The Truth Behind the AIG Bonuses

[EAE9778]

Michelle Bachmann enjoys seeing herself on TV.

[tomitstube]

she makes a lot of noise, very little substance though. funny how the AIG scandal is now somehow magically a Obama scandal.

bachmans ideology is self promotion at all costs. well, at least she's a voice for disgruntled mcsame-failin losers.

seriously, the "hate the media" hard liners are now quoting CBS. talk about a opportunistic mud slinging hypocrite.

of course Obama can't win. who would be yelling the loudest if Obama just did nothing and the economy collapsed?

[hamshow]

Well said...

[tomitstube]

thanks, it should also be noted the AIG bailout started under bush. AIG was collapsing in sept. of 2008. 152 billion was initially given by the bush administration. so, these bonuses were overlooked by bush. obama inherited this whole mess.

michelle bachman should be put in a "stock". she ignores bush's role in passing this nightmare on. she instead of placing blame on AIG executives, she squarely places all this at the feet of an incoming president.

not a shred of impartiality.

[Kamira1787]

And if you also notice, Sean Hannity seems to have suddenly found the founding fathers too. Whereas during the campaign, he was calling everyone who pointed to the Constitution where it concerned Obama's eligibility as "kooks". Yet tonight, he has Mark Levin on (I do love you, Mark - probably the only true conservative out there who knows what he's talking about). Well I have news for Mr. Hannity and Malkin, the Constitution has been breached. At least Levin had the intelligence to know that.

[Kamira1787]

It's just a disasterous shame that none of these so-called Constitutional-politicians had enough nerve to say something about Obama's eligibility and we have are inexperienced lawyers going after him and why? Because at least they don't seem ashamed to have read the research of their Constitution. I invite Hannity, Malkin and that idiot Ben Smith to go read the constitutional debates and then STFU about "birthers" because it has nothing to do with what's really going on.

[Kamira1787]

i spent 6 months studying one article of the Constitution. No one can tell me that the founding fathers meant for a person born with dual-loyalties, and ADMITS it, to be eligible for the presidency.

Hannity, Malkin and Ben Smith sound as ignorant as Olbermann, Matthews and Maddow.

BUT, they're all going to jump on the Constitutional bandwagon. Why? Because they see people flocking to it, that's the only reason. Not because they actually KNOW what they're talking about.

[Kamira1787]

At least Bachmann knows what she's talking about in the Constitution. There is NO PROVISION that gave them the permission to even give Geithner the authority he has to be bankrupting this country.

And Geithner knows it, too. Only instead of answering that question truthfully, that he was breaking the supreme law of the land, he dumped it back at Congress with a lame, "well you gave me the control, so screw the Constitution", is basically what he was saying. SCREW YOU Geithner!

[Kamira1787]

I don't recall replying to you Sonny. I see me replying to radon, unless you're him too? I never said I like what's going on with Republicans. I was probably the first one in my family to say something was wrong with McCain the sellout and Bush the TARP instigator. All I know is the democrats have turned socialist and I want nothing to do with them. They ARE left-wing kooks!

If you notice the Repub. are on the Constitution bandwagon now. I just wonder how much they actually read of it.

[Kamira1787]

You make statements you don't even qualify with any substantive reasoning whatsoever. Typical rhetoric coming from the left-wing kook crowd.

[zeecee1]

This speech was clear, concise, and brought up everything that needed to be pointed out. Great job Michele.

[radon1234567]

the republican party is finished! Michele Bachmann should join the constitution party. you cant get the rinos out when they control virtually all positions of real power in the party. all those big campaign donors that like big gov. buy off most republicans, its just the way it is. Its time for real conservatives to build up the constitution party and replace the corrupt republican party as the real conservative party.

[Kamira1787]

You're an idiot socialist, radon. There isn't one thing in that video and the others that wasn't true. If anything, it was Bernake and Giethner who lied their asses off and blamed the Congress for giving them the power to destroy the country and that's basically exactly what they said when she asked them what provision in the Constitution gave them that authority to do the damage they did. Constitution party my ass! Try reading your Constitution you pathetic idiot.

[Kamira1787]

Michele Bachamann is one of the handful of the few that even belong to stay in that Congress. The rest of them are nothing but criminals and if you stick up for that, you belong in jail along with them, which I'm sure is coming if this country has any balls left. Of course, it takes a woman to actually see that because they don't think the head in your pants that you and the rest of Congress do.

It's about time to finally see a female in government that speaks MY views as a female, not YOU.

[radon1234567]

kamira1787 are you retarded? I hate socialism, love Michele Bachmann, and hate phony conservative sell out republicans, and have never voted for a democrat! fuck you for attacking me for believing the same as you do! don't be so quick to attack others, get your facts straight first!

[starcatcher7777]

Well done Michele!

You and Newt would make a Great team :

NO MORE RINOs!

[Shelby596]

Oh, boy, I would LOVE for Newt and Bachmann to team up for 2012...I mean, I wouldn't vote for the morons, but I'd love for Obama to get the chance to run against them! WHOO!

[starcatcher7777]

Shelby:

I would too ! Obama would not have a tele-prompters chance or should I say it would be like Obama trying to explain away why his Auntie is still in the USA illegally and where his Birth Certificate is!

[Kamira1787]

I agree on Bachmann running, but I don't agree on Newt for too many reasons to add here.