Added: 2 years ago
From: uofdenver
Views: 749
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (7)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • 'Virtually all communication is electronic...100 billion emails worldwide daily...they would completely fill five five story buildings...We at the institute realize the process can be subverted if the judges are not knowledgeable and attentive...'

    Does the average judicial person consider this information so useful to the reform pursuit as to be worthy of inclusion in a youtube post? I think we already know there are a lot of emails and that judges need to be attentive etc.

  • In their publication '21st Century Civil Justice System' the IAALS concludes: 'It requires careful planning...careful gathering of data...and careful analysis of the data gathered... the problems facing the civil justice system are profound, and the solutions must be well thought-out and tested...

    As a scientist trying to understand the judicial mind, are these conclusions considered worthy of publication? In science I think these would be considered too vacuous and obvious for publication.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more