hi. nice demo. i currently have a Nikon D60, and im thinking of buying a used D200 (body) for $550. do you think this would be a good buy for a older model? or should i go for the new D90 body for around $800.
i'm very new in SLR, i just bought Canon 300D, but the CF included was a 32mb card. too small. so i'm planning to buy 4gb Kingstone, is there a lot difference between 133x and 266x cf card? tq
Yes, Extreme III is a good card, I don't even need to show you the video. The Sony is also a good card (a little slower than the Extreme III but much cheaper when I got mine on sale), waiting to test out their new 300x card.
Yes, the A-Data is very slow. I'll try to avoid it - I was first attracted by the low price. The 120x transcend seems to be a good buy, should test out the 266x as well.
hi. nice demo. i currently have a Nikon D60, and im thinking of buying a used D200 (body) for $550. do you think this would be a good buy for a older model? or should i go for the new D90 body for around $800.
MrYoda1972 2 years ago
Yes, if the speed reported is correct but I noticed that some brand inflate their rating and doesn't give enough substain write rate.
bentse 2 years ago
i'm very new in SLR, i just bought Canon 300D, but the CF included was a 32mb card. too small. so i'm planning to buy 4gb Kingstone, is there a lot difference between 133x and 266x cf card? tq
dewatandas 2 years ago
So how is Compact Flash different from SD Cards?
TMASR001 2 years ago
just faster data transfer i think
darthsmidge 2 years ago
d200 can write just 10Mb/s no matter how fast card is.
CerBEER 2 years ago
that really slow for a 266x I have the same mp's as you and a kingston ult. 266x and it easily writes 10 RAW in 8 sec.
73irdman 2 years ago
266x is how many MBps (mega bytes per second)
adminforego2 3 years ago
around 40-45
73irdman 2 years ago
Good card,good camera.
Filiu1 3 years ago
This meant to be a CF card speed test, not camera test. Thanks for viewing.
bentse 3 years ago
you don't need to be shooting 18-21 continuous shots in RAW anyway, unless you're a moron. the card's fine; choose your shots wisely.
somejoeschmoe 3 years ago
except action sports sequences. I've shot 24 frame sequences and still come up short
lazlobass 2 years ago
Jeez... so slow!
dinksong 3 years ago
Extreme IV is good but pretty expensive.
Unless you have UDMA on your camera, the Sony 133x and the Transcend 120x,133x are pretty good.
bentse 3 years ago
A-data?? try Extreme IV 4 Gb ;-)
isma3000 4 years ago
Yes, Extreme III is a good card, I don't even need to show you the video. The Sony is also a good card (a little slower than the Extreme III but much cheaper when I got mine on sale), waiting to test out their new 300x card.
bentse 4 years ago
my..that's ridiculously slow =/
just got for the wonderful Sandisk Extreme III!! nvr failed me =)
cheers!
gr2k 4 years ago
eeeeeeeeeehhhhhham come onnnnnnnnn!!
nimacavalli 4 years ago
"A", "Data" => 1 at a time => slow
bentse 4 years ago
seems very slow
dryan2 4 years ago
Nik-on! idiot not Nike-on. Japanese don't have hard vowels. Also that card is stupidly slow
superphilman2 4 years ago
Yes, the A-Data is very slow. I'll try to avoid it - I was first attracted by the low price. The 120x transcend seems to be a good buy, should test out the 266x as well.
bentse 4 years ago
Is it just me or is that slower than the 120x transcend??
Thanks for posting this.
awksedgreep 4 years ago