I would take the "rights of the fetus" crowd (which is certainly legitimate) far more seriously If I also heard them addressing issues that are easily preventable, such the 15mil. children who die a year from treatable diseases. Are they calling for the USA to increase its foreign aid, which is the most miserly of any developed nation? That would go a a very long way in protecting innocent life, and shouldn't be controversial.
I am not sure what you mean by "miserly". Our foreign aid is more than any other nation on earth in addition to private charities that work around the world. Over 25 billion in 2007.
USAs aid, in terms of percentage of their GNP has almost always been lower than any other industrialized nation in the world, though paradoxically since 2000, their dollar amount has been the highest.The point is we are in a much greater position to give more and every industrialized nation give a higher percentage of their GNP than we do.
I was referring to the US gov't, i should have been more clear. You surely are in favor of us giving a higher percentage of our GNP to avert preventable disease and death, i assume, to protect innocent life. Pro choice does not mena pro abortion, it means keeping safe and legal as they are going to be performed in back alley ways otherwise. The efficacy of abstinence only education is known to be low. just google it.
Not justifying anything. I agree w you as far the rights of the fetus are concerned. When you begin to express moral outrage over a subject where there are no conflicting values (treating lethal cases of diarrhea for pennies a day) then I can take you seriously about issues that are complicated, such as abortion. I would prefer zero abortions a year, but I also feel it needs to be safe and legal. There are conflicting values at play,as is often the case in complicated issues.
Respectfully, there are no conflicting values. You either value the life of the child or you don't. I agree with you that more needs to be done around the world for the poor. However, the problem is not always a lack of money but of politics, economics, and corruption.
This is why I believe we need to export more than food, but also the American system of capitalism. We must begin to empower these people to feed and care for themselves. They are able to do now because of their government.
The dumbing DOWN of the modern conservative movement . . . Buckley Goldwater Nixon's Southern Strategy Reagan (TALK) Limbaugh (MORE talk) Tom DeLay Bush/Cheney Palin And 90+% of these DIMWITS continue to ask "What would Reagan/Limbaugh do?" This is NOT the party of Lincoln, that's for sure.
No one asks what would Reagan or Limbaugh would do. Conservatives are PRINCIPLE DRIVEN people, not POLITICS DRIVEN, like Democrats. Only a liberal Democrats can justify killing over 30 million unborn children through intellectual sophistication. The problem is that are still dead, and their blood is on your party's hands.
unborn children? do you know how retarded that sounds?
Women kill millions of fetus' everyday without abortions, its called spontaneous miscarriage. Now are you calling that murder? it is an "unborn child" right? not just some defective pool of crap in a womb.
If believe that though, give me $500,000 and ill give you a tree farm worth millions! it's only a few pine cones... or "unborn trees" rather, but act quick cause this deal won't last.
You cannot equate the natural process of the body with the intentional killing of an unborn child. It is not intellectually or morally the same.
The fact that you even suggest a similarity between a pine cone and a human child shows how desperate your thought process is. The pine cone only grows if it is planted in the ground. If cut off a sapling, you are killing a tree.
Right because it's not natural to want the best for yourself and your children. You seem to hold a fertilized egg above the welfare of both mother and child. You'd rather a couple of children run off and make a baby leaving them at the bottom of the educational and economic level of society. Not to mention the overwhelming risks to the ill-planned child you've just forced into their empty hands. Yes, that fertilized egg is sure to have a wonderful life, good thing they couldn't wait.
That might have worked in the beginning. You know that whole "every child - a wanted child!". Now after 30 million unborn children killed, we still have poverty and child abuse and neglect.
I hold life of tremendous value, especially innocent life. I would rather children did not run off and have babies, but that is a false choice. They don't have to run off and have sex at the drop of hat. I know it is old fashion but abstinence works every times it is tried.
Exactly, we still have poverty child abuse and neglect, yet you still want more child for high risk groups??
The world has enough problems without more dysfunctional people to require extra resources.
And if you've looked at abstinence seriously and objectively, you would know it's a great theory without any effective application, it simply fails in comparison to education and planned parenthood.
If that is your rational, then we should start shooting all those children in the "high risk groups". If murder is your answer, then lets be efficient and go after the source, not the symptom.
Abstinence works every time it is tried. Your "education" is not working at all. Great comment about resources! You will serve well on the Obama death panels.
Do you really need a comparison between a fertilized egg and an infant? If you don't know, why don't you learn some biology before regurgitating baseless opinions.
Your limited knowledge about abstinence is also baffling, you are a proponent of it, yet you are ignorant of how unsuccessful it is. You can sit on a podium and preach how it should be done, but when you get down to it, teenagers still have sex, which results in higher pregnancy rates because they are ignorant about birth control.
Biology has never been the issue. There is no disagreement about when LIFE begins. The only issue has been when does life have VALUE. A fertilized egg is not the same as an infant, anymore than an infant is the same as a teenager.
I have forgotten more about abstinence than you will ever know. I know it works when taught properly. We have done the whole education on birth control and still have unwanted pregnancies.
You have to face the inconvenient truth that you support death.
when is the conceptus viable??? and, why have there been an estimated 79 million spontaneous or "god" abortions over the last decade alone?
why is "god" an abortion-ist? it's no wonder or surprise to me anyway that you know a great deal about abstinence and .... almost nothing about embryology or developmental biology. Why are there millions of embryos cryogenically suspended in liquid nitrogen in IVF clinics? what happens to the embryos not chosen for IVF?
You are not God. Conception is more than just a fertilized egg. There is a natural process by which children are conceived and born. To claim that God is an abortionist is foolish. You support killing unborn children. You cannot cloud the issue with useless numbers or talk of embryology. We are not talking about embryos in a clinic. We are talking about a living human being in a mother's womb that is being intentional killed for nothing more than convenience.
and you obviously don't know about the studies in New Mexico where they tried to push an abstinence education program in the public schools through Bush's faith based initiatives program ...... and failed miserably ....... teen pregnancy rates were going down ...... that is until President Goober from Texas started listening to the prolife zealots .....
we have a world with over 6.8 billion people, not exactly an endangered species ........ this coupled with over 210 million orphans and abandoned children makes your argument ridiculous ........ and the abstinence argument is not supported by the statistics
who pays for all of these unwanted children that end up institutionalized for a lifetime??
Depends on whose statistics you use and how the class is taught.
Should we just shoot the 210 million orphans because they are a burden on society? Could it be that by devaluing the life of an unborn child, we have devalued the lives of all children? Just face the fact that you are supporting the murder of an unborn child for nothing more noble than the convenience of a woman. That is the plain ugly truth of the matter.
My point was and has always been if you can justify killing an unborn child to prevent starving orphans, why not end their suffering and kill them at age 2,3,4 or 10. You either value their lives or you don't.
So a family can support one child, but they become pregnant. They know they cannot support two children, so instead of bearing a child and watching it suffer from neglect and malnutrition they get an abortion.
However, in your sick world, you would force them to allow a child to develop, one that can think and breathe and feel, instead of preventing organic material to develop, they all suffer now because you believe its right to value the potential of an egg over sentient life.
What is "they become pregnant"? It requires an intentional act to become pregnant. If they are irresponsible, I am not making them to anything.
In your sick world, an unborn child is "organic material". A life is a life. The distinction of "sentient" life is without a difference. You are killing a child, never the less.
Look, you cannot justify murdering over 30 million unborn children with the few cases of conception during rape. However, even in the case of rape, you are still killing a child because of something the father did. That is wrong.
embryos are not children. and in your world you care more about embryos than you do living, breathing human beings. save an embryo, neglect the child ..... typical irrational MALE religious lunatic.
now don't you have a women's clinic to bomb or a doctor to murder?? dumb reactionary
he's a typical Palin loving dumb hubristic reactionary who really only cares about three issues .... guns, abortion, religion ....... save an embryo, neglect the living
Apparently Mr Delay hasnt thought ahead.--or maybe he's convinced that if he ends up in prison it will be a white-collar, republican, family values prison.
Proof, once again, that a right wing Repugnican lizard, is another hypocritical, closeted gay man.
Nothing wrong with being gay, but to bash something and be that same thing, whether it be a sexual orientation, political group, or social position, is TRES Douchey.
You can NOT watch this and not see that Tommy is a little lite in the loafers.
This video just made him Cell Block bitch when he finally gets locked up.....
i disagree -- any respectable gay man would not go on national television and be that bad at dancing. Would rock hudson or elton john or even liberace dance that bad? I think not! I think delay is gay for pay -- he blows larry craig for jacksons and secretly likes it but is not man enough to be gay.
What the hell does "fail" mean? Where the hell does it come from? Sounds to me like something teens might use in high school, or something coming from someone like Paris Hilton. "fail"?
Fail means....you failed. I learned the word from a dictionary as a young child. I know they don't have many dictionaries in North Carolina but assure you that these books do exist and found within them the word "fail."
Of course, that was nothing compared to what he did to Sarah Palin. Everybody has probably already seen this, but then again, the classics never get old.
Blitzer is also a moron. Did you see him get clobbered by Andy Richter on Celebrity Jeopardy, $68 000 to negative $4500? I haven't felt so much pity for a so-called "news man" since that Ted Baxter character from the old Mary Tyler Moore Show.
His criminal charges are small potatoes. Read about his role in the Reagan revolution and the K st. mall project to get the real dirt. He's the classic "True Believer", who can righteously justify anything in the name of God and or the Republican party.
Tom Delay is under prosecution in texas for laundering money from corporations for campaign financing. For some reason texas is so corrupt and/or backed up it hasn't gone to court and the charges are 5 yrs old.
* Genuflect to enemies & betray allies. * Triple spending rate under Powers NOT Enumerated. * Surrendering to Islamic crusaders on missile defense. * Lawless expansions of federal gov't & spending. * Thwarting nuclear power industry. * Federal mandates & tax schemes backed by scientific hoaxes. * Betraying classified programs & boasting about it. * Criminalizing the act of national defense. * Establishing rules that guarantee USA loses. * Criminalizing the opposition party. Obama bin Liable
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
wow -- someones got too much time on their hands. good to know my tax dollars are going to keep crazies like you alive with socialized medicare. seniors and the internet are kind of like drinking and driving. they just don't mix unless you are an urbane liberal and take cabs.
i know lots of seniors that i love very much. they don't send rightwing forwards during their retirement -- they do constructive things. i don't tolerate intolerant people. its a fools game. you can die any time and i would not care. bye.
arguing with you is moot. when i travel old people are so nice and respected -- in part because they don't launch crazy pants talking points and contradict logic every opportunity they are given. i am always amazed at the senors in this country crying "ME ME ME ME" -- medicare and other social programs for seniors and only for seniors. selfish old bullies. i hope some disaster puts you out of your obvious misery relatively quickly and painlessly. nobody should have to suffer like you do.
"ME ME ME ME" -- selfish is as selfish does, genius.
"
Bleeding Heart Tightwads
... households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals.
"
-- nytimes. com Dec 2008
Your political kind is a living lie. Always posing as generous, but only with OTHER PEOPLE's earnings.
Compassion, in Democrat-speak, is being generous with other people's earnings for your own gain, whether politically, socially, financially, or a combination thereof. Applied to their political leaders, that means "big pimping", as they say.
would you die already? i guess there really is no rest for the wicked. get a job or something. even though with your limited skill set and bad disposition even being a walmart greeter is out of your league. being a contrary jerk on youtube isn't very constructive. you could always just lick rush limbaughs butt some more -- you know you like it. he does too. old gay men in love. thats nice.
Given their nanny-state politics are so far out of whack with American ideals, it appears the ONLY way ANY Democrat would EVER win ANY election is if they formed the largest, richest labor price-fixing cartel in human history, and controlled a federal monopoly of compulsory training facilities from which they'd proselytize their political mysticism to successive generations of everyone's children for 12+ years each.
your tin foil hat went and shrunk up and sqeezed all your brains out kind of the same way a packet of mayonnaise squishes when you step on it. but mayonnaise is french and socialist so i guess you wouldn't know. i now understand just how certifiably crazy the right wing is now. thank you.
If anyone other than Michelle Bachmann can understand your blather please let me know. start a mayonnaise boycott too.
Have your parents sue whatever teachers' labor union defrauded your parents out of all that tax money they paid, assuming they payed taxes. They have a strong case.
no in other words you are probably the dumbest person on earth and arguing with you is pointless. you and are a hack with a bunch of talking points that won't shut up.
William F Buckley once made a wise comment about neocons -- they annoyed him because they didn't have great educations and they thought they knew everything. i am sure he had more to say but he was being nice. Its fitting isn't it. so go out and wave your misspelled signs at some teabagging social. good night.
* Tea-bagging -- a specific sex act between two homosexual men in a lifestyle the Democrat party federally sponsors and teaches to everyone's children.
* Tea Party -- Americans protesting the Democrat party's lawless expansions of the federal government.
Do DISCRIMINATE between the two. Seriously, at least attempt lucidity. 2010 isn't that far off.
DUDE I don't want to focus on you engaged in gay sex acts. Thats just nasty. If its your thing go for it but you don't have to share teabagging stories with everyone else. TMI.
A whining fool shouting loudly for liberty but not willing to pay the bill.
After most American workers saw more money in their paycheck due to the lower tax rate, the teabaggers at Fox News railed against high taxes, but did not discuss how much Jesus hated hypocrisy.
Delay goes to prison. Charlie Rangal gets chastised & remains in Congress. Any wonder there is division in America??
Democrats are some CORRUPT motherfuckers!!
flyboymd82 1 year ago
I would take the "rights of the fetus" crowd (which is certainly legitimate) far more seriously If I also heard them addressing issues that are easily preventable, such the 15mil. children who die a year from treatable diseases. Are they calling for the USA to increase its foreign aid, which is the most miserly of any developed nation? That would go a a very long way in protecting innocent life, and shouldn't be controversial.
idigdirt1 2 years ago
I am not sure what you mean by "miserly". Our foreign aid is more than any other nation on earth in addition to private charities that work around the world. Over 25 billion in 2007.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
USAs aid, in terms of percentage of their GNP has almost always been lower than any other industrialized nation in the world, though paradoxically since 2000, their dollar amount has been the highest.The point is we are in a much greater position to give more and every industrialized nation give a higher percentage of their GNP than we do.
idigdirt1 2 years ago
Not when you combine it with the private and religious aid that is given throughout the world.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
I was referring to the US gov't, i should have been more clear. You surely are in favor of us giving a higher percentage of our GNP to avert preventable disease and death, i assume, to protect innocent life. Pro choice does not mena pro abortion, it means keeping safe and legal as they are going to be performed in back alley ways otherwise. The efficacy of abstinence only education is known to be low. just google it.
idigdirt1 2 years ago
You cannot justify death by relating to other deaths. Many deaths are preventable but that does not justify intentional murder.
Pro-life means pro-death. You support killing an unborn child for the convenience of a woman.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
Not justifying anything. I agree w you as far the rights of the fetus are concerned. When you begin to express moral outrage over a subject where there are no conflicting values (treating lethal cases of diarrhea for pennies a day) then I can take you seriously about issues that are complicated, such as abortion. I would prefer zero abortions a year, but I also feel it needs to be safe and legal. There are conflicting values at play,as is often the case in complicated issues.
idigdirt1 2 years ago
Respectfully, there are no conflicting values. You either value the life of the child or you don't. I agree with you that more needs to be done around the world for the poor. However, the problem is not always a lack of money but of politics, economics, and corruption.
This is why I believe we need to export more than food, but also the American system of capitalism. We must begin to empower these people to feed and care for themselves. They are able to do now because of their government.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
On the contrary. I suspect Tom DeLay will be one of the predators in prison.
MrGovtCheese 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
i remixed this video with video of tom delay actually dancing.
very funny. please click on my channel to see it.
Adv2k169 2 years ago
Who said republicans were in closet?
IntroToYourPsych 2 years ago
JACK RULES!!......Delay is the typical REPUBLICAN CLOSET FAG,he loves prancing around like the little SISSY BITCH that she is....WHAT A FAG!!
For a queer like Delay...jail is not punishment...it's PARTY IN MY ASS TIME...AND EVERYONES INVITED!!
HUMANSAREBENEATHME 2 years ago
RonPaulGeorgeRingo 2 years ago 2
No one asks what would Reagan or Limbaugh would do. Conservatives are PRINCIPLE DRIVEN people, not POLITICS DRIVEN, like Democrats. Only a liberal Democrats can justify killing over 30 million unborn children through intellectual sophistication. The problem is that are still dead, and their blood is on your party's hands.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
unborn children? do you know how retarded that sounds?
Women kill millions of fetus' everyday without abortions, its called spontaneous miscarriage. Now are you calling that murder? it is an "unborn child" right? not just some defective pool of crap in a womb.
If believe that though, give me $500,000 and ill give you a tree farm worth millions! it's only a few pine cones... or "unborn trees" rather, but act quick cause this deal won't last.
Gelandri 2 years ago
You cannot equate the natural process of the body with the intentional killing of an unborn child. It is not intellectually or morally the same.
The fact that you even suggest a similarity between a pine cone and a human child shows how desperate your thought process is. The pine cone only grows if it is planted in the ground. If cut off a sapling, you are killing a tree.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
Right because it's not natural to want the best for yourself and your children. You seem to hold a fertilized egg above the welfare of both mother and child. You'd rather a couple of children run off and make a baby leaving them at the bottom of the educational and economic level of society. Not to mention the overwhelming risks to the ill-planned child you've just forced into their empty hands. Yes, that fertilized egg is sure to have a wonderful life, good thing they couldn't wait.
Gelandri 2 years ago
That might have worked in the beginning. You know that whole "every child - a wanted child!". Now after 30 million unborn children killed, we still have poverty and child abuse and neglect.
I hold life of tremendous value, especially innocent life. I would rather children did not run off and have babies, but that is a false choice. They don't have to run off and have sex at the drop of hat. I know it is old fashion but abstinence works every times it is tried.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
Exactly, we still have poverty child abuse and neglect, yet you still want more child for high risk groups??
The world has enough problems without more dysfunctional people to require extra resources.
And if you've looked at abstinence seriously and objectively, you would know it's a great theory without any effective application, it simply fails in comparison to education and planned parenthood.
Gelandri 2 years ago
If that is your rational, then we should start shooting all those children in the "high risk groups". If murder is your answer, then lets be efficient and go after the source, not the symptom.
Abstinence works every time it is tried. Your "education" is not working at all. Great comment about resources! You will serve well on the Obama death panels.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
Do you really need a comparison between a fertilized egg and an infant? If you don't know, why don't you learn some biology before regurgitating baseless opinions.
Your limited knowledge about abstinence is also baffling, you are a proponent of it, yet you are ignorant of how unsuccessful it is. You can sit on a podium and preach how it should be done, but when you get down to it, teenagers still have sex, which results in higher pregnancy rates because they are ignorant about birth control.
Gelandri 2 years ago
Biology has never been the issue. There is no disagreement about when LIFE begins. The only issue has been when does life have VALUE. A fertilized egg is not the same as an infant, anymore than an infant is the same as a teenager.
I have forgotten more about abstinence than you will ever know. I know it works when taught properly. We have done the whole education on birth control and still have unwanted pregnancies.
You have to face the inconvenient truth that you support death.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
when is the conceptus viable??? and, why have there been an estimated 79 million spontaneous or "god" abortions over the last decade alone?
why is "god" an abortion-ist? it's no wonder or surprise to me anyway that you know a great deal about abstinence and .... almost nothing about embryology or developmental biology. Why are there millions of embryos cryogenically suspended in liquid nitrogen in IVF clinics? what happens to the embryos not chosen for IVF?
talk about inconvenient truths
perfectbark 2 years ago
You are not God. Conception is more than just a fertilized egg. There is a natural process by which children are conceived and born. To claim that God is an abortionist is foolish. You support killing unborn children. You cannot cloud the issue with useless numbers or talk of embryology. We are not talking about embryos in a clinic. We are talking about a living human being in a mother's womb that is being intentional killed for nothing more than convenience.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
and you obviously don't know about the studies in New Mexico where they tried to push an abstinence education program in the public schools through Bush's faith based initiatives program ...... and failed miserably ....... teen pregnancy rates were going down ...... that is until President Goober from Texas started listening to the prolife zealots .....
perfectbark 2 years ago
by the way ....... what state has the highest rate of teen pregnancies per capita in the nation?? ..........
perfectbark 2 years ago
we have a world with over 6.8 billion people, not exactly an endangered species ........ this coupled with over 210 million orphans and abandoned children makes your argument ridiculous ........ and the abstinence argument is not supported by the statistics
who pays for all of these unwanted children that end up institutionalized for a lifetime??
perfectbark 2 years ago
Depends on whose statistics you use and how the class is taught.
Should we just shoot the 210 million orphans because they are a burden on society? Could it be that by devaluing the life of an unborn child, we have devalued the lives of all children? Just face the fact that you are supporting the murder of an unborn child for nothing more noble than the convenience of a woman. That is the plain ugly truth of the matter.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
convenience of a women...
So its clear now you know zero about abortion and why its used
Zero about biology and "when life begins"
Zero about abstinence programs and their failures
So... why are you still talking?
And if abortions are allowed, how does that mean we have to go shoot orphans now? You've brought up shooting them a couple of times now...
Gelandri 2 years ago
Only your mind....
My point was and has always been if you can justify killing an unborn child to prevent starving orphans, why not end their suffering and kill them at age 2,3,4 or 10. You either value their lives or you don't.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
So a family can support one child, but they become pregnant. They know they cannot support two children, so instead of bearing a child and watching it suffer from neglect and malnutrition they get an abortion.
However, in your sick world, you would force them to allow a child to develop, one that can think and breathe and feel, instead of preventing organic material to develop, they all suffer now because you believe its right to value the potential of an egg over sentient life.
Gelandri 2 years ago
What is "they become pregnant"? It requires an intentional act to become pregnant. If they are irresponsible, I am not making them to anything.
In your sick world, an unborn child is "organic material". A life is a life. The distinction of "sentient" life is without a difference. You are killing a child, never the less.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
An intentional act such as rape?
idigdirt1 2 years ago
Look, you cannot justify murdering over 30 million unborn children with the few cases of conception during rape. However, even in the case of rape, you are still killing a child because of something the father did. That is wrong.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
embryos are not children. and in your world you care more about embryos than you do living, breathing human beings. save an embryo, neglect the child ..... typical irrational MALE religious lunatic.
now don't you have a women's clinic to bomb or a doctor to murder?? dumb reactionary
perfectbark 2 years ago
I never said an embryos is a child.
You are presenting a false choice. Either I favor murdering an unborn child or I must be supporting child neglect. Talk about irrational.
You have supported the murder of over 30 million unborn children in America alone. How has that help the plight of children? Not at all.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
he's a typical Palin loving dumb hubristic reactionary who really only cares about three issues .... guns, abortion, religion ....... save an embryo, neglect the living
perfectbark 2 years ago
embryos are not children scott roeder .......
perfectbark 2 years ago
Tom DeLay will make some bubba a nice little prison bitch. Hopefully.
SabuPtolemy 2 years ago 2
The republican party is so vibrant latey, I love it!
bundlesjr 2 years ago
Jack Cafferty: The best thing about CNN.
guiltybob1 2 years ago 6
so true
camsotherstuff 2 years ago
jack you nail it right on
repuptalkgood 2 years ago
Embarrassing to Sugarland, and Texas. Tom go away......
SlowRealization 2 years ago 2
Apparently Mr Delay hasnt thought ahead.--or maybe he's convinced that if he ends up in prison it will be a white-collar, republican, family values prison.
beelzabubbleboy 2 years ago 2
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Cafferty - the rectal cavity of CNN...
TimeForTimer 2 years ago
....and Jack is not kidding.
ecoflame 2 years ago
Proof, once again, that a right wing Repugnican lizard, is another hypocritical, closeted gay man.
Nothing wrong with being gay, but to bash something and be that same thing, whether it be a sexual orientation, political group, or social position, is TRES Douchey.
You can NOT watch this and not see that Tommy is a little lite in the loafers.
This video just made him Cell Block bitch when he finally gets locked up.....
Whatta maroon!
ROOKTABULA 2 years ago
i disagree -- any respectable gay man would not go on national television and be that bad at dancing. Would rock hudson or elton john or even liberace dance that bad? I think not! I think delay is gay for pay -- he blows larry craig for jacksons and secretly likes it but is not man enough to be gay.
gisforgary 2 years ago
hahahahaha.....
PersonalJesus348 2 years ago
Jack is so ornery. lol
SquallCloud 2 years ago 4
Jack Cafferty is the best
oldtownkid 2 years ago 12
fail
kraksc 2 years ago
What the hell does "fail" mean? Where the hell does it come from? Sounds to me like something teens might use in high school, or something coming from someone like Paris Hilton. "fail"?
oldtownkid 2 years ago
lol! its the opposite of pass, u know like all the grades u got in highschool.
charbroiledmonk1033 2 years ago
Fail means....you failed. I learned the word from a dictionary as a young child. I know they don't have many dictionaries in North Carolina but assure you that these books do exist and found within them the word "fail."
andrewh23 2 years ago
are you really that stupid, pal?
oldtownkid 2 years ago
Jack Cafferty, never ever retire.
someperson111 2 years ago 11
Classic Jack Cafferty! Love it!
DixieDale 2 years ago 5
Of course, that was nothing compared to what he did to Sarah Palin. Everybody has probably already seen this, but then again, the classics never get old.
watch?v=BcQMycB8oZw
TrollBuster9090 2 years ago 6
exposing criminals
NatureLegalized 2 years ago 2
I think you're confusing DeLay with Vitter, Foley, and Craig.
TrollBuster9090 2 years ago
LOL and doesn't that list go on & on & on...CLEAN SWEEP!
NatureLegalized 2 years ago
Yeah, but not all of them are criminals who "expose" themselves. The Republican "Pervert Squad" is a very select group.
TrollBuster9090 2 years ago
lol
KennyTheQuad 2 years ago
Blitzer is such a wuss
nutdao 2 years ago 3
Blitzer is also a moron. Did you see him get clobbered by Andy Richter on Celebrity Jeopardy, $68 000 to negative $4500? I haven't felt so much pity for a so-called "news man" since that Ted Baxter character from the old Mary Tyler Moore Show.
TrollBuster9090 2 years ago 3
and he smells bad too..
pwl1980 2 years ago
That's because he's a sheep in Wolf's clothing.
TrollBuster9090 2 years ago
U mean shit in Wolf's clothing?
pwl1980 2 years ago
ROFL
macks3123 2 years ago
If a picture of him hitting a bong in '95 surfaced, he'd be kicked off the show.
I guess massive political corruption is ok, as long as you do it for the RIGHT reasons, and the RIGHT people.
Btw...he dances like Hank Hill on an Cocaine/Ecstasy/Botox cocktail.
facelesshorseman 2 years ago 8
Wow, that was harsh....
DeletedDelusion 2 years ago
Caffery's AWESOME!
kelseywall 2 years ago 12
DeLay will be danceing with his cellmate soon.
OhioDemocrat 2 years ago 7
Zlatan Ibrahimović
WKaliberr 2 years ago
I know american politicians like to screw small children (especially the right wing ones) but what did Tom DeLay do?
notscooter952 2 years ago
His criminal charges are small potatoes. Read about his role in the Reagan revolution and the K st. mall project to get the real dirt. He's the classic "True Believer", who can righteously justify anything in the name of God and or the Republican party.
facelesshorseman 2 years ago 3
Tom Delay is under prosecution in texas for laundering money from corporations for campaign financing. For some reason texas is so corrupt and/or backed up it hasn't gone to court and the charges are 5 yrs old.
gisforgary 2 years ago
TylerNull 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
wow -- someones got too much time on their hands. good to know my tax dollars are going to keep crazies like you alive with socialized medicare. seniors and the internet are kind of like drinking and driving. they just don't mix unless you are an urbane liberal and take cabs.
gisforgary 2 years ago
The disdain you express for "seniors" is shining through crystal clear.
You might want to tone it down, at least until your messiah dupes them into surrendering unto HIM their medical decisions.
"Wow" indeed.
TylerNull 2 years ago
i know lots of seniors that i love very much. they don't send rightwing forwards during their retirement -- they do constructive things. i don't tolerate intolerant people. its a fools game. you can die any time and i would not care. bye.
gisforgary 2 years ago
"i don't tolerate intolerant people"
What you don't tolerate is people who dissent from your politics. Again, your point is loud and clear.
Democrats & Fascism -- Life Partners
TylerNull 2 years ago
arguing with you is moot. when i travel old people are so nice and respected -- in part because they don't launch crazy pants talking points and contradict logic every opportunity they are given. i am always amazed at the senors in this country crying "ME ME ME ME" -- medicare and other social programs for seniors and only for seniors. selfish old bullies. i hope some disaster puts you out of your obvious misery relatively quickly and painlessly. nobody should have to suffer like you do.
gisforgary 2 years ago
"ME ME ME ME" -- selfish is as selfish does, genius.
"
Bleeding Heart Tightwads
... households headed by conservatives give 30 percent more to charity than households headed by liberals. A study by Google found an even greater disproportion: average annual contributions reported by conservatives were almost double those of liberals.
"
-- nytimes. com Dec 2008
Your political kind is a living lie. Always posing as generous, but only with OTHER PEOPLE's earnings.
Democrat = GREED
TylerNull 2 years ago
oh oh -- get angrier -- have a heart attack -- rip.
gisforgary 2 years ago
Your blather isn't much of a rebuttal, is it?
"Racketeering Is as Racketeering Does"
"
Compassion, in Democrat-speak, is being generous with other people's earnings for your own gain, whether politically, socially, financially, or a combination thereof. Applied to their political leaders, that means "big pimping", as they say.
"
TylerNull 2 years ago
would you die already? i guess there really is no rest for the wicked. get a job or something. even though with your limited skill set and bad disposition even being a walmart greeter is out of your league. being a contrary jerk on youtube isn't very constructive. you could always just lick rush limbaughs butt some more -- you know you like it. he does too. old gay men in love. thats nice.
gisforgary 2 years ago
Contrary?
Given their nanny-state politics are so far out of whack with American ideals, it appears the ONLY way ANY Democrat would EVER win ANY election is if they formed the largest, richest labor price-fixing cartel in human history, and controlled a federal monopoly of compulsory training facilities from which they'd proselytize their political mysticism to successive generations of everyone's children for 12+ years each.
Oh, wait, they did all that already!
TylerNull 2 years ago
your tin foil hat went and shrunk up and sqeezed all your brains out kind of the same way a packet of mayonnaise squishes when you step on it. but mayonnaise is french and socialist so i guess you wouldn't know. i now understand just how certifiably crazy the right wing is now. thank you.
If anyone other than Michelle Bachmann can understand your blather please let me know. start a mayonnaise boycott too.
gisforgary 2 years ago
In other words, you have NO rebuttal.
Have your parents sue whatever teachers' labor union defrauded your parents out of all that tax money they paid, assuming they payed taxes. They have a strong case.
TylerNull 2 years ago
no in other words you are probably the dumbest person on earth and arguing with you is pointless. you and are a hack with a bunch of talking points that won't shut up.
William F Buckley once made a wise comment about neocons -- they annoyed him because they didn't have great educations and they thought they knew everything. i am sure he had more to say but he was being nice. Its fitting isn't it. so go out and wave your misspelled signs at some teabagging social. good night.
gisforgary 2 years ago
FOCUS:
* Tea-bagging -- a specific sex act between two homosexual men in a lifestyle the Democrat party federally sponsors and teaches to everyone's children.
* Tea Party -- Americans protesting the Democrat party's lawless expansions of the federal government.
Do DISCRIMINATE between the two. Seriously, at least attempt lucidity. 2010 isn't that far off.
Now go back to sleep.
TylerNull 2 years ago
DUDE I don't want to focus on you engaged in gay sex acts. Thats just nasty. If its your thing go for it but you don't have to share teabagging stories with everyone else. TMI.
gisforgary 2 years ago
teabagger
A whining fool shouting loudly for liberty but not willing to pay the bill.
After most American workers saw more money in their paycheck due to the lower tax rate, the teabaggers at Fox News railed against high taxes, but did not discuss how much Jesus hated hypocrisy.
perfectbark 2 years ago
I love liberty and I will gladly pay MY BILL. I just don't want to be paying for the lazy and shiftless of our society.
CommonSenseJoe 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
first
mindslaves 2 years ago