Its time Russia Join in, as it should have years before to solve the taliban and related terrorist crisis. I fully admit that russia still is a major player in the world and commands great authority in asia. And I being an Indian am saying this! Lets saturate afganistan and pakistan! India would soon join the war! It has alredy pledged 4 million paras!
@srheadshot1 well that's why it's called a Cold war! A warm war is active warfare between two parties and it's cold when neither of the two parties meet in direct war against each other. In this case the US didn't fight an open war against the USSR but they fought each other in different areas and in different departments. And yes the west did win over the USSR during the cold war since we are still here and you are not!
@DeathSetler no, you couldn't have been more wrong...... most Europeans don't hate american's... And FYI I am a ethnic European and not an American....
@dima93sevsk I personally don't like it. It looks like a bug with one long ass horn that doesn't match it's body being ready to be squished by an M1. I still think it's your opinion though, that was mine.
I want to join the Infantry, but at the same time to be an M1 crewman. The time I probably do become a M1 crewmember the M1A3 will be in its prototype stages. I dont know which one to choose :I
oh you mean to ratio of how many people are there. yeah i can see that. but there have 200000 troops in the last decade, not 50000 So if you do that, that means 2% of all troops have suffered, NOT DEATHS, casualties. thank you for making my point MORE clear.
You should remember the wounded and injured, of whitch there are tens of thousands. Sure, they survived, but how fun it is to lose a leg, or get shot and spend half a year in painfull reovery, or loose much of the arm movement, etc.
Music at the beginning is from Transformers. The M1A2 Abrams is featured in Transformers 2 ROTF when US Army units fight the Decepticons alongside the Autobots.
This is the best protected tank in the world. Often the Leopard 2 A6 is ranked as highest because it is cheaper in price and costs to operate but in many of those tankings the Abrams is ranked 1 when they look purely at combat performance.
Its planned to remain in service till 2050! M1A3 under development.
@NationalSniper: The Leopard 2A6 is ranked at the Best Tank because low operate cost, the tank basically is more expensive then the Abrams. The Leopard 2A5 is also newer ( 1995 ) than the M1A2 ( 1992 ) which got since 1992 just the Electronic's Upgrade ( SEP ) The M1A2 SEP has better electronics than the Leo 2, better ammunition & better KE Armor in the Front. The TUSK got the same Mine Protection than Leopard 2A6M. Visit my Channel Background for the M1E3 ( Prototype )
Australia, USA, Ägypt, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia use the M1 too.
The Leopard 2A6 has better Mine Protection?! The Leopard 2A6M has the same like the M1A2 TUSK. The Diesel Abrams can dive under water too, and need less fuel. 99% Hit Chance? u need a good Gunner if u want to hit something. The Leclerc has a better FCS and guarantee a 95%+ hit chance
It was clearly listed as the best MBT? Maybe one of the best.
The Abrams killed an Tank up to 8000m with his L/44
u measured the Armor? Its basically wrong. That are estimations from the Internet. i believe the Leopard has just one Point with better Armor than the M1A2.
The Front Turret against HEAT. The Armor of the Leopard 2A6 is the same like from the A4 > 1985. With A5 & A6 he just got an new wedge armor & a longer Gun. M1A3 > Leopard 2A7+
hey fellas, stop arguing, modern tank2tank battles are settled in the sphere of information exchange and control over units. one who sees the enemy tank first wins. most western tanks have same electronics and C2 systems. russian ones dont, i mean u can upgrade them though...another minus of russian T-series tanks is their autoloader, witch limits the size of the APFSDS rounds. and u must know that length to diameter ratio of the penetrator rod is what counts the most.
@TankNutJohn89 Leopard was clearly listed as the best MBT in the world today ;) He is the ONLY tank which can destroy an other Tank too 100% with the first shot up to 3500meters even if he or its targed is moving. (L/55 gun) Armor of the Leopard vs KE ammo is 940mm and a 3rd generation Armor. Leopard2A6 Turret: 920-940mm Glacis: 620mm M1A2 Turret: 880-900 mm Glacis:560-590mm
It was clearly listed as the best MBT? Maybe one of the best.
The Abrams killed an Tank up to 8000m with his L/44
u measured the Armor? Its basically wrong. That are estimations from the Internet. i believe the Leopard has just one Point with better Armor than the M1A2.
The Front Turret against HEAT. The Armor of the Leopard 2A6 is the same like from the A4 > 1985. With A5 & A6 he just got an new wedge armor & a longer Gun. M1A3 > Leopard 2A7+
If you think so xD Why do other Nations chose the Leopard over the Abrams? ^^
8000m what tank was that? a Sherman? or a cupboard tank? Maybe you shouldn't read that much Tom Clancy. Or if you are so good why does your Abrams using a gun from Rheinmetall? The Leopard 2A6 has a better range then the Abrams and as i wrote, is he the only Tank with a 100% one hit chance.
But why i am talking with a typical patriot ^^ who only has one word in his head USA USA USA........
@JazzJaRa: The most Nations buys older Leopard 2s for very low prices.
They dont need the best Tank, they need a cheap, reliable, good european tank, the Leopard. The 8000m Kill was a driving iraqi T-72A, i dont read Tom Clancy.
To develope a new tank Gun, can need years, ( ex: L/44 = over 10 Years )
its very expensive , so why dont buy an good Gun for not the half a price?
And no, the Leopard is not the only tank with a 95% hit chance.
an international company test best tanks, Leo was 4. M1-1
No Canada , Netherland , Denmark , Greek , Portugal , sweden , spain all of these have the Leopard 2A6 and compared it with other western tanks also the M1A2. If you want to know some truth about the Leopard look at the video "watch?v=8DtNkP8YDg0&feature=related" The Leopard is better in so many ways. Better Mineprotection, less fuel waste and something pretty cool, it can drive under water. Higer range and more firepower. And yes he is the only tank with a 99% hit chance.
@JazzJaRa: Yes. And now look on the older Versions.
Australia, USA, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia use the Abrams.
The Leopard has better Mine Protection? The Leopard 2A6 have the same Mine Protection like the M1A2. None, the Leopard 2A6M have the same like the M1A2 with TUSK. The Diesel Abrams can dive into Water too and waste less fuel than the Gas Turbine. Higher Range? More Firepower?!
The Leclerc has a better Fire Control, if u have a good Gunner u hit 100%
Saudi Arabia wanted the Leopard 2A6 too but our Gouverment didn't want to give the tank to a possilbe enemy of Israel no idea why but however. The Leopard 2A6 maybe but the 2A6M has a different. The main group of Abrams tank is still using the Gas Turbine which isn't really good for the sand regions too. Leopard 2A6 uses the L55 gun which has a better range and accuracy then the L44 (why should they create worser guns?)
@JazzJaRa its not creating worser guns its just creating new guns. the abrams doesnt really need an L55 since its computers can make the L44 work at its best
The Abrams can't use the L55 either, because the turret can't handle it.
Well the Combat XP isn't that much. They fought against Enemy Tanks (Export versions) with no night or thermo vision and no laser range finder, also the Iraq just had poorly trained crews who get a crash course on the tank and went into battle with their T-55 , T-64 and a few T-72 exports without upgrated armor and the things i mentioned before.
@JazzJaRa all of americas enemies use crap tanks. it doesnt need to use the L55. and i think if it did it might not be able to turn its turret a full 360 degrees while at full speed
I don't think that Russia and China/Korea use crap Tanks. And they export their Tanks also to many other countrys, maybe as export versions but still. The L55 would give the Abrams a longer range and better accuracy. The Leopard 2A6 (the one with L55) can turn its turret full 360° also at full speed so why shouldn't the Abrams not? The only reason he doesn't use it, is because the turret isn't designed for it.
@JazzJaRa if it was all the abrams built in the world, that would equal 9000+ super computers headed your way. if it uses L55 it would be great. but the computers do the work for man. in both tanks they use computers to calculate the shots. but the abrams just has the computers and numbers
@JazzJaRa the small countries ( and yes canada too because most of its population lives 100 miles from the border) uses it mostly because they need a good tank that can go across their country easily to support their troops. the abrams is more of a tank that can be an excellent tank. but since it has a low range it can just hold its ground and kill as many as it can, go back to base and do the same thing
I don't say the Abrams is bad, i like it but the fact that it is still the best is wrong. It might be as good as the Leopard but isn't the best. I think this video might explain everythin better. watch?v=z09Bf7I9UTQ&feature=related
@JazzJaRa most of those nations are small nations that a leo 2 can go accross in one feul tank pretty quickly. and they dont need to be used in numbers because of their quality. the abrams has high quality too but its also a tank used with numbers. it has more combat xp to
@SilentEagles Tiger Tank was and still is quite a marvel to behold. but there is no way it can compete with an Abrams. Abrams is 3 times faster, it weighs tons more, it is underpowered compared to the Abrams and The gun is only 88 mil whereas the Abrams is 105. Not to mention all the other things that are better, but i wouldnt have the room so we'll leave it at that. Tiger is a fighter but the Abrams is unbeatable, the only threat i see for an Abrams is that new Leopard tank.
@SuperPandawan yeah yeah i know. as soon as i made that message i read it and said "shit someone's gonna call me on that"!!!! for some reason i was thinking of a firefly
@SilentEagles The Germany use the Leopard 2 it's the other tank from the M1 project that was worked on by both Germany and USA, there tank and the US m1 are from the same project.
LATEST NEWS FROM IRAQ (classified) : from the recent report Iraqi liberation Army has cornered american occupant on Iraqi territory causing enormous casualty (destroyed technical) and captured soldiers,american POW are well treated (new protocol),after a month they will be released-unharmed,in boots and underwear and with food for 2 days ( well balanced diet ) each POW must be supplied (mandatory) with pamphlet "touristic beauty of Iraq".
Diesels are louder, larger, and more mechanically complex, but more fuel efficient and not as big a heat signature. Gas-turbines are smaller (much higher power-to-weight ratio), quieter, mechanically more simple, but put out a lot of heat and are fuel hogs.
That is why they aren't used in tractor trailer trucks, because at idle they consume lots of fuel.
So it's really which trade-offs a military prefers. The U.S. military prefers the gas-turbine, most other countries, a diesel.
I think American designers should stop pretending they know best, and listen more to the people who actually use tanks in real-world battles. For example, Israelis. With healthy exchange of ideas, both can benefit greatly...
The Abrams isnt based on the Leopard. The mbt 70 doesnt resemble the abrams one bit. Where do you guy get your info from? The germans and americans went thier separate was with design except for the main gun. And for the record the 120mm uses a german guntube and an american breech. It isnt just german.
It's not based on a Leopard two and it doesn't use british armor. It is possible for two countries to make the same thing, moron. It's quite obvious how much you know about tanks. Delete your life.
Actually the M1A1/2 uses British Chubham Armour... And also uses a German Canon... And it also is a tank who was builded out of a American and German Project. So yes, the Abrams has influences of a Leopard, clueless idiot.
And i guess i should delete my life because i'm not such a stupid patritism fucktard like you. It makes sense, haha.
No you dumbass, we use armor based on the British design. We've also incorporated depleted uranium into our armor, which the British have not. So how can it be the same? Yes, it uses a 120mm main gun made by Reinmetal. Who cares? That does not make it based on the Leopard 2. The United States and Germany were working to make a MBT but each decided to go and make their own. We didn't base ours off theirs. What does knowing about tanks have to do with patriotism? Douche bag.
Of cours the Abrams has Influences of an Leopard you american fucktard!!!!!!!!!!!! >:I
I know why most of the world population hates you stupid bastards! :P You know a shit about tanks or anything else you fat burger cunt! If you would know something about it you would'nt post bullshit like you do!
Uh, i have to support Countach...But dude, not every American is a fat idiot.. I guess every country has it's "Idiots"..
But...
The Abrams really is based on an Leopard... The first Prototype of the Leopard was modificated, and designed... and the result was the Arbams. It's also right, that germany and america wanted to create the "Kampfpanzer 70" (Is it called like this) Simple as it is, it's true...
And now both of you, shut the fuck up. Our countrys rocks, Out!
The M1A2, T-90, Challenger and Leapord are by far the greatest tanks evr but nothing beats the US and Russian designs are the better of the current generation
Someone please tell me what is the music played inbetween the first music (from "Transformers") and the very end music (from "Pirates of the Carribean")!
Even if you destroyed 2 M1 abrams for everyone of your tanks, there would still be thousands more m1 abrams for you to take out. By that time most of your tanks would be taken out by American Airsupport. :P
as long as we can defeat the Ruskies I dont care which tank is better, we need to work together to defeat the Ruskies and the Chicoms and the ragheads. Cheers
I feel sorry for any nation that allows the terrorists to get any hands on nukes. If the terrorists get any nukes from N. Korea or Pakistan and the terrorists use them on ANY nation, that nation that supplied them will be gone. That has been our policy with nukes. You use nukes you will die with nukes.
Hahahahaa! You really made me laugh with this one. Who are you, Sigmund fucking Freud? You are the one that's talking about the world destruction, not me... So who has the death wish?
world destruction doesn't necessarily mean anyone has to die. I could just want all types government to crumble. you are the one with your first name and the word gun next to it. Stivi + gun to forehead = An Hero.
The ICBMs won't just crumble the governments... A nuclear holocaust would leave behind a planet only inhabited by bugs & other creatures that immune to nuclear radiations. So what the fuck are you talking about?
U need a proof for that..? What, u actually think YOU would survive? Then u must be crazier than I thought.The only ones that would survive would be the bugs & those that have specially built nuclear bunkers. Meaning, exactly the ones that you would like to see crumbling... So what would your nuclear war would solve after all?
If you actually need a proof that a nuclear war would simply leave a planet that can't be inhabited by humans, then you don't even have the smallest general knowledge abt anything... I guess this would explain your statements abt ICBMs... Or is it possible that u r so stupid 2 actually believe that only u could destroy other countries with nuclear weapons & that yr geographical location would spare from the effects...? It's hard 2 believe that u can be that stupid...
You are a dumb troll. I know a lot about ICBMs nuclear fall out and so on and so forth. You on the other hand seem to believe everything that the government puts out. I have yet to see a link so GTFO BITCH!
You can search alone on the net, moron! I'm not gona bother giving you links about something that has become 2 be common sense and even a 5 year old kid would know! So GO FUCK YOUR SELF BITCH!
@TheNexTechnoViking It would be possible for that to happen yet highly unlikley. By what I know that would require the US and Russia to utilize the majority of their nuclear stockpiles and do so to where vast radiation poisioning would be spread evenly
@StiviGun1 It would be possible for that to happen yet highly unlikley. By what I know that would require the US and Russia to utilize the majority of their nuclear stockpiles and do so to where vast radiation poisioning would be spread evenly
& what do u think the Americans & the Russians would do in case a nuclear war brakes out? Use only a quarter of their nuclear arsenals? Or half? They would use everything they have. The nuclear radiations would leave almost nothing behind. Almost all the creatures would disappear. Except from bugs, rats or other radiations resistant creatures. Human life would disappear. Well, except maybe 4 those that have special bunkers. Namely, few politicians.
@StiviGun1 Actually the MAD cocept would possibly prevent nuclear war all together but puch come to shove and worst case scenario the 2 nations would only hit strategic points such as capitals military infastructure factories that produce weapons and platforms. Use only what is necassary.
Even if they do what u say, a nuclear war would still leave behind a world that would be almost impossible 2 live in. The radioactive fallout would have devastating & irreversible consequences, not only on human beings, but also on the entire flora & fauna of the Earth. Our atmosphere is already fucked up by all sorts of radiations & polluting substances. So a nuclear war would leave us completely defenseless against all the ultraviolet & other emissions from the sun. It would become impossible
2 walk out in the open during the daylight AT LEAST. The irreversible effects on the atmosphere would lead 2 radioactive rains & storms & hurricanes that otherwise wouldn't happen. A nuclear war would destabilize the entire cycle of how things work on planet Earth. A nuclear war, be a total 1 or just a war where only strategic points would be targeted, would leave behind a planet that would be almost impossible 2 live on. At least 4 the humans.
@UltimateGohan2008 Yeah, that's unlikely 'cause no one would want to destroy the planet. No one would want to start a war that would live behing an uninhabitable planet.
Those Abrahams are worthless. They use to much fuel, and they are not reliable. Who build a fucking gasturbine engine in a tank: The US. In short: The're real American shit. The Leopard 2A6 is far more reliable, is better Armoured, en uses less fuel, because is has an 12-cilinder, 47 litre, turbocharged diesel-engine with 1500 HP. Nothing beats German engineering!
Hahahaha!!!! What makes you think you're qualified to make those statements? The M1 series tanks are the most powerful tanks in the world. Who cares that we didn't go diesel? We wanted more power, therefore, we have the gas turbine engine. We may not get great gas mileage but we still have a cruising range of 440km. The Leopard is NOT better armored. They still have not put depleted uranium in their armor, or their rounds. Therefore, they will continue to fall short of the Abrams.
Hey Catchaspoon, You know dog shit about tanks either. You wrote: 'We wanted more power'. Well, guess what: The Leopard has the same amount of power as the Abrahams: 1500 HP. And about their armour: The Leopard doesn't need that low-radioactive shit, because its armour is strong enough without it! And that goes also for its rounds. So it don't fall short, kid.
Because horse power is the only thing that comes into play with an engine....Well it's obvious what intelligence level I'm dealing with here. As far as the armor goes, they will get their shit ruined when they are trying to close 2,000m to get in range when they have DU sabots coming their way. They may have "strong" armor. But at the end of the day, it won't hold up against a DU Sabot round. The denser metal always wins....
Well, it's indeed obvious what intelligence level I'am dealing with: Brainless and not able to communicate with people in a normal way. You're an arrogant motherfucker. I don't hate America. I just don't like people like you: So, keep on jerking your self off at your Abrahams "tank", fucker. Meanwhile, I will go on looking at REAL tanks. Have a nice fucking day, dickhead.
And I'm just talking about the M1A1. If you want to talk 4 M1A2 SEPs, Fucking forget about it. With the ability to lock onto multiple targets at once and cycle through and automatically lock onto new targets once the old ones are destroyed. It's a much more combat efficient tank. Judging by your comments on other videos. You're just another toolbox that hates America and looks for any reason to shit out of your mouth.
its weaker and yet less armourd than the abrams, but more faster. I looked it up, just wanted to say that so this argument can be done with and we can peacefully watch this video
I agree with you on the armor, but not on the rounds. The DU cored rounds are the most powerful penetrators. Nothing beats them. Also, I don't think there is any other tank that is better protected than the Abrams. The Leopard II is a very well protected tank, but I don't think is better protected than the Abrams, at least from the frontal side.
@Catchaspoon sorry but abrams is to expensive and the massproduction rate is so low you know
i woud go for the leopard 2
yes low massproduction also but if theire woud be a world war the first thing you at least take in acount is that its not to expensive to drive the damn thing
Point noted, however, who cares how fast we can produce them? We've been making them for 20 years, we already have way more Abrams then Germany has Leo's and we have the logistics to back it up. Our tanks and crews are combat tested, hardened, and proven. In a world war, we would win before it started, as a country the USA has way more industrial strength than Germany, we can make anything faster than they can and we have superiority in every war aspect you can think of. We've proven it, twice.
This is not WW2, things are very different now. For one, Germany has a restriction on the size of it's army. So it's already vastly outnumbered against America alone. Not counting all the other countries that would follow us into battle. Besides, these days, every tank is very expensive and complex to build. That's just the nature of the beast. We aren't spending much more than them.
Speaking of the Leopard "falling short" They have the same main gun, 120mm, and yet only half the max effective range, maybe a little over 2,000m. Max effective range of the M1A1, 4,000m. So I guess your shitty rounds wouldn't make a difference anyways. And don't even think about coming back with some shit about it being able to go under water and attacking L.A. Blah blah. They can go under about 12 feet of water, WITH a snorkal kit, the same as the Abrams. You know dog shit about tanks, kid.
Are you serious you moron? I know you didn't know this before, so do you want me to tell you the difference between the L44 and the L55? It's just over a yard longer and has an increased muzzle velocity. If anything, you helped me prove my point. It has a higher muzzle velocity and STILL at half the max effective range. Stop splitting hairs trying to look smart, it's still for all practical purposes, the same gun, it's a 120mm. They can fire our rounds, we can fire theirs. Fucking tool.....
Proud to have been on one, with the crew I had during the Gulf War.
Milkmanjerry 1 month ago
y dont they make a tank with an auto 50 mm cannon for u.s.
TheHardrock000 2 months ago in playlist Favorite videos
la puta no quiero ver quien concha presenta esta mierda
Simba2030 4 months ago
Feg I waited 1mint for a vid I saw somewhere eles with original music this is crap
PopTartzluver17 5 months ago
0:53
zppz 6 months ago
lol Saddam he thought he stood a chance against the USA and Euro Forces in the gulf war.
Dogmeat1950 6 months ago
@Dogmeat1950 lol now were is saddam lmfao hahahaha usa and our euro bros are taken ova
marcus502414 6 months ago
@marcus502414 Did not Saddam brag that Iraq is ready to fight "The Mother of all Battles"? And now where is Saddam now? dead, Dead, DEAD!
11B30Inf 5 months ago
@11B30Inf Saddam is really SAD, mother of all losers
alvincenthanoi 1 week ago
@Dogmeat1950 I served for the the 3rd Cav doing the Gulf War we went through them like shit through a goose.
Milkmanjerry 1 month ago
Song is clubbed to death. From the film, the matrix
60saxon 6 months ago
Yeah.clubbed to death. It's from The Matrix
60saxon 6 months ago
anyone know the name of this song?
The3rdINFANTRY 6 months ago
<3 u Europe got nothing on ya
Megan1234595 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Its time Russia Join in, as it should have years before to solve the taliban and related terrorist crisis. I fully admit that russia still is a major player in the world and commands great authority in asia. And I being an Indian am saying this! Lets saturate afganistan and pakistan! India would soon join the war! It has alredy pledged 4 million paras!
TheVasurocks 7 months ago
M1 ftw :)
FALCON131001 7 months ago
Name of song??
94ruthless 7 months ago
we dont won the cold war because that war wasn t happen
srheadshot1 9 months ago
@srheadshot1 well that's why it's called a Cold war! A warm war is active warfare between two parties and it's cold when neither of the two parties meet in direct war against each other. In this case the US didn't fight an open war against the USSR but they fought each other in different areas and in different departments. And yes the west did win over the USSR during the cold war since we are still here and you are not!
Khristophoros1001 8 months ago
@Khristophoros1001 the situation has changed, now Europeans hate Americans and it's time for u to leave from Europe GO home Yankee!
DeathSetler 7 months ago
@DeathSetler no, you couldn't have been more wrong...... most Europeans don't hate american's... And FYI I am a ethnic European and not an American....
Khristophoros1001 7 months ago
the america army is a trash russian army is better and more powerfull
srheadshot1 9 months ago
@srheadshot1 Silly Russian you guys couldnt even win a Cold War!!
berrywoke 9 months ago
@scassidy0526 no the beginning song
SpiderDroid2 9 months ago
whats the beginning song?
SpiderDroid2 9 months ago
whats the song?
SpiderDroid2 9 months ago
trop cool
mastrodont313 10 months ago
This is the tank all others are compared to.
kel12176 10 months ago
Russian T90 is more beautiful
dima93sevsk 10 months ago
@dima93sevsk I personally don't like it. It looks like a bug with one long ass horn that doesn't match it's body being ready to be squished by an M1. I still think it's your opinion though, that was mine.
Robloxsaltytaco1234 10 months ago
@dima93sevsk Beauty isn't a focus in weapons, functionallity is.
ballisstix 9 months ago
Whats that song called?
GameplayGPJL 11 months ago
number 1 i like it
joseesp33 11 months ago
M1? Don't you mean M1A1 or M1A2? I thought all M1s have been upgraded to at least M1A1 standard.
ASIANPRIDE50 11 months ago
I want to join the Infantry, but at the same time to be an M1 crewman. The time I probably do become a M1 crewmember the M1A3 will be in its prototype stages. I dont know which one to choose :I
Robloxsaltytaco1234 11 months ago
@Robloxsaltytaco1234 go tank or special forces. to be honest i wouldn't wanna be in American infantry just too many casualties
ironsaber2 11 months ago
@ironsaber2
yeah 5,000 in a decade. damn that's just SO much. note that was sarcasm
MuskratandRatman 10 months ago
@MuskratandRatman yeah when there are 50 000 troops in iraq there yeah that is alot
ironsaber2 10 months ago
@ironsaber2
oh you mean to ratio of how many people are there. yeah i can see that. but there have 200000 troops in the last decade, not 50000 So if you do that, that means 2% of all troops have suffered, NOT DEATHS, casualties. thank you for making my point MORE clear.
MuskratandRatman 10 months ago
@MuskratandRatman
You should remember the wounded and injured, of whitch there are tens of thousands. Sure, they survived, but how fun it is to lose a leg, or get shot and spend half a year in painfull reovery, or loose much of the arm movement, etc.
ArtypNk 10 months ago
Music at the beginning is from Transformers. The M1A2 Abrams is featured in Transformers 2 ROTF when US Army units fight the Decepticons alongside the Autobots.
This is the best protected tank in the world. Often the Leopard 2 A6 is ranked as highest because it is cheaper in price and costs to operate but in many of those tankings the Abrams is ranked 1 when they look purely at combat performance.
Its planned to remain in service till 2050! M1A3 under development.
NationalSniper 1 year ago
@NationalSniper: The Leopard 2A6 is ranked at the Best Tank because low operate cost, the tank basically is more expensive then the Abrams. The Leopard 2A5 is also newer ( 1995 ) than the M1A2 ( 1992 ) which got since 1992 just the Electronic's Upgrade ( SEP ) The M1A2 SEP has better electronics than the Leo 2, better ammunition & better KE Armor in the Front. The TUSK got the same Mine Protection than Leopard 2A6M. Visit my Channel Background for the M1E3 ( Prototype )
TankNutJohn89 11 months ago
why to copy someones video and copy over with your own music
SovietSammy 1 year ago
Abrams is like a cadilac,T-90 is like a sport car..
USMCjunior117 1 year ago
@USMCjunior117
T-90 has weak armor and weaker gun. Mobility is not bad. Both Abrams and Leopard 2 kill a T-90 at 4km but can survive their own rounds.
T-90 like a Lada, technologically crap and low tech but cheap to produce so you can build more of them for the same price.
NationalSniper 1 year ago
That sounds like exceptional information. But the T-90 is smaller so it has some advantages. It'll possibly see you first.
USMCjunior117 1 year ago
@NationalSniper And remember tanks do not die in one hit nowadays.
USMCjunior117 1 year ago
nice video!USA and France allied forever!
XxMiLlErAnGerxX 1 year ago
What is the name of the song in this vid?
N6674F 1 year ago
I'm still wondering where the walking tanks are.
junkers1337 1 year ago
in response to all the they should mount the L55 on the Abrams comments to my knowledge they did in the M1A2 version
archangle117 1 year ago
Australia, USA, Ägypt, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia use the M1 too.
The Leopard 2A6 has better Mine Protection?! The Leopard 2A6M has the same like the M1A2 TUSK. The Diesel Abrams can dive under water too, and need less fuel. 99% Hit Chance? u need a good Gunner if u want to hit something. The Leclerc has a better FCS and guarantee a 95%+ hit chance
TankNutJohn89 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@JazzJaRa: What are u dreaming at Night?
It was clearly listed as the best MBT? Maybe one of the best.
The Abrams killed an Tank up to 8000m with his L/44
u measured the Armor? Its basically wrong. That are estimations from the Internet. i believe the Leopard has just one Point with better Armor than the M1A2.
The Front Turret against HEAT. The Armor of the Leopard 2A6 is the same like from the A4 > 1985. With A5 & A6 he just got an new wedge armor & a longer Gun. M1A3 > Leopard 2A7+
TankNutJohn89 1 year ago
i usedto command 4 of these - punchin pervy muslim virgin fantasdy tickets like crazy
blumenthol 1 year ago
This is one of the best M1 videos I've seen on youtube 5/5
XzenXzaneXzix 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
In 2050, the United States armed forces are going to replace the M1 abrams design with a completely new design.
TheCatholic143 1 year ago
This tank can easily crush any tank in the middle east.
TheCatholic143 1 year ago
I'd touch that tanks cannon.
shades1ayer 1 year ago
hey fellas, stop arguing, modern tank2tank battles are settled in the sphere of information exchange and control over units. one who sees the enemy tank first wins. most western tanks have same electronics and C2 systems. russian ones dont, i mean u can upgrade them though...another minus of russian T-series tanks is their autoloader, witch limits the size of the APFSDS rounds. and u must know that length to diameter ratio of the penetrator rod is what counts the most.
tbilisicentral 1 year ago
The M1A2 Abrams is the best Main Battle Tank today.
- No other Tank have such a high Firepower ( 960mm RHA at 2km with M256 )
- Compared with the Leopard 2A6 ( 810mm RHA at 2km with L/55 )
- It has a very good front armor ( Chobham + Depleted Uranium )
- ( M1A2 Turret ( KE ) = 950mm / ( Leo 2A6 Turret ( KE ) = 930mm /
- The M1A2 has the same Hp/t Ratio like the Leopard 2A6
- The M1A2 has a lower High Speed ( 42 Mp/h ) but a faster accleration than Leo2
- The GT has no visible Exhaust anymore
TankNutJohn89 1 year ago
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa: What are u dreaming at Night?
It was clearly listed as the best MBT? Maybe one of the best.
The Abrams killed an Tank up to 8000m with his L/44
u measured the Armor? Its basically wrong. That are estimations from the Internet. i believe the Leopard has just one Point with better Armor than the M1A2.
The Front Turret against HEAT. The Armor of the Leopard 2A6 is the same like from the A4 > 1985. With A5 & A6 he just got an new wedge armor & a longer Gun. M1A3 > Leopard 2A7+
TankNutJohn89 1 year ago
@TankNutJohn89
If you think so xD Why do other Nations chose the Leopard over the Abrams? ^^
8000m what tank was that? a Sherman? or a cupboard tank? Maybe you shouldn't read that much Tom Clancy. Or if you are so good why does your Abrams using a gun from Rheinmetall? The Leopard 2A6 has a better range then the Abrams and as i wrote, is he the only Tank with a 100% one hit chance.
But why i am talking with a typical patriot ^^ who only has one word in his head USA USA USA........
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa: The most Nations buys older Leopard 2s for very low prices.
They dont need the best Tank, they need a cheap, reliable, good european tank, the Leopard. The 8000m Kill was a driving iraqi T-72A, i dont read Tom Clancy.
To develope a new tank Gun, can need years, ( ex: L/44 = over 10 Years )
its very expensive , so why dont buy an good Gun for not the half a price?
And no, the Leopard is not the only tank with a 95% hit chance.
an international company test best tanks, Leo was 4. M1-1
TankNutJohn89 1 year ago
@TankNutJohn89
No Canada , Netherland , Denmark , Greek , Portugal , sweden , spain all of these have the Leopard 2A6 and compared it with other western tanks also the M1A2. If you want to know some truth about the Leopard look at the video "watch?v=8DtNkP8YDg0&feature=related" The Leopard is better in so many ways. Better Mineprotection, less fuel waste and something pretty cool, it can drive under water. Higer range and more firepower. And yes he is the only tank with a 99% hit chance.
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa: Yes. And now look on the older Versions.
Australia, USA, Egypt, Iraq, Kuwait and Saudi Arabia use the Abrams.
The Leopard has better Mine Protection? The Leopard 2A6 have the same Mine Protection like the M1A2. None, the Leopard 2A6M have the same like the M1A2 with TUSK. The Diesel Abrams can dive into Water too and waste less fuel than the Gas Turbine. Higher Range? More Firepower?!
The Leclerc has a better Fire Control, if u have a good Gunner u hit 100%
TankNutJohn89 1 year ago
@TankNutJohn89
Saudi Arabia wanted the Leopard 2A6 too but our Gouverment didn't want to give the tank to a possilbe enemy of Israel no idea why but however. The Leopard 2A6 maybe but the 2A6M has a different. The main group of Abrams tank is still using the Gas Turbine which isn't really good for the sand regions too. Leopard 2A6 uses the L55 gun which has a better range and accuracy then the L44 (why should they create worser guns?)
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa its not creating worser guns its just creating new guns. the abrams doesnt really need an L55 since its computers can make the L44 work at its best
nunchuck19 1 year ago
@nunchuck19
The Abrams can't use the L55 either, because the turret can't handle it.
Well the Combat XP isn't that much. They fought against Enemy Tanks (Export versions) with no night or thermo vision and no laser range finder, also the Iraq just had poorly trained crews who get a crash course on the tank and went into battle with their T-55 , T-64 and a few T-72 exports without upgrated armor and the things i mentioned before.
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa all of americas enemies use crap tanks. it doesnt need to use the L55. and i think if it did it might not be able to turn its turret a full 360 degrees while at full speed
nunchuck19 1 year ago
@nunchuck19
I don't think that Russia and China/Korea use crap Tanks. And they export their Tanks also to many other countrys, maybe as export versions but still. The L55 would give the Abrams a longer range and better accuracy. The Leopard 2A6 (the one with L55) can turn its turret full 360° also at full speed so why shouldn't the Abrams not? The only reason he doesn't use it, is because the turret isn't designed for it.
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa if it was all the abrams built in the world, that would equal 9000+ super computers headed your way. if it uses L55 it would be great. but the computers do the work for man. in both tanks they use computers to calculate the shots. but the abrams just has the computers and numbers
nunchuck19 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa the small countries ( and yes canada too because most of its population lives 100 miles from the border) uses it mostly because they need a good tank that can go across their country easily to support their troops. the abrams is more of a tank that can be an excellent tank. but since it has a low range it can just hold its ground and kill as many as it can, go back to base and do the same thing
nunchuck19 1 year ago
@TankNutJohn89
I don't say the Abrams is bad, i like it but the fact that it is still the best is wrong. It might be as good as the Leopard but isn't the best. I think this video might explain everythin better. watch?v=z09Bf7I9UTQ&feature=related
JazzJaRa 1 year ago
@JazzJaRa most of those nations are small nations that a leo 2 can go accross in one feul tank pretty quickly. and they dont need to be used in numbers because of their quality. the abrams has high quality too but its also a tank used with numbers. it has more combat xp to
nunchuck19 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
This is the masonic tank and the merkava israeli is the zionist tank.. Both are terrorist tanks.
barbarotico 1 year ago
@barbarotico
Your a dumbass go fuck Tiger tanks-Neo Nazi tanks bitch!
SilentEagles 1 year ago 2
@SilentEagles Tiger Tank was and still is quite a marvel to behold. but there is no way it can compete with an Abrams. Abrams is 3 times faster, it weighs tons more, it is underpowered compared to the Abrams and The gun is only 88 mil whereas the Abrams is 105. Not to mention all the other things that are better, but i wouldnt have the room so we'll leave it at that. Tiger is a fighter but the Abrams is unbeatable, the only threat i see for an Abrams is that new Leopard tank.
Captain25011 1 year ago
@Captain25011 The abrams gun is 120mil
SuperPandawan 1 year ago
@SuperPandawan yeah yeah i know. as soon as i made that message i read it and said "shit someone's gonna call me on that"!!!! for some reason i was thinking of a firefly
Captain25011 1 year ago
@SuperPandawan A german Rheinmetall 120 mm gun:)
XxMiLlErAnGerxX 1 year ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@XxMiLlErAnGerxX Correct...And yes The US and Europe Forever...FUCK China
SuperPandawan 1 year ago
@SilentEagles The Germany use the Leopard 2 it's the other tank from the M1 project that was worked on by both Germany and USA, there tank and the US m1 are from the same project.
TheMilitaryTactics 1 year ago
@barbarotico oh here we go with this zionist bullshit
Sgreenenov13 1 month ago
My brother thinks the russian T-80 is better, but the M1A2 abrams is better who agrees with me?
Rimmington34071 1 year ago
I've heard that the army is looking to upgrade it creating the M1A3. Anybody know about this?
waldaddy2010 1 year ago
@waldaddy2010 I heard something similar, but I heard that they are looking to replace the abrams alltogether
FutureMarine246 1 year ago
Who plays that music?
innasdaqwetrust 1 year ago
@innasdaqwetrust rob dougan 'clubbed to death'
Malubvra 1 year ago
m60 patton looks much better! And it can easily be upgraded with a 120mm gun
MrPedoShine 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
LATEST NEWS FROM IRAQ (classified) : from the recent report Iraqi liberation Army has cornered american occupant on Iraqi territory causing enormous casualty (destroyed technical) and captured soldiers,american POW are well treated (new protocol),after a month they will be released-unharmed,in boots and underwear and with food for 2 days ( well balanced diet ) each POW must be supplied (mandatory) with pamphlet "touristic beauty of Iraq".
nedeljko18 1 year ago
Diesels are louder, larger, and more mechanically complex, but more fuel efficient and not as big a heat signature. Gas-turbines are smaller (much higher power-to-weight ratio), quieter, mechanically more simple, but put out a lot of heat and are fuel hogs.
That is why they aren't used in tractor trailer trucks, because at idle they consume lots of fuel.
So it's really which trade-offs a military prefers. The U.S. military prefers the gas-turbine, most other countries, a diesel.
WheelsRCool 1 year ago
USA MURDERS
HALK456456 1 year ago
@HALK456456
every country murders.
JinKazama92 1 year ago
this video in now on my favorites!!!!!
armytaskforce11x 1 year ago
I think American designers should stop pretending they know best, and listen more to the people who actually use tanks in real-world battles. For example, Israelis. With healthy exchange of ideas, both can benefit greatly...
vcz11 1 year ago
@vcz11 Actually we do exchange info with other allied nations. That how the Merkeva Mark 4 came to be the amazing tank it is today
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
The Abrams isnt based on the Leopard. The mbt 70 doesnt resemble the abrams one bit. Where do you guy get your info from? The germans and americans went thier separate was with design except for the main gun. And for the record the 120mm uses a german guntube and an american breech. It isnt just german.
cplkillbot 1 year ago
Catchaspoon is 100% Right On.
cplkillbot 1 year ago
This tank is the biggest Joke ever.^^
British Chubham armour, German Rheinmetall Canon, drinks fuel like hell, actually based on a Leopard 2. CHeap Rip off.
And you dumbasses still think that you've got the best tank, haha! :D
Countach187 1 year ago
It's not based on a Leopard two and it doesn't use british armor. It is possible for two countries to make the same thing, moron. It's quite obvious how much you know about tanks. Delete your life.
Catchaspoon 1 year ago
Actually the M1A1/2 uses British Chubham Armour... And also uses a German Canon... And it also is a tank who was builded out of a American and German Project. So yes, the Abrams has influences of a Leopard, clueless idiot.
And i guess i should delete my life because i'm not such a stupid patritism fucktard like you. It makes sense, haha.
Countach187 1 year ago
No you dumbass, we use armor based on the British design. We've also incorporated depleted uranium into our armor, which the British have not. So how can it be the same? Yes, it uses a 120mm main gun made by Reinmetal. Who cares? That does not make it based on the Leopard 2. The United States and Germany were working to make a MBT but each decided to go and make their own. We didn't base ours off theirs. What does knowing about tanks have to do with patriotism? Douche bag.
Catchaspoon 1 year ago
@Catchaspoon
Of cours the Abrams has Influences of an Leopard you american fucktard!!!!!!!!!!!! >:I
I know why most of the world population hates you stupid bastards! :P You know a shit about tanks or anything else you fat burger cunt! If you would know something about it you would'nt post bullshit like you do!
GET SOME EDUCATION! :/
Countach187 1 year ago
Uh, i have to support Countach...But dude, not every American is a fat idiot.. I guess every country has it's "Idiots"..
But...
The Abrams really is based on an Leopard... The first Prototype of the Leopard was modificated, and designed... and the result was the Arbams. It's also right, that germany and america wanted to create the "Kampfpanzer 70" (Is it called like this) Simple as it is, it's true...
And now both of you, shut the fuck up. Our countrys rocks, Out!
SaintOfSanfrancisco 1 year ago
@SaintOfSanfrancisco
Yeah okay. :/
Guess you're right... And catchaspoon, sorry for beeing so aggresive. Abrams and Leopard are anyway kinda "Brothers".^^
This disscusion is a bit out of control. We should relax and shut up.
If you want more information, ask a person you trust.^^
Countach187 1 year ago
The M1A2, T-90, Challenger and Leapord are by far the greatest tanks evr but nothing beats the US and Russian designs are the better of the current generation
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
Someone please tell me what is the music played inbetween the first music (from "Transformers") and the very end music (from "Pirates of the Carribean")!
WheelsRCool 2 years ago
this song is way over used
FATTYKMCFATFAT 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
our Black eagle prototype can defeat the abrams and so can our T90's
FATTYKMCFATFAT 2 years ago
Even if you destroyed 2 M1 abrams for everyone of your tanks, there would still be thousands more m1 abrams for you to take out. By that time most of your tanks would be taken out by American Airsupport. :P
AustinMontreal 2 years ago
@AustinMontreal thausand abams?
wtf are you talking about?
indeed there thousands buil(i think 10000) but thats if you count the numers of m1 abrams and the one that are at the repair pit(also 100 of it
my point is exualy the other tanks can be more easely repaired and produced then the abrams
i stil woudnt say any tank that is produced now is in every option "the best tank in the world"
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
Wrong. Russia has no military. It was secretly defeated by my penis in 1921. China dongs
UndefinedRhymes 2 years ago
as long as we can defeat the Ruskies I dont care which tank is better, we need to work together to defeat the Ruskies and the Chicoms and the ragheads. Cheers
MrTrajan69 2 years ago 2
Forget "ruskie" thats not an issue we both need to defeat jihad terrorist nut jobs before they get their hands on nukes and blow every one up.
OlderG0ds 2 years ago 2
I feel sorry for any nation that allows the terrorists to get any hands on nukes. If the terrorists get any nukes from N. Korea or Pakistan and the terrorists use them on ANY nation, that nation that supplied them will be gone. That has been our policy with nukes. You use nukes you will die with nukes.
MrTrajan69 2 years ago
That's the problem. It's not that they would be launched at us but they would just do suicide bombs with it. everyone is vulnerable to this.
I'm not worried 1 bit about N. Korea. It's Iran.
OlderG0ds 2 years ago
that is my point, Iran would give them to the terrorists then we would respond according to Iran.
MrTrajan69 2 years ago
@MrTrajan69 why woud the goverment of iran give such a thing to terorists?
they just want to let to see there power
nukes are just something like a statue but one that cant be used whit consequenses
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
@MrTrajan69 no we need to pake peace whit them
if you realy have the need to destroy something then begin whit the fucking talibs
after almost a decade they arent defeated yet you know
if we even cant take out those how coud we then take out whole russia
and taking out russia for what reason
they didnt anything verry wrong in the last years you know
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
another thing we won in again! go U.S.A!
ryushahkola 2 years ago
Nuclear lunch detected. Never Know What Hit Them. Ghost. bye bye tank and bye bye enemy tank. ICBMs they solve all our problems.
TheNexTechnoViking 2 years ago
Kind of like the mayor of Hiroshima, "wtf was that?"
MrTrajan69 2 years ago
Yeah, that solves all of your problems and all of anybody else's problems... A nuclear war would mean the end of the world, don't you realize that?
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
Hell yeah I do.....
and I am totally fine with that.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
Then go throw your self off a building and stop wasting everybody else's time...
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
Only if the rest of the world will do it with me.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
That's the point! If you have a death wish, then go kill yourself. Not ONE SINGLE PERSON has to die because you have a death wish, get it?
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
you aren't getting the point.
You are the one with a death wish. but you are in denial.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
Hahahahaa! You really made me laugh with this one. Who are you, Sigmund fucking Freud? You are the one that's talking about the world destruction, not me... So who has the death wish?
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
world destruction doesn't necessarily mean anyone has to die. I could just want all types government to crumble. you are the one with your first name and the word gun next to it. Stivi + gun to forehead = An Hero.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
The ICBMs won't just crumble the governments... A nuclear holocaust would leave behind a planet only inhabited by bugs & other creatures that immune to nuclear radiations. So what the fuck are you talking about?
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
do you have proof that the only things that would survive are bugs? post a link or gtfo
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
U need a proof for that..? What, u actually think YOU would survive? Then u must be crazier than I thought.The only ones that would survive would be the bugs & those that have specially built nuclear bunkers. Meaning, exactly the ones that you would like to see crumbling... So what would your nuclear war would solve after all?
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
post link for proof or gtfo
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
If you actually need a proof that a nuclear war would simply leave a planet that can't be inhabited by humans, then you don't even have the smallest general knowledge abt anything... I guess this would explain your statements abt ICBMs... Or is it possible that u r so stupid 2 actually believe that only u could destroy other countries with nuclear weapons & that yr geographical location would spare from the effects...? It's hard 2 believe that u can be that stupid...
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
You are a dumb troll. I know a lot about ICBMs nuclear fall out and so on and so forth. You on the other hand seem to believe everything that the government puts out. I have yet to see a link so GTFO BITCH!
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
You can search alone on the net, moron! I'm not gona bother giving you links about something that has become 2 be common sense and even a 5 year old kid would know! So GO FUCK YOUR SELF BITCH!
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
LINK OR GTFO BITCH. You have no evidence of anything no info, you have nothing. GTFO NOW.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
You don't even have the basic knowledge about the most elementary things that even a 5 year old would know.. You GO FUCK YOUR SELF!
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
GTFO now I refuse to talk to dumb trolls.
go back under you bridge troll.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
Yeah, yeah, go fuck your self moron!
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1
You are the moron you dumb butt hurt troll.
TheNexTechnoViking 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheNexTechnoViking It would be possible for that to happen yet highly unlikley. By what I know that would require the US and Russia to utilize the majority of their nuclear stockpiles and do so to where vast radiation poisioning would be spread evenly
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
Whats the argument about?
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
He doesn't believe that a nuclear war would leave a planet that would be completely uninhabitable for humans... If you can imagine that...
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1 It would be possible for that to happen yet highly unlikley. By what I know that would require the US and Russia to utilize the majority of their nuclear stockpiles and do so to where vast radiation poisioning would be spread evenly
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
& what do u think the Americans & the Russians would do in case a nuclear war brakes out? Use only a quarter of their nuclear arsenals? Or half? They would use everything they have. The nuclear radiations would leave almost nothing behind. Almost all the creatures would disappear. Except from bugs, rats or other radiations resistant creatures. Human life would disappear. Well, except maybe 4 those that have special bunkers. Namely, few politicians.
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1 Actually the MAD cocept would possibly prevent nuclear war all together but puch come to shove and worst case scenario the 2 nations would only hit strategic points such as capitals military infastructure factories that produce weapons and platforms. Use only what is necassary.
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
Even if they do what u say, a nuclear war would still leave behind a world that would be almost impossible 2 live in. The radioactive fallout would have devastating & irreversible consequences, not only on human beings, but also on the entire flora & fauna of the Earth. Our atmosphere is already fucked up by all sorts of radiations & polluting substances. So a nuclear war would leave us completely defenseless against all the ultraviolet & other emissions from the sun. It would become impossible
StiviGun1 1 year ago
2 walk out in the open during the daylight AT LEAST. The irreversible effects on the atmosphere would lead 2 radioactive rains & storms & hurricanes that otherwise wouldn't happen. A nuclear war would destabilize the entire cycle of how things work on planet Earth. A nuclear war, be a total 1 or just a war where only strategic points would be targeted, would leave behind a planet that would be almost impossible 2 live on. At least 4 the humans.
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@StiviGun1 That is true. Im not saying its impossible Im saying its unlikely
UltimateGohan2008 1 year ago
@UltimateGohan2008 Yeah, that's unlikely 'cause no one would want to destroy the planet. No one would want to start a war that would live behing an uninhabitable planet.
StiviGun1 1 year ago
Those Abrahams are worthless. They use to much fuel, and they are not reliable. Who build a fucking gasturbine engine in a tank: The US. In short: The're real American shit. The Leopard 2A6 is far more reliable, is better Armoured, en uses less fuel, because is has an 12-cilinder, 47 litre, turbocharged diesel-engine with 1500 HP. Nothing beats German engineering!
Eikel66 2 years ago
Hahahaha!!!! What makes you think you're qualified to make those statements? The M1 series tanks are the most powerful tanks in the world. Who cares that we didn't go diesel? We wanted more power, therefore, we have the gas turbine engine. We may not get great gas mileage but we still have a cruising range of 440km. The Leopard is NOT better armored. They still have not put depleted uranium in their armor, or their rounds. Therefore, they will continue to fall short of the Abrams.
Catchaspoon 2 years ago
Hey Catchaspoon, You know dog shit about tanks either. You wrote: 'We wanted more power'. Well, guess what: The Leopard has the same amount of power as the Abrahams: 1500 HP. And about their armour: The Leopard doesn't need that low-radioactive shit, because its armour is strong enough without it! And that goes also for its rounds. So it don't fall short, kid.
Eikel66 2 years ago
Because horse power is the only thing that comes into play with an engine....Well it's obvious what intelligence level I'm dealing with here. As far as the armor goes, they will get their shit ruined when they are trying to close 2,000m to get in range when they have DU sabots coming their way. They may have "strong" armor. But at the end of the day, it won't hold up against a DU Sabot round. The denser metal always wins....
Catchaspoon 2 years ago
Well, it's indeed obvious what intelligence level I'am dealing with: Brainless and not able to communicate with people in a normal way. You're an arrogant motherfucker. I don't hate America. I just don't like people like you: So, keep on jerking your self off at your Abrahams "tank", fucker. Meanwhile, I will go on looking at REAL tanks. Have a nice fucking day, dickhead.
Eikel66 2 years ago
And I'm just talking about the M1A1. If you want to talk 4 M1A2 SEPs, Fucking forget about it. With the ability to lock onto multiple targets at once and cycle through and automatically lock onto new targets once the old ones are destroyed. It's a much more combat efficient tank. Judging by your comments on other videos. You're just another toolbox that hates America and looks for any reason to shit out of your mouth.
Catchaspoon 2 years ago 2
its weaker and yet less armourd than the abrams, but more faster. I looked it up, just wanted to say that so this argument can be done with and we can peacefully watch this video
ryushahkola 2 years ago
I agree with you on the armor, but not on the rounds. The DU cored rounds are the most powerful penetrators. Nothing beats them. Also, I don't think there is any other tank that is better protected than the Abrams. The Leopard II is a very well protected tank, but I don't think is better protected than the Abrams, at least from the frontal side.
StiviGun1 1 year ago
@Catchaspoon sorry but abrams is to expensive and the massproduction rate is so low you know
i woud go for the leopard 2
yes low massproduction also but if theire woud be a world war the first thing you at least take in acount is that its not to expensive to drive the damn thing
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
Point noted, however, who cares how fast we can produce them? We've been making them for 20 years, we already have way more Abrams then Germany has Leo's and we have the logistics to back it up. Our tanks and crews are combat tested, hardened, and proven. In a world war, we would win before it started, as a country the USA has way more industrial strength than Germany, we can make anything faster than they can and we have superiority in every war aspect you can think of. We've proven it, twice.
Catchaspoon 1 year ago
dont you know what was one of the main reasons germany lost?
because the last type was so fucking expensive and slow made
in the beginning germany had more tanks and they werent destroyed easy
but then america and russia chose high massproduction weapons
and while germany maked tiger 2 and stuff they were overun by america and russia
usa indeed has the best buget in the world but that doesnt mean there is no end
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
This is not WW2, things are very different now. For one, Germany has a restriction on the size of it's army. So it's already vastly outnumbered against America alone. Not counting all the other countries that would follow us into battle. Besides, these days, every tank is very expensive and complex to build. That's just the nature of the beast. We aren't spending much more than them.
Catchaspoon 1 year ago
now its not ww2 i already know that lol
but you must know there are not much abram fabrics so still...
and what if there will be ww3?
and i wasnt talking about germany against the united states or something like that
jep every tank is expensive
but this tank is making numbers you know
more than an other
a
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
besides do you even know how expensive it is to repair one lol
more then something like the merkava or t 90 tanks
yes we know that are sertanly not the best in the world but less expensive
and in a war you have surly an advantage if youre the first that can send weapons to the batleground
thats why russia in ww2 coud adapt the batlefield to make traps against tanks and making dummy posisions and more important:taking stratic places
if they in that time woudnt have produced fast....
dontmakemeMAD1990 1 year ago
@Catchaspoon So citisens whining about their son getting shot is superiority?
wicNKWD37 1 year ago
What the hell are you talking about?
Catchaspoon 1 year ago
Speaking of the Leopard "falling short" They have the same main gun, 120mm, and yet only half the max effective range, maybe a little over 2,000m. Max effective range of the M1A1, 4,000m. So I guess your shitty rounds wouldn't make a difference anyways. And don't even think about coming back with some shit about it being able to go under water and attacking L.A. Blah blah. They can go under about 12 feet of water, WITH a snorkal kit, the same as the Abrams. You know dog shit about tanks, kid.
Catchaspoon 2 years ago
no they dont have the same gun the abrams uses L44 the same gun that the leopard 1 has
the leo 2 uses the L55 gun catchaspoon u know dog shit about tanks
minionator1 2 years ago
Are you serious you moron? I know you didn't know this before, so do you want me to tell you the difference between the L44 and the L55? It's just over a yard longer and has an increased muzzle velocity. If anything, you helped me prove my point. It has a higher muzzle velocity and STILL at half the max effective range. Stop splitting hairs trying to look smart, it's still for all practical purposes, the same gun, it's a 120mm. They can fire our rounds, we can fire theirs. Fucking tool.....
Catchaspoon 2 years ago 4
United States Marine Corps Armor, Semper Fi bitch.
Catchaspoon 2 years ago
Unites States Marine Corps Infantry
Supernova310 2 years ago