I saw her las night w a great sound man & she nailed it all 3 big songs @ 70 trs old ... . How many chart busters do you expertcritics have ? What you guys going be doin @ 70 ?
If the original release of this song had not been edited, this is almost what it would sound like on record. But, the original recording was too long and had to be edited to a time under 3 minutes back in those day before radio programmers would even give it a listen. Even with that, this classic survived that injustice.
Well her voice and body is no different from all of us as far as going through changes, that natural remember as the song says "everything must change nothing remains the same" , and if you are human thats unavoidable.
I was at this performance. She and other artists sang live but when they produced the entire show they dubbed over the vocals with the studio recordings but only in certain parts if you listen carefully.
lol martha's voice is put on this video take from the original acapella from the studio version you can also hear the vandellas next to her backgroundsingers in the video but the vandellas were not here...
Absolutely not. The vocals, including the back-up singers are prerecorded. The mic is live but Martha is definitely no longer capable of producing the sounds you hear.
She sang the national anthem prior to the Free Press marathon four or five years ago and it was some of the worst singing I've ever heard. It was hard not to feel embarrassed for her. Her voice was not only shot, but it was twisted, mangled and kicked to the curb.
This is the strangest thing to watch. It's a new recording...that sounds like the original...but it has her 60's vocals on the track. She 100% was lip syncing...she does not sound like this anymore, nor will she ever sound like this again. I accept what her voice sounds like now, but this is strange to watch, weird to watch.
It's quite simple, she's lip synching against her original vocal track with live musicians playing the song in the key that it was originally recorded.
You are RIGHT! This is NOT her singing NOW! It's much too much like the OLD Martha. AND I hear Roz in the background, and she clearly is 'NOT' on stage with them either! This is a lip sync! Good to HEAR, tho'.
No. It's a different speed to the original (if sped up from the original it would be higher pitched) and also I doubt the original would be as good quality as what you'd hear these days.
i still love her and this record even if she did lip sync ... what the hell!!?? She was good in her day!! FFs I get annoyed with nit pickers... grrrrr :(
Yah..I remember...she lipsynched this one ...then she sang something live and her voice sounded ...not so good. But God bless her for trying to remind us how truly great she was!
I hate to admit it, but she is definitely lip-synching. Martha does not sound like this anymore ... she has a tremendous vibratto and and has for the past 20+ years. Do youtube search for "Martha Reeves & The Vandellas - Heat wave" and listen to her several years ago ... this is what she sounds like now. They must have lifted a 1960's recording and she is lip-synching for sure.
I think you may be right I had an Old 80s VHS and this is the same audio or realley close to it ,this is how she sounded then. I beleive they took this from an 80s performance and edited it because they did the same thing for Gladys Horton on this same show. but Martha does sound good these current days saw her live in London, the voice is amazing
good song
olddies100 2 weeks ago
I saw her las night w a great sound man & she nailed it all 3 big songs @ 70 trs old ... . How many chart busters do you expertcritics have ? What you guys going be doin @ 70 ?
HighMaintenance2099 1 month ago
If the original release of this song had not been edited, this is almost what it would sound like on record. But, the original recording was too long and had to be edited to a time under 3 minutes back in those day before radio programmers would even give it a listen. Even with that, this classic survived that injustice.
rhtyhmsearch 3 months ago
I saw her in concert last year, she still kinda sounds like what she did on her records
325Chuck355 11 months ago
Well her voice and body is no different from all of us as far as going through changes, that natural remember as the song says "everything must change nothing remains the same" , and if you are human thats unavoidable.
shadhom 1 year ago
I was at this performance. She and other artists sang live but when they produced the entire show they dubbed over the vocals with the studio recordings but only in certain parts if you listen carefully.
behdoc 1 year ago
Was this lip-synched to playback? I watched a similar live performance of this for 2003 and 2008 and her voice is pretty much shot in both.
saturnaspider 2 years ago
lol martha's voice is put on this video take from the original acapella from the studio version you can also hear the vandellas next to her backgroundsingers in the video but the vandellas were not here...
Individuell83 2 years ago
@Individuell83
SaxPlaya4 1 year ago
What show/programme was this from?
FOURTOPS4EVER 2 years ago
I love this song by Martha Reeves! I also love ''Dancing In The Street'' and ''Jimmy Mac'' I love Motown!
greenjennijean 2 years ago
Martha Reeves no longer is anywhere near the vocal talent she was back in the 60s.
That is not a live vocal.
Nice to see though
Naitch1981 2 years ago
wow she is so lip singing,,,,,she sounds much worse now
123soanyway 2 years ago
Absolutely not. The vocals, including the back-up singers are prerecorded. The mic is live but Martha is definitely no longer capable of producing the sounds you hear.
danny1369 2 years ago
She's not singing. They're all lip-syncing!!
danny1369 2 years ago
er...that's a joke, right?!
InglouriousBasterd 2 years ago
She sang the national anthem prior to the Free Press marathon four or five years ago and it was some of the worst singing I've ever heard. It was hard not to feel embarrassed for her. Her voice was not only shot, but it was twisted, mangled and kicked to the curb.
nationalconey 2 years ago
Yeah man she left her figure in the past but here voice is still present, very present!!!
KrazeWorld 3 years ago
She grew bigger, but now I like her voice more than ever.
Great 5
TheEmoyo 3 years ago
A joy to hear her...just a joy...
BrooklynLefferts 3 years ago
This is the strangest thing to watch. It's a new recording...that sounds like the original...but it has her 60's vocals on the track. She 100% was lip syncing...she does not sound like this anymore, nor will she ever sound like this again. I accept what her voice sounds like now, but this is strange to watch, weird to watch.
mhertz25 3 years ago 3
It's quite simple, she's lip synching against her original vocal track with live musicians playing the song in the key that it was originally recorded.
bankman58 3 years ago
The original key is one key higher than what the band is playing...I guess the backup singers couldn't handle the original key.
MusicBlaster08 2 years ago
You are RIGHT! This is NOT her singing NOW! It's much too much like the OLD Martha. AND I hear Roz in the background, and she clearly is 'NOT' on stage with them either! This is a lip sync! Good to HEAR, tho'.
stage7 2 years ago
@mhertz25
No. It's a different speed to the original (if sped up from the original it would be higher pitched) and also I doubt the original would be as good quality as what you'd hear these days.
tolley1466 6 months ago
it's really nice
but sad that it's not the original sound =(
Individuell83 3 years ago
I mean it looks like she sings live
but what's with her voice vibrato? it isn't here
if that was really live it was amazing
Individuell83 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
GOPJ00 3 years ago
i still love her and this record even if she did lip sync ... what the hell!!?? She was good in her day!! FFs I get annoyed with nit pickers... grrrrr :(
lollysoul 3 years ago 17
Yah..I remember...she lipsynched this one ...then she sang something live and her voice sounded ...not so good. But God bless her for trying to remind us how truly great she was!
PetePeterkin 3 years ago 14
love it love it love it, makes me happy for hours!!
lollysoul 3 years ago 8
You are right. The music is slightly different but used the vocals from the actual song.
TonygMus2 3 years ago 8
I hate to admit it, but she is definitely lip-synching. Martha does not sound like this anymore ... she has a tremendous vibratto and and has for the past 20+ years. Do youtube search for "Martha Reeves & The Vandellas - Heat wave" and listen to her several years ago ... this is what she sounds like now. They must have lifted a 1960's recording and she is lip-synching for sure.
mkrobinson95 3 years ago 10
I think you may be right I had an Old 80s VHS and this is the same audio or realley close to it ,this is how she sounded then. I beleive they took this from an 80s performance and edited it because they did the same thing for Gladys Horton on this same show. but Martha does sound good these current days saw her live in London, the voice is amazing
rollsroycecooley1 3 years ago 6
Wow--Martha's voice is rich and soulful! Martha you are brilliant!
jazzamoureux 3 years ago 7
This sounds really good. I am surprised. They always had the energy.
replyform 3 years ago 4
is she really singing live? because her voice sound really Great, almost too good.
kingnando 3 years ago 3
Comment removed
GOPJ00 3 years ago
Yep Martha Reeves Kicks butt !Shawn
tshawn1 3 years ago
I have on tape! I love Martha Reeves!
VonzellSolomon38 4 years ago