Added: 1 year ago
From: AidanMonaghan
Views: 11,584
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (42)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • @Hotters5562 what has that got to do with a commercial airliner hitting a building 3 times its size and weight, carrying 11,000 gallons of jet fuel. what you try to insinuate is completely different. from the time the building you mention and the higher earthquake standards to a building built much earlier is comparing water to oil.

  • maybe you have done that in AFTER EFFECTS!!!!!!!!!! GIVE ME THE SOURCE IDIOT!!!!!!

  • Stop allowing yourselves to be swayed by people that hate so much. They would lie about this just to garner attention. Way to many people buy into this BS. As some other near do well comes out with yet another smoking gun picture show saying see see i told you it was an inside job. What happened was so horrible you keep looking for closure. Its not there! We were attacked by muslim extremist. End of story. Bet on with your lives and pray for the fallen. even when Bin Laden said he did it. wow!

  • good job what you are looking at is the failure of the building. these are not explosions the are failure points as the weight of the building starts to crumble. the stress is causing the concrete to pop. its what happens as the weight is shifted from one support column to the next. its physics 101. the truth is hard to take but that's what it is. study structural engineering and you too will see the truth....IT COLLAPSED

  • @proslice56 I understand your point, but I'm not an engineer or architect, then how to explain the explosions in fact, many witnesses heard? It is not me, this I say many people were on the scene, of course, need an excuse to invade other countries and taking over their resources, Osama Bin Laden is a creation of the CIA in its war with the glorious Red Army. -

  • @panarocki i am an engineer and im telling you its not what is portrayed in this vid. i do however know why in 1993 bin laden attacked the trade center and then again in 2001. send me a youtube message and i will take the time to tell you the truth. it will blow your mind. the friggin real problem is the government knew bin laden was hell bent on getting back at the US for betraying him to the Saudis. i have all the names,dates and places.all the truthers want to hear is it was an inside job

  • "Reflection of sunlight" is unsustainable with this video

    Seems to be a big boom

    I'm not a truther but it looks like an explosive, that's all I can say

  • OMFG!!!! greats from the netherlands, i support who believes this!

  • Clearly this is controlled demolition.

  • Jct: Love it. Keep it coming. One of the greatest pretexts for war being exposed only years, rather than decades or centuries, after the fact.

  • I've seen a lot of implosions and don't remember ever seeing a cutter charge go off other than as a special effect for the crowd. This could have been added 'post-production' as it's just a point of white. Hard to say.

    @ anothercountryheard - Most decidedly agreed that Mossad was a huge part of 9/11 (definitely NOT OBL). But I don't discount Bush & Co. The Bush family is too entrenched in both the Middle East and the CIA and has an historical interest in creating a Fascist govt. in the US.

  • 9/11 NOT inside job SEE VIDEO 911 Missing Links It wasn.t Bush & co. and it wasn't Osama. The truth will make you mad.....but once you see the pieces of the puzzle fit together your confusion will end. No 3D holograms, no rockets, no shape shifting reptilian aliens. It's just that everything you see and hear is controlled by ONE GROUP and it's not the Bush administration...

  • Most 911 truthers would be openminded enough to say ok it may be something other than explosives. ALL upholders of the official version will say it has an explanation other than explosives. Why? Either because they allow their beliefs to cloud their judgement, or because they are paid to have that opinion!

  • Can we get the original footage without the cuts?

  • The jetting cloud around that flash rules out a video artifact. Interesting.

  • What the hell is wrong with you people?

    The idea was first that it was explosives that brought the towers down, now we see evidence supporting that claim and all you people say is "meh... computer graphics"

    Wow you're so brainwashed you'll throw away common sense in favour of believing in the official story. Its soooo sad lol. You just dont want to believe the government lied to us. They've done it before and admited it (Gulf of Tonkin), this is no different!

  • you guys are nuts. Spend your energy helping humanity.. not to feed your ego that you are right and everyone else is wrong... you are all utterly crazy and self absorbed.

  • what a surprise 9/11 inside job.

  • Not only flash (followed by others lower down the building, but coupled with debris flying out of the area, obvious damage caused by this single event. This is several of hundreds of such explosions which were happening from nearly the beginning of the "event".

  • Google "9/11 Nukes - Radiation-induced cancers"

  • You know what their going to say, In an age of computer animation, those flashes are just CGI graphics.

  • Uhhh, video artifact repeated for effect.

    Next.

  • well i see 3 flashes - but i also see it "replayed" 3 times.

    Sorry - old news - not bothered

  • very interesting...not sure what to make of that flash...

  • Great job Aidan. Never noticed that before even though I remember seeing this video. Unbelievably clear explosion prior to the collapse.

  • that location on the corner shows up on other shots. very strange happening there.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @FeOKAlSi your comment is quite funny....I never said anything about seeing charges blowing up....I don't suppose your just another shill eh?? I stated that this corner event is clearly visible on many other videos and is actually "old news" for those who have been paying attention for any length of time. I would bet every single video you can find that has that part of the building visible will show the same event. DIfferent angles show interesting things. Do some research and learn more.

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • Comment removed

  • @FeOKAlSi I had posted it but noticed some typos and reposted with corrections. I removed the first post before I left the page. Now neither seems to be present. I took your comment that I had mentioned something was blowing up and I hadn't. Just used to the shills who always make more of what someone says. No problem...misunderstanding. I don't know if you have checked any of my videos but I found something this summer in a small town. You may find it interesting. keep researching!!

  • @rushfan9thcmd Thanks :)

  • There are like 3 flashes after the first one..

  • @zodiacie I noticed that too.

  • @zodiacie Yeah I noticed that and posted about it on a different forum. They happen on the building next to it as if the falling building is cover for explosions to happen on the next building in order to begin weakening it for its eventual collapse.

  • All I have to say about this is Wow. Has AE911 gone over this footage too?

  • @HeinousOne101 I just mailed the link to Richard Gage at his AE 911 truth site

  • ... the evidence for controlled demolition is piling up' :) ...

  • @johnekroll Yeah, it's actually gonna become a problem once the treason trial begins. There will be so much evidence to choose from that we'll have to take time and effort away from a speedy trial for the criminals in order to just sort through the massive pile.

    .

    The death penalty is the sentence for high treason, for those who don't know.

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more