@zamyrabyrd What difference does it make if there's a version for harp? He's playing the piano, and he's not obliged to make the piano sound like a harp. To me, this is an hommage to Grieg's Holberg Suite, the Prelude of that, and the harp arrangement was an afterthought because of the figuration.
This is a great pianist, a man who knew Prokofiev. If he doesn't know how to 'nuance' it, who does? Grow up. And who gives a shit about a bum note! You should all be grateful.
I had a student of mine learn this piece for her recital last year - I showed her this video to demonstrate how NOT to interpret this piece. Too brutal, no nuance. I respect Gilels and his technique, but not everything is about playing a piece as fast as possible. I think he rolled out of the wrong side of bed that morning.......
Very strange interpretation of a harp song, but the playing has Gilels written all over it so I can't really dislike it too much. As human as he may be, his technique is still pretty damn godly.
yuch! no tenderness! certainly no harp. Speed speed speed. and that 2nd section!!!! gross! atrociously harsh. everyone on youtube is racing to play this 2:30! i wish someone had the nerve to just let the piece take its time.
@fbiberkopfklavier I agree that modern pianists rely too much on speed but Gilels, unlike others, uses speed not to show off but for purely expressive purposes. I think it works here.
Obviously an excellent pianist, although, it doesn't seem very 'harpy' or delicate and celestial. The recording of Prokofiev playing this is wonderful.
@Martel211996 did it ever crossed your mind that there wasn't a camera at the level of the keyboard and that from this angle the cameraman couldn't film his hands unless he raised them?
@martimtavares Has it crossed your mind that in other clips of the same concert that was great footage of his hands, which means there were cameras at that level of the keyboard you sarcastic shit?
Don't forget. Emil Gilels is human. So whatever may have sparked this performance is partly controlled by his spontaneous and momentary thought process. No one is perfect. But the man was a masterful musician and pianist, and had definitely thought thoroughly about his approach towards many compositions.
I like all of the insight you all put into your comments, each one of you. That goes for the ones who favor this performance, and the ones who do not. But all of you are basing your opinion open the score. While Gilels based it on the man. The man being Prokofiev.
That is true. I am currently working with a student of Neuhaus, and when it comes to certain composers such as Prokofiev, she would give specific instruction (not on the page) of how it should be interpreted- based on the sources she obtained from working with those close to the composer, or readings.
In general, being an honest musician doesn't only mean to read the score with extreme sensitivity but to do research on the composer's personal notes, books, conversations, etc.
A very stupid performance by a professional who should know better. There is ONE half-measure marked "forte" in the printed score. The rest of the piece ranges from mezzo-piano to pianissimo, and the general directions are "vivo e delicato." Gilels's middle section fortissimos are asinine.
Very little expression; a brittle performance by a pianist who is obviously bored by the piece. Some of the kids on YouTube play the piece much better. Listen ot a few of them.
To level such words as you do at one of the greatest pianists of the 20th century, and an acknowledged Prokofiev specialist, is simply indefensible. It is a prerogative of musicians of this caliber to choose to interpret the composer's musical ideas in ways that differ from the ones suggested by the composer. Your inability to grasp this simple truth makes you the asinine one here, as does your adherence to the simplistic category of "expression"
I agree with scooterbarf completely. And I don't think much of Prokofiev's music is supposed to be aggressive--spirited, angular, maybe, but not an outlet or channel for the performer's anger and/or frustration.
well, I played it years ago and have a distinct recollection that it does not pose any extraordinary difficulties. maybe except that one's right hand gets tired after repeating the same figure for about two minutes, and the glissandi made my fingers sore... outside that, it's really basic stuff
Exactly the same, i had to play the glissando on my nail because i had to learn it in two weeks so took all the finger off of my thumb. I was told the tendons in my right hand looked scary when performing it.
Wow, its amazing! Im trying play this and Id like to play it on my graduating concert, but Im worried when I watch this video... =) But I really loooove it! Perfect!
a couple of days ago i was lunching with my ex-soviet defense establishment friend (i'm american) and i pronounced 'gilels' with a soft 'g' instead of hard, and she didn't immediately understand whom i meant.
she said she'd been educated to consider richter the best pianist, then gilels. she'd never heard of lazar berman.
this is a very well educated and smart woman, fwiw.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
I last watched this a month ago. I used to think it was beautiful, but now, when he plays it, it sounds too dull. No offense, Giles, but it just does.
you are perfect at this!
MsIlovepie123456789 2 weeks ago
This is the way music should be experienced, in all its sponteneity. What a beutiful moment.
Contrafactum 1 month ago
I love Gilels!!!
sugarve 2 months ago
Maybe he went to the bathroom, ors slept and woke with the clapping.
gkollias14 2 months ago
Wonderful.
vortex481 5 months ago in playlist More videos from KlassikFan2007
He play it's terrible! Gilels plays etude and not PRELUDE. This prelude is a very delicate. Prokofiev plays this prelude the best.
timurgran 8 months ago
@timurgran It's a different interpretation. Don't hate.
Mockatt 7 months ago
@timurgran Agreed, the middle section is particularly aggressive here, not like a harp at all.
zamyrabyrd 1 month ago in playlist gilel + prokofiev
@zamyrabyrd What difference does it make if there's a version for harp? He's playing the piano, and he's not obliged to make the piano sound like a harp. To me, this is an hommage to Grieg's Holberg Suite, the Prelude of that, and the harp arrangement was an afterthought because of the figuration.
andrewfinch1066 1 month ago
Sofronitsky plays it much better
ningus1 8 months ago
so beautiful!! Great Prokofiev!
Liduniya 9 months ago
I'm learning to play this piece, I hope I can just play as half good as him! Absolutely amazing, his fingers are so fast.
lmq0209 10 months ago
This reawakens dreams and memories from when I was a child that I don't even know if they happened, but I remember them like it was yesterday! :)
MsThisNameIsTaken 11 months ago
Comment removed
MsThisNameIsTaken 11 months ago
This is a great pianist, a man who knew Prokofiev. If he doesn't know how to 'nuance' it, who does? Grow up. And who gives a shit about a bum note! You should all be grateful.
nathanscottly 11 months ago 5
I had a student of mine learn this piece for her recital last year - I showed her this video to demonstrate how NOT to interpret this piece. Too brutal, no nuance. I respect Gilels and his technique, but not everything is about playing a piece as fast as possible. I think he rolled out of the wrong side of bed that morning.......
muso775 1 year ago
Haha, around 0:42, Gilels play G+A accidentally instead of G, but overall it's awesome!
Buckley153 1 year ago
Who needs a glissando when you can play scales as fast as Gilels? O_O
chubbysenator 1 year ago
thanks for showing us his hands...
eyeSwim4life 1 year ago
How many pieces did he play in the same concert?????
It's amazing!
sissichopin91 1 year ago
ce live recital de Gilels est tres intense. On voit qu il donne tout, il engage son coeur ce qui est rare.....
uhartchristian 1 year ago
Wow, 6 ppl pressed the wrong button!
0123452576 1 year ago
@0123452576 actually 9 people's hands slipped by the awesomeness
D3monHAX0R 1 year ago
Very strange interpretation of a harp song, but the playing has Gilels written all over it so I can't really dislike it too much. As human as he may be, his technique is still pretty damn godly.
tegrenath 1 year ago
yuch! no tenderness! certainly no harp. Speed speed speed. and that 2nd section!!!! gross! atrociously harsh. everyone on youtube is racing to play this 2:30! i wish someone had the nerve to just let the piece take its time.
fbiberkopfklavier 1 year ago
@fbiberkopfklavier I agree that modern pianists rely too much on speed but Gilels, unlike others, uses speed not to show off but for purely expressive purposes. I think it works here.
CDU916 1 year ago
Obviously an excellent pianist, although, it doesn't seem very 'harpy' or delicate and celestial. The recording of Prokofiev playing this is wonderful.
jakaroo94 1 year ago
camera man is retarded. Did he forget that a pianist has hands to?
Martel211996 1 year ago 53
@Martel211996 did it ever crossed your mind that there wasn't a camera at the level of the keyboard and that from this angle the cameraman couldn't film his hands unless he raised them?
martimtavares 3 months ago
@martimtavares Has it crossed your mind that in other clips of the same concert that was great footage of his hands, which means there were cameras at that level of the keyboard you sarcastic shit?
Martel211996 3 months ago
@martimtavares vê lá se te acalmas ó paneleiro cara de cu. ainda por cima não tens razão.
martimtavares 3 months ago
wat list is this in? i need it for a grd 10 exam
Lilhugsz 1 year ago
@Lilhugsz I'm assuming RCM; List E. Search it up yourself later, or else you'll fail in life. Also, LERN2SPEIL gosh >_>
Mushyrulez 1 year ago
i noticed a little finger crunch at the near end of 0:44 secs.. other than that this was truly a wonderful performance. lovely!
leungj69 1 year ago
sofiashevtzov@gmail.com
arnonerez 1 year ago
I'm learning this... thanks for uploading, to play it like this is certainly something to aim for! =]
samuelpearce2010 1 year ago
Gilels was, er, was um.....SOLID !!
mradipatti 1 year ago
awsome !!! it's fucking crazy man !!!
regisgouveia 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
What a nerd.
MyFireFoxx 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Quite an amusing comment - you old miserable old sod
ilkinond 2 years ago
Comment removed
music2Hisears95 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
minor slip at 0.17 and 0.43. No need to listen any further
corijn 2 years ago
I didn't hear any slip. But if you do I wouldn't listen to ANY music.
nearenough3 2 years ago 3
I played this prelude in 7th form and its really really hard, but this man played it perfect!
sanjita007 2 years ago
Don't forget. Emil Gilels is human. So whatever may have sparked this performance is partly controlled by his spontaneous and momentary thought process. No one is perfect. But the man was a masterful musician and pianist, and had definitely thought thoroughly about his approach towards many compositions.
Colby81886 2 years ago 10
1:29 ????????
TheFrenziedPianist 2 years ago 2
Good ear!
GrandPiano42 2 years ago
Жаль что сейчас нет такого уровня пианистов.Гениально!!!
rebekarbemol 2 years ago 2
Amazing. O.O
starrgrl24 2 years ago 3
wow,amazing,love it
shiadani 2 years ago
Whoever was in charge of shooting this clip is an idiot. No one wants to see his face; we want to see his hands!
coasterman16 2 years ago 4
I like all of the insight you all put into your comments, each one of you. That goes for the ones who favor this performance, and the ones who do not. But all of you are basing your opinion open the score. While Gilels based it on the man. The man being Prokofiev.
Colby81886 2 years ago
but this guy is playing 90% of his dynamics completely opposite to what prokofiev wrote on the score...
spazzshazzaj 2 years ago
i know right.
SIDLAK9 2 years ago
That is true. I am currently working with a student of Neuhaus, and when it comes to certain composers such as Prokofiev, she would give specific instruction (not on the page) of how it should be interpreted- based on the sources she obtained from working with those close to the composer, or readings.
In general, being an honest musician doesn't only mean to read the score with extreme sensitivity but to do research on the composer's personal notes, books, conversations, etc.
Colby81886 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
A very stupid performance by a professional who should know better. There is ONE half-measure marked "forte" in the printed score. The rest of the piece ranges from mezzo-piano to pianissimo, and the general directions are "vivo e delicato." Gilels's middle section fortissimos are asinine.
Very little expression; a brittle performance by a pianist who is obviously bored by the piece. Some of the kids on YouTube play the piece much better. Listen ot a few of them.
scooterbarf 2 years ago
it's nice to have someone chime in who's obviously a superior pianist to gilels.
resume, s.v.p.?
slothvader 2 years ago
hahaha! well done sloth.
scooter.....how about you play and post something by vid yes?
back words with action.
bigmadbad 2 years ago
To level such words as you do at one of the greatest pianists of the 20th century, and an acknowledged Prokofiev specialist, is simply indefensible. It is a prerogative of musicians of this caliber to choose to interpret the composer's musical ideas in ways that differ from the ones suggested by the composer. Your inability to grasp this simple truth makes you the asinine one here, as does your adherence to the simplistic category of "expression"
disturbiapixie 2 years ago 5
btw, you're obviously unfamiliar with Gilels' dynamic range if you take the fortes in the middle section for fortissimos
disturbiapixie 2 years ago
rather brutal, I'd say
zamyrabyrd 3 years ago
I think you should know by now that a lot of Prokofiev's piano music is brutal.
Gilels plays the piece really well!
DarkRaimundo 2 years ago
That must be a very brutal harp.
I agree with scooterbarf completely. And I don't think much of Prokofiev's music is supposed to be aggressive--spirited, angular, maybe, but not an outlet or channel for the performer's anger and/or frustration.
zamyrabyrd 2 years ago
Ok I do agree that for this piece, he does paly t a bit harder than what it is supposed to be, but I still like the interpretation.
DarkRaimundo 2 years ago
anybody got a clue on how to use the pedal for this piece ?
olpaysano 3 years ago
Ha ha, I learned this for a leavers concert in two weeks, pedaling is essential!!!! And hard on the feet.
nbambi1990 3 years ago
sounds real good
olpaysano 3 years ago
i like this performance. Actually sounds like a harp!
Simon0 3 years ago 2
Wo i'm currently working on it and it's nearly impossible to try and play it after you've watched THAT kind of video. So frustrating, so good.
SomewhereEls3 3 years ago
The way he makes it sounds so effortless is almost disconcerting. He makes it sound easy when in fact... yeah... Brilliant pianist.
PsychoticCat723 3 years ago
this piece is in fact pretty easy
disturbiapixie 3 years ago
Oh, it is? Can I see your version?
caroltans 3 years ago 2
well, I played it years ago and have a distinct recollection that it does not pose any extraordinary difficulties. maybe except that one's right hand gets tired after repeating the same figure for about two minutes, and the glissandi made my fingers sore... outside that, it's really basic stuff
disturbiapixie 3 years ago
Exactly the same, i had to play the glissando on my nail because i had to learn it in two weeks so took all the finger off of my thumb. I was told the tendons in my right hand looked scary when performing it.
nbambi1990 3 years ago
Oh, it is? Can I see your version?
caroltans 3 years ago 5
Wow, its amazing! Im trying play this and Id like to play it on my graduating concert, but Im worried when I watch this video... =) But I really loooove it! Perfect!
MyShelly03 3 years ago
simply beautifull
pur33z 3 years ago
a couple of days ago i was lunching with my ex-soviet defense establishment friend (i'm american) and i pronounced 'gilels' with a soft 'g' instead of hard, and she didn't immediately understand whom i meant.
she said she'd been educated to consider richter the best pianist, then gilels. she'd never heard of lazar berman.
this is a very well educated and smart woman, fwiw.
once she did
slothvader 3 years ago
it's very pretty, but i must say that i like it better on the harp..and when it's a bit slower.
but otherwise amazing. :D
kakashilover5963 3 years ago
So I'm learning this piece for University. I'm pretty upset that I'm not playing near as fast as that.
Damn you Gilels!
Why do you do everything better than me!
Eeeff 3 years ago 30
@Eeeff Speed doesn't mean everything. :)
EugeniusRock 3 months ago
What a simple but beautiful piece!
jero13595 3 years ago
want to learn it.
slothvader 3 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
I last watched this a month ago. I used to think it was beautiful, but now, when he plays it, it sounds too dull. No offense, Giles, but it just does.
DaFlashDude 3 years ago
It's Gilels! not Giles!
gkypianou 3 years ago
Charming piece indeed. Listening to this and the Toccata, two entirely different pieces.
Anders039 3 years ago
very charming piece
Tompelicious 4 years ago
great one,thank you for sharing.
jules
julesdarwich 4 years ago
wow.one of my favourite pieces by Sergi
chad410 4 years ago
hi chad10
visit my chanel to hear my version of this prelude.
jules
julesdarwich 4 years ago