My 99 durango 5.2L V8 does 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, sometimes faster. Something is about to blow on that motor because i've seen faster turtles than that.
I mean 12 seconds is just absolutely pathetic; my '96 Honda Civic LX with 100 HP can do better than that! I swear Dodge makes the worst fucking cars in the world. My dad's 2002 Caravan 2.4L with 150 HP does 0-60 in like 11 seconds. I mean how the hell is the company not learning from it's mistakes? Unbelievable.
i got a 1999 dodge durango SLT with the 5.2L 318 v8 and its much fast then this i did like 7 seconds in 0 to 60 something is realy off with yours what are you towing someones house or something lol
I have a 2000 Dodge stratus Se, lil 4 banger and no mods done to it and it would beat you considering it does 0-60 in around 11 seconds if you say it was fully loaded with people then there might be some performance problems I have a 98 Durango SLT and no mods and that thing gets up and hauls ass in my opinion with a full load, But im not bagging on your truck or anything and it sucks that yours got totaled I hope you find another like it there the best you can ever buy Hope to hear from you.
i aggree with Doctaphil64 i got a 2000 durango sport 4.7 and it would kill this thing this car is runing way to slow for a 360 ,i mite think it was a v6 if it wasn't for the sound
Wow dumbass first off I wasn't the one driving, and this car was totaled a year ago so yeah there's something wrong with it. Oh and third, learn some grammar and spelling skills.
this is for DKELLY61 - i knoe they are not made for speed, they are made for poorer people who cant even afford a toyota. And they are fucking unsafe so the person who bought it must be a massive douchebag and doesnt even have a simple understanding of how unsafe this plastic car is. and for around the same price you could have probably bought a better car. look at the speedometer, i could have made a better one. and WOW is has a massive towing capcity that is truly amazing...
Lol epic fail, check out the crash test ratings of that time, Durango's are VERY safe, when this exact one was totaled in a crash, nobody was hurt. And as far as 'plastic' goes, ANY newer car have plastic components and Toyota are well known for making cars made almost entirely of it. You're going to have to come up with something better.
LMAO yota SUV's and trucks are POS you are an idiot. my dura will dominate any yota you put next to it or behind it. they are a sorry excuse for SUV's and trucks. and they are made of TONS of plastic!! you are an idiot. the 5.9 magnum would rape them too
you're an ignorant douche if you seriously think that. The durango's MSRP was twice that of a honda civic at one point, and besides that, my 4.7 litre might get half the plastic cars gas mileage, but weighs 4 times as much, is just as fast (faster with $50 in mods...lol.) and fits twice as many people. So yeah..I choose my badass, sexy pitch-black durango over your "expensive, good" car. Oh and the Durango's payload on the 5.9 is 6,700 LBS. Or 4 of your honda Civics.
i dont know what you mean bout expensive car honda civics are like 18,500 dollars my durango brand new the slt plus 2002 cost 35,000 dollars basically double that of a honda civic...my used durango is like 12k STILL with 71k miles civics suck get in a crash at 10+ miles and your as good as dead plus you CAN'T go wrong with a V8 dude, just not possible...
My '00 R/T with upgraded ignition system, K&N FIPK, superchips 91 performance setting, 52mm TB ran 0-62mph (100km/h) in 6.9 seconds with minimal wheelspin at launch. If I launced properly and dropped the transmission into gear at 2500rpm I could have probably squeezed out a 6.7-6.8sec time at the track.
wow apappaz your dad must be the coolest person ever with a mercedes. durangos are not made for speed, they can fit a shit load of people and tow a decent amount of weight. that is like comparing a hummer and a corvetta and saying the corvette is faster
for an suv thats from early 2000's and the 90's they are pretty quick man and r/t stands for r/t and most civics and shit have to be modified to get good power and speed you put 2-3 hundred bucks in a durango and it'll eat hondas and shit toyotas, nuff said...
bone stock my moms durango goes 0-60 in 9 seconds 8.7 according to dodge then again its 250hp and 320ft lbs torque top speed (according to gps)117mph only upgrade ams air filter and econemy exost system aka high restriction exost (bad for preformance)
Ya I'm wondering if maybe the faulty o2 sensor had something to do with it, it might have been causing the computer to fuck with the air mixture or something.
You can definitely tell it has to do with the 'Check Engine' light being on. My mom's Durango has the same engine and it can do 0-60 pretty quick (don't know the exact figure, but it's quicker than my car which is 8.0 seconds)
I have a few mods as well to my 2K R/T. Including superchips 91 performance setting, K&N intake, Taylor wires with MSD6A unit and a 52mm TB. The engine takes in more air than it can get rid of so an exhaust is in order. My last AWD dyno resulted in 268hp@4400rpm at all wheels. Stock, it barely touched 210hp@4000rpm. My latest track test netted me 0-60 in 7.4 seconds with a full load of fuel. Stock R/T is rated at 8.1sec 0-60. So it's a good improvement and low end picked up a lot around town!
The car wasn't running right at the time of this video, if it was tuned up I doubt your 1.2 would beat it, assuming this car hadn't just been involved in a crash and been totaled lol
hey guys, i have a 99 5.2 durango with 99000 miles, but a 2002 durango r/t caught my attention but its salvage, do you think i should buy it and get rid of the one i have?
i dont know the r/t isnt bad there nice the 5.9 is a good motor, but still all the transmissions suck ass! i would keep what u got and take it easy on the trans
Just to let everybody know, the Durango met a tragic demise a few weeks ago when my friend's dad drove off the road and crashed. Nobody was hurt except for the car which was totaled.
Different year!!! They do change redlines in different years! I have a 97 f150 that (before mods) redlines at 4500 rpm and the 99 redlines at 4900 (both 5.4l)
theres no way thats the 5.9 no mother fuckin way. i have the 5.2 (318) in my 2000 durango. and its completely stock and i would run all over your ass!!!
I am waiting for the TRD supercharger to come out so I can install it along with intake and exhaust so I can rip from 0-60 in the 4 second range. It is pretty amazing stock though at 6.1 seconds
@bgoins12 Weight no doubt... maybe the transmission limits the speed a bit as well. The 4.7 in a 99 Jeep grand cherokee is much slower than the 5.9 98 grand cherokee. Does the durango use a 46RE transmission as well?
no masareti... u got it all wrong. the only american made car that will break down after an hour of driving is a FORD cuz they suck... but i do agree with fordgtfanatic; a duramax or cummins (preferably) diesel will kick any foreign made cars ass
LOL! Range Rover is now the least reliable SUV availible in America according to JD powers. The top 5 most reliable car brands are as follows: Lexus, Buick, Lincoln, Mercury and Honda. Nowhere in there is any Euro car brand mentioned.
I have an 03 SXT with a 4.7 and flowmasters with comp upgrade and kill 5.9l all day. 0-60 by G-tech Pro...7.18 sec. Love the sound of the big 8's though.
mistade u a fag using trucks to race is a wast of money yea its womens driver witch couldn't shift but wow 9.3 for 0-60 is really going to be fast a scion tc would smash on its ass all day
First of all, ur an idiot. What do you mean the woman driver couldnt shift? It was an auto. And second of all, scions are a giant POS. Go ride ur ricer elsewere
ok first of all i think we got started off wrong again oh wat is ur name again dip shit but yea it was auto and yea 9.3 ok wat ever this durango had sumthin messed up but wat ever you have fun with the scion tc man i have no problem with them but seriously they are a PIECE OF SHIT seriously they look like shit and i would sriously like to race you someday and beat ur ass with my durango or dakota.
This is actually my families car and it was from a long time ago, and yes the car sucks with speed, I know. But it was supposed to show how bad my car is... and yes any other car could beat it even another durango. just lettin u know that since u were pissed off.
ok so fuck off and trucks for racing lets see is fun and aint a waste of money b/c it takes less to make my durango kick ur tc's ass then u putting a shit load into it to make it catch up with me ok have a fine day and now i think u missed ur daily beating of ur meat to ur boyfriend. good day and i hope you write back cause this is fun. thanks i think you left a comment here FAG!
fuck yall the dodge durango kicks ass you dont even have to have a 5.9 a 5.2 does pretty damn well also we turned out over 400 horses in our 5.2 and hell we kicked ass and im tired of these people that are hating on dodge fuck all you haters. also they dont know how to drive so yea and it sounds like its a girl driving it. have a nice day
Let's all get defensive, why don't we? I drive a fullsize van with the 5.2, weighs 5300 pounds, 0-60 of 11 seconds. I'm currently converting it to high-flow (dynomax super turbo, magnaflow catcon). Let's see what difference that may make (Mine also slows way the hell down at 50mph)
Every car company has lemons, I know someone who bought a brand new Honda and it has had nothing but problems since brand new. ur friend just had bad luck.
Well this video was taken a year ago and his Durango still runs like a champ (besides the lack of power) I the the Check Engine light was because of an o2 sensor.
What year.. I had a 99 I went form fuse in the engine to alternator to other fuse in the tranny to blown heads to more fuses.. Then the trany start to ship 2nd and 3rd gear "which I think is your unpowered part". Then after a whole year of the truck running for two days at a time in a week I trade the bitch in.. I'm a pround Ford owner..
the reason you had problems with yours is because you didnt take care of it . if you take care of a dodge they will last forever. dodge has the longest lasting american desel pickup. if your really easy on it it will go for 400,000 miles. if you have a little fun evry once in a while youll get 350,000 out of it before problems start setting in.
NO! "Bitch" semi's go for longer than that the cummins does go for that long you are full of shit. these hings are my life. i read everything that has to do with them i know what im talking about. i guess you've got really bad luck,and ford has spent $3,000,000 on gay pride organization. even when their on the edge of going bankrupt. they must really know how it feels to be gay. YOUR FULL OF SHIT , YOU DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKIN ABOUT, 850K ON A GASSER YOUR FULL OF SHIT!
OO may.. Frist water pumb when out.. Under warranty cost out of my pocket 500 bucks.. O found out the engine was linking other 250 to fix it.. Still under warranty miles 32K.. At 34K fuse keeps going out every 2 day or so.. Form alternator fuses to the fucking alternator.. Then a fuse goes out of the trany.. Cost 100 per fuse.. Still under warranty.. Over cost on that.. 500+ dallors..
After getting the truck looked at a 5 star dodge Reno.. 10 miles down the road trany started to jump.. Took to dodge they said it was fine.. Took to a shop they said the trany was gone..
Took it back to dodge.. Dodge did notting still under warranty.. Keep the bitch for other 4 months fix it every day.. Still under warranty..
yeah your right dodge sucks because the jeep cherokee i had lasted about 100 miles before tranny blew out so ya daimler chrysler vehicles suck ass. someone i know has a cherrokee and its a pieco of shit 2 transmissions blown out so he trades in for explorer or expedition or somethin.
Something's definitely not right with that Durango doing 0-60 around 12 seconds. Definitely not making the power. Stock 0-60 would be much quicker, especially with the tow package.
i own 2001 245hp SLT V8, the official times is 9.1s 0-60. but i changed that, i did 2 little modifications that bumped my car to 295hp and 385 lb/tq. now its in the sports sedan range.
You have the 5.9 too? im not sure what you did, because i cant think of any two small mods that can bump you that high. Especially when your 5.9 is only getting about 200hp and 280tq to the wheels.
fyi- I have a 5.2 durango /w intake, ported tb, headers, exhaust, plugs/wires, superchips, and a 180tstat and i know i didnt gain 50hp from that. my 5.2 got stock about 190hp and 270tq to the wheels, im guessing that i have around 220hp and roughly 300tq to the wheels after all that. so, if you really did do two small mods id love to know so i can do them two, but honestly i dont see how thats possible. sorry kid.
seriously do u guys think this car can beat a 1997 ford explorer sport, i have a friend who wants to race but i wasnt sure, i got mine to go 0-60 in 7.3, but he claims his durango can go 0-60 in 6.3 seconds, he has a stock 5.9L, what do u guys think?
If your Explorer can do 0-60 in 7.3, and their Durango is completely stock then there is no way it would beat you. I'm pretty sure the official 0-60 time for the D with the 5.9 liter is 8.5 so I'd say you would probably win that race.
Iv got the 5.9 R/T and my buds got the 2001 Expo n we actully met off the highway racing haha the Durango takes over the Explorer. its been done 2wice.good luck
You definantely have something wrong with it. My '03 with the 4.7 pulls a 8.5 sec 0-60. Did you reroute your plug wires and only use copper core champion plugs? Otherwise, you may be getting excessive pinging, its common on the 5.2 and 5.9 powered durangos.
Did that say, Check engine....??? Maybe thats why it took so long!
funkeyman606 8 months ago
Ive a durango 99 5.2L V8 does 0-60 in 6.5 seconds flat
malesro 10 months ago
I think it was a fine video. Nice car by the way!
10110101101011 11 months ago
obviously not pressing on the gas all the way.
BlackAstonMartin 1 year ago
@BlackAstonMartin: Notice that it shifted at redline? It was floored
stanbernadino 1 year ago
@stanbernadino just because it shifts at redline doesnt mean that its floored all the way. you can progressively floor it to redline.
BlackAstonMartin 1 year ago
My 99 durango 5.2L V8 does 0-60 in 7 seconds flat, sometimes faster. Something is about to blow on that motor because i've seen faster turtles than that.
ogbruticus 1 year ago
i got a 99 durango SLT 4x4 with the 5.2L and 0 to 60 is like high 6s or low 7s so i dont know whats going on with yours
grizzleybearz282004 1 year ago
I mean 12 seconds is just absolutely pathetic; my '96 Honda Civic LX with 100 HP can do better than that! I swear Dodge makes the worst fucking cars in the world. My dad's 2002 Caravan 2.4L with 150 HP does 0-60 in like 11 seconds. I mean how the hell is the company not learning from it's mistakes? Unbelievable.
Dezso3 1 year ago
@Dezso3
What an ignorant remark.
nrmntrs1 1 year ago
my 99 dodge durango 5.2L 318 v8 did 0 to 60 a hair under 7 seconds
grizzleybearz282004 1 year ago
i got a 1999 dodge durango SLT with the 5.2L 318 v8 and its much fast then this i did like 7 seconds in 0 to 60 something is realy off with yours what are you towing someones house or something lol
grizzleybearz282004 1 year ago
I have a 2000 Dodge stratus Se, lil 4 banger and no mods done to it and it would beat you considering it does 0-60 in around 11 seconds if you say it was fully loaded with people then there might be some performance problems I have a 98 Durango SLT and no mods and that thing gets up and hauls ass in my opinion with a full load, But im not bagging on your truck or anything and it sucks that yours got totaled I hope you find another like it there the best you can ever buy Hope to hear from you.
EC0GI00FD0DA0AII0 1 year ago
I know this video is 4 years old but... You probably needed new 02 sensors or a mAF sensor
clarda1 1 year ago
i aggree with Doctaphil64 i got a 2000 durango sport 4.7 and it would kill this thing this car is runing way to slow for a 360 ,i mite think it was a v6 if it wasn't for the sound
coltonwithano 1 year ago 5
There were 6 people in the truck when I filmed this, that's a big reason this run was so slow.
stanbernadino 1 year ago
thats sad i got the 4.7 and i went 0 to 60 in bout 7.5 lol
fordboy111591 2 years ago 2
Wow dumbass 1st off u need to run it threw the gears yourself and second theres something wrong with ur car
pwn3dairy 2 years ago
Wow dumbass first off I wasn't the one driving, and this car was totaled a year ago so yeah there's something wrong with it. Oh and third, learn some grammar and spelling skills.
stanbernadino 2 years ago 7
12 seconds? Uh, no. Its supposed to be something like 8 seconds, yours is slow.
jriley1992 2 years ago
there was something VERY wrong with that
SketchyPete35 2 years ago 6
i got a 2001 r/t that can do 0-100 in 9.4 sec
The2010camaro 2 years ago
I actually just timed this ony my phone and your 0-60 was 14.95
unowhtidc4554 2 years ago
I timed it on my phone too, and you're right, it's even worse than I thought =\.
stanbernadino 2 years ago
this is for DKELLY61 - i knoe they are not made for speed, they are made for poorer people who cant even afford a toyota. And they are fucking unsafe so the person who bought it must be a massive douchebag and doesnt even have a simple understanding of how unsafe this plastic car is. and for around the same price you could have probably bought a better car. look at the speedometer, i could have made a better one. and WOW is has a massive towing capcity that is truly amazing...
apappaz 2 years ago
Lol epic fail, check out the crash test ratings of that time, Durango's are VERY safe, when this exact one was totaled in a crash, nobody was hurt. And as far as 'plastic' goes, ANY newer car have plastic components and Toyota are well known for making cars made almost entirely of it. You're going to have to come up with something better.
stanbernadino 2 years ago
LMAO yota SUV's and trucks are POS you are an idiot. my dura will dominate any yota you put next to it or behind it. they are a sorry excuse for SUV's and trucks. and they are made of TONS of plastic!! you are an idiot. the 5.9 magnum would rape them too
STLATF 2 years ago 2
@ appapawhatever....
you're an ignorant douche if you seriously think that. The durango's MSRP was twice that of a honda civic at one point, and besides that, my 4.7 litre might get half the plastic cars gas mileage, but weighs 4 times as much, is just as fast (faster with $50 in mods...lol.) and fits twice as many people. So yeah..I choose my badass, sexy pitch-black durango over your "expensive, good" car. Oh and the Durango's payload on the 5.9 is 6,700 LBS. Or 4 of your honda Civics.
Doctaphil64 2 years ago 2
i dont know what you mean bout expensive car honda civics are like 18,500 dollars my durango brand new the slt plus 2002 cost 35,000 dollars basically double that of a honda civic...my used durango is like 12k STILL with 71k miles civics suck get in a crash at 10+ miles and your as good as dead plus you CAN'T go wrong with a V8 dude, just not possible...
aaminjoshi91 2 years ago
My '00 R/T with upgraded ignition system, K&N FIPK, superchips 91 performance setting, 52mm TB ran 0-62mph (100km/h) in 6.9 seconds with minimal wheelspin at launch. If I launced properly and dropped the transmission into gear at 2500rpm I could have probably squeezed out a 6.7-6.8sec time at the track.
RT360ci 2 years ago
wat a slow piece shit my dad's mercedes a class is faster than that shit box.
apappaz 2 years ago
Mercedes are overpriced status-symbols, and the A class is uglier than a Prius. It also can't haul 8 people or go off road.
stanbernadino 2 years ago
I agree. A class is in a class all it's own, with the Mini Cooper, which for 1/4 less money will blow its doors off.
RT360ci 2 years ago
@RT360ci Yay for Mini's I has one. =D
tomcatdcn 2 years ago
wow apappaz your dad must be the coolest person ever with a mercedes. durangos are not made for speed, they can fit a shit load of people and tow a decent amount of weight. that is like comparing a hummer and a corvetta and saying the corvette is faster
dkelly61 2 years ago 5
for an suv thats from early 2000's and the 90's they are pretty quick man and r/t stands for r/t and most civics and shit have to be modified to get good power and speed you put 2-3 hundred bucks in a durango and it'll eat hondas and shit toyotas, nuff said...
aaminjoshi91 2 years ago
@apappaz Exactly. Your daddy's Mercedes.
tomcatdcn 2 years ago
Add a ProCharger onto a 5.9 Durango with some other mods, and it'll outperform all but the most expensive AMG models, at 1/4 the price!
RT360ci 2 years ago 2
The sad thing is that thats how fast they really are. I'm sure some redneck is going to call me a ricer and say his durango runs 11's
fuckford7272 3 years ago
nah, most of them are much faster, around 8.5 to 60 this one just needed a tuneup.
stanbernadino 3 years ago
Alrighty go ahead and try this again but trun o/d off the durango gets up and shifts smother when you floor it.
bluefox 3 years ago
man i dont know what to tell you look at mine on my name it does alot better its pretty stock just intake but leave me a comment if ya want
98durangopack 3 years ago
i think there towing something thats what mine sounds like when i gun it with the fourwheller on the trailer
98durangopack 3 years ago
its an SUV give it a break and lady buy a stop watch.
Theautotech 3 years ago
bone stock my moms durango goes 0-60 in 9 seconds 8.7 according to dodge then again its 250hp and 320ft lbs torque top speed (according to gps)117mph only upgrade ams air filter and econemy exost system aka high restriction exost (bad for preformance)
Theautotech 3 years ago
yea 12 seconds isnt normal for any durango.. my buddy has a 2000 with a 360.. and it goes a hell of a lot faster than 12 seconds...
izzyvendetta 3 years ago
Ya I'm wondering if maybe the faulty o2 sensor had something to do with it, it might have been causing the computer to fuck with the air mixture or something.
stanbernadino 3 years ago
i kinda doubt it... like if anything youll just get shittier mileage with a faulty o2 sensor... but on a good day you get like 13mpg... haha...
izzyvendetta 3 years ago
I have an 03 and it gets to 60 in a lot quicker than 12 sec.
voicebreaker1 3 years ago
You can definitely tell it has to do with the 'Check Engine' light being on. My mom's Durango has the same engine and it can do 0-60 pretty quick (don't know the exact figure, but it's quicker than my car which is 8.0 seconds)
KatsukiLennox 3 years ago
Just bought me the '02 4x2 with the 4.7....Check out my vids i got a 0-60 in 7.4 on one of the new ones.
94EglVisionTSI 3 years ago
I have a few mods as well to my 2K R/T. Including superchips 91 performance setting, K&N intake, Taylor wires with MSD6A unit and a 52mm TB. The engine takes in more air than it can get rid of so an exhaust is in order. My last AWD dyno resulted in 268hp@4400rpm at all wheels. Stock, it barely touched 210hp@4000rpm. My latest track test netted me 0-60 in 7.4 seconds with a full load of fuel. Stock R/T is rated at 8.1sec 0-60. So it's a good improvement and low end picked up a lot around town!
RT360ci 3 years ago
lool. my 1.2 liter is faster
abominableaussieman 3 years ago
The car wasn't running right at the time of this video, if it was tuned up I doubt your 1.2 would beat it, assuming this car hadn't just been involved in a crash and been totaled lol
stanbernadino 3 years ago
probably right, but it is a 1.2 rotary rx7 and it only wieghts 1000kg so you never know! lol
abominableaussieman 3 years ago
Ya dude that little rx7 isn't too bad I haven't seen one in a hella long time, those wankle engines put out a lot of power for their displacement.
stanbernadino 3 years ago
yeah, they make good power. Its all about power to weight as well, well it helps anyway.
abominableaussieman 3 years ago
damn thats slow as shit...the R/t's with the 360 are rated at 0-60=8.3 s
94EglVisionTSI 3 years ago
hey guys, i have a 99 5.2 durango with 99000 miles, but a 2002 durango r/t caught my attention but its salvage, do you think i should buy it and get rid of the one i have?
rica810 3 years ago
i dont know the r/t isnt bad there nice the 5.9 is a good motor, but still all the transmissions suck ass! i would keep what u got and take it easy on the trans
nashowns 3 years ago
Just to let everybody know, the Durango met a tragic demise a few weeks ago when my friend's dad drove off the road and crashed. Nobody was hurt except for the car which was totaled.
stanbernadino 3 years ago
4700 redline means it's the 5.2L engine dude.
goldenjimbo007 4 years ago
sorry but i have one with the 5.2 and they redline at 5200
nashowns 4 years ago
Different year!!! They do change redlines in different years! I have a 97 f150 that (before mods) redlines at 4500 rpm and the 99 redlines at 4900 (both 5.4l)
damanwitoutaname 4 years ago
you fuckin made 15 second's pendejo.. shit my jeep its only 4.7 and make's only 9 seconds from 0 to 60!!!! thats fucking speed dumb ass!!
wellsfargojoto 4 years ago
whoa there don't get your panties in a bunch!
It aint even my car
stanbernadino 4 years ago
u sound like a girl
benanddavidproduct 4 years ago
LOL that's my friend David talking I don't say anything till the end
stanbernadino 4 years ago
theres no way thats the 5.9 no mother fuckin way. i have the 5.2 (318) in my 2000 durango. and its completely stock and i would run all over your ass!!!
nashowns 4 years ago
I am waiting for the TRD supercharger to come out so I can install it along with intake and exhaust so I can rip from 0-60 in the 4 second range. It is pretty amazing stock though at 6.1 seconds
sevenedges 4 years ago
lol that had to be a 4.7
lolipopshhh 4 years ago
nope, it's the 5.9
stanbernadino 4 years ago
4.7 has been proven to be quicker than the 5.9, stock for stock.
bgoins12 1 year ago
@bgoins12 Weight no doubt... maybe the transmission limits the speed a bit as well. The 4.7 in a 99 Jeep grand cherokee is much slower than the 5.9 98 grand cherokee. Does the durango use a 46RE transmission as well?
killbotexe 1 year ago
no masareti... u got it all wrong. the only american made car that will break down after an hour of driving is a FORD cuz they suck... but i do agree with fordgtfanatic; a duramax or cummins (preferably) diesel will kick any foreign made cars ass
okura09 4 years ago
i do 6 seconds on my h22a Accord
yosoydjchris 4 years ago
check engine light could be making it slow and prob needs a tune up , 5.9 liter haul ass
amermuscle 4 years ago
you must have the 5.9L the 5.2L is quicker than the 5.9L
redneckcntry 4 years ago
LOL! Range Rover is now the least reliable SUV availible in America according to JD powers. The top 5 most reliable car brands are as follows: Lexus, Buick, Lincoln, Mercury and Honda. Nowhere in there is any Euro car brand mentioned.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
and u know what a diesel such as duramax or cummins will kick any ANY germen cars ass in reliability so stfu
FORDGTFANATIC 4 years ago
it takes you 15 sec not 12 sec for go from 0-60 count the secs on the vid
flea112 4 years ago
damn it takes 2 years from 0 to 60 go get you a german suv!
privee111 4 years ago
Why, so it can break down 2 hours after buying it? My SUV will kick any german suv's ass.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
HELL yeah AMERICAN YEAH
mudbuddy54 4 years ago
my durango goes 0-60 in about 6.5
vanillasoldier 4 years ago
wow dude... something is wrong with that thing!!!!
My ram 1500 with 318 - 5.2 does 0-60 in 8.6 sec... and its 6200 lbs
I got a friend with a durango 360 - 5.9 and its faster than mine... so... ya
318supreme 4 years ago
I have an 03 SXT with a 4.7 and flowmasters with comp upgrade and kill 5.9l all day. 0-60 by G-tech Pro...7.18 sec. Love the sound of the big 8's though.
hunjosdad1 4 years ago
Does anyone notice the Check Engine light it on? No wonder it's slow...
dragonfire274 4 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
check out my durango on my page.
Floe4444 4 years ago
mistade u a fag using trucks to race is a wast of money yea its womens driver witch couldn't shift but wow 9.3 for 0-60 is really going to be fast a scion tc would smash on its ass all day
pier456 4 years ago
First of all, ur an idiot. What do you mean the woman driver couldnt shift? It was an auto. And second of all, scions are a giant POS. Go ride ur ricer elsewere
rockstarmz 4 years ago
well look at that she using auto which i'm sure she used manuel she be doing a lot worst scions pos lmao yea u can beleive wha u want
pier456 4 years ago
um... actually my dad was driving and it was me who was talking...yes I had a really HIGH voice back then.
Random1765 4 years ago
ok first of all i think we got started off wrong again oh wat is ur name again dip shit but yea it was auto and yea 9.3 ok wat ever this durango had sumthin messed up but wat ever you have fun with the scion tc man i have no problem with them but seriously they are a PIECE OF SHIT seriously they look like shit and i would sriously like to race you someday and beat ur ass with my durango or dakota.
mistade 4 years ago
This is actually my families car and it was from a long time ago, and yes the car sucks with speed, I know. But it was supposed to show how bad my car is... and yes any other car could beat it even another durango. just lettin u know that since u were pissed off.
Random1765 4 years ago
oh i wasnt pissed off at ya it was some guy saying other stuff and all but thanks for replying.
mistade 4 years ago
jus wondering what ya got in ur dakota 4.7?
crazynigg00 4 years ago
ok so fuck off and trucks for racing lets see is fun and aint a waste of money b/c it takes less to make my durango kick ur tc's ass then u putting a shit load into it to make it catch up with me ok have a fine day and now i think u missed ur daily beating of ur meat to ur boyfriend. good day and i hope you write back cause this is fun. thanks i think you left a comment here FAG!
mistade 4 years ago
wake me up when we get there
v551man 4 years ago
fuck yall the dodge durango kicks ass you dont even have to have a 5.9 a 5.2 does pretty damn well also we turned out over 400 horses in our 5.2 and hell we kicked ass and im tired of these people that are hating on dodge fuck all you haters. also they dont know how to drive so yea and it sounds like its a girl driving it. have a nice day
mistade 4 years ago 2
Let's all get defensive, why don't we? I drive a fullsize van with the 5.2, weighs 5300 pounds, 0-60 of 11 seconds. I'm currently converting it to high-flow (dynomax super turbo, magnaflow catcon). Let's see what difference that may make (Mine also slows way the hell down at 50mph)
ahanix1988 4 years ago
Every car company has lemons, I know someone who bought a brand new Honda and it has had nothing but problems since brand new. ur friend just had bad luck.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
Ya'll need to work on your 5.9 Rango's some more... i'm runnin 11.98 in the quarter on 35" super swampers
witerango 4 years ago
hey fruitbooter why would u spend all that money freakin ported heads sheesh
s172mch 4 years ago
Check engine light means your dodge is going to die with in 1k... I had this truck I like it but I couldn't keep the bitch on the road..
12GSlug 4 years ago
Well this video was taken a year ago and his Durango still runs like a champ (besides the lack of power) I the the Check Engine light was because of an o2 sensor.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
What year.. I had a 99 I went form fuse in the engine to alternator to other fuse in the tranny to blown heads to more fuses.. Then the trany start to ship 2nd and 3rd gear "which I think is your unpowered part". Then after a whole year of the truck running for two days at a time in a week I trade the bitch in.. I'm a pround Ford owner..
12GSlug 4 years ago
LOL I'm a jack ass.. I asked what year... Funny..
12GSlug 4 years ago
the reason you had problems with yours is because you didnt take care of it . if you take care of a dodge they will last forever. dodge has the longest lasting american desel pickup. if your really easy on it it will go for 400,000 miles. if you have a little fun evry once in a while youll get 350,000 out of it before problems start setting in.
dodgerules78102 4 years ago
LOL ok, Your tell me I dont know how to take care of a truck.. I got a 92 Ford bronco 240K all stock.. My daliy driver and 4x4 bitch..
Then a 78 Ford with 850k on the bitch...
Dodge sucks.. Cummins rules.. I got a 93 dodge 250 Cummins with 10K and has more problems then my 92 4x4 bitch!!!
"350K before have problems" You talking semi's?? Because that is the only cummins I've never seen stock go over 150k.
12GSlug 4 years ago
NO! "Bitch" semi's go for longer than that the cummins does go for that long you are full of shit. these hings are my life. i read everything that has to do with them i know what im talking about. i guess you've got really bad luck,and ford has spent $3,000,000 on gay pride organization. even when their on the edge of going bankrupt. they must really know how it feels to be gay. YOUR FULL OF SHIT , YOU DONT KNOW WHAT YOUR TALKIN ABOUT, 850K ON A GASSER YOUR FULL OF SHIT!
dodgerules78102 4 years ago
LOL I love how every litte bitch can't talk about truck and goes off on a bitch ass subject because they got owned...
OO shut up dodge has the most problems..
I hate stupid people..
12GSlug 4 years ago
99 Dodge problems?
OO may.. Frist water pumb when out.. Under warranty cost out of my pocket 500 bucks.. O found out the engine was linking other 250 to fix it.. Still under warranty miles 32K.. At 34K fuse keeps going out every 2 day or so.. Form alternator fuses to the fucking alternator.. Then a fuse goes out of the trany.. Cost 100 per fuse.. Still under warranty.. Over cost on that.. 500+ dallors..
12GSlug 4 years ago
After getting the truck looked at a 5 star dodge Reno.. 10 miles down the road trany started to jump.. Took to dodge they said it was fine.. Took to a shop they said the trany was gone..
Took it back to dodge.. Dodge did notting still under warranty.. Keep the bitch for other 4 months fix it every day.. Still under warranty..
Then traded it in for a Ford..
12GSlug 4 years ago
yeah your right dodge sucks because the jeep cherokee i had lasted about 100 miles before tranny blew out so ya daimler chrysler vehicles suck ass. someone i know has a cherrokee and its a pieco of shit 2 transmissions blown out so he trades in for explorer or expedition or somethin.
fuckyou631993 4 years ago
LOL yep I got a Explorer now and much much happier!!! Plus I can put the bitch into 4x4 drive and it does pop out..
12GSlug 4 years ago
yeah i will never buy a dodge except mabye the new challenger but im kinda leaning towards the camaro
fuckyou631993 4 years ago
i'll own your little 4.7 with my 5.9, plus i haul a 25' camper, your little 4.7 just doeswn't have the nuts to do that.
Jeepnut666 4 years ago
Something's definitely not right with that Durango doing 0-60 around 12 seconds. Definitely not making the power. Stock 0-60 would be much quicker, especially with the tow package.
MarcusCapeCanaveral 4 years ago
holy dogshit those 5.9s are slow. I prefer the 4.7 over anything. Mine hauls balls with the addition of a nice tune and k&n intake.
NKdude 4 years ago
well ill try to upload the video, i mean i drive it sometimes, the car is not my anymore. but it is in my driveway.
pfo335 4 years ago
i own 2001 245hp SLT V8, the official times is 9.1s 0-60. but i changed that, i did 2 little modifications that bumped my car to 295hp and 385 lb/tq. now its in the sports sedan range.
pfo335 4 years ago
Wow, 50hp with 2 small mods?! Nice! You should upload a vid of that.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
well i would, but its not exactly my car lol.
pfo335 4 years ago
You have the 5.9 too? im not sure what you did, because i cant think of any two small mods that can bump you that high. Especially when your 5.9 is only getting about 200hp and 280tq to the wheels.
fruittbooter 4 years ago
fyi- I have a 5.2 durango /w intake, ported tb, headers, exhaust, plugs/wires, superchips, and a 180tstat and i know i didnt gain 50hp from that. my 5.2 got stock about 190hp and 270tq to the wheels, im guessing that i have around 220hp and roughly 300tq to the wheels after all that. so, if you really did do two small mods id love to know so i can do them two, but honestly i dont see how thats possible. sorry kid.
fruittbooter 4 years ago
seriously do u guys think this car can beat a 1997 ford explorer sport, i have a friend who wants to race but i wasnt sure, i got mine to go 0-60 in 7.3, but he claims his durango can go 0-60 in 6.3 seconds, he has a stock 5.9L, what do u guys think?
jugoslavia 4 years ago
If your Explorer can do 0-60 in 7.3, and their Durango is completely stock then there is no way it would beat you. I'm pretty sure the official 0-60 time for the D with the 5.9 liter is 8.5 so I'd say you would probably win that race.
stanbernadino 4 years ago
ok thanx man
jugoslavia 4 years ago
Iv got the 5.9 R/T and my buds got the 2001 Expo n we actully met off the highway racing haha the Durango takes over the Explorer. its been done 2wice.good luck
amiralib 4 years ago
Mine is a 2003 SXT 4x4. Only mods are a dynomax muffler, and the resonator removed off the intake.
bgoins12 5 years ago
You definantely have something wrong with it. My '03 with the 4.7 pulls a 8.5 sec 0-60. Did you reroute your plug wires and only use copper core champion plugs? Otherwise, you may be getting excessive pinging, its common on the 5.2 and 5.9 powered durangos.
bgoins12 5 years ago
is that the magnum one?
jugoslavia 5 years ago
Oh come on David, you're just embarrassed because you sound dumb in the video, and because my Blazer is faster then your slow-ass Durango!
hehe
stanbernadino 5 years ago
haha! That's funny...I don't think he's read it yet.
jundseth 5 years ago
It's deffinetely better WITH sound.
jundseth 5 years ago
This is my car but its really slow (oh, and this was done by my friend). I wouldn't have posted such a stupid thing as this.
insane007 5 years ago