The poor stay poor and supressed and depressed, while the big banks, and big money interests of America get TAX PAYER bail out money and richer. This country is completely backwards and the more time that goes on, the sicker I get of the way things are becoming.
Where is the local leadership on this and other issues? They were not mentioned in this and that seems to be a fundamental part of this video. Otherwise, it loses some credibility. I am not condoning this but the leadership was not included.
Sir, my heart goes out to you and your people,The poor ,elderly,the sick are under attack.The gov.t gives billions to banks and the poor must freeze and die. I would like to post some of your videos on my channel to help you spread the message . This is inhumane for this to be tolerated. You are in my prayers.
Also, my Mom worked at a resturant and the restaurant tried to donate several TONS--literally--of food, but the homeless shelter rejected it because it wasn't completely fresh!
I guess they were starving, but not starving ENOUGH?
When did the "poor" get so haughty that hand-me-downs aren't good enough for them?
I would blame Obama and his handouts for engendering this sense of mega-entitlement, but this happened even BEFORE Obama's reign!
Well, the E-Waste is because people want to get rid of the old computers and toys. I actually donated a whole computer to a homeless shelter, and they started bitching that it wasn't a brand new model. I'm sorry, maybe the OTHER benefactor(s) who give them a free computer would give them a top-of-the-line one!
Perhaps due to their ingratitude, noone else gave them a new computer. And I was dis-inclined to repeat that particular mistake!
There are even some who say recycling ITSELF is a waste, because you spend more energy getting something useful out of trash than you do mining anew--and of course, you need to be more careful when melting down multiple substances with varying melting/evaporation points.
I haven't heard much new on the nanotech front, and people are kind of scared of tech in America, whether from cost or from action movies from Terminator on down giving it a bad name...
Machines are just high-speed reflections of ourselves.
We rely on the machines for a comfortable living--and in some cases to live at all!
Not just the obvious of hospital machines, but more subtle dependency like tractors. 70% of America's oil goes to farms, rather than cars, makeup, or even plastics! (Despite the b(r)est efforts of Hollywood bimbos)
If we cut back on the farming, more people will starve.
Also, plastics could make settling the ocean floor a temporary solution...
Actually, as much as I hate to admit it, you may be right...But most Americans don't TRY to suck the life out of the land, we try to get by as best we can.
Much as I'm sure others don't TRY to compete with Americans, it's just the "nature of the game".
I'm a technocrat, though, which means I believe technology is the solution.
And if you take it more literally, technocrat means technology in charge, which is NOT a bad thing, certain action-movies aside!
Yes, they're paid to stay poor--and to keep breeding, which makes MORE poor people, so those of us who "can afford to" pay, will have to pay MORE to keep them all alive!
It's literally rewarding a BAD thing.
You do not make progress by handouts and welfare. Not only is this degrading, but it also makes them welfare-dependent instead of self sufficient and autonomous.
Unless that's the idea? Make everyone government-dependent serfs?
Technology doesn't always ruin the natural world, BUT it's more expensive to make it clean, so if one country passes laws to force them to clean up their act, they'll just move to another country without such annoying restrictions, and That Country will call us chumps for caring about the planet rather than maximizing profits.
In 1938 there were slightly less than 2-billion people on this planet. We are now pushing 7-billion, and everything from genius, to intoxicating cleavage is reduced to commodities. They want what We've got, and there's always someone willing to sell it to them--even if they They can't afford it!
Why do they get to play the leech and simply laze around, sucking the life from a superior organism while that organism must work harder and harder to maintain itself?
Of course, that accusation should also go to the rich who are being "generous" with the "unlimited" funds of the taxpayers, but the poor ARE being opportunistic, and "advocacy" groups have fought any attempt to reduce or eliminate welfare.
Obama ALSO ended the Welfare to Work proviso, so Welfare-leeches can leech for LIFE now!
Actually, that's EXACTLY how I described it on another thread: The fact that taxes pay welfare literally makes us slaves to the "poor" who choose to STAY poor.
I know that sounds backward, but think about it: IF you are working longer and harder and seeing no extra benefits from it, BUT the other party is benefiting from YOUR work, then you are their slave, de facto, if not de juro!
Also, our local utilities co. has tacked on a surcharge to people who don't use ENOUGH utilities, claiming it's to help pay for poor people who can't afford their utilities. This seems dubious, because it's an INVOLUNTARY surcharge, and not attached to the people who use TOO MUCH, it's attached to the people who don't use enough!
More importantly, if it was meant for the poor, they could make it voluntary, like the shamrocks or "Round Up for the Hungry", etc.
And moreover, why bail them out at all, rather than let Darwin's Will Be Done? That was part of the allure of deregulation: Successful entities would BUYOUT--not BAIL out--unsuccessful entities. Bailouts simply reward incompetence--and look what they did with the money afterward. Other than the lavish parties, a lot went to bonuses of the people who made stupid policy mistakes in the first place!
Actually, Clinton forced banks to make loans to minorities who couldn't afford it, labeling their past payment delinquency a "racial trait". It was legally considered "discrimination" then, NOT to loan to people who wouldn't pay it back. So it came as no surprise that welshers welshed on their debts.
But Bush didn't bail them out, Obama did. Bush has been pegged as an idiot, albeit a straightforward idiot, so do you really think he delayed bailing them out to lay the blame on Obama?
While we could argue the merits and demerits of kicking people off land to create a country on it, let's focus on the present. We're ALL addicted to the technology that keeps us alive, but its administrators are now jacking up the prices and essentially, the system that sustains us is slowly killing us.
Whether we blame Obama or not, what can we do about it?
Those lands are now States with other people living on them. How would you justify kicking them off their land to give "yours" back?
America DOES seem to be going from Land of the Free to Land of the Handouts/Bailouts. It is for good reason that Obama is nicknamed the Handout President!
The Reservation is a semi-sovereign state, separate from, but existing within, and subsidized by, America!
As to "free country", that might be the problem: Mistranslation. FreeDOM is NOT the same as FREEBIES!
Yes, this is the melting pot, but SOME do not want to melt and join in, they want to keep their lesser culture separate, AND get the benefits of American tech!
Yes, we get illegals from elsewhere, but fewer and lower-profile! The first part of being illegal is being undetected!
it is just a way to keep our people down, live in the city, my last entire bill was $119.29, that's for lights, water, trash and garbage pick up. On my bill it says if I don't pay and my services are shut off, I will have to pay $ 181.01. to get it reconnected, so who can these people on the rez where the power is produced being paying so much more than I do?
Actually, from what I've been reading lately, a tribe in South Dakota sued Mount Rushmore out of the hands of the Government, but failed to pay taxes on it, so the IRS owns it now.
They are NOT part of the Government, they're a private Corporation empowered to act on behalf of the Government.
Americans are selling out--figuratively and literally--to foreign powers, so yes, your idea that Indians would sell their land out is probably true.
@Nikkafan Some promise! One day the governments will crumble like a house of cards. The continuation of the poplulation of humans in an uncaring, helpless way makes no sense. Maybe going back to living in smaller houses heated by wood fire is the way. But without money, that's not possible either. Something has to give, but why is it always the ones at the end of the line that give; and not the ones at the top of the ladder?
The end-user always pays for it! Taxes pay for welfare and foreign aid--Easy to be generous with other peoples' money!
As to log-cabins, do you have any idea how much of the population would have to be "reduced" (Or whatever euphemism you choose) to allow everyone to live in their own houses, rather than Heavy Residential structures?
And where would we put the outcast of other countries who keep coming here, seeking a better life at taxpayer expense?
@EPGAH What you are pointing out here is a very big issue, and I agree. What happens will happen obviously. The world can not sustain a population this large and exponentiating at the rate it is will spill out somewhere. The fact that you find the people migrating as "outcast" is kind of deemeaning your intelligence. Bitter much?
A few thousand would be "migrating", and that is one thing, but several MILLION illegals indicates something to be TRULY wrong with the "culture" they came from, and they seem reluctant to just jettison it as irrelevant cultural flotsam. I.e., they refuse to just dump their baggage and become part of America, they demand special treatment and "rights" that Americans don't even get!
My family has been here for 400 years, and paid taxes all that time, which laws can we break without consequences?
@EPGAH So what you seem to be saying is that we all should stay where we are or go back to where we came from? The pack a big bag of your baggage and move on fella! Just because your family was here for 400 year kind of creates a paradox in your very words here regarding cultural refugees. Your family WAS a cultural refugee family. No, what I believe is that despite the past, or future, we should respect each other and the land we walk apon.
how can they get away with charging more for electricity than others? Gas too? That's just awful. It's good to hear about Can-Do and their efforts to ease their poverty and suffering. I wish people would do more.
Not establishing their own businesses was part of the deal that got them zero property tax, remember?
Honestly, I think the reservations need to end, and Indians should join American mainstream, with all the taxes and responsibilities that come with it.
Or do you just want the privileges of living here?
how insensitive can you be? These people have had it hard since the arrival of ...well...Europeans. Let's be honest. Spaniard and English have done nothing but bring devastation to them as a whole. What's sad is that it still happens today. The injustice is appalling.
The poor stay poor and supressed and depressed, while the big banks, and big money interests of America get TAX PAYER bail out money and richer. This country is completely backwards and the more time that goes on, the sicker I get of the way things are becoming.
kcrone1 3 weeks ago
They do it every year...still!
docmaster1 3 months ago
ARE THY DOING IT THIS YEAR TOO
galegregory97comcast 3 months ago
This is a disgrace, shame on the el. company.
patersongypc1 5 months ago
I CANNOT EVEN BELIEVE THIS I did not know that anything like this was happening
Barrettford 8 months ago
Where is the local leadership on this and other issues? They were not mentioned in this and that seems to be a fundamental part of this video. Otherwise, it loses some credibility. I am not condoning this but the leadership was not included.
mcleodenator 1 year ago
there are too rules
one for the haves ...
and another for the have-nots
we have been sold a lie...
aftermidnight77 1 year ago
Good for you posting this!! Money's not everything...or is it?
Seaphee 2 years ago
Sir, my heart goes out to you and your people,The poor ,elderly,the sick are under attack.The gov.t gives billions to banks and the poor must freeze and die. I would like to post some of your videos on my channel to help you spread the message . This is inhumane for this to be tolerated. You are in my prayers.
meangreenmojo99 2 years ago
Also, my Mom worked at a resturant and the restaurant tried to donate several TONS--literally--of food, but the homeless shelter rejected it because it wasn't completely fresh!
I guess they were starving, but not starving ENOUGH?
When did the "poor" get so haughty that hand-me-downs aren't good enough for them?
I would blame Obama and his handouts for engendering this sense of mega-entitlement, but this happened even BEFORE Obama's reign!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Well, the E-Waste is because people want to get rid of the old computers and toys. I actually donated a whole computer to a homeless shelter, and they started bitching that it wasn't a brand new model. I'm sorry, maybe the OTHER benefactor(s) who give them a free computer would give them a top-of-the-line one!
Perhaps due to their ingratitude, noone else gave them a new computer. And I was dis-inclined to repeat that particular mistake!
EPGAH 2 years ago
There are even some who say recycling ITSELF is a waste, because you spend more energy getting something useful out of trash than you do mining anew--and of course, you need to be more careful when melting down multiple substances with varying melting/evaporation points.
I haven't heard much new on the nanotech front, and people are kind of scared of tech in America, whether from cost or from action movies from Terminator on down giving it a bad name...
EPGAH 2 years ago
Remember what I said earlier that America has regulations to make businesses stay environmentally safe, but other countries don't bother?
China and/or Africa are where the companies usually run off to. They don't care about the environment, as long as they get the money.
Africans and Chinese actually handle molten lead without Hazmat gear...Remember the recent Mattel subcontractor scandal?
A company in California can take old tech apart safely, but not as profitably as China/Africa!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Machines are just high-speed reflections of ourselves.
We rely on the machines for a comfortable living--and in some cases to live at all!
Not just the obvious of hospital machines, but more subtle dependency like tractors. 70% of America's oil goes to farms, rather than cars, makeup, or even plastics! (Despite the b(r)est efforts of Hollywood bimbos)
If we cut back on the farming, more people will starve.
Also, plastics could make settling the ocean floor a temporary solution...
EPGAH 2 years ago
Actually, as much as I hate to admit it, you may be right...But most Americans don't TRY to suck the life out of the land, we try to get by as best we can.
Much as I'm sure others don't TRY to compete with Americans, it's just the "nature of the game".
I'm a technocrat, though, which means I believe technology is the solution.
And if you take it more literally, technocrat means technology in charge, which is NOT a bad thing, certain action-movies aside!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Yes, they're paid to stay poor--and to keep breeding, which makes MORE poor people, so those of us who "can afford to" pay, will have to pay MORE to keep them all alive!
It's literally rewarding a BAD thing.
You do not make progress by handouts and welfare. Not only is this degrading, but it also makes them welfare-dependent instead of self sufficient and autonomous.
Unless that's the idea? Make everyone government-dependent serfs?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Technology doesn't always ruin the natural world, BUT it's more expensive to make it clean, so if one country passes laws to force them to clean up their act, they'll just move to another country without such annoying restrictions, and That Country will call us chumps for caring about the planet rather than maximizing profits.
EPGAH 2 years ago
In 1938 there were slightly less than 2-billion people on this planet. We are now pushing 7-billion, and everything from genius, to intoxicating cleavage is reduced to commodities. They want what We've got, and there's always someone willing to sell it to them--even if they They can't afford it!
Will success spoil the human race? Stay tuned...
EPGAH 2 years ago
Why do they get to play the leech and simply laze around, sucking the life from a superior organism while that organism must work harder and harder to maintain itself?
Of course, that accusation should also go to the rich who are being "generous" with the "unlimited" funds of the taxpayers, but the poor ARE being opportunistic, and "advocacy" groups have fought any attempt to reduce or eliminate welfare.
Obama ALSO ended the Welfare to Work proviso, so Welfare-leeches can leech for LIFE now!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Actually, that's EXACTLY how I described it on another thread: The fact that taxes pay welfare literally makes us slaves to the "poor" who choose to STAY poor.
I know that sounds backward, but think about it: IF you are working longer and harder and seeing no extra benefits from it, BUT the other party is benefiting from YOUR work, then you are their slave, de facto, if not de juro!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Also, our local utilities co. has tacked on a surcharge to people who don't use ENOUGH utilities, claiming it's to help pay for poor people who can't afford their utilities. This seems dubious, because it's an INVOLUNTARY surcharge, and not attached to the people who use TOO MUCH, it's attached to the people who don't use enough!
More importantly, if it was meant for the poor, they could make it voluntary, like the shamrocks or "Round Up for the Hungry", etc.
Something fishy here...
EPGAH 2 years ago
And moreover, why bail them out at all, rather than let Darwin's Will Be Done? That was part of the allure of deregulation: Successful entities would BUYOUT--not BAIL out--unsuccessful entities. Bailouts simply reward incompetence--and look what they did with the money afterward. Other than the lavish parties, a lot went to bonuses of the people who made stupid policy mistakes in the first place!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Actually, Clinton forced banks to make loans to minorities who couldn't afford it, labeling their past payment delinquency a "racial trait". It was legally considered "discrimination" then, NOT to loan to people who wouldn't pay it back. So it came as no surprise that welshers welshed on their debts.
But Bush didn't bail them out, Obama did. Bush has been pegged as an idiot, albeit a straightforward idiot, so do you really think he delayed bailing them out to lay the blame on Obama?
EPGAH 2 years ago
While we could argue the merits and demerits of kicking people off land to create a country on it, let's focus on the present. We're ALL addicted to the technology that keeps us alive, but its administrators are now jacking up the prices and essentially, the system that sustains us is slowly killing us.
Whether we blame Obama or not, what can we do about it?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Those lands are now States with other people living on them. How would you justify kicking them off their land to give "yours" back?
America DOES seem to be going from Land of the Free to Land of the Handouts/Bailouts. It is for good reason that Obama is nicknamed the Handout President!
EPGAH 2 years ago
The Reservation is a semi-sovereign state, separate from, but existing within, and subsidized by, America!
As to "free country", that might be the problem: Mistranslation. FreeDOM is NOT the same as FREEBIES!
Yes, this is the melting pot, but SOME do not want to melt and join in, they want to keep their lesser culture separate, AND get the benefits of American tech!
Yes, we get illegals from elsewhere, but fewer and lower-profile! The first part of being illegal is being undetected!
EPGAH 2 years ago
Question: Would you trade tax-free status, and semi-sovereign "statehood" for just being part of America?
Alternately, would you trade all the technology that America has provided, for the "right" to just live off the land?
EPGAH 2 years ago
Comment removed
EPGAH 2 years ago
it is just a way to keep our people down, live in the city, my last entire bill was $119.29, that's for lights, water, trash and garbage pick up. On my bill it says if I don't pay and my services are shut off, I will have to pay $ 181.01. to get it reconnected, so who can these people on the rez where the power is produced being paying so much more than I do?
apachesbutterfly 2 years ago
Thank you for educating people on indigenous causes .
nauiocelotl 2 years ago
Actually, from what I've been reading lately, a tribe in South Dakota sued Mount Rushmore out of the hands of the Government, but failed to pay taxes on it, so the IRS owns it now.
They are NOT part of the Government, they're a private Corporation empowered to act on behalf of the Government.
Americans are selling out--figuratively and literally--to foreign powers, so yes, your idea that Indians would sell their land out is probably true.
EPGAH 2 years ago
@Nikkafan Some promise! One day the governments will crumble like a house of cards. The continuation of the poplulation of humans in an uncaring, helpless way makes no sense. Maybe going back to living in smaller houses heated by wood fire is the way. But without money, that's not possible either. Something has to give, but why is it always the ones at the end of the line that give; and not the ones at the top of the ladder?
Good video, sad, but heard.
Ohkwa:ri'
Howage1 2 years ago
The end-user always pays for it! Taxes pay for welfare and foreign aid--Easy to be generous with other peoples' money!
As to log-cabins, do you have any idea how much of the population would have to be "reduced" (Or whatever euphemism you choose) to allow everyone to live in their own houses, rather than Heavy Residential structures?
And where would we put the outcast of other countries who keep coming here, seeking a better life at taxpayer expense?
EPGAH 2 years ago
@EPGAH What you are pointing out here is a very big issue, and I agree. What happens will happen obviously. The world can not sustain a population this large and exponentiating at the rate it is will spill out somewhere. The fact that you find the people migrating as "outcast" is kind of deemeaning your intelligence. Bitter much?
Ohkwa:ri'
Howage1 2 years ago
A few thousand would be "migrating", and that is one thing, but several MILLION illegals indicates something to be TRULY wrong with the "culture" they came from, and they seem reluctant to just jettison it as irrelevant cultural flotsam. I.e., they refuse to just dump their baggage and become part of America, they demand special treatment and "rights" that Americans don't even get!
My family has been here for 400 years, and paid taxes all that time, which laws can we break without consequences?
EPGAH 2 years ago
@EPGAH So what you seem to be saying is that we all should stay where we are or go back to where we came from? The pack a big bag of your baggage and move on fella! Just because your family was here for 400 year kind of creates a paradox in your very words here regarding cultural refugees. Your family WAS a cultural refugee family. No, what I believe is that despite the past, or future, we should respect each other and the land we walk apon.
Thanks,
Ohkwa:ri'
Howage1 2 years ago
@Nikkafan
how can they get away with charging more for electricity than others? Gas too? That's just awful. It's good to hear about Can-Do and their efforts to ease their poverty and suffering. I wish people would do more.
Iciclesxo 2 years ago
i know...which is why i made that comment.
Iciclesxo 2 years ago
@Nikkafan
I think Soledad O'Brien should do a special on this.
Iciclesxo 2 years ago
That's right let us establish our own businesses so we have an economic base.
apachesbutterfly 2 years ago
Not establishing their own businesses was part of the deal that got them zero property tax, remember?
Honestly, I think the reservations need to end, and Indians should join American mainstream, with all the taxes and responsibilities that come with it.
Or do you just want the privileges of living here?
EPGAH 2 years ago
how insensitive can you be? These people have had it hard since the arrival of ...well...Europeans. Let's be honest. Spaniard and English have done nothing but bring devastation to them as a whole. What's sad is that it still happens today. The injustice is appalling.
Iciclesxo 2 years ago
with one exception...at least the Spaniards mixed with them...creating something out of it..the subculture of the Mexican people. (some anyways)
Iciclesxo 2 years ago
That's what I'm saying, they could've mixed with Americans too. Although I will point out, the mixture with Spanish was not voluntary...
EPGAH 2 years ago
That's right they don't give a shit, we see this kind of thing happen every day, finally some one has documented it.
apachesbutterfly 2 years ago