I am reading that book now I started to read it several years ago but had all these other physics books to read , so put it on the back burner.
He is a innovative thinker and I like that, I am not a big fan of consensus science because it is controlled and manipulated. However, I do like the electric universe hypothesis, and question whether the Universe is really expanding at all.
Halton Arp the astronomer claims there is a problem with red shift, kind of throws a big spanner in the works.
@ISOMysterEy- thanks for replying, im not sure i understand it though :) I got 2 E's in science at school! @mikeybrumbrum- i hear ya and understand, but think that humans just dont love all humans- clearly, otherwise there would be no such deprivation. I for one would gladly pay an extra tax, if it was global, regulated properly and fairly distributed among the needy- to me that just makes good sense huh? shame not enough people across the world would agree- 2them charity starts at home i guess?
Can somebody answer if this is a flaw in the expanding atoms theory: If a coffin is buried in the ground, and all atoms expand from their centers, then the coffin is going to inevitably be crushed. This in my mind is due to spatial occupancy. The atoms that occupy the same space are going to expanding into one another- this for an object surrounded would apply more and more force would it not? Hope someone can explain if i sound mad? Cheers! Peace
Well the atoms themselves cannot be crushed, and the object can only be crushed if there is sufficent external pressure. The expanding atoms in a coffin would be exerting an internal pressure in the coffin contually holding it together. The expanding atoms in the ground around and in the whole planet create the pressure of what we call gravity and pressure on the coffin. The amount of force is coorelated to the expansion rate which is what the "4 forces" of nature are derived from.
So all the expansion forces are already accounted for through gravity and the expansion of the dirt and coffin themselves. The atomic forces holding together the molecules and atoms of the coffin are created by the same expansion pressure you mention according to Mark's ideas. In other words the force is already accounted for in the natural world we observe. If you buried a coffin sufficently deep these same forces of expansion on a planetary level are responsible for crushing it.
It doesn't really matter, any of it - not unless you can PROVE it.
You could argue equally as hard, for "constant contraction". The universe "could" just as easilly be contracting, as expanding, and there are conflicting theories.
I would be more tempted to concentrate on the world around us, now, and sorting out its problems, before getting led too far off into talk about "expanding universe theories".
Its amaxing to wonder about these things, but not make work of them, people starve.
I've heard from scientist that at the quantum level what is being experienced are not particles/waves but infinitesimally small holes which are liken to pores of a membrane separating one from which this plane of existence draws the energy to be what it is. It helps them to quantify the existence of other planes of existence (especially the atheists) and better understand what the spirit world may be; an actual parallel realm of this one from which our universe is "created" or comes from.
Yeah resonates is the best word cos its still v controversial- ie: all the opposing arguments have not been fully defeated.
I read the book two years ago and was thrilled by it until I looked for more educated reviews from scientists on the web. I could not find more than one or two and they did not agree with all Mark theories but gave him credit for trying!
Use your intelligence stupid. No one sees electrons directly. Read some more books before posting your stupid opinions on my vlogs. I don't have time for every moron with a third grade education to waste my time with ignorant doubt and stupidity. If you wish to educate your self, you could earn a little repsect, but you sound like a stupid 7th grader trying to grasp quantum physics. First you learn something, then you make comments. You can't even spell properly. Get a life.
ha ha, im not studying it, im just refusing to acept it, until you explain its contradictions.
There are lots of incomplete theories, and the vast majority will never become fact.
And you presume ignorance as being anything different to your doctrine.
There are LOTS more people who disagree with you, than agree.
Or, as you put it, are too stupid to understand that it must be there because you read it in a book, written by someone who gets paid to come up with THEORIES.
Yo read Mark's book, The Final Theory or shut the fuck up. The facts are in the book I just made a very, very short summary of some of them. If you don't read the book then shut the fuck up.
There is a wrong and a divine judgement judgement. You are fighting a straw dog argument, thus wasting your time. Stupid = Closed minded. That would fit you. Closed minded. End of story. I win, you lose. Right and wrong on display. Show some respect you creep.
Wow your suspicious. You can follow whoever the hell you like really. Uh, and actually anyone can understand what I'm saying dumass. Even your dumn ass.
LMAO at the end ... like "hello!? We're friggin filming something here!" how rude of whoever that was. But yea, I don't much about Physics, but this idea resonates with me.
I am reading that book now I started to read it several years ago but had all these other physics books to read , so put it on the back burner.
He is a innovative thinker and I like that, I am not a big fan of consensus science because it is controlled and manipulated. However, I do like the electric universe hypothesis, and question whether the Universe is really expanding at all.
Halton Arp the astronomer claims there is a problem with red shift, kind of throws a big spanner in the works.
whitenightf3 1 year ago
i would listen to you but that continually running water...
McCutcheon has an impeccable hold on the logical inconsistencies,assumptions and dogma that underpin current scientific thinking.
dayvid9 1 year ago
@ISOMysterEy- thanks for replying, im not sure i understand it though :) I got 2 E's in science at school! @mikeybrumbrum- i hear ya and understand, but think that humans just dont love all humans- clearly, otherwise there would be no such deprivation. I for one would gladly pay an extra tax, if it was global, regulated properly and fairly distributed among the needy- to me that just makes good sense huh? shame not enough people across the world would agree- 2them charity starts at home i guess?
CANNIBoy 2 years ago
Can somebody answer if this is a flaw in the expanding atoms theory: If a coffin is buried in the ground, and all atoms expand from their centers, then the coffin is going to inevitably be crushed. This in my mind is due to spatial occupancy. The atoms that occupy the same space are going to expanding into one another- this for an object surrounded would apply more and more force would it not? Hope someone can explain if i sound mad? Cheers! Peace
CANNIBoy 2 years ago
Well the atoms themselves cannot be crushed, and the object can only be crushed if there is sufficent external pressure. The expanding atoms in a coffin would be exerting an internal pressure in the coffin contually holding it together. The expanding atoms in the ground around and in the whole planet create the pressure of what we call gravity and pressure on the coffin. The amount of force is coorelated to the expansion rate which is what the "4 forces" of nature are derived from.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
So all the expansion forces are already accounted for through gravity and the expansion of the dirt and coffin themselves. The atomic forces holding together the molecules and atoms of the coffin are created by the same expansion pressure you mention according to Mark's ideas. In other words the force is already accounted for in the natural world we observe. If you buried a coffin sufficently deep these same forces of expansion on a planetary level are responsible for crushing it.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
That's the best short term explanation I can come up with for now.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
It doesn't really matter, any of it - not unless you can PROVE it.
You could argue equally as hard, for "constant contraction". The universe "could" just as easilly be contracting, as expanding, and there are conflicting theories.
I would be more tempted to concentrate on the world around us, now, and sorting out its problems, before getting led too far off into talk about "expanding universe theories".
Its amaxing to wonder about these things, but not make work of them, people starve.
mikeybrumbrum 2 years ago
You can't prove anything to someone who won't listen.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@mikeybrumbrum
"It doesn't really matter, any of it - not unless you can PROVE it."
Much like the pre-Galaleian scientists could PROVE that the world was flat? You're a fool if you think truth is based solely on mechanistic science.
MrLeagueOJustice 1 year ago
Most of the Standard Theory is just religion incognito.
Piscivorus 2 years ago
I've heard from scientist that at the quantum level what is being experienced are not particles/waves but infinitesimally small holes which are liken to pores of a membrane separating one from which this plane of existence draws the energy to be what it is. It helps them to quantify the existence of other planes of existence (especially the atheists) and better understand what the spirit world may be; an actual parallel realm of this one from which our universe is "created" or comes from.
only1too 2 years ago
Yeah resonates is the best word cos its still v controversial- ie: all the opposing arguments have not been fully defeated.
I read the book two years ago and was thrilled by it until I looked for more educated reviews from scientists on the web. I could not find more than one or two and they did not agree with all Mark theories but gave him credit for trying!
deputydorg 2 years ago
Hey...I've been reading the book when I have time and am confused on his theory of orbits. Can you help me understand?
kylemv132002 3 years ago
Have yu ever SEEN any of htis ? NO !
mikeybrumbrum 3 years ago
Use your intelligence stupid. No one sees electrons directly. Read some more books before posting your stupid opinions on my vlogs. I don't have time for every moron with a third grade education to waste my time with ignorant doubt and stupidity. If you wish to educate your self, you could earn a little repsect, but you sound like a stupid 7th grader trying to grasp quantum physics. First you learn something, then you make comments. You can't even spell properly. Get a life.
ISOMysterEy 3 years ago
ha ha, im not studying it, im just refusing to acept it, until you explain its contradictions.
There are lots of incomplete theories, and the vast majority will never become fact.
And you presume ignorance as being anything different to your doctrine.
There are LOTS more people who disagree with you, than agree.
Or, as you put it, are too stupid to understand that it must be there because you read it in a book, written by someone who gets paid to come up with THEORIES.
Why are NO facts !!
mikeybrumbrum 3 years ago
Yo read Mark's book, The Final Theory or shut the fuck up. The facts are in the book I just made a very, very short summary of some of them. If you don't read the book then shut the fuck up.
ISOMysterEy 3 years ago
Oh, i see, you;ve read a book, so you know everything ?
Normally, when peopel resort to insults its because they have no sensible arguement. I presume this is the case, for you.
If someone writes a book about tiny invisible fairies, i wont belive that either. Even if you swear at me.
And WHO did you say sounds uneducated ? Not convinced about somethind does not make you stupid.
But at YOUR level of intelligence, there is right and wrong, and you can NOT imagine a 3rd option.
Thats STOOOPID.
mikeybrumbrum 3 years ago
There is a wrong and a divine judgement judgement. You are fighting a straw dog argument, thus wasting your time. Stupid = Closed minded. That would fit you. Closed minded. End of story. I win, you lose. Right and wrong on display. Show some respect you creep.
ISOMysterEy 2 years ago
So its exactl the same as Christianity, except there is no cross ?
Could we have cross shaped electrons or something ? It would fit in ok with Cristianity then.
And preferably circumcised electrons, too, for the jews and muslims ?
If not, then sod off, cus no one is ever gonna believ the "invisible" stories, ever again ? Weve heard it all before.
Its too small for us to see, and you only know its there cus you are so much smarter than us, and can see it in your mind.
Lets follow YOU!
mikeybrumbrum 3 years ago
Wow your suspicious. You can follow whoever the hell you like really. Uh, and actually anyone can understand what I'm saying dumass. Even your dumn ass.
ISOMysterEy 3 years ago
LMAO at the end ... like "hello!? We're friggin filming something here!" how rude of whoever that was. But yea, I don't much about Physics, but this idea resonates with me.
CoolRaul28 3 years ago
Yeah she wanted us to take a picture of her. Thanks for the comments.
ISOMysterEy 3 years ago