As I figured--i asked Superjoe a simple direct question of what does a bigfoot eat and got--no response from him! What a shock. just more babble from the resident idiot. Funny how bigfooters will never answer a simple direct question about their giant apeman aint it?
@seymourbbest So you asked a guy a question yesterday, and he hasn't responded to you?? NO!! Maybe he, unlike YOU, has more pressing matters than posting here 9,000 times a week on this topic you mongoloid...
Superjoe how about you telling us what the dietary needs of thousands of bigfoot roaming the usa are? Tell us how they acquire the estimated 15000 calories a day they need?
"Bigfoots are such Ninjas in their own world." I just quoted that from Matt Moneymaker on Finding Bigfoot so it must be a fact. Herb you have to get big fat hairy floppy saggy breasted specimen captured or dead in a lab. Until this Patterson's film is a hoax.
That there is no proof. It is a man. In a costume.
The reason why is that I could say on the news that there is such thing as a giant 11 foot tall dog with 10 head and poops rainbows but i have no proof.
@alliesinger297 This is one of the most incorrect comments I have seen so far today. For one 98% of the worlds national habitat, wouldn't look at the person then attack it. If you actually did your research the only reason it looked back was, because Gimlin was behind it. Also as you stated before that it would run away is exactly what it did. Although it didn't run it did climb up a hill very hastely. They later showed the hill in a longer piece of the footage.
It is sad. This film is like their Bigfoot Qur'an. It can't be criticized and is indisputable proof of their hairy floppy-breasted diaper-assed deity.
How did this stupid bigfooter lie that gorilla suits weren't "invented" until 1970 get started? This is about the 3rd video I've seen this. Pathetic. If you're gonna lie at least put some effort into it like meldrum does....
@GamercastMMs who is "they" first got the gorilla suit?! lmao there has been gorilla suits made for almost 100 years now...King Kong (The Movie 1933) *hint hint*
Hey Poolboy Laughingstock is a wonky toothed brit who has never even been to the uSA but thinks we have giant apemen roaming around. Public ed in uK must be shitter than here in the usa.
@seymourbbest "Public ed in uK must be shitter than here in the usa"...if you want to tell us all how someone ELSE is so stupid, try to limit your spelling mistakes a bit more, you blathering retard..
""Bob heironimus has proved he was there that day.""
Bob Heironimus proved that he has never been to Bluff Creek in his life. He got EVERY SINGLE feature of the film site wrong......including the drive from the main road.
The footage itself PROVES that Bob Heironimus lied about everything to do with the film site.
The PGF shows a wet flowing creek, Roger standing ON the road and a clear unobstructed view to the far hillside. All things Bob H claimed the opposite to.
BS! Gimlin and patterson were not the only ones there that day...come on people, research! laughinggravy: everyone involved in this production is dishonest...go figure. .is that a coincidence? about as much as Patterson stumbling onto a bf like he did with all the known circumstances!
@seymourbbest - "Gimlin is a con man. He can not back up one claim he makes about the film" - what a mental midget. Name one claim he's made about the film he can't back up, just one. tool...
my guess is gimlin will take the lie to his grave along with Patterson. ..did anyone see bob h pass the lie detector test?? im sure it gets immediately discredited by the bf'ers..
Heironimus worked at the same factory for over 30 years. Apparently the owners were pleased with his work. Who are you to come in here and say he was a goof off? Gimlin is a con man. He can not back up one claim he makes about the film. That is where your scrutiny should be and not on heironimus' job performance.
Which version of when and where Patterson and Gimlin retrieved the 'suit' do you believe.
1. The version where Bob H says he never saw P & G come get the suit. He woke up the next morning and it was gone.
Or
2. The version where Bob H says the last he saw of the suit was when P & G came and took it away and they were 'picking their belts' with happiness and a job well done.
Which version do YOU believe?BOTH can't be true so Bob H simply MUST be lying about one of them.
Which Bob H version of the 'suit' do you believe?
1. Made from a smelly dead red horse with no fasteners or metal and with a t-shirt like torso that he had to wriggle into with waist high waders and in his stockinged feet inside the 'suit'?
Or.
2. Made from a fake fur Phil Morris suit with a zipper up and down the back, with knee high waders and was wearing his shoes inside the suit?
ok ppl. have you ever even thought there might be a slight teense-eensy-weensy chance that if this creature is real, some need to be a GIRL.srsly... dont be sexist ppl!
what about the face and feet....the face looks nothing like a bigfoot is suppose to with hair everywhere but the eyes(they messed that one up) and the feet are solid white with no pattern at all...they almost look like concrete...oh wait the EXPERTS already said he has white feet..lol..of course because all the other BF 'S caught have bright white bottoms to their feet?
very similar walking motion...you bigfooters wont settle for anything unless its a perfect match...impossible to recreate w/o the actual suit! not only that but bob h is now old and fat...how did he pass the lie detector test so easily? seriously do you believers just dismiss anything anti BF immediately? i mean shit there are plenty of vids out there proving the hoax but they hardly have any views at all..strange huh?
Matt Moneymaker is supposed to address the issue of why no one can get photos or videos of bigfoot on tonights episode of "finding bigfoot". Can't wait to see the greasy headed joke make up more crap.
@joeyvader i have watched that film...i see similarities but its not going to be exact..the guy has obviously put weight on! its no that uncommon actually as we get older! why do some posters claim to know so much about bigfoot...his body type, behavior, etc...what is this based on?? any idea how long people have been saying "theyll find one soon and then everyone will see?" since the 70's..still nothing but hoax after hoax..i wonder why? hmmmmm...
@poolboy5623 You see similarities between Heronimus stumbling about in that shaggy suit, and the sleek powerful gait of the Patterson subject..?? Really? Even the die hard skeptics really wish he hadn't have donned that suit..
@poolboy5623 Watch 'Bob Herinonimus walks in a bIgfoot suit' here on youtube...it's SO laughably lame that they REFUSED to release actual walking footage of him in the suit...all we get are a montage of stills, so NO side by side gait comparison can be made....wonder why??? hmmmm....
Many counties in Washington State in the 1970s implemented ordinances against the wanton destruction of one of them...now whether this was a an admission of their reality, or whether it was there to stop rednecks from shooting anything on two legs in the woods is unclear...but if I was a betting man I'd go with the latter..as for the 'wanton' destruction, upon killing one any lawyer could argue that classifying a species to science would hardly be considered 'wanton' destruction
@SUCKMEISTER005 ...there have been many instances when hunters HAVE had them under sights...pausing to wonder just WHAT it is they are looking at...? Many things would pass through ones mind...what if it's a fool in a suit? It's not a bear? WHAT is it?? By the time they evaluate just what to do, the animal has moved on...
@seymourbbest Munns estimates of height have little to do with his work on just how to connect a head like this to a body, and NOT covering it with shaggy hair..Many fx techs have expressed the SAME sentiment..Have the Oscar and Emmy award winning creature suit techs at Hensons' Creature shop been 'discredited' as well??
@seymourbbest His size estimates have little to do with body proportions moron...anyone wants to see REAL opinions on the film, and NOT this halfwits sad observations, watch "Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Bill Munns Analysis" or "AP Bigfoot" to see the Henson Creature Shop analysis of the film...REAL opinions, and not those of a mongoloid idiot..
I believe in bigfoot. Look of the Munns version of Pattersons film full version. The joints on the beast dont line up and if the hips lined up...the ankles on a human would be to high. with Paterson standing 100 yards away with a 15mm camera lense and the figure being .448 of an inch tall in the screen the height of the beast in the video would be 7 feet and 6 and a half inches (7' 6/2").And the odds of a human growing to be this tall in that time period is about 1 in 100 million. Enough said.
i agree bigfoots are real,but in regards to the patterson film, i beleive it to be fake, some people came forward a few years ago and said they did it, and after all the place this film was done is called "BLUFF CREEK" :)
@crazyknight2008 Actually those people never did it. They were just looking for popularity. Robert Patterson who filmed this passed away a couple years after this was filmed but Bob Gimlin who was with Robert when this was filmed still says that this film is 100% real. So sorry you were fooled by false information alot of people were
@crazyknight2008 the people who said they faked it are full of crap and have no proof,the guy who claims to be in the suit changes his story all the time
I don't see muscle movement or a ballistic strike. I see a costume wrinkle in places you would expect a costume to bulge and wrinkle when someone walks in one.
That's interesting...after carefully digitizing each from from a second gen copy of the film, the Oscar and Emmy winning fx techs at Henson's Creature Shop couldn't find any indication of a suit...one of them actaully said "If this is a suit, I have NO idea how they would have made it in 1967." Watch "AP Bigfoot" to see them at work...
@joeyvader I merely stated my opinion of what I see in the clip, personally I dont give a rats ass if bigfoot exists or not, it means nothing to me I wont be a penny richer if it does or doesnt.
@joeyvader .... BINGO !!! even Academy award winning SFX in 1968 film 'Planet of the Apes' only had ape heads, hands & feet.... NO FULL BODIED 'HAIR SUITS WERE EVER USED in the film !!!
@TheCrazyhorse001 The joints on the beast dont line up and if the hips lined up...the ankles on a human would be to high. with Paterson standing 100 yards away with a 15mm camera lense and the figure being .448 of an inch tall in the screen the height of the beast in the video would be 7 feet and 6 and a half inches (7' 6/2").And the odds of a human growing to be this tall in that time period is about 1 in 100 million. Enough said.
Check the intermembral index of Patty. It's either a human in a very sophisticated suit with arm extensions or it is something undocumented in the primate world. Whatever it(she) is, she's a fun conversational topic.
Yes, It is a hernia, but the leg is not buckling as you say. Sasquatches, unlike humans seem to not lock their knees when they walk. This is well documented.
"NOBODY" can say 100% that this is evidence of a real, living, biological creature! I have watched this video more times than I can count. People have to understand that the general population, especially scientists rely on "proof"..( a physical body, dead or alive") as evidence...Period! A million stories & sightings don't add up to a conclusion that bigfoot exists. I personally think the patterson video is very compelling.
number two# the high def analysis shows this particular bump to be an actual muscular heria you can see moving seemlessly with the other muscles of the leg. Also this is hardly the first or last bump issue brought up with other aspect of this creatures physiology, most have beem actual debuked as i stated before as matieral added in the multiply copied footage and not as legitmate arguement against the validity of this footage and creatures existence. Still the big tits never showin till later!!
@Thedeepesttruth Prove to me its validity. You dont think a bumch of sexist redneck republicans would have A.) either mention the breasts in jest on this costume or B.) never had made the costume blatantly female in the first place!! LOL! We did start to notice the breast till later when we had high tech for video analaysis. DUH
@Thedeepesttruth The ignorance of your post only strengthens your kool aid drinking affliation with the welfare party LOL. Dont spend your government checks all at once! Your half black nitwit is going down as one of the worst presidents ever and wont be there much longer!! LMAO.
number one# unless ur lookin at the original footage do you now how much forgien material gets put into the successive copys of this footage? alot. there is perfect analysis from 1st gene copy done with modern tech. that gets rid of these ridiculious "bump scepitcal analysis" that proves that its a female sasquach(I love how the guy who came out sayin he wore the suit didnt mention the gigantic TITS on it) and no person in costume even in prostectics can reproduce these movements. PERIOD!!
As opposed to Patterson? Haha patterson with a rap sheet? Patterson who had to be sued to return the camera back he filmed the hoax with? Patterson the shiftless bum who couldn't hold a job? Heironimus worked over 30 years at the same job and passed two polys. He blows patterson out of the water when it comes to reputation within their communities.
@seymourbbest Patterson is dead and can never refute these claims he did however owe alot of people money and that tends to piss people off...Heironimus may well have been able to hold down a job but he and Gimlin work at the same place when Gimlin was receiving commendations Heironimus was doing light janitorial work and spending altogether too much time in the coffee room subsequently being transferred to another facility stacking empty palates and delivering soda.
I think slow motion could have been used in conjunction. I had to keep smacking my mouse to get a "frame by frame" for the length I wanted. Thanks! Good info!
Duck--where have you been? Someone has come forward,bob heironimus. He's taken 2 polygraph tests the second of which is right here on YT.(Search: Pax lie dectector test)
@seymourbbest what you forget to mention is the fact that Heironimus has changed his story on what they used as a costume no less thatn three times on record. Never mind the fact of his background in his community where he wasn't believed to be very trust worthy as opposed to Patterson and Gimlin.
@stepintoyourmind Patterson was far from trust worthy. He was broke from a book he wrote that didn't sell.He got money from people to make this film. He never paid them back.He also rented the camera used to make the film and never returned it to it's owner.Plus if you watch the film while on horseback and riding while filming is more stable then standing still on the ground. I'm not saying bigfoot isn't real but this video has it's holes.Plus the "bulge" could be a wrinkle in a suit.
@awamrblack Last time i checked being broke doesnt necessarily make you untrustworthy. Heironimus however was a compulsive liar that wasnt respected in the town they lived in and claimed that Patterson and Gimlin both made money and that he wanted to make money from the film. I however do agree that this film does have its holes, but i dont believ the "bulge" to be one of them I have never seen a wrinkle behave that way.
@stepintoyourmind Being broke, lying,cheating,and conning people does make him untrustworthy.Plus if you (like Heironimus) were supposed to make money but you didn't like your two partners did wouldn't you get mad too? And the "bulge" looks like extra material bunching up when the leg goes up and the flattening back out when the leg goes down.just like laying a piece of material on a table and pushing it away from you it bunches up. But when you pull it back to you it goes flat.Just my opinions.
@awamrblack this is all assuming that it was a fake no? but yeah if someone screwed me on a grand i wouldnt try to smear them and expose them for a fake i would get what is mine ya know...you have brought up good points on Patterson's reliability assuming that Heironimus is telling the truth...I like many others just want the truth but in reality we all just have opinions the only people that know for sure are Gimlin and Heironimus as to what the truth really is.
@stepintoyourmind Yeah the truth is out there.....Some people just focus on if it's fake or not.I've looked at it from both sides. One guy says he wore the suit. One guy says he sold the suit. 7 people plus the guy who said he wore the suit got took for $1,000. A camera place got a camera stolen by the 2 guys that say it's a real video of Bigfoot. Don't get me wrong I do think "something" is out there. But this video not so much. Believers in this film will have no doubting it. But oh well....
One thing Petterson said self,in the video i made was my friend,not a Bigfoot,type it in a search bar and you wil hear that,Petterson interwiev about Bigfoot...Enough about disscusion and bullshit is it real or not,its not real,first footage is not real and every another is just made by people in coustumes...
If this is a costume it's a fucking good one. think about it's 1967 and no one had costumes that good, I think this is muscle definition, and why the tits? ask yourself why the tits? and if it is a costume how does this person walk so well in it? you say to yourself it looks fake, but you have never observed a bigfoot walking so how do you know? don't be so quick to dismiss in your limited knowledge, I don't know if it's real, but if it's fake its better than ALL the others.
@jelenic88 I'm sorry but that's the lamest evidence yet, in fact it's not even evidence, it's an assumption on syntax. And if he did fake it and someone was in the costume, which I am open to, where are they and why have they not come forward? It's been 45 years and I would imagine someone's ego couldn't last that long. yeah there's been loads of fake since, but there's been fake Armani jeans too, does that mean the original doesn't exist? I need more convincing
Okay I understand this could be Bigfoot, but in the video when it turns its head and keeps walking, it was reasoning. If Bigfoot is considered an animal, animals don't reason. If it was it, it would've at least ran faster or scope out the friend or foe
@ryomawwwe Animals do reason, you just think they don't. Observe any animal for longer than 20 minutes (sleeping doesn't count) and you will see it reason
@drewone08 hate to bust your bubble. hair and DNA has been found.. scientists have said it was an unknown Primate. many scientific studies have been made and they do agree Bigfoot is Real.
@jimmydcap It seems like Bigfoot/Bigfeet seem to be reclusive and want to stay out of our way or otherwise we would be hearing about bigfoot attacks. I'm not saying the don
t or wouldn't eat mean (not that I would know this) but I have to imagine that there would be at least a good amount of stories of campers being attacked by BF... I mean after all, a camper must look like a ham sandwich out in the woods, especially if these were aggressive or very territorial creatures like a bear.
@seymourbbest you are incorect. this is a real animal. a person could not fit in this body. that has already been proven. the legs and arm structure is differant than a human. we walk completely different than Bigfoot. our walking stride is is shorter. you need to do some real research before you make a foolis remark.
This is either real or one of the best hoaxes EVER. I also noticed the hair, its patchy and sparse in some places or in other words "Imperfect" just like in nature or like how real hair grows out of something...(NOT) like a suit!
I'm not sure how many posts you've made joey. 900 sounds about right. I know you're on every bigfoot vid I go to trying to get my attention. Get over your obsession of me. It isn't mutual.
n actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
That bigfoot is clearly a female.... look at the... boozums.. xD So is this video supposed to prove it being REAL or fake? O_O I think bigfoot is real.. x]
You REALLY need to lay off the PG film man! You are seeing more than what is actually there! You are not looking at the best possible prints anymore, Bill Munns has PROFESSIONALLY enhanced the film for the Monsterquest series last year or two years ago. I think what you originally did for the film and the bigfoot community was great. You just need to move on to new pastures and find something else to use your talents on.
Nobody on earth can prove santa or unicorns or werewolves or vampires or ghosts fake either. Fact is no one has to prove pgF fake. The folks claiming its real have to prove their claim. In 44 years they haven't.
Again as related to us in his book "big footprints" grover krantz tells us roger patterson had developed a way to make a fake bigfoot print in the soil not using a wooden cutout like had been done in the past. Krantz was quite clear that patterson faked bigfoot prints. Why the need to fake prints if the animal is real? You go to the trouble of working out a way to make fake bigfoot tracks just to show how to pour plaster in them? Hardly. Krantz was clear in his opinion.
if i am worng which i know iam not i dare anyone to present undinable solid proof even if it costs your life. and if you dtill believe all this then e-mail me i got some ocean fri\ont property in arizona iam willing to sell for cheap.
what goes up must come down, and for every action there is an equel and opposite reaction. there is just no scientific proof of there existance not one strand of hair, droppings(shit/feces),teeth, bones. come'on people besides foot prints and in some cases feces all these other attributes are non detirable/parishable proof, yet not one solid peice of evidence has been presented in bigfoots favor. Because they dont exist LUCY is more of a bigfoot than your acclaimed sasquatch
evry single bigfoot video in the world looks like shit hoaxed blurry shaky and all forms of wrong, but we can catch clear images deep within space that are a billion more times harder to catch. finding bigfoot will never have an epesode where the finally find them. always an infer-red image cut to commercial and next week there in another state when they where so close in the prior episode. slap yourself one time and say really, i should be a little too old for this.....
As he relates in his book "big footprints" grover krantz tells us Roger Patterson had developed a multiple step process for faking Bigfoot prints.my question is if bigfoot exists and Patterson was honest why the need to find a way to fake prints? Do researchers who photograph bears have a need to fake bear prints? No because bears are real and leave real prints.......
""As he relates in his book "big footprints" grover krantz tells us Roger Patterson had developed a multiple step process for faking Bigfoot prints.""
Stop spouting this rubbish.
Patterson didn't pass off that track as real so he wasn't 'faking' anything. He just dug a bigfoot track shaped hole in the ground for the specific purpose of demonstrating how to pour plaster and make castings.
Patterson never passed the track off as real and didn't claim it was real = no 'fake'.
""my question is if bigfoot exists and Patterson was honest why the need to find a way to fake prints""
He didn't 'fake' them. He wanted to demonstrate how to make a cast and how to pour plaster. If you have no track with which to demonstrate the technique then a good idea would be to make a track yourself for the benefit of the demonstration.
When professors in the medical profession demonstrate things for their students they often have a plastic skeleton, not a real skeleton.
So why did Patterson need a method to make fake bigfoot tracks? In his book grover krantz relates how patterson showed him the technique he had developed for making fake bigfoot tracks. If the animal is real and patterson was honest why the need to know how to make fake tracks? Does a guy who is interested in photoing lions need a way to make fake lion tracks?
Day 2 of what does bigfoot eat. And still no answer. Why can no one answer this most simple of bigfoot questions?
seymourbbest 4 hours ago
it was a wrinkle in the fabric the costume was made of- the guy who made it admitted it long ago
opnwndo 10 hours ago
As I figured--i asked Superjoe a simple direct question of what does a bigfoot eat and got--no response from him! What a shock. just more babble from the resident idiot. Funny how bigfooters will never answer a simple direct question about their giant apeman aint it?
seymourbbest 15 hours ago
@seymourbbest So you asked a guy a question yesterday, and he hasn't responded to you?? NO!! Maybe he, unlike YOU, has more pressing matters than posting here 9,000 times a week on this topic you mongoloid...
joeyvader 6 hours ago
may i ask who cares?
UhhYeahhiGetcha 20 hours ago
Wow! Magnificent creatures they are! I left my pregnant girlfriend 10 years ago to find bigfoot and theres not a day that i regret it. #thehuntison
keaka521 1 day ago
Superjoe how about you telling us what the dietary needs of thousands of bigfoot roaming the usa are? Tell us how they acquire the estimated 15000 calories a day they need?
seymourbbest 1 day ago
@seymourbbest
Bigfoot is no bigger than a large grizzly.................and there are thousands of them in North America.
LaughingGravy31 18 hours ago
"Bigfoots are such Ninjas in their own world." I just quoted that from Matt Moneymaker on Finding Bigfoot so it must be a fact. Herb you have to get big fat hairy floppy saggy breasted specimen captured or dead in a lab. Until this Patterson's film is a hoax.
BigHoaxFoot 1 day ago
@Herb----actually a specimen will have to be found for bigfoot to be real. But a specimen can never be found because bigfoot doesn't exist.
seymourbbest 2 days ago
The footage is real. It really is bigfoot.
Serpo71 2 days ago
This has been flagged as spam show
You know why this is fake?
That there is no proof. It is a man. In a costume.
The reason why is that I could say on the news that there is such thing as a giant 11 foot tall dog with 10 head and poops rainbows but i have no proof.
That is why
rummyrox 2 days ago
after watching this vid I am convinced........yeah, convinced I need to stop wandering on you tube
DeadButFeelingBetter 2 days ago
bigfoot had a boner..
REPx412 2 days ago
If you brought these people a dead body, they would STILL want more proof! Amazing!!
HerbWalker 2 days ago
i really dont believe the patterson film, it looks directly at the guy and it either would have run away, stared directly at it, or attacked it
alliesinger297 3 days ago
@alliesinger297 This is one of the most incorrect comments I have seen so far today. For one 98% of the worlds national habitat, wouldn't look at the person then attack it. If you actually did your research the only reason it looked back was, because Gimlin was behind it. Also as you stated before that it would run away is exactly what it did. Although it didn't run it did climb up a hill very hastely. They later showed the hill in a longer piece of the footage.
music1sawesome35 2 days ago
@music1sawesome35 The hill was to steep, and had so many different types of terrain for a human to climb up as quickly as it did.
music1sawesome35 2 days ago
It is sad. This film is like their Bigfoot Qur'an. It can't be criticized and is indisputable proof of their hairy floppy-breasted diaper-assed deity.
BigHoaxFoot 4 days ago
Yeah LaughingStock is like most bigfoot---purposely obtuse so they don't have to discuss the issues they have no answers for,which is all of them.
seymourbbest 4 days ago
@fglove073 /watch?v=MKUwdHex1Zs&list=LLvbc09AeqW5-TO_poz8-xoA&feature=mh_lolz look at this video
GamercastMMs 4 days ago
@seymourbbest lol i gave up with the gravyturd..i wish we had apemen roaming around...we simply do not, however...not like this video anyways..
poolboy5623 5 days ago
How did this stupid bigfooter lie that gorilla suits weren't "invented" until 1970 get started? This is about the 3rd video I've seen this. Pathetic. If you're gonna lie at least put some effort into it like meldrum does....
seymourbbest 6 days ago
First gorilla suit was in 1970? Wow you bigfooters get more desperate with each passing day
seymourbbest 6 days ago
this isnt fake, they first got the gorilla suit in the 1970, while this were recorded in 1967 :)
GamercastMMs 6 days ago
@GamercastMMs who is "they" first got the gorilla suit?! lmao there has been gorilla suits made for almost 100 years now...King Kong (The Movie 1933) *hint hint*
fglove073 4 days ago
Hey Poolboy Laughingstock is a wonky toothed brit who has never even been to the uSA but thinks we have giant apemen roaming around. Public ed in uK must be shitter than here in the usa.
seymourbbest 1 week ago 2
@seymourbbest "Public ed in uK must be shitter than here in the usa"...if you want to tell us all how someone ELSE is so stupid, try to limit your spelling mistakes a bit more, you blathering retard..
joeyvader 6 days ago
I was gonna say a penis joke, but was too long.
ytSouljah 1 week ago
Why r we debating, this is obviously bigfoot, this is no costume just look at the details and analysis.
jjjones64 1 week ago
so big foot has a big penis ....good for him
codbod210 1 week ago
@seymourbbest - yeah, he proved it by giving 2 completely descriptions of the suit he wore, and every detail of the Bluff Creek ravine wrong.
bobbybittmanrocks 1 week ago
so what he had a boner
Sherco125250 1 week ago
@Sherco125250 .... the swaying breasts seem to indicate it's a Female...
SuperJoeKent 1 day ago
@SuperJoeKent its a shemale
Sherco125250 1 day ago
Bob heironimus has proved he was there that day. (Wearing a cheapo ape suit too)
seymourbbest 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seymourbbest
""Bob heironimus has proved he was there that day.""
Bob Heironimus proved that he has never been to Bluff Creek in his life. He got EVERY SINGLE feature of the film site wrong......including the drive from the main road.
The footage itself PROVES that Bob Heironimus lied about everything to do with the film site.
The PGF shows a wet flowing creek, Roger standing ON the road and a clear unobstructed view to the far hillside. All things Bob H claimed the opposite to.
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
@poolboy5623 - you're obviously clueless. Who else was there that day?
bobbybittmanrocks 1 week ago
BS! Gimlin and patterson were not the only ones there that day...come on people, research! laughinggravy: everyone involved in this production is dishonest...go figure. .is that a coincidence? about as much as Patterson stumbling onto a bf like he did with all the known circumstances!
poolboy5623 1 week ago
@poolboy5623
I've researched this far more than you can ever dream. I know this inside out and upside down.
Bob Heironimous is a liar he is full of self contradictions and story changes.
Patterson has been dead for 40 years.
Bob Gimlin is not full of self contradictions and story changes.
Bob Gimlin can prove he was there and we have a film.
Bob Heironimous can't even prove he was in California in 1967.
Now why don't YOU do some research? You sound like a newbie.
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
@seymourbbest - "Gimlin is a con man. He can not back up one claim he makes about the film" - what a mental midget. Name one claim he's made about the film he can't back up, just one. tool...
bobbybittmanrocks 1 week ago
Folks that "bulge" is his "dong" or "wiener" sloped over his thigh. This is science fact.
jdycus 1 week ago
my guess is gimlin will take the lie to his grave along with Patterson. ..did anyone see bob h pass the lie detector test?? im sure it gets immediately discredited by the bf'ers..
poolboy5623 1 week ago
Heironimus worked at the same factory for over 30 years. Apparently the owners were pleased with his work. Who are you to come in here and say he was a goof off? Gimlin is a con man. He can not back up one claim he makes about the film. That is where your scrutiny should be and not on heironimus' job performance.
seymourbbest 1 week ago
@seymourbbest
""Heironimus worked at the same factory for over 30 years.""
And he LIED when he said there was a strike on at his firm Boise Cascade and that was how he could go down the Bluff Creek.
When it was found out that the strike was actually in 1966, not 1967 he knew he fvcked up and he changed his story once again.
Real honest guy that Bob Heironimus...............NOT!
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago 2
@seymourbbest
""Gimlin is a con man. He can not back up one claim he makes about the film.""
Really? I actually see a film that shows everything Bob G claimed regarding it.
I see a film that doesn't look anything like any man in a suit that either you or me have ever seen.
What has Bob Heironimus got to back himself up? He can't even prove he was even in California in 1967 haha.
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seymourbbest
Which Bob Heironimus 'version' of the filming do you believe?
1. Where Bob H says filming took place weeks before it was announced to the media.
Or
2. Where Bob H says Roger went into town to tell the media the VERY SAME DAY of the filming and thats why he took the 'suit' home in his car.
If you believe version 1 then Bob H must be LYING about version 2.
Which?
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seymourbbest
Which version of when and where Patterson and Gimlin retrieved the 'suit' do you believe.
1. The version where Bob H says he never saw P & G come get the suit. He woke up the next morning and it was gone.
Or
2. The version where Bob H says the last he saw of the suit was when P & G came and took it away and they were 'picking their belts' with happiness and a job well done.
Which version do YOU believe?BOTH can't be true so Bob H simply MUST be lying about one of them.
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seymourbbest
Which version of where Bob Heironimus spent the night after the filming do you believe?
1. The version where Bob H says he spent the night in a Eureka motel or.
2. The version where he says he drove home in his car all through the night.
What do YOU think? BOTH can't be true so Bob H simply MUST be lying about one of them.
Which version do YOU believe?
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seymourbbest
And the BIGGIE!
Which Bob H version of the 'suit' do you believe?
1. Made from a smelly dead red horse with no fasteners or metal and with a t-shirt like torso that he had to wriggle into with waist high waders and in his stockinged feet inside the 'suit'?
Or.
2. Made from a fake fur Phil Morris suit with a zipper up and down the back, with knee high waders and was wearing his shoes inside the suit?
Which version do YOU 'believe'?
Huh? Which one? BOTH can't be true.
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
its something stuck in her fur like a small stick or a cattail
saiaddict 1 week ago
@saiaddict THANK YOU FOR REALIZING THAT SOME OF THESE CREATURES NEED TO BE FEMALE!!!
UnforgetableBunny 1 week ago
@UnforgetableBunny lol how else would thay make more :)
saiaddict 1 week ago
0:44 EVERYDAY IM SHUFFLIN!!
sceniewenie123 1 week ago 2
Comment removed
sceniewenie123 1 week ago
that is an enhanced bulge...not original
rangersct 1 week ago
Comment removed
rangersct 1 week ago
ok ppl. have you ever even thought there might be a slight teense-eensy-weensy chance that if this creature is real, some need to be a GIRL.srsly... dont be sexist ppl!
UnforgetableBunny 1 week ago
what about the face and feet....the face looks nothing like a bigfoot is suppose to with hair everywhere but the eyes(they messed that one up) and the feet are solid white with no pattern at all...they almost look like concrete...oh wait the EXPERTS already said he has white feet..lol..of course because all the other BF 'S caught have bright white bottoms to their feet?
poolboy5623 1 week ago
very similar walking motion...you bigfooters wont settle for anything unless its a perfect match...impossible to recreate w/o the actual suit! not only that but bob h is now old and fat...how did he pass the lie detector test so easily? seriously do you believers just dismiss anything anti BF immediately? i mean shit there are plenty of vids out there proving the hoax but they hardly have any views at all..strange huh?
poolboy5623 1 week ago
Matt Moneymaker is supposed to address the issue of why no one can get photos or videos of bigfoot on tonights episode of "finding bigfoot". Can't wait to see the greasy headed joke make up more crap.
seymourbbest 1 week ago
lol its not a hernia hes jst hung ;) LMAO
wiggles505 1 week ago
the fact that people still believe in such a shitty film done by a few shitty men blows my mind! but it is entertaining to read..
poolboy5623 1 week ago
@poolboy5623
Blows your mind?
Buy a gun and just blow your fvcking brains out with a bullet and save us all from your posts.
LaughingGravy31 1 week ago
@poolboy5623 .... P/G film is the most studied piece of footage in history, second only to the Zabruder film (Kennedy assassination).
SuperJoeKent 1 day ago
@joeyvader i have watched that film...i see similarities but its not going to be exact..the guy has obviously put weight on! its no that uncommon actually as we get older! why do some posters claim to know so much about bigfoot...his body type, behavior, etc...what is this based on?? any idea how long people have been saying "theyll find one soon and then everyone will see?" since the 70's..still nothing but hoax after hoax..i wonder why? hmmmmm...
poolboy5623 1 week ago
@poolboy5623 You see similarities between Heronimus stumbling about in that shaggy suit, and the sleek powerful gait of the Patterson subject..?? Really? Even the die hard skeptics really wish he hadn't have donned that suit..
joeyvader 1 week ago
Damn Bigfoot, you can dance yo ass off!
MikeNitro94 1 week ago
@SuperTestfreak so now the people that say this is staged are full of crap?? REALLY? wow that is beyond funny!
poolboy5623 1 week ago
@poolboy5623 Watch 'Bob Herinonimus walks in a bIgfoot suit' here on youtube...it's SO laughably lame that they REFUSED to release actual walking footage of him in the suit...all we get are a montage of stills, so NO side by side gait comparison can be made....wonder why??? hmmmm....
joeyvader 1 week ago
Legally...what would happen if someone shot one?
SUCKMEISTER005 1 week ago
Many counties in Washington State in the 1970s implemented ordinances against the wanton destruction of one of them...now whether this was a an admission of their reality, or whether it was there to stop rednecks from shooting anything on two legs in the woods is unclear...but if I was a betting man I'd go with the latter..as for the 'wanton' destruction, upon killing one any lawyer could argue that classifying a species to science would hardly be considered 'wanton' destruction
joeyvader 1 week ago
@SUCKMEISTER005 ...there have been many instances when hunters HAVE had them under sights...pausing to wonder just WHAT it is they are looking at...? Many things would pass through ones mind...what if it's a fool in a suit? It's not a bear? WHAT is it?? By the time they evaluate just what to do, the animal has moved on...
joeyvader 1 week ago
Munns has been discredited. He used fuzzy math in his quesstimations. Nuff said.
seymourbbest 1 week ago
@seymourbbest Munns estimates of height have little to do with his work on just how to connect a head like this to a body, and NOT covering it with shaggy hair..Many fx techs have expressed the SAME sentiment..Have the Oscar and Emmy award winning creature suit techs at Hensons' Creature shop been 'discredited' as well??
joeyvader 1 week ago
@seymourbbest His size estimates have little to do with body proportions moron...anyone wants to see REAL opinions on the film, and NOT this halfwits sad observations, watch "Patterson Gimlin Bigfoot Film- Bill Munns Analysis" or "AP Bigfoot" to see the Henson Creature Shop analysis of the film...REAL opinions, and not those of a mongoloid idiot..
joeyvader 1 week ago
yeah me too, i believe bigfoot only walks one direction and never returns, must half way across the world by now and no one else has seen it again.
robh64 1 week ago
I believe in bigfoot. Look of the Munns version of Pattersons film full version. The joints on the beast dont line up and if the hips lined up...the ankles on a human would be to high. with Paterson standing 100 yards away with a 15mm camera lense and the figure being .448 of an inch tall in the screen the height of the beast in the video would be 7 feet and 6 and a half inches (7' 6/2").And the odds of a human growing to be this tall in that time period is about 1 in 100 million. Enough said.
ConnorMH98 2 weeks ago
i agree bigfoots are real,but in regards to the patterson film, i beleive it to be fake, some people came forward a few years ago and said they did it, and after all the place this film was done is called "BLUFF CREEK" :)
crazyknight2008 2 weeks ago
Comment removed
Zathomo 1 week ago
@crazyknight2008 Actually those people never did it. They were just looking for popularity. Robert Patterson who filmed this passed away a couple years after this was filmed but Bob Gimlin who was with Robert when this was filmed still says that this film is 100% real. So sorry you were fooled by false information alot of people were
Zathomo 1 week ago
@Zathomo its roger not robert
SuperTestfreak 1 week ago
@SuperTestfreak I am well aware
Zathomo 1 week ago
@crazyknight2008 the people who said they faked it are full of crap and have no proof,the guy who claims to be in the suit changes his story all the time
SuperTestfreak 1 week ago
I don't see muscle movement or a ballistic strike. I see a costume wrinkle in places you would expect a costume to bulge and wrinkle when someone walks in one.
TheCrazyhorse001 2 weeks ago
@TheCrazyhorse001 They do not even have costumes this realistic in 2012 let alone back in 1967.
SUCKMEISTER005 2 weeks ago 2
@SUCKMEISTER005 you are 100% right!!!
SuperTestfreak 1 week ago
That's interesting...after carefully digitizing each from from a second gen copy of the film, the Oscar and Emmy winning fx techs at Henson's Creature Shop couldn't find any indication of a suit...one of them actaully said "If this is a suit, I have NO idea how they would have made it in 1967." Watch "AP Bigfoot" to see them at work...
joeyvader 2 weeks ago
@joeyvader I merely stated my opinion of what I see in the clip, personally I dont give a rats ass if bigfoot exists or not, it means nothing to me I wont be a penny richer if it does or doesnt.
TheCrazyhorse001 2 weeks ago
@joeyvader .... BINGO !!! even Academy award winning SFX in 1968 film 'Planet of the Apes' only had ape heads, hands & feet.... NO FULL BODIED 'HAIR SUITS WERE EVER USED in the film !!!
SuperJoeKent 1 day ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@TheCrazyhorse001 The joints on the beast dont line up and if the hips lined up...the ankles on a human would be to high. with Paterson standing 100 yards away with a 15mm camera lense and the figure being .448 of an inch tall in the screen the height of the beast in the video would be 7 feet and 6 and a half inches (7' 6/2").And the odds of a human growing to be this tall in that time period is about 1 in 100 million. Enough said.
ConnorMH98 2 weeks ago
that is a real bigfoot, just look at the proportions, how could any human do that
jjjones64 2 weeks ago
@jjjones64 yeah no kidding, a human might come back to this place, bigfoots only visit an area once a lifetime
robh64 1 week ago
Heironimus's walk is identical. Nice fake for its time.
liondoghound 2 weeks ago
Check the intermembral index of Patty. It's either a human in a very sophisticated suit with arm extensions or it is something undocumented in the primate world. Whatever it(she) is, she's a fun conversational topic.
sherbil100 2 weeks ago
LOL HES ALWAYS SMACKIN HIS ASS AND HIS DICK XD
astaireisley 2 weeks ago
Just his fannie pack ...
sjaequusassinus 2 weeks ago
Cancer.
LOVEstarrystar33 2 weeks ago
looks like its masturbating..
garenanerag 2 weeks ago
Well documented? Please refer us to a scientific source where anything about bigfoot is "well documented".
seymourbbest 2 weeks ago
Yes, It is a hernia, but the leg is not buckling as you say. Sasquatches, unlike humans seem to not lock their knees when they walk. This is well documented.
smokeyhunterparrot 2 weeks ago
"NOBODY" can say 100% that this is evidence of a real, living, biological creature! I have watched this video more times than I can count. People have to understand that the general population, especially scientists rely on "proof"..( a physical body, dead or alive") as evidence...Period! A million stories & sightings don't add up to a conclusion that bigfoot exists. I personally think the patterson video is very compelling.
deanerdog1 2 weeks ago
why the fork am I looking at the so called "Hernia" ???!!
marvel4287 2 weeks ago
BIGFOOT !
DoinLifeProductions 2 weeks ago
Bigfoot doesn't exist. Obama will be re-elected.
seymourbbest 3 weeks ago
number two# the high def analysis shows this particular bump to be an actual muscular heria you can see moving seemlessly with the other muscles of the leg. Also this is hardly the first or last bump issue brought up with other aspect of this creatures physiology, most have beem actual debuked as i stated before as matieral added in the multiply copied footage and not as legitmate arguement against the validity of this footage and creatures existence. Still the big tits never showin till later!!
Thedeepesttruth 3 weeks ago
@Thedeepesttruth Prove to me its validity. You dont think a bumch of sexist redneck republicans would have A.) either mention the breasts in jest on this costume or B.) never had made the costume blatantly female in the first place!! LOL! We did start to notice the breast till later when we had high tech for video analaysis. DUH
Thedeepesttruth 3 weeks ago
@Thedeepesttruth The ignorance of your post only strengthens your kool aid drinking affliation with the welfare party LOL. Dont spend your government checks all at once! Your half black nitwit is going down as one of the worst presidents ever and wont be there much longer!! LMAO.
Sportsguy574 3 weeks ago
number one# unless ur lookin at the original footage do you now how much forgien material gets put into the successive copys of this footage? alot. there is perfect analysis from 1st gene copy done with modern tech. that gets rid of these ridiculious "bump scepitcal analysis" that proves that its a female sasquach(I love how the guy who came out sayin he wore the suit didnt mention the gigantic TITS on it) and no person in costume even in prostectics can reproduce these movements. PERIOD!!
Thedeepesttruth 3 weeks ago
As opposed to Patterson? Haha patterson with a rap sheet? Patterson who had to be sued to return the camera back he filmed the hoax with? Patterson the shiftless bum who couldn't hold a job? Heironimus worked over 30 years at the same job and passed two polys. He blows patterson out of the water when it comes to reputation within their communities.
seymourbbest 3 weeks ago
@seymourbbest Patterson is dead and can never refute these claims he did however owe alot of people money and that tends to piss people off...Heironimus may well have been able to hold down a job but he and Gimlin work at the same place when Gimlin was receiving commendations Heironimus was doing light janitorial work and spending altogether too much time in the coffee room subsequently being transferred to another facility stacking empty palates and delivering soda.
stepintoyourmind 1 week ago
the bulge is where the guy in the costume kept his toll money
nuttypagal 3 weeks ago
I think slow motion could have been used in conjunction. I had to keep smacking my mouse to get a "frame by frame" for the length I wanted. Thanks! Good info!
symphonicaura 3 weeks ago
dance now now now dance with a bulge with bigfoot too
minecarftEPIC 3 weeks ago
Duck--where have you been? Someone has come forward,bob heironimus. He's taken 2 polygraph tests the second of which is right here on YT.(Search: Pax lie dectector test)
seymourbbest 3 weeks ago
@seymourbbest what you forget to mention is the fact that Heironimus has changed his story on what they used as a costume no less thatn three times on record. Never mind the fact of his background in his community where he wasn't believed to be very trust worthy as opposed to Patterson and Gimlin.
stepintoyourmind 3 weeks ago 16
@stepintoyourmind Patterson was far from trust worthy. He was broke from a book he wrote that didn't sell.He got money from people to make this film. He never paid them back.He also rented the camera used to make the film and never returned it to it's owner.Plus if you watch the film while on horseback and riding while filming is more stable then standing still on the ground. I'm not saying bigfoot isn't real but this video has it's holes.Plus the "bulge" could be a wrinkle in a suit.
awamrblack 1 week ago
@awamrblack Last time i checked being broke doesnt necessarily make you untrustworthy. Heironimus however was a compulsive liar that wasnt respected in the town they lived in and claimed that Patterson and Gimlin both made money and that he wanted to make money from the film. I however do agree that this film does have its holes, but i dont believ the "bulge" to be one of them I have never seen a wrinkle behave that way.
stepintoyourmind 1 week ago
@stepintoyourmind Being broke, lying,cheating,and conning people does make him untrustworthy.Plus if you (like Heironimus) were supposed to make money but you didn't like your two partners did wouldn't you get mad too? And the "bulge" looks like extra material bunching up when the leg goes up and the flattening back out when the leg goes down.just like laying a piece of material on a table and pushing it away from you it bunches up. But when you pull it back to you it goes flat.Just my opinions.
awamrblack 1 week ago
@awamrblack this is all assuming that it was a fake no? but yeah if someone screwed me on a grand i wouldnt try to smear them and expose them for a fake i would get what is mine ya know...you have brought up good points on Patterson's reliability assuming that Heironimus is telling the truth...I like many others just want the truth but in reality we all just have opinions the only people that know for sure are Gimlin and Heironimus as to what the truth really is.
stepintoyourmind 1 week ago
@stepintoyourmind Yeah the truth is out there.....Some people just focus on if it's fake or not.I've looked at it from both sides. One guy says he wore the suit. One guy says he sold the suit. 7 people plus the guy who said he wore the suit got took for $1,000. A camera place got a camera stolen by the 2 guys that say it's a real video of Bigfoot. Don't get me wrong I do think "something" is out there. But this video not so much. Believers in this film will have no doubting it. But oh well....
awamrblack 1 week ago
One thing Petterson said self,in the video i made was my friend,not a Bigfoot,type it in a search bar and you wil hear that,Petterson interwiev about Bigfoot...Enough about disscusion and bullshit is it real or not,its not real,first footage is not real and every another is just made by people in coustumes...
jelenic88 3 weeks ago
Duck---you can say it walks real but you've never seen one so how do you know?
seymourbbest 3 weeks ago
ummm, never-mind
swampgatorman1 3 weeks ago
If this is a costume it's a fucking good one. think about it's 1967 and no one had costumes that good, I think this is muscle definition, and why the tits? ask yourself why the tits? and if it is a costume how does this person walk so well in it? you say to yourself it looks fake, but you have never observed a bigfoot walking so how do you know? don't be so quick to dismiss in your limited knowledge, I don't know if it's real, but if it's fake its better than ALL the others.
ducksbumhole 3 weeks ago
@ducksbumhole read my comment
jelenic88 3 weeks ago
@jelenic88 I'm sorry but that's the lamest evidence yet, in fact it's not even evidence, it's an assumption on syntax. And if he did fake it and someone was in the costume, which I am open to, where are they and why have they not come forward? It's been 45 years and I would imagine someone's ego couldn't last that long. yeah there's been loads of fake since, but there's been fake Armani jeans too, does that mean the original doesn't exist? I need more convincing
ducksbumhole 3 weeks ago
Okay I understand this could be Bigfoot, but in the video when it turns its head and keeps walking, it was reasoning. If Bigfoot is considered an animal, animals don't reason. If it was it, it would've at least ran faster or scope out the friend or foe
ryomawwwe 3 weeks ago
@ryomawwwe Animals do reason, you just think they don't. Observe any animal for longer than 20 minutes (sleeping doesn't count) and you will see it reason
ducksbumhole 3 weeks ago
Wow, idiots will make up anything to pretend this guy in a costume was a real animal. Now bullets strikes? Pathetic!
19nisey69 3 weeks ago
Jimmy you can't spell worth a shit. I doubt you even know your own birth date much less anything about the fauna of the USA.
seymourbbest 3 weeks ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Help the cause! go to crowdtilt and help me fund my bigfoot expedition !!
manohalo12345 3 weeks ago
this is ture u guys patterson shoot at it i reseched it
airsoftwarsification 3 weeks ago
@drewone08 hate to bust your bubble. hair and DNA has been found.. scientists have said it was an unknown Primate. many scientific studies have been made and they do agree Bigfoot is Real.
jimmydcap 4 weeks ago 11
@jimmydcap It seems like Bigfoot/Bigfeet seem to be reclusive and want to stay out of our way or otherwise we would be hearing about bigfoot attacks. I'm not saying the don
t or wouldn't eat mean (not that I would know this) but I have to imagine that there would be at least a good amount of stories of campers being attacked by BF... I mean after all, a camper must look like a ham sandwich out in the woods, especially if these were aggressive or very territorial creatures like a bear.
koolmaaan 2 weeks ago
@seymourbbest you are incorect. this is a real animal. a person could not fit in this body. that has already been proven. the legs and arm structure is differant than a human. we walk completely different than Bigfoot. our walking stride is is shorter. you need to do some real research before you make a foolis remark.
jimmydcap 4 weeks ago
zoom in on the breasts you can see nipples
igivurps 4 weeks ago
That's because its a cheapo ape suit. About 400 bucks.
seymourbbest 1 month ago
@seymourbbest cheapsuit lol,thats rich
SuperTestfreak 4 weeks ago
This is either real or one of the best hoaxes EVER. I also noticed the hair, its patchy and sparse in some places or in other words "Imperfect" just like in nature or like how real hair grows out of something...(NOT) like a suit!
Tuco7603 1 month ago
I'm not sure how many posts you've made joey. 900 sounds about right. I know you're on every bigfoot vid I go to trying to get my attention. Get over your obsession of me. It isn't mutual.
seymourbbest 1 month ago
@seymourbbest
Joey "I'll kill you if I ever see you" Vader has the weakest "arguments" I've ever heard. He's pathetic. Ask him about Rodney Meldrum, lol.
eminboztepe 1 month ago
This has been flagged as spam show
n actual STARGATE/PORTAL-THING was caught on film in New Mexico. The footage can be found within the short-film entitled "SUDDEN PORTHOLE", which is parked at the PROJECT CAMELOT YouTube page (it's under the George Noory video).
I'm not selling anything…just trying to spread the word about the unseen-dimensions we find ourselves embedded in.
My BLOG @ samzurick*dot*com contains peripheral data regarding the movie and is where I reply to the "debunkers". THANKS!!
peopledick 1 month ago
That bigfoot is clearly a female.... look at the... boozums.. xD So is this video supposed to prove it being REAL or fake? O_O I think bigfoot is real.. x]
zootycoon2freakgirl 1 month ago
@zootycoon2freakgirl
Please listen to redicecreations com radio Jeff Hilling - Hour 1 - The Patterson Bigfoot Film January 29, 2012
ssmaan44 1 month ago
Add melba ketchum to the bigfoot joke list
seymourbbest 1 month ago
Munns is a joke like krantz and meldrum and biscardi.
seymourbbest 2 months ago
@seymourbbest Yes...but YOU are not a joke are you...how many posts this week??? 900?? an even 1000?? Who's a sad joke...??
joeyvader 1 month ago
You REALLY need to lay off the PG film man! You are seeing more than what is actually there! You are not looking at the best possible prints anymore, Bill Munns has PROFESSIONALLY enhanced the film for the Monsterquest series last year or two years ago. I think what you originally did for the film and the bigfoot community was great. You just need to move on to new pastures and find something else to use your talents on.
squatchwatcher2 2 months ago
Ketchum report do out any day now! Thatll shut the skeptics and\ or cynics up won't it!?!?
seymourbbest 2 months ago
Nobody on earth can prove santa or unicorns or werewolves or vampires or ghosts fake either. Fact is no one has to prove pgF fake. The folks claiming its real have to prove their claim. In 44 years they haven't.
seymourbbest 2 months ago
nobody on earth can prove this film fake,thats because it isnt fake
SuperTestfreak 2 months ago
Again as related to us in his book "big footprints" grover krantz tells us roger patterson had developed a way to make a fake bigfoot print in the soil not using a wooden cutout like had been done in the past. Krantz was quite clear that patterson faked bigfoot prints. Why the need to fake prints if the animal is real? You go to the trouble of working out a way to make fake bigfoot tracks just to show how to pour plaster in them? Hardly. Krantz was clear in his opinion.
seymourbbest 2 months ago
@drewone08 , can you present your proof that the pgf is a hoax..can you do something that no other person has yet to do ?
Jrld11 2 months ago
if i am worng which i know iam not i dare anyone to present undinable solid proof even if it costs your life. and if you dtill believe all this then e-mail me i got some ocean fri\ont property in arizona iam willing to sell for cheap.
drewone08 2 months ago
what goes up must come down, and for every action there is an equel and opposite reaction. there is just no scientific proof of there existance not one strand of hair, droppings(shit/feces),teeth, bones. come'on people besides foot prints and in some cases feces all these other attributes are non detirable/parishable proof, yet not one solid peice of evidence has been presented in bigfoots favor. Because they dont exist LUCY is more of a bigfoot than your acclaimed sasquatch
drewone08 2 months ago
evry single bigfoot video in the world looks like shit hoaxed blurry shaky and all forms of wrong, but we can catch clear images deep within space that are a billion more times harder to catch. finding bigfoot will never have an epesode where the finally find them. always an infer-red image cut to commercial and next week there in another state when they where so close in the prior episode. slap yourself one time and say really, i should be a little too old for this.....
drewone08 2 months ago
1,000,000,000, dollers says your full of shit..The sad part is you know it too.
drewone08 2 months ago
As he relates in his book "big footprints" grover krantz tells us Roger Patterson had developed a multiple step process for faking Bigfoot prints.my question is if bigfoot exists and Patterson was honest why the need to find a way to fake prints? Do researchers who photograph bears have a need to fake bear prints? No because bears are real and leave real prints.......
seymourbbest 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@seymourbbest
""As he relates in his book "big footprints" grover krantz tells us Roger Patterson had developed a multiple step process for faking Bigfoot prints.""
Stop spouting this rubbish.
Patterson didn't pass off that track as real so he wasn't 'faking' anything. He just dug a bigfoot track shaped hole in the ground for the specific purpose of demonstrating how to pour plaster and make castings.
Patterson never passed the track off as real and didn't claim it was real = no 'fake'.
LaughingGravy31 2 months ago
@seymourbbest
""my question is if bigfoot exists and Patterson was honest why the need to find a way to fake prints""
He didn't 'fake' them. He wanted to demonstrate how to make a cast and how to pour plaster. If you have no track with which to demonstrate the technique then a good idea would be to make a track yourself for the benefit of the demonstration.
When professors in the medical profession demonstrate things for their students they often have a plastic skeleton, not a real skeleton.
LaughingGravy31 2 months ago
seymourbbest still arguing with people about something he doesnt believe in. Months later, on multiple videos.
SonicCrimeBeast 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@SonicCrimeBeast
""seymourbbest still arguing with people about something he doesnt believe in. Months later, on multiple videos.""
It's his life. He's got nothing else to live for.
The poor kid.
LaughingGravy31 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
So why did Patterson need a method to make fake bigfoot tracks? In his book grover krantz relates how patterson showed him the technique he had developed for making fake bigfoot tracks. If the animal is real and patterson was honest why the need to know how to make fake tracks? Does a guy who is interested in photoing lions need a way to make fake lion tracks?
seymourbbest 2 months ago
bigfoot has a twitter@BigfootKnobby
RevoinAmerica 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bob h is a lying fat cod eyed cunt..dont you idiots see that him claiming that is bollocks ? come on guys for fuck sake
Jrld11 2 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
Bob heironimus stated this bulge was probably a large set of keys he always carried. In over 44 years since no one has proved otherwise.
seymourbbest