Added: 2 years ago
From: kiowa50161
Views: 1,344
Sort by time | Sort by thread (beta)

Link to this comment:

Share to:

All Comments (4)

Sign In or Sign Up now to post a comment!
  • The 2009 is actually better. It doesn't work with the "Loudness War" that much at all. It more accurately fights it. The 1987 has some messed up effects, while the 2009 are more accurate to actual sound. Neither is bad, but its true that the 2009 does not carry the oddity sounds that the 2009 carries.

  • ¿Qué opinan sobre la compresión/limitación/Rango Dinámico etc... "Laodness War?

    Estan los que diecn que se abuso demasiado de estos metodos. Utilizan graficas de los viejos y nuevosa cd´s para probar que se comprimió demasiado el sonido, pero núnca hablan del sonido en si. A mi no me basta estas graficas, lo que importa es el sonido, y los ingenieros a cargo de la remasterización comentan que las usaron pero sin estropear el rango dinámico, a mi me parece que si se respeto. ¿Uds que dicen?

  • What do you think about compression / limiting / Dynamic Range etc ... "Laodness War? There Are those who say that abuse too much of these methods. Graphs using from the old and new cd's to prove that the sound was compressed too, but never talk about the sound itself.

    These graphs are not eough, what matters is the sound, the engineers in charge of the remastering commented that they used it, but without damaging the dynamic range, seems to me that it was respected. What do yuo think about it?

Loading...
Alert icon
0 / 00Unsaved Playlist Return to active list
    1. Your queue is empty. Add videos to your queue using this button:
      or sign in to load a different list.
    Loading...Loading...Saving...
    • Clear all videos from this list
    • Learn more