Great commentary, I like how you explained so many moves and why some other moves that might have been played would have been bad or just something different.
Great job dear Jerry but one advice I made, you ignored it.. I asked you to make the pieces moves more visible and obvious because half of the time and attention we spend in back and forward to see what was the move that was played.. the pieces move in light speed.. You could enlight the piece that is going to move and then catch it and move it slowly to let us see the move.. Anyway thanks again, you are our teacher with your nice and elegant voice..
@14.03 hypothetical scenario black pushes a7- c6 wins knight... also back knight to d4 @14. 18 allows white to play knight to d5 leaving black queen stuck f7/ f8
That was some thorough commentary. Ever think of doing commentary on openings? These thoroughness could be good in explaining things to look for in openings, why the main line was the considered the "main line", etc.
"The tactician knows what to do when there is something to do; whereas the strategian knows what to do when there is nothing to do." ~Gerald Abrahams~
By mentioning blacks f5 push and focusing on the rook protecting f6, you forgot to mention that playing f5 also stops any e4/Ne4's(and white's last move was Nc3 so yeah, it seems logical that he wants to stop that too, or even the main priority/motive behind f5, while the rook protecting f6 is an 'auxiliary' benefit, it takes advantage of the half open file if e4 is indeed played).
But yeah. You do an excellent job with your analysis, and you are up to date with the tournaments etc. Thanks man.
Hey Jerry, I was already writing some coverage of todays game before you released this (great job btw). This will be in my article tomm:
"Radjabov played a double-fianchetto opening as white against Jakovenko, and I was disappointed with the lack of aggression in Jakovenko's response. Radjabov achieved a pressure after a tense middlegame struggle and went on to win thanks to a few nice tactical shots."
Thank you again Jerry for another easy to follow chess commentary. With your help I am able to appreciate every move of chess match I wouldn't otherwise be able to enjoy. 21 minutes well spent :)
@Nidhogg Shut up, you're the sore loser, you know very well I am joking...if you take it seriously you're a serious moron who needs to go to school. So yeah, you're dumb, kid.
Great commentary, I like how you explained so many moves and why some other moves that might have been played would have been bad or just something different.
MrRyanholder 2 months ago
Great job dear Jerry but one advice I made, you ignored it.. I asked you to make the pieces moves more visible and obvious because half of the time and attention we spend in back and forward to see what was the move that was played.. the pieces move in light speed.. You could enlight the piece that is going to move and then catch it and move it slowly to let us see the move.. Anyway thanks again, you are our teacher with your nice and elegant voice..
Nasos228 3 months ago
Jerry , at 12:43 white can get out of the fork with knight d5 cause the black queen is unprotected.
PeterPunkBoy 5 months ago
@PeterPunkBoy After Qf7 it's a similar scenario...knight...queen still hit.
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
@14.03 hypothetical scenario black pushes a7- c6 wins knight... also back knight to d4 @14. 18 allows white to play knight to d5 leaving black queen stuck f7/ f8
jafarkazmi100 5 months ago
@14.03 hypothetical scenario black pushes a7- c6 wins knight...
jafarkazmi100 5 months ago
12:30 black wants to control e5 against Q's move to there. also save to his Q against white; Nd5.
erol973 5 months ago
great commentary and games, love your channel!
yomammaspoodle 5 months ago
@yomammaspoodle Thanks.
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
9:15 you said Bh3, maybe Jakovenko was worried about the c3 knight going to d2 then f2 to trap the black bishop.
lastwarrior2004 5 months ago
@lastwarrior2004 d1-f2*
lastwarrior2004 5 months ago
16:48 the other reason not to play pawn takes pawn is bishop takes knight and queen forks the king and rook
lastwarrior2004 5 months ago
at 13:00 after ND4 white can play ND5 winning a pawn?
alexandre312993 5 months ago
Hey Jerry I saw a nice move at 12:22.
Bxc6,Vxc6 Nd5
MrPeto1212 5 months ago
Comment removed
archersbane 5 months ago
In the variation you discuss at 13:46, while the white knight is on b5, doesn't ...a6 from black trap the knight?
mraxeguy 5 months ago
That was some thorough commentary. Ever think of doing commentary on openings? These thoroughness could be good in explaining things to look for in openings, why the main line was the considered the "main line", etc.
xdragon2k 5 months ago 2
@xdragon2k Thank you. :)
ChessNetwork 5 months ago
Freaking awesome!
freakkit 5 months ago
Very enlightening description
nidusmasnidusmas 5 months ago
-fian cheeto!(spelling )
guitarfella581 6 months ago
Thanks for the video. Well done
dumpnchase 6 months ago
Keep up the good work Jerry
oldhamer111 6 months ago
As always I got something out of it. Thanks
TheHuginMunin 6 months ago
great
shorty4tube 6 months ago
I would not of allowed the pass pawn from black but that's why I suck at chess :) very clear presentation ,thank you .
sausage4mash 6 months ago
As always, first rate coverage. Your explainations are crystal clear. Thanks for all your excellent videos, they are really appreciated.
BasicPawn 6 months ago
Hey Jerry, what about 20:03 c2. Cant find a real way to prevent black from queening.
l3loodHunter 6 months ago
@l3loodHunter if c2, then:
... Rh7+
Kg8 Rfg7+
Kf8 Rc7 holds
c1=Q is met with Rh8#
asdfasdf8525 6 months ago
@l3loodHunter lol you are right but then it will be check mate for black..
fffffvegita8 6 months ago
@fffffvegita8 i mean 20:03
- | c2
Rh7+ | Kg8
Rfg7+| Kf8
and then?
Rc7?| c1Queening < The Queen is saving the King from Checkmate, if Rxc8+, Queen just recaptures or if he takes Queen then white simply lost a rock
Cant see a solution
l3loodHunter 6 months ago
Wow, so many Jerry videos lately... I don't know what to say I'm so happy!
sexySBH 6 months ago
Very nice strategic insight. Thanks very much for the analysis - great job!
JoshWiniberg 6 months ago
"The tactician knows what to do when there is something to do; whereas the strategian knows what to do when there is nothing to do." ~Gerald Abrahams~
bagsic3100 6 months ago 11
@bagsic3100 Lol, I'm going to rember that, now.
lukeanatr 6 months ago
Amazing analysis Jerry, thanks so much for the video. Two in one day - how lucky are we!!!!
luuminaire 6 months ago
By mentioning blacks f5 push and focusing on the rook protecting f6, you forgot to mention that playing f5 also stops any e4/Ne4's(and white's last move was Nc3 so yeah, it seems logical that he wants to stop that too, or even the main priority/motive behind f5, while the rook protecting f6 is an 'auxiliary' benefit, it takes advantage of the half open file if e4 is indeed played).
But yeah. You do an excellent job with your analysis, and you are up to date with the tournaments etc. Thanks man.
ex0duzz 6 months ago
Interesting till the end '-'
rikkou1509 6 months ago
From the perspective of this very casual player you do an excellent job explaining the thinking and tactics. Thank you.
Greatbloke 6 months ago
Even at the very last minutes,traps were still everywhere,gosh totally mental torturing!! LOL
gymproace1 6 months ago
smooth analysis
AlanWattParrot 6 months ago
wonderful video. Great commentary on controlling squares.
Thanks!
wclipson 6 months ago
great job
ThirstyJuicebox2 6 months ago
really
nice
analysis
xmikedavis 6 months ago
Thank you!!!!
Carlisle412 6 months ago
Hey Jerry, I was already writing some coverage of todays game before you released this (great job btw). This will be in my article tomm:
"Radjabov played a double-fianchetto opening as white against Jakovenko, and I was disappointed with the lack of aggression in Jakovenko's response. Radjabov achieved a pressure after a tense middlegame struggle and went on to win thanks to a few nice tactical shots."
OnlineChessLessons 6 months ago 13
At 20:17, what was the point of trading rooks like that? Couldnt white have simply attacked the rook watching over the promotion pawn?
kupo150 6 months ago
That was an awesome analysis! I would love to hear more from ChessNetwork!
ZestyBuilder 6 months ago
cheers for the code. your a star....
TheEnglishEducator 6 months ago
At 5:10, why the bishop don't capture the knight at c6. After the queen takes, the white knight on b5 can fork the queen and the rook.
skydragon207 6 months ago
@skydragon207 The queen doesn't take, it's the rook that takes the bishop and he's left with a massive light square weakness around his king! :)
baronvictor 6 months ago
@baronvictor Thanks for the answer.
skydragon207 6 months ago
GG
DextrosJ 6 months ago
that was an excellent game
AndyMH182 6 months ago
jerry why dont you have ads??
clintbreed 6 months ago
BEWARE, BITCHES ARGUING OVER FIRST COMMENT BELOW
clintbreed 6 months ago
Thank you again Jerry for another easy to follow chess commentary. With your help I am able to appreciate every move of chess match I wouldn't otherwise be able to enjoy. 21 minutes well spent :)
oddball7342 6 months ago
nice analysis
mamado226 6 months ago
hahahahaha
justsshitsandgiggles 6 months ago
first!
nicocola1 6 months ago
@nicocola1 Great job, loser.
Nidhogg 6 months ago
@Nidhogg shut up you a??hole
chessbeast101 6 months ago
@Nidhogg Shut up, you're the sore loser, you know very well I am joking...if you take it seriously you're a serious moron who needs to go to school. So yeah, you're dumb, kid.
nicocola1 6 months ago
@nicocola1 What was the joke?
Nidhogg 6 months ago