Added: 10 months ago
From: valgidanmark2011
Views: 11,258
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (85)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Packerd01 I think I know little bit more about this matter than you do, my little green friend. I am one of those who has actaully had a REAL talk with her, gotten a picture with her standing next to me. And soon I will see her once again. And I do not recall, hearing of anyone getting killed by her, but it seems that Hitler killed more than 6 million. Which actually proves that your arguement is invalid. Konservatism and liberalism is only the way, if you wanna see a a nation get burried.

  • @Packerd01 Well then apperently it seems that you are the one here who's made a mistake, by sticking to those only thinking of tghem selfes. We are people, not animals, and people think of others than themselfes, but it seems that you are an exception. What would you do, if you were sick and dying, and I had the medicin for to cure you? If I were like you I would've just let you die, but luckily for me, then I am NOT a person of that kind. Think of others, instead of yourselfes.

  • Ud i køkkenet kælling....

  • fuck statsministeren fru helle thorning Danmark har ALDRIG haft en så skandale ramt statsminister der er heller ingen der har løjet så meget som hun har,hun skulle udskrive valg igen når hun ikke er værdig til sin stilling

  • Helle är sexig. Den snyggaste partiledare jag någonsin har sett. Grattis danskar för att ni har så vackra kvinnor, även om hon är socialdemokrat.

  • @Merrillmiller99

    Lol, yeah!

  • Alle børnene betalte skat, undtagen Helle, hun kunne ikke tælle :)

  • er det meningen at hun altid har sådanne nogle øjne som en heks? mørke, stikkende og døde? det er skræmmende på så mange måder.. og nå ja.. hva faen hun er vel meget sød... sød på en patetisk forræderisk ussel måde?.. =)

  • @Packerd01

    Face it. You don't have a leg to stand on, so you're crying to mommy that I'm not playing fair because you're losing the argument. And I'M the one that's pathetic and childish? I think I'm done here. Any more and I'll be accused of beating up the mentally handicapped for my amusement.

  • @Packerd01

    And now, for the coup de grace: proof that you bitched and moaned about a Socialdemokraterne led government:

    "Good job Danes(sarcasm) you have fucked your country up by voting for this bitch...and then you guys elect these cunts from red block, they will fuck Denmark up, increase the crime rate, support islamofacism and are anti democratic etc..."

    Too bad there are logs of what you've said, eh? TELL me I'm putting words in your mouth again. I dare you motherfucker.

  • @Packerd01

    You have said, quote:

    "countries need to set a good example like Venstre did these last years, wich are great, there were some ups and downs but they got trough it every time with succes."

    "Lying about everything, every socialist is a scumbag. Social-conservatism is something else that is an ideology that I can approve."

    "Nobody trusts them anymore, that's why even Schmidt lost a seat."

    Hear that? That's me proving that on top of being biased, you're a damn liar.

  • @Packerd01

    "I'm telling it like it is."

    Let's have a look at your rhetoric when it was applied a little closer to home, shall we? Remember when the Irish potato famine drove huge hordes of immigrants into New York Harbor? What was it that was said about that? How were German immigrants treated? The Chinese? The Japanese? Mexicans? Jews? The list goes on.

    You don't want to be affiliated with the guys who bullied the "damn Irish" for not integrating, do you? Then stop ACTING like them, damn it!

  • @Packerd01

    "How can you also be progressive to an islamist while he is very neoconservative?"

    We've not discussed Islam, only North Korea. So I haven't gone either way on his religio-political views. Time to re-read the thread on my channel.

    "Muslims are not progressive, that's why there is an islam problem in Europe."

    A lot of Muslims are not integrating when they move. Historically, neither do Jews. Does the world have a Jew problem? I don't think you'd say so very quickly, would you?

  • @Packerd01

    "...she represents just like all socialist do, herself and the party and not the people."

    That broad brush you're painting Socialists with must be heavy. Invest in a smaller, lighter one.

    "A democrat is someone who loves hes country and respects the valeue's of it and wants to hold them and listens to the people."

    Yeah, a person who supports democracy is a person who votes the way I do and thinks the way I think. That's a REAL patriot's viewpoint. Do you LISTEN to yourself?

  • @Packerd01

    "A PM is there manly to support and represent and help all people of the country."

    You DO understand that this is what any PM is trying to do, right? When a coalition forms, the root is generally a couple of reasons:

    (a) The parties' platforms are somewhat compatible.

    (b) The officials believe they are doing the best thing for the country by forming a coalition.

    Given the above, it is perfectly reasonable for a PM to try to maintain an existing coalition. Don't you GET that?

  • @Packerd01

    "And I have noticed that you are well in contact with islamists(terrorists) says enough about how fucked you socialists are."

    Don't even fucking go there. The man posted comments on my channel, and since he didn't say anything which could be considered worthy of removal I let his comments stand. You will notice if you look at the latest developments on my feed that I have taken him to task with regard to the issue of North Korea. We are NOT "well in contact".

  • @Packerd01

    /watch?v=zPSK1DgjfN8&feature=c­­hannel_video_title

    Why the hell is this one even fucking relevant? Tony Blair makes a statement that while he doesn't wish his opponent well politically (i.e. he doesn't support the direction his opponent wants to go), he wishes the man well as a person.

    What's your point by posting this? Did you get your feelings hurt over what is really a fairly innocuous comment which is very easily understood? GROW UP.

  • @Packerd01

    /watch?v=n8rsyg0lkkM

    This video illustrates that you don't understand how Parliamentary government works. It's about coalition building. In order to gain a sufficient level of support to gain a Prime Ministerial position (and thus have any influence at all), parties are forced to compromise with their allies with regard to which issues to emphasize and support. In other words, if Gillard wants to gain the support of the environmentalists on HER initiatives, she must support THEIRS.

  • @Packerd01

    Read this very carefully: I never said that Socialism or Socialist parties were beyond reproach. I merely stated that you were not giving any credit to those parties which had brought great success to their countries (Socialdemokraterne, for example) and taking the events in Greece and Spain as the norm. You're disregarding any evidence against your claims. That's a fucking TEXTBOOK DEFINITION of a biased analysis.

    Now let's have a look at your video links.

  • @Packerd01

    In fact, the Danish economy is in fairly good straits and has been for some time. A progressive taxation system coupled with careful fiscal planning has resulted in a very stable country which offers extensive welfare benefits. The Venstre-Konservative-Dansk Folkeparti alliance played a hand in this stability recently, but is not solely responsible. In fact, Socialdemokraterne personnel have held Prime Ministerial positions for at LEAST as long as Venstre and Konservative COMBINED.

  • @Packerd01

    As for your call that I examine the damage done to Europe by Socialism, I'd imagine what you're referring to is the current Euro crisis and the economic crises of Portugal, Ireland, Greece, Spain, and (to an extent) Great Britain.

    That you mark these as failures inherent to Socialism illustrates that you have no understanding of what is actually happening. Countries which overextended their welfare initiatives relative to their intake are failing, those that didn't aren't.

  • @Packerd01

    I'm telling you that you're examining the data in a manner that ultimately fulfills your preconceived notions (self-fulfilling prophecy). Just because you examine and report part of the data doesn't mean that you're "telling facts and being honest". It actually means the OPPOSITE.

    "...what I have noticed before is is that socialists ALWAYS lie, there is no logic in what they say."

    Evidence of your bias, from your own mouth. Sorry to report you're an awful political scientist.

  • @Packerd01

    You've argued that no one trusts Social Democrats and Socialists anymore while simultaneously moaning about how the Danes have made an egregious error for trusting Socialdemokraterne with enough support to allow an SD prime minister. You've said that the Venstre-Konservative-Dansk Folkeparti coalition had its ups and downs while simultaneously cringing at the very MENTION of a Socialdemokraterne government, in spite of such coalitions' past successes.

    You. are. biased.

  • @Packerd01

    Yes, you're being rational. But not in the sense that you're making a reason-based argument, but rather in the sense that you're actions logically pursue your goals.

    My accusation that you are examining the issues at hand from a biased perspective stands. You disregard the failures of Conservative coalitions as mere outliers and decry the failures of more Left-leaning ones as evidences of the dangers of Leftism. TRY to deny it.

  • @Packerd01

    That sort of explains why you spoke on the matter. You're vehemently opposed to Socialism and Social Democracy. But my point is straightforward: you have no interest in Denmark, so you have no right to dictate what should and should not be done there.

    Besides, your analytical technique is biased. You've passed off any mistakes that the previous coalition made as mere datapoints in a series of ups and downs, but you scream bloody murder when a Left government ever fails at anything.

  • @Packerd01

    You're not Danish. So why exactly does it matter to you how the Danish people vote or who the prime minister is? Do you have some vested interest in Denmark's affairs?

  • @Packerd01

    You're not Danish. So why exactly does it matter to you how the Danish people vote or who the prime minister is? Do you have some vested interest in Denmark's affairs?

  • Sagens kerne er blot, at selv ikke Helle Thorning-Schmidt træffer sine egne beslutninger... - vi vil angiveligt se en yderligere forberedelse til den socialistiske verdensstat. Demokrati er en smuk idé, som måske en dag bliver en realitet. Som det er nu, er det et demokratur. Læs gerne bogen "Demokratiet undergraves oppefra" af Jussi Merklin - bemærk at bogen er fra 1980. Hvor befinder Danmark sig nu takket være de sovende danskere, der har nok i fodhold, fest og frikadeller.

  • @Packerd01

    you mean... fucked up like how Venstre and the DF have? They've were only in power for ten years and they've gone against their EU obligations. what made Denmark the great country it is was the support of a welfare state and reforms with the socialdemokraterne and even the conservatives. Plus, The left wing have have ruled Denmark for the majority of its time in the 20th century... i think you need to learn a few things..

  • Nå Helle; har du fået snakket færdig med Vestager? Arbejdet kalder, du skal ind og fremsætte forslag om at skrotte efterlønnen.

  • FUCK DIG DIT GRIMME SVIN!

  • Undskyld - ved at stemme på Socialdemokratiet er der da lige præcis nogen der træffer mine valg ved at hæve afgifterne, indføre love og forbud. Så det giver ingen mening det hun siger.

  • look foward to the mass immigration to denmark.. silly people.. she sucks

  • @uatch Din racist...hva er problemet med andre mennesker end os danskere i Danmark? Narrøv!

  • Kære Helle, nu har vi endelig fået valgt. Og som det første skal du fremlægge tilbagetrækningsreform. Rigtig god fornøjelse med at afskaffe efterlønnen.

  • @l0lhackz Han er en troll... Lad være med at svare ham.

  • Hvis usunde ting bliver dyre bliver sunde ting billigere, folk får råd til rigtig mad. Go Helle!

  • @NineNineFive øhm nej? Sunde ting vil koste det samme.

  • Helle - YOU ARE AN AGENT FOR BILDERBERG - YOUR PLAN IS TO BRING DENMARK TO ITS KNEES AND SERVE THE GLOBAL ELITISTS WITH THEIR NEW WORLD ORDER. DENMARK WILL LOSE ALL OF ITS SOVEREIGNTY AND RIGHT TO VOTE ON ANYTHING. YOU ARE AN ILLUMINATI PUPPET.

  • @Death2ILLUMINATISTS Kun folk som er født uden noget siger sådan noget om den eneste RIGTIGE person, som skulle være i Folketinget.

  • blaaaablaaaablaaaa

  • Mht Thorning-Schmidt som statsminister. "Man skal passe på med hvad man ønsker, det kunne være det gik i opfyldelse".

    En statsminister der ikke kender de basale finansbegreber, og en måske kommende udenrigsminister der ikke kan engelsk. ( Søvndahl ).

    Det bliver kun en underholdende regering, og ikke en landsledelse/administration.

    Som Thorning her siger " Man må TRAFFE sine valg".

    - Jeg TRÆFFER så mit valg.

  • Daginstitution???? hvad skete der lige med ordet Børnehave???

  • Socialdemokraterne har humor. De er sjove og forstår at lave komiske film-klip af regeringen. MEN så stopper den vist også her. De har ingen form for økonomisk ansvarlighed, og det må man jo sige at være en skam. De 12 minutter er jo en vits, men der har det komiske jo igen været inde over. Deres "Fair fattigdom" vil lede Danmark i et sort hul, fyldt med gæld, fyldt vores stærkt-engelsktalende Villy Søvndal.

    Stem Venstre - Varig velfærd - Økonomisk ansvarlighed!

    VU.

  • @larrentilda731 Hvorfor Venstre? Hvorfor ikke Liberal Alliance? Venstre vil ikke sænke skatten og selvom vi i 10 år har haft en VK regering har vi stadig verdens mest socialistiske samfund og verdens højeste skat. LA har som det eneste parti i Danmark fået deres plan gennemgået af uafhængige økonomer. Økonomerne siger at deres plan bl.a vil skabe 210.000 nye arbejdspladser. Derudover vil de give os mere frihed og mindre bureaukrati.

  • @LoveMusic123211 Og mindre velfærd, så ja, det perfekte parti til egoisterne.

  • @NorthStarAritharo Snarere tværtimod. Vi er faktisk dem som gerne vil værne om vores velfærdssamfund men hvis vi bliver ved med at hæve skatterne vil mange virksomheder og højtuddannede flytte ud af Danmark også har vi ikke råd til velfærd mere.

  • @LoveMusic123211 Hellere fattig end afhængig af grimme egoister.

  • @NorthStarAritharo Et parti for egoister? Kun 15% af dem som går på efterløn er reelt nedslidt fysisk eller psykisk. Hvorfor skal vi betale for de 85% som bare er for dovne til at gå på arbejde? De 15% som faktisk er nedslidte kan jo bare gå på førtidspension? Efterlønnen er 110% overflødig. Og du sagde "Hellere fattig end afhængig af grimme egoister". Disse "grimme egoister". De 20% rigeste betaler 50% af skatten i Danmark. De 40% fattigeste betaler 10%.

  • @NorthStarAritharo Det vil altså sige at du er afhængig af disse "grimme egoister". Og socialdemokraterne-S-SF-Ø vil have at du skal blive ved med at være mest mulig afhængig af disse grimme egoister. Så dem er du jo ikke enige med. Hvem er du så enig med?

  • @larrentilda731 Tror du virkelig selv på det du skriver? Sikke en verden jeg lever i, hvad blev der af solidariteten?

  • @NorthStarAritharo Det jeg skriver er udelukkende facts. Enhver ved jo, at Rødblok ingen forstand har på økonomisk ansvarlig - bortset fra Vestager, hun har dog lidt mellem ørene. Kig en gang på hvor lidt af den socialistiske politik der er blevet grundlag for den nye regering. 12 minutter er væk, topskatten bliver ikke indført - det samme med millionærskatten. Den nye regering er jo en joke, heldigvis holder den ikke mere end 1,5 - 2 år.

  • @larrentilda731 Underligt hvordan det ellers i fortiden altid har været Social Demokraterne der har reddet økonomien. Måske du skulle læse mere historie end Ekstra Bladet?

  • @NorthStarAritharo Haha, mener du seriøst det der...? Da finanskrisen ramte os, havde Blåblok betalt al den gæld som Nyrup var skyld i, tilbage. Rødblok er jo kendt for at tro, at jo flere penge man bruger, des rigere bliver man. Det er åbentbart logik for dig?

  • @NorthStarAritharo Hvad der blev af solidariteten? - Hva' snakker du om??

  • Comment removed

  • en pudderso som fanden har skabt

  • Ja, skøn ukonkret og traditionel overskriftspolitik fra S, partiet der har overlevet sig selv for årtier siden da landet i dag dybest set er temmelig borgerlig indstillet, med undtagelse af et useriøst anarkistisk og socialistisk skingert mindretal. Hemmelige planer der ikke kan finansieres, dvs. de gode gamle pengebrugende skatte-sosser som vi kender dem, og så midt i en krisetid. Hvor usmart.

  • var der en mening med det hun sagde?

    

  • dejlig ukonkret

    

  • Hvad er det man får indflydelse på efter et valg - absolut ingenting ! Godt der findes alternativer til S.

  • Pølsesnak!

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more