Added: 3 years ago
From: khanacademy
Views: 103,330
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (83)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • I don't have to go to lecture ever again. Thank you so much.

  • you rock.

  • Test tomorrow, you just saved me

  • hey! How you solve this tan x dy/dx + y = sec x? =D

  • @zodei difficult question... divide by tan(x) to obtain the standard form of this 1st order linear ODE: y'+p(x)*y=q(x); p(x)=cot(x), q(x)=csc(x). multiply both sides by an integrating factor u(x) to obtain u(x)*y'+p(x)*u(x)*y=q(x). why? if u(x) is chosen carefully the product rule will simplify this to [1.1] (u(x)*y)'=q(x). for that to work u'(x) has to be p(x)*u(x), so u'(x)/u(x)=p(x), so ln(u(x))=p(x), so u(x)=e^integral(p(x)). use this to calculate u(x). plug it into [1.1]. integrate [1.1].

  • @zodei 'so ln(u(x))=p(x)', sry that was supposed to be 'ln(u(x))=integral(p(x))'... i was supposed to integrate both sides... the integral of u'(x)/u(x) is ln(u(x)) (due to the chain rule - just derive ln(u(x)) to check this) and i forgot to integrate the right hand side. in the next step i didn't make that mistake because i got u(x)=e^integral(p(x)). i realize these remarks can only be a hint to the actual solution but i still hope they are gonna be helpful.

  • PLEASE WHAT'S THE NAME OF THIS SOFTWARE ?

  • @platazar MS Paint?

  • y go to class for 50 mins when i can learn it in 5 mins, in my pj's

  • With the four simple words "implicit differentiation in reverse" I suddenly had a door of understanding flung wide open by my new hero, you.

  • awesome...

  • :))))))) SO HELPFUL

  • :)))))))

  • i'm unable to fine a video on non-homegenous differential equations, if you don't have one i guess this is just a suggestion.

    Keep up the grerat work

  • @XeadXhot

    Just find a homegenous one (Yh) and a particular solution (Yp) Then Y = Yh + Yp

  • Like im sooo happy i could cry !!!! I finnally get this stuff... 

  • thx (:

  • this video is so beautiful.

    never in my entire life would i have said anything having to do with calculus is beautiful, but i needed serious help, and this video answered my cries. thank you so much, khan academy.

  • At Khan Academy , the bell never rings! I wanna separably differentiate all day now

    "In Khan We Trust".

  • be my prof pls

  • 3 dislikes? really? If Sal can't make you understand this, nobody can!!!

  • If one integrates with the x side without dividing by y in both sides of the equation, can the equation be solved anyway? It didn't work for me and I guess it cannot be solved, why?

  • You are so helpful. This makes math make sense. Thanks!

  • i don't know what more surprising...you explaining a semester worth's course in one sitting, or why im blowing $200,000 on professors who are good at nothing more than putting me to sleep

  • i had knew anything before watching this then i just got a BB from diff. eqns.. u are a hero!

  • Thanks! Came home from school conpletely lost but you saved me!

  • my webwork asks for y= blah blah but i cant set them to one side :(

  • "We have to separate the wives from the exes" I heard this and lol'd.

  • I don't know nothing about no computers mister.

  • I don't know nothing about no computers mister.

  • how can i solve this Sal? 6xy+e^y+(3x^2+xe^y)y'=0 Please give me advise on this. I'm totally lost.

  • @jakub9983 It's not separable (actually most DEs aren't separable). Look at the videos on exact equations. I think it is exact.

  • @dalcde You are right, its exact. Thank you very much. Its so easy to solve when you know algorithm. :)

  • y are u such a good teacher

  • Is it possible to solve Maxwell's Equations?

  • and now i can be a badass before i start differential equation.

  • we were dividing both sides by y, what about a case when y = 0?

  • STOP!

  • I really need to say "THANKS ALOT MAN!!!" you save my whole entire life!!

  • is it possible to call these 'implicit integrals'?

  • @louwas93 i was wonderin the same tin

  • Are professors bothered by you being 10x more concise than they are?

  • @shaunmikex

    theyJeLLy?

  • @shaunmikex Sadly, I don't think most professors give a crap how well they teach.

  • I don't understand the second step where he takes the derivative =(

  • @rabia22p Both sides were divided by y.

  • Thanks ! 5*

  • Most useful videos i have ever seen on youtube

    Thank you Khan bhai.

  • I swear I am suing my school to get my money back for my EA class to give it to you lol, thanks!

  • My friend and I had our calc teacher keep your website URL on the whiteboard for people to utilize. :)

  • 100th person to rate this vid a perfect 5/5 :D

  • You are a admirable mystery!

  • You would be a GREAT math professor, if you haven't been one. :D

  • You help me soo much!! THX VERY MUCH! YOU ARE A GREAT TEACHER!

  • Teacher of the year :)

  • grate exeplination, this is the first time I understande math and have really intresst in math and want to learn more, thanks allote, you have change the world a grate deal.

    just imagine if all school teachers could teach like you do!!!!

  • thank you so much for this (:

    You cleared up A LOT of confusions that I have about this subject (my teacher who normally doesn't even teach that well was absent today so I was left to my own devices), and now I can do my homework (:

  • how do you know what sinx is?

  • google the "unit circle"

  • @b23571113 Everyone how is tdowning you are homeless-the-sexuals.

    When he substituted-in the initial value of "when x=0, y=1", sin(x) becomes sin(0). The triangle formed when the angle is zero has no vertical, or "opposite" component. Remember SOHCAHTOA? So, sin(0)=0.

    You've probably figured that out by now, but if you had asked, then there are probably other people who've wondered the same thing.

  • thanks!!!!!

  • Damn you are good i never got this shit in class

  • Great Explain : )

  • can anyone confirm that if you make y the subject you get y=e^[(sinx)/3]

  • Dude! I wish you were our lecturer at uni - very helpful indeed.

  • you should teach @ Clark!!! i wish my instructor expained that well....much thanks

  • youre a baller. thanks for the vids

  • Hi i am new to Diff=tions but how come when he divided by y to get rid of y from right hand side, he did not divide the dy/dx by y?

  • He did not need to, since there was something already multiplying the dy/dx. When you have that situation, you only need to divide the multiplying quantity.

  • I think it's because dy/dx is multiplied by (1+2y^2).

  • 5*4=2*x

    divide both sides by 2, when you do this you get rid of the 2 on the right side and you can either divide the 4 by 2 or the 5 by 2 (which would be silly because that would give you a fraction, but the answer would still work out correctly)

    So...

    5*(4/2)=x

    5*2=x

    x=10

    on his example you have two terms multiplied together as well so he chose the "easiest" term to divide into.

  • you are def the man. thanks so much.

  • Thx for the effort man :)

  • super!

  • just when i thought i was screwed, TNX! really helpful.

  • you save lives!!!!!

    Thank You and keep it up!

  • I looooove these videos...

    thank you!!

  • Fantastic, thank you !!!

    I keenly anticipate the numerical solutions, which you have mentioned, for both differential equations and integration.

    Once again, thank you.

  • Thanks for uploading!

  • king sal

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more