@fordtruckman7878 Whats Ford, then? Chinese?? Well... I wouldnt be surprised if some chinese or some other BRIC's company bought Ford: 80% of their cars SUCKS BALLS! Go have a lecture with Volkswagen or Mercedes, Ford.
And to think idiots will go out and buy this because they think they will be safe. A standard size car will protect you better than this into a ridged object, whilst not overriding other cars in a collision, therefore making the roads safer for all.
these model are the cheaper ones ...that are built and sent to my country and other third world places...... and the people here are stupid are blinded by their ego's so the buy them ............( thats why i drive a Land Rover Defender )
This is a euro ranger it would never pass USA standers and would not in a million years pass Canadian. They build them there cheaper tosave money and this is what happens
@MichaelLarson29 Honestly mate, no idea why you are pointing at Europe. Euro NCAP has the strictest safety tetst of all and this would not get on the road here. Which may explain why I have never ever seen one of them anywhere in Europe I have been.
People are dumb, they all think that when a car deforms like that, it's bad. When really it's absorbing the impact so the driver doesn't get the shit knocked out of him.
Lol if you want the cabin of your car to do THAT, then go right ahead and buy one of those. Personally I like the idea of surviving and not having the cabin of my car breached.
This is NOT the same Ranger sold in the US and Canada, it is the one sold in Mexico, Europe, and Asia. Its a totally different truck, built on a completely different platform, not even the engines are the same.
@BadHaddy Seriously doubt this one was actually sold as such in Europe. Euro NCAP has the strictest safety tests of all and this would not get on the road here. Which may explain why I have never ever seen one of them anywhere in Europe I have been.
americans suck big dick, no offence, but my uncle thought the same until he got an OPEL, a Toyota, a Mitsubishi, he liked the Mitsubishi & the Toyota the most, but all three were much better than the americans he owned.
I wanted one of these things.....luckily i decided to wait for the all new aussie 2012 model......going to see a crash test on that baby before i think of purchasing one......check out the Geely its a chines peice of poo and does a far better job.....come on FORD/MAZDA lift your game and get those thai's to build better utes
@Cycleian No they don't. Ford did not own Mazda when Mazda designed this particular vehicle, they bought part of Mazda afterwards. And Ford have since sold their share in Mazda. And Ford do not design all of Mazda's vehicles. Do some research before you make bold statements. Don't make statements on something you obviously have limited knowledge on.
This European Ranger is a Mazda badged as a Ford. The North American Ranger is a Ford design and performs much better in the offset 40mph test even though it is a much older design dating back to 1983. I don't understand why they didn't just sell the much tougher North American Ranger in Europe instead of this junk. I have lived in both of these parts of the world and owned both examples of Ranger so I have experience to base my opinion on.
I always thought the Mazda B series and the American Ranger were the same, as the ford Escape and Mazda tribute are the same. And the ranger shown here is the Brazilian version (bad manufactured). . Chek out the Ford EcoSport made in Brazil, just a piece of shiet.
@harmankardonbose Yeah the B series sold in North America is the same as the North American Ranger. It is a Ford design. The Mazda pickup sold in Europe though is a completely different vehicle which the European Ranger is based on and they're a Mazda design.
64 kmh is equal to 40 miles and as that it is crashing into a concret slab, the forces transmitted are equivilant to the same car travelling at 55 kmh and hitting the car with half the crumple zone. Pickups have notorioulsy always been bad at crash tests with a 5 star safety pickup being achieved only recently.
WHAT!? Thats laughable, 4x4's stopped crumpling like this 12 years ago! Every other manufacturer at least got 4 or 5 stars in 2008, trust it to be FORD! Lol
the ero Ranger ia really a Mazda old school with Mazda frame and body, not the US Ranger that you see in the states. the new 2010 ranger sold in asia and the Australia and the euro is now the same as the USA Ranger.
HAHA, Americans think their big SUVs are "safe." The chassis on that piece of junk seems to be made out of tin foil. For a giant car like that, I would expect it to be built like a rock. @ 60mph, you don't even see a dent on a German car doors. Hopefully we can shape up our shit and start to compete with the world before Hyundai starts releasing more $20,000 sports cars. Did you know that 50% of the cost of every American car goes to someone's pension?
The Ranger is sold on more continents in this world than the whole F series range combined.You forget, ANY vehicle that has a ladder chassis is prone to suffer from POOR crash test results.If you EVER watched ANY form of top level car racing, you will see that the vehicles dissipate on impact to SAVE THE DRIVER!..old school like the trucks,can handle huge impacts and suffing minimal damage BUT, the stored energy has to be removed somehow and guess who is next inline...YOU..
@TREVILZE I don't know what kind of bullshit racing cars your looking at. I'm more interested in the "real" racing cars at Le Mans and Formula F1 where they crash at 200mph, replace the front end in 20 minutes, and continue for another 14 hours. Those bullshit NASCAR stock cars are garbage and were only designed to turn in one direction for each race.
@BarackHOsama Next time watch on F1 what happens when they hit a barrier and if you have ever bothered to watch the making of an F1 car you would have known the car is desgined to break up on impact, wheels first...etc....I have NEVER seen in F1 or Le Man's a race car hit a barrier at 200mph and survive for a front end rebuild...LOL..Next time search for energy dissipation and understand how it impacts on car design...even race cars.
@TREVILZE So there are no crashes at 200mph? I have seen a LOT of crashes where the cars were doing ~200mph. Obviously a head on crash would be fatal, but they are also equipped with high end brakes and skilled drivers that are able to swerve and lessen the impact. Do you really think all their crashes are only at 40mph like this video? And YES, there are parts which crush on impact, but they are easily replaceable. The tub remains unscathed. If the whole car crumbles on impact ppl will die!
@ArticMuse it's rarly that i see this car on the road here , compared to F150 this is a crap and only crap , maybe it's a model produced in Europe or somewhere else ,
ive got a 96 bronco lifted with 37's and i wrecked it head on and the only thing i came out with was a bent bumper and bend on the drivers side of front axle lol the whole frame and body didnt collapse on impact! haha didnt even crack a headlight
@ArticMuse cause if a car would be made in 2 inch steel, the force on the driver would kill him on the hit. when it deform, it absorb a lot of energy....
good to know, but i wonder is this truck really focus on being used on the road or off road? impact at 64km/h on dirt road is just plain suicidal while using it on the road, there is a good chance if it going to hit something, it will hit a small cars where the truck still fare better according to the law of physic
guys dont comment badly on this until you see the nissan navara crah test with only half a star for crash protection in 2008! a rover 100 from years back was better than it!
this is the "global" version of the Ranger the rest of the world knows. Ford never used it in the US for this very reason, it wouldnt meet US saftey standards.
people in other countries think we live in the stone age cause some of our vehicles are outdated because even some brand new vehicles are very old designs. but they dont realize that there are good reasons we dont use the "global" models.
I have seen cars from the 70s survive better than that, guess this is Fords idea of a good truck for the Euro market, my dad had an Isuzu (which is Chevrolet underneath) cope much better
@04Wenban People don't buy American cars for their reliability, plain and simple. On an episode of Top Gear, Clarkson takes a 30 year old Toyota pickup, rams it several times into trees, drops it from cranes, submerges it in water overnight, and a host of other things, and it still worked! It required to be set on fire for it to finally stop working.
This is not the american version of the Ranger, because the Americna version doesn't twist like this in a offset crash. This is some shitty Euro version of the Ranger.
Of course they would work, it's an vital safety equipment that can save your life. Ford obviously spared no expensive when it comes to durability and safety.
If you review the test results over at NCAP, the survival rate (at least not without horrific injuries to legs) is quite slim. It didn't even score three stars.
Someone said that smaller cars get totalled and this type of car only requires a new bumper.
A crash is all about energy dissipation. Crumpling is by design. As long as the internal cage remains intact, I rather be in a small car with crumple zones than a big one that channels all the forces involved into the passengers...
any of you ever see what happens when a little honda civic, or toyota or some thing rear ends a real american made truck . the truck drives off and gets a new bumber the car is totaled
Pick up trucks in America dont have to be crash tested btw, because they are commercial vehicles. You will find that in a crash test they will crumple like a coke can!
Their are many different versions of the Ranger made in different parts of the world. The Thai versions are not that reliable from what I've read. The U.S versions are built MUCH MUCH better and run a lot longer.
Wow, no surprise: Ford SUCKS...
rodrigorosatoalves 3 weeks ago
thats why ford sales are shit around the wolrd
alteclansing3333 2 months ago
@alteclansing3333 That aint no american truck, asshole!
fordtruckman7878 1 month ago
@fordtruckman7878 Whats Ford, then? Chinese?? Well... I wouldnt be surprised if some chinese or some other BRIC's company bought Ford: 80% of their cars SUCKS BALLS! Go have a lecture with Volkswagen or Mercedes, Ford.
rodrigorosatoalves 3 weeks ago
Typical fords living up to there expectation in the UK
mrdjc100 2 months ago
shit
unthedeadstory2 3 months ago
And to think idiots will go out and buy this because they think they will be safe. A standard size car will protect you better than this into a ridged object, whilst not overriding other cars in a collision, therefore making the roads safer for all.
bommmmmmmm 3 months ago
these model are the cheaper ones ...that are built and sent to my country and other third world places...... and the people here are stupid are blinded by their ego's so the buy them ............( thats why i drive a Land Rover Defender )
islanddudeable 4 months ago
The all-new 2012 Ranger did 5*, the 2008 is based on an american car...
Agoka47 4 months ago
'98 ranger did better
benkimimyaa 4 months ago
I wish all the Trini's with rangers could see this......Want to see who's boasting now.....
islanddudeable 4 months ago
Ford Danger
1ns4ne1d10t 4 months ago 12
This car will effectively reduce the redneck count in the US.
KeskinTRS 4 months ago
This is a euro ranger it would never pass USA standers and would not in a million years pass Canadian. They build them there cheaper tosave money and this is what happens
MichaelLarson29 5 months ago
@MichaelLarson29 Honestly mate, no idea why you are pointing at Europe. Euro NCAP has the strictest safety tetst of all and this would not get on the road here. Which may explain why I have never ever seen one of them anywhere in Europe I have been.
Efteling4Ever 2 months ago
Talk about American goods.....
This is why we don't buy our local goods anymore.....
Athrunwong 5 months ago
lol, the chassis broke in half!
ballader1 6 months ago
2 stars!! And seems like a monster at its size! =P
GamerAndReviewer 6 months ago
Wow, looks bad...
XxBakerxX72 6 months ago
another american shit
aby9005 7 months ago in playlist crash test 4
@aby9005 that is NOT the north american ranger. it is the euro. that would not be aloud on our road. dill weed
stegomon 6 months ago
@aby9005 you realize this was european design...
newzen5 4 months ago
@aby9005
American?¿?¿?¿? This car is builted in Thailand...
Avilesino24 4 months ago
@aby9005 This Ranger is not American you shithead its european thats why its so shitty hhahahaha!!!!!!!!
drMINDdamage 2 months ago
Looks Like A Redbull Can Getting Smashed!
daddyjankie 7 months ago
And that's why we don't have the 4-door version in the United States...
sciroccoguy 7 months ago
hahahah ford is trying to kill off Europeans
jonesd5o 7 months ago
FORD. BUILT TOUGH.
nascar1998 8 months ago
@Anthoniz4life except thats new, and this is 4 years old...
jaffacake1578 8 months ago
It looked like someone dumped in the pickup bed. That would bi-ass test results.
seapeddler 8 months ago
People are dumb, they all think that when a car deforms like that, it's bad. When really it's absorbing the impact so the driver doesn't get the shit knocked out of him.
techndeck 9 months ago
@techndeck The Ranger got 3/16 in the front test...
Jubbbbb 9 months ago
@techndeck absorbing with crumble zones is great, but the cabin should say stable, it looks like to me you don't know much about car safety ;)
ballader1 8 months ago
@techndeck
Lol if you want the cabin of your car to do THAT, then go right ahead and buy one of those. Personally I like the idea of surviving and not having the cabin of my car breached.
133maxiboy 8 months ago
@133maxiboy I have a Porsche Cayenne and in further review I did notice the structural integrity to be poor.
techndeck 8 months ago
@techndeck
Well I dont think the Porsche will have those problems!
133maxiboy 8 months ago
@133maxiboy Agreed, let's hope it doesn't even get that far. I'd cry to see it in a crash test condition :'(
techndeck 8 months ago
@ArticMuse that is the european version, american ford rangers never had a whole crew cab.
DevosHeineken 9 months ago
@ArticMuse That Ranger was never developed or sold in America.
DetroitBORG 9 months ago
that car is available in the Philippines im gonna tell my dad not to buy that truck!
haroldvideos 9 months ago
@ArticMuse Cars are build to smash now a days they say its safer..
PCDTPRODUCTION 9 months ago
OMG! THE FRONT WHEEL O_O.... IF IT WOULD CRAH IN A LORRY EVERYONE INSIDE WOULD DIE :))
dragoscorca 10 months ago
@ArticMuse because the Ranger is the worst truck of ford!
look at the F-150 or the Taurus
are very stronge
Xtwqedfaghyuinm 10 months ago
@Xtwqedfaghyuinm
It's better in new model
I believe.
streesmut70 10 months ago
american piece of shit....looks like bus...:Dbut only look:D:D.
noexist100 10 months ago
is this made in china?
hyuque 11 months ago
@ArticMuse Because the looks of American cars is the only reason to buy one... :P
JensDhondtVEVO 11 months ago
This is NOT the same Ranger sold in the US and Canada, it is the one sold in Mexico, Europe, and Asia. Its a totally different truck, built on a completely different platform, not even the engines are the same.
BadHaddy 11 months ago
@BadHaddy Seriously doubt this one was actually sold as such in Europe. Euro NCAP has the strictest safety tests of all and this would not get on the road here. Which may explain why I have never ever seen one of them anywhere in Europe I have been.
Efteling4Ever 2 months ago
that aint a ranger!
thats the shitty ass nissan
joey62978 1 year ago
@joey62978 You're wrong, it's made by mazda, but american product are shit too...
SebNormandy 11 months ago
@joey62978 0:44 Yeah, right....
americans suck big dick, no offence, but my uncle thought the same until he got an OPEL, a Toyota, a Mitsubishi, he liked the Mitsubishi & the Toyota the most, but all three were much better than the americans he owned.
ballader1 11 months ago
I wanted one of these things.....luckily i decided to wait for the all new aussie 2012 model......going to see a crash test on that baby before i think of purchasing one......check out the Geely its a chines peice of poo and does a far better job.....come on FORD/MAZDA lift your game and get those thai's to build better utes
vCwCorpSe 1 year ago
Fuck Car !!!
zxxaxxz1 1 year ago
Its a chinese built????
josemanuel599 1 year ago
piece of sh...
fcastellanos1 1 year ago
omg. the whole plastic
Ghostwarrior469 1 year ago
@Cycleian No they don't. Ford did not own Mazda when Mazda designed this particular vehicle, they bought part of Mazda afterwards. And Ford have since sold their share in Mazda. And Ford do not design all of Mazda's vehicles. Do some research before you make bold statements. Don't make statements on something you obviously have limited knowledge on.
cortinamatt 1 year ago
safer 2 walk!
AmazingAaron98 1 year ago
made in foreig country member??
TheGiggity999 1 year ago
yea you know you own a real truck when your chassis bends at a 30mph collision. pathetic
WislaKrakow24 1 year ago
i think im gonna get a new car.....
MeowChicken123 1 year ago
This European Ranger is a Mazda badged as a Ford. The North American Ranger is a Ford design and performs much better in the offset 40mph test even though it is a much older design dating back to 1983. I don't understand why they didn't just sell the much tougher North American Ranger in Europe instead of this junk. I have lived in both of these parts of the world and owned both examples of Ranger so I have experience to base my opinion on.
cortinamatt 1 year ago
@cortinamatt
I always thought the Mazda B series and the American Ranger were the same, as the ford Escape and Mazda tribute are the same. And the ranger shown here is the Brazilian version (bad manufactured). . Chek out the Ford EcoSport made in Brazil, just a piece of shiet.
harmankardonbose 1 year ago
@harmankardonbose Yeah the B series sold in North America is the same as the North American Ranger. It is a Ford design. The Mazda pickup sold in Europe though is a completely different vehicle which the European Ranger is based on and they're a Mazda design.
cortinamatt 1 year ago
omg it's better if it crumples like that. duh.
MrHeadlessmusician 1 year ago
illusion of safety...
Pseudofedrina 1 year ago
I see, there nothing german...
rachmaninow4 1 year ago
If this thing crumbles liex paper, then the older models must be a grain of sand
XxPcHeroxX 1 year ago
My dad has one of these for his work vehicle
AmazingAaron98 1 year ago
Mitsubishi L200 - the best pick-up tested at EuroNCap
Nissan Navara - the worst pick-up tested at EuroNCap
ropoly 1 year ago
Mitsubishi L200 - the best pick-up tested at EuroNCap
ropoly 1 year ago
64 kmh is equal to 40 miles and as that it is crashing into a concret slab, the forces transmitted are equivilant to the same car travelling at 55 kmh and hitting the car with half the crumple zone. Pickups have notorioulsy always been bad at crash tests with a 5 star safety pickup being achieved only recently.
jim30775 1 year ago
The frontal impacts musn't be like this, why not use the vehicle in the side impacts? Most cars never hit the wall hard, the wall just breaks duh.
Nytherr 1 year ago
BUILT FORD TOUGH ･･･
q238ryio0 1 year ago
WHAT!? Thats laughable, 4x4's stopped crumpling like this 12 years ago! Every other manufacturer at least got 4 or 5 stars in 2008, trust it to be FORD! Lol
1ns4ne1d10t 1 year ago
tis one was bild in thailand or arround there....
anarquistarenovado 1 year ago
ford just loke shit..i buy toyota
antakyusilo 1 year ago
ha ha, FORDS SUCK ASS!!!!!!!! Buy a Tacoma!
Motorfordtoyota 1 year ago
Ha..ha..ha... SteveO199150, you're right!!!
Relvolver73 1 year ago
if anyone thinks that this is an unsafe truck, you are an idiot. this got 3 stars at 40 mph, which is higher than the average speed in crashes.
SimHarrison 1 year ago
@JSoto96 it's not a deathtrap, it got 3 stars.
SimHarrison 1 year ago
Comment removed
phantazzmo 1 year ago
haha ford freakin sucks! i feel bad for anybody whos buys this truck.
DK384 1 year ago
@DK384 but it got 3 stars
SimHarrison 1 year ago
@DK384 thats not an american ford. you can't get a 4 door ranger like that in the usa
DizzyMan24 1 year ago
The current gen courier/ranger is over 10 years old now : /
hiace24 1 year ago
did i just saw the chassis snap?
brye18 1 year ago 15
@brye18 yes lol.I don't wanna be in that car in a crash.
moijesuismoi99 10 months ago
@brye18 good eyes, i think it was the tail shaft.
720rodney 10 months ago
@brye18 its see u fool :P
MrBrianokeeffe 7 months ago
i crashed today in a ford ranger 2005
ghostrider29992 1 year ago
the worst pickup ever!
nikooliver1 1 year ago
@nikooliver1 OMG!!! it got 3 STARS. it is a very good pickup
SimHarrison 1 year ago
Ford Build tough!!
really?
Athrunwong 1 year ago
@Athrunwong YES
SimHarrison 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
that why we dont have these cars in US
jorgeykami 1 year ago
bad car i think
saifaldeen2005 1 year ago
the ero Ranger ia really a Mazda old school with Mazda frame and body, not the US Ranger that you see in the states. the new 2010 ranger sold in asia and the Australia and the euro is now the same as the USA Ranger.
nvboy2000 1 year ago
Big bold heavy and stupid , but when they get a real blow they crumble
souds american!
ah just joking :)
215alessio 1 year ago
Wow, the European Ranger looks terribly unsafe. And VERY ugly.
karkraz 1 year ago
HAHA, Americans think their big SUVs are "safe." The chassis on that piece of junk seems to be made out of tin foil. For a giant car like that, I would expect it to be built like a rock. @ 60mph, you don't even see a dent on a German car doors. Hopefully we can shape up our shit and start to compete with the world before Hyundai starts releasing more $20,000 sports cars. Did you know that 50% of the cost of every American car goes to someone's pension?
BarackHOsama 1 year ago
The Ranger is sold on more continents in this world than the whole F series range combined.You forget, ANY vehicle that has a ladder chassis is prone to suffer from POOR crash test results.If you EVER watched ANY form of top level car racing, you will see that the vehicles dissipate on impact to SAVE THE DRIVER!..old school like the trucks,can handle huge impacts and suffing minimal damage BUT, the stored energy has to be removed somehow and guess who is next inline...YOU..
TREVILZE 1 year ago
@TREVILZE I don't know what kind of bullshit racing cars your looking at. I'm more interested in the "real" racing cars at Le Mans and Formula F1 where they crash at 200mph, replace the front end in 20 minutes, and continue for another 14 hours. Those bullshit NASCAR stock cars are garbage and were only designed to turn in one direction for each race.
BarackHOsama 1 year ago
@BarackHOsama Next time watch on F1 what happens when they hit a barrier and if you have ever bothered to watch the making of an F1 car you would have known the car is desgined to break up on impact, wheels first...etc....I have NEVER seen in F1 or Le Man's a race car hit a barrier at 200mph and survive for a front end rebuild...LOL..Next time search for energy dissipation and understand how it impacts on car design...even race cars.
TREVILZE 1 year ago
@TREVILZE So there are no crashes at 200mph? I have seen a LOT of crashes where the cars were doing ~200mph. Obviously a head on crash would be fatal, but they are also equipped with high end brakes and skilled drivers that are able to swerve and lessen the impact. Do you really think all their crashes are only at 40mph like this video? And YES, there are parts which crush on impact, but they are easily replaceable. The tub remains unscathed. If the whole car crumbles on impact ppl will die!
BarackHOsama 1 year ago
OMG !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
tameraast 1 year ago
@ArticMuse it's rarly that i see this car on the road here , compared to F150 this is a crap and only crap , maybe it's a model produced in Europe or somewhere else ,
youssefqazwsx 1 year ago
DAMN! I'm a Ford fan, but shit! This is like watching a chinese car crash! C'MON FORD! >:O
Ethanerkul 1 year ago 7
ive got a 96 bronco lifted with 37's and i wrecked it head on and the only thing i came out with was a bent bumper and bend on the drivers side of front axle lol the whole frame and body didnt collapse on impact! haha didnt even crack a headlight
wysackyjr 1 year ago
@ArticMuse cause if a car would be made in 2 inch steel, the force on the driver would kill him on the hit. when it deform, it absorb a lot of energy....
mat967 1 year ago
good to know, but i wonder is this truck really focus on being used on the road or off road? impact at 64km/h on dirt road is just plain suicidal while using it on the road, there is a good chance if it going to hit something, it will hit a small cars where the truck still fare better according to the law of physic
wyunaboy 1 year ago
where are the side airbags? @ 0:47 there arnt any? on the ford website the ranger has side airbags?
jaffacake1578 1 year ago
now lets watch the resale plummet for this scrapper :D
aaronchungrulez 1 year ago
guys dont comment badly on this until you see the nissan navara crah test with only half a star for crash protection in 2008! a rover 100 from years back was better than it!
jaffacake1578 1 year ago
@jaffacake1578 the navara has 2 ratings now ..... this crash test is very bad..
JohnnyEdwards20 1 year ago
this is the "global" version of the Ranger the rest of the world knows. Ford never used it in the US for this very reason, it wouldnt meet US saftey standards.
people in other countries think we live in the stone age cause some of our vehicles are outdated because even some brand new vehicles are very old designs. but they dont realize that there are good reasons we dont use the "global" models.
Kenruckyheadhunter 1 year ago
:((
bogdan9875 2 years ago
never seen a 4 door ranger in america i gaurantee the 2 door is much stronger
Sojaofdapepo 2 years ago 2
=) my ford ranger supercab 1988 2.3l is the shiT ! mint condition in / out :! proud of it
xxfroobxx 1 year ago
óóóh
trolejbusman 2 years ago
I have seen cars from the 70s survive better than that, guess this is Fords idea of a good truck for the Euro market, my dad had an Isuzu (which is Chevrolet underneath) cope much better
04Wenban 2 years ago
@04Wenban People don't buy American cars for their reliability, plain and simple. On an episode of Top Gear, Clarkson takes a 30 year old Toyota pickup, rams it several times into trees, drops it from cranes, submerges it in water overnight, and a host of other things, and it still worked! It required to be set on fire for it to finally stop working.
BarackHOsama 1 year ago
@BarackHOsama I meant in a crash a 70s car would survive better than that pick up
04Wenban 1 year ago
This is not a Ranger
shady4life420 2 years ago
This is not the american version of the Ranger, because the Americna version doesn't twist like this in a offset crash. This is some shitty Euro version of the Ranger.
SteelCity1981 2 years ago
it wouldnt be good if it was crashed aganist a hummer or a heavier one
benkimimyaa 2 years ago
Thats not a Ford Ranger!!
ibold1000 2 years ago
it is!!! euro version, the preatiest!!
EscarepioSenior 2 years ago
Looks good but not safe and made by Chinese
ibold1000 2 years ago
@ibold1000 made in Thailand.
chiefop 1 year ago
@chiefop Oh well you get the picture. The American made ones are a lot tougher!
ibold1000 1 year ago
haha shitty american car
hahahahaha
crazyeddie732 2 years ago
Its not shitty its just that its for third world what country do u live?
driftboy23 2 years ago
Ford....i never knew it was this fragile....
Athrunwong 2 years ago 2
well.... at least the wipers still work
SteveO199150 2 years ago 24
@SteveO199150
Of course they would work, it's an vital safety equipment that can save your life. Ford obviously spared no expensive when it comes to durability and safety.
JimmyUnlimit3d 1 year ago
holy shit thats only at 64 kmh.... thats like 30 miles an hour thats slow and it crumbles to shit like that?
jamesthegreat16 2 years ago 30
@jamesthegreat16 40mph
whattheheck1000 1 year ago
@jamesthegreat16 64km is the same speed test as the iihs's 40mph test
1mile=1.6km
warset 1 year ago
@jamesthegreat16 Actually, it's 40mph. But bad none the less.
streetstream 1 year ago
@jamesthegreat16 about 40 MPH
04smallmj 1 year ago
@jamesthegreat16 it's 40 mph and it got 3 stars, it's not bad.
SimHarrison 1 year ago
@jamesthegreat16 its 40mph, but yes i agree still very bad result!
indianmunda16 1 year ago
@jamesthegreat16 64k is 40mph buddy, but ya its a piece
corbsvt 1 year ago
low model of ford ranger
k3nt011 2 years ago
If you review the test results over at NCAP, the survival rate (at least not without horrific injuries to legs) is quite slim. It didn't even score three stars.
Someone said that smaller cars get totalled and this type of car only requires a new bumper.
A crash is all about energy dissipation. Crumpling is by design. As long as the internal cage remains intact, I rather be in a small car with crumple zones than a big one that channels all the forces involved into the passengers...
praevius 2 years ago 2
this results are like cars of 20 years ago
harmankardonbose 2 years ago
any of you ever see what happens when a little honda civic, or toyota or some thing rear ends a real american made truck . the truck drives off and gets a new bumber the car is totaled
Berriekins12 2 years ago
shameful..
mastermindsro 2 years ago
UShole quality!!
whitekarma8 2 years ago 2
Big heavy and stu...!
HaHa Ha
215alessio 2 years ago
Wow...this shows how much Ford cares about their consumers to even put their name on this death trap piece of shit...
I guess their mentality is that people in foreign countries don't deserve the same safety standards that we demand in the U.S.
fieryphoenixg1 2 years ago
Pick up trucks in America dont have to be crash tested btw, because they are commercial vehicles. You will find that in a crash test they will crumple like a coke can!
craigybus1 2 years ago
Yes they do
evinrudeboy6601 2 years ago
that baby ate shit too
jorgeykami 2 years ago
Thats not the Ranger made in the US.
lilshane93 2 years ago 2
@lilshane93 Thrue. American is more danger !
ustikamerou 2 years ago
Exactly, I thought this is a rebadged Mazda BT50
ansettnz100 2 years ago
Comment removed
RGMerkel 2 years ago
that isnt an usa ute mate its a jap built by mazda for ford
playmate7891 2 years ago
yes
741852963a 2 years ago
wtf?!
a crew cab
4 door ranger?!
hahaha
never seen one before...
I own a 01 ranger edge access cab.
Greetings from California.
jesseyeahdude 2 years ago
god some american built cars are shit!!! :)
andyiscoolie 2 years ago
wow, how bad american shit....
BishopDonPeter 2 years ago
my god you're dumb. it's made in Thailand. if it was made in America then we would have the same truck. our Ranger is completely different.
stopscrewingaround11 2 years ago 2
Yeah right, it still shit Mo'fucka fuck you you talkin' bout some it was made in thailand yo momma was made in thailand bitch
BishopDonPeter 2 years ago
.............. :l
stopscrewingaround11 2 years ago
WOW, how adult of you to resort to childish insults. You can not be more then 15 at most with that mantality!
RGMerkel 2 years ago
douche bag
Sk8FalIen 2 years ago
Correct.
Their are many different versions of the Ranger made in different parts of the world. The Thai versions are not that reliable from what I've read. The U.S versions are built MUCH MUCH better and run a lot longer.
RGMerkel 2 years ago
Well, at least its a good form of population control.
sreif78 2 years ago 2
FORD SUCKKKKKSSSSSSSS!!!!!! For trucks its all about Dodge.
MPLSTORM 2 years ago
Damn, this is really bad,
iMarv 2 years ago