@JesterFarce Sorry your comment was deleted for some unknown reason.
"You used spaghetti as an example to explain the different properties of the two carbon nanotube variants - would it be correct in saying that the Arc-discharge method produces more brittle nanotubes, while CVD produces more flexibility in their composition? So wouldn't CVD actually be more useful in eventually constructing useful applications in this technology?..."
Hello all, Well then the conclusion of the video is that the arc discharge one gives us the kind structure we want while the CVD comes in its own bizarre way
Arc-discharge gives straighter tubes but does not mean that is what we want necessary. For some applications we may want defected tubes (for example if you want attached other molecules to the tube).
But most importantly, by arc-discharge a lot of byproducts are produced and it is difficult to produce large quantities of tubes.
CVD produces "wavier" tubes but in higher quantities and like "growing" from a carpet which is more useful for some applications. CVD is easier for mass production.
Thank you for this series! its was very informative, and i watched them all.
SPIKEwillKILL 1 month ago
I love the way they place the spaghetti in the same position as the nanotubes
ImJustSlime 2 months ago
Comment removed
JesterFarce 7 months ago
@JesterFarce Sorry your comment was deleted for some unknown reason.
"You used spaghetti as an example to explain the different properties of the two carbon nanotube variants - would it be correct in saying that the Arc-discharge method produces more brittle nanotubes, while CVD produces more flexibility in their composition? So wouldn't CVD actually be more useful in eventually constructing useful applications in this technology?..."
TheSpanishkoala 7 months ago
The spaguetti/nanotube analogy refers only to the appearance but not the properties!
TheSpanishkoala 7 months ago
Thumbs up if you think nicole should of been naked.
For science.
agun17 8 months ago
that SEM is one piece of AMAZING machinery.
humans are so clever its unreal (well some of us)
mcRioRemedy 8 months ago
Since the atoms could not be seen, how do they know the atomic structure?
abobjenkins 8 months ago
Ok yeah nanotubes great but....hm.did u fuck nicole?
DrSAM69 10 months ago
I WANT THAT TELESCOPE!!!
OMG... its AWESOME!
pufixas 1 year ago
haha women doing science? yea right!
valeo626 2 years ago
are they so tiny they would go inside your skins pores? also when was this type of microscope invented? that allowed you to see the tubes
RebirthWoWGuild 2 years ago
@RebirthWoWGuild
Yes. Each tube is only a few atoms wide and can't be seen without a microscope whereas your pores are easily seen by the unaided eye.
You'll have to look up when the TEM was invented because I don't remember.
wado1942 2 years ago
oh gawd its a hot scientist! :D
mmonnerat 2 years ago
wouldn't you like if she "probe" into you. hahahaha.
wildcritic 2 years ago
nahhhh i was thinking in probing her with my tool lol
mmonnerat 2 years ago
Thank you for the reply and suggestions
Prabu1863 2 years ago
Hello all, Well then the conclusion of the video is that the arc discharge one gives us the kind structure we want while the CVD comes in its own bizarre way
Prabu1863 2 years ago
Arc-discharge gives straighter tubes but does not mean that is what we want necessary. For some applications we may want defected tubes (for example if you want attached other molecules to the tube).
But most importantly, by arc-discharge a lot of byproducts are produced and it is difficult to produce large quantities of tubes.
CVD produces "wavier" tubes but in higher quantities and like "growing" from a carpet which is more useful for some applications. CVD is easier for mass production.
nano2hybrids 2 years ago
Where are the rest of the series?
allgoo19 3 years ago
Hi Allgoo19,
I have been very busy this last month, so I haven't got time to finish the last two videos.
But keep tuned! I will upload them in January -consider them your late Xmas present ;)
Irene
nano2hybrids 3 years ago
Thanks! I'll be really looking forward to it!
It's an exciting material, new technology that none of us alive today will live long enough to see its full potential.
allgoo19 3 years ago