Magnet Free Energy Perpetual Motion Device

[ascalar]

esto no es energia libre solo es algo gastando energia sinpoder usarla.

[TheEyesontheskies]

I don't understand the reasoning behind claims that such devices would put electricity companies out of business. Wouldn't they just monopolise on any such principle as well, making it illegal to build and run your own, while still charging us outrages prices to access the energy they create via whatever means?

[The3rdPlateau]

This is a motor. This is how electrical motors work.

[TheZanrick]

I was curious to see if you had a similar design to that of my own perpetual motion devise that also uses magnets. I was disappointed to see that you had simply hooked up some electromagnets to make a motor. There is nothing perpetual about your design what so ever. You are and always will be a fraud.

[FoxLogicBox]

@TheZanrick dude, its not like he is hiding the electromagnets. They are part of the design. When the magnet passes the outer coil it builds up a charge in a capacitor. When the magnet is right in the center of the outer coil the capacitor discharges the built up electricity into a smaller, more tightly wound inner coil which produces a repulsive effect. Each time the magnet passes the coil rig it spanks the magnet forward, with only the resistive force of the magnet passing the coil

[FoxLogicBox]

@TheZanrick Way to jump to conclusions, calling people a fraud, without any understanding of what you are looking at.

[Genebx]

Found this vid researching Tesla generator. Cool idea, and beautiful music!

[88seanster]

I see a crude DC motor here? did I miss something? what does that do that scrap PC fan cant?

[JohnSmith18989]

the design of this device is very simplistic......

If you are in need of more plans of Perpetual motion Magnetic Generator..

Do a Google search for "Top Magnetic Generator" ...

Choose the First Result (Skip the Advertisements)

[FoxLogicBox]

@JohnSmith18989 Don't do it, its a waste of time. And its infected with something.

[billkortenbach]

As I see it, he is not getting something from nothing. This is not a true perpetual motion device. He is manipulating a pre-existing power- magnetic force. To me, this makes perfect sense. Just as the auto industry has successfully controlled inventions that would affect their profit margins, so the power companies have waylaid and delayed this technical knowledge. The only difference in this case is the internet, which they cannot control.

[rstevewarmorycom]

If he is cheating people, they will sue him or the police

will be called to pursue fraud charges, and a jury of

people will figure out what he's doing, bet on it. You'll

find that it's better not to be one of his first victims,

however, because he has more time to spend your

money before he's caught. There is no "free energy"

except for solar, wind, geothermal, and tidal/hydro.

There are good reasons why, but of course you

paranoids wouldn't listen anyway.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom In fact nothing in science prevents energy from being amplified, redirected, and modified, and drawn upon freely. You are quoting every other 'skeptic' in the world, with information you don't understand, that is not even valid as an argument against free energy. Your 'good reasons why' refers to natural resistive force, and says nothing at all about free energy being impossible. It simply refers to the way shit trys to work naturally, and you are a tool.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Energy cannot be "amplified". You

have misunderstood what amplification is. Amplification

is when a small controlling energy controls a much bigger

source of energy. The controlling energy is NOT multiplied,

it is ONLY used to CONTROL the larger power supply.

There is no way to draw upon energy that is not there,

and no way to draw upon energy except by having it

flow from a "source" to a "sink". This is why the void

is not some magical source of free-energy.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom You are assuming that I do not understand that. Gravity and magnetism are constant forces that work without any help from us smart guy so your thinking is too narrow of scope. You CAN use a natural force to amplify a mechanical force. There IS no way to draw energy that aint there, but there is most likely energy we have not yet harnessed or even detected. It is possible science doesn't know something, and its definitely possible YOU don't know something.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Tell ya what, when you find something

like that, THEN bother us with it, otherwise you're just

blowing it out your ass. When you find something to

run your car on nothing, we'd all like to hear about it,

but no more of these scams, please.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom Dude. Really think real hard about this one now. If I told you I had something like that would you believe me? Obviously not. There must be some flaw in your thinking, because at this rate, anything that goes against what YOU think, will be the same as invisible (real or not). You are incapable of accepting any other claim, as are most scientists, so why would any of you even believe a REAL claim? That is incredibly redundant, useless, and small thinking.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox What you don't grasp is that to physicists,

the nature of a real claim and the nature of a wrong claim

are virtually always obviously different and discernible.

The wrong claim always involves contradicting known

principles, while real claims involve wholly new principles.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox The sources

of energy are several, sunlight, old sunlight, nuclear.

Old sunlight is petroleum and coal, and in a way nuclear,

because the radioactive nuclides were cooked in stars.

Otherwise solar, wind, tidal-hydro are the only sources

and they all come from sunlight.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom I applaud you godlike powers to be able to know everything without question. Don't be fooled by your arrogance. You are just repeating things you've heard, and NOT using logic whatsoever. By the way that is totally not true. Gravitational force, Magnetic force, Almost perpetual axial rotation of every planet and particle in the entire fucking universe, the hot air coming out of your head. And those are just some of the natural forces we KINDA understand.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Now you're confusing knowledge with

omniscience and motion with energy. You don't seem

to realize that we are all governed by the same natural

laws, and that knowledge about them does in fact exist.

And you imagine that if anyone claims knowledge that

it means that they are claiming perfection, and that's just

not necessary to actually know something for certain.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom You're right. You don't have to actually know something for certain, but while you are doing that you have to remember, that the information might not be correct! I really cannot fathom what is going on inside your head that makes you think so badly.I think you are the one confusing what I am saying with omniscience.All I am saying is that you pretend to know, but you only assume, so don't act like anything outside of the scope of your knowledge is impossible.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom Also. Objects in motion possess kinetic energy (seems like you should have known that).

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Sure, but when you take it away from

them, they stop. They aren't a useful source of energy.

They only store energy. They also gain a very very very

tiny amount of mass when they have kinetic energy,

did you know that? E=Mc^2, remember?

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox What I'm saying is that you can indeed know that 2 + 2

= 4 without having to know every possible math theorem

that could ever exist, and the 2 + 2 = 4 isn't going to just

change on you if you learn the more complicated things.

Some of the people here are in effect trying to pretend

that 2 + 2 = 4 is not a definite law. And they're trying to

get you to believe it and give them money!!

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom This is not as simple as 2+2=4. Your statement implies that we know all of the factors involved in the mechanisms in question which, when dealing with invisible forces, is absolutely retarded. Even if you know all of the factors, as you think, you can not claim to have that kind of a grasp on it. You should look up logical fallacies before you try thinking to much more cuz you are full of em'. Your losing all that intellectual authority your degree entails.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox "This is not as simple as 2+2=4"

To YOU, to you. This stuff you see on YouTube is

simply NOT any kind of cutting-edge stuff, I know

you have trouble grasping that, but it is so. And gee,

I didn't see any "authority" on my diploma at all.

[rstevewarmorycom]

All I'm amazed is how many gullible nutcakes can be

found on one page. There's no conspiracy to prevent

this, it simply doesn't work. Him showing it work without

anybody watching what he's secretly doing, or watching

what mistakes he makes in his understanding, proves

zero, zip, nada. If he can make them and sell them, then

his customers will figure it out when they read their power

bill. Nobody is stopping him, nobody can, nobody will.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom I'm amazed at how people are incapable of believing there is something they might not know about. You are so secure in your faith in what science says, that you forgo actually understanding it, and take other people say as a writ. How is everyone who trys to stretch their perspective is a 'nutcake'. What is stopping this kind of stuff is tards like you who could never be convinced, without the stamp of convention. "Look through the fucking telescope!"-Galileo

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Your only argument is "the unknown".

I didn't spend the best decade of my life learning

physics intensively at college and university without

coming to know when someone is making a first-year

student error or engaging in a popular misunderstanding.

This stuff has been tried before by budgets big enough

to make you gag and we have come to a set of tentative

conclusions about the nature of reality from these

experiments.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom You think 10 years of your life makes you impervious to popular misunderstanding? or your professeurs, for that matter? Did this knowledge come from your superior mind, or a collection of books?Your knowledge, is filtered by arrogance, that your education you put so much work into is infallible. Education is no substitute for intelligence, nor are the two exclusive to one another. You might be in the field, but you will never be an innovator with that mindset.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Would you please stop whining about

anybody who's smarter than you are. I don't need to

be perfect to know you're wrong about something

simple that I know and you don't.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom Ad Heminem. Personal attacks don't prove you are smarter that me. They just prove you are an asshole. Also, basically what I am hearing is "I have no argument, but I still know you are wrong."

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox (Ad hominem) You are quite right.

But they are often fun when one is frustrated.

And I have lots of arguments, but they are mathematical.

I don't even know how to type many of them here.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom Your only argument is, "Nothing unknown is possible". Now why is that better than speculating on the unknown again?

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox If that WERE my argument, you'd be

right. Unfortunately...

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox So you see, we HAVE looked through many

countless "telescopes" and they have told us the same things,

which we have organized into laws that VERY successfully

predict and explain the world to a known degree. We're not

talking 99% right, we're not talking 99.99999% right, we're

talking about quantum electrodynamics and quantum mechanics

getting it right to 99.9999_ continuing for 80 places % right.

It is the tiny rest of it that is still puzzling.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom Dude. I was making a Galileo reference, so ..... ummm .. put it away dude. We can all see your education hanging out there, and we are all mighty impressed. (Also, look up Galileo's telescope, since you like data so much.)

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox We're really sorry

that you weren't born in the 18th or 19th century where you

could be the one to discover lots of totally new stuff that is

shocking, but the work got done, and you're late, AND you

don't yet even know what the fuck you're talking about.

Go study physics and quit fantasizing.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom Wow dude. Really? We have it all figured out? You should really do some research on theoretical physics, yourself. That will speak for itself in proving how stupid your post here is, not to mention.... Dude. Simple logic, and history will tell you that in the 19th and 18th and 17th .. hell all the centuries, the 'realists' always think they knew what was up. Look at FUCKING PRECEDENT. The 'realists' are NEVER RIGHT. Your degree aint worth shit without a brain.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox All you clowns think that scientists used to

be lots more stupid, and THEY thought THEY were right

back then TOO! You don't really grasp that Science barely

began until the 20th century, and that nothing like science

ever existed before. They didn't DO "experiments" to find

out what was true, they guessed or made religious

proclamations. There was no Science back then. It

was a guessing game and everyone played because

nobody had anything figured out.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox And so, yes, as far as you will ever grasp,

we have everything that's being discussed in these scam

pages of YouTube all figured out. You don't like it, but it's true.

[cloverpark2011]

im curious how you connected all the other five coils to this generator. i have built one myself and am only getting very little charge back and yet it seems like im taking energy from one battery to the other and nothing is being restored period. can you help me out with this or send me a schematic to help me better understand. thanks and nice job !

[t4585]

It's called the third law of thermodynamics

[Devorvan]

@t4585 this isn't thermodynamics, it's physics

[t4585]

@Devorvan Thermodynamics govern physics. It is impossible to get more energy out of a system than is put into it... there is always a loss in the conversions.

[Devorvan]

@t4585 Maybe you should have a look at what makes every galaxy possible. And theres no battery for that, yet makes everything go round

[willevs57]

@t4585 wouldn't be the first time "proven science" doesn't add up

[FoxLogicBox]

@t4585 Dude thermodynamics does not govern 'reality'. The fact is that no energy needs to be created to amplify force. For every action is an equal and opposite reaction, and if you could harness the energy from both ends you would have unity (well with friction and gravity maybe slightly less). If you can add to that unity, any simple constant natural force such as electromagnetism, you now have over-unity. Quoting 200 year old scientific scripture does not make you seem smart.

[FoxLogicBox]

@t4585 What does thermodynamics say about the atom again?

[FoxLogicBox]

@t4585 Even if we were to go with this -hundreds of years old- theory as fact, what is preventing us from getting around thermodynamics with some kind of 'trick'. Some guy, a long time before any modern technology, came up with some conclusions based on math, and not real world applications. He had no clue that we might someday have holograms, and vacuuming pet robots or the technical leaps that had to be made. "Impossible" is a seriously arrogant and shortsighted claim. Very scientific.

[syanivmax]

@snathanmax

There is an Engineer that explain what is the best magnetic generator

you can find his website by searching Google for:

"best magnetic generator review"

[gfs2012]

YOU CAN NOT CREATE ENERGY ,ONLY CONVERT ENERGY !. MAYBE GOING BACK TO FINISH HIGH SCHOOL WOULD BE A GOOD IDEA ,THINK

[Devorvan]

@gfs2012 dude, google "how are galaxies created?" You will find more information than what it seems you learnt in school, bud

[Addepat]

@gfs2012 Yes, thats what you learn at school........

[gabusjr]

fake and gay

[gatto012]

yeah, and under the table? idiot son of a bitch mother fuker, give me back the time lost for to see ur shit video

[dwsdesigns77]

Most of these comments made me laugh... especially the ones who really think they are smarter than the possibility of a thing called "over-unity". Some folks just need to study a little more before they leave their opinions that they actually believe to be the truth. You should never believe most things that you read. There's so much out there that only a small percentage of people have the ability to even imagine. It's all very real...we just have yet to write the proper equations.

[villainvest]

Is that a skateboard wheel in the middle

[devientrazz]

If you used the electrical output from the RPM of the rotating magnets you could power it since it gives off more electrical output and requires very little electrical input.

[99helldemon]

this video is bull shit. its just a mother fucking Rollerblade wheel!!!! its not actually spinning around. its just the light around it that makes it look like it is.

[kasmackba]

Kids, this video is your brain on drugs - stay in school!

[Almagest77]

Yes you lose some energy via friction, key word being some. Perpetual energy has been around since Tesla's time. J.P.Morgan pulled the funding for continued research.

[Xero555000]

@Almagest77 ... yes the key word is some... some being enough to put efficiency below 100% JP morgan pulled the funding because tesla was a scam artist lol... like the owner of this channel. Don't kid yourself with your BS conspiracy theories... just because it makes for a good yarn doesnt mean it's true... use your brain for once

[Bugstomper2]

Why is it only on You Tube that we get hundreds of videos claiming to have a Perpetual Motion Machine?. Did any of you inventors ever finish physics in high school? What's the law of conservation of energy? ~ "A consequence of the law of energy conservation is that perpetual motion machines can only work perpetually if they deliver no energy to their surroundings." ~ So it can't have any friction, because friction generates heat, & heat is energy loss! Moving parts cause friction!

[LiamXaoh]

Wow! An electrically powered spinning rotor. The world is saved. However it is not even close to free energy nor is it perpetual motion.

[maikeru01]

Sure you can move that thing around and around but you need batteries to do that and mathematically you can not possibly be generating more energy with the magnets than what the magnets are receiving from the batteries and because of friction it will be a little less actually, so youre better off just connecting the batteries directly to the thing you are trying to power than to use them to power this generator.

[videojunkieMAN]

@maikeru01

In other words. No perpetual motion. However I believe magnets do have a certain lifetime. I read once it was like 500 years. So in either case, there is no such thing as perpetual energy. It'd be cool though. :P

[Devorvan]

@maikeru01 take the time to study zero-point magnetism. Every galaxy is created by 2 or more forces that pull each other in, yet never meet while they spin around constantly. But yeah it's slow, there are faster ones out there that generate a lot more energy than this one, and since they will be small and won't interfere with our own galaxies magnetic rotation it's definitely real and better than any other power source.

[jdogsful]

in both directions amplifies the Power output by around x4.. also, as silly as it sounds, i once saw a picture of a crop circle, and as soon as i saw it, it was so apparent to me koz iv fantasising about trying to create my idea for a design for years, but when i saw the crop design, instantly i noticed that it was just like my design i'd been mentally crafting, but it was 2D, and simplified but more complex than i could ever think of. But i felt reassured that i was gettin close to an idea

[jdogsful]

@jdogsful "koz iv fantasising about trying to create my idea for a design for years" by this i meant mag-gen design, not crop formation, jus to clarify

[jdogsful]

You magnificent Bastard! She looks pretty too. Definitely one of the most effective looking ones out there, iv seen. How much output can baby generate? Oh man, imagine these as larger scale electro-mag, high powered generators. Forget wind turbines. You could stack more mag-gens atop one another and have rows of small compact Mag-gens towers spread throughout cities. Or get a small one for homes.. i saw a David Sereda film once, explaining that a rodins coil coiled around a doughnut magnet

[wyrrox]

Still haven't seen you in the news...

[vasgeorge]

@wyrrox you idiot. Controlled media by the governments dont want him to be in the news, cause devices like this would destroy the whole monetary system and oil companies would disappear.So hard to understand?

[MucusFelidae]

@vasgeorge: "you idiot"

You idiot. Stupid babbling ignorant cunt.

So hard to understand?

[EquusFerrarius]

@vasgeorge If the media was controled by the government and they wanted to prevent this "technology" from going public then this video would not exist.

[vasgeorge]

@EquusFerrarius the mainstream media is controlled you moron,not youtube...

[EquusFerrarius]

@vasgeorge "They" can control television, newspapers, universities and schools. "They" can determine the energy policy of every nation on earth, the USA, the Russian Fedderation, Iran, North Korea and India are all prevented by "them" from using this technology. But "they" do not have the power to delete a youtube video and scilence it's maker.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@EquusFerrarius Of course "they" would, if there

was this "they", as you say, they wuld stomp youtube

into the ground like you say "they" have everywhere

else. It's not special. But there ain't no "they".

There's only us.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom "They" refers to the other team. There is ALWAYS a "they". Your perspective is marginal. Are you one of the "us" that owns enough money to feed nations, makes policy, has millions of people desperate to believe that 'they' do exactly what we are told they do what, and how they say, and is willing to go online and down people for wondering? YOU sure as hell are NOT one of those 'they', and you have no clue how that class of people function. WE are completely separate from THEY.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox If you knew how wrong you were you'd

be embarrassed. I'm just a semi-impoverished engineer-

physicist who gets really tired of seeing my own profession

being misused and corrupted by these online SCAMS!

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom God damn, you must be the smartest man alive. I AM embarrassed - that I belong to the same species as you.If you are going to tell me that, just because studying this shit was difficult, and complicated to you, that proves the information you learned correct? What about any of what I said should I be embarrassed about? The fact that you think you know better that everyone else? Did you ever think maybe your a moron, and you don't even understand your own work?

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox I don't have to even be really smart

to know what's wrong with the crap they spew around

here. I don't have to be very bright at ALL to know

that you don't.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox And that is what free-energy/over-unity/run your car on

water/ all of them, that's what they are, back of the comic

book SCAMS that DO NOT WORK, and which you should

NEVER waste your hard earned money on.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom So by your statements, I can assume that if a new invention ever comes out that fits those definitions, in theory now, and it was real, it would never be taken seriously because everyone with a degree thinks they possess rock solid knowledge, and would hate to think they studied for years just to not have a clue what they are talking about. I am also going to assume you haven't tried all of them, to make that statement, and are going solely on theory.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox We know what's been tried. If somebody

makes a claim about something we haven't tried, we'll know it

and try it. That turns out to be something important only VERY

rarely. We're talking winning the PowerBall or MegaMillions

here. The chances are smaller than minute. Usually physics

wastes more time and effort checking this stuff out yet again

than it does on a lot of research, and it turns out to be the

same old SCAM hokum.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox The people

promoting these are criminals, many have been in prison

for it before, their names are well-known by the FBI and

they will try to tell you that anyone criticizing them are

"government agents" or "corporate agents" or "Russian

agents", anything to keep you from believing real scientists

trying to keep you from getting stolen from.

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom That point, has another cause, that you will refuse to consider, but not because it is any less logical, or possible, but just because you are dogmatized. People who could buy and sell governments (and colleges), don't want us to have free energy. Simple. What is so unlikely about that? You think these guys made all their money by not paying attention to competition? That is what sounds unlikely to me.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox I agree, the people invested in oil

don't want people to dump oil tomorrow, but they also

know that can't likely happen, because THEY know

some physics TOO, and they know you won't likely

find anything. What they DO try to stop BIG time is

the things that actually *DO* work, like solar and wind,

but they are now failing at that so the big money is

just this year switching to wind and solar.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox They just

didn't want to have to spend the money rebuilding and

retooling yet, because it cuts into their party money.

Dumping all the oil equipment is a staggering amount

of wealth down the tubes. But remember, THEY'RE

running out of oil TOO, and they both want to get in

on that, and they don't want the social structure in which

they are rich and privileged to collapse. So expect them

to try to steal what works, not destroy what does not.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox

They will try to monopolize solar and wind, and in a century

they might have it all under their thumb again. Barring a

revolution. But in the meantime, we have a bunch of new

players bringing stuff out that works, solar, wind, tidal,

hot-rock geothermal, earth heat geothermal, and then there's

the insulation and retrofit businesses, which will grow startlingly

in the next ten years, as well as low-impact vehicles. If you look

for magic you could be VERY disappointed.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox And we do it why?

Because they give all of science, engineering, physics, and

alternative energy a bad name when they do that and at a time

when alternative energy is the only hope of the world surviving!!

They are cravenly venal and thieving, and they don't CARE if the

world survives, as long as they get their lifetime party at your

expense!!

[FoxLogicBox]

@rstevewarmorycom I think YOU are the type that gives science a bad name.Your ego and your closed mind, do nothing to progress the human race, or knowledge. It's just kind of wasting people's time. Why would you care what people say if they are completely wrong? If they're NOT frauds (of course whatever you say must be incontrovertible fact), then you are being a total fuckwad right now and you would NEVER know, as long as you think you already know everything.

[rstevewarmorycom]

@FoxLogicBox Why would I care? Precisely because it

is wasting people's time and money on the slimmest possible

bet when there are TONS of things out there that REALLY *DO*

work, and this stuff here is giving all of it together a bad name

because a lot of people, as evidenced here, can't tell the difference

between the two!!

[FoxLogicBox]

@vasgeorge Just so you know: YouTube CAN be controlled through manipulation such as paying people post messages on videos that make it seem like a popular, and thus, a 'cool' thing to do to "Troll". Thus making it more difficult to have fair conversation. Also, I am SURE plenty of these UFOs and free energy devices are complete Bullschite. That makes it really damn difficult to find the real ones.