Added: 2 months ago
From: blackacidlizzard
Views: 374
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (38)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • ALTHOUGH I'M A CONSERVATIVE CHRISTIAN (Baptist), I no longer believe that the Bible teaches eternal torment or suffering. The Bible teaches eternal punishment, but it's not eternal torment. In my popular Internet article, TRADITIONAL DOCTRINE OF HELL EVOLVED FROM GREEK ROOTS, I explain how and why teaching of eternal torment entered early into Christianity and how Scriptures have been misinterpreted and taken out of context to support that teaching. ~Babu G. Ranganathan (B.A. theology/biology)

  • SCIENCE SHOWS THAT THE UNIVERSE could not have sustained itself eternally because of entropy (even in an open system). Einstein confirmed that space, matter, and time had a beginning! That beginning had to be supernatural because natural laws have no ability to bring the universe into existence from nothing. The supernatural cannot be proved by science but science points to a supernatural intelligence for the origin and order of the universe ~ HOW FORENSIC SCIENCE REFUTES ATHEISM (Article)

  • @Mogley52

    When you're even worse at philosophy than Richard Dawkins, when you make logical errors so blatant that even the average liberal arts major can spot them, it is impossible that you will have anything to contribute

  • EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. That's why space and time can be altered by gravity, and space produces particles. Einstein's equations show that the universe couldn’t be eternal. It had a beginning. Einstein believed, because of science, in the existence of God behind the origin and order of the universe. He didn't believe in a personal God like Christians do, but he did believe science pointed to the existence of an all powerful and intelligent Creator

  • @Mogley52

    "EINSTEIN CONFIRMED that space and time are just as physical as matter. "

    lol... this ive gotta hear.

  • NATURAL LIMITS TO EVOLUTION: Only evolution within "kinds" is genetically possible (i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.), but not evolution across "kinds" (i.e. from worm to human). How did species survive if their vital tissues, organs, reproductive systems were still evolving? Read my Pravda Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS! I discuss: Punctuated Equilibrium, "Junk DNA," genetics, mutations, natural selection, fossils, genetic and biological similarities between species.

  • ALL REAL EVOLUTION ( i.e. varieties of dogs, cats, etc.) in nature is the expression, over time, of already existing genes. Evolution is possible only if there’s information (genes) directing it. Only variations of already existing genes are possible, which means only limited evolution and adaptations are possible. Nature has no ability to invent new genes via random mutations caused by random environmental forces. That’s evolutionary faith, not science. Read my article, WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

  • IMAGINE A FISH WITH PART FINS, part feet with the fins evolving (transitioning) into feet. What survival benefit would there be? The fish couldn't use its fins or its feet, and there are no fossils showing such a creature ever existed. They only exist on automobile bumper stickers! There are no true transitional forms, either living or fossilized. Evolutionists realize this fact! Read my Internet article: WAR AMONG EVOLUTIONISTS!

  • APES ARE QUITE COMFORTABLE IN HOW THEY WALK, just as humans are quite comfortable in how they walk. Even a slight change in the position of a muscle or bone, for either, would be excruciatingly painful and would not be an advantage for survival. There's no hard evidence that humans evolved from ape-like creatures anymore than there's hard evidence that apes evolved from four-legged-pawed dog-like creatures. Read Internet article: MISSING LINKS THAT NEVER WERE.

  • EXPLAINING HOW AN AIRPLANE WORKS doesn't mean no one made the airplane. Explaining how life or the universe works doesn't mean there was no Maker behind them. Natural laws explain how the order in the universe works, but mere undirected natural laws can't explain the origin of that order. Once you have a complete, living cell then the genetic code/mechanisms exist to direct the formation of more cells, but how did the cell naturally originate when no directing code/mechanisms existed in nature?

  • but, you are dealing with creationists. not stupid, ignorant. perhaps willfully. most likely wilful ignorance, but not stupid.

    ignorant.

    maybe stupid...

  • Good vid, iI guess, but this idea that people are stupid: stupid compared to what?

    If we go with humanity is 'stupid', then there is no such thing as 'smart'. What is smarter than people? Is it some abstract human concept? Concept better than human concept?

    Is humanity is smarter than humanity, or do you(people calling humanity dumb) think that you are smarter than humanity?

    Just something that's been itching me.

  • @Cailwyn

    It is quite possibly because I am uncreative at the moment, but I can only think of two natural unstated points of comparison: a baseline aggregate measure, or oneself. As the comparison is TO the former, that only leaves the latter as the unstated contrast.

    Sectors of humanity are smarter than the average human. I honestly thought this was such an obvious truth that it never needed to be stated, but that was before I paid attention to arguments about race.

  • No birds with gills argument is easily argued to futility. The answer is, birds have feet, people have feet. Reptiles have 4 limbs mammals have 4 limbs. Humans have tail bones, other animals have tail bones. There are salamanders with gills. Species don't change often, but we have witnessed it in the fossil record, Ambulocetus to Whale. Fish to Amphibians is another special change observed in the fossil record. Species change is mostly caused by an extreme change in the environment.

  • Well, just as with the fish to frog evolution, this suggestion by the dipshit betrays a basic lack of knowledge of evolutionary theory.

    What is indicated by the fossil record is that birds evolved from dinosaurs. Dinosaurs were not amphibious.

    It's just another crocoduck - the branches known do not even slightly coincide with the random babbling this fuck spews.

    And, as intercourseman pointed out, if there was a gilled bird, dipshit WOULD consider that animal "complete"

  • @blackacidlizzard

    If you google this search:

    Fish to Amphibian Transition Tufts

    The top link should be to a web page that shows and describes a few transitionary life forms, the first fish with hands and the first fish with legs, the first amphibian with functional legs and so on. All the challenges uneducated people put to evolution have generally already been answered by fossil discovery.

  • If you know the facts of evolution, evolution is irrefutable. The fossil record shows transitions from every being type to some similar being type across billions of years of fossils collected. The first fish that had a hand that became the standard hand for a while for instance. Whales having evolved from Ambulocetus, a water dwelling massive mammal similar to a Capybara. That's how mammals came to live in the ocean.

  • I dig your music, but it's good to hear you talk about this stuff.

  • I think god is an engineer, because he did a great job designing us but did no documentation.

    - Don McMillan.

  • That picture is filled with ironic hilarity. The first being the caption at the top. From a evolutionists view it pokes fun at creationists. That always makes me laugh. But from a logical view, this ape made his own patterned clothing and dressed himself... Finally, if they all evolved from one another how is it that the man is speaking to them all? :)

  • @ThisMemory

    You have a very literal mind. And, by the standard of the old-school "chain of being" understanding, my speaking to you is merely a difference of degree from the literal interpretation of this picture.

  • @blackacidlizzard That was called a clever obvservation. Obviously I know the intintional meaning of this depiction.

  • as far as I know, the appendix in humans plays an important role in our immune systems. It's sort of an ingrained concept that the appendix is entirely vestigial, along with the tonsils. They are important and helpful, but not necessary.

    The appendix in the testis as well as other parts of the body, I think, actually are completely vestigial.

  • @intercourseman69

    I guess i stand corrected on the appendix, but really, I would say that the same would be said for a bird with gills - it isn't "needed" but it could add a slight advantage.

  • @blackacidlizzard

    especially birds that dive at water for fish. That would add more than a slight advantage, though.

  • 2011, and creationism debunking is still an ongoing trend?

    There is just no end to their stupidity.

  • @BloodBoner

    as long as we have people like this

    watch?v=AcOgTVwjzkc

    It will never get old

  • Oh noes! Creationists making claims against me!!!!

    More anti-communist and anti-diversity videos please.

  • @SheyOneTen

    Dude, I don't care if you like anti-theist videos any more than I care if my libertarian viewers like my anti-multiracialism videos. If you just want stereotype/party-line WN/NS material, there are plenty of places to go. This channel is not one of them :)

  • @blackacidlizzard I don't know where you got "stereotype/party-line" from, and I'm not really interested in NS material.

    And fuck me for requesting things I find interesting and relevant to my life.

  • @SheyOneTen

    Just saying that the material on this channel is an eclectic assortment of my interests, from poorly played music covers, to shitty poetry, to rambling talks on any topic which momentarily catches my eye for whatever reason :)

  • London butterflies.

    Since Darwin, black butterflies that can hide on polluted (black) trees have evolved. And even since the Clean Air act of 1956 they have declined as trees became free of soot again. Evolution in our streets for all to see.

  • @calmreason

    Yeah, but this dude uses "species" the same way Ray Comfort uses "kind"

    :-/

  • Your link is broken.

  • @DKshad0w

    Thanks.

    Fixed.

  • The lungfish.

    Checkmate.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more