Interesting video. A lot of good facts but not very good analysis.Revisionist history is usual the game of Dempublicans and Republicrats - sorry to see third party reps resorting to such misinformation. Clinton sucked but Bush will always be the all time champ scumbag.
So lobbing those cruise missles into Iraq during the Lewinsky scandal was to be viewed as what exactly, a gesture of friendship? It's an act of war genius. Come on, is that all you got?
The sanctions did not kill any Iraqis. It was Saddam who was killing his own people. Remember also that the Reagan and Poppa Bush administrations sold Saddam chemical weapons so he could use on Iranian troops and Iraqi civilians. They loved Saddam even though he was brutal. Remember also that Poppa Bush killed 100,000 Iraqis in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
Check how many Christians Clinton killed with US planes, (sporting UN decals) when he dropped bombs on Serbian churches, schools and hospitals, too... people forget that, and now the Muslim KLA runs drugs unimpeded
Clinton oversaw the war in Kosovo, it's true. And that conflict didn't degrade our international standing, had a minimum of U.S. casualties, and was wrapped up within the time of his administration, instead of being left as a legacy for another president to clean up.
Clinton invaded Panama and killed 1000's of civilians. Clinton used the police to attack and kill americans in their own homes- Waco- Ruby ridge- Elian Gonzalez... Al Gore sold off our WW1 emergency fuel oil supply to Occidental petroleum( a company Gore family had stock in ) for pennies on the dollar. Clinton also wire tapped americans after the 1993 WTC bombings. Stock Market tanked. Clinton pardons drug dealer who gives millions to Clinton. We need more of this?
I don't understand the rancor against Democrats, based on this brief video clip. It just demonstrates that Clinton was aware of issues, while highlighting the fact that he didn't make the severe mistake of engaging in a preemptive war with an enemy that had not attacked us.
Bill clinton ordered REGIME change in iraq in 1998 :).. HE also stated that he believed the only way iraq would get rid of its wmd programs fully was to remove saddam
@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 yup, and guess who had to take out saddam? not clinton, not bush sr., but former president bush, and people get on his ass for it, but its somthing alot of presidents wanted but never stayed until they got saddam but bush
@TheMattd546 Exactly.. I dont get how libya was justified on rumors.. Hell the administration even stated it was WHAT if gadaffi massacred thousands. Yet Libya is justified but Iraq is not? These people make 0 sense. Oh and Obama said when he was running we should never attack a country unless its an imminent threat to us. His own people said Libya was not an imminent threat.. Not that I want gadaffi in power im just stating its BS how this went down
@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 It's true. When U.S./UN-led coalition forces expelled Iraqi forces from Kuwait in 1991, Iraq signed a cease-fire agreement, which it subsequently violated numerous times, seriously. These violations led to the U.S.-led coalition to resume hostilities in 2003. The justifications for the 2003 conflict are written in the cease-fire agreement of 1991.
Those asserting that they are two different conflicts are sadly mistaken. It's only one Iraq War.
ArtSongAlliance: You say Clinton "was aware of issues". How come he didn't get bin Laden (he had at least 7 chances) after the WTC was attacked in '93? After the USS Cole attack and the U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania? After the Khobar Tower bombing? After bin Laden declared war against American in '98? Why did he let bin Laden finish the job on the WTC? BECAUSE HE WASN'T AWARE OR SMART ENOUGH!!!!
@ccgraphics20 -and your point since Bush sent 100s of thousands of troops right next to Bin Laden and didn't nab him either in 8 fucking years? You libs and neocons deserve each other.
@bnfox Al-Qaeda admitted to themselves that Bin Laden is dead right after the moments Bin Laden was shot by U.S. Special ops unit on his home in Pakistan. What more proof can you get?
@Hperman09 -sorry to hear that you believe nearly everything you see on TV.And really really sorry to hear that you are as gullible as they come.Keep up the no work!!!
you are soooo clueless...preemptive war in Kosovo? No! The Serbs were ethnically cleansing the region. And it was not because Yugoslavia presented an immediate threat to the US (though history tells us that destabilization of the region is what triggered WWII), but because of human atrocities that the UNITED NATIONS, with the full backing of the USA, went to war there. Your revisionist history won't work with me, kid.
In no way was the action in kosovo a "preemptive" attack. See, "PRE" means *before*. Now, you could say we did attack them "before" they attacked us- fine. Except you're twisting words as weither or not they would attack us was never a question and had nothing to do with our action there.
"Our military objective is to degrade and damage the military and security structure that President Milosevic (Yugoslav President) has used to depopulate and destroy the Albanian majority in Kosovo."
- From prepared statement of William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, to the Senate Armed Services Committee on 15 April 1999.)
Sorry if it sounds like I'm talking down to you specifically, I don't mean to be that way. But the word preemptive has been abused so completely seince 2000 and I just can't stand it.
So what you're saying, is that President Clinton unilaterally attacked a country that wasn't even going to attack America, and did not threaten America. (And without a UN resolution, too.)
God dammit. This video makes me so damn mad. All those nuts protesting the war pretending they care about Iraq. They just hate Bush and America and protesting is their place to vent their anger. Clinton attacked Yugoslavia,Kosovo,Bosnia, and yes even Iraq and no democrat cared then.
Comment removed
tinfoilrepair 1 year ago
Interesting video. A lot of good facts but not very good analysis.Revisionist history is usual the game of Dempublicans and Republicrats - sorry to see third party reps resorting to such misinformation. Clinton sucked but Bush will always be the all time champ scumbag.
bnfox 1 year ago
So lobbing those cruise missles into Iraq during the Lewinsky scandal was to be viewed as what exactly, a gesture of friendship? It's an act of war genius. Come on, is that all you got?
dalmatian847 1 year ago
Sounds like Clinton advocated regime change in this clip years before Bush was in the picture.
dalmatian847 2 years ago
@dalmatian847 He signed legislation promoting regime change, but that's a far cry away from launching a full on invasion.
joshatkins94 1 year ago
The sanctions did not kill any Iraqis. It was Saddam who was killing his own people. Remember also that the Reagan and Poppa Bush administrations sold Saddam chemical weapons so he could use on Iranian troops and Iraqi civilians. They loved Saddam even though he was brutal. Remember also that Poppa Bush killed 100,000 Iraqis in the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
BallinNQnz 2 years ago
HAHA looks like ole Saddam's gonna have to give-up "The Butcher of Baghdad" title to billy boy.
hellyeah762007 3 years ago
did you represent us when you signed NAFTA into law
bigmacattack05 3 years ago
it's funny how people think bush is evil. hell, Clinton killed many more people in Iraq with his sanctions than Bush did with military force.
truly the pen is mightier than the sword.
jinx2black 3 years ago 3
Care to site your sources?
iraqi body count (dot) com.
Do some research.
UncleRico13 3 years ago
Check how many Christians Clinton killed with US planes, (sporting UN decals) when he dropped bombs on Serbian churches, schools and hospitals, too... people forget that, and now the Muslim KLA runs drugs unimpeded
SamFreedom 2 years ago
Clinton oversaw the war in Kosovo, it's true. And that conflict didn't degrade our international standing, had a minimum of U.S. casualties, and was wrapped up within the time of his administration, instead of being left as a legacy for another president to clean up.
ArtSongAlliance 4 years ago
The massive bombing that Clinton did to Bosnia can only be equaled by the numbers of dead in Iraq. US troupes are still in there as of today.
cupera1 4 years ago 2
Clinton invaded Panama and killed 1000's of civilians. Clinton used the police to attack and kill americans in their own homes- Waco- Ruby ridge- Elian Gonzalez... Al Gore sold off our WW1 emergency fuel oil supply to Occidental petroleum( a company Gore family had stock in ) for pennies on the dollar. Clinton also wire tapped americans after the 1993 WTC bombings. Stock Market tanked. Clinton pardons drug dealer who gives millions to Clinton. We need more of this?
WalleyTV 4 years ago 3
I don't understand the rancor against Democrats, based on this brief video clip. It just demonstrates that Clinton was aware of issues, while highlighting the fact that he didn't make the severe mistake of engaging in a preemptive war with an enemy that had not attacked us.
ArtSongAlliance 4 years ago
Bill clinton ordered REGIME change in iraq in 1998 :).. HE also stated that he believed the only way iraq would get rid of its wmd programs fully was to remove saddam
KrGsMrNKusinagi0 4 years ago 7
@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 yup, and guess who had to take out saddam? not clinton, not bush sr., but former president bush, and people get on his ass for it, but its somthing alot of presidents wanted but never stayed until they got saddam but bush
TheMattd546 4 months ago
@TheMattd546 Exactly.. I dont get how libya was justified on rumors.. Hell the administration even stated it was WHAT if gadaffi massacred thousands. Yet Libya is justified but Iraq is not? These people make 0 sense. Oh and Obama said when he was running we should never attack a country unless its an imminent threat to us. His own people said Libya was not an imminent threat.. Not that I want gadaffi in power im just stating its BS how this went down
KrGsMrNKusinagi0 4 months ago
@KrGsMrNKusinagi0 It's true. When U.S./UN-led coalition forces expelled Iraqi forces from Kuwait in 1991, Iraq signed a cease-fire agreement, which it subsequently violated numerous times, seriously. These violations led to the U.S.-led coalition to resume hostilities in 2003. The justifications for the 2003 conflict are written in the cease-fire agreement of 1991.
Those asserting that they are two different conflicts are sadly mistaken. It's only one Iraq War.
publicmario17 4 months ago
ArtSongAlliance: You say Clinton "was aware of issues". How come he didn't get bin Laden (he had at least 7 chances) after the WTC was attacked in '93? After the USS Cole attack and the U.S. embassy bombings in Kenya and Tanzania? After the Khobar Tower bombing? After bin Laden declared war against American in '98? Why did he let bin Laden finish the job on the WTC? BECAUSE HE WASN'T AWARE OR SMART ENOUGH!!!!
ccgraphics20 4 years ago 7
@ccgraphics20 -and your point since Bush sent 100s of thousands of troops right next to Bin Laden and didn't nab him either in 8 fucking years? You libs and neocons deserve each other.
bnfox 1 year ago
@bnfox well we got Bin Laden now.
Hperman09 5 months ago
@Hperman09 -Bin Laden - a useful idiot and propaganda myth, was dead a decade ago....
bnfox 5 months ago
@bnfox Al-Qaeda admitted to themselves that Bin Laden is dead right after the moments Bin Laden was shot by U.S. Special ops unit on his home in Pakistan. What more proof can you get?
Hperman09 5 months ago
@Hperman09 -sorry to hear that you believe nearly everything you see on TV.And really really sorry to hear that you are as gullible as they come.Keep up the no work!!!
bnfox 5 months ago
@Hperman09 -not that I would expect someone with a bunch of trite pop culture corporate bullshit on their channel to actually know anything..
bnfox 5 months ago
@Hperman09 considering the cia funded and trained al qaeda i expect them to say what america tells them to say
sk8Rhino 1 week ago
Clinton preemptively invaded Kosovo (who did not attack or threaten America) and without a UN resolution (such as 1441 we had for Iraq).
BoogieWithStew 4 years ago
you are soooo clueless...preemptive war in Kosovo? No! The Serbs were ethnically cleansing the region. And it was not because Yugoslavia presented an immediate threat to the US (though history tells us that destabilization of the region is what triggered WWII), but because of human atrocities that the UNITED NATIONS, with the full backing of the USA, went to war there. Your revisionist history won't work with me, kid.
tennorrman 4 years ago
Did Kosovo attack America? No. Clinton preemptively invaded Kosovo (which did not pose a threat to the United States) and without a UN resolution.
Clinton had some NATO support, but DID NOT have a UN resolution as we did with 1441 in Iraq. Try opening a book.
BoogieWithStew 4 years ago
Preemptive actually has a definition.
In no way was the action in kosovo a "preemptive" attack. See, "PRE" means *before*. Now, you could say we did attack them "before" they attacked us- fine. Except you're twisting words as weither or not they would attack us was never a question and had nothing to do with our action there.
The mission was.... (cont)
getonwithitgawd 3 years ago
"Our military objective is to degrade and damage the military and security structure that President Milosevic (Yugoslav President) has used to depopulate and destroy the Albanian majority in Kosovo."
- From prepared statement of William S. Cohen, Secretary of Defense, to the Senate Armed Services Committee on 15 April 1999.)
getonwithitgawd 3 years ago
Sorry if it sounds like I'm talking down to you specifically, I don't mean to be that way. But the word preemptive has been abused so completely seince 2000 and I just can't stand it.
getonwithitgawd 3 years ago
So what you're saying, is that President Clinton unilaterally attacked a country that wasn't even going to attack America, and did not threaten America. (And without a UN resolution, too.)
Thanks for clarifying.
BoogieWithStew 3 years ago
Basically- yes. XD.
getonwithitgawd 3 years ago 3
Yeah, I am glad Bill Clinton sent our pilots in to help the Mujahadeen. They were so glad to thank us with bombings all around the world.
Clinton was glad to have a battle that he could appear to win, so he went for it.
He left ALL Islamic enemies alone. Lobbing a few missles at a goat path and empty tents didn't do squat.
Reagan fought Libya, Both Bushs' fought Iraq and Afghanistan. Why didn't Clinton help Rawanda if he was such a crusader of ethnic cleansing?
TheRudeNews 3 years ago
Yes. And he managed it superbly. Won it. Got the fuck out of there and we went on about our business.
19770326 3 years ago
Went on to invade other countries, you mean?
Back when Republicans stood against military adventurism. The good ol' days.
MooseOfReason 3 years ago
Great reminder.
Bsmack24 4 years ago 3
God dammit. This video makes me so damn mad. All those nuts protesting the war pretending they care about Iraq. They just hate Bush and America and protesting is their place to vent their anger. Clinton attacked Yugoslavia,Kosovo,Bosnia, and yes even Iraq and no democrat cared then.
TheAmericanManifesto 4 years ago 4
good stuff
epwspower 4 years ago 2
This is a great post, funny how the Democrats forget all of this stuff. Thank you for sharing it.
wyattmcintyre 4 years ago 2