Sorry.i am a free energy inventor an this was already tried 15 years ago with a device called . E.L.S.A .Same principle and i have the exclusive plans . Still it don't work
Keep those Gears turning !! First what you are saying is it runs off of gravity . It will NOT work in Space ,no gravity as it will just float away.Second it won't work underwater cause it runs with water so that nulls out also your 2 pounds of downward force will require 20 or more pound of force to over come gravity so it will drop once and never come back up unless you use your hands:
I can appreciate your efforts on this. The missing piece of the puzzle is WHAT pushes and pulls on your 'accordion' - you need an energy source. In your description you speak of wave energy on the surface of the sea... that would be one possible source, if you have an ocean handy. Me, I'm in Arkansas so...
Just the logic of it, what unkown force opens up your accordian? Explain yourself. The liquid runs into the accordian, as you say 2lbs of liquid to push the 15lbs accordian open so It can squeeze the 2lbs worth of liquid back into the container that would go down and repeat the cycle. The math is not correct, so explain yourself if you will, or remain a poor inventor as is.
@Gunner3210 Your imagination lacks as many parts as my parts of being able to explain it properly !
Throw it in the ocean, on a platform then, and crank it with the motion of a jailed boat.
Dont worry about it, XX Throw a flat rectangle on top of a bunch of triables, cut a piece off of the bottom, add dimention, to me means, it ends up looking a lot like the haul of a ship. PS. I do not yet suffer of dimentia. Welcome back. Good luck ! XX < overkill.
Unfortunately there's not enough room to provide you the info you need to proceed. Next time, you might consider adding a website or some way to reach you on the video itself. One thing I can tell you is that you don't need a patent. You want an Intellectual Properties rights on your invention. Same won't allow me to provide you more info. Sorry.
@deliquenme I ran out of materials and thereafter, noticed that there was too many ways of harvesting energy, with the movement of liquid, air ... I saw my competion ! also There was other inventions for me to play with and, it became way to much for me to want to do, without you and others. This is too big for me. I am just offering the beginings now, my 1%. like an upsidedown corner stone to something ! XX read again. I am getting a little better at explaining my thoughts, corner stone brain.
Pass that joint over here so I can understand this the way you do :) Try using the rise in tides or wave action to lift your device...now that is free energy
If you have something clearly written maybe I can take a look at it and we can go from there. If you have a blog site or website, showing this invention a little more clearly, then please feel free to let me know.
I don't know how to communicate with you privately but maybe we can put a working model together. Chris.
Thank you for you work towards free , clean energy for all ! I am working on this project together with some expert scientistis... Your work is appreciated!
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
this is one of the most insane things i've ever watched. you should take your meds, you'll come down from this manic episode and say wtf was i thinking?
dont waste your money on a patent company with any over unity of perpetual motion inventions they will take your money and go thru everything just for the patent to be turned down by the patent office, plus like i said if some one else sees this and then builds a working model (no one can) then it will be there invention not yours, right now you have an idea not an invention
but dont give up, like i said i have a patent and would not have gotten one with my first model just keep it up, rember a patent is not for an idea it is for some that can be proven to work with most thing a patent screener can tell but when it comes to perpetual motion the patent office got sick of all of them and not one worked when built so now they will not grant you a patent unless you have a proven working model.
I understand what your trying to do but with the head of the water being higher in the large container then in the smaller one the water will not go back in to the larger one, in fact when the smaller one drops the water will rush out of the larger one in to the smaller one until they are the same hight. sorry but it will not work but at least you are trying keep it up.
I am glad you desided to try to come up with an energy idea, but you need to understand some things first i am a patent holder the search is to just check to make sure no one else has a patent on the same idea, second you can not get a patent on a perpetual motion invention any more unless you have a working model. and since you don't you can't get one and if some one took your idea and made it work, it would be there invention then not yours.
LOL-not to be disrespectful-but as an inventor-I can pick up some new concepts quickly-but I'm really just baffled and confused-when I hear squish and acordian I cant focus on your concept...I'm probably just slow...Good Luck
Things cant push themselves! You use water as force media and at the SAME MOMENT water is supposed to push big object to the right it will stop floating and create BALANCE. For gravity engines probably best way of thinking is in off-balance/excentric-shaft devices that can create DELAY. Great intro speech though ... 100% agree on that!
I'll respectfully tell you that i have a reason to believe this is not perpetual motion:
the reason is that the 8 pounds worth of liquid pushing the acordeon will only push that equivalent length on the 15 pounds device not the whole thing.. leading to a state of equilibrium each time there is a squish... that, of course, without considering friction, wich you can minimize, but not completely get rid of it.
Also I didn't understand how was the 8 pounds device supposed to go up once its down
@truthiseverall metadreamik has a point, this will not work perpetually. simply, there is Friction, and your device does nothing to overcome it. this device would operate below unity.
Look up cartesian pump .
4CHRISTONLY1 5 days ago
E.L.S.A is the same as it uses water gravity and a Shuttle . It is owned by the inventor however it has the problem of overcomming gravity also .
4CHRISTONLY1 5 days ago
Sorry.i am a free energy inventor an this was already tried 15 years ago with a device called . E.L.S.A .Same principle and i have the exclusive plans . Still it don't work
4CHRISTONLY1 5 days ago
Keep those Gears turning !! First what you are saying is it runs off of gravity . It will NOT work in Space ,no gravity as it will just float away.Second it won't work underwater cause it runs with water so that nulls out also your 2 pounds of downward force will require 20 or more pound of force to over come gravity so it will drop once and never come back up unless you use your hands:
4CHRISTONLY1 5 days ago
And when you said, this can be used in space... how is the water meant to fall down with no gravity..?
ADisabledNan 1 week ago
& what price point is this targeted at?
Begbucks 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from truthiseverall
How many kw per hr. could this sustain in the configuration displayed?
Begbucks 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from truthiseverall
I can appreciate your efforts on this. The missing piece of the puzzle is WHAT pushes and pulls on your 'accordion' - you need an energy source. In your description you speak of wave energy on the surface of the sea... that would be one possible source, if you have an ocean handy. Me, I'm in Arkansas so...
Peopleunit 2 weeks ago in playlist More videos from truthiseverall
You have too many mechanical losses in your conversion train. And, sorry to say, it's already been thought of. :) Have a look at this:
enDOTwikipediaDOTorg/wiki/Islay_LIMPET
It uses a column of air to drive an enclosed turbine.
DickHBox 1 month ago
Just the logic of it, what unkown force opens up your accordian? Explain yourself. The liquid runs into the accordian, as you say 2lbs of liquid to push the 15lbs accordian open so It can squeeze the 2lbs worth of liquid back into the container that would go down and repeat the cycle. The math is not correct, so explain yourself if you will, or remain a poor inventor as is.
Rotitomato 1 month ago
Sorry, but the physics behind your "invention" is just garbage. This is more along the lines of crackpot science.
If you want to really know why this will not work, I suggest you go to school and learn.
Or you can finish building your invention and see the proof for yourself.
Gunner3210 4 months ago
@Gunner3210 look and read now with the final touches ! Touch !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@Gunner3210 Your imagination lacks as many parts as my parts of being able to explain it properly !
Throw it in the ocean, on a platform then, and crank it with the motion of a jailed boat.
Dont worry about it, XX Throw a flat rectangle on top of a bunch of triables, cut a piece off of the bottom, add dimention, to me means, it ends up looking a lot like the haul of a ship. PS. I do not yet suffer of dimentia. Welcome back. Good luck ! XX < overkill.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Unfortunately there's not enough room to provide you the info you need to proceed. Next time, you might consider adding a website or some way to reach you on the video itself. One thing I can tell you is that you don't need a patent. You want an Intellectual Properties rights on your invention. Same won't allow me to provide you more info. Sorry.
grafxextreme 6 months ago
The way you explain it it's easy to build, why don't you do it yourself?
deliquenme 6 months ago
@deliquenme I ran out of materials and thereafter, noticed that there was too many ways of harvesting energy, with the movement of liquid, air ... I saw my competion ! also There was other inventions for me to play with and, it became way to much for me to want to do, without you and others. This is too big for me. I am just offering the beginings now, my 1%. like an upsidedown corner stone to something ! XX read again. I am getting a little better at explaining my thoughts, corner stone brain.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Law of diminishing returns.
nickcorrine 6 months ago
Pass that joint over here so I can understand this the way you do :) Try using the rise in tides or wave action to lift your device...now that is free energy
skibee50 8 months ago
@skibee50 See the new waves and tides, read the outcome.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
You have some studying to do. It is called the 2nd Law of Thermodynamics.
veronicats100 9 months ago
@veronicats100 Studies you say ? they did not teach YOU or I this in school ! Good Luck XX the world is smaller than we know.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Awesome.
Edwinward 9 months ago
@Edwinward Read the conclusion of this invention again, make my day !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Hi,
I see the logic behind your device.
If you have something clearly written maybe I can take a look at it and we can go from there. If you have a blog site or website, showing this invention a little more clearly, then please feel free to let me know.
I don't know how to communicate with you privately but maybe we can put a working model together. Chris.
rufdawg100 1 year ago
so why don't you make one that works???
josephdupont 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Why not you create a working model to demonstrate that it really works...
mcaanuj 1 year ago
Why not you create a working model to demonstrate that it really works...
mcaanuj 1 year ago
Thank you for you work towards free , clean energy for all ! I am working on this project together with some expert scientistis... Your work is appreciated!
sugarbabe06 1 year ago
@sugarbabe06 "My" conclusions are final. Not many people see it as I did ! Read away and Good luck to you.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
wow um there are SOOO many problems with this idea...... it's ridiculous
um yes if 2lb water went down it would go 'almost' back to the top minus the friction+load....
when the 2lb water is released from the bucket your inertia is GONE!!! IT WILL NOT GO BACK UP!!!!
napzzter1 1 year ago
@napzzter1 miniturize the idea. and, look again in a thousand ways
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Minime stop humping the laaaaser *puts pinking to mouth*
MrDrTutorial 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Belive it or not Free energy is real,But a few ppl make too many billions from our energy needs to let this technology be known,Get a real free energy motor at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Be part of the revolution!
faerydhhlo 1 year ago
Nope. Nucular is still better than this. Dispite the nucular waste...
loren443 1 year ago
this is one of the most insane things i've ever watched. you should take your meds, you'll come down from this manic episode and say wtf was i thinking?
jwallbanger 1 year ago
@jwallbanger Thought of you now ! XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
This is what happens when woman tries to think logically.
sikkepossu 1 year ago 2
@sikkepossu LOL jokes.
loren443 1 year ago
@sikkepossu Exactly !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Brilliant idea ... I am very happy ... I received his sight after this video ...Perhaps you are from another planet!
ozon12free 1 year ago
@ozon12free
Perhaps
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@ozon12free Me too !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
You need to explain this a lot further because all I see is a device with false logic. What's preventing you from making a prototype?
Rotitomato 1 year ago
@Rotitomato
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@truthiseverall Yep ! maybe I do not explain very well !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@Rotitomato Too many possibilities to make, in this competitive world.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
maybe try putting some magnets in there. idk much, but magnets are a lot of fun, and mysterious. just like this invention.
piceochite 1 year ago
@piceochite
Yes, for the magnet too ......
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@truthiseverall The magnet is optional to the thousands of ways that this could be done XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@piceochite Thank you for your reply XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
you would need another "squish" to get the water back up.
rubikscubix1 1 year ago
@rubikscubix1
Two then !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@truthiseverall No ! make it one hundred pushed back by wind on a smaller scale. XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@rubikscubix1 or wind force or something ! Think small with me on that one. XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
With all due respect you need to take some courses in Physics, particularly Thermodynamics.
haxenophon 1 year ago
@haxenophon
Thank you for your wise advice !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@truthiseverall You are welcome. The world is small and round and alone sort of imediately ! XX lol
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@haxenophon My course is drawn, but thank you.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
dont waste your money on a patent company with any over unity of perpetual motion inventions they will take your money and go thru everything just for the patent to be turned down by the patent office, plus like i said if some one else sees this and then builds a working model (no one can) then it will be there invention not yours, right now you have an idea not an invention
1crazyfocker 1 year ago 2
@1crazyfocker
The courts know this too and would stand with me to differ the truth, of that comon known scam !
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinacle !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@1crazyfocker You are good, Thanks !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
but dont give up, like i said i have a patent and would not have gotten one with my first model just keep it up, rember a patent is not for an idea it is for some that can be proven to work with most thing a patent screener can tell but when it comes to perpetual motion the patent office got sick of all of them and not one worked when built so now they will not grant you a patent unless you have a proven working model.
1crazyfocker 1 year ago
@1crazyfocker
Go for it, I am the first and no one can say otherwise !
I give you permission to use it XXOO
& Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
I understand what your trying to do but with the head of the water being higher in the large container then in the smaller one the water will not go back in to the larger one, in fact when the smaller one drops the water will rush out of the larger one in to the smaller one until they are the same hight. sorry but it will not work but at least you are trying keep it up.
1crazyfocker 1 year ago 2
@1crazyfocker
Thank you
Try this one then > Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
I am glad you desided to try to come up with an energy idea, but you need to understand some things first i am a patent holder the search is to just check to make sure no one else has a patent on the same idea, second you can not get a patent on a perpetual motion invention any more unless you have a working model. and since you don't you can't get one and if some one took your idea and made it work, it would be there invention then not yours.
1crazyfocker 1 year ago 2
What a dork
crafter2u 1 year ago
@crafter2u I have my moments too !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
LOL-not to be disrespectful-but as an inventor-I can pick up some new concepts quickly-but I'm really just baffled and confused-when I hear squish and acordian I cant focus on your concept...I'm probably just slow...Good Luck
Jeenyus1983 1 year ago
@Jeenyus1983
You are probably just, not a female ! it is another dimension > Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle then !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@truthiseverall XXX I'm back from the moon ! Good Luck on my end writings.
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@truthiseverall The moon that NASAU bombed !
truthiseverall 1 month ago
@Jeenyus1983 Update finished ! Good luck no matter how I explain things. I am not educated like you XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Even if you get close to doing this, by the laws of thermodynamics this cannot be achieved.
dE=dQ-dW
dQ=t*ds
->>S=dQ/T+S_gen
thus any procesess will generate entropy, which in essence is loss in the systems energy
MITthuglife 1 year ago
@MITthuglife
There are many ways to move things within this invention >
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle then !
Good luck XXOO
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@MITthuglife Come again, to my school XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
Wow, you're so close! I wonder why you don't just get it working? I wonder.... NOT.
DukeLaCrosse20 2 years ago
@DukeLaCrosse20
NOT !
There are many ways to move things within this invention >
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle then !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
Things cant push themselves! You use water as force media and at the SAME MOMENT water is supposed to push big object to the right it will stop floating and create BALANCE. For gravity engines probably best way of thinking is in off-balance/excentric-shaft devices that can create DELAY. Great intro speech though ... 100% agree on that!
gogiser 2 years ago
@gogiser
There are many ways to move things within this invention > pulleys are not shown either.
> Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle then !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
@gogiser come again XX
truthiseverall 1 month ago
hahaha sensational. you build a real perpetual motion generator. you beat the physics. your are like an god with tiger legs.
how can 2 pounds of water move 15 pounds of accordion back?
housemilbe 2 years ago
@housemilbe
There are many ways to move things within this invention >
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle then !
PS. generators already exist XXOO
truthiseverall 1 year ago
I'll respectfully tell you that i have a reason to believe this is not perpetual motion:
the reason is that the 8 pounds worth of liquid pushing the acordeon will only push that equivalent length on the 15 pounds device not the whole thing.. leading to a state of equilibrium each time there is a squish... that, of course, without considering friction, wich you can minimize, but not completely get rid of it.
Also I didn't understand how was the 8 pounds device supposed to go up once its down
metadreamik 2 years ago
Where the heck, does you eight pounds worth, come from ? Is not from my brain matter !
I suggest, "you" stop thinking on this matter at once ! for your own good.
Good luck, on other things.
truthiseverall 2 years ago
@truthiseverall metadreamik has a point, this will not work perpetually. simply, there is Friction, and your device does nothing to overcome it. this device would operate below unity.
daenumen 1 year ago
@metadreamik
The pulleys are not shown, they are for you to figure.
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
Keep Going! You are using your mind!
BETTERTOMARROW 2 years ago
That's like telling me, I did not prior !
DUH !
truthiseverall 2 years ago
So how would I've known if you used your mind or not Prior, all I can see is this!
I Guess You dont know When you get a COMPLIMENT or Praise !!
BETTERTOMARROW 2 years ago
I am not seeking either,
Sorry !
truthiseverall 2 years ago
@BETTERTOMARROW
Upside down pyramid with a layer of liquid on top then ?
wave pool then, to crank the pinnacle !
truthiseverall 1 year ago
LOL!
think again, please!
TURRlCAN 2 years ago
My thinking is considered done on this one !
nice try !
truthiseverall 2 years ago
Thank you for your comment dear, declaredworr !
& I know more than you think !
truthiseverall 2 years ago
you obviously have no idea what you are talking about, and your "invention" doesn't even work.
declareworr 2 years ago