Added: 4 years ago
From: LifeInProvincetownTV
Views: 50,829
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:
see all

All Comments (326)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Not only He was gorgeous, He was a wonderful soul for all the people who care for Him and He care about!

    I really miss His great persona in this world, He really make a diference in the world just by been John John!

  • They blocked me from leaving any J.FK. quotes on youtube???? I think he was the best President Ever!!!! Even when I tried creating a new account?

  • He was a good speaker. Would have been effective had he led the movement.

  • This is nice, seeing as how his dad and uncle were very influential in the civil rights movement. Gay equality is really like the civil rights movement of today!

  • This is so great.

    Thanks for posting this.

  • Wow, so ahead of his time.

  • I sort of miss the Kennedys.

  • @Angellicationify *ehem* bush did over 600 signing statements which basically allows him to take laws passed in congress and modify them. So basically when bush didn't like a law he could ignore it or change it entirely so it was the way he liked it, which is what your beef with Obama is.  Second it not that they aren't enforcing it. They are trying to prove that it is unconstitutional do to the fact it violates civil rights. Marriage is a civil right (loving v. Virgina.)

  • Defense of Marriage Act is the short title of a federal law of the United States signed into law by President Bill Clinton on September 21, 1996, which is a federal law defining a marriage between a man and a women.

    .

    In February, President Obama announced that he would not enforce this Act. He has taken another power grab for the Executive Branch by not following our Constitution, but choosing which laws to follow and which not to.

    .

    Just imagine if he did that for Obamacare.

    .

    Allen West 2012

  • He was a great man. Miss him very much.

  • very ture - his death was such a tragic loss - because just listening to him talk here - you can clearly see that the USA would have been such an important - relevant - worth while country - today in 2011 it is telling to see those who promote homophobia over access to health care - education - employment - income somehow manage to win elections and hold office of great power - as an outreach worker back in 1980's I looked to future hope that I would see an end to homophobia - but it is worse

  • he had a slight lisp.. i never knew that lol

  • If this man had been president America would have ruled the world, and everyone would have loved them for it.

    JFK jr is perfect in every way. He's smart, well-spoken and charismatic. There is no way the tea-baggers would have gotten away with their shit if john had been on the scene. He had the presence and respect. It's amazing how one person can be so vital to change and progression.

    Also, religion is bullshit.

  • I told my mum I was gay last night after yeas of worrying about it and she said fine and went about her business as if I had just told her the time lol

  • @centralviva Good for you for coming out. It is the only way things will change. It takes our own courage to be what we are first before the world will have courage to appreciate us. never forget you are worth it. where r u from? Do you have other gay friends or groups to hang with? I'm glad you liked my video of JFK Jr. tim

  • @ipanther17 I live away from home and everywhere else i'm out but until recently not to my family but they have been incredibly supportive considering I come from a very conservative religious rural place. Thanks for the support too we must unite as a community:)

  • his last assignment for George magazine was covering Martha's Vineyard

  • What could have been...

    He could have been a powerful voice against the Tea Baggers, even President.

  • @PeaceJustice4ever i totaly agree i would have destroyed the tea party

  • so hot!!

  • All the good people are killed...

  • JFK JR was also assassinated.

  • Its a shame he died! He would have been president by now and US would be a more progresive country

  • @rodvarmo Another dumb liberal comment! It just never ends with you clowns! JFK Jr. would have never even made it to 'low office' let alone becoming a U.S. President!

  • jfk jr was bi , that is a fact ask people who knew him when he went to brown , very sad that he died so young

  • @bearcub410 LOL??????????????????? Bi?

  • there goes the 43rd, 44th or 45 president of the United States had he lived. sad to think what he, bobby and others like MLK could have done had they been around. what gets me mad is a person like george w bush is put in place by luck or god to determine human history for the better or worse,,, and he chooses the latter.

  • No Bush wasn't put in place by luck or God, but by the bullet box. He, his father, Nixon and others murdered their way into the White House. Same thing Clinton. Just research it. It's all there. They murdered history, then re-wrote it to suit themselves.

  • @pat442389 abso-frickin-lutely - to everything you said.

    John, we hardly knew ye.

  • @pat442389 You are delusional. JFK Jr. was woefully incompetent. He would never have come even close to becoming a U.S. president. Also if Gore had defeated Bush in 2000 Saddam Hussein would still be in power in Iraq! You have Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and now Obama who ARE ALL pathetic presidents.

  • @royalclass23548 so wasnt nixon, ford reagan bush and bsh. actually ronald reagan was the worse president in the last 50 years right behind him is bush jr. reagan let pakistan go nuclear, funded and gave weapons to terrorists including the taliban, let wall st and big banks take over, satarted the whole "trickle down" economy by giving the super rich tax breaks in hopes it would stimulate jobs. he didnt end the cold war, russia collapsed and his CIA didnt foresee it. JFK greatest pres last 50yrs

  • @pat442389 Feb.6-7/09 Gallup Poll question: If you had to choose, which one of these U.S. Presidents would you regard as the greatest --George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Roosevelt, John Kennedy, or Ronald Reagan? Results were: Reagan=24%, Kennedy=22%, Lincoln=22%, Roosevelt=18%, Washington=9%. As you can see your view on Reagan is directly opposite of what poll respondents believe.

  • @royalclass23548 I believe it's not too difficult to understand that 50% of the U.S population would, by definition, be less than average. That point being made, I think it's pretty clear where that 24% who picked Reagan would fall, and it certainly wouldn't be in the upper half.

  • @royalclass23548 hahahahahahahahahahh where was this pole conducted? at a reagan family reunion? reagans an awful president, actually bush sr is much better then him. the list of greats not in any order is Washington, LIncoln, FDR, Kennedy, Teddy Roosevelt and Jefferson. reagan is credited with ending the cold war but he didnt, he let pakistan go nuclear which is a huge problem, the iran contras, oct surprise, gun/ drug trafficing, savings & loan scandal. he tripled the debt

  • @royalclass23548 Sadam Hussein could have been contained on the cheap, instead of there being thousands of dead American soldiers, hundreds of thousands wounded physically & mentally, over 2,000,000 dead or displaced Iraqi citizens(who are also human beings,despite what your rah-rah supposedly loving Christian militaristic views might otherwise feel). Bush also exposed the limits of our military to the world, at nearly a trillion dollars in cost, so that nations like N. Korea now spit at us.

  • @pat442389 fucking liberal

  • @MyAccount4TrollingU yeah ok great comment. its ppl like you who ruin this country. you dont educate yourself on candidates, the facts and blindly support all military action. you claim everyone else is a liberal pussy if we dont want to blindly bomb a country that you dont have enough sense to think hmm what happens after we bomb the shit outta this country? what happens to the american image? you claim reagan was this all american guy who never raised the debt or taxes. well he did both buddy

  • @pat442389 You need medicine, you nutbar.

  • @pat442389 fuck you

  • Comment removed

  • @MiamiIndianTribe Good thing you removed that, it was very embarrassing for you.

  • Comment removed

  • I hope the Kennedy's continue in politics. They are the liberal hard-hitting empire of the political scene, one that we need.

  • Comment removed

  • America needs to protect his sister Carolyn. they already threaten her and she is the last of JFK's

    children. We need her and for her children to be safe! so again fuck the bushes!

  • @nblbasses Carolyn Kennedy will have to protect herself. It is not the responsibility of 'America' to protect her. All democratic presidents from Johnson, Carter, Clinton, and now Obama are scum.

  • Lets be real the government killed him! Mother fuckers. The Bushes had a hand in it and I tired of all the shit and cover ups. They wanted to make sure that george asshole bushes would be the next president. Its about time the truth comes out.

    come and get me you assholes

  • yay! Go John!

  • I miss JFK Jr and I will now miss Ted. RIP. :-(

  • damn now that teddys gone there arent any good kennedys left

  • He got drunk and drove off a bridge and his passenger drowned. Tragic and horrible, but not unforgiving, especially after all these years and all that Teddy did after that. You must not believe in Christianity. Right?

  • religion posions innocent minds, religion is holding the world back, relgion is causing wars, religion is all in the head, religion gives you nothing exceptfalse belief.

  • Why can't people agree to disagree? If homosexuality is against one's religion, other's should respect that w/o attacking them and if people are advocates for gay rights, people should respect them for that as well. Not everyone is going to see eye to eye but don't attack each other for it. Not all Christians are judgemental haters and not all gay people are extremists. RIP JFK Jr.

  • Why should people respect bigotry rooted in late bronze age sorcery? Please. The argument against gay rights is one that finds moral justification by means of religious intolerance.

  • Insulting the religious convictions of others is not going to get society very far either. It's just as bad as the ignorance against gays you are referring to. Sorry for trying to encourage mutual respect...

  • Calling a spade is a spade is not insulting. Religion receives undeserved respect and is declared immune from criticism. It is OK too deny gay rights on the grounds because of religion but WRONG to call the Christianity a hodgepodge of myths floating around the mediterranean sea thousands of years ago? And societal progression, if we the church still had its way we would still be burning supposed witches and believing the sun orbits the earth.

  • Calling for mutual respect is admirable, and has it's place. However, try to keep in mind the difficult postion that gays are in. Saying that you are gay can be grounds for job dismissal in 30 states. Hate crimes against gays continue at an unacceptably high rate. Gays cannot serve in the military. Upon family requests, many hospitals continue to ban visits by a gay patient's partner .Most gays lack simple domestic partnership benefits. And so on. How often are we supposed to "grin and bear it?"

  • To monuorah- Regarding your quote: "Why can't people agree to disagree?" What follows is not an effort at sarcasm, but an honest effort to explain why your quote misses the mark. It's clear you are expressing a sincere concern. However, imagine trying that quote on the Cherokee while they were trekking the "Trail of Tears" or to soothe southern Blacks who simply wanted to vote.Or perhaps, picture the Pharaoh saying those words to Moses regarding the issue of slavery. We're talking basic rights.

  • As an African American, I know exactlly what discrimination is - and not once have I said that what the gay population is experiencing is anything but discrimination so please don't patronize me as if I've said otherwise. I was talking about the fundamental debate regarding homosexuality. Clearly one side believes its fine, the other side doesn't. I'm just saying both sides have the right to speak their mind - in no way does that mean hindering the gay community of fighting for their rights.

  • I was also addressing an individual who blatantly disrespected my belief system. Not once did I say anything against the gay community and I get slammed with derogatory statements regarding my faith. Couldn't one argue that that is wrong too? Insulting one another is not going to get anything done and it is really immature of both sides to behave that way. That's all I was saying.

  • To monuorah-The Book of Mormon states that people of dark skin are inferior,& were given dark skin from God as punishment for their evil behavior. Many Mormons today are of that belief. Would you accept the phrase, "Why can't people agree to disagree?", from a such a Mormon? Whether you accept my next statement as patronizing or not, sorry: I just don't accept that Mormon position as anything but condoning bigotry, even though it's religious based. It is disgraceful discrimination,nothing else.

  • Oh, if only Johnny were alive today to partner with Sean Penn, Ellen, other celebrities and open minded politicians to advocate for the rights of all American citizens. To the political right wing Christians: your ugly hatred continues to show itself. What about "Do unto others,,,,,,and (hey) "Love thy neighbor".

  • I agree!

  • As a Christian and a human rights supporter I strongly agree. People need to quit fearing over nonsense, and begin to tolerate at long last. God bless John-John for all the things he did in his brief life. He is what America stands for.

  • That is waht is called "saying alot...but not saying much of anything either" born politician that one was

  • Why the hell would you want to marry someone your not attracted to? Why the hell would you want to marry someone you merely consider a friend? So why the hell do you have the right to preach from God's lips, and tell me I must not love? You are a sinner. You who speaks lies, and spreads hate against those that merely wish to live. To live a life of peace and justice. Unlike your vision of the world. Where everyone's either an ignorant bigot, or hiding away in the closet.

  • Being gay isn't mere lust for the same sex! Your born attracted to the same sex. I'm not going to go hide in a closet just because your self dictating beliefs. I'm attracted to men. I happen to have a higher voice too, hmm, I wonder why? I'm also not into sports. I'm also into fashion. Yes, I admit, I'm pretty similar to the stereotypical gay portrayed in the media. Why the hell are you so interested in who I like.

  • I never knew about a person being gay until my dad told me back in the early 80's that Elton John is gay and explained it to me because I always had a huge crush on Elton and I never thought nothing more of it. But you know what: I'm a proud 45 year old widowed with two teenagers and for the record I think John F. Kennedy Jr. was oh so,so cute! Oh, I still love Elton!

  • @TelepathicPebble

    "Your born attracted to the same sex. I'm attracted to men. I happen to have a higher voice too, hmm, I wonder why? I'm also not into sports. I'm also into fashion. "

    How do you know you were "born attracted to the same sex"? And just because you "have a higher voice and don't like sports and like fashion" why should that mean anything???

  • @TelepathicPebble That is incorrect. Sexual attraction does not start when you are born. It starts in puberty. 

  • If anything you're cherry picking thru the Bible. Jesus changed alot of things ,such as Moses law's on divrce,and how we covet or obtain riches and power(Slavery is power). But Jesus never changed any moral laws,and if you're cherry picking ,and saying its ok to be gay,than incest and beastality should be ok to you to. Since God put all 3 in the same catergory. He did'nt say well its ok to be gay,but don't commit incest. He said all 3 were abominations.

  • Jesus DID change moral laws. It went straight from 'an eye for an eye' to 'turn the other cheek'. That is a moral law. BUT Jesus NEVER EVER at ANY moment mentioned homosexuality. He changed A LOT. The God of the Old Testament was angry and cruel. The God of the New Testament was ALL-LOVING. Judge not lest ye be judged. But we are NOT sinning by loving who we love. It's NOT merely desire, as you think. It IS love. And love, according to both God and Jesus is NEVER wrong.

  • We can control our desire's,pray about it. Just because you have homosexual desire's does'nt mean you have to act on them,its just as hard for me to avoid temptation with a woman,as it is for you with a man. But if we pray and turn to God we can overcome our sins. The God of the OT and NT are the same God. We can't ignore Gods law,and call him a liar,if being gay was ok,we would also have to accept incest,as well as beastality .

  • Maybe that law,but that was more of a civic law. But if you care about every Christian you don't want to see them commiting these kind of sins. What if you adopted a son,and your son grew up to marry his cousin,would'nt that bother you?..If if a guy told you,i love Jesus,but my sister is the only woman i love ,God just made me that way,would you agree with him?..Some people really do love and marry their cousins and other family members. But its not Gods will.

  • Also, constantly comparing homosexuality to incest and beastiality is, even though you'll argue, horribly inaccurate. Beastility involves one human and one animal, which has NO choice in the matter. In essance, that is rape. As for incest, it can result and severe and horrible mutations in offspring. Homosexuality, however, involves two consenting adults, hopefully in love with one another, and harms NO ONE involved. You can claim all you want that God is against it. But you ARE wrong.

  • To playoyoft- There is nothing in the Bible about not being allowed to marry your cousin. That is a human rule, based on the belief that such a marriage would lend to the birth of deformed children. Incidentally, Abraham, Solomon, & King David were all direct ancestors of Jesus (according to virtually all Christian Biblical scholars). All 3 were also polygamists. Hence Jesus was born of polygamists(I wonder how he felt about that). I don't condone polygamy, but the Bible offers no restrictions.

  • @paulsboroman You are completely wrong on that one. There was no blood relationship between Jesus and the parents (Joseph & Mary) who raised him.

  • @royalclass23548 Sorry,but all serious Christian Biblical scholars claim that the lineage of Jesus started with Abraham,travelled through Solomon,then David,& ultimately to Mary,thus fulfilling the prophesies of the Old Test. KIngs David & Solomon were polygamists.Also through line of Jesus was Lot,who had sex with his 2 daughters when he was drunk.He was the supposed good man that God saved from the destruction of Sodom. &are you saying that as Jesus gestated in Mary's womb,no fluids exchanged?

  • Comment removed

  • @paulsboroman Jesus was conceived by the Holy Spirit in Mary's womb. He was not conceived as a result of intercourse between Mary and Joseph. Therefore there is no blood relationship to speak of between Him and Mary & Joseph.  Mary was only a vessel to carry Jesus to birth. Also it is a known fact that babies have their own separate blood supply at all times. Also all the biblical information on the lineage of Jesus was for prophetic purposes only.

  • @royalclass23548 Incidentally, Solomon was also a massive slave owner, and Abraham a polygamist. I'm just saying couldn't God pick a better lineage than that pack of miscreants. I find it especially comical these characters are given such premium status in the Old Testament. None however are worse than Moses and the Apostle Paul, both whom promoted slavery, sexism, and homophobia under the guise of speaking for God. Sadly, Moses even promoted genocide and racism. Quite a sad Biblical legacy.

  • @paulsboroman >> Moses never committed Genocide. Genocide was first coined by Lemkin in 1944 and adopted by the UN in 1948. It was incorporated as part of international laws that members of the present civilized world must uphold. Moses was the leader of a bronze age people with sensibilities far different from our times. What you may call genocide today was plain survival instinct by people faced with annihilation themselves. Continued >

  • @royalclass23548 TAKE THE TIME TO READ: Deuteronomy 20 v 10-18. These words are spoken by Moses, supposedly expressing the will of God. If that doesn't promote genocide, then what the hell is it doing?! The passage clearly has God demanding enslavement, massacre, and stealing of all property of any cities' inhabitants in existence that has a religion different to that of the Jews. In Leviticus 25: 44-46, Moses also states it is acceptable to enslave anyone except an Israelite. Disgraceful!

  • @paulsboroman, > continued > Please be informed, the world almost 4000 years ago was far more dangerous and crueler than what we have at present nor did it have the protection of international arbitration or judicial bodies.

    Homosexuality is obviously perversion. Of course Paul stood against it. Anyway, as usual non-christians like yourself are taking biblical scriptures out of the context they were written in an attempt to discredit it.

  • @royalclass23548 These passages may be out of context for you, but not for me. READ THEM! Try 1 Timothy 6 1-2, where the apostle Paul states"Slaves should serve and honor their masters, especially if the masters are believers." Paul also captures a runaway slave, uses him, & then offers to send him back to his real master (see Book of Philemon, where Paul also states he considered keeping the slave for himself. So this pro-slavery homophobe, is thinking about stealing another's property.

  • @royalclass23548 Your own homophobia is a perversion. Am I supposed to congratulate you for adhering to religious concepts whose ancient outdated thought process also happens to support your personal archaic attitudes about homosexuality? Am I to be in awe that you worship a text that decidely promotes genocide (don't forget the Great Flood either), slavery (in both OT & NT), sexism, and racism? Am I to be surprised that such a text is also homophobic?

  • @royalclass23548 The more technical answer is this: the placenta is the organ that attaches the developing embryo or fetus to the uterus (womb) and is composed of maternal and embryonic tissue, it links the blood supply of the embryo to the blood supply of the mother, allowing the exchange of oxygen, nutrients, and waste products. There is no exchange of blood, but clearly an exchange of fluids, which was my only claim.

  • I just told you i'm a sinner,we all are sinners.And alot of people would be more than right to rebuke me for my sins. However your logic that i'm breaking a commandment by speaking out against homosexuality is flawed . You can't judge a sin. The term servant was used in the Bible,and the servants were not based on racism or hate . Jesus changed alot of things. Jesus told the disciples not to Lord over other's as the Gentile's. So no we would not own slaves now.

  • And Jesus NEVER said ANYTHING about homosexuality. Nothing at all. The only mentions of homosexuality was in the Old Testament and in Corinthians. The Old Testament was changed by Jesus, as you just admitted. And the Corinthians has been proven by most Biblical scholars to mean a political merging rather than homosexuality. So, if you can admit that Jesus changed a lot of things, you NEED to realize that Jesus changed THAT too.

  • You're misinterpreting what i'm trying to convey. Jesus never mentioned homosexuality,thats correct,so that means homosexuality is still a sin. Jesus changed the mosaic law,he did'nt come to abolish the OT laws,but by change i mean he stregthened them . Jesus also never mentioned beastality or incest, do you support a man marrying his sister? Or another man sleeping with an animal?.By change ,i mean Jesus added to the law,he never took away from any of God's moral laws.

  • Ok. Here's what the fact is. Time's are changing and you're trying to do what you think is right. However, you are pushing people further and further away from God. I'm a gay Christian and I'm comfortable with that. Very very comfortable. I pray to God every single night before I go to sleep. Because I love Him and He loves me. And He loves me how he made me. He made me gay. Being gay is what I am and I have NO control what so ever over that. At all.

  • gay people are treated like blacks were.

  • There are serious consequences for speaking of the dead. careful careful

  • JFK Jr isn't known for making wise decisions now, is he? I mean, being dead from his own mistakes is a telltale sign of someone that maybe you shouldn't trust so much.

  • Oh, and also, God loves all, even gays. LOVE is NEVER wrong. Judge not lest ye be judged, my friends. Seems people forget the verses they need to in order to keep their hate-mongering Bible verses in context.

  • Ok i agree with you God loves gays,but he hates homosexuality. Jesus said love your enemy,i can't hate a gay man or lesbian woman,i can't hate a serial killer,God loves criminals to. But God hate's their sins,so as Christians we have the right to hate homosexuality,and murder,but not homosexuals and serial killers.

  • There's a few problems there though. Hate extends, that's the horrible power of it. And that hate causes sadness and inequality. And far too many Christians forget ALL the other Leviticus passages that speak of sinning that aren't still followed today. Do you hate your wife if she disobeys you? Do you hate people that wear more than one type of material in their clothing? Do you hate those that eat pigs or shellfish? It's in the Bible, however, it was written for a different time.

  • It's not right or normal to raise a child like that. There were ceremonial or ritaul laws...the one's on homosexuality,incest,and beastality were moral.The one's on shellfish were ceremonial,if people accept homosexuality,they should also accept incest,and beastality,which are viwed by God as eqaul sins to homosexuality.

  • Leave the judgement to god and love everyone as Jesus did - problem solved

  • I do love everyone,but i can't love sin. Jesus was so strict against sin,and he hated sin,as God does. I hate the sin's that i commit..You're right love everyone ,maybe i have no right to judge any gay man or rapist,but i still can't ignore evil,and say well i love everybody so rape,incest and beastality and witchcraft and homosexuality,i would be a liar if i said i loved you but did'nt mind you being gay,or being a satanist.

  • Oh so because I'm gay I'm a sinner aye? You know it's not a choice right? One day during puberty you find out that unlike other boys you aren't attracted to girls. Instead your physically attracted to the same sex. It's no sin to have a different eye for beauty. Is it a choice for a straight guy to be attracted to girls? No. So neither is it a choice for gay guys to be attracted to other guys.

    Who are you to say I must not love? That I must forever hide away?

  • Alot of things in life seem as if we have no control them,Satan influence's us and put's horrible thoughts in our head. One guy on the news said he had a desire to rape and could'nt control it. But God is in control,so you can't help your feelings,but you can love a woman and honor God. I don't hate you,i'm not here to call you a fag,i hate homosexuality with a passion,but i don't hate you.

  • And I don't hate you either. I honestly respect you completely. However, even if you hate homosexuality, there really is no reason to come here and try to make us feel horrible for being who we are. You will not 'save' anyone here because your tactics just don't work. We, as gays, have ALL heard these arguments time and time again and NONE of us have REALLY changed our sexuality, even those that CLAIM they did. It is impossible to change what is hardwired into us.

  • I respect you, playboyoft, and I respect your opinion. However, your belief that we are sinning is not what we believe. No matter what verses you throw at us, we KNOW we were born the way we were born. I am attracted to other men, not to spite God, but because I just AM. BUT, comparing being gay to satanism is completely off the charts. We are not a religion that worship Satan and go against God. We are people searching for love just like you. We just find that love from the same sex.

  • Some people say that there is Scientific evidence that some people were born evil,but i refuse to believe that,just as i refuse to believe you were born gay. Well in a way we're all sinning,i'm sinning to. I'm sure you could rebuke my lifestyle also, but i'm telling you,that you can find love with a woman,and be the man God created you to be .All sexual desire is not good,love has nothing to do with sex. You may desire a man,but you can love and be with a woman.

  • BUT, if we desire men, as you claim, if we go against that desire that GOD gave us, we'll be sinning even more for denying the way He made us. God DID create us in his image, and even though YOU think we are choosing to be discriminated against and even though YOU can't see that we fight for OUR rights and our very RIGHT to exist from people like you, we keep fighting on. Because one sweet day, YOU and EVERYONE else will learn the error of your ways. God bless you, sir.

  • Yeah, because everyone that dies in plane crashes after they support the rights of millions of people are TOTALLY being killed by God for supporting those 'nasty guys'.  Completely valid and thought provoking argument, there, bornondate1968.

  • YES! A politician that understands!

  • Rock on Gay Rights.. ITS ALL COMING SOON

  • I agree, Freedom of speech is huge if someone wants to believe black people belong in the fields as slaves they have the right too, If they want to think women belong in the kitch and are less of humans they can? If they want to think Gays&Lesbians are gross and sinners they can... BUT NO ONE HAS THE RIGHT TO FORCE THEIR OPINIONS/LIFESTYLES OFF ON SOMEONE ELSE ESPECIALLY THROUGH OUR FEDERAL GOVERMENT- WHICH IS THERE FOR ALL OF US AND TO PROTECT ALL OF US

  • The difference being that someone with small breasts or penis is NOT systematically treated different in law, employment, housing, adoption, health care etc etc etc.

  • If gay people want eqaul employment,and oppertunity ok,but why do gay rights groups come after the music industry,and tv shows ,when they call a gay person a faggot . Women with small breast get made fun of,and on tv shows and music a guy with small penis gets laughed at. And there's no human rights group for them. Everyone deserves Healthcare,and eqaul oppetunity,but i don't think gay people should adopt kids,(not because gays hurt kids,but because a child needs a mom and a dad,not 2 dads

  • It's not merely being made fun of. When a women gets made fun of for small breasts or a man for a small penis, the hatred behind it isn't dangerous. However, the extreme anger and hatred from a horrible word like 'faggot' stems from a very deeply rooted disrespect that, for many people, can become incredibly dangerous for the safetly of the 'faggot' they are attacking.

  • Yeah, I myself am gay and am still in school. ANd every time some kid calls me a fag I cry inside. I've even thought of suicide. Because all around me everyday these inconsiderate little homophobes try to tell me I'm a deformity or that I should "go suck a cock". This hate must be stopped. I don't want to live in a world where I wake to hateful glares and nasty words.

  • I went through the same things when I was in high school, but believe me, TelepathicPebble, it gets better. And we're living in quite a historic time for homosexuals. We're on the front page now. We're achieving equality. I wouldn't be surprised if, within the next 10-15 years, every state will have legalized same sex marriage. I'm sorry you're going through the harassment, but keep on fighting. Remember, you ARE stronger than these hatemongers. You ARE better.

  • I respect you to,i understand that sin is not an easy thing to avoid. But i'm against not just homosexuality,but the way the majority of the world has became,false religon,hate,and the secular people who don't even believe in God. I'm against my own sins also,but i feel every gay man,God created him to be a man,and instead of insulting them ,we need to help them find women and be men. God made sex so we could reproduce,sex has nothing to do with love,i believe you can love a woman.

  • God said homosexuality is synanomous with beastality,and incest,and he put them all in the same category . I believe God not you. I don't want gay people,porn stars or criminals to go to hell. But i'll always be against murder,homosexuality,and any other sin. I'm more against straight people that accept homosexuality,than gay people tha are gay. At least homosexuals are struggling with that sin,they have a excuse,whats yours?

  • Well alot of our attractions are by choice,had i been raised in an asian community i'd perfer asian women.But since i was raised around mexican women,i perfer them over most women. But do u feel we have no control over our actions? You may have homosexual desire,but that does'nt mean you have to act on your lust. I've lusted after women,but do u think God would forgive me if i had premartial sex and said i could'nt help it?.We have the power to change.

  • Again, I will reiterate, homosexuals do not merely LUST. We love. We love the same sex just as you love the opposite sex. Now. Put it this way. Let's say we lived in a world where heterosexuality just happened to be a 'sin' in the eyes of many of the 'just' homosexuals. Would you honestly tell me that you'd be able to put aside not only your lust, but also your ABSOLUTE love for a woman? The answer is no. And NO ONE should ever be forced to put aside love. It's too pure and good.

  • @playboyoft Seriously dude, If you died and went to hell, no one would care, so why do you care if we do?

  • And as for adoption. That argument claims that all children with only one mother or one father shouldn't have children either.  So single parent households should be giving up their children?

  • he was so hot!!!! RIP you sexxxy man

  • would our founding fathers agree with gay marriage

  • NO. and they wouldn't have agreed on freedom of slaves, what's your point?

  • well not all of our founding fathers agreed with slavery,i dont agree with gay mairage but unlike some people i still consider them a human being

  • well said landlord,

    As a homosexual, I don't think Gay "Marriage" should be allowed, rather... a Gay Unionization because I think Marriage is a religious thing. Just to be tolerated and acknowledged, that is all we are looking for.

    Thanks for seeing us as one.

  • I met john when he came to Rome and milan.

    I was lucky to meet him to london

    john was very gentleman and handsome

  • Does anyone here think he wasn't JFK's legitimate son? I sure think so. I believe Jackie had him with Gianni Agnelli and that we have been lied to about his parentage.

  • hes a beautiful man

  • Thanks for this video record.

  • A father, a son; two unfulfilled potentials. They had so much to give this country and the world. We will never know what might have been, we can only morn their leaving much too soon and know their likes come along but very rarely.

  • Such a GREAT man; all he could have done for America, all that greatness snuffed out by hate. RIP JFK Jr., "this would was never meant for one as beautiful as you". You will never be forgotten.

  • I totally agree. Good looking man.

  • OMFG! He was HOOOOOOOOOT!

  • So? Hitler would have been on that list during WW2 ... being an important person during a time period has nothing to do with your morality (many of the most important people in history were ruthless tyrants).

  • You know you're a moron, right?!?

  • WOW.. Thanks JFK jr. ^_^

  • SpiderMcCain will post video exposing Gilbert Jesus for the bigot he is. Down with forcing religious beliefs on others.

  • What a disgusting lack of feeling.Get some class.

  • LOL I thought it was funny.

  • Support Obama for 2008! He supports "human rights," and Ted Kennedy and Caroline Kennedy are supporting Obama too! We have to stand together to get these religious fanatics OUT OF OUR WHITE HOUSE, and back into their churches! Vote Obama 2008!

  • (Assis) What is a spade?

  • John was charismatic, down to earth and smart. There is a theory that his death was not accidental, that he was killed by same dark powers that got his father and his uncle. His mother during her lifetime urged him to keep him out of the public eye. Within a year after her death he became a public figure with George Magazine, and four years later he was dead. A year after that we got the scion of a very different political dynasty as president.

  • ,,,,,so what's the theory? I thought he was late for take-off due to the wife's sister having to work normal hours ( Morgan Stanley), his leg in plaster , he was angry , and he was not qualified for night flying : not a promising combination??

  • There is multi-part video on YouTube, under the title:

    You CAN Handle The Truth - Who Killed JFK Jr ?

  • Thanks....but no thanks : watched the video but does not have much concrete evidence re-JFK Jnr demise. However,agree with many of the sentiments.

    Rgds

    HD

  • Oh GOD - There wasn't a gay in the world that didn't want to marry him. WHEW! WAS HE HOT!!!