Russian equip better than American? Then why in Korea, Vietnam, the Arab-Israeli wars, and the Gulf Wars, when US tanks and planes take on Russian ones, the Russian stuff gets its ass kicked??? In Gulf War I, 75% of all Saddam's Ruskie tanks (state of the art), were destroyed NOT BY PLANES but by American/British/French tanks! Why in the '68 war, a reserve brigade of Israeli SHERMAN TANKS (made during WW2, and just upgraded with a bigger gun) took on A DIVISION of T-72's and KICKED THEIR ASS???
USA military equipment are better than Russian military equipment! You watch future weapons you see how USA military equipment are better than Russian equipment! USA M1A2 SEP Abrams would fire M829A3 destroyed Russia T-90 in second! T-90 is processor from T-72! M1 Abrams is operate by USA, Australia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, & Iraq! USA, Egypt, & Saudi Arabia upgraded the Abrams to M1A2 SEP!
Russian equipment is better than American? Then why in every engagement btw Russian and American tanks and planes since 1945 (Korea, Vietnam, the Arab-Israeli conflicts, the Gulf Wars), American tanks and planes always kick the shit out of Russian stuff? 80% of the Russian tanks used by Iraq in 1991 (state of the art at the time) were DESTROYED not by planes but by American/British/and French tanks!!! In 1968, Israeli reserve SHERMAN WWII HAND-ME-DOWN tanks DECIMATED RUSSIAN T-72's! Pathetic!
Abrams tank has a Gas turbine engine that's miss guided for use on battlefields. Second the purchase of military equipment is political. Non-Aligned nations even if they have the choice of purchasing American equipment tend to buy Russian. India for example.
Russia designs its weapons for fighting the LAST WAR not the wars of the future (and tries to make super maneuverable fighters for dogfighting even though all American planes can destroy them now from over the horizon). Russia does make some nice stuff, but the edge America has in high tech sensors/trackers, radar, stealth, etc., is something Russia can no longer compete with--especially since most smart Russians ARE LEAVING Russia because of Putin!!!
Lol, ur funny. Dont u know that the pride of american tanks, the m1a1 abram spends more time in repair than fighting. GO ahead, look it up. Its too heavy so it often sinks into sand and mud, etc. Its turbine engine is so poorly designed it requires constant maintenance and if it doesnt get it, it will break down. The maintenance costs a lot and takes a lot of time putting the crew in harms way because they have to get out and fix it.
Т-90С - это экстпортная версия. На вооружениия ВС РФ стоят Т-90 и Т-90А. Кстати, у показанной здесь модели немного поиномо расположена динамическая защита. А журналист - лохозавр, говорит "это Тунгуска", а показывает кадры с БМПТ. :-)
But American tanks have one major technical defect that can't be overcome. They are manned by clinical imbeciles. American fools-in-uniform are responsible for a large percentage of the deaths of British and Canadian soldiers in Iraq. Because they are poorly-trained, indisciplined, psychologically unstable and intellectually retarded clowns.
Mmnn there is no Canadians in Iraq...Afghanistan yes,but not Iraq.And yes,that's a mayor technical issue they have :D lol....and not just in Tanks...bombers,planes,helicopters,battleships,etc.
But it's a bit harsh...every army on this planet has his share of stupid reckless soldiers.And War make's you psychologically unstable too,no matter where you come from,we can't blame them all.But hey...it's seems the U.S is plagued whit these kind of people...it's a generation problem.
Your a moron. Russian tanks totally suck. Your just mad because US M1 Abrams trash all the Russian T-72, T-64, T-55, & PT-76 in Iraq during 1991 Gulf War. Russian tanks crew sucks even suck at teaching the Iraq. hahaha. Russian tanks skill are stupid and lame totally poor trained. So Go Fuck your pathetic dead war criminals president. Kosovo, Bosnia, Albania, and Montergo is free from you pathetic Nazism Serbia.
@SilentEagles um they were downgraded tanks thou going up against a clerly butter traind army and better built tanks the abrams was new thous tanks were good for there time my dad was in the 1991 goulf war he said the t-72 did score some hits but did not pentrate the armor he said if the were upgraded abrams is still better but it would have ben a little more truble but relly it all comes down to training wich we have they dont but the t-90 is not a bad tank tho
@SilentEagles Odd, I thought that the Soviets won the biggest tank battles in history, against 'the best', that is to say, the German tank armies. What sort of tank was first across the sand berm into Iraq? An old Centurion AVRE.
@MarshallKutuzov Do you honestly believe that the country which fields the best tanks in the world would have anything but the best troops for armored warfare, given all of the resources at its disposal? Let's look at the performance of your beloved motherland in modern armored warfare. T-62's, T-72's operated by the Soviet tank divisions which were part of a group of alcoholics known as the Red Army, did nothing but provide large slow moving targets for third world guerrillas and their RPG's.
MarshallKutuzov. Mexican contractors are somewhat efficient, but there are not enough of them to defend america against a proper force. And I don't think that Tucker and Skeeter will manage to understand the manual that comes with the "Javelin"
the truth is...... you are a dumb fuck! the deception is.... amerikkka never been on the battle field against the Russians, they are too pussy to go fight with us, they use dirty tactics and dollars to kill my people.
Actually the US military has done a fuck of a lot better in Afghanistan than your retarded Russians did! Ever hear of the Stinger missile? All your jet and helicoptor pilots have! Kept the retarded comments coming!
The Afghani emir Amanulla the khan 7. 06. 1919 has sent V.I.Lenin the letter in which, informing on the introduction on a throne and about declaration of independence of Afghanistan, suggested to establish direct Soviet-Afghani diplomatic relations. The identical letter has been directed by the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan to G.V.Tchitcherin.
England, compelled to recognise independence of Afghanistan (in August 1919), has not refused, however, from intention to establish the actual domination in the country and in every possible way tried to break the Soviet-Afghani negotiations. In June 1920 in Kabul the plot organised by Englishmen against Amanulla-khan has been opened. This circumstance has strengthened aspiration of Afghanistan to rapprochement from RF.
The contract has been signed in 1921 despite counteraction of England. It became a basis for the Soviet-Afghani friendship.
RSFSR and Afghanistan were mutually obliged "not to enter with the third power the military or political agreement which would deliver a damage of one of contracting parties"
Soviet government gave to Afghanistan "monetary and other material aid" and also "free and duty-free transit through the any territory of the cargoes bought by Afghanistan as in the Russia... and it is direct abroad".
Hey Russian(Retard)Defender100, enjoy living in Putin's wondrous dictatorship! Enjoy a nation where the elections are systemically rigged by the gov't! Enjoy not having a free press! Enjoy a country where ppl critical of Putin wind up dead! Enjoy denying & praising the murders of Stalin and the commies! Enjoy being despised by millions of East Europeans! Enjoy defending the policies of Russia/USSR, a nation that's murdered more ppl than Hitler! So much to be proud of!!!
that's not true. analyze israel-arabs wars. it means american weapons in good hands versus soviet (russian) weapons in not so good hands. you will find striking examples of russian weapon prevailance.
it means, as shown by actual events, that soldiers of arabic armies were not always well trained. nevertheless russian weapons worked well even at these circumstances. example - begining of 1973 war when big losses were inflicted on israelis by soviet anti-tank and anti-aircraft rockets.
If you analyze you will find American sophisticated weapon in Israel hand vs Sling shot rocks and stones in Arabs hands.Are you referring those sling shots rocks & Stone Russian ?
i do not mean israel-palestinian relations. i mean israel-arab wars. there were the following wars: 1948 (started by arabs, won by Israel); 1956 (started and won by Israel); 1967 (started and won by Israel); 1973 (started by Egypt very successfully, finally a tie); 1982 (started and won by Israel); 2006 (started by Israel, no winner).
T-90 is really Ultimate Tank in the world.
chotuzwazzz 1 year ago
It will be 1,200 by 2010 or 2011.
GoldenZealot21 2 years ago
Do not splash a saliva, ArIluvatar!
To leave a battlefield it is necessary without losing mind and honour!
alpointru 2 years ago
Russian equip better than American? Then why in Korea, Vietnam, the Arab-Israeli wars, and the Gulf Wars, when US tanks and planes take on Russian ones, the Russian stuff gets its ass kicked??? In Gulf War I, 75% of all Saddam's Ruskie tanks (state of the art), were destroyed NOT BY PLANES but by American/British/French tanks! Why in the '68 war, a reserve brigade of Israeli SHERMAN TANKS (made during WW2, and just upgraded with a bigger gun) took on A DIVISION of T-72's and KICKED THEIR ASS???
ArIluvatar 2 years ago
During WW2 the Germans possesed the most advanced military equipment, by far.
brendonnz1964 2 years ago
With the Soviets barely behind. Then the Americans, British, Japanese, Italians were in the stone age compared to the two Superpowers.
GoldenZealot21 2 years ago
& just 1 last thing i really worry about you people,Really how stupid can you people be,& good luck.
core1976scotland 2 years ago
USA military equipment are better than Russian military equipment! You watch future weapons you see how USA military equipment are better than Russian equipment! USA M1A2 SEP Abrams would fire M829A3 destroyed Russia T-90 in second! T-90 is processor from T-72! M1 Abrams is operate by USA, Australia, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, & Iraq! USA, Egypt, & Saudi Arabia upgraded the Abrams to M1A2 SEP!
USAAIRPOWER 2 years ago
No, not better, care to remind us why the M829A3 was developed? that is proof that US equipment is NOT better.
vtkrey 2 years ago
Russian equipment is better than American? Then why in every engagement btw Russian and American tanks and planes since 1945 (Korea, Vietnam, the Arab-Israeli conflicts, the Gulf Wars), American tanks and planes always kick the shit out of Russian stuff? 80% of the Russian tanks used by Iraq in 1991 (state of the art at the time) were DESTROYED not by planes but by American/British/and French tanks!!! In 1968, Israeli reserve SHERMAN WWII HAND-ME-DOWN tanks DECIMATED RUSSIAN T-72's! Pathetic!
ArIluvatar 2 years ago
Abrams tank has a Gas turbine engine that's miss guided for use on battlefields. Second the purchase of military equipment is political. Non-Aligned nations even if they have the choice of purchasing American equipment tend to buy Russian. India for example.
vorjay 2 years ago
India still buys Russian because friendship with Russia is a hedge against China, dipshit!
ArIluvatar 2 years ago
Its not quite bombs down chimneys are stuff buddy! the americans have even admited as much.
core1976scotland 2 years ago
Gay tank.
beetweenmylegs 2 years ago
Couldnt you have come up with something more creative than "Gay tank"?
vtkrey 2 years ago
I enjoyed being part of a T-90 tank crew.
MarshalGeorgyZhukov 2 years ago
Its an ok cheap tank.
Killazer 2 years ago
T-90 is the Best, well equipped and reliable even
to harsh Siberian Winters ))
RussianDefender100 2 years ago
-Great! another ARMS RACE I love it. We love to spend. pst i've got 50k in the bank how manny "Mig" rides can i get?
It was 10k few years ago for 1 flight on 23rd or another old MiG.
Nitrorus 2 years ago
Russia makes the best weapons!
PrometheusHR 2 years ago 4
"Russia makes the best weapons!"
Russia designs its weapons for fighting the LAST WAR not the wars of the future (and tries to make super maneuverable fighters for dogfighting even though all American planes can destroy them now from over the horizon). Russia does make some nice stuff, but the edge America has in high tech sensors/trackers, radar, stealth, etc., is something Russia can no longer compete with--especially since most smart Russians ARE LEAVING Russia because of Putin!!!
ArIluvatar 2 years ago
You want a Mig ride? XD
vtkrey 2 years ago
This tank CANT compete with anything the UNITED STATES HAS; TRY AGIAN RUSSIA.
IconListening 2 years ago
Lol, ur funny. Dont u know that the pride of american tanks, the m1a1 abram spends more time in repair than fighting. GO ahead, look it up. Its too heavy so it often sinks into sand and mud, etc. Its turbine engine is so poorly designed it requires constant maintenance and if it doesnt get it, it will break down. The maintenance costs a lot and takes a lot of time putting the crew in harms way because they have to get out and fix it.
watch?v=eBWuhdDkxho&feature=channel_page
dshepkin 2 years ago
to IconListening
Be quiet for Russia. This is real things for war.
That you see, it 's not Т-90, it's new modification - Т-90С.
What means C, russian experts know only.
These tanks buy of the country for which there are real war clouds.
Because they know - if Russia does these tanks for Russian Army, means its the best in the world.
alpointru 2 years ago
Т-90С - это экстпортная версия. На вооружениия ВС РФ стоят Т-90 и Т-90А. Кстати, у показанной здесь модели немного поиномо расположена динамическая защита. А журналист - лохозавр, говорит "это Тунгуска", а показывает кадры с БМПТ. :-)
Nitrorus 2 years ago
Whats the point? we wont see any drones anyways.
vtkrey 2 years ago
as far as i know it will love them too.
mikkitiny 2 years ago
anthony, Tunguska eats those drone planes for breakfast.
vtkrey 2 years ago
I love it. Go Russia !!!
SuperTankT95 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
No matter how sophisticated Russian weapon are,They all way became inferior to the American weapons on all of the previous battle field.
TRUTHvsDECEPTION 2 years ago
But American tanks have one major technical defect that can't be overcome. They are manned by clinical imbeciles. American fools-in-uniform are responsible for a large percentage of the deaths of British and Canadian soldiers in Iraq. Because they are poorly-trained, indisciplined, psychologically unstable and intellectually retarded clowns.
MarshallKutuzov 2 years ago 16
Beautiful words!
russianpride415 2 years ago 2
Mmnn there is no Canadians in Iraq...Afghanistan yes,but not Iraq.And yes,that's a mayor technical issue they have :D lol....and not just in Tanks...bombers,planes,helicopters,battleships,etc.
But it's a bit harsh...every army on this planet has his share of stupid reckless soldiers.And War make's you psychologically unstable too,no matter where you come from,we can't blame them all.But hey...it's seems the U.S is plagued whit these kind of people...it's a generation problem.
EyFmS 2 years ago
@MarshallKutuzov
Your a moron. Russian tanks totally suck. Your just mad because US M1 Abrams trash all the Russian T-72, T-64, T-55, & PT-76 in Iraq during 1991 Gulf War. Russian tanks crew sucks even suck at teaching the Iraq. hahaha. Russian tanks skill are stupid and lame totally poor trained. So Go Fuck your pathetic dead war criminals president. Kosovo, Bosnia, Albania, and Montergo is free from you pathetic Nazism Serbia.
SilentEagles 1 year ago
@SilentEagles um they were downgraded tanks thou going up against a clerly butter traind army and better built tanks the abrams was new thous tanks were good for there time my dad was in the 1991 goulf war he said the t-72 did score some hits but did not pentrate the armor he said if the were upgraded abrams is still better but it would have ben a little more truble but relly it all comes down to training wich we have they dont but the t-90 is not a bad tank tho
KHfreak7526 1 year ago
@SilentEagles Odd, I thought that the Soviets won the biggest tank battles in history, against 'the best', that is to say, the German tank armies. What sort of tank was first across the sand berm into Iraq? An old Centurion AVRE.
harryfaber 1 year ago
@SilentEagles You're a fucking idiot. Nuff said. :)
DigitalDNA 6 months ago
@MarshallKutuzov Do you honestly believe that the country which fields the best tanks in the world would have anything but the best troops for armored warfare, given all of the resources at its disposal? Let's look at the performance of your beloved motherland in modern armored warfare. T-62's, T-72's operated by the Soviet tank divisions which were part of a group of alcoholics known as the Red Army, did nothing but provide large slow moving targets for third world guerrillas and their RPG's.
NastyChuck 1 year ago
hahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahaahhahahahah
oh man you are funny
igib2635 2 years ago
I agree with
MarshallKutuzov. Mexican contractors are somewhat efficient, but there are not enough of them to defend america against a proper force. And I don't think that Tucker and Skeeter will manage to understand the manual that comes with the "Javelin"
ArtypNk 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
bullshit
vendetta007mike 2 years ago
the truth is...... you are a dumb fuck! the deception is.... amerikkka never been on the battle field against the Russians, they are too pussy to go fight with us, they use dirty tactics and dollars to kill my people.
russianpride415 2 years ago 2
I Guss you are the only Russian who really know the history LOL !
Guss what we got the crazy Muslims use our weapons against your so-call sophisticated weapons to prove them inferior.
TRUTHvsDECEPTION 2 years ago
LOL sophistocated fat yank armies
killed by Ordinary Afghan militants on the highlands, at least our weapons are killing good yanks.
Keep the Body Bags Piling
Enjoy the Dead Yanks ))
RussianDefender100 2 years ago
Actually the US military has done a fuck of a lot better in Afghanistan than your retarded Russians did! Ever hear of the Stinger missile? All your jet and helicoptor pilots have! Kept the retarded comments coming!
ArIluvatar 2 years ago
The Russians have not sold any shoulder fired weapons to the Taliban, unlike the US in the 80's. Afghanistan is a Western Sphere of influence.
brendonnz1964 2 years ago
"Afghanistan is a Western Sphere of influence."
Are you assured of it?
alpointru 2 years ago
British have been there for a few centuries, trading in the Opuim business.
brendonnz1964 2 years ago
The Afghani emir Amanulla the khan 7. 06. 1919 has sent V.I.Lenin the letter in which, informing on the introduction on a throne and about declaration of independence of Afghanistan, suggested to establish direct Soviet-Afghani diplomatic relations. The identical letter has been directed by the Minister for Foreign Affairs of Afghanistan to G.V.Tchitcherin.
alpointru 2 years ago
England, compelled to recognise independence of Afghanistan (in August 1919), has not refused, however, from intention to establish the actual domination in the country and in every possible way tried to break the Soviet-Afghani negotiations. In June 1920 in Kabul the plot organised by Englishmen against Amanulla-khan has been opened. This circumstance has strengthened aspiration of Afghanistan to rapprochement from RF.
alpointru 2 years ago
The contract has been signed in 1921 despite counteraction of England. It became a basis for the Soviet-Afghani friendship.
RSFSR and Afghanistan were mutually obliged "not to enter with the third power the military or political agreement which would deliver a damage of one of contracting parties"
alpointru 2 years ago
Soviet government gave to Afghanistan "monetary and other material aid" and also "free and duty-free transit through the any territory of the cargoes bought by Afghanistan as in the Russia... and it is direct abroad".
alpointru 2 years ago
exactly why they turned against u, look whos now fighting in afghanistan
msjconnolly 2 years ago
"Enjoy the Dead Yanks"
Hey Russian(Retard)Defender100, enjoy living in Putin's wondrous dictatorship! Enjoy a nation where the elections are systemically rigged by the gov't! Enjoy not having a free press! Enjoy a country where ppl critical of Putin wind up dead! Enjoy denying & praising the murders of Stalin and the commies! Enjoy being despised by millions of East Europeans! Enjoy defending the policies of Russia/USSR, a nation that's murdered more ppl than Hitler! So much to be proud of!!!
ArIluvatar 2 years ago
how would u kno whts it like over there u little fagot. ur to pussy to live over there any way. Do u actually believe everything that is said on tv?
msjconnolly 2 years ago
that's not true. analyze israel-arabs wars. it means american weapons in good hands versus soviet (russian) weapons in not so good hands. you will find striking examples of russian weapon prevailance.
mikkitiny 2 years ago
what you mean in not so good hands?
AlexanderSigal 2 years ago
it means, as shown by actual events, that soldiers of arabic armies were not always well trained. nevertheless russian weapons worked well even at these circumstances. example - begining of 1973 war when big losses were inflicted on israelis by soviet anti-tank and anti-aircraft rockets.
mikkitiny 2 years ago
Israel vs Arab.
If you analyze you will find American sophisticated weapon in Israel hand vs Sling shot rocks and stones in Arabs hands.Are you referring those sling shots rocks & Stone Russian ?
TRUTHvsDECEPTION 2 years ago
i do not mean israel-palestinian relations. i mean israel-arab wars. there were the following wars: 1948 (started by arabs, won by Israel); 1956 (started and won by Israel); 1967 (started and won by Israel); 1973 (started by Egypt very successfully, finally a tie); 1982 (started and won by Israel); 2006 (started by Israel, no winner).
mikkitiny 2 years ago
i hope cyprus army buy the T90 the T80 that we have is our pride
cypriot1000 2 years ago
yeah hopefully Cyprus can kick the dirty turks out.
09darjac 2 years ago
Go the germans use tunguska?
Typhoon07 2 years ago
No, Gemany use very similar Gepard.
SuperTankT95 2 years ago
I was first to post. This will provoke alot of jealousy. I the man,. ;
KNOWYOUNOW 2 years ago