no way this is a suit ,and if it is its the best suit ever,,def real,, look at the crap suits in planet of the apes made a yr after this ,if patterson made this hes the man at making costumes ,,,,no question real
People are dumb that say its not real, it may be a hoax but the reasons why people say its a hoax, is dumb.... You guys need to remember this is the freaking 1960's! Now if this video was made in 2012 then yes, you could argue its fake and a good costume, and a costume like this and how easily that creature is walking, would b impossible during the 60's. Gorillas werent confirmed till the 1920's so maybe this is an American Gorilla, experts say about 85-90% of living organisms have yet been dis
FAKE. lol this is so fake. you can even see the human eyes. and a creature that we have never seen before would not walk away so caimly after looking DIRECTLY at you, it'd either run after you cand attack you, or run away. just some guys wanting attention. and of course he'd lie and say it's real, would you want the whole world to know you lied about some thing like this? everyone would hate you.
1st, The person who made the costume just make the skin first then add the fur on later this explains that you can see the quadriceps, and it might not be damage muscle but a damaged suit.2 Its a suit, u can hang the shoulder length, my uncle uses football pads and or special effect stuffing to make costumes shoulders bigger.3 the reason why i cant be duplicated is because when someone puts a lot of time and effort into something, then its hard to make an exact copy of that thing.0 characters -
There is more proof that this is an undiscovered creature. The people who don't believe in 'Bigfoot' are the sheep type who are scared to think outside the tiny box they live in: "What will my friends think of me?" Even if you're the minority of one, the truth is still the truth. So even if the majority don't believe in Bigfoot, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Statistics mean nothing regarding truth. One time ago, most people didn't believe the Earth was round.
@UpTubes NO the people who don't believe are rational people who believe that there should be proof, if you are going to make a claim that something exists or not.Even if you give the absence of proof is not proof of absence argument, you still cant say that is film is proof because you can so clearly debunk this.
Still remember seeing this as a kid in the 70's, whew!! The head turn w/shoulders in tow is another fact, gorillas do that too. A person in a suit would just turn their head, like many do in movies/shows. because ah, we can, ha ha. I feel these guys are more intelligent/in touch w/surroundings than we know, which is one reason it's been tough catch 'em. Watch Bigfoot Lives on Netfix, great movie for almost free! Thanx for the info/clip!!!
Nope. When you wear a tighting fitting suit like that you have to turn your whole body to maintain visual alignment, just like what you see in the film.
I believe sasquatch is real. I believe the Patterson/Gimlin film is real. Why not? Why is it so hard to accept the concept of Bigfoot? Patty's haunting eyes and the way she walks, the whole thing. I have been doing my own research on Bigfoot for years. This film and others I have seen is enough evidence for me that it's real. I believe these animals are very real and they need to be protected. I also believe they are in danger of being extinct.
Yes exactly the suit has been recreated at least twice and they're exact matches but bigfooters lie and deny it just like they do about everything else.
you might take a look at Deefoots video, it has all the evidence to back up the costume in the first 6 seconds, because it has been recreated. Everyone uses the comment why hasnt someone? or why hasnt it...well it has , no one chooses to do the research. It is my hopes that Deefoot shows more of the creation
Apparently bigfooters don't like to think about the people who peddle the bigfoot myth doing it for money. Bigfooters always deny the money aspect but its the ONLY reason the bigfoot myth still continues.
If Al DeAtlas made millions on the PGF, news to me and rest of the world, then what's he doing sitting in Yakima still and not in some Bel Air mansion? lol You're full of tall rumor stories, eminbozo, that's all your are and it makes you the most easy sucker and gullible geek ever here. So watch your tongue who you call geeks in the future, eh, they don't come any bigger than you and your obsessive wrong babble.
''The appearance of muscle mass displayed in the film has not yet been matched by a costume in the entertainment industry '' One sentence that all Bigfoot non believers cannot dispute. because they know its 100% FACT, instead they choose to ignore it, and waffle on about Bob Heironimus ,Chambers. Whatever ! . The day rumors stand up in an argument will be the day i start watching desperate housewives . End of story
@eminboztepe Just Because he knows bob H means F**** all to me it proves nothing.
I'm aware they were taped I have heard them myself I'm talking about the way he runs Patterson into the ground with he is a ' con man ' and liar attitude. He never said one positive about him yet jumps up in excitement at Bob .H's claim why ? ,
AL DeAtley is a greedy pig that is why he said it's fake to get more money from it because he spent his Share, it's the perfect thing to do.
@eminboztepe Just Because he knows bob H means F all to me it proves nothing.
I'm aware they were taped I have heard them myself I'm talking about the way he runs Patterson into the ground with he is a ' con man ' and liar attitude. He never said one positive about him yet jumps up in excitement at Bob .H's claim why ? ,
AL DeAtley is a greedy pig that is why he said it's fake to get more money from it because he spent his Share, it's the perfect thing to do.
@eminboztepe You can sit here and call me a lier and Fraud till the cows come home, It's Not gonna make me shut up. Freedom of speech :D If you don't Like what i say Don't reply
this is authentic evidence. if you look online, there are comparisons but when you compare a attempt to replicate and the real film, the patty film is different then a man in a suit. also, we know chimpanzees exist from only bones of captive specimens and an extinct 10 foot tall ape from a jaw and teeth, so why cant Bigfoot be real?
BIgfoot has been determined to be a Bipedal Hominid, and MUST be quite intelligent to go undetected........look how the "little people of Flores" were only JUST QUITE RECENTLY found out! Evolution is not yet completely understood...Edgar Caycee mentioned these various humans....giants & little tiny people.
@eminboztepe You can laugh, or get an education on this....its up 2 you...remember they laughed at the idea of the Earth not really being Flat..."The little People of Flores" is well documented , you can laugh @ me...or just google it then sit back and watch Nova, w/ the Archeologist reports...let me know if you need help..
@rockstarzep So bob h who came forward and told it was him wearing the outfit is lying also huh? He took a polygraph that was televised it he passed the test, but im sure you will still say he is lying. Sorry but this is not real, i seen all the vids and all of them is fake, there is no proof they ever existed,.
@rockstarzep Have you seen the vid "Patterson / Gimlin: The final word" ? No way can you watch that and still believe the patterson film is still real, and there is also a vid showing all the flaws in the suit, after watching these 2 vids, and never been shown a body or bones, its easy to know its fake. Just a bunch of people making money off a myth, i just don't and will not believe it until there is proof.
@MrGregster17 How dumb are you my friend, we have seen bears, at the zoo, there have been dead bodies of bears found, and we are able to study bears and learn about them when captured, but not big foot. Nothing but fake foot prints, and vids, no body, no bones, nothing ever found to show that it's real and not a hoax, like aliens, loch ness monster means not real, so there is no big foot.
@blackstersherron Just because they haven't found one yet doesn't mean they don't exist. Don't call me dumb. Were you there in 1967? If not then don't comment. Watch the Bill Munn analysis of the film. I'd rather beleive him then somebody with no credentials.
You know who was there in 1967? The man who financed the film. The man who was Roger's brother in law. The man who used the film to get his paving company out of the red.
@eminboztepe Al DeAtley the same man that was annoyed because they didn't pay him as much as he wanted ? it's probably why he is saying its a hoax now ... wasn't that just a rumor anyway ? Have you been reading that Greg long's book what a crock of shit that was !. You do know a lot of that stuff in that book was proven to be lies and a lot of these so called interviews never actually happened !
You are full of crap. Al DeAtley financed the film and made millions off it. All conversations in Greg Long's book were taped recorded. No one ever sued him for libel, slander, nothing.
You are have exposed yourself for being a liar and a fraud at this point.
@eminboztepe As it stands I can think of at least 5 people right now who have "admitted" to being bigfoot. At the very least, 4 out of those 5 people are obviously wackos, which leads us to the very real chance that 5 out of 5 are.
Yaw. Bob Heironimus is in reel two of the film. Bob Heironimus personally KNEW Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson. He is not just some random guy that came out and said, "Hey, I was the one who wore the costume."
Dr. Melba Ketchum update: I thought we would be finished in a few weeks, but instead, Sasquatch threw us curve balls even with their DNA which can be as elusive as they are.We are past that! As a result, we have assembled a renowned team, each of us with our own specialties to make this project "extraordinary".If everyone will hang in there, I promise it will be worth the wait. We have the proof, now just give us the opportunity to present it in a form that will even convince skeptics.
There she goes again with the wa chang mask bullshit..remember emin does that mean jon cotner is elvis ? silly sausage..go to emins page , but dont disagree with her or youre banned ha ha also take note at the number of people that have clicked "liked"..was zero a few mins ago... haha fuckin wa chang ? looks like albert steptoe.. "haaaaaaarrrolllllld
I keep an open mind. I see both problem and evidence in the PGF. Its fascinating to me that after 44 years this piece of film is still such a controversy. If it was just cowboys making a hookey film, they did a helluva job.
So where is the scientific validation that a footprint can be used to get the height of the creature who made it? There is none-its made up bullsh1t. Can u figure the height of a giraffe from its print? NO! Patterson said his creature was a shade over 6 ft. So he was lying?
If the footprints are 14.5 inches, you can actually estimate the height of the bigfoot (see 1:49 of bigfoot sasquatch evidence video) by proportion to be 14.5 x 6 = 87 inches = 7'3". Even Seemorebutts can do that.
You ask what else the lump in the leg could be. Surely it could be almost anything left in the pocket of the suit wearer? The only thing that seems clear to me is that the video is too unclear to say anything menaingful about it. I'm not sure about the distance stuff, but making a suit with raised shoulders woudl be a piece of cake. The BBC reconstruction looks nothing like the patterson film, but it looks like a more convincing bipedal ape.
That's because the BBC wasn't trying to replicate the suit. Why this absurd rumor persists is beyond me.
John Vulich simply grabbed a red ape suit from Optic Nerve that they had hanging up in their shop. No one was trying to duplicate anything. The BBC didn't think that the suit in the PGF was red with black hands and feet.
filmed or photos... where is a suit like this? If John Chambers was the best in fx at that time and we saw his best work that won the Oscar for it in Planet of the Apes. You have 68 Years to find one example better... and maybe in total of 150 years of photography. Find one as good as the Bigfoot Suit. Full Body Suit.. with muscles, boobs, etc. We saw the BBC's 1967 version with 1967 materials on their special made about a decade ag and it looked NOTHING like it! Where were the muscles?boobs?
Actually John Chambers put the suit together. The BBC never tried to replicate the suit either. John Vulich grabbed a red ape suit from Optic Nerve per the producer's idea to see what it would look like when shot with a simliar camera. Why this myth continues to survive is beyond me.
It's a bad fur suit. That's why it was shot blurry and out of focus. See my youtube video for details and pictures of the suit parts they used.
@eminboztepe I just watched would say your best angle/evidence is the mask! That is good work by you or whoever did it! But the body of the suit isnt close... I see where your going with it, and your trying to piece together something to explain that... even in the star trek episode it looks bad, Planet of the Apes they hid the bodies because they couldnt make something that worked. But ill say 90% of your angle which makes anyone think is the face! Thats good work on your part! Im honest
I don't have any pictures of the body they used to build Patty. Jeff Pruitt does, though. It was from a bear costume that Prohaska modified.
By the way, the mask was originally by Buck Maffei for a Star Trek episode. By some strange coincidence, he also worked at the same rodeo as Roger (Corriganville).
@eminboztepe if pruitt has concrete proof of a hoax why doesnt he go public whith it,some documentary would pay him decent money to expose the hoax,wouldnt they? this is all he said she said,the only way to prove its a hoax is for gimlin to say it or pat patterson saying roger told her it was a fake.
You seem to be under the strange impression that the general public out there knows about this film and thinks it is real. The fact is that few people know about this film and the ones that do say it is a man in a suit. No documentary would make any money off saying it is fake, since no one thinks it is real to start with.
@eminboztepe you are 100% right ,most people have no idea what the pg film is, and most who have seen it think its a fake. i was always aware of this fact,but some who give the film a chance and take a good look at it think it could be real.
The only one that I know that thinks it is real is Meldrum. Haven't you ever noticed that he is on EVERY bigfoot show? Why is that? It is because they can't find anyone else.
Meldrum also said the Snow Walker footage was real too. He was wrong. He said the Memorial Day Footage was real. He was wrong again. And the PGF? Fake too, though he won't admit it.
@eminboztepe i think meldrum is a weird guy,he puts out some strange mormon books and was fooled by the m.day footage and snowalker,i thought snowalker looked pretty good for a hoax,more than meldrum say pg film is real on some tv specials,forgive my spelling on some of these guys,grover krantz,john bindernagel,christopher murphy,loren coleman,john green,rene dahinden,peter byrne.
@eminboztepe yes they are lol, i put them down because i heard them back the film in tv specials from years past, so it is and was more than just meldrum, you said meldrum wont admit pg film is a hoax,are you saying meldrum does think its fake but wont say it because he is in to deep?
Not sure. He certainly has a financial stake in it (he sells "casts" and the like for money).
Even Jane Goodall has recetly disassociated herself with bigfoot. But yes, all the old "bigfooters" are dead. There really isn't anyone today with any real credibility that thinks the film is real.
@SuperTestfreak Jane Goodhall doesn't want to say clearly whether she believes or not. She didn't say no, and disassociate herself, that is out of context. She probably hasn't studied it enough to commit to an opinion. She joked that she would love to believe it, but didn't elaborate due to being misquoted, or mislabeled as a definate believe or something. That's what I heard, but you should always do independent research and not listen to anyone in particular.
On her website. Jane says that she has not done any bigfoot research. In an interview a few years ago, she that bigfoot may not exist. She also said that she WANTED for them to exist because she "is a romantic".
And yet the bigfoot nerds continue to quote her. Of course, due to the law of large numbers, there will ALWAYS be SOMEONE who believes in something for the fans to quote, whether it be bigfoot, ghosts, fake moon landings, etc.
@eminboztepe Do ALLOT more work/research on the Body with examples in some other movies or something to prove more your point of piece parting a suit seperate... then you might have something! If Hollywood couldnt do a full body suit and not a tight body suit where muscles read under the fur/clothe... these guys wouldnt be able too! But good job on the Face Angle. Keep working on it though!
Movies have a bigger budget then a 1968 Nature Documentary.. why wasnt there a better example of a "monkey suit" in a movie back then? Name the movie where a suit is this good from 1968 - 1900 when filming and movies started
As a rational minded person, I can honestly say that this is an unsolved mystery and will probably never be solved. The people who claim with absolute certainty that this was just a hoax are just as closed minded and deluded as anyone who would claim with absolute certainty that this was a real fliming of a sasquatch.
I disagree. It is flat out impossible that Roger just happened to film a bigfoot who has a face that perfectly matches a headpiece that was made by a business associate of his during the year prior, AND that very same headpiece was worn by someone Roger worked with at the same rodeo.
Anyone who claims coincidence is simply deluding themselves.
@eminboztepe Actually that headpiece is not an exact match at all. Look at how much wider the nose is, and look at how far down the eyebrows are and note their pointed shape. It's close, but it's not exact.
@eminboztepe Computers have also said that no human can match the gait of Patty. GTFO with your incessant bullshit. You're so "matter of fact", like there's just NO WAY your point can be argued.
Anyone can do the walk. Watched a guy in a studio do it perfect after just a few tries. When you're wearing big fake feet it's natural to step like that. Look at the ass.....it's a ass pad folks. It's not even a good one, it's deformed looking. I saw a good still of it when it turns and on one of the arms, you could see on the forearm that the suit was all bunched up. It's fake ya'll....Bigfoot is real, but this is not it, it's just Bob.
@eminboztepe The nose is clearly wider, and you don't have a good enough of a shot of Patterson's face to say that it's an exact match. The hair covering his face makes it too hard to tell if it matches. But the nose is clearly much wider and by the way where's the copyright or proof that your headpiece was created in 1966?
@faron27 I disagree. I think that we need to find one so that we can protect them. But in a way I can see where your coming from, If we find them and let the world know where they live. People will want to be the first one to have a Bigfoot head an the wall.
I love this film clip. It makes me want this to be real so badly that I am turning from skeptic to groupie. If Patty ever does turn up (a very old woman by now), I hope she gets a cut of that cash Patterson got for this over the years. And everyone who doubted him has to apologize to the family and to Patty.
@eminboztepe JESUS! Shut the fuck up and stop being so god damn condescending. Just because someone believes something you don't, doesn't give you the right to be a total bitch about it. For someone who doesn't even believe this is real, you sure spend a lot of time watching this video and posting annoying comments. Go somewhere else, please. I get tired of seeing you post the same shit on this video every day.
@MondoBone Ya he definitely has an ego problem. He uses the identity of a marshall arts expert then comes on here criticizing other people for not being honest. What psych hospital is he in i wander, i think we should send the little sob flowers.
Show me plaster casts of ghost footprints, tell me why all ghost storys dont share same psyhical characteristic like big foot encounters.We dont hawe fossil records of ghost , but we know as a fact that not so far ago there where different humanoid species living all over this planet that would look exacly like bf.SHow me ghost movie from 60s that cant be disprove like patterson footage.Its arrogance to think that we know all stuf when actually we know jack sh1t
Fossil records of ghosts? Of course not. But you can google plenty of photos that haven't been debunked, at least in the minds of the believers. Footprints can be easily faked. Look at the PGF. We see Roger pouring plaster into the "Patty" footprints and he has plaster all over his jeans. The plaster suddenly disappears when he is shown holding the casts. Explain that. The film is a hoax. It HAS been debunked. But for some of you no proof is enough, just like those ghost pics
night vision and heat pattern are the newest scams--no costume is even needed! And bigfooters are still gullible enough to fall for it.I'm guessing that guys like moneymaker and meldrum don't believe in bigfoot because they've both been caught in hoaxes. Why the need for all these hoaxes if this thing is real?
The ones who make money convince other bigfooters to buy their books and dvds.biscardi has a website where he sells all sorts of tacky bigfoot crap. Meldrum will even sell you an autographed bigfoot plaster foot print.
LOL I wish I was a full time bigfoot hunter lol how do people get away with that as a job when you FAIL on a daily basis? Are there santa hunters, tooth fairy hunters and easter bunny hunters as well?
2 points Rockstar---you said "wait". Good one. All we do is wait on bigfoot evidence that just never seems to come. And you said don't trust the internet---well 95% of Bigfooter info guys like you puke out is lame disproven anecdotal stories or blurry photos and vid from the internet.
Yes look that up and read a bit about Ketchums scam. It seems she was given a bigfoot "steak" by a guy who claimed to have killed one and cut the meat out. That's what she did her dNA on. Why didn't the guy bring the whole body? You'd leave a bigfoot behind if u shot one?how does ketchum say its bigfoot when the Dna of bigfoot isn't known? Why hasn't her findings been published in a scholarly journal? Another boatload of BS!
@seymourbbest I would wait until the full story is out, since stuff on the internet, especially stories are not a good source of information. I'm sure that everyone agrees with that.
No use arguing this...those of us who have witnessed one of these magnificent beings know full well that Patty was a real creature. Everyone is entitled to their own belief and I would die to protect their right to believe and say what they will..however,I KNOW these creatures exist and that Patty was a perfect example of an adult female squatch. Peace fellas.
once again its a hoax...the so called herniated muscle can be duplicate easily...all I see is a big fat guy in a cheap suit...the guy came forward already claiming patterson owed him 1000 dollars if he would do this and be quit about it...but was never paid so he came clean...he was on the history channle 2 years ago....he,s 6'6 and has the same gate...the suit was taylord made tits and all for about 200 bucks
Within a year or 2 the olympic project is going to prove the existence of bigfoot and all the non-bliever are going to have egg on thier face. They have video that is 100 times better than the PG film and they have full DNA proof. Also they have something that is going to turn the world upside down with the media. Mark my words the shit is about to hit the fan.
I've seen this clip many times in my life. And every time i watch it i can clearly see the muscle movements of the animal. I do believe there is something out there. Were finding new species of animals and animals we thought went extinct all the time. So why not an unknown ape? Europeans didnt believe mountain gorilla's existed till they shot one....
By the way, numerous "experts" over the years have said that "Patty" is 6'1 to 8'2 feet tall. Until you guys get your act together, I'll go with 6'4. Hey, that's what your hero / con artist Roger Patterson said, right? Take it up with him.
You haven't refuted a single thing presented in my video yet. I'm still waiting. I mean, seriously, do you REALLY believe that a man with Hollywood F/X connections just happens to film a bigfoot after his real movie ran out of funds, and that the very bigfoot in qustion just happens to have bizarre characteristics that coincide with suits of that era? And a mask from that era as well? Can you say, "gullible?" LOL
Wrong on everything, as always. The pictures were from Jeff Pruitt, I credited him in the video description. He was banned from the BFRO because he proved the film was fake. Jeff is a stuntman that has worked in Hollywood for many years. Look him up on the IMDB. He found the Wah mask because he has friends that worked with John Chambers, who made the suit along with Prohaska. The mask looks identical to Patty because it IS the mask they used in 1967.
Uh...I wasn't making a music video, just an informative one. Sorry that all you kids are interested in today is goofy videos with rap music. Read a book for a change. Start with Greg Long's, "The Making of Bigfoot".
There is also a reason why Bob Gimlin refuses to take a polygraph. It is because he would fail it. There is a reason why Bob Heironimus had no problem taking two polygraph tests....because he knew he was telling the truth.
Roger Patterson never took a polygraph. That rumor has been debunked already. And Bob H. is about 6'1. With the Wah headpiece he is about 6'4 to 6'5. So, he DOES meet the height requirement.
I already listed the facts. Bob H. said he didn't know where the suit came from. He only knows what he was told. You can try to spin that all you want, but those are the facts.
The real liars are Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson, who both have criminal records and a history of lying.
So why bobs reconstruction of suit looks so crappy? Why its not even close to pgf ?Why CNN(30 years later) couldnt make suit that would looks like PGF?Why more than 40 thausands of ppl would made fake reports to police about encountering big foot ?Why so many ppl passed polygraph test after big foot sighting? Why all tribes in north america had so many big foot storys?Why would they made up more than 100 names to describe creature that would not even exist... open your eyes QQ
We have been over this. The suit that Bob wore recently was made by Morris. He said himself that the suit he wore 40 years ago was different. Bob's suit came from Jerry Merritt's buddy Janos Prohaska. Go argue with Morris about it.
Yes, open your eyes. I know the truth hurts, but it's a suit. Just because it is fake doesn't mean your silly bigfoot doesn't exist.
Solo---youre talking about insects and bacteria etc. There's no mammals left to be discovered in the uSa especially a giant 700 biped primate.
seymourbbest 1 week ago
no way this is a suit ,and if it is its the best suit ever,,def real,, look at the crap suits in planet of the apes made a yr after this ,if patterson made this hes the man at making costumes ,,,,no question real
madbluntz42069 1 week ago in playlist Favorite videos
i totally agree with,,,solo778083
madbluntz42069 1 week ago
People are dumb that say its not real, it may be a hoax but the reasons why people say its a hoax, is dumb.... You guys need to remember this is the freaking 1960's! Now if this video was made in 2012 then yes, you could argue its fake and a good costume, and a costume like this and how easily that creature is walking, would b impossible during the 60's. Gorillas werent confirmed till the 1920's so maybe this is an American Gorilla, experts say about 85-90% of living organisms have yet been dis
Solo778083 1 week ago
Real
beckyjodavenport 1 week ago
Real, next question!
Allanlegacy43 1 week ago
@Allanlegacy43
Fake, next question!
eminboztepe 1 week ago
FAKE. lol this is so fake. you can even see the human eyes. and a creature that we have never seen before would not walk away so caimly after looking DIRECTLY at you, it'd either run after you cand attack you, or run away. just some guys wanting attention. and of course he'd lie and say it's real, would you want the whole world to know you lied about some thing like this? everyone would hate you.
TheCBluver143 1 week ago
@TheCBluver143
Yes, obvious fake. Man in a bad fur suit.
eminboztepe 1 week ago
Just a hairy tall bodybuilder back in the 60's... too much steroid...side effect.
carlsonho 2 weeks ago
1st, The person who made the costume just make the skin first then add the fur on later this explains that you can see the quadriceps, and it might not be damage muscle but a damaged suit.2 Its a suit, u can hang the shoulder length, my uncle uses football pads and or special effect stuffing to make costumes shoulders bigger.3 the reason why i cant be duplicated is because when someone puts a lot of time and effort into something, then its hard to make an exact copy of that thing.0 characters -
markmarymark 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
MrHokeykokey 3 weeks ago
There is more proof that this is an undiscovered creature. The people who don't believe in 'Bigfoot' are the sheep type who are scared to think outside the tiny box they live in: "What will my friends think of me?" Even if you're the minority of one, the truth is still the truth. So even if the majority don't believe in Bigfoot, that doesn't mean it doesn't exist. Statistics mean nothing regarding truth. One time ago, most people didn't believe the Earth was round.
UpTubes 3 weeks ago
@UpTubes NO the people who don't believe are rational people who believe that there should be proof, if you are going to make a claim that something exists or not.Even if you give the absence of proof is not proof of absence argument, you still cant say that is film is proof because you can so clearly debunk this.
markmarymark 2 weeks ago
Don't worry marah---no one will ever hurt a bigfoot....or a lephrachaun.... or a unicorn ...or the easter bunny.
seymourbbest 3 weeks ago
Still remember seeing this as a kid in the 70's, whew!! The head turn w/shoulders in tow is another fact, gorillas do that too. A person in a suit would just turn their head, like many do in movies/shows. because ah, we can, ha ha. I feel these guys are more intelligent/in touch w/surroundings than we know, which is one reason it's been tough catch 'em. Watch Bigfoot Lives on Netfix, great movie for almost free! Thanx for the info/clip!!!
dougeroonie 3 weeks ago
@dougeroonie
Nope. When you wear a tighting fitting suit like that you have to turn your whole body to maintain visual alignment, just like what you see in the film.
eminboztepe 2 weeks ago
I believe sasquatch is real. I believe the Patterson/Gimlin film is real. Why not? Why is it so hard to accept the concept of Bigfoot? Patty's haunting eyes and the way she walks, the whole thing. I have been doing my own research on Bigfoot for years. This film and others I have seen is enough evidence for me that it's real. I believe these animals are very real and they need to be protected. I also believe they are in danger of being extinct.
marah712 1 month ago
@marah712
Bigfoot may exist, but this film is fake for sure.
eminboztepe 3 weeks ago
Comment removed
marah712 1 month ago
You should see the complete movie. It has two bigfoots in it.
TheCalifornian 1 month ago
Yes exactly the suit has been recreated at least twice and they're exact matches but bigfooters lie and deny it just like they do about everything else.
seymourbbest 1 month ago
you might take a look at Deefoots video, it has all the evidence to back up the costume in the first 6 seconds, because it has been recreated. Everyone uses the comment why hasnt someone? or why hasnt it...well it has , no one chooses to do the research. It is my hopes that Deefoot shows more of the creation
FindBigfoot 1 month ago
Apparently bigfooters don't like to think about the people who peddle the bigfoot myth doing it for money. Bigfooters always deny the money aspect but its the ONLY reason the bigfoot myth still continues.
seymourbbest 1 month ago
Dodge #498 komodidiot.
And by the way, Al DeAtley DOES live in a huge mansion. He even had it custom made.
Iidiot.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
If Al DeAtlas made millions on the PGF, news to me and rest of the world, then what's he doing sitting in Yakima still and not in some Bel Air mansion? lol You're full of tall rumor stories, eminbozo, that's all your are and it makes you the most easy sucker and gullible geek ever here. So watch your tongue who you call geeks in the future, eh, they don't come any bigger than you and your obsessive wrong babble.
reclaimerReclaimer 1 month ago
''The appearance of muscle mass displayed in the film has not yet been matched by a costume in the entertainment industry '' One sentence that all Bigfoot non believers cannot dispute. because they know its 100% FACT, instead they choose to ignore it, and waffle on about Bob Heironimus ,Chambers. Whatever ! . The day rumors stand up in an argument will be the day i start watching desperate housewives . End of story
suitsyouDesign64 1 month ago
@suitsyouDesign64
More babble. Your statement was pulled out of the air. It isn't a "fact". It's just more garbage spewed out by the Patty geeks.
End of story.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
@eminboztepe Just Because he knows bob H means F**** all to me it proves nothing.
I'm aware they were taped I have heard them myself I'm talking about the way he runs Patterson into the ground with he is a ' con man ' and liar attitude. He never said one positive about him yet jumps up in excitement at Bob .H's claim why ? ,
AL DeAtley is a greedy pig that is why he said it's fake to get more money from it because he spent his Share, it's the perfect thing to do.
suitsyouDesign64 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@eminboztepe Just Because he knows bob H means F all to me it proves nothing.
I'm aware they were taped I have heard them myself I'm talking about the way he runs Patterson into the ground with he is a ' con man ' and liar attitude. He never said one positive about him yet jumps up in excitement at Bob .H's claim why ? ,
AL DeAtley is a greedy pig that is why he said it's fake to get more money from it because he spent his Share, it's the perfect thing to do.
suitsyouDesign64 1 month ago
@eminboztepe You can sit here and call me a lier and Fraud till the cows come home, It's Not gonna make me shut up. Freedom of speech :D If you don't Like what i say Don't reply
END OF STORY .
suitsyouDesign64 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@suitsyouDesign64
Just calling it as I see it.
END OF STORY.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
this is authentic evidence. if you look online, there are comparisons but when you compare a attempt to replicate and the real film, the patty film is different then a man in a suit. also, we know chimpanzees exist from only bones of captive specimens and an extinct 10 foot tall ape from a jaw and teeth, so why cant Bigfoot be real?
JDeO1997 1 month ago
Never found bear bones? Haha damn that's a dumb statement even for a bigfooter! Mom and dad related no doubt.
seymourbbest 2 months ago
You can actually see detailed anatomy which would be covered up by a suite. That tells me this is real.
Fishqueen1972 2 months ago
BIgfoot has been determined to be a Bipedal Hominid, and MUST be quite intelligent to go undetected........look how the "little people of Flores" were only JUST QUITE RECENTLY found out! Evolution is not yet completely understood...Edgar Caycee mentioned these various humans....giants & little tiny people.
Cynbad1957 2 months ago
@Cynbad1957
LOL!
eminboztepe 2 months ago
@eminboztepe You can laugh, or get an education on this....its up 2 you...remember they laughed at the idea of the Earth not really being Flat..."The little People of Flores" is well documented , you can laugh @ me...or just google it then sit back and watch Nova, w/ the Archeologist reports...let me know if you need help..
Cynbad1957 2 months ago
@Cynbad1957
More LOL!
eminboztepe 2 months ago
Patterson / Gimlin Bigfoot Film look at this vid shows everything you are saying is not real and fake.
blackstersherron 2 months ago
@blackstersherron The bigfoot sasquatch evidence video pretty much sums everything up about sasquatch.
rockstarzep 2 months ago
@rockstarzep So bob h who came forward and told it was him wearing the outfit is lying also huh? He took a polygraph that was televised it he passed the test, but im sure you will still say he is lying. Sorry but this is not real, i seen all the vids and all of them is fake, there is no proof they ever existed,.
blackstersherron 2 months ago
@blackstersherron I still stand by the above comment.
rockstarzep 2 months ago
@rockstarzep Have you seen the vid "Patterson / Gimlin: The final word" ? No way can you watch that and still believe the patterson film is still real, and there is also a vid showing all the flaws in the suit, after watching these 2 vids, and never been shown a body or bones, its easy to know its fake. Just a bunch of people making money off a myth, i just don't and will not believe it until there is proof.
blackstersherron 2 months ago
@blackstersherron I see a scared to death Bob and a host who wants fame and fortune for supposedly exposing a myth on her boss' show.
rockstarzep 2 months ago
@blackstersherron They've never found the bones of a bear so I guess they don't exist either then.
MrGregster17 2 months ago
@MrGregster17 How dumb are you my friend, we have seen bears, at the zoo, there have been dead bodies of bears found, and we are able to study bears and learn about them when captured, but not big foot. Nothing but fake foot prints, and vids, no body, no bones, nothing ever found to show that it's real and not a hoax, like aliens, loch ness monster means not real, so there is no big foot.
blackstersherron 2 months ago
@blackstersherron Just because they haven't found one yet doesn't mean they don't exist. Don't call me dumb. Were you there in 1967? If not then don't comment. Watch the Bill Munn analysis of the film. I'd rather beleive him then somebody with no credentials.
MrGregster17 2 months ago
@MrGregster17
You know who was there in 1967? The man who financed the film. The man who was Roger's brother in law. The man who used the film to get his paving company out of the red.
The man: Al DeAtley. He said the film was hoax.
Thanks for playing.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
@eminboztepe Al DeAtley the same man that was annoyed because they didn't pay him as much as he wanted ? it's probably why he is saying its a hoax now ... wasn't that just a rumor anyway ? Have you been reading that Greg long's book what a crock of shit that was !. You do know a lot of that stuff in that book was proven to be lies and a lot of these so called interviews never actually happened !
suitsyouDesign64 1 month ago
@suitsyouDesign64
You are full of crap. Al DeAtley financed the film and made millions off it. All conversations in Greg Long's book were taped recorded. No one ever sued him for libel, slander, nothing.
You are have exposed yourself for being a liar and a fraud at this point.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
@eminboztepe As it stands I can think of at least 5 people right now who have "admitted" to being bigfoot. At the very least, 4 out of those 5 people are obviously wackos, which leads us to the very real chance that 5 out of 5 are.
suitsyouDesign64 1 month ago
@suitsyouDesign64
Yaw. Bob Heironimus is in reel two of the film. Bob Heironimus personally KNEW Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson. He is not just some random guy that came out and said, "Hey, I was the one who wore the costume."
dork.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
Comment removed
blackstersherron 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Dr. Melba Ketchum update: I thought we would be finished in a few weeks, but instead, Sasquatch threw us curve balls even with their DNA which can be as elusive as they are.We are past that! As a result, we have assembled a renowned team, each of us with our own specialties to make this project "extraordinary".If everyone will hang in there, I promise it will be worth the wait. We have the proof, now just give us the opportunity to present it in a form that will even convince skeptics.
rockstarzep 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
There she goes again with the wa chang mask bullshit..remember emin does that mean jon cotner is elvis ? silly sausage..go to emins page , but dont disagree with her or youre banned ha ha also take note at the number of people that have clicked "liked"..was zero a few mins ago... haha fuckin wa chang ? looks like albert steptoe.. "haaaaaaarrrolllllld
Jrld11 2 months ago
The Wah mask is proof that it is fake. Still blows me away that Jeff found it after all these years by talking to the right people.
eminboztepe 2 months ago
I keep an open mind. I see both problem and evidence in the PGF. Its fascinating to me that after 44 years this piece of film is still such a controversy. If it was just cowboys making a hookey film, they did a helluva job.
MrTamimisa 3 months ago
"Skeptics" don't have to present compelling arguments against the pG film. Those saying its real must prove it. In 44 years they haven't.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
Go ahead and disable comments. Plenty of other identical videos to discuss on.
agreen123 3 months ago
Skeptics of the PG film don't ever present any compelling arguments.
VitalSigns1 3 months ago
Yep mermaids must be real. Ancient mariners had a legend of mermaids so there you go.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
So where is the scientific validation that a footprint can be used to get the height of the creature who made it? There is none-its made up bullsh1t. Can u figure the height of a giraffe from its print? NO! Patterson said his creature was a shade over 6 ft. So he was lying?
seymourbbest 3 months ago
If the footprints are 14.5 inches, you can actually estimate the height of the bigfoot (see 1:49 of bigfoot sasquatch evidence video) by proportion to be 14.5 x 6 = 87 inches = 7'3". Even Seemorebutts can do that.
rockstarzep 3 months ago
Comment removed
blackstersherron 2 months ago
I wish Mermaids with big boobies existed. I know they don't but I'm still a romantic.
seymourbbest 3 months ago
You ask what else the lump in the leg could be. Surely it could be almost anything left in the pocket of the suit wearer? The only thing that seems clear to me is that the video is too unclear to say anything menaingful about it. I'm not sure about the distance stuff, but making a suit with raised shoulders woudl be a piece of cake. The BBC reconstruction looks nothing like the patterson film, but it looks like a more convincing bipedal ape.
KennyTew2 3 months ago
@KennyTew2
That's because the BBC wasn't trying to replicate the suit. Why this absurd rumor persists is beyond me.
John Vulich simply grabbed a red ape suit from Optic Nerve that they had hanging up in their shop. No one was trying to duplicate anything. The BBC didn't think that the suit in the PGF was red with black hands and feet.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
big foot is real! tim peeler from cleveland county can confirm that! :)
caste2510 3 months ago
Awesome video, i also think that the footage is Authentic. Great Post to show the proof ;)
louisNero666 4 months ago
The feet have no toes and the arch is wrong on the right foot. It looks like this costume had two left feet.
kpatterson1013 4 months ago
filmed or photos... where is a suit like this? If John Chambers was the best in fx at that time and we saw his best work that won the Oscar for it in Planet of the Apes. You have 68 Years to find one example better... and maybe in total of 150 years of photography. Find one as good as the Bigfoot Suit. Full Body Suit.. with muscles, boobs, etc. We saw the BBC's 1967 version with 1967 materials on their special made about a decade ag and it looked NOTHING like it! Where were the muscles?boobs?
lucky44124 5 months ago
@lucky44124
Actually John Chambers put the suit together. The BBC never tried to replicate the suit either. John Vulich grabbed a red ape suit from Optic Nerve per the producer's idea to see what it would look like when shot with a simliar camera. Why this myth continues to survive is beyond me.
It's a bad fur suit. That's why it was shot blurry and out of focus. See my youtube video for details and pictures of the suit parts they used.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@eminboztepe I just watched would say your best angle/evidence is the mask! That is good work by you or whoever did it! But the body of the suit isnt close... I see where your going with it, and your trying to piece together something to explain that... even in the star trek episode it looks bad, Planet of the Apes they hid the bodies because they couldnt make something that worked. But ill say 90% of your angle which makes anyone think is the face! Thats good work on your part! Im honest
lucky44124 5 months ago
@lucky44124
I don't have any pictures of the body they used to build Patty. Jeff Pruitt does, though. It was from a bear costume that Prohaska modified.
By the way, the mask was originally by Buck Maffei for a Star Trek episode. By some strange coincidence, he also worked at the same rodeo as Roger (Corriganville).
Thanks for watching.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@eminboztepe if pruitt has concrete proof of a hoax why doesnt he go public whith it,some documentary would pay him decent money to expose the hoax,wouldnt they? this is all he said she said,the only way to prove its a hoax is for gimlin to say it or pat patterson saying roger told her it was a fake.
SuperTestfreak 3 months ago
@SuperTestfreak
You seem to be under the strange impression that the general public out there knows about this film and thinks it is real. The fact is that few people know about this film and the ones that do say it is a man in a suit. No documentary would make any money off saying it is fake, since no one thinks it is real to start with.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe you are 100% right ,most people have no idea what the pg film is, and most who have seen it think its a fake. i was always aware of this fact,but some who give the film a chance and take a good look at it think it could be real.
SuperTestfreak 3 months ago
@SuperTestfreak
The only one that I know that thinks it is real is Meldrum. Haven't you ever noticed that he is on EVERY bigfoot show? Why is that? It is because they can't find anyone else.
Meldrum also said the Snow Walker footage was real too. He was wrong. He said the Memorial Day Footage was real. He was wrong again. And the PGF? Fake too, though he won't admit it.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe i think meldrum is a weird guy,he puts out some strange mormon books and was fooled by the m.day footage and snowalker,i thought snowalker looked pretty good for a hoax,more than meldrum say pg film is real on some tv specials,forgive my spelling on some of these guys,grover krantz,john bindernagel,christopher murphy,loren coleman,john green,rene dahinden,peter byrne.
SuperTestfreak 3 months ago
@SuperTestfreak
Some of those people you mentioned are dead.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe yes they are lol, i put them down because i heard them back the film in tv specials from years past, so it is and was more than just meldrum, you said meldrum wont admit pg film is a hoax,are you saying meldrum does think its fake but wont say it because he is in to deep?
SuperTestfreak 3 months ago
@SuperTestfreak
Not sure. He certainly has a financial stake in it (he sells "casts" and the like for money).
Even Jane Goodall has recetly disassociated herself with bigfoot. But yes, all the old "bigfooters" are dead. There really isn't anyone today with any real credibility that thinks the film is real.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe when did jane goodhall make a anti bigfoot statement? i wasnt aware of it
SuperTestfreak 3 months ago
@SuperTestfreak Jane Goodhall doesn't want to say clearly whether she believes or not. She didn't say no, and disassociate herself, that is out of context. She probably hasn't studied it enough to commit to an opinion. She joked that she would love to believe it, but didn't elaborate due to being misquoted, or mislabeled as a definate believe or something. That's what I heard, but you should always do independent research and not listen to anyone in particular.
rockstarzep 3 months ago
@SuperTestfreak
On her website. Jane says that she has not done any bigfoot research. In an interview a few years ago, she that bigfoot may not exist. She also said that she WANTED for them to exist because she "is a romantic".
And yet the bigfoot nerds continue to quote her. Of course, due to the law of large numbers, there will ALWAYS be SOMEONE who believes in something for the fans to quote, whether it be bigfoot, ghosts, fake moon landings, etc.
eminboztepe 3 months ago
@eminboztepe Do ALLOT more work/research on the Body with examples in some other movies or something to prove more your point of piece parting a suit seperate... then you might have something! If Hollywood couldnt do a full body suit and not a tight body suit where muscles read under the fur/clothe... these guys wouldnt be able too! But good job on the Face Angle. Keep working on it though!
lucky44124 5 months ago
Movies have a bigger budget then a 1968 Nature Documentary.. why wasnt there a better example of a "monkey suit" in a movie back then? Name the movie where a suit is this good from 1968 - 1900 when filming and movies started
lucky44124 5 months ago
@lucky44124
First name one movie that is shot in blurry Kodachrome film of an object 30 yards away and out of focus like this one.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Get the book "Ash Gray: Stay out of the Rockies!"
Excellent thriller novel about this monster!
ISBN: 9781463430627
Available at Authorhouse website
Barnes & Noble
Amazon
SuperJohnnybandit 5 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Fredy---rest easy. I personally guarantee you that no one will ever have a bigfoot head on their wall.
seymourbbest 5 months ago
As a rational minded person, I can honestly say that this is an unsolved mystery and will probably never be solved. The people who claim with absolute certainty that this was just a hoax are just as closed minded and deluded as anyone who would claim with absolute certainty that this was a real fliming of a sasquatch.
VitalSigns1 5 months ago
@VitalSigns1
I disagree. It is flat out impossible that Roger just happened to film a bigfoot who has a face that perfectly matches a headpiece that was made by a business associate of his during the year prior, AND that very same headpiece was worn by someone Roger worked with at the same rodeo.
Anyone who claims coincidence is simply deluding themselves.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@eminboztepe Actually that headpiece is not an exact match at all. Look at how much wider the nose is, and look at how far down the eyebrows are and note their pointed shape. It's close, but it's not exact.
VitalSigns1 5 months ago
@VitalSigns1
Actually it is an exact match. Computer overlays have sealed the deal on this. Even Bill Munns admits this.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@eminboztepe The nose is definitely wider. It's close, but not an exact match.
VitalSigns1 5 months ago
@VitalSigns1
Wrong. The nose matches perfectly. Computer overlays have already proven this. You can't argue against this, sorry.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@eminboztepe Computers have also said that no human can match the gait of Patty. GTFO with your incessant bullshit. You're so "matter of fact", like there's just NO WAY your point can be argued.
MondoBone 5 months ago
@MondoBone
You're full of shit as always, Mondobone. Show me what computer said this.
Idiot.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@MondoBone
Anyone can do the walk. Watched a guy in a studio do it perfect after just a few tries. When you're wearing big fake feet it's natural to step like that. Look at the ass.....it's a ass pad folks. It's not even a good one, it's deformed looking. I saw a good still of it when it turns and on one of the arms, you could see on the forearm that the suit was all bunched up. It's fake ya'll....Bigfoot is real, but this is not it, it's just Bob.
longtalltexan63 5 months ago
@eminboztepe The nose is clearly wider, and you don't have a good enough of a shot of Patterson's face to say that it's an exact match. The hair covering his face makes it too hard to tell if it matches. But the nose is clearly much wider and by the way where's the copyright or proof that your headpiece was created in 1966?
VitalSigns1 5 months ago
@VitalSigns1
The nose is an exact match. I've seen the computer overlays, so I'm not going to argue with you on this. Take up with Jeff Pruitt and the software.
eminboztepe 5 months ago
@eminboztepe I would if I knew how to contact him
VitalSigns1 5 months ago
@VitalSigns1
Deefoot on youtube. Search for "quick look at patterson bigfoot"
eminboztepe 5 months ago
very nice video, imagine an animal of the same if not greater Intelligence than man.
There have been many animals discovered from tells of tribal peoples and that are supposed to be extinct WHY NOT BIG FOOT?
I hope humanity never finds them, for if we did they would surely die!
faron27 6 months ago
@faron27 I disagree. I think that we need to find one so that we can protect them. But in a way I can see where your coming from, If we find them and let the world know where they live. People will want to be the first one to have a Bigfoot head an the wall.
FredyK200 5 months ago
I love this film clip. It makes me want this to be real so badly that I am turning from skeptic to groupie. If Patty ever does turn up (a very old woman by now), I hope she gets a cut of that cash Patterson got for this over the years. And everyone who doubted him has to apologize to the family and to Patty.
IAmTheEvilMonkey 6 months ago
@OregonCheetah3
Thousands of people have reported seeing "ghosts" too. But they don't exist either. Any of this sinking in yet?
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@eminboztepe JESUS! Shut the fuck up and stop being so god damn condescending. Just because someone believes something you don't, doesn't give you the right to be a total bitch about it. For someone who doesn't even believe this is real, you sure spend a lot of time watching this video and posting annoying comments. Go somewhere else, please. I get tired of seeing you post the same shit on this video every day.
MondoBone 6 months ago
@MondoBone
Yawn. POT-KETTLE-BLACK
Let me know when you find "Patty", ok? LOL
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@MondoBone Ya he definitely has an ego problem. He uses the identity of a marshall arts expert then comes on here criticizing other people for not being honest. What psych hospital is he in i wander, i think we should send the little sob flowers.
corsairzf2g 6 months ago
@corsairzf2g
What's a "marshall" arts expert?
LOL...you sure sound educated!
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@eminboztepe
Show me plaster casts of ghost footprints, tell me why all ghost storys dont share same psyhical characteristic like big foot encounters.We dont hawe fossil records of ghost , but we know as a fact that not so far ago there where different humanoid species living all over this planet that would look exacly like bf.SHow me ghost movie from 60s that cant be disprove like patterson footage.Its arrogance to think that we know all stuf when actually we know jack sh1t
Swiati 6 months ago
@Swiati
Fossil records of ghosts? Of course not. But you can google plenty of photos that haven't been debunked, at least in the minds of the believers. Footprints can be easily faked. Look at the PGF. We see Roger pouring plaster into the "Patty" footprints and he has plaster all over his jeans. The plaster suddenly disappears when he is shown holding the casts. Explain that. The film is a hoax. It HAS been debunked. But for some of you no proof is enough, just like those ghost pics
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@eminboztepe
Clearly i will never convince u and u will never convince me.But u said something verry smart
For some ppl proofs are not enough.
Swiati 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@Swiati
Well, at least we agree on something!
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@OregonCheetah3
Might as well ask, how do you know that the Toothfairy does not exist?
LOL
eminboztepe 6 months ago
No proof of Bigfoot will occur. Bigfoot doesn't exist.
seymourbbest 6 months ago
night vision and heat pattern are the newest scams--no costume is even needed! And bigfooters are still gullible enough to fall for it.I'm guessing that guys like moneymaker and meldrum don't believe in bigfoot because they've both been caught in hoaxes. Why the need for all these hoaxes if this thing is real?
seymourbbest 6 months ago
@seymourbbest When they do get proof you guys are going to be the ones licking egg off each others faces. maybe they should charge to see that.
corsairzf2g 6 months ago
Bigfoot is laughing at the comment below and arguing whether or not humans exist with other bigfoots.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
The ones who make money convince other bigfooters to buy their books and dvds.biscardi has a website where he sells all sorts of tacky bigfoot crap. Meldrum will even sell you an autographed bigfoot plaster foot print.
seymourbbest 6 months ago
LOL I wish I was a full time bigfoot hunter lol how do people get away with that as a job when you FAIL on a daily basis? Are there santa hunters, tooth fairy hunters and easter bunny hunters as well?
xxxTrunks 6 months ago
If bigfoot bodychecked Hodgson @1:21, I wonder how far he would fly?
rockstarzep 6 months ago
Great video man. Yeahh I believe it was real, I think there's plenty of things out there we don't know about, I just wish we did..!
FDLOFFICIAL 6 months ago
2 points Rockstar---you said "wait". Good one. All we do is wait on bigfoot evidence that just never seems to come. And you said don't trust the internet---well 95% of Bigfooter info guys like you puke out is lame disproven anecdotal stories or blurry photos and vid from the internet.
seymourbbest 6 months ago
Yes look that up and read a bit about Ketchums scam. It seems she was given a bigfoot "steak" by a guy who claimed to have killed one and cut the meat out. That's what she did her dNA on. Why didn't the guy bring the whole body? You'd leave a bigfoot behind if u shot one?how does ketchum say its bigfoot when the Dna of bigfoot isn't known? Why hasn't her findings been published in a scholarly journal? Another boatload of BS!
seymourbbest 6 months ago
@seymourbbest I would wait until the full story is out, since stuff on the internet, especially stories are not a good source of information. I'm sure that everyone agrees with that.
rockstarzep 6 months ago
That's Smokey The Bear going to put out a forest fire.
iamIegion 6 months ago
MAYBE THERE'S SOMETHING OUT THERE? TIME WILL TELL!!
toopoogang 6 months ago
@toopoogang Time is slipping away, LOL. They said this in the 1960s.
cochranexyz 6 months ago
Funny how Pattys face turns up in an episode of Star Trek if it isn't a mask aint it?
seymourbbest 6 months ago
No use arguing this...those of us who have witnessed one of these magnificent beings know full well that Patty was a real creature. Everyone is entitled to their own belief and I would die to protect their right to believe and say what they will..however,I KNOW these creatures exist and that Patty was a perfect example of an adult female squatch. Peace fellas.
Methadone4Life 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
now this is creepy music!
TheGhostface979 6 months ago
once again its a hoax...the so called herniated muscle can be duplicate easily...all I see is a big fat guy in a cheap suit...the guy came forward already claiming patterson owed him 1000 dollars if he would do this and be quit about it...but was never paid so he came clean...he was on the history channle 2 years ago....he,s 6'6 and has the same gate...the suit was taylord made tits and all for about 200 bucks
bozo47p 6 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Within a year or 2 the olympic project is going to prove the existence of bigfoot and all the non-bliever are going to have egg on thier face. They have video that is 100 times better than the PG film and they have full DNA proof. Also they have something that is going to turn the world upside down with the media. Mark my words the shit is about to hit the fan.
husky500cr 6 months ago
@husky500cr What do you mean? Please respond back. Thanks.
DashingKardashianTV 6 months ago
@DashingKardashianTV
Look this up in google.
Melba Ketchum 2011 Bigfoot DNA Study
and click on the first link which should be Oregon bigfoot blog
husky500cr 6 months ago
Very compelling video and one of the finest uses of accompanying music ever.
citizen245 6 months ago
Al DeAtley said the Patterson film was a hoax.
Game over, thanks for playing.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
The Patterson film is legit. No costumes could have been made that sophisticated back in 1967.
VitalSigns1 6 months ago
Comment removed
FindBigfoot 6 months ago
I've seen this clip many times in my life. And every time i watch it i can clearly see the muscle movements of the animal. I do believe there is something out there. Were finding new species of animals and animals we thought went extinct all the time. So why not an unknown ape? Europeans didnt believe mountain gorilla's existed till they shot one....
Spark8604 6 months ago
@Spark8604
Watch my youtube video and you will for the first time in your life see the headpiece they used to build the costume.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
By the way, numerous "experts" over the years have said that "Patty" is 6'1 to 8'2 feet tall. Until you guys get your act together, I'll go with 6'4. Hey, that's what your hero / con artist Roger Patterson said, right? Take it up with him.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
You haven't refuted a single thing presented in my video yet. I'm still waiting. I mean, seriously, do you REALLY believe that a man with Hollywood F/X connections just happens to film a bigfoot after his real movie ran out of funds, and that the very bigfoot in qustion just happens to have bizarre characteristics that coincide with suits of that era? And a mask from that era as well? Can you say, "gullible?" LOL
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
Wrong on everything, as always. The pictures were from Jeff Pruitt, I credited him in the video description. He was banned from the BFRO because he proved the film was fake. Jeff is a stuntman that has worked in Hollywood for many years. Look him up on the IMDB. He found the Wah mask because he has friends that worked with John Chambers, who made the suit along with Prohaska. The mask looks identical to Patty because it IS the mask they used in 1967.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@mr5jr
And you STILL haven't refuted anything in the video yet. I'm still waiting.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
Uh...I wasn't making a music video, just an informative one. Sorry that all you kids are interested in today is goofy videos with rap music. Read a book for a change. Start with Greg Long's, "The Making of Bigfoot".
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
Comment removed
BattousaiTS 6 months ago
@BattousaiTS
No one is talking to you, geek.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
BattousaiTS 6 months ago
Explanations by the bigfoot geeks regarding the Wah mask:
1. No such mask ever existed, the photo of it is actually a hoax.
2. The mask was made AFTER the PGF was filmed and modeled after "Patty".
3. Wah Ming Chang was a "psychic" and made the mask based on a vision he had of "Patty".
LOL! I'll post more goofy "explanations" as they become available. What a load of crap. You bigfoot geeks crack me up!
eminboztepe 7 months ago
There is also a reason why Bob Gimlin refuses to take a polygraph. It is because he would fail it. There is a reason why Bob Heironimus had no problem taking two polygraph tests....because he knew he was telling the truth.
eminboztepe 7 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
Roger Patterson never took a polygraph. That rumor has been debunked already. And Bob H. is about 6'1. With the Wah headpiece he is about 6'4 to 6'5. So, he DOES meet the height requirement.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
Not true. Roger Patterson said 6'4 himself. It is not 7 feet tall, where do you guys come up with this crap?
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
I already listed the facts. Bob H. said he didn't know where the suit came from. He only knows what he was told. You can try to spin that all you want, but those are the facts.
The real liars are Bob Gimlin and Roger Patterson, who both have criminal records and a history of lying.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
And yet if Bob H. failed those polygraphs I bet you would be putting that out with glee...
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago
@mr5jr
Bob H. is the perfect height and it was a suit, we have confessions by those involved.
End of discussion.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
@eminboztepe
So why bobs reconstruction of suit looks so crappy? Why its not even close to pgf ?Why CNN(30 years later) couldnt make suit that would looks like PGF?Why more than 40 thausands of ppl would made fake reports to police about encountering big foot ?Why so many ppl passed polygraph test after big foot sighting? Why all tribes in north america had so many big foot storys?Why would they made up more than 100 names to describe creature that would not even exist... open your eyes QQ
Swiati 6 months ago
@Swiati
We have been over this. The suit that Bob wore recently was made by Morris. He said himself that the suit he wore 40 years ago was different. Bob's suit came from Jerry Merritt's buddy Janos Prohaska. Go argue with Morris about it.
Yes, open your eyes. I know the truth hurts, but it's a suit. Just because it is fake doesn't mean your silly bigfoot doesn't exist.
eminboztepe 6 months ago
Comment removed
mr5jr 6 months ago