by the sounds of all these fans on all boxing videos saying that boxers should fight top contenders i think boxing will be back to its old ways when we are adults
Hearns guard is terrible, should hav covered up better after throwing punches. He could hav clenched a little also. His footwork is not there either, this fight was a lesson 2 him, he was a terrible bully 4 most of his career. The result of this fight was astonishing, it must hav shook Hearns 2 his core.
@carmodifire Most of his fights really didn't call 4 any type of clinching i kno. Even when U hav very powerful punching ability 1 still has 2 B weary of the other guy.
@The24KaratBlack But hearns was also underweight by 2 lbs in this fight, he overtrained. I think he would have won otherwise. He seemed to have bad luck in big fights (broken hand). But, his average chin was an equalizer; if he had a good chin, I don't think he would lose to leonard and Hagler
@carmodifire If only, Hearns would hav stuck 2 the stick & move he was doing 2 survive, a little longer he would hav frustrated Leonard & forced him 2 get reckless, then he could hav got thru wit a deadly straight. He was getting results with the Boxing, good strikers always try 2 rush the knockout.
@carmodifire 2 lbs!!...is that what your excuse is lol that is so lame i know boxers that can knock out 50 lbs bigger then them and win 2lbs is peanuts!
@TheDrifta23 I wasn't talking about the 2 lbs helping punching power, but chin and endurance. It was a very close fight, and Hearns could have been strengthened by the weight. He cut too much weight, and may have pulled through otherwise. Leonard took a punch, the weight would not have affected the punch by a lot.
@carmodifire true TH could of been strengthened by a little bit more weight but he still had K.O power and a chin it was just his endurance it was no way a match for SRL and that was with most boxers SRL had endurance then most of them!
@TheDrifta23 True, SRL had way more endurance. The question is, would Hearns have been able to pull through the last 2 rounds? I don't know. The 12 round era would have helped Hearns' legacy so much more. (Walcott would have decisioned Marciano too)
To beat Pacquiao you need to be a good "pure boxer," be willing to use some lateral movement and have a good JAB, and both of these guys proved that they have that in this fight alone. Pac is an awesome slugger, i dont think anyone in his weight division can beat him in a toe to toe battle but he shows little boxing skills. Cotto was most effective against Pac when he created space and boxed him and it was the same with the other guys he fought. Mosley trainer knw, dats why mos tryd to box only
if only they could get rid of all the belts and jst leave 1 for every division that way the champ can really go on to prove himself and fight the mandatory challngers cos these days theres too much politics
Talk about role reversal Leonard is the one trying to drop bombs and Hearns is turning the tide back in his favor COME ON RAY!...this is turning into a true classic...
Freddie Roach wouldn't put Manny in the ring with Hearns. I think those guys would lol at manny before laying him out. Dont get me wrong Manny could be one of the best, but not in those days.If you think Manny would beat these guys then he can beat Bernard hopkins too rite?
Freddie Roach wouldn't put Manny in the ring with Hearns. I think those guys would lol at manny before laying him out. Dont get me wrong Manny could be one of the best but, not in those days.If you think Manny would beat these guys then he can beat Bernard hopkins too rite?
Freddie Roach wouldn't put Manny in the ring with Hearns. I think those guys would lol at manny before laying him out. Dont get me wrong Manny could be one of the best but, not in those days.
Boxers suck now a days omg. When you think about it, there is no talent like this today in the welterweights other than Floyd. Manny is good, but he has no chance against these guys. I have Floyd standing a chance, but I'm not sure.
This is the difference between Pac and Hearns; Hearns was an elite BOXER who knew when to switch from boxer to brawler when he needed to. Also, he had that hard rt. hand punch. PAC is only a brawler he cannot stop and box when he needs to. Look at the 2 Marquez fights and the Morales fights....
@svp2010 dude pacquaio now is a whole different figher . pacquiao is not in his prime yet....i think . hes still peaking.... hearns has one bg right hand and reach but his flat footed and his chin is not the best... pac would be too fast. legs hand..for hearns
@smackdownbb4 hearns could box on the move manny steward just showed how to use his physical gifts better if only harrission was trained by steward he knows how to train tall fighters lewis wladimr , hearns if he is able to etablish his jasb on pac curtains is marga can find pac who weighed 144 wat wuld a hearns who weigh 145-147 possessed much more skill speed and ko power do
@smackdownbb4 no way man, ima fan of manny pacquiao but no way he beats tommy hearns, the jab alone would do damage, manny pacquiao is one of the greatest ever but tommy hearns is too and in a welterweight fight hearns would ko manny
@chifuli1974 pacquiao can relate to those guys and he will trade with them and even knock them out cold..i dnt see floyd being able to handle the type power of those guys back he can box their ears off but yes he wudve avoided them lol
@Ronz93 Pacquiao has NEVER fought a guy of that caliber, much less at welter, beating Cotto is not beating Leonard, beating Marquez is not beating Duran and beating Margarito is not beating Leonard. He would have NO CHANCE against any of those guys in their prime cause Pacquiao doesn't fight guys in their prime. He has fought all those guys after their best years and even so he lost to Morales and IMO vs Marquez the 2nd time. So spare me of the Pac argument...
@chifuli1974 Spare me of the pac argument. Beating cotto is much more than fghting leonard. Leonard lost to durant, durant isn't the same caliber like manny, if leonard can b hearns, manny can be him easily. People who saw n were close to all fighters, say manny is th best of all time. So you spare me the arguement hater.
at 147 against Hearns ,Pac-Man would have an 11 inch reach disadvantage and a 6 inch height disadvantage, to be honest he doesnt have the skill to overcome that
boxing was way better then. today all you have are these little mexican midgets fighting each other. I don't wanna see Vazquez v Vazques or whatever, the only people who like that are other Mexicans. I'll stick to these old fights from great fighters of the past!!!
@gonzomoya420 lol funny guy..vasquez v vasquez lol..yeh true those were the days man,can u beleive these guys uses to slug for 15 rounds,jeeez and we call floyd n pac p4p greats,no disrespect to pac n floyd but those guys make them look cheap especially floyd cos he ducks and cant slug,he's afraid to goe to to toe,pac can relate to those guys cos of his aggression and toe to toe style and not to mention his firepower..floyd cant back them off with his power
it should be manditory to fight top contenders.. boxers shouldnt be able to pick and choose fights.. thats the sucky part.. these new era fighters are suckers.. word to the mutha!
@kojicash on the whole i agree however it depends on the trainer, sometimes you'll get a really good trainer who knows what kinda punishment you can take and what you could possibly win however sometimes you'll get a trainer who only wants to make money and will just throw, for example an amateur in with really experienced boxers
80S WAS THE BEST YEARS
ffztu9865 6 days ago
REAL BOXING AND FIGHTS
ffztu9865 6 days ago
by the sounds of all these fans on all boxing videos saying that boxers should fight top contenders i think boxing will be back to its old ways when we are adults
banofee999 1 month ago
It was like Leanord said Fucc dese two rounds.
jontray87 2 months ago
Leonard got robbed on dat scorecard, he shoulda had round7 10-8
jontray87 2 months ago
@jontray87 SRL didn't knock him out though lol so thats why it was given 10-9 to SRL!
TheDrifta23 4 weeks ago
This is a classic SRL digging the LH to the body. BS about weight Hearns had KO power but SRL had a good chin under estimated by a lot of fans
tellthetruthg 2 months ago
Hearns guard is terrible, should hav covered up better after throwing punches. He could hav clenched a little also. His footwork is not there either, this fight was a lesson 2 him, he was a terrible bully 4 most of his career. The result of this fight was astonishing, it must hav shook Hearns 2 his core.
The24KaratBlack 3 months ago
@The24KaratBlack hearns hadn't learned to clinch, the gym didn't like it apparently.
carmodifire 3 months ago
@carmodifire Most of his fights really didn't call 4 any type of clinching i kno. Even when U hav very powerful punching ability 1 still has 2 B weary of the other guy.
The24KaratBlack 3 months ago
@The24KaratBlack But hearns was also underweight by 2 lbs in this fight, he overtrained. I think he would have won otherwise. He seemed to have bad luck in big fights (broken hand). But, his average chin was an equalizer; if he had a good chin, I don't think he would lose to leonard and Hagler
carmodifire 3 months ago
@carmodifire True True, it didn't take 2 much 2 wobble him. I think Hearns was underweight 4 most of his career.
The24KaratBlack 3 months ago
@carmodifire If only, Hearns would hav stuck 2 the stick & move he was doing 2 survive, a little longer he would hav frustrated Leonard & forced him 2 get reckless, then he could hav got thru wit a deadly straight. He was getting results with the Boxing, good strikers always try 2 rush the knockout.
The24KaratBlack 3 months ago
@carmodifire 2 lbs!!...is that what your excuse is lol that is so lame i know boxers that can knock out 50 lbs bigger then them and win 2lbs is peanuts!
TheDrifta23 4 weeks ago
@carmodifire and also TH was known for k.o power even if 2lbs lighter than SRL he still had more ability 2 k.o him!
TheDrifta23 4 weeks ago
@TheDrifta23 I wasn't talking about the 2 lbs helping punching power, but chin and endurance. It was a very close fight, and Hearns could have been strengthened by the weight. He cut too much weight, and may have pulled through otherwise. Leonard took a punch, the weight would not have affected the punch by a lot.
carmodifire 4 weeks ago
@carmodifire true TH could of been strengthened by a little bit more weight but he still had K.O power and a chin it was just his endurance it was no way a match for SRL and that was with most boxers SRL had endurance then most of them!
TheDrifta23 4 weeks ago
@TheDrifta23 True, SRL had way more endurance. The question is, would Hearns have been able to pull through the last 2 rounds? I don't know. The 12 round era would have helped Hearns' legacy so much more. (Walcott would have decisioned Marciano too)
carmodifire 4 weeks ago
To beat Pacquiao you need to be a good "pure boxer," be willing to use some lateral movement and have a good JAB, and both of these guys proved that they have that in this fight alone. Pac is an awesome slugger, i dont think anyone in his weight division can beat him in a toe to toe battle but he shows little boxing skills. Cotto was most effective against Pac when he created space and boxed him and it was the same with the other guys he fought. Mosley trainer knw, dats why mos tryd to box only
trumpetids 5 months ago
if only they could get rid of all the belts and jst leave 1 for every division that way the champ can really go on to prove himself and fight the mandatory challngers cos these days theres too much politics
Ronz93 5 months ago
good fucking fight
skinniloco1 5 months ago
Talk about role reversal Leonard is the one trying to drop bombs and Hearns is turning the tide back in his favor COME ON RAY!...this is turning into a true classic...
brownhulk2000 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Freddie Roach wouldn't put Manny in the ring with Hearns. I think those guys would lol at manny before laying him out. Dont get me wrong Manny could be one of the best, but not in those days.If you think Manny would beat these guys then he can beat Bernard hopkins too rite?
TooSmoove86s 7 months ago
Freddie Roach wouldn't put Manny in the ring with Hearns. I think those guys would lol at manny before laying him out. Dont get me wrong Manny could be one of the best but, not in those days.If you think Manny would beat these guys then he can beat Bernard hopkins too rite?
TooSmoove86s 7 months ago
Freddie Roach wouldn't put Manny in the ring with Hearns. I think those guys would lol at manny before laying him out. Dont get me wrong Manny could be one of the best but, not in those days.
TooSmoove86s 7 months ago
I miss the good old days of 15 round fights
Lee94503 7 months ago
manny is the best...fck anyone up..
tyboxjr 11 months ago
@tyboxjr He wouldn't do anything two these two legends.
Lcowand1 8 months ago
@tyboxjr pls if you wanna suck pacquiaos dick do it somewhere else not here :) everybody knows that manny pacquiao is a coward
1SugarRayRobinson1 5 months ago
if hagler, hearns, duran and leonard were fighting today dey never would have fought each other
hunip098 1 year ago 4
In a welterweight fight floyd and manny lose to hearns and leonard 100 times out of 100
macwit2cs 1 year ago
At 147 ray leonard was solid man
macwit2cs 1 year ago
Boxers suck now a days omg. When you think about it, there is no talent like this today in the welterweights other than Floyd. Manny is good, but he has no chance against these guys. I have Floyd standing a chance, but I'm not sure.
bballchump11 1 year ago
This is the difference between Pac and Hearns; Hearns was an elite BOXER who knew when to switch from boxer to brawler when he needed to. Also, he had that hard rt. hand punch. PAC is only a brawler he cannot stop and box when he needs to. Look at the 2 Marquez fights and the Morales fights....
svp2010 1 year ago 2
@svp2010 dude pacquaio now is a whole different figher . pacquiao is not in his prime yet....i think . hes still peaking.... hearns has one bg right hand and reach but his flat footed and his chin is not the best... pac would be too fast. legs hand..for hearns
smackdownbb4 1 year ago
@smackdownbb4 hearns could box on the move manny steward just showed how to use his physical gifts better if only harrission was trained by steward he knows how to train tall fighters lewis wladimr , hearns if he is able to etablish his jasb on pac curtains is marga can find pac who weighed 144 wat wuld a hearns who weigh 145-147 possessed much more skill speed and ko power do
shogold10 1 year ago
@smackdownbb4 no way man, ima fan of manny pacquiao but no way he beats tommy hearns, the jab alone would do damage, manny pacquiao is one of the greatest ever but tommy hearns is too and in a welterweight fight hearns would ko manny
macwit2cs 1 year ago
@smackdownbb4 the fuck you smoking Hearns win by way of murder if he fought manny
saloon1st 1 year ago
@svp2010 If you think manny is brawler, you must have slow eyes, and izzzzzzzzzzz that stupid. Don't get mad I'm only 9yrs old so what do I know.
tyboxjr 11 months ago
What a great fight!! They don't make them like that anymore. That could be Mayweather vs Pacquiao. I have faith that it will happen...
chifuli1974 1 year ago
@chifuli1974 pacquiao can relate to those guys and he will trade with them and even knock them out cold..i dnt see floyd being able to handle the type power of those guys back he can box their ears off but yes he wudve avoided them lol
Ronz93 1 year ago
@Ronz93 Pacquiao has NEVER fought a guy of that caliber, much less at welter, beating Cotto is not beating Leonard, beating Marquez is not beating Duran and beating Margarito is not beating Leonard. He would have NO CHANCE against any of those guys in their prime cause Pacquiao doesn't fight guys in their prime. He has fought all those guys after their best years and even so he lost to Morales and IMO vs Marquez the 2nd time. So spare me of the Pac argument...
chifuli1974 1 year ago
@chifuli1974 Spare me of the pac argument. Beating cotto is much more than fghting leonard. Leonard lost to durant, durant isn't the same caliber like manny, if leonard can b hearns, manny can be him easily. People who saw n were close to all fighters, say manny is th best of all time. So you spare me the arguement hater.
tyboxjr 11 months ago
@tyboxjr Ive gotta respectfuly disagree bro,
at 147 against Hearns ,Pac-Man would have an 11 inch reach disadvantage and a 6 inch height disadvantage, to be honest he doesnt have the skill to overcome that
dUbLeA92 3 months ago
7 rounds before ref had to even do anything...this is AWESOME
Metamorphosis33 1 year ago
boxing was way better then. today all you have are these little mexican midgets fighting each other. I don't wanna see Vazquez v Vazques or whatever, the only people who like that are other Mexicans. I'll stick to these old fights from great fighters of the past!!!
gonzomoya420 1 year ago
@gonzomoya420 lol funny guy..vasquez v vasquez lol..yeh true those were the days man,can u beleive these guys uses to slug for 15 rounds,jeeez and we call floyd n pac p4p greats,no disrespect to pac n floyd but those guys make them look cheap especially floyd cos he ducks and cant slug,he's afraid to goe to to toe,pac can relate to those guys cos of his aggression and toe to toe style and not to mention his firepower..floyd cant back them off with his power
Ronz93 1 year ago
it should be manditory to fight top contenders.. boxers shouldnt be able to pick and choose fights.. thats the sucky part.. these new era fighters are suckers.. word to the mutha!
kojicash 1 year ago 27
@kojicash god, you people are sickening..learn to use proper English
ah93704 10 months ago
@ah93704 God, you people are sickening! Learn to use proper English.
bobiletojr 9 months ago
@kojicash on the whole i agree however it depends on the trainer, sometimes you'll get a really good trainer who knows what kinda punishment you can take and what you could possibly win however sometimes you'll get a trainer who only wants to make money and will just throw, for example an amateur in with really experienced boxers
Spuchangersgirl666 3 months ago
boxing was great back then; the top contenders that are expected to fight will fight.
beutflCzk 1 year ago 18