Added: 3 years ago
From: nano2hybrids
Views: 17,260
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (20)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Thank you for this series! its was very informative, and i watched them all.

  • I love the way they place the spaghetti in the same position as the nanotubes

  • Comment removed

  • @JesterFarce Sorry your comment was deleted for some unknown reason.

    "You used spaghetti as an example to explain the different properties of the two carbon nanotube variants - would it be correct in saying that the Arc-discharge method produces more brittle nanotubes, while CVD produces more flexibility in their composition? So wouldn't CVD actually be more useful in eventually constructing useful applications in this technology?..."

  • The spaguetti/nanotube analogy refers only to the appearance but not the properties!

  • Thumbs up if you think nicole should of been naked.

    For science.

  • that SEM is one piece of AMAZING machinery.

    humans are so clever its unreal (well some of us)

  • Since the atoms could not be seen, how do they know the atomic structure?

  • Ok yeah nanotubes great but....hm.did u fuck nicole?

  • I WANT THAT TELESCOPE!!!

    OMG... its AWESOME!

  • haha women doing science? yea right!

  • are they so tiny they would go inside your skins pores? also when was this type of microscope invented? that allowed you to see the tubes

  • @RebirthWoWGuild

    Yes. Each tube is only a few atoms wide and can't be seen without a microscope whereas your pores are easily seen by the unaided eye.

    You'll have to look up when the TEM was invented because I don't remember.

  • oh gawd its a hot scientist! :D

  • wouldn't you like if she "probe" into you. hahahaha.

  • nahhhh i was thinking in probing her with my tool lol

  • Thank you for the reply and suggestions

  • Hello all, Well then the conclusion of the video is that the arc discharge one gives us the kind structure we want while the CVD comes in its own bizarre way

  • Arc-discharge gives straighter tubes but does not mean that is what we want necessary. For some applications we may want defected tubes (for example if you want attached other molecules to the tube).

    But most importantly, by arc-discharge a lot of byproducts are produced and it is difficult to produce large quantities of tubes.

    CVD produces "wavier" tubes but in higher quantities and like "growing" from a carpet which is more useful for some applications. CVD is easier for mass production.

  • Where are the rest of the series?

  • Hi Allgoo19,

    I have been very busy this last month, so I haven't got time to finish the last two videos.

    But keep tuned! I will upload them in January -consider them your late Xmas present ;)

    Irene

  • Thanks! I'll be really looking forward to it!

    It's an exciting material, new technology that none of us alive today will live long enough to see its full potential.

Loading...
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more