but the may have gotten hurt... the stupid fucks...
blazehand187 5 months ago
@blazehand187 Cruiser is probably completely fine on the second one, its got bully bars
MasterTaters 5 months ago
@somewhatd He/She was on a motorcycle under those circumstances different precautions should be made... you never know why their running ... shouldnt give them the right to run them over...
suicidesucks08 5 months ago
@somewhatd I am sure that you are an american...at the 1st video you see a bike...the worst thing that can happen to a bike accident is fatal crash of the biker..so that's what they do..at 2nd video..the worst thing that can happen to a stopped(fucking stopped) car is another car hit it..so that's what they do...the guy in the orange car surrended and the fucker crashed him..
georgerelax7302 4 months ago
@georgerelax7302 I agree that the second video was uncalled for; but the first one was done in a orderly and other people safe as possible, the dude in the bike had it coming for him...
fruitychees 4 months ago
@fruitychees I've already answered to that..the worst thing a biker can do is kill himself and that's what the cops are trying to do...and don't start saying that if he hits a clhild and bullshits...noone goes on the street when the cops are chasing..they know how stupid they are..
georgerelax7302 4 months ago