Theory Of Everything - On The Theory Of Relativity

[TheCrazyCello]

1. It is not necessary to construct Special Relativity on the assumption that the speed of light is invariant, although historically this is how it has been done.

2. The observed retardation of the speed of light in the presence of masses by a far-observer is accounted for in General Relativity by the strong equivalence principle. ALL observations to date agree ENTIRELY with General Relativity. The speed of light in the vicinity of mass is invariant, but in a warped spacetime metric.

[Etimespace]

3.

This enormeously rapid movement takes perhaps in a moment all the energy of the

visible universe away from that space where it locates at the moment.

4.

Because of this movement this space does not need to expand and this points out that

the so called "Big Bang" theory is a wrong theory. All the things can be explained

three-dimentionally. All the substance has been born during the movement.

search youtube video

Idea from Kuopio

[protheory]

I'll take that one as a compliment I think lol

[protheory]

I just got your reply, thanks for that, I appreciate it. Would you mind if either I post your message as a comment or you do please? I made this video to try and explain Pro theory not really to explain every intricacy of Relativity but all the same if something I've said needs correcting I'd like others to know as well.

[JAL173]

I just replied.

[protheory]

MaceWright, thanks for your comment. I'm not so sure I'm into anything constant and unchanging but I'll have a think about your comments here. My main problem with the speed of light in a vacuum is that it's classically assumed to be unchanging I suppose.

[protheory]

JAL173, I've messaged you a couple of weeks ago to ask you for details of where I'm way off on my understanding but you've not yet replied to me. Just so everybody knows I take all comments at face value :)

[MaceWright]

It seems that light cancels out relative speeds to remain at a constant. If there were speeds faster than light, would those cancel out the then relative speed of light?

It seems to me all of this stuff comes down to different densities. More non-local densities cancel out more local ones.

[protheory]

I'm not really interested in the technicalities of Relativity I'm more interested in my theory of everything. Thanks for your comment though.

[JAL173]

You obviously don't understand much about relativity. I could point out many flaws in your comments, but there isn't enough room. I will say that your understanding of E=mc^2 is way off. It describes how much energy is released in the conversion of matter to energy and vice versa.

[protheory]

Quite right, light is a changing entity therefore it shouldn't be viewed as a constant. Light in a vacuum is the constant in this context but I'm not so sure it's unchanging.

[protheory]

Glad I could help :)

[setaynalac]

Thank you for attempting to help me understand. I have been trying to get a handle on some of this stuff for about a year. Like you, I have no degrees, I just want t have a better personal understanding.

[dizzo95]

Q; Does the Red Shift of Cosmic Light , prove the Earth is at the center of the Universe ?

A; Yes , if Motion started on Earth then the Earth would be at the center of the Universe .

It is possible Human Beings created particles that traveled back in space-time to start motion in a motionless gravity vacuum field even 60 Billion Years ago.

Q: Would that mean Human Beings are baby gods ?

A: Yes, Human Beings are baby gods and most likely create baby universes.

[protheory]

No, I don't have any degrees unfortunately :( I just know my three potentials idea extremely well and I try to teach myself how to answer these problems in terms that both laymen and physicists will understand.

[sultantujen]

Do you have any degrees in physics?

[protheory]

The point of the clip is to explain my own ideas really more than to explain all the complicated details.

I'm just trying to get used to talking about this stuff on camera still :)