this is live, seriously guys, true talent does exist lol... IF you REALLY listen to the tempos and his voice rests, you will tell the difference from a studio version to a live version. at 0:23 to 0:28 there is a shorter rest, and he exhales at 0:26 to 0:27, whereas in the studio he rests longer at that particular point and there is a more prominent verbrato in the studio version. also, the ending it sounds like he cut off sooner... but oh well! he is talented!!!
I believe this to be live: if not, someone should shoot the sound technician because the instrumental backing (which does appear to be playback) is overwhelming Vitas' vocal from about 1:25-1:40.
This is not the same vocal as on the official video, though it's strikingly similar. Listen to the way he pronounces the R the first time he sings the name Ester: it's more rolled here, sort of similar to Scottish pronunciation, whereas in the mv the pronunciation is more obviously Russian.
i'm certain this is playback. at one point, i thought he was using a mix of playback + live singing, but i don't believe this is the case. i checked the sound bite you mentioned; in the official video, that part is noticeably softer than the rest of the vocals. the sound system + audio recording quality probably produced a more distorted sound, causing the vocals to appear more muffled than in the official video. i really do hope to see/hear him sing this song truly live one day!
Granted it is difficult to compare an amateur recording like this with a studio recording (and doing so hurts my head!), but I don't believe distortion could possibly produce the difference I described: furthermore, in the last "Ester" (approx 0:37 here/ 1:05 MV) the R sounds slightly breathier here and more rolled in the mv, i.e. the the difference is the OTHER WAY AROUND from the first one, which would not happen were it a characteristic of the sound recording.
P.S. There is also a very slight timing mismatch in the vibrato on the first syllable of "nemici" (approx 0:54 here/ 1:22 MV), and the ending is different here. I cannot swear this is live: I wasn't there (though I suspect whoever filmed this was probably close enough to be able to tell), but I will swear this is NOT the same vocal as in the official video, and I stand by my assertion that if the vocal here is playback then the sound technician wants shot (or at least his/ her arse kicked!)
I replied to this video (rather than to the multitude of broadcast footage available) is because you are the first one to have a convincing argument. Perhaps I can go back to my theory that this performance is a mix of playback + live vocals. The similarities in all his performances of JUST this song are too strong to ignore. He never "proves" to us he's singing this song (never pulls his mic away), as he has for every other song. That alone is suspicious.
I've found performances of songs where he does do that with the microphone to be strikingly similar too: the consistency of his performances seems incredible but I think he really is that good. You have a point though, he never seems to use this song (or Dedication) to prove he's singing live as he does with other challenging songs. Maybe he just thinks it would spoil these too much, but I think it does spoil some of his performances a bit as it is. It's a shame he feels the need to do that.
I agree with you! Pulling the microphone away DOES spoil the song. I find myself saying, "Just sing, man, sing! I believe you; it's real!" It's just to me that when he's "clearly" live, the timbre of his voice is different than when it "seems" he's miming. But who really knows? He could be just that good. We're so spammy. ;)
If he's miming this song, I'm okay with that. He makes each performance interesting to watch; I would still pay to see him lip sync. It would help if they didn't play the exact backing track from the video. In fact, I'd think it would be pretty kickass if he just did a snippet of this song a capella (check out his a capella snippet, keywords "improvised Ave Maria"). Glad to know we're all obsessed with him, lip syncing or not. :)
I can just about deal with musicians miming on TV (though I'd rather they didn't), but if I went to a concert and caught the singer lip-synching I'd feel a bit cheated. Mind you, what usually happens if a singer is having problems with his voice is the audience will help out with the singing but that would be difficult with a song like this! Vitas is so awesome that if I heard him perform just one song live I'd consider that to be worth the price of a concert ticket.
ya i realized it was a playback too...im sure he is capable of singing this live though, cuz i heard some of his REAL live performances. he probably just realized this song is too difficult to sing live so many times. i still got complete respect for him.
yes it is playback.. I LOVE vitas but these performances ARE synced.. i dropped the three "live performances" of this i could find into sonar and protools and it all matches up EXACTLY.. As good as he is there is no reason for it though..i have heard him do actual "live" performances..strange.
Is an accurate digital analysis actually possible from low-quality amateur sound recording like this?
This version /watch?v=zlNmQZAmk1o seems to have more vibrato on the last sylllable of the word "nemici" about 0:57 in above clip/ 1:54 on the other one.
because it sounds tooooo much exacly like the original song and NO TRUE-LIVE SONG SOUNDS EXACLY LIKE THE ORIGINAL ONES thats a scientific fact, darling
if singing is just like talking, wouldn't they be the same? if your tone of talking are the same, wouldn't make it the same if you use the same pitch, darling?
"Your voice is subject to the effects of your emotions, eating and sleeping habits, use of medication and drugs, and speaking"
-Anne Peckham
what i mean when i said "singing is just like talking" is that the sound of your voice while singing is affected by the same voice when speaking coz the sound of any voice is produced in the same way, thats why it recomend that ones you "warm-up" you MUST to be quiet, darling ;)
Not a single thing is different from him singing it in the videos or anything. Same notes, same vibrato, same everything. This sounds TOO perfect for it not to be playback. Singing and talking are NOT the same. Even the best opera singers sound different in each performance. Vitas does not.
it just that...its has the same synth effects, the same arrangements of the original song, the same "echo"...this is definetly playback and at least that Vitas himself proves me that it wasnt playback (thing that i know it will never happen :P...kiddin) i will not beleave that he was truly singing, ok, its my opinion...period!
Jesi, that depends on the microphone, and I don't know if he even uses the same one for a whole concert or if he changes mics when he wants different effects. He's not using the same kind you'd find at the pub karaoke anyway.
no way, he can't move the microphone so fast without making a terrible noise and still his voice can be heard perfectly... it seems a little bit lip synching, but I might be wrong... I don't understand why he adds that horrible re verb that changes his voice...
Just one thing, live band doesn't mean live singing. Vitas always uses live band to prove he doesn't lip sync but he does. He doesn't have to do this...I think he can sing well in live
He doesn't always have to sing with a live band all the time! it is a little different from the cd version. he's just been trained so well it doesn't take that much effort for him do to do this. I have a lot of his stuff on DVD and I can see in plain detail that its all real. they do use re verb on the mic most of the time because it makes his voice sound bigger. Thats only normal.
It's him, in the original song, the part when the violins start to become more "pop-like" it's alot louder and it's sung very quiet in comparison to the music in this video, that and you can tell it's him by the pronounciation (sp?) of a single part of the song in comparison to the actual music video, or on his album.
By far the best live performer I've heard of. Go look up a few other of his live performances, you'll know what I mean.
Yes, that is falsetto for a countertenor or male soprano. He has incredible range - I think it's about a 6-7 octave scale. He has been doubted on other sites. This is not playback or voiced over...the microphone technician just set a reverb to give his voice a richer sound...majority of singers do that. You can see this comes from the diaphragm.
Vocal track.
Damn, that sucks I thought for sure he had the stuff to do this live.
charvelgtrs 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
playback!
fake
either that or someone kicked him in the nuts or he had a sex change.
moffrey21 2 years ago
You need to do some homework to know about who he is. I've been to his live show. He is amazing.
roughjc 2 years ago
no not fake. if you think so check this on youtube Vitas Opera 2 歌劇2 - Live at Guangzhou China Concert 2007
YouShouldBeMyFriend 2 years ago
playbaaaaack!!!
munelani 2 years ago
this is live, seriously guys, true talent does exist lol... IF you REALLY listen to the tempos and his voice rests, you will tell the difference from a studio version to a live version. at 0:23 to 0:28 there is a shorter rest, and he exhales at 0:26 to 0:27, whereas in the studio he rests longer at that particular point and there is a more prominent verbrato in the studio version. also, the ending it sounds like he cut off sooner... but oh well! he is talented!!!
robertbrown1988 2 years ago
I have this concert, and this was the first song he sang and it was not live, it was a playback and the rest of the songs live
Lorenian 2 years ago
I believe this to be live: if not, someone should shoot the sound technician because the instrumental backing (which does appear to be playback) is overwhelming Vitas' vocal from about 1:25-1:40.
This is not the same vocal as on the official video, though it's strikingly similar. Listen to the way he pronounces the R the first time he sings the name Ester: it's more rolled here, sort of similar to Scottish pronunciation, whereas in the mv the pronunciation is more obviously Russian.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
i'm certain this is playback. at one point, i thought he was using a mix of playback + live singing, but i don't believe this is the case. i checked the sound bite you mentioned; in the official video, that part is noticeably softer than the rest of the vocals. the sound system + audio recording quality probably produced a more distorted sound, causing the vocals to appear more muffled than in the official video. i really do hope to see/hear him sing this song truly live one day!
anrina 2 years ago
Granted it is difficult to compare an amateur recording like this with a studio recording (and doing so hurts my head!), but I don't believe distortion could possibly produce the difference I described: furthermore, in the last "Ester" (approx 0:37 here/ 1:05 MV) the R sounds slightly breathier here and more rolled in the mv, i.e. the the difference is the OTHER WAY AROUND from the first one, which would not happen were it a characteristic of the sound recording.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
P.S. There is also a very slight timing mismatch in the vibrato on the first syllable of "nemici" (approx 0:54 here/ 1:22 MV), and the ending is different here. I cannot swear this is live: I wasn't there (though I suspect whoever filmed this was probably close enough to be able to tell), but I will swear this is NOT the same vocal as in the official video, and I stand by my assertion that if the vocal here is playback then the sound technician wants shot (or at least his/ her arse kicked!)
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
I replied to this video (rather than to the multitude of broadcast footage available) is because you are the first one to have a convincing argument. Perhaps I can go back to my theory that this performance is a mix of playback + live vocals. The similarities in all his performances of JUST this song are too strong to ignore. He never "proves" to us he's singing this song (never pulls his mic away), as he has for every other song. That alone is suspicious.
anrina 2 years ago
I've found performances of songs where he does do that with the microphone to be strikingly similar too: the consistency of his performances seems incredible but I think he really is that good. You have a point though, he never seems to use this song (or Dedication) to prove he's singing live as he does with other challenging songs. Maybe he just thinks it would spoil these too much, but I think it does spoil some of his performances a bit as it is. It's a shame he feels the need to do that.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
I agree with you! Pulling the microphone away DOES spoil the song. I find myself saying, "Just sing, man, sing! I believe you; it's real!" It's just to me that when he's "clearly" live, the timbre of his voice is different than when it "seems" he's miming. But who really knows? He could be just that good. We're so spammy. ;)
anrina 2 years ago 2
If he's miming this song, I'm okay with that. He makes each performance interesting to watch; I would still pay to see him lip sync. It would help if they didn't play the exact backing track from the video. In fact, I'd think it would be pretty kickass if he just did a snippet of this song a capella (check out his a capella snippet, keywords "improvised Ave Maria"). Glad to know we're all obsessed with him, lip syncing or not. :)
anrina 2 years ago
Yep, I'm obsessed!
I can just about deal with musicians miming on TV (though I'd rather they didn't), but if I went to a concert and caught the singer lip-synching I'd feel a bit cheated. Mind you, what usually happens if a singer is having problems with his voice is the audience will help out with the singing but that would be difficult with a song like this! Vitas is so awesome that if I heard him perform just one song live I'd consider that to be worth the price of a concert ticket.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
What I'd REALLY like to see is Vitas playing a small venue and singing this completely unamplified.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago 2
the mixed thing is possible
even mariah carey does that sometimes. listen to "cant take that away from me" version on the net
the hardest part are lip sync the rest live
amdnovello 2 years ago
super
tojadorka 2 years ago
ya i realized it was a playback too...im sure he is capable of singing this live though, cuz i heard some of his REAL live performances. he probably just realized this song is too difficult to sing live so many times. i still got complete respect for him.
CIassicalGuitar 3 years ago
He's doing the robot lol
jellyguy96 3 years ago
yes it is playback.. I LOVE vitas but these performances ARE synced.. i dropped the three "live performances" of this i could find into sonar and protools and it all matches up EXACTLY.. As good as he is there is no reason for it though..i have heard him do actual "live" performances..strange.
akedo1 3 years ago
Is an accurate digital analysis actually possible from low-quality amateur sound recording like this?
This version /watch?v=zlNmQZAmk1o seems to have more vibrato on the last sylllable of the word "nemici" about 0:57 in above clip/ 1:54 on the other one.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
i wonder where the violiners are 0.0
homoplayer 3 years ago
oh no,the rock pictures.
katharinetian 3 years ago
and he looks toooo much relaxed too
kukasmonster 3 years ago
playback, again!? sorry but this is the 2nd video of this song played "live", and both are playback!?
kukasmonster 3 years ago
How do you even know if it is playback?
CutieKala 3 years ago
because it sounds tooooo much exacly like the original song and NO TRUE-LIVE SONG SOUNDS EXACLY LIKE THE ORIGINAL ONES thats a scientific fact, darling
kukasmonster 3 years ago 2
if singing is just like talking, wouldn't they be the same? if your tone of talking are the same, wouldn't make it the same if you use the same pitch, darling?
buster95 3 years ago
it came from talking:
"Your voice is subject to the effects of your emotions, eating and sleeping habits, use of medication and drugs, and speaking"
-Anne Peckham
what i mean when i said "singing is just like talking" is that the sound of your voice while singing is affected by the same voice when speaking coz the sound of any voice is produced in the same way, thats why it recomend that ones you "warm-up" you MUST to be quiet, darling ;)
kukasmonster 3 years ago
Not a single thing is different from him singing it in the videos or anything. Same notes, same vibrato, same everything. This sounds TOO perfect for it not to be playback. Singing and talking are NOT the same. Even the best opera singers sound different in each performance. Vitas does not.
RoyalGuard503 3 years ago
it just that...its has the same synth effects, the same arrangements of the original song, the same "echo"...this is definetly playback and at least that Vitas himself proves me that it wasnt playback (thing that i know it will never happen :P...kiddin) i will not beleave that he was truly singing, ok, its my opinion...period!
kukasmonster 3 years ago
In addition to whats been said but, the way he keeps moving that mic around...the sound shouldn't be so consistant....
jesi2290 3 years ago
Jesi, that depends on the microphone, and I don't know if he even uses the same one for a whole concert or if he changes mics when he wants different effects. He's not using the same kind you'd find at the pub karaoke anyway.
SnowSunbather 2 years ago
it's not a play back the part where he stops around 1:10 the silence there is too short and plus i was there ==
homoplayer 3 years ago
Man, he can sing damn well but he looks like a dancing sim when he tries to dance.
KhufuKhafreMenkaure 4 years ago
um...though I do love him very much, I still have to suspect that he did not singing on LIVE...
roxanneli 4 years ago 2
when i listen to him. i think of angles´s voice... the same! his voice is sooo perfect!
soledadsoso 4 years ago 4
i deeply love Vitas, perfect vioce!
myvitas 4 years ago
i totally agree on that HE CANT DANCE
but hes cute and a good singer hehe
amosfang 4 years ago
because he is russian (latvian), so he is snubbed by european and american organizers and listeners. he is aso very popular in israel.
believe me he doesn't need lip synching, but i can believe that his manager forces him to do it, because some passes in their contract.
babajaga39 4 years ago
no way, he can't move the microphone so fast without making a terrible noise and still his voice can be heard perfectly... it seems a little bit lip synching, but I might be wrong... I don't understand why he adds that horrible re verb that changes his voice...
igottafindpeace 4 years ago
Just one thing, live band doesn't mean live singing. Vitas always uses live band to prove he doesn't lip sync but he does. He doesn't have to do this...I think he can sing well in live
annathegirl622 4 years ago
sweet LIVE version ( it is live cause you hear the squell from the reverb and hitting the back walss and coming back )
CoryM2008 4 years ago
Hahahaha. Anyone else notice he can't dance?
Elvoalven 4 years ago
well, assuming he can't dance, that must be the only thing he can NOT do!
linmorwen 4 years ago
Exactly! Wait.. assuming????
Elvoalven 4 years ago
LOL
linmorwen 4 years ago
He doesn't always have to sing with a live band all the time! it is a little different from the cd version. he's just been trained so well it doesn't take that much effort for him do to do this. I have a lot of his stuff on DVD and I can see in plain detail that its all real. they do use re verb on the mic most of the time because it makes his voice sound bigger. Thats only normal.
KattieKakes706 4 years ago
Its not live its incredible his voice and music is same with his video clip.ı cant see any orchestra or any maestro cmoon this is Lucia Di Lammermoor
idemeneo 4 years ago
Not conviced it's live.
GoldenDuckson 4 years ago
You can tell when he's not.
I love his expressions as he hits the high notes. Priceless.
ThaddeusTheThird 4 years ago
I love how people always assume he's lip synching.
AndiTheCorinthian 4 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
it's true
listen to all other versions here on youtube
always the same song
it's not possible to do it with nothing different
lip sync obvious
amdnovello 2 years ago
Totally right.
kharlitoz 2 years ago 2
thx
amdnovello 2 years ago
It's him, in the original song, the part when the violins start to become more "pop-like" it's alot louder and it's sung very quiet in comparison to the music in this video, that and you can tell it's him by the pronounciation (sp?) of a single part of the song in comparison to the actual music video, or on his album.
By far the best live performer I've heard of. Go look up a few other of his live performances, you'll know what I mean.
Forkeh 4 years ago
Hummm...I love him but I'm not certain if this was live or not...I doubt.
wilhelmlds 4 years ago
OMG, you cant imagine what I'd give to be there!! T_T
steff7777777 4 years ago
i think it's playback afterall
amdnovello 4 years ago
i don't understand if that's falsetto or not
amdnovello 4 years ago
Yes, that is falsetto for a countertenor or male soprano. He has incredible range - I think it's about a 6-7 octave scale. He has been doubted on other sites. This is not playback or voiced over...the microphone technician just set a reverb to give his voice a richer sound...majority of singers do that. You can see this comes from the diaphragm.
KakoiDedikuSan 4 years ago
He is a god of pitch ranges. ;w;
KamunouHyena 5 years ago
well really you cant tell if his natural range is good or not from this song, he just has a ridonkulously strong head voice/falsetto.
LaserViking 4 years ago
i guess you're right. anyone has some video with him going very high? like the last note of the "il dolce suono" sang by callas?
amdnovello 4 years ago
Holy crap. First. No freaking way. O__O
JLPDYC 5 years ago