But, the cold, hard fact is that nature kind of embeds such flaunting/traits into every living thing. Just look at the animal kingdom for example. While most other animals do not have human-like breasts, they use whatever natural physical enhancements they have to obtain the best mates, resources, etc. Sadly, nature has designed this world to be a very visual structured experience. Often, I don't even think well-endowed ladies realize how much their enhancements advance them.
Each person has to decide what he or she is willing to do to 'be a success' here or anywhere else, ANY woman can get attention here if she brings her puppies out to play on YouTube. I guess that's a natural advantage men don't have. Of course, if you're a man and you LOOK smart and you can speak with clarity, a lot of people will believe whatever you tell them, so that might even the playing field I guess.
I just reread my comment and I think it's A LOT more sexist sounding than I'd intended. I think I'll quit though before I do more harm by trying to fix my faux pas...
@2bsirius "ANY woman can get attention here if she brings her puppies out to play on YouTube." omg I laughed so hard! LOL
Some pull it off better than others, unfortunately, we still live in a society that undervalues intelligence. I would go as far to suggest that intelligent woman are not always liked. Which burns me! How do we change this?
@Maiyanna We can't change this. Unfortunately, man is animal first and intellects second; it's just nature! If people are willing to pay money to watch these women show off their T & A then i guess you have to blame the people and not the women. Many people will do just about anything for easy money. These are just my thoughts!
Hmm...this seems like an issue of physical assets, vs mental assets.
Is it wrong for a clever/smart person to use their assets for money?
The question comes down to, what does the viewer get, since no matter what, producers will use their assets. I think intellectually stimulating videos often get me more than any other kind, however everybody has their own tastes :)
@TheReasonWhyGuy - I'm loving these answers. I get so much more from something that's intellectually stimulating as well. Yet, so many have reached success this way, so what do I know? ;)
As far as YouTube is concerned just about anything goes:) Personally I'd watch Spricket even if she had tiny boobs. She's a blast to watch. Now if she had tiny boobs *and* was ugly that might change things a bit:)
In an office type of situation I'd say, yes, do use all your assets but do it in a more subtle way as opposed to a more overt way. If you go toooo far over the line other people in the office are going to get pissed about every little *percieved* favor you get, whether deserved or not
@Blinkazoid - That's a good point, in the fishbowl of the work setting, everyone knows everyone else's business.
I've been subbed to Spricket since my early days here, it says something for her that she has such a diverse group of subscribers. I used her as an example though, because I've noticed, as YT has become more competitive, she has been willing to show more skin. Survival! ;)
I have absolutely no problem with people making a living using whatever assets they may have been lucky enough to be born with...good looks, higher intellegence, interesting body features, etc... Being attractive is only one, what about being extreremely short needed for a Willy Wonka movie or someone born with incredible right side brain function being hired as an artist. Using the luck of the draw is fine with me. I like Spricket but I watch her videos because they're really funny.
@grumpychuck - Yes, on the very surface of the issue, it just seems logical to use any and all positive attributes. So maybe it's not a question of should one, but how far? ;)
I view it as a choice of people who do it and people who go for it. That I think it's shallow and irrelevant doesn't matter because if you choose to do it, then accept the hassles that go with it (see Caylyn's comment) and accept the consequences.
It's a matter of personal values and ethics. We all use charm or whatever personable traits we have to some extent or another but exploiting them is different. I think it's questionable and reserve the right to make a judgment about those who do.
@jrsnyderjr - Well I've already stated that I'm a prude, I would personally prefer to be exploited in other ways. lol
However, there are times, when I do think those who can live their life, completely uninhibited, just might be getting more out of life, than someone like myself who is more reserved is getting. I guess I'm moving beyond monetary gains with that one...
@Maiyanna Uninhibited is in the eyes of the beholder I think. I'm a lot less concerned about what others think now I've gotten 'mature' and that has freed me to get more out of life than I used to. Still, I think you're right, I might also get more out of it if I was more uninhibited.
I do agree though that's a different thing than exploiting your "assets" for monetary gain. Those that do I bet have some angst in the mix somewhere about doing it they may not acknowledge.
You have a point! I'm thinking time to put the "twins" up on YouTube and see what happens. Might be better than picking out street corner. (J/K The twins don't like having people staring at them! ha!)
My take on using your "assets" is, if you do, then don't go crying that people treat you as a sex object and that is all people are looking at. If you are using your assets in that way there is some crap that comes with it. If you can take it, go for it and take responsibility for your decision.
@msginca - I had forgotten about playboy/sports illustrated. I'm not sure how I feel about woman or men as pure sex objets. On one hand, it's a living, a good living for some. But on the other hand, it's all so superficial.
I believe we all do it to a certain extent....If the looks are not there then perhaps the mind will become a greater asset. It is really hard to measure "success" just in monetary terms....good question...regards...
@schoolmaster1945 - I wonder that too. If one is made aware early in life that they can get by on their looks, does this hinder them from developing other assets in life?
This is an excellent and very interesting question! I've been pondering this very same thing for a while now, however. I don't know if it's right or wrong, i just don't know.
But, the cold, hard fact is that nature kind of embeds such flaunting/traits into every living thing. Just look at the animal kingdom for example. While most other animals do not have human-like breasts, they use whatever natural physical enhancements they have to obtain the best mates, resources, etc. Sadly, nature has designed this world to be a very visual structured experience. Often, I don't even think well-endowed ladies realize how much their enhancements advance them.
VideoGuyNC 1 month ago
@VideoGuyNC - All good points. ;)
Maiyanna 1 month ago
in a word-'exploitation'-you may or may not be exploited, but if you were it must be AN AWFUL FEELING !
kjack5 9 months ago
All is fair, I say...
fehquig 9 months ago
Each person has to decide what he or she is willing to do to 'be a success' here or anywhere else, ANY woman can get attention here if she brings her puppies out to play on YouTube. I guess that's a natural advantage men don't have. Of course, if you're a man and you LOOK smart and you can speak with clarity, a lot of people will believe whatever you tell them, so that might even the playing field I guess.
2bsirius 9 months ago
(2)
I just reread my comment and I think it's A LOT more sexist sounding than I'd intended. I think I'll quit though before I do more harm by trying to fix my faux pas...
2bsirius 9 months ago
@2bsirius "ANY woman can get attention here if she brings her puppies out to play on YouTube." omg I laughed so hard! LOL
Some pull it off better than others, unfortunately, we still live in a society that undervalues intelligence. I would go as far to suggest that intelligent woman are not always liked. Which burns me! How do we change this?
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Maiyanna
What? There is someone on YouTube who doesn't like me? What a surprise ;¬)
2bsirius 9 months ago
@Maiyanna We can't change this. Unfortunately, man is animal first and intellects second; it's just nature! If people are willing to pay money to watch these women show off their T & A then i guess you have to blame the people and not the women. Many people will do just about anything for easy money. These are just my thoughts!
cain825 9 months ago
Hmm...this seems like an issue of physical assets, vs mental assets.
Is it wrong for a clever/smart person to use their assets for money?
The question comes down to, what does the viewer get, since no matter what, producers will use their assets. I think intellectually stimulating videos often get me more than any other kind, however everybody has their own tastes :)
TheReasonWhyGuy 9 months ago
@TheReasonWhyGuy - I'm loving these answers. I get so much more from something that's intellectually stimulating as well. Yet, so many have reached success this way, so what do I know? ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Maiyanna Well just because something works often, doesn't mean anything more than, that they are targeting something more popular/commonly liked.
Most people don't care that much about deeply thinking, thus shallow videos are what they like.
TheReasonWhyGuy 9 months ago
As far as YouTube is concerned just about anything goes:) Personally I'd watch Spricket even if she had tiny boobs. She's a blast to watch. Now if she had tiny boobs *and* was ugly that might change things a bit:)
In an office type of situation I'd say, yes, do use all your assets but do it in a more subtle way as opposed to a more overt way. If you go toooo far over the line other people in the office are going to get pissed about every little *percieved* favor you get, whether deserved or not
Blinkazoid 9 months ago
@Blinkazoid - That's a good point, in the fishbowl of the work setting, everyone knows everyone else's business.
I've been subbed to Spricket since my early days here, it says something for her that she has such a diverse group of subscribers. I used her as an example though, because I've noticed, as YT has become more competitive, she has been willing to show more skin. Survival! ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
I have absolutely no problem with people making a living using whatever assets they may have been lucky enough to be born with...good looks, higher intellegence, interesting body features, etc... Being attractive is only one, what about being extreremely short needed for a Willy Wonka movie or someone born with incredible right side brain function being hired as an artist. Using the luck of the draw is fine with me. I like Spricket but I watch her videos because they're really funny.
grumpychuck 9 months ago
@grumpychuck - Yes, on the very surface of the issue, it just seems logical to use any and all positive attributes. So maybe it's not a question of should one, but how far? ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
I view it as a choice of people who do it and people who go for it. That I think it's shallow and irrelevant doesn't matter because if you choose to do it, then accept the hassles that go with it (see Caylyn's comment) and accept the consequences.
It's a matter of personal values and ethics. We all use charm or whatever personable traits we have to some extent or another but exploiting them is different. I think it's questionable and reserve the right to make a judgment about those who do.
jrsnyderjr 9 months ago
@jrsnyderjr - Well I've already stated that I'm a prude, I would personally prefer to be exploited in other ways. lol
However, there are times, when I do think those who can live their life, completely uninhibited, just might be getting more out of life, than someone like myself who is more reserved is getting. I guess I'm moving beyond monetary gains with that one...
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Maiyanna Uninhibited is in the eyes of the beholder I think. I'm a lot less concerned about what others think now I've gotten 'mature' and that has freed me to get more out of life than I used to. Still, I think you're right, I might also get more out of it if I was more uninhibited.
I do agree though that's a different thing than exploiting your "assets" for monetary gain. Those that do I bet have some angst in the mix somewhere about doing it they may not acknowledge.
jrsnyderjr 9 months ago
Having a big cock is'nt everthing but somtimes its helps.
popebenadict16 9 months ago
@popebenadict16
I only know that cause it works for me.
popebenadict16 9 months ago
@popebenadict16 - lol ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
I'm not sure. Is it OK for a man to show a big bulge?
Perroquet51 9 months ago
@Perroquet51 - Hmm, good question. Well, perhaps it depends on the man? It seems okay for ballerinos.... lol
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Perroquet51
oohh
popebenadict16 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Perroquet51
In my case yes.
popebenadict16 9 months ago
Yes!! Use it all!!! 8‹D
Elaina43 9 months ago
@Elaina43 - Okay then Elaina, I'll be expecting to see a little cleavage in your next vid. lol ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Maiyanna OH! lol I wasn't talkin' 'bout ME...
Elaina43 9 months ago
You have a point! I'm thinking time to put the "twins" up on YouTube and see what happens. Might be better than picking out street corner. (J/K The twins don't like having people staring at them! ha!)
My take on using your "assets" is, if you do, then don't go crying that people treat you as a sex object and that is all people are looking at. If you are using your assets in that way there is some crap that comes with it. If you can take it, go for it and take responsibility for your decision.
GreatGig1 9 months ago
@GreatGig1 - LOL "the twins"
That's a good point, there are always consequences to consider. ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@GreatGig1 Excellent point!
cain825 9 months ago
Comment removed
msginca 9 months ago
@msginca - Yes, lots of sexy woman showing their assets. ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Maiyanna
Actually, it was just one woman, but that's not the point ... the message there is "Live Life" or to put it another Way ... go for it.
msginca 9 months ago
@msginca - I had forgotten about playboy/sports illustrated. I'm not sure how I feel about woman or men as pure sex objets. On one hand, it's a living, a good living for some. But on the other hand, it's all so superficial.
I don't know?
Maiyanna 9 months ago
@Maiyanna
Bar wanted the cover of SI *and got it* .... Live Life ... go for it
msginca 9 months ago
I believe we all do it to a certain extent....If the looks are not there then perhaps the mind will become a greater asset. It is really hard to measure "success" just in monetary terms....good question...regards...
schoolmaster1945 9 months ago
@schoolmaster1945 - I wonder that too. If one is made aware early in life that they can get by on their looks, does this hinder them from developing other assets in life?
Maiyanna 9 months ago
90, maybe 100 yrs ... then you're gone .... for all time.
*Go for it Spricket* ... and anyone else with that spirit.
msginca 9 months ago
i see nothing wrong in this. it's not something i'm interested in watching, but i say use whatever you've got. =)
TJay9000 9 months ago
@TJay9000 - Okay, I confess, I can't keep my eyes off of Inmendham. There, you made me say it! lol ;)
Maiyanna 9 months ago
This is an excellent and very interesting question! I've been pondering this very same thing for a while now, however. I don't know if it's right or wrong, i just don't know.
cain825 9 months ago
@cain825 - I don't know either, that's why I was asking. lol
Maiyanna 9 months ago