"If you have someone in charge who has taste, the film will be great" is completely wrong for so many reasons. If this were true, then it would be impossible for directors like Spielberg to make a mediocre film. It would also mean that every single re-released director's cut would be better than the theatrical release (when in reality 99% of them are worse). Obviously it's important to have a tasteful visionary at the helm, but there are many other things to consider as well. This is juvenile.
@jeffdechambeau Thanks for your reply. I understand you don't think highly of him. The Auteur theory is a oft-discussed topic in film, etc. As a marketer and designer, I found the July NYTimes piece on Steve Jobs to be an interesting perspective on organizations and collaboration. Do you have any specific insight on his thesis?
@junkbuddhist He's recognized a structural similarity between how Jobs operates and how movies are made. That's uncontroversial. There are more interesting topics here.
We've moved from movies to computers as the standard medium. What lessons can we draw from the old as we design for the new? What types of visual grammar continue to resonate with people? Why? Why does the auteur approach work here, but less effectively elsewhere?
Instead, this talk is just a long-winded back rub.
@junkbuddhist He's a professional sycophant who's incapable of critical or independent thought. I don't pick on him alone, the fact that he, techcrunch, mashable, or a ton of other pseudojournalists are taken seriously instead of laughed off the stage is a pretty bleak comment on how low our expectations are for news and commentary in one of our most important industries.
Yeah i thought this was circa 1991, until he said Netflix, and I checked the date. Wow. Holy shit Macworld, get that cheesy background out of there. I keep waiting for Super Mario Brothers 3 Competition to kick off.
It's easy to say that something is obvious after you have watched it. I think that, in the context of what Pulse was, this was a great talk. It's a nice finite idea, and he does a good job communicating it.
Is John Gruber an amazing charismatic public speaker? I wouldn't say so. However, that's a lot harder to accomplish than one might think.
If I were to decide, based on this lecture, I'd give you final cut over pretty much everything, John. It was brilliant - some may disagree, but I know I'm right.
"If you have someone in charge who has taste, the film will be great" is completely wrong for so many reasons. If this were true, then it would be impossible for directors like Spielberg to make a mediocre film. It would also mean that every single re-released director's cut would be better than the theatrical release (when in reality 99% of them are worse). Obviously it's important to have a tasteful visionary at the helm, but there are many other things to consider as well. This is juvenile.
msfasa 1 week ago
I didn't think David chase directed the sopranos?
iCgalz 1 month ago
That this man is taken seriously is a damning criticism against us all.
jeffdechambeau 6 months ago
@jeffdechambeau - I'd love to hear you support your claim. I find this a useful conceptual tool when faced with death by committee.
junkbuddhist 5 months ago
Comment removed
jeffdechambeau 5 months ago
@jeffdechambeau Thanks for your reply. I understand you don't think highly of him. The Auteur theory is a oft-discussed topic in film, etc. As a marketer and designer, I found the July NYTimes piece on Steve Jobs to be an interesting perspective on organizations and collaboration. Do you have any specific insight on his thesis?
junkbuddhist 5 months ago
Comment removed
jeffdechambeau 5 months ago
@junkbuddhist He's recognized a structural similarity between how Jobs operates and how movies are made. That's uncontroversial. There are more interesting topics here.
We've moved from movies to computers as the standard medium. What lessons can we draw from the old as we design for the new? What types of visual grammar continue to resonate with people? Why? Why does the auteur approach work here, but less effectively elsewhere?
Instead, this talk is just a long-winded back rub.
jeffdechambeau 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@junkbuddhist He's a professional sycophant who's incapable of critical or independent thought. I don't pick on him alone, the fact that he, techcrunch, mashable, or a ton of other pseudojournalists are taken seriously instead of laughed off the stage is a pretty bleak comment on how low our expectations are for news and commentary in one of our most important industries.
jeffdechambeau 5 months ago
maybe one of the most pedestrian talks ever trying to pass itself off as deep thinking.
rkrr13 6 months ago
This guy is more ponderous than the Titanic. I wonder how he got quoted in NYTimes.
viafCh 6 months ago
insightful
yuratube89 1 year ago
Da grubbbb
fakeheadline 1 year ago
A smart man.
MrSkarstrom 1 year ago
Yeah i thought this was circa 1991, until he said Netflix, and I checked the date. Wow. Holy shit Macworld, get that cheesy background out of there. I keep waiting for Super Mario Brothers 3 Competition to kick off.
wesscoast 2 years ago 5
Deserves a whole of a lot better applause than I'm hearing at the end.
DefSixer 2 years ago 2
Also deserves a lot more laughter than it got! Very funny lines in there went unappreciated.
Thanks, Gruber!
masterbrookr 2 years ago
Comment removed
augustdlr 2 years ago
I liked it. The ideas were very helpful for me. Even though many didn't like his slides I thought they were fine.
svornberg 3 years ago 2
hey john good talk but it's pronounced "oh-ter" (rhymes with "her")
youngnam 3 years ago
or "no fur"
youngnam 3 years ago
this is great
nlex 3 years ago 2
loved the black hiatus at 1:24
gdeleuze1 3 years ago 2
Futura. Of course.
antonyjohnston 3 years ago 6
Good talk. Also, the slides are exactly what I would expect from Gruber.
markegli 3 years ago
Man I love listening to Gruber talk.
phoneunlisted 3 years ago
It's easy to say that something is obvious after you have watched it. I think that, in the context of what Pulse was, this was a great talk. It's a nice finite idea, and he does a good job communicating it.
Is John Gruber an amazing charismatic public speaker? I wouldn't say so. However, that's a lot harder to accomplish than one might think.
bumped 3 years ago 2
If I were to decide, based on this lecture, I'd give you final cut over pretty much everything, John. It was brilliant - some may disagree, but I know I'm right.
Koyder 3 years ago 2
That was wildly obvious and verbose.
jaycoh 3 years ago
very interesting
wayzhack69 3 years ago 3