@zodei difficult question... divide by tan(x) to obtain the standard form of this 1st order linear ODE: y'+p(x)*y=q(x); p(x)=cot(x), q(x)=csc(x). multiply both sides by an integrating factor u(x) to obtain u(x)*y'+p(x)*u(x)*y=q(x). why? if u(x) is chosen carefully the product rule will simplify this to [1.1] (u(x)*y)'=q(x). for that to work u'(x) has to be p(x)*u(x), so u'(x)/u(x)=p(x), so ln(u(x))=p(x), so u(x)=e^integral(p(x)). use this to calculate u(x). plug it into [1.1]. integrate [1.1].
@zodei 'so ln(u(x))=p(x)', sry that was supposed to be 'ln(u(x))=integral(p(x))'... i was supposed to integrate both sides... the integral of u'(x)/u(x) is ln(u(x)) (due to the chain rule - just derive ln(u(x)) to check this) and i forgot to integrate the right hand side. in the next step i didn't make that mistake because i got u(x)=e^integral(p(x)). i realize these remarks can only be a hint to the actual solution but i still hope they are gonna be helpful.
never in my entire life would i have said anything having to do with calculus is beautiful, but i needed serious help, and this video answered my cries. thank you so much, khan academy.
If one integrates with the x side without dividing by y in both sides of the equation, can the equation be solved anyway? It didn't work for me and I guess it cannot be solved, why?
i don't know what more surprising...you explaining a semester worth's course in one sitting, or why im blowing $200,000 on professors who are good at nothing more than putting me to sleep
grate exeplination, this is the first time I understande math and have really intresst in math and want to learn more, thanks allote, you have change the world a grate deal.
just imagine if all school teachers could teach like you do!!!!
You cleared up A LOT of confusions that I have about this subject (my teacher who normally doesn't even teach that well was absent today so I was left to my own devices), and now I can do my homework (:
@b23571113 Everyone how is tdowning you are homeless-the-sexuals.
When he substituted-in the initial value of "when x=0, y=1", sin(x) becomes sin(0). The triangle formed when the angle is zero has no vertical, or "opposite" component. Remember SOHCAHTOA? So, sin(0)=0.
You've probably figured that out by now, but if you had asked, then there are probably other people who've wondered the same thing.
He did not need to, since there was something already multiplying the dy/dx. When you have that situation, you only need to divide the multiplying quantity.
divide both sides by 2, when you do this you get rid of the 2 on the right side and you can either divide the 4 by 2 or the 5 by 2 (which would be silly because that would give you a fraction, but the answer would still work out correctly)
So...
5*(4/2)=x
5*2=x
x=10
on his example you have two terms multiplied together as well so he chose the "easiest" term to divide into.
I don't have to go to lecture ever again. Thank you so much.
taylornhunsucker 1 week ago in playlist Differential Equations
you rock.
betonmolenislol 1 month ago in playlist Differential Equations
Test tomorrow, you just saved me
WetHotFarts 1 month ago 3
hey! How you solve this tan x dy/dx + y = sec x? =D
zodei 3 months ago
@zodei difficult question... divide by tan(x) to obtain the standard form of this 1st order linear ODE: y'+p(x)*y=q(x); p(x)=cot(x), q(x)=csc(x). multiply both sides by an integrating factor u(x) to obtain u(x)*y'+p(x)*u(x)*y=q(x). why? if u(x) is chosen carefully the product rule will simplify this to [1.1] (u(x)*y)'=q(x). for that to work u'(x) has to be p(x)*u(x), so u'(x)/u(x)=p(x), so ln(u(x))=p(x), so u(x)=e^integral(p(x)). use this to calculate u(x). plug it into [1.1]. integrate [1.1].
Exploratorius12 3 months ago in playlist Differential Equations
@zodei 'so ln(u(x))=p(x)', sry that was supposed to be 'ln(u(x))=integral(p(x))'... i was supposed to integrate both sides... the integral of u'(x)/u(x) is ln(u(x)) (due to the chain rule - just derive ln(u(x)) to check this) and i forgot to integrate the right hand side. in the next step i didn't make that mistake because i got u(x)=e^integral(p(x)). i realize these remarks can only be a hint to the actual solution but i still hope they are gonna be helpful.
Exploratorius12 2 months ago
PLEASE WHAT'S THE NAME OF THIS SOFTWARE ?
platazar 4 months ago
@platazar MS Paint?
dolnodjob 4 months ago in playlist Differential Equations
y go to class for 50 mins when i can learn it in 5 mins, in my pj's
UKGrahamUK 4 months ago 5
With the four simple words "implicit differentiation in reverse" I suddenly had a door of understanding flung wide open by my new hero, you.
PelicanGodOfJupiter 6 months ago
awesome...
TheDjchugz 8 months ago
:))))))) SO HELPFUL
Laimmemo 8 months ago
:)))))))
Laimmemo 8 months ago
i'm unable to fine a video on non-homegenous differential equations, if you don't have one i guess this is just a suggestion.
Keep up the grerat work
XeadXhot 8 months ago
@XeadXhot
Just find a homegenous one (Yh) and a particular solution (Yp) Then Y = Yh + Yp
somethingonmyhip 8 months ago
Like im sooo happy i could cry !!!! I finnally get this stuff...
MimiD3 8 months ago
thx (:
xman9344 9 months ago
this video is so beautiful.
never in my entire life would i have said anything having to do with calculus is beautiful, but i needed serious help, and this video answered my cries. thank you so much, khan academy.
p3s5h 9 months ago
At Khan Academy , the bell never rings! I wanna separably differentiate all day now
"In Khan We Trust".
drrojas 9 months ago
be my prof pls
ynut666 9 months ago
3 dislikes? really? If Sal can't make you understand this, nobody can!!!
gdeep783 10 months ago
If one integrates with the x side without dividing by y in both sides of the equation, can the equation be solved anyway? It didn't work for me and I guess it cannot be solved, why?
wolterh6 10 months ago
You are so helpful. This makes math make sense. Thanks!
337punter 10 months ago
i don't know what more surprising...you explaining a semester worth's course in one sitting, or why im blowing $200,000 on professors who are good at nothing more than putting me to sleep
hanz12891 10 months ago
i had knew anything before watching this then i just got a BB from diff. eqns.. u are a hero!
TheJavaExpert 10 months ago
Thanks! Came home from school conpletely lost but you saved me!
Rizmaestro 1 year ago
my webwork asks for y= blah blah but i cant set them to one side :(
ooweirdoo 1 year ago
"We have to separate the wives from the exes" I heard this and lol'd.
Dimbnd 1 year ago 6
I don't know nothing about no computers mister.
321boileranimal 1 year ago
I don't know nothing about no computers mister.
321boileranimal 1 year ago
how can i solve this Sal? 6xy+e^y+(3x^2+xe^y)y'=0 Please give me advise on this. I'm totally lost.
jakub9983 1 year ago
@jakub9983 It's not separable (actually most DEs aren't separable). Look at the videos on exact equations. I think it is exact.
dalcde 1 year ago
@dalcde You are right, its exact. Thank you very much. Its so easy to solve when you know algorithm. :)
jakub9983 1 year ago
y are u such a good teacher
alan48085 1 year ago
Is it possible to solve Maxwell's Equations?
dalcde 1 year ago
and now i can be a badass before i start differential equation.
Forman6 1 year ago
we were dividing both sides by y, what about a case when y = 0?
ches111 1 year ago
STOP!
latenightsesh55 1 year ago
I really need to say "THANKS ALOT MAN!!!" you save my whole entire life!!
disornr 1 year ago 5
is it possible to call these 'implicit integrals'?
louwas93 1 year ago
@louwas93 i was wonderin the same tin
iloveuanonlyu 1 year ago
Are professors bothered by you being 10x more concise than they are?
shaunmikex 1 year ago 77
@shaunmikex
theyJeLLy?
doubleja 1 year ago
@shaunmikex Sadly, I don't think most professors give a crap how well they teach.
ahage16 8 months ago
I don't understand the second step where he takes the derivative =(
rabia22p 1 year ago
@rabia22p Both sides were divided by y.
zzackkkk 1 year ago
Thanks ! 5*
TuscaniManiac 1 year ago
Most useful videos i have ever seen on youtube
Thank you Khan bhai.
rizwanspirit 2 years ago
I swear I am suing my school to get my money back for my EA class to give it to you lol, thanks!
mchk2 2 years ago 3
My friend and I had our calc teacher keep your website URL on the whiteboard for people to utilize. :)
bkisme 2 years ago
100th person to rate this vid a perfect 5/5 :D
PrinceFX 2 years ago
You are a admirable mystery!
nemothecute 2 years ago
You would be a GREAT math professor, if you haven't been one. :D
SweetMusic223 2 years ago 2
You help me soo much!! THX VERY MUCH! YOU ARE A GREAT TEACHER!
philg24 2 years ago 2
Teacher of the year :)
mvtrumpetgeek13 2 years ago 6
grate exeplination, this is the first time I understande math and have really intresst in math and want to learn more, thanks allote, you have change the world a grate deal.
just imagine if all school teachers could teach like you do!!!!
fettosh 2 years ago 6
thank you so much for this (:
You cleared up A LOT of confusions that I have about this subject (my teacher who normally doesn't even teach that well was absent today so I was left to my own devices), and now I can do my homework (:
wayofwei 2 years ago
how do you know what sinx is?
b23571113 2 years ago
google the "unit circle"
katievstheworld 2 years ago
@b23571113 Everyone how is tdowning you are homeless-the-sexuals.
When he substituted-in the initial value of "when x=0, y=1", sin(x) becomes sin(0). The triangle formed when the angle is zero has no vertical, or "opposite" component. Remember SOHCAHTOA? So, sin(0)=0.
You've probably figured that out by now, but if you had asked, then there are probably other people who've wondered the same thing.
BarbaraVValters 2 years ago
thanks!!!!!
vivi17P 2 years ago
Damn you are good i never got this shit in class
bakopala 2 years ago 6
Great Explain : )
hatemakingnamesup 2 years ago
can anyone confirm that if you make y the subject you get y=e^[(sinx)/3]
TheWarTorn 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
REALLY great videos.
PhasmatisApparatus 2 years ago
Dude! I wish you were our lecturer at uni - very helpful indeed.
Tank878 2 years ago 3
you should teach @ Clark!!! i wish my instructor expained that well....much thanks
eur04lif3 2 years ago
youre a baller. thanks for the vids
netrusher22 2 years ago 4
Hi i am new to Diff=tions but how come when he divided by y to get rid of y from right hand side, he did not divide the dy/dx by y?
timo86m 2 years ago
He did not need to, since there was something already multiplying the dy/dx. When you have that situation, you only need to divide the multiplying quantity.
cagedkiller360 2 years ago
I think it's because dy/dx is multiplied by (1+2y^2).
shadowC10ne 2 years ago
5*4=2*x
divide both sides by 2, when you do this you get rid of the 2 on the right side and you can either divide the 4 by 2 or the 5 by 2 (which would be silly because that would give you a fraction, but the answer would still work out correctly)
So...
5*(4/2)=x
5*2=x
x=10
on his example you have two terms multiplied together as well so he chose the "easiest" term to divide into.
curtisjb1983 2 years ago
you are def the man. thanks so much.
standaman109 2 years ago 28
Thx for the effort man :)
gonzodercoole 2 years ago 10
super!
cwhc333 3 years ago 5
just when i thought i was screwed, TNX! really helpful.
dieharddd25 3 years ago 4
you save lives!!!!!
Thank You and keep it up!
Studentatmacomb 3 years ago 2
I looooove these videos...
thank you!!
AWorldsCreator 3 years ago
Fantastic, thank you !!!
I keenly anticipate the numerical solutions, which you have mentioned, for both differential equations and integration.
Once again, thank you.
gambuzo 3 years ago
Thanks for uploading!
dave597 3 years ago
king sal
SteadyHaze 3 years ago 4