Touching the Holy Quran without Ablution (Wudhu) ? Dr Zakir Naik

[esmail1901]

very very very good comment

[WeBorn2DieAnyTime]

READ TAFSIR IBN KATHEER

From, qtafsir (COM)

(لاَّ يَمَسُّهُ إِلاَّ الْمُطَهَّرُونَ )

(Which none touches but the pure ones.) he said, "The Book that is in heaven.'' Al-`Awfi reported from Ibn `Abbas about.

(Which none touches but the pure ones.) he said, "The Book that is in heaven.'' Al-`Awfi reported from Ibn `Abbas about.

(Which none touches but the pure ones.) that `the pure ones' means: "The angels.'' Similar was said by Anas, Mujahid, `Ikrimah, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Ad-Dahhak, ...

[MOHAMMAD10455]

waduh is only for namaz...

namaz ki shart wadhu hai or waduh ki shart pakiszgi..jab takl admi pakk nai huta tab tak uska wadhu nai huta ..or pak honae k liae wadhu nai bal k ghussal karna parta hai..or quan ko hath laganae k shart pakizgi hai na k wadhu..wadhu sirf namaz k shapt hai .quran mai kahi nai likha hua k is ko sirf wo hath lagae jo k wadhu s hai jab k ye hai k ;isko whi hath lagatae hai jo paaak hai; or paak admi ghussal s hi hu jata hai .jab k namaz k liea wadhu zaruri hai

[TheSmartboy77]

zakir naik ignorant

[mo389]

@TheSmartboy77

why?

[TheSmartboy77]

@mo389 because he explain hadees and quran according to his own logic...you may get lot of his ignorant proofs if you listen and crossverify his saying with the quran and hadees.....

[WeBorn2DieAnyTime]

@TheSmartboy77

From, qtafsir (COM)

(لاَّ يَمَسُّهُ إِلاَّ الْمُطَهَّرُونَ )

(Which none touches but the pure ones.) he said, "The Book that is in heaven.'' Al-`Awfi reported from Ibn `Abbas about.

(Which none touches but the pure ones.) that `the pure ones' means: "The angels.'' Similar was said by Anas, Mujahid, `Ikrimah, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Ad-Dahhak, Abu Ash-Sha`tha' Jabir bin Zayd, Abu Nahik, As-Suddi, `Abdur-Rahman bin Zayd bin Aslam and others. Ibn Jarir narrated that Ibn `Abdul-A la..

[TheSmartboy77]

@WeBorn2DieAnyTime did any sahabas touch the quran without wazu ?

[farahp11]

A saheeh hadeeth concerning this has been narrated from ‘Amr ibn Hazm (may Allaah be pleased with him), stating that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) wrote to the people of Yemen: “No one should touch the Qur’aan except one who is taahir (pure).” This is a jayyid hadeeth which has a number of other isnaads which strengthen it. Hence it is known that it not permissible to touch the Qur’aan except in a state of purity from both major and minor impurity. (Shaykh bin Baaz)

[farahp11]

Unfortunately, Dr Naik's expertise is only in comparative religion and not masaa'il and laws. See the famous tafseer of Imam Qurtubi on the verse mentioned - the great Companions Ali, Ibn Masood, Sa'ad ibn Abi Waqqas + the famous Tabi'een Saeed ibn Zaid, Ataa, Zuhree, Nakhaee, Hammad + all the four Imams are agreed upon wudhu being required for touching the Quran. This is based on the hadith in Mu'atta Malik of Amr ibn Haazim where Prophet (SAW) said, none should touch the Quran except a Taahir

[mhd757999]

Total nonsense,stick with comparitive religion..and since when did zakir naik become a mufti ti give fatwas?????

[Frasselita]

@mhd757999 I dont see where Dr Zakir gave a Fatwa? He explained the verse, and the background from where and when the verse where revealed. He said that ACCORDING to Ibn Kathirs Tafseer you can see the background of the verse and come to that conclusion than you can touch the Quran without ablouton. You haters are only hearing, you are not listening.

[mhd757999]

@Frasselita ...he explained it wrong and gave a wrong explanation........All of the sahaba,The Tabeeins,The 4 great imaams and all the fuqahaa and muftis of the wortld agree that touching the quraan without wudhu is forbidden

[Frasselita]

@mhd757999 my brother watch /watch?v=5x3eyBqbWV8

And there will be a response to your video that you sent me.A man who gives me no clear references,i hold his words zero.And i dont only listen to scholars.Allahs says to us to Fatabayyanū (investigate) and to Jihad fi Sebillillah,(strive in the way of Allah).If we would use our logic then we would come to a conclusion that you can touch The Quran without Wudhoo. Watch the video and read my comment. May Allah Guide us all

[mhd757999]

@Frasselita

if you actually watch the video ,he gives more clear references and proof than zakir naik,,the proof is from the quraan and sahih hadith from the most renowned hadith books in the world over, and you cant get any better proof....and if you deny these proofs you are denying the quraan as they are quraan ayats,,,,,thus you become a kaafir.................

[Frasselita]

@mhd757999 It feels like this conversation is not going to lead nowhere. Dr Zakir and i refer to Ibn Kathir tafsir. Ibn Kathir was one of the biggest Islam schoolar in history, and his tafsir is one of the best, if not the best tafsir today.The inpurity in Sura Al-Waqi'ah does not refer to wudhoo, and you know this. The Prophet(pbuh, according to his Seerah (biography) sent ayahs to jewish tribe-leaders. They were jewish so obviously they did not know how to take wudhoo? (cont.)

[Frasselita]

@mhd757999 OK, for the sake of lack of argument. then lets say that the Quran says that no one without wudhoo can touch it. Then i can prove that the Quran is wrong (god forbidd), thus Islam is wrong (god forbidd), and the prophet (pbuh) is a false prophet (god forbidd). I can do it by touching the Quran without wudhoo and prove the Quran wrong. ? you know thats not right. noone can prove the Quran wrong. Beacause its not a handywork of a man, but Allah.

[mhd757999]

@Frasselita

touching the quran without wudhu does not prove anything...ur point is baseless

[oigeezer]

@Frasselita

You watch this. /watch?v=1KSzDu0eAbk

He uses HAZRAT SALMAN FARSI (RA)'s EVIDENCE!!!!! AND OTHER EVIDENCE!!!!!!!!!!!

[abdulsheikfareed]

Dr.Zakir Naik is absolutely correct regarding this issue. Actually Quran is revealed to prophet as 'Wahi' only. It did not come to prophet as in print or some material. The thing which we recite is the real Quran.

[farahp11]

@abdulsheikfareed There is no difference of opinion amongst the scholars after the 1st century hijrah that wudhu is necessary to touch the Quran. All the great 4 imams, Abu Hanifah, Malik, Shafee, Ahmad, and the great scholars after them, inc. Imam Awzaai, Imam ibn Taymiyyah, ibnul Qayyim, Shaykh bin Baaz, Shaykh ibn Uthaymeen all agreed that wudhu is necessary to touch the Quran. Ibn Hazm's view was extremely rare and never taken or practised upon by the Ummah since the 1st century.

[farahp11]

@abdulsheikfareed There is no difference of opinion amongst the scholars after the 1st century hijrah that wudhu is necessary to touch the Quran. All the great 4 imams, Abu Hanifah, Malik, Shafee, Ahmad, and the great scholars after them, inc. Imam Awzaai, Imam ibn Taymiyyah, ibnul Qayyim, Shaykh bin Baaz, Shaykh ibn Uthaymeen all agreed that wudhu is necessary to touch the Quran. Ibn Hazm's view was extremely rare and never taken or practised upon by the Ummah since the 1st century.

[hwud1]

@abdulsheikfareed True... I agree with you. Unfortunately, many consider the physical bind/book and prayer mats, and tasbeeh beads, etc as 'holy' ! - that is not the case, it leads to minor shirk.

[dudefrombelgium]

@abdulsheikfareed

Please.....You realy fall for this?

Give me proof please that muhammad did not wrote it himself because he knew that people in that time where easy to control.......i hear you guys stating all these stories as acctual fact while there is no Absolute science or proof or math to back it up (Altough you like to believe that's the case)

Are you so blind that you cant see that the words in that "Holy book" ARE WORDS ONLY A MAN WOULD UTTER?

[sindy336]

@dudefrombelgium first of all try to understand few fact

1.prophet muhammed(saw) was highly respctd in his society b4 he gets prophethood(wch he got in his 40 yrs).he was called as the MOST TRUTHFUL person in his society.he was luvd by his ppl 4 his honesty.same ppl hated him wen conveyd msg.

2.he was not educated(but he was too intelligent n good in trade)

3.n quran is in the most purest form of arabic..it is like  poetry with pure grammar.

4.he was wealthier b4 he started conveying msg.

[sindy336]

@dudefrombelgium simple fact---y would a man lie??for money,fame.

1.he lost his wealth only after convyin msg..so not for money.

2.he was hated by ppl whom luvd him b4.thy evn tried 2 kill him.he lost his home n was pushed to run awy frm his own birth place..

3.if fame was his aim he would have told quran was written by him...as ppl at that time was amazed hw an illiterate could utter such a beautiful words.-not for fame

[sindy336]

@dudefrombelgium

4.as u say ppl at tht time wre ec 2 contrl,he cud hv told tem 2 worship hm.wch some of tem cud hv belived..so nt 4 fame..

5.ppl evn came for compromise tht thy ll pray hs god 4 1 month n he shd pray teir god 4 nex month..he nvr accptd.

not 1ly him his friends of tht time suffered a lot...do u think thy cud do tis 4 WORDS UTTER BY A MAN.

TER WER NO RESON 4 PROPHET 2 LIE.n i m damn sure u haven't read quran..read it n u ll know it is a HOLY BOOK n hw gr8 ws muhammed (saw)!!!

[dudefrombelgium]

@sindy336

Beautifull words?

Words about the ones who are about to burn in hellfire for not taking the qran serious? Beautifull words that tell us that people who are polyetheist are of lower worth then slaves?

You only have to be brainwashed to think the quran brings a beautifull message

[sindy336]

@dudefrombelgium does other religious books like bible doesn't speak about hell???bt i wonder y ppl wen it comes to quran thy highlite 1ly hell n punishment..u don knw hw many rewards v r mentioned abt n hw much god loves us in quran..plz dont tak abt it wen u dont knw abt it.u need to learn a lot to understnd monotheism..it has its own points 2 prove it.evn bible speak abt monotheism.wen u dont like something u can just avoid it rite??y talkin bad abt it?u can never win..islam ll keep growing.

[dudefrombelgium]

@sindy336

Ok ok you are right.

But you should work on your english spelling because i could barely read it

[kaibabo]

Per my knowledge, Quran was compiled in a book format 30 years after the intaqal of Prophet Mohammad. and thus written words on paper is one format and so is the digital format. I have Quran in my Ipod, then those who disagree with Zakir Nairk, please tell me if its not ok to touch my IPod without Vudu?

Here is the point, we need to be holding and reading Quran (with understanding) as much as we can and at every possibly opportunity. Anything that stops us from that is not true.

[aliorghulam]

@kaibabo brother salam to you,and to agree with you i will say "anything that stops us" reading the Qur'an is incorrect, the correct way to say that is "the only thing" could stop us touching or reading the Qur'an (without wadu) is iblis (saytan).

[kaibabo]

@aliorghulam Add to is so called maulanas that try to monopolize our beautiful religion with their uneducated talk.

[aliorghulam]

@kaibabo Wallahi, this is the fact. @ the same time we have to say Alhumdulillah, now a days we have some Olamah like dr. zakir Naik, i call those people the soldier of Allah for His Deen.



[kaibabo]

@aliorghulam I am so glad we have people like Zakir Naik, Shabir Ali and others. I somehow could not listen to most of the others since they never gave references and talked with emotions. Zakir has or gets the knowledge, uses references and is not emotional in this talk. I have learned a lot from in in the last year.

[oigeezer]

@kaibabo

Don't get ahead of yourself. And neither should Zakir Naik. This interpretation of this verse defies amongst the greatest Sahabis... Hazrat Salman Farsi (RA).

Hazrat Salman Farsi's tafsir of this verse is:

He was teaching the Qur'an, and then went toilet. He came back, and was asked to do wudhu so he could carry on teaching.

He said "No, wudhu is only necessary for TOUCHING the Qur'an".

How can you go against Hazrat Salman Farsi's interpretation???

[oigeezer]

@kaibabo

Touching without wudhu will gain you no benefit from the Qur'an - without wudhu is stopping you, not with wudhu.

Always have wudhu when touching the Qur'an, or you are sinning.

[oigeezer]

@kaibabo

And before book format it was written on leaves etc. So the companions (RA) had to have wudhu then. And regarding your ipod touch or phone or whatever, don't touch the actual letters when they are on the screen without wudhu.

Look at Sheikh-ul-hadith Abdur Raheem Limbada's video... He will explain everything I did WITH EVIDENCE IN A CLEAR MANNER!!!

[shamimuhammed]

@kaibabo ipod and wudu! u also talk like Dr.zakir..:)..may allah make us like him..lets learn more

[mo389]

@kaibabo

no i think he's right. His statement about how any non Muslim, who knows nothing of wudu reads it, it proves the Quran wrong. And of course we know that isnt true.

[haadz135]

@kaibabo u can touch de quran format in ipod without wudu ...coz its nt really de quran ...where u hav 2 turn de pages of de quran....in ipod also u get turn pages but u r not really touching nd turning over de pages ....ipod is a device ..its nt quran .....

[kaibabo]

@haadz135 Think and use your logical mind. The print format did not exist at the time of Prophet Muhammad (PBUH). Thus the format does not matter and you can touch it without wudu (wudu is something that makes logical sense but not required).

[zobitX]

@haadz135 So what your saying a book made of paper is Quran but the ipod isn't. Broaden your wisdom - the Quran in arabic means 'Recitation' -hence referring to the actual message of Allah. That is the Quran NOT the physical book or ipod.

[haadz135]

@zobitX sorry bro ....i nevr meant 2 say dat ....if wat i wrote sounded like dat thn i m extremely sorry !!!

[zeez88]

May Allah Reward Dr ZAKIR for really helping out the muslim ummah!! AMEEN!

[MyMrwrestling]

wat about reading the Quran online?

[libral78]

Little Knowledge is dangerous thing as he has.

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear borther, my question is still unanswered. pleaseanswer at the earliest as i am yet to prove you many imp things. as said earlier i will prove you how asking to prophet even today is not shirk, but to learn all that ull have to be neutrall.

awaiting ur reply for my first question, please dont show ur back as most salafies do when trapped.

regards,

ur brother in islam.

[28happilyeverafter24]

masha Allah brother!

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear brother, u still dint ans my question. awaiting ur reply to the point.

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen thanks alot that you beleive in that ayat of quran, even the context tells the same thing that even the righteous are dead, dont call them dead.

as per this ayat you have made the same mistake as the meccan paggans had done. now if u beleive this ayat then y dont u repent for this disrespect?

i will clear all ur further doubt later, but first ans this point.

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear, quran is not speaking about the bad ones, but about the righteous people.

therefore allah says "And do not speak of those WHO ARE SLAIN IN ALLAHS WAY AS DEAD; nay (they are) ALIVE, but you do not perceive." Quran 2.154

now do u beleive this ayat, if yes then y did u call prophet dead again & again? if u agree then repent for this disrespect & if u dnt beleive this ayat of quran, u r out of islam anyway. i will nt go ahead unless u clear me point by point

awaiting ur reply

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen,dear i was very clear in my post that i beleive he has tasted the death of the world, but he is alive in his grave worshipping. with all ur posts and refrences you dint ans the simple 3 questions.

1- do u belive in the quranic ayat i mentioned, if s then y do u enjoy calling prophet dead again n again?

2- y dont u beleive in hadis of musa praying in his grave?

3- ur doctorine says it is shirk to call dead, then y did prophet tell to say salaam directly?

again pls b to the point

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear brother, this is where u have gone astray, you compare prophets & those who strive in allahs way with ordinary people. ofcourse when allah says you cannot make dead hear, he is talking about ordinary people.

therefore he says "And do not speak of those who are slain in Allah's way as DEAD; nay (they are) ALIVE, but you do not perceive." Quran 2.154. (in this particular ayat allah is clearly telling u that dont compare my saintly people with ordinary persons).

contd pt 2

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear brother, we dont depend our religion on 1 ayat, but we have to take all ayat in consideration.

now wherever you show me ayat that prophet has to die, we beleive all those ayats interms that prophet tasted death, but in his grave he is alive & supplicating. this is further understood from the hadis.

I happened to pass by Moses on the occasion of the Night journey near the red mound (and found him) saying his prayer in his Grave.[Sahih Muslim Book 030, Number 5858:] cntd pt 3

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen pt3, now i hope it is clear that allahs saintly people are just not alive in their graves, but are also supplicating.( now if you dont accept it you will have to diregard quranic ayat & the mentioned hadis. & if u do so u r out of islam directly). so when u say salaam directly to the graveyard inhabitters, it is to those momin persons of allah. this is y prophet showed us this sunnat. contd pt 4

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen pt4, now as per ur doctorine calling to the dead person is shirk, so did the prophet thought us to do shirk with this sunnat? pls ans to the point the follo:

1- do u belive in the quranic ayat i mentioned, if s then y do u enjoy calling him dead?(pls dont rush with the ayats of worldy death, i m aware of all of them).

2- y dont u beleive in hadis i mentioned?

3- ur doctorine says it is shirk to call dead, then y did prophet tell to say salaam directly?

pls pls be to the point.

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen pt3. but prophet has proved through his sunnat that the dead can hear, & you should say peace directly. now this is the status of normal persons , & you nauzbillah say prophet cant hear. there are more things where i will prove that he cant only hear but also can help, & i will prove if you dont accept his help today then you will have to leave your salaah.

but before all this i want you to check the ref of graveyard & tell me y u consider him deaf today?

allah hafiz.

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen pt2. now u say he is unaware of the wordy things. if prophet can listen or not we will see later, before when you go to graveyard what is sunnat to say?

assalamu alaykum ya ahalal kubur that is " oh the inhabiters of the grave peace be upon u & very soon we will follow u". now if they cant hear then why are you talking to them saying oh peace be upon you, if they cant hear then you should say oh allah send peace on this inhabiters. contd pt3

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear brother, now the first & foremost thing i will ask you is to read astagfar & kalima. even a insult of prophets belonging is not accepted to allah. & you have been proudly calling him dead again & again & consider him helpless(la hawla wa laakuwata illabillahil aliyilazim).

"And do not speak of those who are slain in Allah's way as DEAD; nay (they are) ALIVE, but you do not perceive." Quran 2.154.

this ayat is specially for those who consider him dead and helpless. contd pt2

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear brother, i am happy that you have accepted two of his major mistakes, which if you had denied could have lead you to haram/kufr. further i will not explain tarweeh as it is diffrence in sunnah, rather i will discuss HELP OF PROPHET, denial of which will take you out of islam. as per zakir naik "prophet is HELPLESS today, so asking to him today is HARAAM/SHIRK". i question you do you beleive this statement? yes or no? be carefull as it might take you out of islam.

allah hafiz

[mahib25]

@brotherofdeen dear brother, the seriousness of mistake is very important. if you accept the disrespect of allah, prophet or quran then you can be out of islam.

Further this is not the only serious mistake by zakir, there is a list to mention. be it QURAN, TARAWEEH,YAZEED, HELP OF PROPHET ETC. & the poor people accept each n everything from him, not knowing where he is leading them.

may allah protect us from such so called scholars.

jazakhallah khair

[mahib25]

non muslims are not bound unless they accept islam, but muslim should respect quran in each n every manner. thats y i challenge anybody to show 1 ref from sahaba or tabain where they touched quran in IMPURITY.

think before u blindly accept.

[BaytHerz1007]

Zakir Naik needs to be quiet for his own sake,he isn't a mujtahid yet he is making ijtihad?

[sqaish]

the 4 imaams have said its wajib,

[mrwaqy]

Zakir naik is not alim please watch Molana Abdur Raheems reply. Type in the search box:

"Touching the Qur'an with Wudu is Wajib [with proof]"

[mohammadahmad0790]

It's Wajib to do wudu before touching the Quran !

[emacwakeup]

Actually I have a doubt. Wht if I'm sinning. I think I'm going to look into it...

[emacwakeup]

Mashallah. This makes total sense. Now Alhamdulillah I can read Quran in peace.. normally I find it a chore to read Quran cuz of wudu, asthaghfirullah.. in-shaa'Allah I will be reading Quran more regularly now.. peace. Salaams.

[mahib25]

@emacwakeup yes y not, zakir allowed you to touch in impurity also. so keep it on, let us see how far you can go in disrespecting quran.

lahawla wa lakuwata illa billa hila aliyilazim.

[emacwakeup]

@mahib25 Salaams. Hey, did u read my second comment where I said that i was Going to look this up cuz I had a doubt? Well I looked it up and it is impermissible to touch Quran, or the Arabic words without wudu.. but I can read the Arabic with touching in minor impurity, but Deffo not major. And even then I do do wudu before reading and hope that I don't break it.. but its to do with touching rather than reading. Salaams.

[emacwakeup]

Respond to this video... I ment with out touching. U cannot touch the Quran without wudu. U have to have wudu in order to touch the Arabic words. Hope I made myself clear...

[mahib25]

@emacwakeup

salaam brother, happy to c ur reply. we have to be very carefull with regards to prophets, saints, angels, quran that we do not accept any wrong thing abt them.

jazakhallah khair.

[emacwakeup]

@mahib25 yea, that's true. We do hav to b propa careful..

(im I sister btw. Lol)

Salaams.

[Cimbom1990GS]

Does the sheikh now by memoy what ayet number it is? I Knew what ayet the brother was referring, but I cant say it is exactly that verse number, just wondering how he knows that :) But honestly, just get wudu and read quran. So much purer.

[aeo45bneop34qer]

Do the Ablution (Wudhu), after touching the Koran. Not the other way.

[Madhofd]

@razaa09 Please brother, dont say such foolish things. You really think the 4 imams would make such a statement without referring to the authentic sources? he Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) wrote to the people of Yemen: “No one should touch the Qur’aan except one who is taahir (pure).” Dr Zakir interprets this DIFFERENTLY then the 4 imams. So who has the right interpretation? Dr Zakir or the 4 imams? Make ur own choice I guess...

[code925301]

@Madhofd

why are you Ahammadies alway put negative comments on Dr Zakir Videos.

Dr Zakir just explain the whole thing about (taahir)

He just said that Taahir don't mean Vodu

are you stupid or something ?

[Madhofd]

@code925301 Your ignorance truly knows no bounds... jumping to mad conclusions like that.. What I said was: 'The 4 imams INTERPRET the word taahir as woodoo. Dr Zakir INTERPRETS the word to be something else, not woodoo.' So my question was: 'What's the evidence to interpret the word taahir as something else then woodoo???' And btw.. what negative comment? I didnt post anything negative, you're the one calling me stupid.

[code925301]

@Madhofd ok why don't u give the Book and hadiths references and Imams names and then we will see who is right and who is Stupid

by the way according to Quran (98:2:6)muṭahharatan Means "purified"

Surah bayinah Verse 98:2 "rasūlun mina l-lahi yatlū ṣuḥufan muṭahharatan"

A Messenger from Allah , reciting purified scriptures

Clearly saying that Scripture is Purified

My brother Islam is not a Joke . Stop playing around and Create Tafurka among Muslim ouma

you got my reference you tell me urs

[Madhofd]

@code925301 A saheeh hadeeth concerning that has been narrated from ‘Amr ibn Hazm (may Allaah be pleased with him), stating that the Prophet (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) wrote to the people of Yemen: “No one should touch the Qur’aan except one who is taahir (pure).” This is a jayyid hadeeth which has a number of other isnaads which strengthen it.

[Madhofd]

@code925301 With regard to the hadeeth about the purity of the believer, it was narrated that Abu Hurayrah said: “I was met by the Messenger of Allaah (peace and blessings of Allaah be upon him) and I was junub. He took my hand and I walked with him until he sat down. Then I slipped away and washed myself (ghusl), then I came to where he was sitting. He said, ‘Where were you, O Abu [Hurayrah]?’ I told him, and he said, ‘Subhaan-Allaah, O Abu [Hurayrah]!, the believer does not become impure.”

[Madhofd]

@code925301 (Narrated by al-Bukhaari, al-Ghusl, 276; Muslim, al-Hayd, 556).

[code925301]

@Madhofd Ok good so u believe Al bukhaari What you think about this

(3) Narrated Abu Huraira: Allah's Apostle said, "By Him in Whose Hands my soul is, "son of Mary" will shortly descend amongst you people (Muslims) as a just ruler and will break the Cross and kill the pig and abolish the Jizya (a tax taken from the non-Muslims, who are in the protection, of the Muslim government). Then there will be abundance of money and no-body will accept charitable gifts. (Book #34, Hadith #425)

[Madhofd]

@code925301 What does that hadeeth have to do with our discussion? Please explain.

[mrwaqy]

@code925301 Zakir naik is not alim

[NewCure4Atheism]

@mrwaqy Molana Abdur Raheems is not alim

[sqaish]

@NewCure4Atheism maulana abdur raheem may not be classed an alim by you but the hadith he mentions are sahih.

[ahassank]

Dr. Zakir Naik rocks...

[blueeagleTFL]

I HAVE LEARNT ALOT FROM BROTHER ZAKIR. MAY ALLAH REWARD HIS GOOD WORK

[FightMusic94]

@blueeagleTFL

same here!

[khantoon]

@blueeagleTFL Ameen

[kittushona]

fantastic answer as usual

[Madhofd]

The position of all four schools of Sunni Islam is that it is not permitted for someone without wudu to touch the Qur'an.

How does dr zakir naik say this..?

[kaibabo]

@Madhofd You just have to research, logic and best of all ponder.

[leilafalls]

Oh and just to add, the Qur'an as we know today, was not probably put together until about 2 decades after the death of the Prophet (saaw). So What the Prophet's practice for touching the Quran would not be known. So his explanation for Angels touching the Real Qur'an kept with Allah (saw) proves reasonable and truthful.

[MrMaxx5]

@leilafalls what our prophets practise for touching quran?? well our prophet was created from Noor hence whudu was not needed. if the words of allah (swt) can come to our prophet even in a state when he was in bed as we can see from the hadith of aisha (r,a). hence we can not judge our prophet in this. when we look at the sahabhs there amal and action was to do whudu as we also see from the tabeen and tabi tabeen may allah be pleased with them.

[kaibabo]

@leilafalls Agree, I have my Quran in IPod touch and I touch it all the times to listen to it. I don't think I have to be in vudu to touch my IPod. Zakir Naik's explanation makes 100% sense. Another angle, what if you are a hafiz? you have to go around with water everywhere so you can stay in Vudu. Ponder people!!

[tausif255]

for sure the verse is for muslims, & nonmuslims are not bound untill they accept islam.

a clear statement is there that we should touch quran in purity, but there is no statement to say we can touch in impurity.

if still somebody beleives that we can touch quran in impurity, then he need to provide proof from sahaba or tabains that they touched quran in any kind of impurity.

may allah protect us from any disrespect of quran, and also protect us from such deviated scholars.

a.h

[kh4n5]

I think Dr Naik is a bit confused here. The word 'muttahareen' means somebody who has become pure. Angels are created pure so they can not 'become' pure. The natural state of a human is that they are not pure and they attain purity by doing wudhu, ghushl etc. Therefore this verse can not refer to the angels and it refers to humans.

[Zakaria90]

Is it me or at 1.01 when he says " There was an allegation " the audio seems to be cut. Thus he says the sentence " There was an allegation that these verses the prophet was receiving, it was a revalation from the devil ".

Did someone messed with the audio and tried to frame this scholar?

[mmirza00]

Staying in wudu is a shield ... a protection against the devils.... and having wudu its stronger than bullet proof vest...

[zaheerhusainkhan]

But the question is can you offer namaaz with out having performed the wazoo properly . Forget the ahadees which gives many versions but the holy Qora'an has very clearly described it in surah e maidah . It says 2 Aghsalu (wash) face and hands and 2 Masahu , wipe head and legs (wipe with wet hands ) . Is every one doing like this as prescribed in Qoa'an or in different ways like in ahadees . If it is not like in Qora'an then all the Namaaz performed with such wazu are

void or still valid ?

[MrMaxx5]

i.e hadiths and some passed down through action. the action passed down by the sahabs did not need to be said as it was a basic action whic no one needed to mention just like whudu and hadith before it was complied after 100 or so years.so ther was no need to prove if u need whudu to touch the quran

[hamedishere]

@MrMaxx5 This is the best answer...mashallah!!! I didn't thought of it

[MrMaxx5]

@hamedishere bro thrs something called tawatur bil amal tht is when someaction is done by a group of people then you can not deny this. its like a lot of people practising the same action. since the shabhas and the tabeen used to do whudu to touch the quran then we should not try to change what the golden era i.e the shahabas and the tabeen used act upon.

[leilafalls]

@MrMaxx5 Like he said, and also from what i've read, it was the practice of the Prophet (saaw) to try and always be in wudu, and the sahabas always tried to do what the Prophet did. But i think here, saying it isn't fard, means for a muslim, perhaps someone who has trouble keeping their wudu because of bodily functions out of their control, and also, giving the qur'an to non-muslims so that they may read it. Because you cannot tell every non-muslim to do "wudu" and read qur'an.

[MrMaxx5]

@leilafalls by saying --- perhaps someone who has trouble keeping their wudu because of bodily functions out of their control,--- is like doing kiyas. we can not use this verse to describe what usaid only when using fiqh (jurisprudence) a learnt persom can say that. regarding non muslims touching the quran a lot of debates between our scholars. E.G can a muslim take a quran to a non muslim country or can muslim army carry the quran with them etc. these are diffrent masals. bt whudu nds 2 be dne.

[MrMaxx5]

for hundreds of years muslims used to do whudu before touching the holy quran. but now we dont need to....but let me say this there were certain actions which was passed down by the sahabhas etc through sayings i.e hadiths

[mahib25]

@Alyah1201955 -dear brother,

quran was already written at the time of muhammed s.a.w, it was only collected in a book form after muhammed s.a.w.

further, if the verse refered is ONLY to original copy in lohe mahfuz, than why cant muslims touch the COPIES of quran in NAAPAKI(IMPURITY)?

tk cr

allah hafiz

[Alyah1201955]

Brothers and Sisters, please think about this....the Quran, (the hard book) did not exist until after Muhammed (pbuh) passed away....so therefore, anything said to have come from inside the Quran or Hadith such as that "you cannot touch the book the Quran without wudu," could not have existed. Also, correctly so, wudu does not put you in a state of purity, it only conditions the mind and body to come before Allah swt in worship.

[shaikhmudassar25]

@Alyah1201955

the question arises as somebody asked in another post is that,

if the verse in quran only relates to the orignal quran in lohe mahfuz, then why cant muslims touch the copies of quran in impurity or naapaki.

surely the verse in quran is not limited to original quran but it imples to even copies of quran.

allah hafiz.

[mahib25]

any refrence of huzoor or sahaba touching the copies of quran without wudu?

[graxtube]

mashaALLAH... jazakallahu khayran katheeran...

u really cleared that out for me...

it is preferable but not fardh...

shukran...

[graxtube]

mashaALLAH... jazakallahu khayran katheeran...

u really cleared that out for me...

it is preferable but not fardh...

shukran...

[lastresortluver]

Mashallah!

I did not know this. I have been watching Dr. Zakir Naik for the past day, and I have to say, I have learned many things that I haven't heard. I have to tell this to my mother and sister.

Well, done, Dr. Zakir Naik! Alhumdulillah, may Allah protect you.

[piratebob10]

He says that it is preferable when touching the Quran to have done wudu but for Salah it is compulsary! Its a valid argument, i dont understand why there is some confusion with regards to salah and wudu 

[shehzadiish]

zakir naik..u are duin a nice job......mashalla.....

[mbksold]

zakir naik memory is like a 80 gb hard disk with 4gb ram & core i 7 processor

mind blowing genius .......................

[tropicalmusicdrummer]

salaam brothers

NHPFAN0789 he said it Good zakir is talking about the qoran, not thee Salah! lLISTEN GOOD what he meens he Sayd he talks about the qoran and the verse listen good you will understand

zakir naik is like a computer like everything copyied in his head may Allah give him more knowledge and janna

Salaam

[zelem92]

allahu alim allah knows best on wether its fard or mustahab.

[103chef]

dear brothers plz check dr.Zakir nail last talk on this video time 2:44 - 2:55.

he said "there are no vers in quraan or hathez Wu'du is compulsary for touching the quraan, Wu'du is compulsary for salah. what is mean that..........? Im not try to find mistake fr him, may be I misunderstanding.

Dr. zakir naik my 1 Osthaath after sheik ahmed deedat.

[strivetillend]

Brother. You can touch Quran without Wu'dhu.

but it's highly recomended to make wu'dhu before you touch and reading it. Again brother. Dr zakir is correct in this video.

Allah knows best.

[nhpfan0789]

he said, " thers no verse in the quran or hadith that wudhu is compulsory for thouching the quran, but wudhu IS compulsory for salah.."

[RexKSD]

@103chef what he meant is that there is no evidence in hadith or quran that says we should take wudhu to touch qurand but there is evidence that says we should take wudhu when we want to salah and face Allah

[103chef]

is this right Dr.zakir naik said to pray without ablution (wolud)?

[strivetillend]

watched the video. he already answer you.

[103chef]

brother... in this video need mor explain on this subjet. how we can pray without wodu.......?

[strivetillend]

Brother, we cannot pray without Wu'dhu. in this video Dr.Zakir did mentioned it's compulsary, a fard to make wu'dhu before offering solat.

[103chef]

but he said "there are no vers in quraan or hathez Wu'du is compulsary for salah. what is mean that..........?

[hmohdkhan]

Assalamo aliakum

Peace be upon all

All praises is due to ALLAH

Here the topic is touching the Holy Quran without Ablution or with Ablution...He is not telling about Salaah or Prayers..

From the Quran and Hadith the obligation of doing Wadu or Ablution before Salaah is clearly mentioned..

[103chef]

valaikumussalam varha.......

thanx brother...

but he said "there are no vers in quraan or hathez Wu'du is compulsary for salah. what is mean that..........?

[tashalovesu]

@hmohdkhan but we should do wadu before reading the quran right?

[toxicfuego]

@103chef Brother he said it is obligatory to have Wudu' to pray but wudu' is not required to touch the Quran, but it is more preferable to have wudu' when touching the Quran.

[yesrana]

ALHAMDULILLAH, I tried to explain this to so many people about 3 years ago, no one believed me. thanks zakir naik and the uploader.

[aftazita]

mashallah zakir naik is doing a great job .

[iftyshifty]

When i go to the bathroom, i never leave it without doing wudu first. It only takes 2 minutes to perform wudu and makes it so easy to read my salah when its time. Staying in wudu has been amazing for me so though i would pass the idea on to all my brothers and sisters.

[MrArsalan11]

@iftyshifty wudu is a weapon of a muslim .

[DariusEG]

@iftyshifty That is a very good habit! My dad follows its diligently. Sadly, I have yet to catch on to the habit.

Anyways, may Allah help us all in following the right path.

[razaa09]

@iftyshifty Thank you Brother

[muneer2908]

gr8 explanation Dr. Naik Sahab

[rhoque2]

allah hu akbar

may allah swt bless zakir naik

[aaawan123]

Subhan Allah