Added: 2 years ago
From: Hansolo60
Views: 20,159
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (98)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • Maybe this shows....... Relatively speaking......

    A spinning non-metalic cylinder near a magnetic field induces an opposing field....therefore we get levitation.

    So......maybe a saucer type maybe spun up at a high rate of speed relative to the Earth and it magnetic field, and it levitate?

    Maybe we can also increase this field other ways too.

  • @byranmichelle That is exactly right. THe SEG superconducts, and the Voltage streaming off the rim is 1 TerraVolt. Current never exceeds 1.5 milliamps. The Earth REPELS the overloaded and superconducting SEG by its rim.

  • You will never ever see anything work from these SEG bunch of idiots.

    They are such pathetic liars

  • @abm3152 you sure?

  • @Hansolo60 In all honesty if you can build anything, ANYTHING, that works as a proof of concept... and if you bring it to any campus university... there a good chance that 1000-2000 dollars will turn into millions of dollars worth of grants, patents and royalties. All REAL scientists are insanely dedicated on working to improve the conditions and environments in which we live.

  • @BornAgainEngineer I'm working on lifters - the predecessor of moder UFOs.

  • So, all that is bullshit?

  • @Hansolo60 Absolute and utter bullshit.

  • Perendev magnet motor inventor arrested for embezzlement

    24 Apr 2010 ... Perendev magnet motor inventor arrested for embezzlement. After declaring bankruptcy in Germany, Mike Brady rented a house at Lake Zurich in ...

    pesn.com/.../9501640_Michael_J­_Brady_arrested_for_embezzleme­nt/ - Cached - Similar

  • Don't place the neodymium magnet above the roller, shove it up your ass, it will work better.

  • Fraud investigations on this SEG rubbish have begun,

    It seems that this hole SEG fraud has been going on for years and they expect it to continue for years to come...

    Well, Well, Well, we will see about that.

    I still think, if John Searl, (SEG), shoved a neodymium magnet up his ass, he might have had a better chance to making it work, "NARRRR"

    ( I can't stop laughing )..........

  • By the way guys they forget to tell you something in this video... Without that plastic shielding there behind the roller it would just fling thr roller off in that direction. This is nothing but a form of inductive levitation using lenz law. It is nothing new. It is not particularly impressive. And most of all it does not prove the machine is capable of producing the 1.5 gigawatts that Searl claims it can. which by the way is about $4,320,000 worth in electricity per day of operation.

  • Subspace4d, above, had it right. There is nothing new or extraordinary about this demonstration. The electromagnetic principles behind this effect have been well understood for 150 years. What is revolting is that some are pushing this as some sort of confirmation of Mr. Searl's fantasy physics. 

  • @stargate153 It is normal physics, not "fantasy physics". THis work will benefit YOU, directly in yor life, unless you enjoy paying $4 a galon for fuel, and remaining fettered to this planet.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Establishing eddy currents in a moving conductor that repel a magnet is conventional, 'normal' physics. Magnetic prime movers, a relation of magic number squares to the periodic table of the elements, teflon as a conductor, over-unity, 'free' electricity, inverse thermodynamics, inverse loading effects, inverse gravity,..These can be described as fantasy physics.

  • @stargate153 The SEG runs foplder and faster the more load is put on it, and it gets lighter in weight also concurrently with more load. At 4 Kelvin, the SEG loses all weight and inertia,. and the Earth REPELS it with great force.

  • @stargate153 The SEGF obeys the principles of ANENERGY. Or Vacuum energy, or ETHER.

  • Too bad the SEG's theory of operation isn't based on science or facts. It's based on an old man's dream and on his word it works, even though no one but him has ever seen it in operation.

  • @jib1000 The Law of the Squares were based on a repeating series of dreams that repeated twice a year when professor Searl was YOUNG, from age 4 to age 10, late 1930s to early 1940s.

  • @Beamshipcaptain So now we base our science on dreams? You aren't helping your position much.

    Also the "Law of Squares" isn't a scientific law, its just a way that numbered squares happen to work out. Its not science, its just a mathematical circumstance that humans find interesting.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Come now beamie... I know quite well why it is Searl claims to have gotten this information from dreams. He is fully aware that rational and intelligent people are not exactly his demographic for this scam. As such he tried to associate his "technology" as closely with UFO conspiracy theory as possible. The dream bit is supposed to tie in with the UFO enthusiast's beliefe that aliens communicate with people through thier subconsious. The saucer shape is supposed to reinforce it.

  • How is the force balanced for the magnet to stay at a certain position??

  • THis is no scam, if you would do the research, and talk to the people who were directly involved, and the millions of people in North America, Europe, and Australia and Russia who witnessed and participated in the work, you would know that. I have studied Professor Searl and his technology since 1986.

  • When I posted a textcomment the swebsite asked me to type in "farcevideo".

    This just isn't right.

  • WOW!

    The air current from the drum moves the air enough to pin the roller against the plastic brace!

    That's a lot of energy lost in air movement!

  • The magnet is not repelled by air, but paramagnetic force. This is demonstrating the phenomenon of EDDY CURRRENTS, in paramagnetic elements, like Copper, Bismuth, or Aluminium, central to the operation of the SEG, since 1946.

  • Why do the electrons flow from (+) to (-) in a circuit? I couldn't find a good answer. Pls, tell me.

  • Because an electron - proton attraction and repulsion is slightly unequal.

  • Can we say that electric current is something like a mexican wave?

  • @Beamshipcaptain It is quite clear that John Searl is a con man who prey's primarily on UFO conspiracy theorists. That and naive people who have had a poor education in physics and are a little too open minded for thier own good. Being open minded is not a bad thing but there comes a point where it stops being open mindedness and becomes out right absorbtion of what ever information is prsented to you first.

  • @MrAwsome514 The SEG and IGV flight control frames that I am responsible for obey all known laws of Physics. Theis work has been resurrected for YOUR and your children's benefit. Support Alternative, Cheap, Clean, energy.

  • @Beamshipcaptain YOu mean all of the laws of physics that you are aware of... Judging by the fact that no members of the Searl team actually hold any of the degrees that they claim to I would have to assume I will have to tell you what they are. The law of conservation of energy, the law of conservation of momentum, the law of conservation of mass, and almost every single law of thermodynamics. There are plenty more ofcourse but I don't want to crush your feeble mind under all those big words.

  • @MrAwsome514 THe law ob conservation of energy is obeyed. THe SEG converts the ambint energy that is the basis of vacuum. Every law of conservation of mass and mpomentum and thermodynamics is observed also.

  • @Beamshipcaptain You know just throwing the word vacuum into a scentance liek that does not make you right. You failed to describe what this "Vacuum" is. If you can't give a more detailed explaination of it than I can only assume this "Vacuum" is a meaningless word that you just throw in to the mix to distract idiots with. Unfortunately for you I am not an idiot.

  • @Beamshipcaptain Maybe if you bothered to go into detail about this vacuum you keep mentioning every time you get questioned it might be helpful to your argument. Frankly just throwing the word around makes you sound like you are misdirecting people's attention away from the fact that it really is just a word that you throw out as a defensive mechanisim when ever you get questioned that has no real meaning.

  • @Beamshipcaptain By the way I can't help but notice that you did not try to deny the fact that none of Searl's team have any real credentials.

  • @Hansolo60

    Electrons flow from +, which is an excess amount to -, which is a lower amount seeking balance.

  • @wtciiictw

    but they also travel from - to + because - is negative polarity.

  • Now back to the antigravity subject. You speak about paramagnetic and diamagnetic forces, but what about ferromagnetism? The toroidal propulsion uses Iron rods and copper wires and coils. It is kind of a mix of these magnetic elements with different magnetic properties. So, if Iron creates huge magnetic field when current flows in it, it's temperature increases proportionaly. It's the opposite of superconductivity. How do these saucers fly then?

  • @Hansolo60 they can fly because aliens have big dicks, dicks so big that they fit the ufo in their peewhole and begin ejaculating process. their big dicks then propel the craft to earth.

  • @Beamshipcaptain After the rolling magnets of the SEG have achieved true orbital status, and everything is running normally, how may electrical energy be drawn from the system without intefering with the motion of the rollers, unless Searl has discovered some method of defeating Lenze's law? I can see induced currents cascading from one layer to the next, but no path for any direct electrical currents though the device.

  • @scasired With pickup coils wound around C-shaped soft iron cores. When a magnetic field is moved past a conductor, a pulse of electicity is created, or EMF. The SEG also pushes electrons into the coils, resulting in COLD CURRRENT.

  • Comment removed

  • @Beamshipcaptain Even more evidence of this attempted association with UFO phenomina is the fact that Searl tried to link his alleged "test flight" with a UFO sighting in the town of westminster in 1965. Despite ofcourse the fact that every eye witness describes having seen a star shaped object which clearly could not have been the IVG. This story is intended to further reinfoce ties to UFO phenomina aswell as to compensate for searl's inability to provide video evidence of the flight.

  • @MrAwsome514 T was the IGV, the P-6. What they saw were the plasma field above and below the IGV due to pinching of the atmosphere by the fields.

  • ...at least this video goes some way towards substantiating what Searl is 'trying' to say....

  • nice to see some actual results for a change!

  • Professor Searl told me on Saturday the work is moving to the United States, and now it will go even faster! Peace. and fasten your seatbelt!

  • lol nice to see he is still around !!

  • By the grace of God... Thankfully!

  • @Beamshipcaptain Fantastic.

  • I see nothing altered in this video. This is just one of the known efects in physics that the SEG takes advantage of, to be frictionless, and run COLD, instead of hot.

  • and very fast !

  • flowerbower, generally accepted are many things in physics, ordinary people simply do not understand. Correct is however, we have near more physical theories then theoretical physicists. All theories remain hypotheses, unless they are not validated by experiments and observations. If you wanted to force crackpot-believers into the corner, I'd suggest, you asked them for an accessible, verifyable, repeatable and unambigous proof for the claims they advocate. It helps much.

    ;-))

  • flowerbower, that's not exactly correct. You can create a ZPE-sink area between two Casimir-plates. Then you have a potential difference, where cyclic work can be extracted. (2LTD). The bad news however is, the extractable amount of ZPE is on a nW/m^3-scale. Not much more than harvesting energy from MBR.

    'Electrogravitics' is utter nonsense indeed. There is *NO* coupling between EM and G in all odd spacetimes (n=2m-1=1,3,5,7,..). You need to go into n=2m, where two e- share gravitons.

    ;-))

  • In what way was Piggot an "incompetent Experimentalist"? Nipher and Saxyl were contemporaries of Einstein, and Eistein and Laub had already done moving capacitor expriments by 1908, and suggested a magnetically permeable dielectric to increase the effect and presented the theoretical work predicting the resulting EM fields. Relates to Hopper's work with Motional Electric Fields. Your powers of judgment are subjective, and faulty, as usual. Crazy person. flowergirl.

  • No. Not a scientologist. I am a man of reason, not faith. The age old struggle. Even Michael Faraday wrote on the coupling between Electricity and Gravitation. George S. Piggotss,enhanced Wimshurst under several atmospheres of pressure, starting in 1903, produced startling gravity-control experiments over a century ago, whilst Relativity was being tweaked by Einstein.

  • It has been accepted by Casimir, and the Late Dr. Robert Forward, whom I met in 1990, built a battery that extracts electrical energy from ZPE. Cold Fusion as well as Ken Shoulders Charge clusters in rotation papers and patents. Extraction of the staggering energy density and potential of ZPE orthorotated from hyperspace has been cutting-edge in science for over 50-years.

  • Eddy-crrents between the plate and runners float the runners as they orbit and spin about the plates with no physical contact. Just as it has since the first SEG in 1946.

  • Can you explain me how the downhill effect is being created? So far I know if there is vacuum infront of the vehicle sucks itin, and this is what makes the IGV fly in atmosphere. But in space it should somehow lower the space density to a minus factor since we know that it is 0. Correct? A downhill.

  • It is not the vacuum that makes it fly. Dont forget, the IGV is very heavy, the ten-footer, the P-11, weighed 4.5 TONS. The IGV flies by the KONTRABARIC EFFEKT, and the dynamic-counterbary produced by the IGV being repelled by the Earth-s gravity-field with great force; remember at flight-Voltage of some 10^12 Volts(current never exceeds 1.5 milliAmps), the superconducting SEG loses all inertia, develops a 1/2-G onboard gravity, and then NOTHING can hold it down. 2-like fields in Nature REPEL.

  • Kontrabaric should mean low pressure I guess?

  • Barycentric control, or dynamic counterbary means ANTIGRAVITY, or ARTIFICIAL GRAVITY. BARIC prefix or suffix has to do with rise or fall to the Earth's surface. A hot air or Helium Balloon is an antigravity device (the sun's gravity is shuch that Hydrogen has weight, and can't escape the Sun's gravity. We substitute ELECTRICAL CHARGE, or SEPARATION OF ELECTROSTATIC CHARGE for hydrogen and helium, in electrogravity devices, and we can vector the force in ANY direction, not just UP, thru POLARITY.

  • IGV in flight has negative mass, hasn't it?

  • No. NO! IGV at flight-Voltage (some 10^12,10^13 Volts, current never exceeds 1.5 MilliAmperes) has NO INERTIAL MASS. ZERO.

  • What about gravitational mass? We know it is equal to the inertial. Again zero?

  • No. Gravitational-mass stays the same. Gravitational mass and inertial mass are separate entities.

  • Then why do world leading scientists always say that if are going to have FTL drive, we have to master the negative mass (a.k.a. "exotic matter") propulsion? They say that once we've got it, the crew of a starship won't feel any acceleration at all, because inertia will be negative as well.

  • Because this work is not in our textbooks, even though it is in science-journals lik NATURE, and PHYSICAL REVIEW. Universities do'nt yet offer degree-study programs in electrogravitics, and zero-point energy, so noone specialises in it, except some few, like Paul LaViolette, Ted Loder, Takaaki Musha, etc. Gravitation and electricity are one and the SAME THING. Magnetism requires CURRENT, MOVING CHARGE. Gravitation is high energy ELECTROSTATCS(no currrent-flow).The unifying field is the ELECTRIC.

  • In other words, they have'nt a clue 95% of the time. But they and we can LEARN. And examine and replicate past successfull work. Such as theat of Tesla, Piggott, Saxyl, Nieper, Einstein, Brown, Bahnson, King, Hubbard, Keely, Seiki, Sweet,Carr, Podkletnov, and of course my boss, mentor, teammate and dear friend, Professor John Searl.

  • Yes, you are right.

    P.S. What's the current status of the model?

  • The IGV is being rebuilt, after not being satisfied with how it was going. This time I am building it like the earlier smaller 1-meter diameter model IGV I built 15-years ago.

  • Please, explain to me here one more time about the time rate inside the saucers. I listened one more time Bob Lazar explanations when he said that the Sport Model decreases the distance and also the time, making space-time between two points smaller. Inside an implified gravitational field time runs slower than outside as well - time dilation. Stan Deyo on the other hand said something different: the sucers operate at higher neural rate and the crews inside life 5-10 times faster than outside ??

  • And one more thing - time inside an IGV runs at the same rate as that of an outside observer. But you do not amplifi the wave as far as I know, so no time dilation observation... Yet the part of Stan Deyo's explanation is what makes me wonder about that difference between the Sport Model, the Toroidal saucers, and the IGVs. Why do time accelerate inside Deyo's crafts????

  • Actually, time runs slightly faster inside an SEG, overloaded, superconducting and at flight-Voltage; the SEG produces only 1/2 G onboard gravity, so time runs slightly faster inside the energised craft.

  • And how can we use that for practical interstellar travel?

  • Because it lacks inertia, and its source of energy is the zero-point energy embedded in vacuum and matter, it is our first Alcubierre warp drive. G-well in front, G-hill in rear. Space contracts in front of the disc, and expands in back of the disc. Wa more than enough energy available for the warp-drive inteerstellar travel effect, by using the overloaded, superconducting SEG as your powerplant and drive, in zero-point energy devices and systems, the two always go together.

  • But when space contracts in front and expands back of the IGV, it neutraizes the time dilation factor. It may move fast, faster than light, but we inside, for example, will still feel the time duration of the trip. From that point of view The Sport Model is far better than the Warp Drive of Star Trek, or... IGV of Professor John Searl. Don't understant me wrong, I want to ride on both vehicles :)

    P.S. How did they set up a base on Zeta R.? With vehicles like IGV and the Toroids, right?

  • Yes, good, that is right, that is WARP DRIVE, it neutralizes mass-dialation which builds up normally with increasing inertia, increasing inertial mass (which is dangerous for living-mater, and the structure of a ship). But with the SEG, or TT Brown drives, there is NO inertial mass whatsoever, it is dampened, cancelled, as every atom of ship and payload respnds in uiform fashion to the applied artificial-gravity field.

  • Is it easier to build up a toroidal electrogravitic craft than an IGV? And also it cheaper?

  • Yes, it is easier, and cheaper. Beware the high-magnetic-flux, which is not healthy for humans and animals. Read works and look at videos of Toroidal antigravity devices from Stan Deyo (THE COSMIC CONSPIRACY).

  • I'll do it, but before that - why did the government chose the toroidal propulsion rather than the Searl Effect, which is healthier?

  • About the performance - can a toroidal gravitic craft be faster than a Searl Effect craft and do more work?

  • The front quadrand of the rim and flame-barrier is charged positively, whilst the rest of the disc is negatively charged. SUBQUANTUM KINETICS. Read the book by Paul A LaViolette.

  • In the book: "Antigravity - The Dream Made Reality" - the Professor says that IGV FEEDS on gravity of other planets and they are it's guiding system. NOW the BIG question is: can the IGV fly upwards and downwards of the Galactic flatness since the star systems end after ~10 000ly? I mean - could it go intergalactic?

  • Yes. The Biefeld Brown effect, coutesy of the 64-flight-cells, operate independent of any gravity field. The professor means the the IGV is REPELLED by the gravity fields of the sun and any planetary-mass. Any mass less than the mass of the SEG and IGV is repelled from the RIM of the craft. SUBQUANTUM KINETICS: Positive-space charge is a G-well, an ATTRACTION. Negative space charge is a G-hill, a REPULSION. Read: SUBQUANTUM KINETICS, and SECRETS OF ANTIGRAVITY PROPULSION, by LaViolette!

  • In Antigravity - The Dream Made Reality, there is an excerpt from a report by Gunnar Sandberg. In the report, albeit not in that particular excerpt, Sandberg describes in a fair amount of detail what process to use for magnetizing. Could one presume that following this process will actually yield a magnet like Searl's, with many poles around its perimeter, or is that information presented merely as a related curiosity?

  • No, that is the DC with superimposed AC magnetising process, that is toatally unlike normal magnets. That is one of the keys to the Searl Effect, dictated from DREAM ONE (Law of the Squares matrices).

  • Er... I had actually asked an either-or type question... so "no", the sandberg report doesn't yield a magnet like Searl's, or "no", the information is not merely presented as a related curiosity? Your answer seems to imply that the latter, which is that utilizing the process that Sandberg outlines would actually yield magnets with the special waveform that Searl's magnets have. Thank you so much for replying.

  • That is the magnetic coil that Fernando Morris uses to recreate the wagon-wheel spokes of magnetism that radiate from each plate and runner. DC, with ONE complete turn of AC wound on top. What you end up with are helical-cut GEARS, made out of magnetic-fields, instead of solid-material.

  • Is a toroidal winding required, or are all windings solenoidal?

  • Solenoidal. Toroidal would make little sense.

  • Okay, thanks. I thought as much, although I wanted to be sure, because a picture I've seen seems to shows 3 coils, not just 2... an AC coil, a DC coil, and a third coil called a phasing torus coil... I thought perhaps the AC might have been connected to that.

  • Look at the photos of the new magnetising coil, completed in Autumn 2008, and it passed all tests, with colors flying. All being shipped to America as we speak.

  • We are reaching new goals. Thanks to our boss and mentor, Professor John RR Searl, and Chief SEF-engineer Fernando Morris, whom I met in 2006 at COFE II (COFE III is coming in october,2009), the work of MANKIND is getting done. I look forward to the final-assembly and testing of the three-ring, level-four-square, rare-earth-cored SEG prototype for century-21. Long live Professor Searl, the greatest human-being since Nikola Tesla!

  • This is just eddy current that let magnet hover above fast moving metallic surfaces. It is nothing new. The effect is called lenz law. I will support this effect in my videos. Thank you for posting :o)

  • God bless Professor Searl and the new Searl Team. Now that I have done my lecture on Electrogravitics last weekend at Nikola Telsa Free Energy days here in Philadelphia, I can concentrate on finishing the 3-meter Searl IGV in time for COFE III in October. Tom Valone also gave a lecture at Tesla days last weekend.

  • Wow , I get it.... how long has this been posssible.???

  • Since 1946, when the first SEG was built in the UK.

  • @williamwagener Uh, since the universe had cooled enough to form solid phase matter?

  • @williamwagener Hmm. Well today is thursday so... allways. This is nothing more than a highschool physics experiment that has been repurposed into an advertisment for their scam.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more