Given that many of these investigational anticancer drugs eventually fail, the animal models on which clinical trials are predicated must at best be limited in power, and at worst wildly inaccurate. Dr Alexander Kamb, Global Head of the Oncology Disease Area at the Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 4, 161 - 165.
So why do they do it?... “Animal studies are done for legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive value of such studies for man is meaningless.”; - Dr James D. Gallagher; Director of Medical Research; Lederle Laboratories; Journal of the American Medical Association; March 14 1964.;
"After intensive study of the issue, I am convinced that the Draize eye irritancy and the Lethal Dose 50 tests are inaccurate, unreliable, costly and cruel to the animals. The tests deceive the very consumers whom they are supposed to protect, by certifying as SAFE household products and cosmetics that cause two hundred thousand hospital-recorded poisonous exposures annually."
"As a practising physician who is Board certified in internal medicine and oncology, I can find no evidence that the Draize test, L.D. 50 test, or any other tests using animals to support the 'safety' of chemicals and cosmetics have any relevance to the human species. I strongly support legislation that prohibits the use of such animal tests by industry."
(Donald C. Doll, M.D., Columbia, Missouri, 1988.)
me parece muyy mal eso pues no se piensa en los sentimientos de ese animal....aver si empiesan a practicar con los presos por asesinato y los toreros y dejn a lo pobres animales empaz
skurwiała polityka, gówno w mediach, uliczni twardziele, za dzieciństwa naszych matek i ojców było kilku twardzieli, kilku lowelasów a reszta to poprostu szaraki były, teraz każdy chce byc twardziel i playboy i ludzie na nic innego nie zwracają uwagi. mamy tyle problemów do rozwiązania i tyle szarańczy do wybicia. a dobrowolnie przyjmujemy papkę jaką nas karmią. ludzie to tylko mięso i skóra - nie ma dusz i umysłów - udowadniają to na każdym kroku!
Pamietam ten utwór na liscie radiowej trójki na bardzo wysokiej pozycji....gdzies połowa albo początek lat '90tych. Teraz samym gównem młodzież jest karmiona.
This has been flagged as spam show
2005
Given that many of these investigational anticancer drugs eventually fail, the animal models on which clinical trials are predicated must at best be limited in power, and at worst wildly inaccurate. Dr Alexander Kamb, Global Head of the Oncology Disease Area at the Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 4, 161 - 165.
noratmedicine 1 year ago
So why do they do it?... “Animal studies are done for legal reasons and not for scientific reasons. The predictive value of such studies for man is meaningless.”; - Dr James D. Gallagher; Director of Medical Research; Lederle Laboratories; Journal of the American Medical Association; March 14 1964.;
curedisease. net
noratmedicine 1 year ago
# "The results of these tests are of no use to physicians."
(Sandra Davies, M.D., Columbia, Maryland.)
# "The results of these (animal) tests cannot be used to predict toxicity or to guide therapy in human exposure."
(Christopher D. Smith, M.D., Longbeach, California.)
# "The data produced by these tests don't keep harmful products from being sold."
(Ellen Michael, M.D., Beverley Shores, Indiana.)
noratmedicine 1 year ago
"After intensive study of the issue, I am convinced that the Draize eye irritancy and the Lethal Dose 50 tests are inaccurate, unreliable, costly and cruel to the animals. The tests deceive the very consumers whom they are supposed to protect, by certifying as SAFE household products and cosmetics that cause two hundred thousand hospital-recorded poisonous exposures annually."
(Paula Kislak, D.V.M., Sherman Oaks, California.)
noratmedicine 1 year ago
"As a practising physician who is Board certified in internal medicine and oncology, I can find no evidence that the Draize test, L.D. 50 test, or any other tests using animals to support the 'safety' of chemicals and cosmetics have any relevance to the human species. I strongly support legislation that prohibits the use of such animal tests by industry."
(Donald C. Doll, M.D., Columbia, Missouri, 1988.)
noratmedicine 1 year ago
me parece muyy mal eso pues no se piensa en los sentimientos de ese animal....aver si empiesan a practicar con los presos por asesinato y los toreros y dejn a lo pobres animales empaz
ranmay12 2 years ago
skurwiała polityka, gówno w mediach, uliczni twardziele, za dzieciństwa naszych matek i ojców było kilku twardzieli, kilku lowelasów a reszta to poprostu szaraki były, teraz każdy chce byc twardziel i playboy i ludzie na nic innego nie zwracają uwagi. mamy tyle problemów do rozwiązania i tyle szarańczy do wybicia. a dobrowolnie przyjmujemy papkę jaką nas karmią. ludzie to tylko mięso i skóra - nie ma dusz i umysłów - udowadniają to na każdym kroku!
mateuszb54 2 years ago
Aha i pozdro dla autora, za przypomnienie mi zespołu Quo Vadis. Przyłożyłeś się chłopie
regan98 2 years ago
Pamietam ten utwór na liscie radiowej trójki na bardzo wysokiej pozycji....gdzies połowa albo początek lat '90tych. Teraz samym gównem młodzież jest karmiona.
regan98 2 years ago