@rcarter614 First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone h t t p://w w wDOTnewscientistDOTcom/article/dn17060-first-dino-blood-extracted-from-ancient-boneDOThtml A hadrosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells that may help shed light on dinosaur evolution.
@BereanBeacon1 Let me ask you this. Are you saying something on the scale of the Grand Canyon was carved out in a few thousand years? It's just not possible for water to erode miles and miles of solid rock in that time frame. Or are you saying the earth came into existence fully formed? What about continents? Do you not believe they are constantly on the move, and were once part of the supercontinent Pangaea?
@BereanBeacon1 Man, I don't want to look at all that stuff {none of it would change my mind anyway} I was asking for your personal opinion on the above questions.
@rcarter614 try over 40 days, there is much evidence to prove that caves can be made practically over night due to a fast current of water. Whats not to say that the Grand Canyon could not have been made in the same way. They found lime formations that are supposed to take thousands of years yet were formed under a statue that wasn't even build 100 years ago. The ones that got me the most was the petrified hat and sandwich found in a cave. I'm just saying thats all.
@rcarter614 No time to address your questions as many are on the broad way to destruction.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
@rcarter614 not a good case considering in order for carbon dating to be accurate the conditions have to be just right or the test is not valid. It is rare that a sample is not somehow affected by weather including climate and moisture.
Life didn't arise by pure chance so that makes this guy ignorant! Congratulations. Oh and light proves the universe is billions of years old. The idea that light suddenly slowed down a few thousand years ago is laughable and supported by... NOTHING! If that did happen you would be able to SEE it today when looking at distant objects.
@BereanBeacon1 "Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled and their wives ravished" (Isaiah 13:16) and before you dismiss the old testament, "the law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of god is preached, and every man presseth into it. And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail." (St Luke 16:16-17)- Jesus
@metalisdabomb36 If you read the complete context of the OT you may understand what God was about with his people. It has nothing to do with you or anyone else.
If you can't find the love of God here, I will throw out my Bible.
Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
NO you don't get it. we know that the universe is billion's of years old because the universe is expanding and we know about what speed it is expanding at, so we knw when the universe was at a point of singularity
@WAZZA1235 "first life was actually just RNA", WOW, you wouldn't dare use that in a public debate under scientific guidelines.
"universe was at a point of singularity", that's an opinion and not a fact. All evolution is based on science fiction and has nothing to do with real science.
@WAZZA1235 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. Galatians 6:7,8
@BereanBeacon1 What makes your belief anymore real than evolution. Us evolutionists belive in evolution because we can see that evolution is possible and that the world around us backs it up
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
@BereanBeacon1 yes, yes, you've said that to someone else already. That kind of sad, repetetive rhetoric only works on somebody who is afraid of your brutal, sadistic 'God Of Love'.
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. John 3:36
I [Jesus] said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24 It's your choice.
@BereanBeacon1 And the fact that you're so quick and eager to judge others and throw them into your imaginary hell marks you as an evil person yourself.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
Still can't tell the difference between Cosmology and biology. Also depending on Bwden is a serious error as he is an utter incompetent. Radiometric dating is highly accurate, especially potassium/argon and Uranium/lead. Don't forget hte half-life of U238 is 4.5 billion years. Andromeda is a galaxy 2.5million light years away yet it can be seen easily. As we know the speed of light, if the Bowden is right we shouldn't be able to see it for at least another 2.4million years.Yet we can.
Bowden is a complete ass--the speed of light has been measured a great many times...it is a constant. Relativity is accurate (ask the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki if relativity is false. This whole video is worthless. In fact any video containing Bowden or referring to him or Duane Gish and ICR is worthless.
"...pointed out to the evolutionists taht even the 4.5 billion years they claim the earth has existed is still not long enough for evolution to have taken place by chance."
Yep, that's lucky evolution doesn't take place by chance.
Anyway, good old propaganda and rhetorics at work won't make you right.
Is this a joke???? LOL This is the worse creation video I have ever seen. Nice pretend science Did you finish college in 1812?And way to mention scientist but not there names or institutions..Well kinda hard when you are making $hit up I guess...
@fsx23 All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
@BereanBeacon1 REAL science does say you can't evolve from a chicken....... So what is your point again....You are making things up and quote mining.... For example geologist have demonstrated that the magnetic poles switch periodically... But you don't take that position and take selected info from a 1950's report...Than you ignore the analysis of experts in earths magnetic field and blindly accept creationist propaganda. Why are all all your references so old.. And why do you not refer to them
see as uve tryed to use all my words because u are at an end go ahead use other people stuff show ur stupidity show ur arrogance u are only making urslef look stupid think we better wait till ur older and u have some knowledge b4 u really make urself look dumb
@crab0309 All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
@BereanBeacon1 try speaking english i understand u need god to be real cause u fear death when i die i will be happy knowing that i enjoyed a life of truth not a life of fear god is a story told by a very clever man to ease his childrens minds and to keep civillians in line as we live by our laws we evolved and it has been proven why does it say on ur money in god we trust and on the other side have charles darwin he was imprisoned for finding the truth and the churches punished him
@crab0309 but dont get me wrong i am a realist and have been given an extraordinary mind allowing me to see the truth and explain it but i have no reason to change a man who is soul set on his belief i hope u havent missed out on things because of ur beliefs and i truly hope ur right for ur sake and that u gain all u hope for but at least open ur mind first before u close it and understand our sides to
acctually it has been proven that if a creature is placed in the right conditions for aa certian amout of time they will evolve the favour experiment is to take a white moth and place it in a black habitat such as a waste and the moth wil eventually turn black 400 years ago we adverage 5ft as u can tell by the small doors on old houses and dead people byt now we adverage 5 ft 10 a odv increase and blonde hair only came in about 700 years ago oh look 2 evolutions within 1000 years not 1bil
@debra5 ah but u see natural selection is the best survive and evolution is that u must improve wat u got to become stronger and more efficient such as venom and larger teeth we also mess with evolution to make large harmless animals perfect to produce vast quantity's of milk and meat to make the fastest dogs and also with plants to make them grow bigger and faster in harsher conditions making natural selection and evolution 1 in the same
@crab0309 natural selection is the driving force behind evolution, it determines which trait will get passed down to future generations, based on the environment.
evolution is the process that is driven by natural selection and random mutations. through it, populations can change genetically and eventually, they might change into a different species
NEVER EVER will natural selection and evolution be the same thing. its great your no creationist, it sucks that you know so little about evolution
@AllenQuatermain2de u in ur own text point out that for evolution to work natural selection is needed and vice verse acctually implying they are part of the same thing maby u should learn much more before u try and act clever and chosen ur words more wisely. Just because u got taught it in school doesnt mean u know it all try reading books like darwins book where it also says for 1 u need the other making one the same
@AllenQuatermain2de i do not wish to go thro every comment correcting every mistake i make as there is no reason to do so because people can still read it this is not a book i am trying to sell if u want to play it that way after a full stop and the start of a sentence u need a capital letter which u have forgotten to do so in turn meaning u have a weakness in everything u have claimed till now maby u should stop b4 i completely embarrass u
@crab0309 what? not using capitals means that what i claimed is weakened? and you say this in a comment without any capitals? or points? or comma's? or anything!? and you threaten to embarrass ME? really?
@AllenQuatermain2de and to answer ur a and b dilemma because u lack a expanded mind and look upon this with a tunneled vision natural selection works on keeping the skills within the dna lines and in turn adding the mutation of evolution if evolution didnt occur then natural selection would not be needed for evolution to occur natural selection is needed to point it in the right direction natural selection run together 1 in the same ying and yang for 1 u need another the basics to survival learn
@crab0309 insulting me is not answering anything, nice try.
"natural selection works on keeping the skills within the dna lines and in turn adding the mutation of evolution"
what? was that supposed to be English? skills in the DNA "lines"? natural selection adding mutations? look at my other comment, that's what natural selection is, stop making up definitions.
if evolution didn't occur then natural selection wouldn't exist, because natural selection is a part of evolution.
@AllenQuatermain2de as i previously said u lack an open mind and cannot see ur faults ignorance is bliss for some any other person with an ounce of intelligence would learn from others but u can only criticize u are the type of person who belives there right and will start wars and kill people over ur faults and misunderstandings u will become wise with age but until then i recommend u learn wat u can to help not hate
@crab0309 lol do you honestly think throwing around your hatred is going to change the fact that your an idiot? do you honestly think that insulting me counts as evidence or as an argument? you are the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, really, ignorant to the point of complete retardation, as dishonest as any creationist, as hateful as a fundie christian and as arrogant and self-righteous as the pope. its sickening. and all i wanted was to educate you, but your just to dead inside.
@rogan71 no it has not, the only thing that has been observed is variation within the species. At no point has it ever been possible to change one species into another. Dogs have been bred for millennia each time giving rise to different characteristics, but in all this time not once has a single one stopped being a dog. There is no evidence for evolution anywhere, apart from in the minds of paleontologists.
@vicious12394 - paleontologists, zoologists, biologists, geologists and practically every single area of applied science...You are plain wrong. There are many species from amphibians to birds that have identifiably changed species....And a dog is a good example of selective breeding changing a species....A dog is not a wolf!
The ONLY people who deny evolution do it for purely religious reasons. There is no debate. Claiming there is no evidence for evolution is just willful ignorance.
@rogan71 These people have denied evolution for as long as they could and now they have decided that micro evolution exists. They will never accept reality. It's sometimes fun to argue with them, but ultimately fruitless.
WOW, really guys. god is not real. evolution is. Go to SCHOOL!!! the bible is fake, stoping hoping magic god man will save you for ever and get real! you people are nuts. I feel bad for you.
There has been one mathematician who has tried to disprove evolution by maths. William Dembski. He's washed up, and was utterly destroyed not just by the biology community, but by the mathematical community- whose peer-reviewed refutations of his sloppy number work are available for free on the internets.
@MSALLADLACIENCIA not to make this sound like a pantomime, but oh yes it is. If you care so deeply about this idiot that you want me to chase up the refutation again, since the reason I know that such a refutation exists on the internets is that I actually read it, i'll try and chase it up for you.
Ohhh the Ignorance!!! MY BRAIN! The stupidity hurts!!!
Electrical currents? Seriously? Pole reversals are well documented. The magnetic fields will dissapate and simply reverse. "I do not accept these are true reversals - they are rock movements" - So your well documented education leads you to state it as fact?
PROVIDE your references, and then you would be more credible.
Fallacious statements mixed with shear ignorance is what makes these so entertaining.
Like I said, do more of your OWN research. Look at some of the other comments regarding this video. Namely: ThisIsMySockAccount and GabrielGrooveMan.
Check the mathematics on the earth to moon distance. The fact that they were spreading misinformation might lead me to consider you could be doing the same. Imagine a father telling his children, science has the moon in the wrong place based on poor mathematics.
Sorry for getting emotional when people irresponsibly mislead others.
You wrongly accused me of spreading "misinformation" so what did I say that was "wrong"? I asked you to disprove the video, since it should be so easy for an evolutionist to do therefore telling me to do my "own research" is laughable considering I have studied this field for years. So are you going to set the record straight (not hide behind others) and disprove the information or am I justified in appreciating this well informed video?
Why would you consult an evolutionist on the magnetic field of the earth or the mass of the sun? I wouldn't ask a geologist to help me with my ingrown toenail!
Research yourself! But if you want some help: google - 'radiometric dating a christian perspective' (christian perspective...nice touch hey?)
Plenty of time for evolution. Read Dawkins Greatest Show on Earth. Very easy to read.
Are you joking? I just did. At least as much as is possible with 500 characters. How can I possibly fit in all the evidence to refute the video. I gave you a couple of things to think about! Refute in 500 characters? You must be joking.
Then again I guess you think this short video has provided an abundance of irrefutable evidence.
Will keep an open mind but how can this crack pot trump Dawkins and his friends at Oxford, Cambridge, etc. You are on your own.
Geologist went looking for evidence of a flood, but could not find any. They found out the earth was millions of years old. Then nuclear chemists told them the earth was Billions of years old.
There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny !
Refute: prove to be false. Am I going to do this conclusively in 500 characters? Of course not. But I have given you some leads to just some of the mountains of evidence to the contrary. This readily available evidence with go a very long way to refuting the video. I beg you, for some cheap laughs, please ask me again to refute the video. Case/mind closed!
We find evidence of dinosaur evolving for 160 million years, through 3 major time periods, then suddenly, 65 million years ago, they disappeared from the fossil record in the last of 5 mass extinctions.
Look up as much as you can regarding the loss of mass of the sun.......the numbers appear to add up. Good to be a skeptic, but most seem pretty sure re. the H to He, etc figures.
This video is so pathetically dishonest it's hilarious. One form of dating? LOL. Try dozens of different independent forms of dating that all arrive at the same conclusion, that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. And there is NO legitimate scientific debate about it, as much as the deniers would like to pretend otherwise.
Man I love this stuff.. just too funny.. Malcolm Bowden, the Yoda of cognitive dissonance and the laughingstock of Physics.. his attempts to discredit Relativity Theory is some of the funniest nonsense ever penned.. seriously, you're casting your lot with THIS GUY?
I've also found interesting that they claim the moon is aprox. 4 1/4 BILLION yrs old.
The moon is abt. 238,897 miles from Earth. It travels AWAY from the planet at a rate of abt. 1.5 inches per year @ abt. 2,288mph. According to this scientific calculation, the moon was zooming around the planet, inches from the surface only 159,260 yrs ago. Which, of course, is ENTIRELY, ASTRONOMICALLY, PHYSICALLY, & SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE ... but you're not supposed to notice such things, are you?
Also, if time is relative, then it would be no violation for God to accelerate light at the moment of Creation. God made Adam in a mid mature state, why not the rest of the universe.
How could you prove otherwise? And here's the problem for you: Why?
Why would god create it in such a way as to fool anyone looking? Why does god feel the need to deceive the worlds physicists and astronomers? Your hypothesis also doesn't make sense for a lot of other reasons, but it's a bit more than a 500 character comment.
Actually, as its been a while since I've seen the info on it, I needed to look it up again just prior to posting. I'm not a "creation vs. evolutionist" type of person, so I don't keep that stuff handy. SO, it was info that IS current. Thanks for playing, have a nice day.
Truth is, I couldn't care less what you believe. I'm not trying to be cocky here, but seriously, I don't care. I know one thing for sure, anyone who can believe, will believe ... and there WILL BE many who have closed hearts, ears, & eyes. That's just the way it is. I don't argue with those people. There is absolutely no reason to. So with that, I bid you adieu.
This comment has received too many negative votesshow
False; look up lunar tidal locking. The rate the Moon is moving away has sped since its creation during a cataclysmic impact. The data used by YEC's was out of date and incorrect even when it was first proposed in the 80's
Nice to see you keep up with current events.
but you're not supposed to notice such things, are you?
Check your calculations before you perpetuate this stupidity further!
It's about 3.8cm per year. Divide by 100 = 0.038m per year. Divide by 1000 = 0.000038km per year. Now multiply this by 4.5 billion (4500000000) years = 171000km. Considerably less than 380000km.
I notice you have already fooled a number of YouTubers with this error. Please let me know you understand the mathematics and your error. I'll sleep a little better at night. Thanks.
richdorks73 > is that the best you can do ??? LOL...Mathematicians disagree with you !!! But we ALL know 'Evolution' is No 'Science' at ALL but a Bogus Philosophy for the god deniers.
@HalieusOPsuche Not only do mathematicians disagree with me! Also scientists, doctors, physiotherapists, school teachers, epileptics, bricklayers, accountants.......
Obviously the best you can do is not enough. You are losing the battle.
IF you believe this to be true, you have done the research and you think many of us have been deceived, it would be wrong of you not to get this information out. For this you will need to GET HELP.
LOL? no this is not funny. I find you dangerously irresponsible.
Religious people actually sound more convincing when they talk about heaven, hell, repenting, etc than when they try to use science and evidence based arguments.
RD is 99% accurate even with decrease in the speed of light(which didn't happen) the earth is at least 4.54 billion years old.
kyekire 1 month ago
It's one thing to be ignorant, yet another to attempt to force one's ignorance upon others.
Curtis9206 6 months ago
@Curtis9206 That's why Christians want nothing to do with the public schools in America.
7,000 American High School Students Drop Out Every Day: 1 every 26 seconds
h t t p://w w w DOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=lT2R_crAjHg
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
what a retard.. the earth a few thousand years old? what about carbon dating
rcarter614 6 months ago in playlist myStuff
@rcarter614 First dino 'blood' extracted from ancient bone h t t p://w w wDOTnewscientistDOTcom/article/dn17060-first-dino-blood-extracted-from-ancient-boneDOThtml A hadrosaur bone buried for 80 million years has yielded a mix of proteins and microstructures resembling cells that may help shed light on dinosaur evolution.
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 Let me ask you this. Are you saying something on the scale of the Grand Canyon was carved out in a few thousand years? It's just not possible for water to erode miles and miles of solid rock in that time frame. Or are you saying the earth came into existence fully formed? What about continents? Do you not believe they are constantly on the move, and were once part of the supercontinent Pangaea?
rcarter614 6 months ago
@rcarter614 I read an article about tornado shaped water that forms at relativity slow water rates and "plucks" slab of rocks with ease.
Oceans, Creation and the Genesis Flood
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=KWuiNT5SM68
Grand Canyon Debate
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=WVjEOGZEc4A
The Grand Canyon: Evidence for the Flood
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=5aNlb3lFhFM
Global Flood: Evidence for Rocks and Fossils
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=PXH5lwMBNiE
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 Man, I don't want to look at all that stuff {none of it would change my mind anyway} I was asking for your personal opinion on the above questions.
rcarter614 6 months ago
@rcarter614 try over 40 days, there is much evidence to prove that caves can be made practically over night due to a fast current of water. Whats not to say that the Grand Canyon could not have been made in the same way. They found lime formations that are supposed to take thousands of years yet were formed under a statue that wasn't even build 100 years ago. The ones that got me the most was the petrified hat and sandwich found in a cave. I'm just saying thats all.
2ravenf0x2 6 months ago
@rcarter614 No time to address your questions as many are on the broad way to destruction.
For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life. John 3:16
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 6 months ago
@rcarter614 not a good case considering in order for carbon dating to be accurate the conditions have to be just right or the test is not valid. It is rare that a sample is not somehow affected by weather including climate and moisture.
2ravenf0x2 6 months ago
Let's play pretend! Yeah!!!!
Life didn't arise by pure chance so that makes this guy ignorant! Congratulations. Oh and light proves the universe is billions of years old. The idea that light suddenly slowed down a few thousand years ago is laughable and supported by... NOTHING! If that did happen you would be able to SEE it today when looking at distant objects.
sfg911 7 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@sfg911 Thank you.
Find the love of God here.
Audio, Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 sound loving to you?
metalisdabomb36 7 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 "Their children also shall be dashed to pieces before their eyes; their houses shall be spoiled and their wives ravished" (Isaiah 13:16) and before you dismiss the old testament, "the law and the prophets were until John: since that time the kingdom of god is preached, and every man presseth into it. And it is easier for heaven and earth to pass, than one tittle of the law to fail." (St Luke 16:16-17)- Jesus
metalisdabomb36 7 months ago
@metalisdabomb36 If you read the complete context of the OT you may understand what God was about with his people. It has nothing to do with you or anyone else.
If you can't find the love of God here, I will throw out my Bible.
Gospel of John Chapter 1 AV
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=Ao4uaIjd3xs
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
And the first life was actually just RNA in a lipid casing. Unbelievably simple and that is when they evolved to be as complicated as today
WAZZA1235 8 months ago
NO you don't get it. we know that the universe is billion's of years old because the universe is expanding and we know about what speed it is expanding at, so we knw when the universe was at a point of singularity
WAZZA1235 8 months ago
@WAZZA1235 "first life was actually just RNA", WOW, you wouldn't dare use that in a public debate under scientific guidelines.
"universe was at a point of singularity", that's an opinion and not a fact. All evolution is based on science fiction and has nothing to do with real science.
BereanBeacon1 8 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 even though it is used by many biologist that work on fast reproducing organisms. Why do you creationists ignore the evidence
WAZZA1235 8 months ago
@WAZZA1235 Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting. Galatians 6:7,8
BereanBeacon1 8 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 What makes your belief anymore real than evolution. Us evolutionists belive in evolution because we can see that evolution is possible and that the world around us backs it up
WAZZA1235 7 months ago
@WAZZA1235 If you can find an evolutionist to debate your position, you can earn $10,000.
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 I'll give you $50,000 if you can prove gravity. Good luck!
Oh, did I mention you have to prove it to my satisfaction and by my rules?
sfg911 7 months ago
@sfg911 Physicist Questions Gravity's Existence
h t t p://w w wDOTyoutubeDOTcom/watch?v=748IefNsb7o
BereanBeacon1 7 months ago
The Earth is 6000 years old? Bullshit! The Sphynx in Egypt has been proven to be over 8000 years old!
If I was him, I'd go see a doctor about his obvious Althzheimer's condition!
VinnyMonster1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VinnyMonster1 Your time is near.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 yes, yes, you've said that to someone else already. That kind of sad, repetetive rhetoric only works on somebody who is afraid of your brutal, sadistic 'God Of Love'.
VinnyMonster1 9 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@VinnyMonster1 ok, how about these verses.
He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life: and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on him. John 3:36
I [Jesus] said therefore unto you, that ye shall die in your sins: for if ye believe not that I am he, ye shall die in your sins. John 8:24 It's your choice.
BereanBeacon1 9 months ago
@BereanBeacon1 And the fact that you're so quick and eager to judge others and throw them into your imaginary hell marks you as an evil person yourself.
VinnyMonster1 9 months ago
Haha. Its awesome that some people are dumb enough to be fooled by these quacks. Proof that if men are made in god's image, he is an imbecile.
HellspawnICX 10 months ago
This has been flagged as spam show
@HellspawnICX Your time is near.
That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth; And that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father. Philippians 2:10,11
BereanBeacon1 10 months ago
Still can't tell the difference between Cosmology and biology. Also depending on Bwden is a serious error as he is an utter incompetent. Radiometric dating is highly accurate, especially potassium/argon and Uranium/lead. Don't forget hte half-life of U238 is 4.5 billion years. Andromeda is a galaxy 2.5million light years away yet it can be seen easily. As we know the speed of light, if the Bowden is right we shouldn't be able to see it for at least another 2.4million years.Yet we can.
pontecanis 10 months ago
Bowden is a complete ass--the speed of light has been measured a great many times...it is a constant. Relativity is accurate (ask the residents of Hiroshima and Nagasaki if relativity is false. This whole video is worthless. In fact any video containing Bowden or referring to him or Duane Gish and ICR is worthless.
pontecanis 10 months ago
4,545 Million years, + or - 2 million years old.
Pure Chance?
Does a rock fall 'down' by Pure Chance? Evolution is not by pure chance either.
gregrutz 1 year ago
"...pointed out to the evolutionists taht even the 4.5 billion years they claim the earth has existed is still not long enough for evolution to have taken place by chance."
Yep, that's lucky evolution doesn't take place by chance.
Anyway, good old propaganda and rhetorics at work won't make you right.
ivanlagrossemoule 1 year ago
"If the decrease of the speed of light is taken into an account"
PROVE this decrease exists.
kthxbye
alexicoff 1 year ago
Is this a joke???? LOL This is the worse creation video I have ever seen. Nice pretend science Did you finish college in 1812?And way to mention scientist but not there names or institutions..Well kinda hard when you are making $hit up I guess...
fsx23 1 year ago
@fsx23 All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 REAL science does say you can't evolve from a chicken....... So what is your point again....You are making things up and quote mining.... For example geologist have demonstrated that the magnetic poles switch periodically... But you don't take that position and take selected info from a 1950's report...Than you ignore the analysis of experts in earths magnetic field and blindly accept creationist propaganda. Why are all all your references so old.. And why do you not refer to them
fsx23 1 year ago
see as uve tryed to use all my words because u are at an end go ahead use other people stuff show ur stupidity show ur arrogance u are only making urslef look stupid think we better wait till ur older and u have some knowledge b4 u really make urself look dumb
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 All evolutionists have is hot air on the mostly anonymous Internet. We have the real science backed up by the $10,000 Life Science Prize. You can evolve from a chicken and win the prize or make cowardly remarks on websites until you ultimately die and become a creationists after it's too late. My last remark to you is something that everyone understands: CLUCK, CLUCK, CLUCK.
BereanBeacon1 1 year ago
@BereanBeacon1 try speaking english i understand u need god to be real cause u fear death when i die i will be happy knowing that i enjoyed a life of truth not a life of fear god is a story told by a very clever man to ease his childrens minds and to keep civillians in line as we live by our laws we evolved and it has been proven why does it say on ur money in god we trust and on the other side have charles darwin he was imprisoned for finding the truth and the churches punished him
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 but dont get me wrong i am a realist and have been given an extraordinary mind allowing me to see the truth and explain it but i have no reason to change a man who is soul set on his belief i hope u havent missed out on things because of ur beliefs and i truly hope ur right for ur sake and that u gain all u hope for but at least open ur mind first before u close it and understand our sides to
crab0309 1 year ago
acctually it has been proven that if a creature is placed in the right conditions for aa certian amout of time they will evolve the favour experiment is to take a white moth and place it in a black habitat such as a waste and the moth wil eventually turn black 400 years ago we adverage 5ft as u can tell by the small doors on old houses and dead people byt now we adverage 5 ft 10 a odv increase and blonde hair only came in about 700 years ago oh look 2 evolutions within 1000 years not 1bil
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309
but that is natural selection,not evolution
debra5 1 year ago
@debra5 ah but u see natural selection is the best survive and evolution is that u must improve wat u got to become stronger and more efficient such as venom and larger teeth we also mess with evolution to make large harmless animals perfect to produce vast quantity's of milk and meat to make the fastest dogs and also with plants to make them grow bigger and faster in harsher conditions making natural selection and evolution 1 in the same
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 natural selection is the driving force behind evolution, it determines which trait will get passed down to future generations, based on the environment.
evolution is the process that is driven by natural selection and random mutations. through it, populations can change genetically and eventually, they might change into a different species
NEVER EVER will natural selection and evolution be the same thing. its great your no creationist, it sucks that you know so little about evolution
AllenQuatermain2de 1 year ago
@debra5 what do you think natural selection means? and what does evolution mean, according to you?
AllenQuatermain2de 1 year ago
@AllenQuatermain2de u in ur own text point out that for evolution to work natural selection is needed and vice verse acctually implying they are part of the same thing maby u should learn much more before u try and act clever and chosen ur words more wisely. Just because u got taught it in school doesnt mean u know it all try reading books like darwins book where it also says for 1 u need the other making one the same
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 i take it back, its not evolution that you know little about, its language.
"for evolution to work natural selection is needed and vice verse"
LIE! i said NO such thing. evolution is needed for natural selection? that doesn't even make sense!
if you need A for B and B for A, then that means that they are NOT the same thing
"darwins book where it also says for 1 u need the other"
quote needed.
i've never actually met some1 who doesn't know how language works.. it's new for me..
AllenQuatermain2de 1 year ago
@AllenQuatermain2de i do not wish to go thro every comment correcting every mistake i make as there is no reason to do so because people can still read it this is not a book i am trying to sell if u want to play it that way after a full stop and the start of a sentence u need a capital letter which u have forgotten to do so in turn meaning u have a weakness in everything u have claimed till now maby u should stop b4 i completely embarrass u
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 what? not using capitals means that what i claimed is weakened? and you say this in a comment without any capitals? or points? or comma's? or anything!? and you threaten to embarrass ME? really?
AllenQuatermain2de 1 year ago
@AllenQuatermain2de and to answer ur a and b dilemma because u lack a expanded mind and look upon this with a tunneled vision natural selection works on keeping the skills within the dna lines and in turn adding the mutation of evolution if evolution didnt occur then natural selection would not be needed for evolution to occur natural selection is needed to point it in the right direction natural selection run together 1 in the same ying and yang for 1 u need another the basics to survival learn
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 insulting me is not answering anything, nice try.
"natural selection works on keeping the skills within the dna lines and in turn adding the mutation of evolution"
what? was that supposed to be English? skills in the DNA "lines"? natural selection adding mutations? look at my other comment, that's what natural selection is, stop making up definitions.
if evolution didn't occur then natural selection wouldn't exist, because natural selection is a part of evolution.
AllenQuatermain2de 1 year ago
@AllenQuatermain2de as i previously said u lack an open mind and cannot see ur faults ignorance is bliss for some any other person with an ounce of intelligence would learn from others but u can only criticize u are the type of person who belives there right and will start wars and kill people over ur faults and misunderstandings u will become wise with age but until then i recommend u learn wat u can to help not hate
crab0309 1 year ago
@crab0309 lol do you honestly think throwing around your hatred is going to change the fact that your an idiot? do you honestly think that insulting me counts as evidence or as an argument? you are the embodiment of everything wrong with the world, really, ignorant to the point of complete retardation, as dishonest as any creationist, as hateful as a fundie christian and as arrogant and self-righteous as the pope. its sickening. and all i wanted was to educate you, but your just to dead inside.
AllenQuatermain2de 1 year ago
"I do not accept that these are true reversals"
Anything to back up your opinion?
lracuda76 1 year ago
Evolution has been observed happening in a few generations in some species....It has evidence in every living organism...Meaning you fail!
rogan71 1 year ago
@rogan71 no it has not, the only thing that has been observed is variation within the species. At no point has it ever been possible to change one species into another. Dogs have been bred for millennia each time giving rise to different characteristics, but in all this time not once has a single one stopped being a dog. There is no evidence for evolution anywhere, apart from in the minds of paleontologists.
vicious12394 1 year ago
@vicious12394 - paleontologists, zoologists, biologists, geologists and practically every single area of applied science...You are plain wrong. There are many species from amphibians to birds that have identifiably changed species....And a dog is a good example of selective breeding changing a species....A dog is not a wolf!
The ONLY people who deny evolution do it for purely religious reasons. There is no debate. Claiming there is no evidence for evolution is just willful ignorance.
rogan71 1 year ago
@rogan71 These people have denied evolution for as long as they could and now they have decided that micro evolution exists. They will never accept reality. It's sometimes fun to argue with them, but ultimately fruitless.
lracuda76 1 year ago
Then post peer reviewed science to back up your claims...Not your own personal convictions....Utter fail!
rogan71 1 year ago
This has been flagged as spam show
WOW, really guys. god is not real. evolution is. Go to SCHOOL!!! the bible is fake, stoping hoping magic god man will save you for ever and get real! you people are nuts. I feel bad for you.
coilinreltub 2 years ago
There has been one mathematician who has tried to disprove evolution by maths. William Dembski. He's washed up, and was utterly destroyed not just by the biology community, but by the mathematical community- whose peer-reviewed refutations of his sloppy number work are available for free on the internets.
bobisterbezreal 2 years ago
@bobisterbezreal that´s just not true
MSALLADLACIENCIA 1 year ago
@MSALLADLACIENCIA not to make this sound like a pantomime, but oh yes it is. If you care so deeply about this idiot that you want me to chase up the refutation again, since the reason I know that such a refutation exists on the internets is that I actually read it, i'll try and chase it up for you.
bobisterbezreal 1 year ago
@bobisterbezreal Ok. I would like to read it too then, so that I can make my own opinion based on critics from both sides, not only one.
MSALLADLACIENCIA 1 year ago
wonderful
jocko500 2 years ago
Evolution does not say how old the earth is. Geologist say the earth is millions of years old. Nuclear chemists say it is billions of years old.
The magnetic field has 'flipped' many times.
Evolution is not chance.
gregrutz 2 years ago 2
What the fuck is an evolutionist?
Geologist study the rocks, dummies.
Creationist have a million things they don't understand but can't come up with one good thing that disproves evolution.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Nothing does not create everything.
phoenician7 2 years ago
creationist say 'poof' nothing to everything, not science.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Ohhh the Ignorance!!! MY BRAIN! The stupidity hurts!!!
Electrical currents? Seriously? Pole reversals are well documented. The magnetic fields will dissapate and simply reverse. "I do not accept these are true reversals - they are rock movements" - So your well documented education leads you to state it as fact?
PROVIDE your references, and then you would be more credible.
Fallacious statements mixed with shear ignorance is what makes these so entertaining.
bailesie 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
hahahahahahah
hahahaha
this guy is fucking dumb
333333344444 2 years ago
Thanks for producing this video. I enjoyed it. Please make more as it is a real eye opener. Evolutionists dont want us to know these things.
phoenician7 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
@phoenician - Just like mathematicians don't want us to know 2 + 2 is 5.
Please do a lot more of your own research before you gleefully spread this misinformation.
richdorks73 2 years ago
Id really like to see you disprove the information presented in the video before you start with your emotional rhetoric and personal attacks.
phoenician7 2 years ago
Like I said, do more of your OWN research. Look at some of the other comments regarding this video. Namely: ThisIsMySockAccount and GabrielGrooveMan.
Check the mathematics on the earth to moon distance. The fact that they were spreading misinformation might lead me to consider you could be doing the same. Imagine a father telling his children, science has the moon in the wrong place based on poor mathematics.
Sorry for getting emotional when people irresponsibly mislead others.
richdorks73 2 years ago
You wrongly accused me of spreading "misinformation" so what did I say that was "wrong"? I asked you to disprove the video, since it should be so easy for an evolutionist to do therefore telling me to do my "own research" is laughable considering I have studied this field for years. So are you going to set the record straight (not hide behind others) and disprove the information or am I justified in appreciating this well informed video?
phoenician7 2 years ago
Why would you consult an evolutionist on the magnetic field of the earth or the mass of the sun? I wouldn't ask a geologist to help me with my ingrown toenail!
Research yourself! But if you want some help: google - 'radiometric dating a christian perspective' (christian perspective...nice touch hey?)
Plenty of time for evolution. Read Dawkins Greatest Show on Earth. Very easy to read.
richdorks73 2 years ago
So you're not going to refute the video are you? I didnt think so. You do not have any substantiation for your "arguments".
phoenician7 2 years ago
Are you joking? I just did. At least as much as is possible with 500 characters. How can I possibly fit in all the evidence to refute the video. I gave you a couple of things to think about! Refute in 500 characters? You must be joking.
Then again I guess you think this short video has provided an abundance of irrefutable evidence.
Will keep an open mind but how can this crack pot trump Dawkins and his friends at Oxford, Cambridge, etc. You are on your own.
richdorks73 2 years ago
Nope. I asked you if you're going to insult the video then you should be prepaired to refute it and not hide behind someone elses words.
You wont refute it because you cant.
Case closed.
phoenician7 2 years ago
Geologist went looking for evidence of a flood, but could not find any. They found out the earth was millions of years old. Then nuclear chemists told them the earth was Billions of years old.
gregrutz 2 years ago 2
There are over 250,000 peer-reviewed studies on evolution, with full support from every related life science, including genetics. There has not been a single falsification to refute evolution in 150 years of relentless scrutiny !
gregrutz 2 years ago
Refute: prove to be false. Am I going to do this conclusively in 500 characters? Of course not. But I have given you some leads to just some of the mountains of evidence to the contrary. This readily available evidence with go a very long way to refuting the video. I beg you, for some cheap laughs, please ask me again to refute the video. Case/mind closed!
richdorks73 2 years ago
You keep hiding behind other peoples words and make excuses to not refute the video.
You wont because you cant.
NEXT!
phoenician7 2 years ago
The video is full of crap !!
gregrutz 2 years ago
@phoenician7 And you hide behind the false words of some long dead priests and mysics who concocted the old and the new testaments.
VinnyMonster1 9 months ago
We find evidence of dinosaur evolving for 160 million years, through 3 major time periods, then suddenly, 65 million years ago, they disappeared from the fossil record in the last of 5 mass extinctions.
gregrutz 2 years ago
Look up as much as you can regarding the loss of mass of the sun.......the numbers appear to add up. Good to be a skeptic, but most seem pretty sure re. the H to He, etc figures.
Good luck!
richdorks73 2 years ago
The sun loses 4 million tons a second and has for millions of years, so what?
gregrutz 2 years ago
Do you agree ThisIsMySockAccount has misplaced the moon?
I am happy to read any other comments you have - along with the answer to this question!
richdorks73 2 years ago
This video is so pathetically dishonest it's hilarious. One form of dating? LOL. Try dozens of different independent forms of dating that all arrive at the same conclusion, that the Earth is 4.5 billion years old. And there is NO legitimate scientific debate about it, as much as the deniers would like to pretend otherwise.
dangeroustalk net/a-team/Earth_Age
dangeroustalk net/a-team/evolution
dangeroustalk net/a-team/Intelligent_Design
mjr256 2 years ago
Man I love this stuff.. just too funny.. Malcolm Bowden, the Yoda of cognitive dissonance and the laughingstock of Physics.. his attempts to discredit Relativity Theory is some of the funniest nonsense ever penned.. seriously, you're casting your lot with THIS GUY?
SofaKingLoaded 2 years ago
Why would god put all this evidence out for people to discover?
freakincampers 2 years ago
I've also found interesting that they claim the moon is aprox. 4 1/4 BILLION yrs old.
The moon is abt. 238,897 miles from Earth. It travels AWAY from the planet at a rate of abt. 1.5 inches per year @ abt. 2,288mph. According to this scientific calculation, the moon was zooming around the planet, inches from the surface only 159,260 yrs ago. Which, of course, is ENTIRELY, ASTRONOMICALLY, PHYSICALLY, & SCIENTIFICALLY IMPOSSIBLE ... but you're not supposed to notice such things, are you?
ThisIsMySockAccount 2 years ago
I love that fact as well.
Also, if time is relative, then it would be no violation for God to accelerate light at the moment of Creation. God made Adam in a mid mature state, why not the rest of the universe.
GabrielGroverMan 2 years ago
Exactly, but notice that the "fact demanding evolutionists" (lol) love to thumbs down fact based comments. "Hide the evidence much?" lol
ThisIsMySockAccount 2 years ago
How could you prove otherwise? And here's the problem for you: Why?
Why would god create it in such a way as to fool anyone looking? Why does god feel the need to deceive the worlds physicists and astronomers? Your hypothesis also doesn't make sense for a lot of other reasons, but it's a bit more than a 500 character comment.
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
Actually, as its been a while since I've seen the info on it, I needed to look it up again just prior to posting. I'm not a "creation vs. evolutionist" type of person, so I don't keep that stuff handy. SO, it was info that IS current. Thanks for playing, have a nice day.
ThisIsMySockAccount 2 years ago
Truth is, I couldn't care less what you believe. I'm not trying to be cocky here, but seriously, I don't care. I know one thing for sure, anyone who can believe, will believe ... and there WILL BE many who have closed hearts, ears, & eyes. That's just the way it is. I don't argue with those people. There is absolutely no reason to. So with that, I bid you adieu.
ThisIsMySockAccount 2 years ago
This comment has received too many negative votes show
False; look up lunar tidal locking. The rate the Moon is moving away has sped since its creation during a cataclysmic impact. The data used by YEC's was out of date and incorrect even when it was first proposed in the 80's
Nice to see you keep up with current events.
but you're not supposed to notice such things, are you?
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
@ThisIsMySockAccount you're doing it wrong. Do the math again.
TheLittleDonkey 2 years ago
@ThisIMySockAccount
Check your calculations before you perpetuate this stupidity further!
It's about 3.8cm per year. Divide by 100 = 0.038m per year. Divide by 1000 = 0.000038km per year. Now multiply this by 4.5 billion (4500000000) years = 171000km. Considerably less than 380000km.
I notice you have already fooled a number of YouTubers with this error. Please let me know you understand the mathematics and your error. I'll sleep a little better at night. Thanks.
richdorks73 2 years ago
great post....thanks
darpachief 2 years ago 2
Get help!
richdorks73 2 years ago
You have evadence that shows this to be wrong?
hellavadeal 2 years ago
richdorks73 > is that the best you can do ??? LOL...Mathematicians disagree with you !!! But we ALL know 'Evolution' is No 'Science' at ALL but a Bogus Philosophy for the god deniers.
HalieusOPsuche 2 years ago
Tell that to all the Christians out there that have no problems with evolution. Oops, where did your argument go?
ScottishAtheist 2 years ago
ScottishAtheist - No born-again christian believes in the God denying philosophy of 'Evolution'.
many people are 'christian' in name Only, NOT Born-Again. The Only True Christian is a 'Born-Again" christian as Jesus Christ Himself stated.
Why does Hollywood & the music Industry Embrace & Promote Luciferianism / Satanism ?
Just Coincidence ? Just a bit of fun for them ?
NO, there's a Lying spirit that deceives & guides these people to Deceive the Whole World.
Consistent with bible
HalieusOPsuche 2 years ago 2
@HalieusOPsuche Not only do mathematicians disagree with me! Also scientists, doctors, physiotherapists, school teachers, epileptics, bricklayers, accountants.......
Obviously the best you can do is not enough. You are losing the battle.
IF you believe this to be true, you have done the research and you think many of us have been deceived, it would be wrong of you not to get this information out. For this you will need to GET HELP.
LOL? no this is not funny. I find you dangerously irresponsible.
richdorks73 2 years ago
richdorks73 > you don't know what a battle is my friend.
death comes to all men....for you soul, that's a battle.
heaven or hell.
Repent or Perish.
You 'little' earthly debates will perish with you.
HalieusOPsuche 2 years ago
@HalieusOPsuche
That's more like it!
Religious people actually sound more convincing when they talk about heaven, hell, repenting, etc than when they try to use science and evidence based arguments.
richdorks73 2 years ago
richdorks73 > i've noticed you've not been able to refute this video,....hence, making a mockery of your contention with it....lol
HalieusOPsuche 2 years ago