Added: 4 years ago
From: TheMarsSociety
Views: 3,014
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (34)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The Mars Society is brilliant!

    Check them out and become a member!

  • The amount of money wasted in the Iraq War in 2006 and 2007 could have funded a human landing on Mars fully. The total bribes received by Russian officials could almost pay for two. It is such a shame that the world is wasting money on things that are detrimental to Humanity, rather than spending it on things that could save it, like space colonisation.

  • The gravity on the ships could be generated through the constantly acceleration speeds and deacceleration speeds on the way to Mars.

  • @rbolo29 I don't know about that. In order to generate a significant gravitational force, the ship would have to accelerate in a straight line. If it continuously accelerated then decelerated at 1g in a straight line, it would reach Mars in 2-5 days. Obviously this is beyond our capabilities. Artificial gravity would be much easier generated by spinning the spacecraft.

  • Yes, it's a great dream and I've love to see it but in reality we don't have the technology to guarantee a safe passage and return. We need much faster propulsion systems and such. Robert Zubrin is both a genius and a crack pot in one I think.

  • @rbolo29

    "Yes, it's a great dream and I've love to see it but in reality we don't have the technology to guarantee a safe passage and return."

    Then maybe the solution is to make it a one-way trip. I suggest you check out "Mars to Stay" on Wikipedia.

  • Which is why you create a robust long term exploration plan with prolongued colonization. Then you promote private venture and eneterprize for true colonization... the same process that took place in colonizing America, less all the tribal genocide... of course.

  • It is more important to have safe transportation and be able to remain on the planet for decades, not to stay in space for decades. Mars Direct gives the opportunity for lightweight and cheap with maximum surface time and a guaranteed return vehicle.

    To build a multi-decade massive battlestar gallactica is definately not the first step... It would require great amounts of constant energy for simple propulsion - something that is not yet feasible.

  • There are already existing launch systems which can handle the non-human loads... heck, even humans could ride these high G rockets if not for NASA's tyrannical Human rating reqs.

    As for next generation rockets, the Jupiter concept would have been best, but Ares V is going to be successful - NASA needs to cancel Ares I and restructure the priority of the Space Program.

    Truly, we threw it all away with Saturn, and mis-used shuttle technology.

    We can still do it now, though...

  • Zero G issues resolved by artificial gravity by way of tether and counterbalance.

    Micrometeorites are a minor issue while not in a gravity well, but can be countered by modest lightweight composite material.

    Radiation surges can be resolved by a "safe-room" inside the innermost portion of the ship, protected by water supply.

    The trick is combining all the "needs" and still making it a lightweight and affordable mission.

  • Not really. We learned how to walk 50 years ago. We are talking about learning how to put on running shoes FOR the marathon, instead of practicing in steel toe boots.

    Which one makes more sense? a lighter, more efficient plan, or running 26 miles in steel toes?

  • Cosmic Radiation would not be a major issue so long as you adequately prepare with radiation shielding. Nothing is impossible. Simplest radiation shielding is a water barrier... water... no fancy new technology, just water.

    The problem with "myths" about space travel is that those myths are as common as urban legends, such as the one where Mars will be bigger and brighter than the full moon... The general public are so greatly uneducated about it that they will believe anything they hear.

  • Not really... we have the technology, we have the ability... the only problem is in the funding... every other aspect of the technology has been in existence for decades... read Zubrin's "Case for Mars"... it will change your entire outlook. It will give you the facts! We can do it now, for less!

  • Comment removed

  • Private enterprises could accomplish this in a third the time and more than likely at a fifth the price it would take a government funded project. As far as i could see it would probably cause far less political upheaval which is one aspect i haven't heard anyone address yet. You know the politicians will be tripping over each other to get piece of the pie =(

  • I totaly agree private enterprise is the only real hope right now.

  • Its kind of funny to think that NASA has only managed to only send humans some 380 pitiful miles away from the Earth; since 1972.

  • @newmac Yeah, what the heck have they been doing with taxpayer money since then?

  • @RevDarkehorse

    NASA's budget is a mere tiny fraction ... less than 1% of the overall federal budget. Whatever amount of taxpayer money NASA consumes is practically insignificant.

    As for what NASA does with it... NASA funds a lot of math & science related programs around America. It holds contests with prize money for people who come up with new ideas for improving technology in areas related to spacefaring technologies, among many other things.

    Among other things, NASA supports sci&tech progs

  • I thin it would be wiser to start with the moon first, not only is it closer, it also has helium 3 (Russia and China are planning on holding joint missions sometime in the 20's). There is allot of practical promise in this

  • The Moon is closer but has far less resources in which to establish a human presence. We should go to Mars first and then try to tackle the Moon.

  • Let's set the bar high. We can do it.

    Join the Mars Society.

  • Wow! The Mars Society has the right idea! Let's send Humans to Mars and inspire a whole new generation! The opportunities are endless!

    Check them out and become a member!

  • @Eisenmond To be fair it's actualy more like 385000 Kilometers, or approx 240k miles. :P

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more