you're right,what would americans know of aerodynamics after all it was you guys who came up with the SR71,BOEING,THE FIRST HELICOPTER,WRIGHT BROS,CURTIS,FIRST TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT,ROBINSON,SIKORSKI,FIRST SEAPLANE,X-15,BELL X1,ON AND ON AND ON,WHAT HAVE YOU EVER DONE IN AVIATION WORTH MENTIONING THAT WE HAVENT DONE FIRST OR BETTER.
they probably spent just as much to get these flying as if they would have properly designed them in the first place, lol. Anybody looking for spare parts? I think they have many, lol.
What is that thing made from??? Massive carbonfiber??? any ordinary RC model of that size and weight would have been turned into a heap of splinters by those impacts.
A teeter hub is a simple kind of see-saw or rocker junction that allows the rotor to lift up more on one side than the other. As the aircraft flies forwards, the blade advancing into the wind gets more lift than the retreating blade, so it wants to be higher. The teeter hub allows that to happen - otherwise the whole aircraft will tend to turn over onto its side, which is what seems to be happening here.
This was all worked out by Juan de la Cierva, when he invented the autogiro.
Dang that sucks! All I can see are dollars . . too many being wasted. But if it's what you're into I guess it's not a big deal. Sort of like NASCAR drivers, pay heeps of cash for their cars knowing they could crash.
This was at the beginning of the modern day RPV program. These craft were all developed and hand crafted from scratch. The Hind was created as a gyro to serve as targets for live fire exercises. To provide actual functioning helicopters as seen in my other video to serve as expendable targets would have been pretty expensive therefore the gyro version was created as an alternative design to create the same effect. While i re-located shortly after these videos, i believe they did eventually fly.
The pilot on the hill would fly the model up and down the valley to be fired at by the troopers.
the speed and size of the models made them look very realistic in flight, and it was cheaper than the real thing.
They also had detectors on the models that were supposed to make smoke when "lit up " by an infra red light on the guns, sometimes they cheated, the model pilot would switch the smoke on!
The models were flown out of the valley and back over the lake, the first pilot would then take over.
This was a company out of Barstow California, they made and flew target drones (large models of Soviet aircraft) for the military games at Ft Irwin.
The models would be launched from the catapult at a dry lake, flown towards the hills surrounding the live fire area, and "handed off" to another pilot with a transmitter on the crest over looking the live fire area.
the second guy would switch his transmitter on, on radio command, the first pilot at the launch area would then switch his off.
It does even look close to windmilling when they launch does it. I think you actually could catapult a gyro with a sufficiently powerful pre-rotation. As in very close to or at flying rpm. You would have seen gyro-gliders flying in the wind on a rope - a catapult is just pulling that rope in.
Whats the idea with these? The other model looks like a Sukhoi SU 25. Are these models for teaching aircraft recognition to troops or something like that?
Was that from the Star Wars?
ValdasRBK 1 month ago
sounds like they were speaking russian to me ha
GLDHUNTRS 6 months ago
que idiotas semejante grandulones jugando!!!!
walos1323 8 months ago
You guys are right- the aerodynamics on 9/11 didn't make sense either.. at least the air speeds and turns etc.. seeing as how the planes were fake.
sanluisskywatch 8 months ago
@sanluisskywatch where can i get a hold of the shit YOUR smoken?
19or50 7 months ago 2
LOL!
Kitcatcoat 8 months ago
YES!!!! :D
andytheweb 8 months ago
you're right,what would americans know of aerodynamics after all it was you guys who came up with the SR71,BOEING,THE FIRST HELICOPTER,WRIGHT BROS,CURTIS,FIRST TRANSATLANTIC FLIGHT,ROBINSON,SIKORSKI,FIRST SEAPLANE,X-15,BELL X1,ON AND ON AND ON,WHAT HAVE YOU EVER DONE IN AVIATION WORTH MENTIONING THAT WE HAVENT DONE FIRST OR BETTER.
damiandiesel1 9 months ago
And not enough rotor speed.
BushPilot444 10 months ago
they probably spent just as much to get these flying as if they would have properly designed them in the first place, lol. Anybody looking for spare parts? I think they have many, lol.
GhettoCowboy2010 10 months ago
ACME! Coyote tested and Road Runner Approved!
Puronicth 11 months ago 2
ahhahahah what a POS, what is the purpose of this abortion?
sonebezi 1 year ago
melhor que oa irmaos white....
mjmarcos25 1 year ago
Cierva...is laughing to this...!!!!
tonymac96 1 year ago
Ooops
solarday 1 year ago
Continental test to destruction program!
schlusselmensch 1 year ago
mot a strong enogh motor need a stronger motor for more lift
cmberry09 1 year ago
hey is this the Continental RPVS from Barstow?
oliverlebot 1 year ago
What is that thing made from??? Massive carbonfiber??? any ordinary RC model of that size and weight would have been turned into a heap of splinters by those impacts.
BlackTalon53 2 years ago
Ah, you crazy Americans! Looks like they''ve forgotten that a rotor has asymmetric lift, and needs a teeter hub ... Cierva would turn in his grave.
And actually it's not a gyrocopter, it's a heliplane.
neuralwarp 2 years ago 14
Comment removed
robiniroven 2 years ago
What is a teeter hub?
Ralroost 1 year ago
A teeter hub is a simple kind of see-saw or rocker junction that allows the rotor to lift up more on one side than the other. As the aircraft flies forwards, the blade advancing into the wind gets more lift than the retreating blade, so it wants to be higher. The teeter hub allows that to happen - otherwise the whole aircraft will tend to turn over onto its side, which is what seems to be happening here.
This was all worked out by Juan de la Cierva, when he invented the autogiro.
neuralwarp 1 year ago
I liked the ending lol
"Well thats it for the day......"
Lordangers 2 years ago
Too much rotor torque vs light weight, this turns it.
rpdigital17 2 years ago
Why are they all wearing lab coats?
Altayayo 2 years ago
Hmm...maybe change the RC operator. He is making the same mistake or he doesn't know how to run it.
itsmonti1 2 years ago
needs more rotor speed I think
RoboTekno 2 years ago 2
they would have earned more cash if they sold it as a scale fuselage for rc helicopters.
Bomberboy92 2 years ago
Hmm, it crashed twice, so.... let's try it again!!
qarusel 2 years ago
I wonder how long it took them before the realised the rotor speed wasn't quite enough
blacls 2 years ago 2
HEY!!! Hind's are fuking awesome
Sharkformer 2 years ago 2
What did you aspect !?? Hind is Russian made !!
riotagus 2 years ago
Perhaps they are not familiar with the aerodynamics! :)))
MultiHeavenly 2 years ago 12
There is a video someplace else on here of a Kiowa sgooting one of these down so the project was eventually sucsessful I guess. cool footage.
lst1195 2 years ago
Dang that sucks! All I can see are dollars . . too many being wasted. But if it's what you're into I guess it's not a big deal. Sort of like NASCAR drivers, pay heeps of cash for their cars knowing they could crash.
hootyhaha 2 years ago
Fail
xoio 2 years ago
It does not fly very well
zorro181969 2 years ago
roflcopter goes soi soi soi
Thekempy 2 years ago 2
This was at the beginning of the modern day RPV program. These craft were all developed and hand crafted from scratch. The Hind was created as a gyro to serve as targets for live fire exercises. To provide actual functioning helicopters as seen in my other video to serve as expendable targets would have been pretty expensive therefore the gyro version was created as an alternative design to create the same effect. While i re-located shortly after these videos, i believe they did eventually fly.
xviper150 2 years ago
The pilot on the hill would fly the model up and down the valley to be fired at by the troopers.
the speed and size of the models made them look very realistic in flight, and it was cheaper than the real thing.
They also had detectors on the models that were supposed to make smoke when "lit up " by an infra red light on the guns, sometimes they cheated, the model pilot would switch the smoke on!
The models were flown out of the valley and back over the lake, the first pilot would then take over.
moggywan 2 years ago
This was a company out of Barstow California, they made and flew target drones (large models of Soviet aircraft) for the military games at Ft Irwin.
The models would be launched from the catapult at a dry lake, flown towards the hills surrounding the live fire area, and "handed off" to another pilot with a transmitter on the crest over looking the live fire area.
the second guy would switch his transmitter on, on radio command, the first pilot at the launch area would then switch his off.
moggywan 2 years ago
I guess it is because of disymetry of lift
dajsinjo 3 years ago
hahaha stupid. Rotor and wing in the same plane?
motconga 3 years ago
It's like giving some random idiots money to build something. I mean, what the heck did they expect to happen?
toddi1971 3 years ago
Not enough rotor speed, you can't catapult a gyro
gyroplanefdk 3 years ago 2
gyroplanefdk - accepted answer - well done
It does even look close to windmilling when they launch does it. I think you actually could catapult a gyro with a sufficiently powerful pre-rotation. As in very close to or at flying rpm. You would have seen gyro-gliders flying in the wind on a rope - a catapult is just pulling that rope in.
bunjit1 3 years ago
one question, WHY ??
Tork64 3 years ago
Whats the idea with these? The other model looks like a Sukhoi SU 25. Are these models for teaching aircraft recognition to troops or something like that?
Ogenerang 3 years ago
UM So this is what they do in area51 with our tax money? Playing with toys? on now im pissed
adam3176 3 years ago
OK, So we've made an RC 'plane' with a rotor on top to look like a HInd Chopper?
Did anyone stop to think that the rotor might have an effect?
pylon500 3 years ago