@mr suicideman...the question raised in a long way is "does light have a chance of traveling faster than 186k per sec do to the gravitational terminal velocity of being sucked into a black hole?"
so the otherside becomes a star past the event horizon, and all the matter being sucked in is then compressed and forms at the closest star.. which then unifies all the other principles about how each galaxy remains seperate but linear if each star in universe corrisponds, im sorry but you did try this before and the readings were inconclusive as the probe was crushed and destroyed and the signal was lost, in fact everytime you have done this it's failed, im not crazy we stuck in temporal paradi
I have a teory but its not quite perfect due to actual knowladge of me:
well can the light speed change due to deformations of space(ex: blackhole)?
And since the velocity can me measure with v=deltaX/deltaT when the actuall deltaX is bended and the time is change cuz of the gravitational field will it stay with the same speed? or will it increase with a prespective outside of the black hole gravitational field but still remain the same speed(insde the field (due to the space-time changes) ?
Einstein was the greatest scientist world had ever seen! if he couldve lived a little longer he would ve solved the puzzle of grand unification and theory of everything!
"@dunkhead...gavity is caused by elementary charges of the four stable particles electron (e), positron (p), proton (P) and elton (E = "antiproton").
This is total bullshite. Gravity is NOT created by any elementary particle! Gravity is the attraction between two elements that have MASS! If two rocks could be thrown into space very, very close to each other...they would soon attract one another because of their miniscule gravitational attraction for each other.
at 5:36 WTF ? "And detect particles of time left over from the beginning of the Universe"... what ???? is this English? Particles of time? We detect them ?? Never heard of such things...
@supremeon1 You've heard how light from distant stars takes years to travel to earth? Scientist pick up that light, analyse its spectrum that tells things about the matter (star/planet) that this light came from. But since we assume that travel through space won't change the light it tells us about the time when it started its journey. Different stars at different distances from earth take different time to travel and so tell about different times. Particles of time that tell about matter ...
@peterm3964 Its because of a time rate of change of the gravitational field of a energy - momentum distribution. If the space - time metric describing the gravitational field changes with time then it produces gravitational waves a lot like electromagnetic waves.
friend this is simple as that of cyclone but cyclone form because of differential of pressure and black hole are because of gravity. now dont waste time and get together for betterment of life present on earth
friend this is simple as that of cyclone but cyclone form because of differential of pressure and black hole are because of gravity. now dont waste time and get together for batterment of life present on earth
REAL Free energy technology exists!But the Oil companies want these technologies unknown to the masses,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
its simple the answer Einstein think how to shorten the space that travel through time by using speed of light, that no necessary longer than the light years far from apart like planets that turns back time light speed is faster than the sound and bullet, in the solar system you can see star but its light because it so far like billions of year but if you using the light speed you can travel in shorter time that is Einstein thinking how to build that thing!
how can you search for something like black holes when you can´t reach it?. why don´t you explore how to make a item then or anything nearby the earth? and why MOST you search a life out of the planet earth? if we can find life then i most be out of our solar system. And.... you know that evrey planet we visit and make life there will be destoryed of CO2 and such.
@davyro66 i dont think einstein wld be in the band tesla. it wld sound very werid. heavy metal songs about math eh dont think so.....lol.....i know ur tlkn bout the guy tesla got their name from
@johnedwardthomas No they didn't like each other at all,Tesla used to always question Einstein's theory of relativity.Tesla always maintained that Einstein had got his equations wrong,obviously Einstein didn't like this so they used to have big public disagreements.One thing that was for sure though was Tesla understood the Earth's electro-gravity fields better than anyone & Einstein knew his physics better than anyone,work it out if you can i know its confusing.
@davyro66 It is, but to make discoveries you need to internalize your area of specialization and be in years of researching. "Sharing opinions" ,as they guy who i replied stated, was not going to exchange years and years of scrutinizing in their individual areas.
But don't worry, as math has showed us, nothing is 100% certain, so who knows what might happened. But then again, Einstein was exposed to plenty of brilliant scientists.
“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.”-tesla-
The REAL answer to ALL these questions lie in something I do not see being studied scientifically. Awareness! what is awareness , that is who we really are and everything that "exists" or doesn't really exist is a product of this unknown quantity.
@jagg1951 exactly - suptle form of energy the ether They forgot to include the observer into their equations and only saw the observed. matter and energy occupy the same space and time is an illusion that things are not happing all at once. it is motion that gives us a sense of change movement through time but if time move at the speed of light it slow down. their is an inner space and an outer space and they are only looking at the outer space -left the observer out of their equations
again fools for not puting spirtual sense into thought because you will never figure it all out without god because really i believe dark matter is thought of god and all life. Some things just cant be proven and thats what jesus was saying about faith
again fools for not puting spirtual sense into thought because you will never figure it all out without god because really i believe dark matter is thought of god and all life. Some things just cant be proven and thats what jesus was saying about faith
again fools for not puting spirtual sense into thought because you will never figure it all out without god because really i believe dark matter is thought of god and all life. and if you see it how will you know what its doing
@TylerThrashPeace . All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena." I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." — Nikola Tesla
its all theory!! none of its proven and scientist keep changing their minds, so Eienstien was another bullshiter, plus he sed te universe WASN'T, yes he said it wasn't expanding, so there you go!
if things were going faster than the speed of light than they would just be missing the light that would have hit it and be invisible because the light would not reflect back to our eye. if you were in a car floating through space at the speed of light than what would happen if you turned on your headlights?
Everything is energy, connected to the Highest consciousness..Christians call God. God is energy=light and sound. This energy descends through dimensions, down to the 3rd some are still dwelling within. What is perceived as material is actually light and sound vibrating at incredible rates in order to ascend or vibrate lower-descend into dense matter. Consciousness, thoughts are energy in which expands the universe. This creates more universe. Energy continues to expand, therefore, so do we.
@Alearia3 "Everything is energy" is not true: The masses of electron (e) and proton (P), m(e) and m(P), can not be identified with, and can not be converted in energy! Black holes do not exists, the gravity is caused by elemenary (and invariant) gravitational charges
g(k) = {- g m(e), + g m(e), + g m(P), - g m(P)}
of the electron (e), positron (p), proton (P) and the elton (E). If the electromagnetic interaction is attractive between particles, the gravity is repusive.
@gyulaszasz what is gravity? genuinly curious n no one seems to be able to answer it in a way that fullfills my mind frankly i dnt ge the maths, but the pure physics blows my mind n i luv it p.s. on my way to a physics degree so would luv an explination
"Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were a closed-up mass (ratqan), then We clove them asunder (fataqna)? And We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" Al-Qur'an 21:31
I believe that there are other universes orbiting around each other giving the current view on the vastness of space a extra push to infinity. Maybe that is an explanation why deep space objects are moving away from our cosmic center of origin at speeds faster then ligt. + that gamma ray instruments indicated signals of light that are far beyond the current known edge of 14billion light years far beyond our universe based on our current observations
However its hard for me accept that the universe started from a single point. How did that point appear? Into what is space expanding? If the universe is growing that means its not infinite, hence there has to be something beyond it.
The big bang and expansion theories rise more questions than they solve.
Yes the expansion has been measured, however since we dont know the dimensions of the universe the expansion could be just as "local" phenomena.
nobody claims to know what happened before the big bang, or how it happened. he simply infer from our observations, like any intelligent person would. we see all galaxies in the sky moving away from one another, so if time is reversed, they will all be moving towards one another. turn back time enough, and logically the universe may have formed a singularity. this observation coupled with our knowledge of gravity, quantum physics, and the CMBR, allow us to infer that something like a big bang
The thing is that no one knows why the galaxies move and for how long. Maybe in a couple trillion years they will move closer and then further again.
As you will notice no object in space has a constant distance to another. Thus, as i said, it could be just a local phenomena.
The Big Bang is just an assumption to have a starting point.
A Big Bang might have happened indeed, but that doesnt mean it created the universe as its presented. This, for the universe, could also be just a local event.
time and space are human made terminologies, they dont exist.
I highly doubt space has a size or an age. If it has an age, what was before that? Where did the big bang come from? God's fart? Bullshit. All those theories arise from the simple human need to have a start point.
Even the expanding space theory.. what is it expanding into?
By me its just a local (for the space measure) event. As we see objects move away from each other here, somewhere else the opposite might happen. We dont know.
Actually, the idea of big bang comes from observation, rather than a need for a starting point (which I seem to be lacking--am I special?). Before big bang? Dunno, maybe another universe(s), we don't know--we weren't there, we have no way of knowing. I'll not waste space explaining why we have no way of knowing (at present). No offense, but from what little you said in your comment, you seem to be grossly ignorant when it comes to big bang and the expansion of space.
Yep i dont agree with the big bang theory and age of universe bullshit.
Why? Well, you said it yourself - we dont know anything about the universe. And the "observations" are very local (in the universe scale) and we dont even know the basic structure of it so how can we say its doing this'n'that? The human mind simply cant accept something existing forever and being infinite, thats why these theories emerge.
I refer you to my previous statement regarding your apparent gross ignorance in this matter. Knowing the structure of the universe (which, by the way, we are making strong headway in understanding) is no more a requirement for making statements about the universe that are true than it was for doctors to make statements about the human body before they began to understand DNA-or the subatomic particles that make the body. We often understand how before we understand why.
I havent been able to find anything we "know" about the universe that hasnt been based on theories and hypothesis'. Thus its all assumed not proven/known for fact.
Our understanding of the universe is basically 0. We think a lot but we know nothing.
The hypothesis and theories they give birth to are quite a bit more than anything upon which I see your statements standing. As I mentioned, we often understand the how before they why. Every test against the idea that can be applied to disprove big bang has been applied, with all failing. We observe: universe appears to be growing!\, hypothesis: if it is growing, it had a point at which growth began, theorize: big bang.
Long before we had the tools, when the very technology to test such things hadn't even been a possibility, we were able to use what we know to make predictions about what we would find in our universe (if we had the means to look) if big bang was a realistic model--and as the decades have gone by and technologies advanced, time and time again we have found those very things we predicted we would find.
Getting to the nuts and bolts of your statement, that you haven't found anything that we "know" that isn't based on a theory (I omit hypothesis, as it is superfluous, once a theory has been developed--you would know this, if you were scientifically literate). A theory comes as a result of something we know, and then can be used to surprise us by predicting things we don't know--many of those unknowns have been validated (black hole, as an example).
Continuing on my "nuts and bolts" comment, use the real world situation of Newton. Newton noticed that things fall. He KNOWS things fall through observation. His observations inspire him to hypothesize, and eventually develop a theory.
Now, think about E=mc². Just a theory, but we were able to predict that Earth's gravity would affect they way we experience the flow of time--through a weak little theory. Mighty big prediction--we tested it, and holy crow, it was true! Now we KNOW it.
And so I am left once again referring you to my observation that you are grossly ignorant in this subject; consequently, it renders you incapable of holding a meaningful conversation on the topic. Learn what the word theory means in science, discard what it means out on the street, and try to accept that scientific theory always has and always will be of greater benefit than using wishful thinking and ill-informed fancies of the type that you seem to embrace.
Isnt it obvious for everyone that there is no such thing as time. Its a fact. Time is only an illusion. Its just everything that change. Time is just a tool. We all agree here or?
I think.. a black hole is a "hole" or tear in our universe "Balloon" That when someone or thing goes threw.. they'll just be outside the universe Balloon. lol.. i cant be wrong cuz its what I think.. wawawawa
There can't have been a big bang or something outside our universe. If now the universe is everything that exists. The universe can't expand if it's everything. It has no end and no beginning meaning it can't expand. There is no reason to think about these questions. First we must figure our our own planet...then we take the moon mars...and the rest of the planets. Then the sun, then we can start thinking about these questions..
Think of the universe as a balloon. It doesn't have a beginning, nor an end, and no matter how much you go around on its surface, you will never reach the "end". If you inflate the balloon, it's surface will expand - the same as the universe. It may not have a beginning nor an end, but it can grow bigger.
ok, say the universe is the balloon. In side the balloon it has no end nor beginning so it's everywhere and also a vacuum/perfect space. Vaccuum is defined as a volume of space that's empty and has no weight, so energy = 0. If there's no energy in the perfect space/ vaccuum with no living thing in it, how did you get energy to create the big bang. Could there be something else create somehow an energy for outside the universe that cause the big bang?
**Could there be something else create somehow an energy come from outside the universe that cause the big bang? If you say yes then the universe is not everywhere, it also has a beginning and an end. This is not a statement this is a question.
Assuming the universe being spherical instantly means that its not infinite.
You can infinitely walk around the Earth, it will never end, however it doesnt has infinite volume.
Thus giving space any shape, size or starting point automatically means that something was before and is beyond what we call "space" or "universe". Thus its not infinite and is contained within something else.
And where did all the matter for the bang come from? From:
This is untrue. Energy is in everything, every where, at every time. Energy is merely infinitely condensed "matter". If a vacuum truly made space empty, then we wouldn't be able to perceive it, therefore it would never exist. Just like time past the "Event Horizon" of a blackhole, we can not perceive it, therefore, it is non-existent.
@Neso906: It has a certain limit...........If the expansion crosses that limit then it will burst out... so if u relate the universe as a balloon then we can say that the universe will burst too. Lets say the name of the event is "BIG BOOM".. The universe does have an end.. Because it has a beginning "BIG BANG"... Everything has a beginning & an end (also the UNIVERSE)
the more i think about it, and believe me that's an effort, you would be able to hear the cogs ticking away, but there is a huge lean toward me believing that the universe is a manifestation of the collective conscience of the living beings, as in we created ourselves, its kinda whacked out i know, but not at all impossible, we exist, because we exist, we control more of out physical existence than we think we do
awesomely said..that is a really good theory or belief you have..i kind of co-inside with you on that one..the universe is here because we are here..The act of us looking and believing we create our reality.Very well said.
Fat chance. Today's young people are brought up with just about as much sensitivity to a modern view of science as the Hitler-Jugend with a sensitivity to moral and ethical issues. Remember that Einstein was rejected by the educational system of his time. But he was not completely broken, so he could persevere. The Einstein of today might likely be a poor devil rotting up in Guantanamo or one of its clones.
Existance, time and space never had a beginning. You can learn to accept that, and even grow into understanding it, but helas the human mind can not grasp the absence of limits to time and space.
@LiteWaiter I'm glad to see that i'm not the only one that doesn't think that everything came from nothing. If you believe there was a start to the universe then you HAVE to believe there will be an end to the universe or your theory means absolutely nothing. The big bang is a linear theory which, unless you believe in a higher form of being is just not possible. For someone to even suggest that everything that is came to be in one random event is just absurd.
How matter disrupts from time, and still has an observable dynamic within perceived by a conciousness out of our current universe, is difficult to imagine, and currently inexplicable. Not only because our abstract maths are defining unimaginable reality and not only therefore has a distortion. 1, 0, infinite, minus are a few. minus times plus is minus. An agreement that comes out of a creature that dfines problem the cause, solution the effect. Fighting gravity, dusk till dawn.
my own perception, is that we JUST ARE. Why did something have to have created the universe, why cant it JUST exist, it is what it is, we cant change it, we cant control it, so just buckle up and hang on for the ride lol, as as for what we do know, that there SEEMS to be an edge to the universe, but is it possible that it just goes on even further, but we just cant see it yet, which would suggest the universe is much older than we think it is
The universe is most likely finite, but does not have a convention three dimensional shape nor an edge such as a sphere, which is rather unintuitive.
That aside, as you look further out many light-years away you are seeing things as they where that many years ago. The furthest we can possibly look out in any direction is back to the Big Bang. That's how we know fairly accurately how old the universe is.
but IS it POSSIBLE, that the universe IS older, but we just cant SEE it yet, thats all im asking here, i know that we know what we know, but i believe that there is much that we cant see yet, because it is still light years away from being able to be seen
Well sure, provided we have an inaccurate understanding of our observations.
To clarify: It's certainly within reason to assume that the universe is larger than what we can perceive of it by the same means through which we estimate its age. That being, as we look out into deep space, we are seeing it as it was, but not as it is now. This however does not mean that it is any older.
According to our current understanding the universe does not have an edge nor a center from our point of view.
The thing is, humans have been taught to believe that something had to be created in order to exist. You do have a point though. Perhaps you'll be right.
The big bang is a horrible misnomer, it sounds magical when you say it that way. It should be called the little rift in dimension by unstable vacuum flucuation that allowed dimension to turn itself inside out. Our universe is like the pressure relief of the pre-universe. A crack in the crust of a dimension we can't percieve that never closed until the massive enrgy dissipated. We are in a bubble of expended energy, like carbon fizz in soda pop.
Gases and energy existed for ever creating nebula and more and more atoms and more particles were crashing and creating fusions and when its combine together its exploded creating the Universe and the expansion. The Theory of this is those atoms and Gases coming from another universe, were energy scape or leaks from another dimension and is how our universe was create it, so we are talking about a multiverse, we're just a new born of the other universes. This is the new Scientific theory.
this may seem like a completely dumb question, and im HOPING that someone can answer this, but my problem with the big bang is that as i get it, the big bang created the universe, which means that before the big bang, there was nothing, so if there was nothing, where did the atoms, or electrons, or whatever they were, (volkswagons for all i care) Where did they come from if there was nothing before, maybee i just cant find it possible to comprehend that there was just NOTHING and then SOMETHING
So you think the big band was created when your god said "let there be light.. In the bible god created the earth before that quote, let there be light.. so how could it mean the big bang.. think about it..
einstien was wrong nikola tesla sent industrial energy 2- 100 times faster than light and no time travel happened just instant communication and energy transfer! this was scienficially proven by tesla at colorado springs! i also show the test tesla did to start proving faster than light communication and energy transfer
there is something you are missing i think most of humans in this planet have the potential to be a "genius" its just a social label, i think the education sistem is wrong and doesnt stands for the potencial, society repulces potencial cause they dont understand it they dont search for knowleadge adopting the label "geeks arent cool" even thought their lives are a constant waiste of time, make all kind of questions and then try to solve them it just stands for the dedication, time you put intoit
Antag, that belief is merely communist theory applied to the educational system; and it is precisely the problem . People are not equal. A man standing 170CM has less "potential" to become a basketball star than someone standing 240CM. Just like the vast differences in the skeletal and muscular systems give some advantages in sports, variations in the nervous system (brain) give some advantages in , physics, art, math, salesman, cook, economist, , librarian, trash collector, etc.
i didnt meant to say that we are equal if you read my comment i never wrote that, my point was that most of humans are extremely lazy, they dont want to search anything of course im talking about students, they only rely on what a group of teachers teach and they are not curious about anything else, what i mean is that discovery is made when some dedicated experiment with something that no one has before, so you dont need to have a higher iq that someone else to make advances in something new
Why is it that so many crackpots and nuts got so upset over Darwin's Theory of Biological Macro-Evolution and Human-Caused Global Warming, but there was never any comparatively large outrage against Einstein's Theories of Relativity, even though they are, fundamentally, much more bizarre and contradictory to the status quo?
because the people that put those theories down, especially the so, so obvious theory of evolution, cannot even begin to grasp the the theory of relativity.
explain consciousness is easy. we all born with it. it is ours taste, touch, smell, see, hear, & fell of the world around us. if you're a astronomy you uses touch, see, hear, fell to view your world. thus, making you understand only to what your eyes can see. to the person saying that 99% of the peoples on this planet are useless. well, he's was wrong, it just depends on where we were raises and get the educated.
saying that is being completely ignorant to not only the genius population in the world but also to the scientific and intellectual progress of society. i mean, you can say you're useless, but i know i'm not; i make sure of it. just because you don't have the confidence to think you have the ability to do something important doesn't mean you can lump everyone else in the same category. i suggest you change your attitude and make yourself useful.
to say we're incapable of understanding consciousness is a severe underestimation of human potential. the only thing that could stop a person from discovering such information would be a lack of motivation.
that's like saying you can't understand a brain because it controls your means of operating.
what you then propose is perhaps a different definition of "understanding" than mine. to me, the only information that is "understood" to the most enlightened person on the planet is that of logic in its purest form (mathematics). everything else is just a system developed to make general predictions based on probability and experimental data.
i dont get get it !!! the wmap of big bang is 13.73 billion light years away so that means the point of big bang is 13.73b light years away from our earth and the oldest star in our galaxy is 13.4b light years !!! so the distance of 13.73b light years is covered in 0.33b light years !! am i right ! ? ! ? ! ?
yea i guess you have a point there...ur exactly right..its just that it makes you thinkg to ur self and ask the same question and that is how did Everything in this Universe appear from NOTHING!!...even if we understand that we all may have started from the big bang which started from a singularity....There must be a GOD because how else would such energy be possible from no visible source
No ..u actually make a good point ...its just hard to understand how everything started or how GOD just appeared out of nowhere, and im pretty sure that question will remain unanswered for all of eternity
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
Please! Guys don't belive the nasa they already are time traveling! else why they wanted to fake a travel to the moon and actually be there? On earth we got many star gates that lead to moon mars etc thats no sc fi!
star gates hey? funny u should say that. how many people went through this star gate and took a stroll on the moon and lived to come back talking about it?
@mr suicideman...the question raised in a long way is "does light have a chance of traveling faster than 186k per sec do to the gravitational terminal velocity of being sucked into a black hole?"
tallbillyboy 1 week ago
Hats off to Einstein ..a single man with infinite ideas!
alienkishorekumar 1 week ago
so the otherside becomes a star past the event horizon, and all the matter being sucked in is then compressed and forms at the closest star.. which then unifies all the other principles about how each galaxy remains seperate but linear if each star in universe corrisponds, im sorry but you did try this before and the readings were inconclusive as the probe was crushed and destroyed and the signal was lost, in fact everytime you have done this it's failed, im not crazy we stuck in temporal paradi
tyga42 4 months ago
i believe it was stephen hawking that said what causes a black hole was the implosion of a star or planet......
nicwebana 5 months ago
@nicwebana your stupid
BrockTheRockTv 4 months ago
I have a teory but its not quite perfect due to actual knowladge of me:
well can the light speed change due to deformations of space(ex: blackhole)?
And since the velocity can me measure with v=deltaX/deltaT when the actuall deltaX is bended and the time is change cuz of the gravitational field will it stay with the same speed? or will it increase with a prespective outside of the black hole gravitational field but still remain the same speed(insde the field (due to the space-time changes) ?
MrSuicideMan 6 months ago
Who can help me build the speed of light spacecraft, e-mail me.wmv
The spacecraft can beyond the speed of light.
I tell you the secrets of electricity and magnetism, you help me build the spacecraft.
Seek cooperation the global.
----Xuhui
zxhthinker 6 months ago
alien helped Einstein :)
guess777 7 months ago
Human race could go so much further ....we can acomplish so much....sadly there are lots of retards in this world ...about 80 %.
Molhedim 9 months ago
@Molhedim 80% is an underestimation. More like 99%.
salehjoon 8 months ago 2
Einstein was the greatest scientist world had ever seen! if he couldve lived a little longer he would ve solved the puzzle of grand unification and theory of everything!
ProttoyEinstein 9 months ago
who dislike this kind of documentary lol..... 8 ppl are retarted
blueice8982 9 months ago 3
too bad NASA kicked Lisa to the curb. I was really looking forward to this mission.
Rotorzilla 9 months ago
CHECK OUT "UFO Disclosure, Revelations & the 2012 Connection" ON
YOUTUBE This is a compilation of evidence revealed by former military personnel,
astronauts, politicians, American presidents. This contains credible aired news
UFO footage. The compilation reveals knowledge of life beyond Earth + the
current ongoing presence and initiated contact which has being hidden from the
public for over 50 years + more.
Freedomloveandtruth 9 months ago
It's amazing that Einstein was able to hypothesize about the existence of black holes in that day and age.
900BiscayneBayCondos 10 months ago 10
@900BiscayneBayCondos Please, the Mayans knew about way before Einstein.
prscomp 3 months ago
@prscomp Nope. Mayans did not have tensor calculus.
CostaDelBarto 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I am a sex machine! Do you like to touch my penis?
wasdalie 10 months ago
@wasdalie yes
4inches4u 9 months ago
Nothing.
MegaBEANER1000 10 months ago
@rambo6267 You don't know who is Einstein but I'm sure that you know Paris Hilton because she has much more contribution to the science right?
cyberarmy198 11 months ago
"sorry but? who is einstein
rambo6267 4 months ago"
You are clearly dense, stupified, brainless, ...in short a cipher on the map of the human mind!
junkyardpolester 11 months ago
@rambo6267
"sorry but? who is einstein
rambo6267 4 months ago"
Dense, stupified, brainless, ...in short a cipher on the map of the human mind!
junkyardpolester 11 months ago
Black holes are elements with incredible mass! Their mass is so great that light cannot escape them....hence thet CANNOT be seen!
junkyardpolester 11 months ago
"@dunkhead...gavity is caused by elementary charges of the four stable particles electron (e), positron (p), proton (P) and elton (E = "antiproton").
This is total bullshite. Gravity is NOT created by any elementary particle! Gravity is the attraction between two elements that have MASS! If two rocks could be thrown into space very, very close to each other...they would soon attract one another because of their miniscule gravitational attraction for each other.
junkyardpolester 11 months ago
Black holes are everywhere? Oh gosh, no!
bipinformprotect 11 months ago
at 5:36 WTF ? "And detect particles of time left over from the beginning of the Universe"... what ???? is this English? Particles of time? We detect them ?? Never heard of such things...
supremeon1 11 months ago
@supremeon1 NEWSFLASH!!! There are probably a few more things you haven't heard of before....
69drummerdude 11 months ago
@69drummerdude You are saying that the time is split into particles? like matter? and that they can be detected? you're making me laugh...
supremeon1 11 months ago
@supremeon1 You've heard how light from distant stars takes years to travel to earth? Scientist pick up that light, analyse its spectrum that tells things about the matter (star/planet) that this light came from. But since we assume that travel through space won't change the light it tells us about the time when it started its journey. Different stars at different distances from earth take different time to travel and so tell about different times. Particles of time that tell about matter ...
69drummerdude 11 months ago
@supremeon1 whe he says particle of time left over. he means evidence of the big bang still flying around the universe.
molyvenson 11 months ago
Once we conceive theory of everything, we would be able to explain ourselves very accurately!
ProttoyEinstein 1 year ago
Gravity wave = spacetime stretch/ compress . How do you stretch spacetime ?
Mass and velocity cause ripples in spacetime .
My body mass cause a spacetime shift which allows me to exist in this frame .
Space is a form of matter , and therefore has mass .
As I travel through space , I displace the mass of space causing ripples in space time.
Huge objects displace so much spacetime that their effects can be measured
This shows as gravitational lensing .
peterm3964 1 year ago
@peterm3964 Its because of a time rate of change of the gravitational field of a energy - momentum distribution. If the space - time metric describing the gravitational field changes with time then it produces gravitational waves a lot like electromagnetic waves.
floopsie666 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
friend this is simple as that of cyclone but cyclone form because of differential of pressure and black hole are because of gravity. now dont waste time and get together for betterment of life present on earth
MrDipu321 1 year ago
friend this is simple as that of cyclone but cyclone form because of differential of pressure and black hole are because of gravity. now dont waste time and get together for batterment of life present on earth
MrDipu321 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REAL Free energy technology exists!But the Oil companies want these technologies unknown to the masses,Find a motor that needs no fuel or input at LT-MAGNET-MOTORdotCOM ,Start the revolution!
jjerkings2890 1 year ago
its simple the answer Einstein think how to shorten the space that travel through time by using speed of light, that no necessary longer than the light years far from apart like planets that turns back time light speed is faster than the sound and bullet, in the solar system you can see star but its light because it so far like billions of year but if you using the light speed you can travel in shorter time that is Einstein thinking how to build that thing!
melvaMylove 1 year ago
Its as if the black hole is a rip in space time, and on the other side is a higher wavelength of energy
EnlightenMe0000 1 year ago
@NASAexplorer i got a questions for you.
how can you search for something like black holes when you can´t reach it?. why don´t you explore how to make a item then or anything nearby the earth? and why MOST you search a life out of the planet earth? if we can find life then i most be out of our solar system. And.... you know that evrey planet we visit and make life there will be destoryed of CO2 and such.
pisoff44 1 year ago
there not explaining anything, they just keep on asking questions
glennmc300 1 year ago
what they are saying is out of this world
glennmc300 1 year ago
i thought they stll werent sure about the shape of the universe
Westige30 1 year ago
It would have been fantastic if Tesla & Einstien had got together & shared their opinions
davyro66 1 year ago 23
@davyro66 those two, and Frank Zappa! :)
panhead1219 1 year ago
@panhead1219 you've trumped me there that would be some mix up that would ;)
davyro66 1 year ago
@davyro66 i dont think einstein wld be in the band tesla. it wld sound very werid. heavy metal songs about math eh dont think so.....lol.....i know ur tlkn bout the guy tesla got their name from
metal220 1 year ago
@davyro66 didnt they do the manhattan project together?
johnedwardthomas 8 months ago
@johnedwardthomas No they didn't like each other at all,Tesla used to always question Einstein's theory of relativity.Tesla always maintained that Einstein had got his equations wrong,obviously Einstein didn't like this so they used to have big public disagreements.One thing that was for sure though was Tesla understood the Earth's electro-gravity fields better than anyone & Einstein knew his physics better than anyone,work it out if you can i know its confusing.
davyro66 8 months ago
@davyro66 i would disagree with that. perhaps it would be someone else turn to discover this things, and it would be great.
MichaelMellijor 6 months ago
@davyro66 I don't think it would have mattered much. Tesla's ideas was inclined to electricity. Einstein was to force and physics.
hitokiri657 6 months ago
@hitokiri657 Is the study of electricity not physics?
davyro66 6 months ago
@davyro66 It is, but to make discoveries you need to internalize your area of specialization and be in years of researching. "Sharing opinions" ,as they guy who i replied stated, was not going to exchange years and years of scrutinizing in their individual areas.
But don't worry, as math has showed us, nothing is 100% certain, so who knows what might happened. But then again, Einstein was exposed to plenty of brilliant scientists.
hitokiri657 6 months ago
@hitokiri657
...and einstein rose above them ALL
atlzfinest4life 5 months ago
@davyro66 Electricity IS a study in physics lol
gvsfgdf 4 months ago
@gvsfgdf i don't think you've read my comment properly if you had done you wouldn't have wrote your comment lolollol
davyro66 4 months ago
@davyro66 oh read it now LOL my bad
gvsfgdf 4 months ago
Math has predicted a lot of what is reality.
twodoortwo 1 year ago 2
“Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation, and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality.”-tesla-
luwiz 1 year ago
universe is made of atoms, atoms DO exist, however 99% off atoms is invisbile but we manage to see them, maybe your right.
ultimatesonic88 1 year ago
Great!!!
talatdhk 1 year ago
The big bang = Star that collapsed with a black hole.
That is all.
AbigailMoller 1 year ago
@AbigailMoller bullshit
leparditas 1 year ago
@leparditas Haha, I was just kidding :>
AbigailMoller 1 year ago
Comment removed
pnwgeographer 1 year ago
The REAL answer to ALL these questions lie in something I do not see being studied scientifically. Awareness! what is awareness , that is who we really are and everything that "exists" or doesn't really exist is a product of this unknown quantity.
jagg1951 1 year ago
@jagg1951 exactly - suptle form of energy the ether They forgot to include the observer into their equations and only saw the observed. matter and energy occupy the same space and time is an illusion that things are not happing all at once. it is motion that gives us a sense of change movement through time but if time move at the speed of light it slow down. their is an inner space and an outer space and they are only looking at the outer space -left the observer out of their equations
Thundralight 1 year ago
Moving Dimensions Hypothesis
rbolo29 1 year ago
tesla said> einstein is a fool
StariSloven 1 year ago
again fools for not puting spirtual sense into thought because you will never figure it all out without god because really i believe dark matter is thought of god and all life. Some things just cant be proven and thats what jesus was saying about faith
TylerThrashPeace 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
again fools for not puting spirtual sense into thought because you will never figure it all out without god because really i believe dark matter is thought of god and all life. Some things just cant be proven and thats what jesus was saying about faith
TylerThrashPeace 1 year ago
again fools for not puting spirtual sense into thought because you will never figure it all out without god because really i believe dark matter is thought of god and all life. and if you see it how will you know what its doing
TylerThrashPeace 1 year ago
@TylerThrashPeace . All literature on this subject is futile and destined to oblivion. So are all attempts to explain the workings of the universe without recognizing the existence of the ether and the indispensable function it plays in the phenomena." I consider myself the original discoverer of this truth, which can be expressed by the statement: There is no energy in matter other than that received from the environment." — Nikola Tesla
Thundralight 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Einstein believed in God
thegoddescomposer 1 year ago
its all theory!! none of its proven and scientist keep changing their minds, so Eienstien was another bullshiter, plus he sed te universe WASN'T, yes he said it wasn't expanding, so there you go!
colemanmills 1 year ago
if things were going faster than the speed of light than they would just be missing the light that would have hit it and be invisible because the light would not reflect back to our eye. if you were in a car floating through space at the speed of light than what would happen if you turned on your headlights?
guitardude517 1 year ago
Everything is energy, connected to the Highest consciousness..Christians call God. God is energy=light and sound. This energy descends through dimensions, down to the 3rd some are still dwelling within. What is perceived as material is actually light and sound vibrating at incredible rates in order to ascend or vibrate lower-descend into dense matter. Consciousness, thoughts are energy in which expands the universe. This creates more universe. Energy continues to expand, therefore, so do we.
Alearia3 1 year ago
@Alearia3
That religion....
You cannot add religion in universe.. Cause there isn't any proves that god really exists or existed...
perker180 1 year ago
@Alearia3 "Everything is energy" is not true: The masses of electron (e) and proton (P), m(e) and m(P), can not be identified with, and can not be converted in energy! Black holes do not exists, the gravity is caused by elemenary (and invariant) gravitational charges
g(k) = {- g m(e), + g m(e), + g m(P), - g m(P)}
of the electron (e), positron (p), proton (P) and the elton (E). If the electromagnetic interaction is attractive between particles, the gravity is repusive.
gyulaszasz 1 year ago
@gyulaszasz The universal gravitational constant is
G(grav.) = g^2/4pi.
gyulaszasz 1 year ago
@gyulaszasz what is gravity? genuinly curious n no one seems to be able to answer it in a way that fullfills my mind frankly i dnt ge the maths, but the pure physics blows my mind n i luv it p.s. on my way to a physics degree so would luv an explination
dunkknud 1 year ago
@dunkknud The gavity is caused by elementary charges
g(k) = {-g m(e), + g m(e), + g m(P), - g m(P)}, k = e,p,P,E
of the four stable particles electron (e), positron (p), proton (P) and elton (E = "antiproton").
The static gravitational force between these elementary particles is
F(grav.) = - g(j) g(k)/4pir^2.
gyulaszasz 1 year ago
"Do not the unbelievers see that the heavens and the earth were a closed-up mass (ratqan), then We clove them asunder (fataqna)? And We made from water every living thing. Will they not then believe?" Al-Qur'an 21:31
86redemption 1 year ago
I think there is no such thing as dark energy,
I believe that there are other universes orbiting around each other giving the current view on the vastness of space a extra push to infinity. Maybe that is an explanation why deep space objects are moving away from our cosmic center of origin at speeds faster then ligt. + that gamma ray instruments indicated signals of light that are far beyond the current known edge of 14billion light years far beyond our universe based on our current observations
Armigo91 1 year ago
what are you basing your ideas on?
What's moving at faster than the speed of light?
Galactu5 1 year ago
Mate i fully understand what you mean.
However its hard for me accept that the universe started from a single point. How did that point appear? Into what is space expanding? If the universe is growing that means its not infinite, hence there has to be something beyond it.
The big bang and expansion theories rise more questions than they solve.
Yes the expansion has been measured, however since we dont know the dimensions of the universe the expansion could be just as "local" phenomena.
Buuub08 1 year ago
nobody claims to know what happened before the big bang, or how it happened. he simply infer from our observations, like any intelligent person would. we see all galaxies in the sky moving away from one another, so if time is reversed, they will all be moving towards one another. turn back time enough, and logically the universe may have formed a singularity. this observation coupled with our knowledge of gravity, quantum physics, and the CMBR, allow us to infer that something like a big bang
joh04667 1 year ago
The thing is that no one knows why the galaxies move and for how long. Maybe in a couple trillion years they will move closer and then further again.
As you will notice no object in space has a constant distance to another. Thus, as i said, it could be just a local phenomena.
The Big Bang is just an assumption to have a starting point.
A Big Bang might have happened indeed, but that doesnt mean it created the universe as its presented. This, for the universe, could also be just a local event.
Buuub08 1 year ago
time and space are human made terminologies, they dont exist.
I highly doubt space has a size or an age. If it has an age, what was before that? Where did the big bang come from? God's fart? Bullshit. All those theories arise from the simple human need to have a start point.
Even the expanding space theory.. what is it expanding into?
By me its just a local (for the space measure) event. As we see objects move away from each other here, somewhere else the opposite might happen. We dont know.
Buuub08 1 year ago
Actually, the idea of big bang comes from observation, rather than a need for a starting point (which I seem to be lacking--am I special?). Before big bang? Dunno, maybe another universe(s), we don't know--we weren't there, we have no way of knowing. I'll not waste space explaining why we have no way of knowing (at present). No offense, but from what little you said in your comment, you seem to be grossly ignorant when it comes to big bang and the expansion of space.
Authilus 1 year ago
Yep i dont agree with the big bang theory and age of universe bullshit.
Why? Well, you said it yourself - we dont know anything about the universe. And the "observations" are very local (in the universe scale) and we dont even know the basic structure of it so how can we say its doing this'n'that? The human mind simply cant accept something existing forever and being infinite, thats why these theories emerge.
Buuub08 1 year ago
I refer you to my previous statement regarding your apparent gross ignorance in this matter. Knowing the structure of the universe (which, by the way, we are making strong headway in understanding) is no more a requirement for making statements about the universe that are true than it was for doctors to make statements about the human body before they began to understand DNA-or the subatomic particles that make the body. We often understand how before we understand why.
Authilus 1 year ago
I havent been able to find anything we "know" about the universe that hasnt been based on theories and hypothesis'. Thus its all assumed not proven/known for fact.
Our understanding of the universe is basically 0. We think a lot but we know nothing.
Buuub08 1 year ago
The hypothesis and theories they give birth to are quite a bit more than anything upon which I see your statements standing. As I mentioned, we often understand the how before they why. Every test against the idea that can be applied to disprove big bang has been applied, with all failing. We observe: universe appears to be growing!\, hypothesis: if it is growing, it had a point at which growth began, theorize: big bang.
Authilus 1 year ago
Long before we had the tools, when the very technology to test such things hadn't even been a possibility, we were able to use what we know to make predictions about what we would find in our universe (if we had the means to look) if big bang was a realistic model--and as the decades have gone by and technologies advanced, time and time again we have found those very things we predicted we would find.
Authilus 1 year ago
Getting to the nuts and bolts of your statement, that you haven't found anything that we "know" that isn't based on a theory (I omit hypothesis, as it is superfluous, once a theory has been developed--you would know this, if you were scientifically literate). A theory comes as a result of something we know, and then can be used to surprise us by predicting things we don't know--many of those unknowns have been validated (black hole, as an example).
Authilus 1 year ago
Continuing on my "nuts and bolts" comment, use the real world situation of Newton. Newton noticed that things fall. He KNOWS things fall through observation. His observations inspire him to hypothesize, and eventually develop a theory.
Now, think about E=mc². Just a theory, but we were able to predict that Earth's gravity would affect they way we experience the flow of time--through a weak little theory. Mighty big prediction--we tested it, and holy crow, it was true! Now we KNOW it.
Authilus 1 year ago
And so I am left once again referring you to my observation that you are grossly ignorant in this subject; consequently, it renders you incapable of holding a meaningful conversation on the topic. Learn what the word theory means in science, discard what it means out on the street, and try to accept that scientific theory always has and always will be of greater benefit than using wishful thinking and ill-informed fancies of the type that you seem to embrace.
Authilus 1 year ago
Isnt it obvious for everyone that there is no such thing as time. Its a fact. Time is only an illusion. Its just everything that change. Time is just a tool. We all agree here or?
pigadia1 1 year ago
@pigadia1 nonsense!
lennhart 1 year ago
@FireProoof101
I think.. a black hole is a "hole" or tear in our universe "Balloon" That when someone or thing goes threw.. they'll just be outside the universe Balloon. lol.. i cant be wrong cuz its what I think.. wawawawa
Showoffjg 2 years ago
its not a hole at all ..
its a ball of matter that curves the space time fabric around it .
sidewaysfcs0718 2 years ago
95% unknown.
You are science. Forensics; 5% proven, fact.
Astronomers are PHOTOGRAPHERS.
They know Aperture, meassurement of angle and light. know horizon of visible objects, AND FUCK ALL ELSE.
FUCK YOU ALL UNIVERSITY DEGREES.
msam1970 2 years ago
Well what is it growing in? What does it look like at the end of the baloon.
Hermoor 2 years ago
There can't have been a big bang or something outside our universe. If now the universe is everything that exists. The universe can't expand if it's everything. It has no end and no beginning meaning it can't expand. There is no reason to think about these questions. First we must figure our our own planet...then we take the moon mars...and the rest of the planets. Then the sun, then we can start thinking about these questions..
Hermoor 2 years ago
@Hermoor
Think of the universe as a balloon. It doesn't have a beginning, nor an end, and no matter how much you go around on its surface, you will never reach the "end". If you inflate the balloon, it's surface will expand - the same as the universe. It may not have a beginning nor an end, but it can grow bigger.
Neso906 2 years ago
ok, say the universe is the balloon. In side the balloon it has no end nor beginning so it's everywhere and also a vacuum/perfect space. Vaccuum is defined as a volume of space that's empty and has no weight, so energy = 0. If there's no energy in the perfect space/ vaccuum with no living thing in it, how did you get energy to create the big bang. Could there be something else create somehow an energy for outside the universe that cause the big bang?
k3nuot 1 year ago
**Could there be something else create somehow an energy come from outside the universe that cause the big bang? If you say yes then the universe is not everywhere, it also has a beginning and an end. This is not a statement this is a question.
k3nuot 1 year ago
Assuming the universe being spherical instantly means that its not infinite.
You can infinitely walk around the Earth, it will never end, however it doesnt has infinite volume.
Thus giving space any shape, size or starting point automatically means that something was before and is beyond what we call "space" or "universe". Thus its not infinite and is contained within something else.
And where did all the matter for the bang come from? From:
A) God
B) It always there
or
A) Big Bang BS
B) Logic.
Buuub08 1 year ago
This is untrue. Energy is in everything, every where, at every time. Energy is merely infinitely condensed "matter". If a vacuum truly made space empty, then we wouldn't be able to perceive it, therefore it would never exist. Just like time past the "Event Horizon" of a blackhole, we can not perceive it, therefore, it is non-existent.
Airsoftsniperkid 1 year ago
@Neso906: It has a certain limit...........If the expansion crosses that limit then it will burst out... so if u relate the universe as a balloon then we can say that the universe will burst too. Lets say the name of the event is "BIG BOOM".. The universe does have an end.. Because it has a beginning "BIG BANG"... Everything has a beginning & an end (also the UNIVERSE)
ananta2777 1 year ago
the more i think about it, and believe me that's an effort, you would be able to hear the cogs ticking away, but there is a huge lean toward me believing that the universe is a manifestation of the collective conscience of the living beings, as in we created ourselves, its kinda whacked out i know, but not at all impossible, we exist, because we exist, we control more of out physical existence than we think we do
V8VRUte 2 years ago
awesomely said..that is a really good theory or belief you have..i kind of co-inside with you on that one..the universe is here because we are here..The act of us looking and believing we create our reality.Very well said.
Namaste
boomerskr3w 2 years ago
looks like someone knows the law of attraction XD
kirox777 1 year ago
and plus more haha what subjects do you mostly like to discuss?
Namaste
boomerskr3w 1 year ago
Fat chance. Today's young people are brought up with just about as much sensitivity to a modern view of science as the Hitler-Jugend with a sensitivity to moral and ethical issues. Remember that Einstein was rejected by the educational system of his time. But he was not completely broken, so he could persevere. The Einstein of today might likely be a poor devil rotting up in Guantanamo or one of its clones.
tommyrjensen 2 years ago
Existance, time and space never had a beginning. You can learn to accept that, and even grow into understanding it, but helas the human mind can not grasp the absence of limits to time and space.
Maybe in a few more generations?
LiteWaiter 2 years ago
@LiteWaiter I'm glad to see that i'm not the only one that doesn't think that everything came from nothing. If you believe there was a start to the universe then you HAVE to believe there will be an end to the universe or your theory means absolutely nothing. The big bang is a linear theory which, unless you believe in a higher form of being is just not possible. For someone to even suggest that everything that is came to be in one random event is just absurd.
golfinskaman 2 years ago
How matter disrupts from time, and still has an observable dynamic within perceived by a conciousness out of our current universe, is difficult to imagine, and currently inexplicable. Not only because our abstract maths are defining unimaginable reality and not only therefore has a distortion. 1, 0, infinite, minus are a few. minus times plus is minus. An agreement that comes out of a creature that dfines problem the cause, solution the effect. Fighting gravity, dusk till dawn.
Joke9972 2 years ago
classic example of pulling numbers out of your ass
michaeldrewdanner 2 years ago
my own perception, is that we JUST ARE. Why did something have to have created the universe, why cant it JUST exist, it is what it is, we cant change it, we cant control it, so just buckle up and hang on for the ride lol, as as for what we do know, that there SEEMS to be an edge to the universe, but is it possible that it just goes on even further, but we just cant see it yet, which would suggest the universe is much older than we think it is
V8VRUte 2 years ago
It's accounted for.
The universe is most likely finite, but does not have a convention three dimensional shape nor an edge such as a sphere, which is rather unintuitive.
That aside, as you look further out many light-years away you are seeing things as they where that many years ago. The furthest we can possibly look out in any direction is back to the Big Bang. That's how we know fairly accurately how old the universe is.
TruthIsUniversal 2 years ago
but IS it POSSIBLE, that the universe IS older, but we just cant SEE it yet, thats all im asking here, i know that we know what we know, but i believe that there is much that we cant see yet, because it is still light years away from being able to be seen
V8VRUte 2 years ago
Well sure, provided we have an inaccurate understanding of our observations.
To clarify: It's certainly within reason to assume that the universe is larger than what we can perceive of it by the same means through which we estimate its age. That being, as we look out into deep space, we are seeing it as it was, but not as it is now. This however does not mean that it is any older.
According to our current understanding the universe does not have an edge nor a center from our point of view.
TruthIsUniversal 2 years ago
That being said, we can see aspects of a spherical edge of sorts as we look out and back in time to the beginning of the known universe.
TruthIsUniversal 2 years ago
The thing is, humans have been taught to believe that something had to be created in order to exist. You do have a point though. Perhaps you'll be right.
deathborne25 2 years ago
The big bang is a horrible misnomer, it sounds magical when you say it that way. It should be called the little rift in dimension by unstable vacuum flucuation that allowed dimension to turn itself inside out. Our universe is like the pressure relief of the pre-universe. A crack in the crust of a dimension we can't percieve that never closed until the massive enrgy dissipated. We are in a bubble of expended energy, like carbon fizz in soda pop.
stevenweir76 2 years ago 2
Gases and energy existed for ever creating nebula and more and more atoms and more particles were crashing and creating fusions and when its combine together its exploded creating the Universe and the expansion. The Theory of this is those atoms and Gases coming from another universe, were energy scape or leaks from another dimension and is how our universe was create it, so we are talking about a multiverse, we're just a new born of the other universes. This is the new Scientific theory.
agubaia 2 years ago
this may seem like a completely dumb question, and im HOPING that someone can answer this, but my problem with the big bang is that as i get it, the big bang created the universe, which means that before the big bang, there was nothing, so if there was nothing, where did the atoms, or electrons, or whatever they were, (volkswagons for all i care) Where did they come from if there was nothing before, maybee i just cant find it possible to comprehend that there was just NOTHING and then SOMETHING
V8VRUte 2 years ago 2
hehe thats what every1 is tryin to figure it out
TheZeroBeats 2 years ago
One word: M-Theory. It will be hard for you to grasp the concept at first.
TheXeroSkill 2 years ago
Well there was a single point called a singularity.
If you take that point and throw it inside the 10 dimensions model then it could be anything really.
From a single mathematical point to an entire universe on its own.
Which makes the big bang theory plausible.
BaggsR 2 years ago
Comment removed
teenageturtleboy 2 years ago
So you think the big band was created when your god said "let there be light.. In the bible god created the earth before that quote, let there be light.. so how could it mean the big bang.. think about it..
iLimitlessi 2 years ago
good point but the bible taken litterally is a little bit strange to begin with
deewana16 2 years ago 10
@deewana16 the bible tells all u need to know
metal220 1 year ago
you won't find a flaw in general relativity, it's simply too beautiful to be wrong
weweallthewayhome 2 years ago
If space is expanding, there must be a point of origin where matter is being dispursed.
G3ZAAHS 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
i am the son of einstein
oglox27 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
einstien was wrong nikola tesla sent industrial energy 2- 100 times faster than light and no time travel happened just instant communication and energy transfer! this was scienficially proven by tesla at colorado springs! i also show the test tesla did to start proving faster than light communication and energy transfer
boxa888 2 years ago
mind=blown
WESMOKEFATBLUNTS 2 years ago
I actually buy the multi dimensional universe.
its either that or everything physical is fake. Maybe the universe is not physical and only minds exist.
virgozero 2 years ago 11
@virgozero thats why i believe omfg..
cCaglarOne 1 year ago
there is something you are missing i think most of humans in this planet have the potential to be a "genius" its just a social label, i think the education sistem is wrong and doesnt stands for the potencial, society repulces potencial cause they dont understand it they dont search for knowleadge adopting the label "geeks arent cool" even thought their lives are a constant waiste of time, make all kind of questions and then try to solve them it just stands for the dedication, time you put intoit
Antag5 2 years ago
"i think the education SISTEM...
almost sir, almost..
WESMOKEFATBLUNTS 2 years ago
sorry english is not my native language
Antag5 2 years ago
Antag, that belief is merely communist theory applied to the educational system; and it is precisely the problem . People are not equal. A man standing 170CM has less "potential" to become a basketball star than someone standing 240CM. Just like the vast differences in the skeletal and muscular systems give some advantages in sports, variations in the nervous system (brain) give some advantages in , physics, art, math, salesman, cook, economist, , librarian, trash collector, etc.
ManicTrader 2 years ago
i didnt meant to say that we are equal if you read my comment i never wrote that, my point was that most of humans are extremely lazy, they dont want to search anything of course im talking about students, they only rely on what a group of teachers teach and they are not curious about anything else, what i mean is that discovery is made when some dedicated experiment with something that no one has before, so you dont need to have a higher iq that someone else to make advances in something new
Antag5 2 years ago
Why is it that so many crackpots and nuts got so upset over Darwin's Theory of Biological Macro-Evolution and Human-Caused Global Warming, but there was never any comparatively large outrage against Einstein's Theories of Relativity, even though they are, fundamentally, much more bizarre and contradictory to the status quo?
j97hou6 2 years ago
because the people that put those theories down, especially the so, so obvious theory of evolution, cannot even begin to grasp the the theory of relativity.
t2491tom 2 years ago
explain consciousness is easy. we all born with it. it is ours taste, touch, smell, see, hear, & fell of the world around us. if you're a astronomy you uses touch, see, hear, fell to view your world. thus, making you understand only to what your eyes can see. to the person saying that 99% of the peoples on this planet are useless. well, he's was wrong, it just depends on where we were raises and get the educated.
Linkwii64 2 years ago
Comment removed
socomcygnusx1 2 years ago
Atheists seem to get along OK without religion.
mrblack888 2 years ago 2
Yeah, I'm fine.
IFloridaMotocrossI 2 years ago 3
You bet
Antag5 2 years ago
saying that is being completely ignorant to not only the genius population in the world but also to the scientific and intellectual progress of society. i mean, you can say you're useless, but i know i'm not; i make sure of it. just because you don't have the confidence to think you have the ability to do something important doesn't mean you can lump everyone else in the same category. i suggest you change your attitude and make yourself useful.
pstlwhppd 2 years ago
to say we're incapable of understanding consciousness is a severe underestimation of human potential. the only thing that could stop a person from discovering such information would be a lack of motivation.
pstlwhppd 2 years ago
that's like saying you can't understand a brain because it controls your means of operating.
what you then propose is perhaps a different definition of "understanding" than mine. to me, the only information that is "understood" to the most enlightened person on the planet is that of logic in its purest form (mathematics). everything else is just a system developed to make general predictions based on probability and experimental data.
pstlwhppd 2 years ago
Yeah, and when we know that the spacetime are part of something more fundamental, we will ask what is beneath that too.
Or someone will come around and give us another new view of the same thing, but that accommodates the rest of it.
Never stop searching for answers.
soccom8341576 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Hear no Evil See no Evil Feel no Evil.....
The truth will set you free.... =D
PaulWayneBarnett 2 years ago
i dont get get it !!! the wmap of big bang is 13.73 billion light years away so that means the point of big bang is 13.73b light years away from our earth and the oldest star in our galaxy is 13.4b light years !!! so the distance of 13.73b light years is covered in 0.33b light years !! am i right ! ? ! ? ! ?
muxammle 2 years ago
SCIENCE contradicts GOD and thats a known fact....theres no way they can go hand and hand without contradictions
flashydee123 2 years ago
science contradicts god in a biblical sense. i would say the ideologies of modern science coincide more with agnosticism.
pstlwhppd 2 years ago
ur exactly right though ...i guess we'll eventually find out
flashydee123 2 years ago
yea i guess you have a point there...ur exactly right..its just that it makes you thinkg to ur self and ask the same question and that is how did Everything in this Universe appear from NOTHING!!...even if we understand that we all may have started from the big bang which started from a singularity....There must be a GOD because how else would such energy be possible from no visible source
flashydee123 2 years ago
but.. how did god started, how was he.. just there.
Something impossible. There is NOway that.. umm, nvm
RunescapeJcpenny 2 years ago
No ..u actually make a good point ...its just hard to understand how everything started or how GOD just appeared out of nowhere, and im pretty sure that question will remain unanswered for all of eternity
flashydee123 2 years ago
until we can explain consciousness will such questions be answerable.
pstlwhppd 2 years ago
Yes God Exist
Mopsmops 2 years ago
I'm going to test something.
God Exists
cartoonboy1431 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
Please! Guys don't belive the nasa they already are time traveling! else why they wanted to fake a travel to the moon and actually be there? On earth we got many star gates that lead to moon mars etc thats no sc fi!
Mopsmops 2 years ago
well that would be cool, wouldnt it?
SirAMedd 2 years ago
star gates hey? funny u should say that. how many people went through this star gate and took a stroll on the moon and lived to come back talking about it?
lejink 2 years ago
"bubble" images of multiple galaxies at the end of this. who imaged them??
litenet2012 2 years ago