@DeltaAtheism, you entirely miss the point. You can't disprove God is not said to people like you as evidence for God. It's said selectively because you need to get it and understand it. There's plenty of evidence for God. There's zero evidence against God. A Einstein said, in humility and recognition of the unknown he'd be called an agnostic, but professional atheists are just still struggling against the fetters of their upbringing.
Hey, Bill O'Reilly, I got news for you, you have a right to your own opinions. You don't, however, have a right to your own facts or truths, without reducing both those words to meaningless nonsense.
Fifty years of photographic study by the U.S. Naval Observatory, the Harvard Smithsonian High Altitude Observatory, and the Royal Greenwich Observatory, has shown that the sun shrinks about 6 feet an hour. Going back in time, in a hundred thousand years the sun would have been twice as large. Two hundred and ten million years ago the earth and the sun would have been touching. Evolution on the earth would have been impossible.
I've heard this ridiculous comment before from religious nuts. It makes no logical sense whatsoever. If they knew anything about the scientific method, nothing exists until there's replicable data/evidence to form a probable conclusion.
Similarly, in a court of law, it's not up to me to prove that I didn't do the crime, it's up to the prosecution to prove it with evidence.
Religious nuts wrongly start with the assumption that God is real. That's backwards from rational thought.
This video, as almost all of yours videos, is great. However, I wish you wouldn't distort your voice because it's hard to understand what you are saying. I imagine you have a purpose for that, but it makes it very hard to understand... I wanted to comment this for a while now.
@DeltaAtheism, you entirely miss the point. You can't disprove God is not said to people like you as evidence for God. It's said selectively because you need to get it and understand it. There's plenty of evidence for God. There's zero evidence against God. A Einstein said, in humility and recognition of the unknown he'd be called an agnostic, but professional atheists are just still struggling against the fetters of their upbringing.
cmottes 3 months ago
Hey, Bill O'Reilly, I got news for you, you have a right to your own opinions. You don't, however, have a right to your own facts or truths, without reducing both those words to meaningless nonsense.
Kailoa36 1 year ago
Can you explain this to me?
Fifty years of photographic study by the U.S. Naval Observatory, the Harvard Smithsonian High Altitude Observatory, and the Royal Greenwich Observatory, has shown that the sun shrinks about 6 feet an hour. Going back in time, in a hundred thousand years the sun would have been twice as large. Two hundred and ten million years ago the earth and the sun would have been touching. Evolution on the earth would have been impossible.
What do you think?
Th3Bl1ndSp0t 1 year ago
Your argument is bogus. In fact, I have a video on it. Search up "Blown out of the Water - the Sun is Shrinking".
DeltaAtheism 1 year ago
I've heard this ridiculous comment before from religious nuts. It makes no logical sense whatsoever. If they knew anything about the scientific method, nothing exists until there's replicable data/evidence to form a probable conclusion.
Similarly, in a court of law, it's not up to me to prove that I didn't do the crime, it's up to the prosecution to prove it with evidence.
Religious nuts wrongly start with the assumption that God is real. That's backwards from rational thought.
eepruls 2 years ago
cmonn
doug5501 2 years ago
...?
DeltaAtheism 2 years ago
Reason and rationality it is my most fervent hope will win this contest against ignorance and Superstition.
KasparHauser4 2 years ago 2
I love Ayn Rand.
johnnyk2112 2 years ago
Gahhh! Edward Current, Matt Dillahunty, and Richard Dawkins! Great men!
Great vid!! :)
PunkCabaretFTW 2 years ago
This video, as almost all of yours videos, is great. However, I wish you wouldn't distort your voice because it's hard to understand what you are saying. I imagine you have a purpose for that, but it makes it very hard to understand... I wanted to comment this for a while now.
musmusik 2 years ago
I do it for two reasons.
One, to remove my accent - which would make comprehension harder - and two, to provide a measure of safety.
1RadicalOne 2 years ago
Everytime I see Ed Current with that aparatus on I crack up.
5* and fav.
RandyLayhea 2 years ago
"I love reality!" Lmao.
iamericwhite 2 years ago 2
Hehe.. good old Edward Current is a great satirist :P
RyuDarragh 2 years ago 9