'Virtually all communication is electronic...100 billion emails worldwide daily...they would completely fill five five story buildings...We at the institute realize the process can be subverted if the judges are not knowledgeable and attentive...'
Does the average judicial person consider this information so useful to the reform pursuit as to be worthy of inclusion in a youtube post? I think we already know there are a lot of emails and that judges need to be attentive etc.
In their publication '21st Century Civil Justice System' the IAALS concludes: 'It requires careful planning...careful gathering of data...and careful analysis of the data gathered... the problems facing the civil justice system are profound, and the solutions must be well thought-out and tested...
As a scientist trying to understand the judicial mind, are these conclusions considered worthy of publication? In science I think these would be considered too vacuous and obvious for publication.
Question to Kourlis: I have asked you or your staffers numerous times to respond to my transparency for chief judges directive proposal. Your staffers told me they weren't going to comment on it.
How about you? 'We must remake the system with a new commitment to openness, transparency, and accountability to those it serves'?
'Virtually all communication is electronic...100 billion emails worldwide daily...they would completely fill five five story buildings...We at the institute realize the process can be subverted if the judges are not knowledgeable and attentive...'
Does the average judicial person consider this information so useful to the reform pursuit as to be worthy of inclusion in a youtube post? I think we already know there are a lot of emails and that judges need to be attentive etc.
cowgirlradio22 1 month ago
In their publication '21st Century Civil Justice System' the IAALS concludes: 'It requires careful planning...careful gathering of data...and careful analysis of the data gathered... the problems facing the civil justice system are profound, and the solutions must be well thought-out and tested...
As a scientist trying to understand the judicial mind, are these conclusions considered worthy of publication? In science I think these would be considered too vacuous and obvious for publication.
cowgirlradio22 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Question to Kourlis: I have asked you or your staffers numerous times to respond to my transparency for chief judges directive proposal. Your staffers told me they weren't going to comment on it.
How about you? 'We must remake the system with a new commitment to openness, transparency, and accountability to those it serves'?
cowgirlradio22 3 months ago
Comment removed
psychcowboy1 1 year ago
Comment removed
psychcowboy1 1 year ago
Comment removed
psychcowboy1 1 year ago
Comment removed
psychcowboy1 1 year ago