Thanks for demonstrate to us that one needs no humongous cameras to produce art work. I'm an old fashion photographer, from the 35mm era. Nowadays my work, studio or outdoors is done with bridge cameras like this one. You confirm my point of view that a camera is a work tool, not a show off contraption.
These are indeed very nice photos. However, it always kind of amuses me, how people evaluate the quality of a camera by watching Youtube videos. What it takes to do pictures like these and make them look good in a compressed web video is an inspired photographer, a nice set and some pretty models. The right camera isn't an issue here.
You need to see prints or uncompressed shots on a high-res-screen to judge the quality of a camera.
@DaStraingea True you do need to see the high-res photos but in this format, such that it is, at least gives the viewer some idea of what the camera is capable of. It also gets the photographer's name out there.
How's the flash sync speed of the camera, and what's your experience on lighting with it? Also, how's the performance, write times, and IQ?
What are the bad things about this camera?
I have one on pre-order and I'm starting to have second thoughts, because it could turn out to be a flop. I'd definitely like some insight from a skilled photographer
However, with your skill, I'm sure you can get these images with just about any camera.
x100 most likely
BigRooster747 3 months ago
@helcivic Yes... All these pictures I took with Finepix X - 1O . Jpg Format.
helcivic 3 months ago
@helcivic
How much better does it get with RAW?
Also very nice shots.
loafingsmurf 1 day ago
Thanks for your exquisite piece of work.
Thanks for demonstrate to us that one needs no humongous cameras to produce art work. I'm an old fashion photographer, from the 35mm era. Nowadays my work, studio or outdoors is done with bridge cameras like this one. You confirm my point of view that a camera is a work tool, not a show off contraption.
mario73926 3 months ago 8
@mario73926
These are indeed very nice photos. However, it always kind of amuses me, how people evaluate the quality of a camera by watching Youtube videos. What it takes to do pictures like these and make them look good in a compressed web video is an inspired photographer, a nice set and some pretty models. The right camera isn't an issue here.
You need to see prints or uncompressed shots on a high-res-screen to judge the quality of a camera.
DaStraingea 2 months ago 2
@DaStraingea True you do need to see the high-res photos but in this format, such that it is, at least gives the viewer some idea of what the camera is capable of. It also gets the photographer's name out there.
dbkfrogkaty1 1 month ago
How's the flash sync speed of the camera, and what's your experience on lighting with it? Also, how's the performance, write times, and IQ?
What are the bad things about this camera?
I have one on pre-order and I'm starting to have second thoughts, because it could turn out to be a flop. I'd definitely like some insight from a skilled photographer
However, with your skill, I'm sure you can get these images with just about any camera.
ikaikaarnado 4 months ago
Uh...gret pictures for a camera that's not available in NYC until November 2011.
EdVidz 4 months ago
WOW, I'm impressed, Amazing photos
hieulavoce 4 months ago
are all these photos from x10?
MrNeil501 4 months ago