In the end, he only had a few key arguments, and won with those because they were strong. Neither debater tried to win by spreading the other out of the round (a fancy way of saying avoiding clash). I respect that, and I wish more LDers (especially old fashioned judges and coaches) were friendlier to faster, more technical debate, as long as it retains its persuasion and and academic integrity.
This was a very good round. As a high school LDer, I get really pissed off when people use speed and carded evidence, but ONLY when they use those methods to avoid clash, skimp on analysis, and not link through. All the AFF's arguments were well constructed, and he used his increased speed (not nearly policy speed, I know) to go deeper with his analytics instead of just reading more arguments.
I debate policy too. I didn't say that people don't go faster, they go much faster. What I said was that people who are unfamiliar with policy often perceive this kind of thing as fast.
The material has been opened up a lot in the past year alone. Counterplans are run, DA's are expected, and kritiks are run every tourney. Boyer's Debate Cooperative debate camp is largely responsible for better evidence and blocks in the league. It churned out cases, DAs, CPs and a kritik that most schools based their files around.
Policy-makers have effectively replaced the stock issues makeup of judges.
His 2AR sounds much better than his 1AC. I think he is clearer and using more hand motions than he was to begin with. Still, he is having a hard time looking away from his paper.
FYI, the Affirmative (Senior, Spencer Harris from Drury University) wins on a 5-0 decision over the Negative (Sophomore, Jessica Furgerson from Western Kentucky University).
Congratulations to both debaters on reaching the finals!
lol "there are more reasons to vote for the affirmative than there are ld debaters"
deathdrain123 1 year ago
In the end, he only had a few key arguments, and won with those because they were strong. Neither debater tried to win by spreading the other out of the round (a fancy way of saying avoiding clash). I respect that, and I wish more LDers (especially old fashioned judges and coaches) were friendlier to faster, more technical debate, as long as it retains its persuasion and and academic integrity.
meinperpetualmotion 1 year ago
This was a very good round. As a high school LDer, I get really pissed off when people use speed and carded evidence, but ONLY when they use those methods to avoid clash, skimp on analysis, and not link through. All the AFF's arguments were well constructed, and he used his increased speed (not nearly policy speed, I know) to go deeper with his analytics instead of just reading more arguments.
meinperpetualmotion 1 year ago
he's a little faster than normal. not bad for nationals i guess
charcoalc5 1 year ago
thats not even 250.
try maybe 130, 150 tops.
nevertheless, this is a nice speed for ld'ers
TaeKwonDo1011 2 years ago
hahaaaaaaaaaaa hahaha he talks so high ....
j0hnny4eyes 2 years ago
Guys this is NFA LD its a form of college debate. This is not the LD you guys are used to in HS.
spydermrj 3 years ago
This is not LD. This was last years policy topic, and you are running DAs, referring to links, and talking at Advanced Policy speed.
KabaneTheChristian 3 years ago
This is LD POLICY. It is a policy topic with DAs and links. The question being discussed is whether speed is acceptable.
iliketrains76 2 years ago
Also, this is NOT last year's HS policy topic. That was a much broader resolution.
bonavex 2 years ago
how is this fast
thelastmim 2 years ago
If you've never debated policy before, this is extremely fast.
KabaneTheChristian 2 years ago
I debate policy- i'm pretty sure im like 3x faster than this and alot of people are alot- he's going like 250 wpm
thelastmim 2 years ago
I debate policy too. I didn't say that people don't go faster, they go much faster. What I said was that people who are unfamiliar with policy often perceive this kind of thing as fast.
KabaneTheChristian 2 years ago
Glad to see LD shifting towards policy speed
CallMeGoat 3 years ago
On second thought, how is this LD? Counter-plans and DA's and stuff
CallMeGoat 3 years ago
College LD is literally single person policy debate with LD Times.
Turtlehoop 3 years ago
So is there a collegiate equivalent of the high school LD "values" debate and if so, what?
Lov3s2Spooge 2 years ago
This has been flagged as spam show
I don't believe that there is.
Turtlehoop 2 years ago
The material has been opened up a lot in the past year alone. Counterplans are run, DA's are expected, and kritiks are run every tourney. Boyer's Debate Cooperative debate camp is largely responsible for better evidence and blocks in the league. It churned out cases, DAs, CPs and a kritik that most schools based their files around.
Policy-makers have effectively replaced the stock issues makeup of judges.
iliketrains76 2 years ago
His 2AR sounds much better than his 1AC. I think he is clearer and using more hand motions than he was to begin with. Still, he is having a hard time looking away from his paper.
LordofSorrow 3 years ago
That guy's eating his fingers!
Someone save him!!
hahahha
when you were talking really fast i thought you were kidding. but yeah, GOOD JOB!!!!!!!
i've never done LD before
but it looks like fun!
xxxLAWRENCExxx 3 years ago
FYI, the Affirmative (Senior, Spencer Harris from Drury University) wins on a 5-0 decision over the Negative (Sophomore, Jessica Furgerson from Western Kentucky University).
Congratulations to both debaters on reaching the finals!
LafayetteForensics 3 years ago
That's important info I should have posted. Thanks for the details, Boyer. Feel like posting a video RFD?
iliketrains76 3 years ago