CHALAN Kanoa. CHALAN, auuughh!!! NOT CHARAN. (Sigh)....."Chalan" means Road. There's no such thing as "CHARAN".....Nevertheless, this doc is mesmerizing, and thanks for posting it.
IJA Tanks we designed for Infantry support (like the Brits and French), which is a good tactic when up against a Infantry based army like much of the Chinese in China from 1937-1945. However, some IJA tanks could infact handle small arms fire to a certain degree. In all militarys, Japanese, and all around, there was a quality control, and certain aspects of edicts the IJA would follow. Such as... INFANTRY BASED TACTICS. Thus, they were Infantry support primarily.
the marines so nub, as if u wudnt just use ur battlecruisers to lay waste to the shores first and then land the marines after the japs fall back further inland gees
U.S.M.C. landed and delivered at Guadalcanal, and (whether you like it or not) the Jap's would have taken over your country if it wasn't for American Marines, so show some respect!
This set of video collections from the History Channel are very interesting and well worth the time to watch them. Some of the explanations are EXCELLENT!
CHALAN Kanoa. CHALAN, auuughh!!! NOT CHARAN. (Sigh)....."Chalan" means Road. There's no such thing as "CHARAN".....Nevertheless, this doc is mesmerizing, and thanks for posting it.
mele1mele 5 months ago
The japanese tanks were outdated by this time. Can solely be considered mobile infantry support. Keep them camouflaged and in the background.
askjiir 1 year ago
seriously japanese armored blitz r shitty compared to german armored blitz...
Thanato1815 1 year ago
why do japs wear white gloves? it's a bit weird
jomardomingo77 1 year ago
@jomardomingo77
It's because they liked Mickey Mouse ;)
PoppingSanta 1 year ago
@PoppingSanta lol
jomardomingo77 1 year ago
Its pronounced, :LAYTEH:
thadus232 2 years ago
IJA Tanks we designed for Infantry support (like the Brits and French), which is a good tactic when up against a Infantry based army like much of the Chinese in China from 1937-1945. However, some IJA tanks could infact handle small arms fire to a certain degree. In all militarys, Japanese, and all around, there was a quality control, and certain aspects of edicts the IJA would follow. Such as... INFANTRY BASED TACTICS. Thus, they were Infantry support primarily.
drewthefan123 2 years ago
the marines so nub, as if u wudnt just use ur battlecruisers to lay waste to the shores first and then land the marines after the japs fall back further inland gees
nsta555 2 years ago
are you really stupid!...get your facts straight before you start dissing my CORPS..
they said it them selves that they were dug into caves...
Semper Fi!.
3S3BLACKY 2 years ago
@nsta555
U.S.M.C. landed and delivered at Guadalcanal, and (whether you like it or not) the Jap's would have taken over your country if it wasn't for American Marines, so show some respect!
jakebroadway 1 year ago
japanese were more of shipbuilding and aircraft developers than tanks
tak0242424 2 years ago
lol, I actually do think that most of their tanks actually could withstand .30 bullets.
perhaps not the fifty cal though... xD
steelpanther88 2 years ago 2
i think he's talking about .30 tank rounds...
numso 2 years ago
The Japanese tanks were more like fuel cans on tracks, some of them couldn't even withstand a .30 round at point blank range.
HaNsWiDjAjA 2 years ago
their tanks are really very lousy unlike the german panzer
stanislaw84 2 years ago 4
No, they could withstand machine guns, but not 20mm
jakefree25 2 years ago
I say some of their tanks, not all of them are that weak.
HaNsWiDjAjA 2 years ago
esto no se compara a como se muestra en la pelicula "Codigos de guerra"
Remagenbrid 2 years ago
Why is the night of day 1 skipped?
Wimpielef 3 years ago
This set of video collections from the History Channel are very interesting and well worth the time to watch them. Some of the explanations are EXCELLENT!
RetroRadios
RetroRadios 3 years ago 6
amd the sun will set 4 u and the shadow of the day llalal
nicholasbang 3 years ago