Roadfly.com - 2010 BMW X6 M Road Test Review

[iAmInsaine22]

My neighbors have one of those !

[mbciptr]

Find a better driver next time...

[anhuypham]

During the first 32 seconds of the video I can't concentrate on the car.... :(

[chigasaki06]

I honestly think this vehicle is pointless.

[WowzaBoyz]

@chigasaki06 I know, it tries to do two things at once but ends up doing both both half assed. And plus it's ugly imo, BMW's Panamera...

[ro22ss]

"Dumping a Red Bull into your Jolt" well said

[0000WINDOWS]

Did anyone notice that the driver hit the pavement in min 1:29

?????

[32docholiday]

so lemme get this straight i pay $95,000 and then i have to pay extra for a stupid ass camera? WTF

[Roo7llo0ollUAE]

gliched!!



[Dswang93]

Waste of a twin turbo...

[AreaCode978]

I want one. I'm going to have one. I'm getting all A's in community college. Getting ready to transfer to a 4-year school. Getting all A's so I can move out of my house and get a car like this someday.

[kpbrigade]

@AreaCode978 whats a 4 year school?

[AreaCode978]

@kpbrigade Like...a University that you can earn a bachelors degree from.

[ahmdawi]

Description says 0-60 in 4.3...Jessi says 4.7...The review says 4.5. So which one is it?

[Tomrexxx1]

@ahmdawi It depends on the driver, that's why the times are different

[rangerover06sc]

@ahmdawi Accourding to Car and Driver its 4.3, accourding to BMW its 4.5 and from 0-100 kph its 4.7.

[knarula87]

hey this is a copy of original video from Yahoo Autos........hey get some real videos....i am disappointed...

[Slushthetechpenguin]

...sexy? ew

[KGLTF]

Bring More Worries

[bellethon]

During introduction she says 4.7 sec from 0-60mph, during road test.. guy says 4.5 sec from 0-60mph. In Description it says 4.3 sec from 0-60mph. Very concrete answer in this Review

[BMUSIK101]

Waste of money.......as much as i love Bmw

[EccentricE86]

Im not a woman, but thank you for being (or appearing like) a real female enthusiast. You are knowledgeable, and present the facts very well.

[ProSeXyDmX]

lol at 1:30 the guy couldnøt stop in time before he hit the little sideway

[sprite2233]

imo it kinda looks ugly

[97I30T]

3 words: MASSIVE DOUCHER MOBILE!

[myjanuary151987]

The butt of this car is fugly, o.k. tell me I'm wrong.

[373axle]

The only reason why certain BMW fans like the way the X6 looks is because its made by well, BMW. I'd bet on anything if a company like Buick, Nissan, or Ford would build a car with a very similar design, people would think its drop-dead ugly, but since an upscale german carmaker designed this, then many people adopt the "its gotta look good" attitude. With that being said, the X5M looks like a real performance vehicle.

[ebradahusla]

@373axle Very true, the ingenuity under it is next to none and no one can deny that, looks are ugly visibility poor, backseat head room is also poor, sorta like the other fail called Pontiac Aztek, but since its a BMW, it gets a pass. But I think its makes up for the crappy design with great driving dynamics.

[microsoftaddict]

@373axle mmm who knows... i think the x6 might be better for "racing" just because of its shape... besides id much rather a normal v8 x5 over the m version(personal opinion... those weird bucket vents look good on the x6 but are horrible on the x5.)

[fimmyk]

@373axle tbh i dont care if its made by bmw. if it was made by another company with the EXACT desing, i would still love it, though i dont like the interior. i just love muscular, big, aggressive looking cars and i think the x6 is one of the meanest looking cars.

[373axle]

@fimmyk Yea I like how some angles of the X6 look, especially when looking at the front view, but I think many BMW designs such as the X6 are very questionable to say the least.

[lbryan250]

this car is just a mess. we all know we're not gonna go off-road with this car. why not just get a M3?

[memepowers]

in mexico cost $113,000, really expensive

[nekrasovp]

@memepowers 183 414,00 USD in Russia

[saboobuu]

@memepowers do you not mean 113,000 pesos, not dollars

[memepowers]

@saboobuu Nope, it cost 113,000 dollars, its like $1,360,000 pesos

[blazzing4321]

this looks like a big ass car. id take a cayenne or Q5 allday

[TheHawk545]

90,000 is kinda lot for this, they need to lower it. its a very nice car, but a backup cam as an option is a terrible mistake by BMW

[Niche79]

ugly, did honda design this after they finished their crosstour? rofl

[kinjat56]

@Niche79 You have to see it in person. On the next corner to my street there is one owner with white X6 M, and when he is pulling it out of garage in the evening, boy does it look sick. Just see it in person, you would have your thoughts changed.

[droppinsumfudge]

@supercrazy55555 hahaha agreed

[strife2xlr8]

Holy hell 12-17mpg?

[Restarea11019V]

 bmw x6 show the world whos BOSS on thd raod

[HellaRandomVideos]

Looks like a retard on steroids

[jwatwater]

honestly, $90k, and a rear view camera is an OPTION? out of ur fucking mind BMW

[tgamirov]

looks like an obese 3-series sedan

[AWDfreak]

It's a shame that it doesn't have a manual transmission. Almost no SUVs have manuals anymore... If the M5 had a manual option, every M-powered car should!

[JohnLRice]

Jessi is the real deal! When she isn't on camera or at least talking, I'm 75% less interesting in these videos! ;-)

[5Qu1Z33r]

@JohnLRice This is a car show, so go watch some porn for fucks sake. Do i need to give you an url? Hint - it ends with "tube" as well.

[JohnLRice]

@5Qu1Z33r LOL! Chill, fag! ;-)

[JohnLRice]

@5Qu1Z33r Hey, watch the language! There are children and ladies present! (meaning YOU! ;-)

Q3 1v1, noob! name the server! ;-)

[5Qu1Z33r]

@JohnLRice Ok, QL - Moscow #2

[venom5809]

Damn Jessi looks a 1000 times better than this thing.

I don't get BMW, they will make just about everything with an M option but for some reason, the 7 series gets no love.

That just makes no sense.

Two different "SUV" Ms but no 7 series M.

That is just stupid.

[bigfattutti]

@venom5809 M7 is not needed, if you need a powerful 7 series car either get a B7 or a 760Li.

[karlmalone11]

The rear tires are not wider than a viper, as keviinn pointed out, vipers have 345 rear widths....i think you guys need an editing team.

[keviiinn]

doesn't a Viper also come with 325 tires in the rear? or even 345?

[karlmalone11]

@keviiinn vipers have 345 rear width

[sdijnfpo0jaisf]

$95,000!??!?! this thing better blow me at least once a day for that price!

[HomesliceDrummer]

@sdijnfpo0jaisf

550hp will get you off, don't worry.

[urwisss1]

@sdijnfpo0jaisf

In Poland: basic X6: $105000; X6 M: $183000 :)

[paulb4uk]

This thing is horrid and pointless a bad move by bmw.

[bigretardhalo]

Wow I guess I was right about the X6 hybrid being pointless.. the X6M out powers it by 70 horse.... outruns it by a second to 60MPH and gives up a whopping 2MPG on the highway.

[igeekone]

The M6 is much more capable. This doesn't make much sense.

[oldschool1]

"Dumping your Red Bull into your Jolt." Nice analogy. :)

[jstnhnh]

I would've preferred that they made a Z4M over this.

[illricky]

Not a fan of the iDrive. Nor am I a fan of the new interior of BMW overall -- they should go back to keeping it simple.

[librano]

3:32 you mean choice vehicle for douche bags?...

[B1GWHITE]

This is one amazing car